<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=76&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-06-13T04:19:35+01:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>76</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>3494</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3210" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3982">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/51d77364b63243cd6420b482dbfaa0ca.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6e76307f14d5c2779db328c5358fbc0b</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="24659">
                    <text>1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Turkey: A Two Stage Data
Envelopment Analysis
Ahmet AKIN
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Fatih University, Istanbul
akin@fatih.edu.tr
Merve KILIÇ
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Fatih University, Istanbul
mervekilic@fatih.edu.tr
Selim ZAĐM
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Fatih University, Istanbul
szaim@fatih.edu.tr

Abstract: Financial industry plays an important role in the economy and banks are
indispensable players in the financial industry. Therefore, the evaluation of banks’
performance became a popular research topic in all over the world, and also in Turkey. There
are different techniques to determine the banks’ performance. Among those techniques, Data
Envelopment Analysis (DEA), which is a non-parametric technique, has been widely used in
the banking sector. In this research, we analyzed the efficiency of Turkish Banking Industry
with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology between 2002 and 2007. All the banks
that constantly operated in the years between 2002 and 2007, excluding investment and
development, participation banks, get into the analysis. So there are four groups of banks in
the research, those are state-owned deposit banks, privately-owned deposit banks, foreign
banks founded in Turkey, and foreign banks having branches in Turkey. In the research
model, number of employees, interest expenses, non-interest expenses and total deposit are
determined as input, total credits, interest revenue and non-interest revenue are determined as
output. This analysis aims to explain the variation in efficiency scores with a set of
explanatory variables, such as size, ownership type, nationality, being publicly held.
According to results, the efficiency levels do not change very much between 2002 and 2007.
The efficiency scores reached top level in 2005 and 2006. The results of regression
application denote that all of the explanatory variables have a significant effect on banks’
efficiency levels. According to regression analysis results, size negatively affects the
efficiency levels of banks. Publicly listed banks operate more efficient than not publicly listed
banks. Foreign owned banks operate more efficient than their domestic peers. Furthermore,
state owned banks are less efficient than non-state banks.
Keywords: Efficiency, Data Envelopment Analysis, Tobit Regression Model, Turkish
Banking Sector.

1. Introduction
With the changes in economical environment, financial institutions have an essential role in the
developing countries’ economy. Especially banks are fundamental players in the financial industry. So the
evaluation and assessment of banks’ performance, efficiency, and effectiveness have attracted considerable
attention. Measurement of efficiency of banking institutions serves two important purposes. It helps to
benchmark of an individual bank against the “best practice” banks and secondly, it helps to evaluate the impact
of various measures on the efficiency and performance of these institutions (Das et al. 2009). But the
performance measurement in banking sector is not so straightforward, because there are some difficulties in
determining inputs and outputs of a bank for efficiency measurement. There is not consensus on that subject.
Furthermore, banks may not be homogeneous with respect to types of output they produced.
In Turkey context, some reforms were applied in banking industry after 1980s. The banking industry
experienced some financial crises in November 2000 and February 2001. The efficiency level of banking sector
decreased in those years. This situation required restructuring of banking sector in Turkey. There are some
researches that investigate the performance of banking sector after liberalization policies in 1980s or the effects
of financial crises on banking sector. There is not much study that investigates the recent efficiency of Turkish
Banking Industry.

32

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

There are a lot of techniques to determine the banks’ performance. One of them is ratio analysis. In
ratio analysis, measures such as return on assets (ROA), return on investment (ROI), liquidity ratios give only
one dimension of performance. In this type analysis, different measures can give contradictory results. The
regression analysis eliminates this disadvantage but it can only handle one output at a time. In the most of
industries corporations especially in banking operate with many inputs and many outputs. Therefore there exists
a requirement for efficiency measurement method besides ratio and regression analysis. Data envelopment
analysis which was originally introduced by Charnes et al. (1978) is capable of solving multiple inputs and
outputs and enables to see complete picture of performance of a company.
This paper examines the efficiency of Turkish banking sector for the period 2002-2007. In this study
the effects of size, ownership type, being publicly held on performance are also analyzed. There are two stages
of this research. First stage is the analysis of efficiency levels of banks with Data Envelopment Analysis
methodology and the second stage is determination of the effects of bank size, ownership type, nationality and
being publicly held on bank efficiency scores by Tobit Regression.
The paper is structured in the following way. Section 2 includes a brief review of the literature about
bank performance and explanatory variables’ effects on banks’ efficiency levels. Section 3 denotes the research
sample of this study, input and output variables that are used, and outlines the non-parametric Data
Envelopment Analysis methodology. In the fourth section the results of the study are charted and the findings
are discussed. And in the fifth section the conclusions of the study are presented.

2. Literature Review
In a rapidly changing financial market worldwide, bank regulators, managers, and investors are
concerned about how efficiently banks transform their expensive inputs into various financial products and
services (Işık &amp; Hassan 2002). So the investigation of the financial institutions has been motivated by
academics, policy makers, bankers. There a lot of studies Sufian (2008), Işık (2008), Rezitis (2006), Işık and
Hasan (2002), Das et al. (2009), Mercan et al. (2003) that examine the efficiency levels of banks with different
methods.
Some researchers investigated also the effects of some explanatory variables on bank efficiency, such
as, size, type of ownership, bank configuration, being publicly traded or not.
Bank size is generally measured by banks’ amount of assets. Jackson and Fethi (2000), Mercan et al.
(2003), Rezitis (2006) analyzed the effect of the bank size on efficiency found a positive relationship between
size and efficiency. Işık and Hassan (2002) determined a negative relationship between bank size and
efficiency. Chen et al. (2005) indicated that large and small banks are more efficient than medium banks. Aly et
al. (1990) investigated the effect of size on the overall efficiency, technical efficiency, allocative efficiency and
pure technical efficiency of banks and they measured size as total deposits in thousand of dollars and number of
bank branches. They found that size is positively related to efficiency, regardless of whether size was measured
as total deposits or number of branches. There is no consensus on how bank size affects bank efficiency, but
general view large banks are more efficient than small and medium sized banks.
Hypothesis 1. Large sized banks are more efficient than small sized banks.
The market hypothesis supposed that publicly traded banks should operate more efficient than not
publicly traded. But studies that analyze the relationship between being publicly listed or not and bank
efficiency generally indicate there is not a significant relationship. Sufian (2009) investigated the effect of being
publicly listed on bank performance and did not find evidence of higher efficiency levels of the publicly listed
banks. Havrylchyk (2006) studied on being publicly traded effect the performance of banks, but observed no
impact of publicly traded on banks efficiency. Mamatzakis et al. (2008) discriminated the banks as publicly
listed or not and analyzed the effect of being publicly listed on efficiency, the results do not reveal significant
differences between publicly traded or not traded banks.
Hypothesis 2. Being publicly held has no affect on bank’s performance.
Jackson and Fethi (2000) analyzed the effect of ownership type on banks’ performance and according
to their results state ownership worsens efficiency. Işık and Hassan (2002) found that private banks operate
more cost efficient than banks in public sector. Mercan et al. (2003) classified the banks according to type of
ownership as state-owned, private and foreign. State-owned banks had lowest performance in their study.
Sufian (2009)’s study showed that the foreign banks are likely to be more efficient than domestically owned
banks. Jackson et al. (1998) analyzed the performance of banks during the period 1992-96 in Turkey. Among
three ownership types, private and foreign banks showed greater productivity growth compared to state owned
banks. Chen (1998), Chen and Yeh (2000) analyzed the efficiency differences between private and public banks
in Taiwan. The results indicated that private banks operate more efficient than public banks. Havrylchyk (2006)
assessed the efficiency of foreign and domestic banks, showed that foreign banks are operating in a higher level
of efficiency than domestic banks. Also, his study showed that state banks are more efficient than other
domestic banks. Chen et al. (2005) grouped the Chinese banks as state owned commercial banks, national-joint

33

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

equity banks, regional-joint equity banks and investment banks to determine the relation between efficiency
level and type of ownership. State banks showed a relatively higher efficiency level. Lensink et al. (2008)
analyzed 2095 banks in 105 countries over the years 1998-2003 and found that foreign ownership negatively
affects bank efficiency. Bonin et al. (2005) suggested that foreign-owned banks are more cost-efficient than
other banks.
Hypothesis 3. Private banks operate more efficiently than public banks.
Hypothesis 4. Foreign ownership positively affects bank efficiency.

3. Research Methods
3.1. Sample
The research sample of this study includes all the banks that operated in Turkey constantly between
2002–2007, excluding investment and development, and participation banks. This data set should be as
homogeneous as possible to be meaningful for relative efficiency measurement for DEA application. So there
are four groups of banks in the research, state-owned deposit banks, privately-owned deposit banks, foreign
banks founded in Turkey, and, foreign banks having branches in Turkey. Total thirty-one banks from those
groups are determined and get into the analysis.
Table 1: The Banks in the Analysis
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
B10
B11
B12
B13
B14
B15
B16

ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
Adabank A.S.
Akbank T.A.S.
Alternatif Bank A.S.
Anadolubank A.S.
Arap Türk Bankası A.S.
Bank Mellat
Citibank A.S.
Denizbank A.S.
Eurobank Tekfen A.S.
Finans Bank A.S.
Fortis Bank A.S.
Habib Bank Limited
HSBC Bank A.S.
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A
Millennium Bank A.S.

B17
B18
B19
B20
B21
B22
B23
B24
B25
B26
B27
B28
B29
B30
B31

ING Bank A.S.
Societe Generale (SA)
Sekerbank T.A.S.
Tekstil Bankası A.S.
Turkish Bank A.S.
Turkland Bank A.S.
Türk Ekonomi Bankası A.S.
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Ziraat Bankası A.S.
Türkiye Garanti Bankası A.S.
Türkiye Halk Bankası A.S.
Türkiye Đs Bankası A.S.
Türkiye Vakıflar Bankası T.A.O.
Unicredit Banca di Roma S.P.A.
WestLB AG
Yapı ve Kredi Bankası A.S.

3.2. Measurement of Variables
The necessary data set from the income statements and balance sheets of the banks is obtained from the
annual issues of the Bank Association of Turkey.
In the banking performance literature, there is no definite consensus on the determination of bank inputs and
outputs. But there are two main approaches to determine the inputs and outputs that can be used for efficiency
measurement; production approach and intermediation approach (Thanassoulis 1999; Sealey &amp; Lindley 1977;
Anthanassopoulos 2009). According to production approach, banks are regarded as using labor and capital to
generate deposits and loans, and according to intermediation approach deposits are regarded as being converted
into loans (Avkıran 2006). Avkıran (2006) summarized two approaches, and showed inputs and outputs for two
approaches. Under production approach, number of employees, occupancy, furniture and equipment, other noninterest expenses are determined as input, number of demand deposits, time deposits, real estate loans,
installment loans and commercial loans are determined as output. Under intermediation approach, deposits,
debentures, other liabilities, shareholder equity, number of employees, physical capital, non-interest expenses
are regarded as inputs, loans, securities, deposits with other banks, except central bank, non-interest income are
regarded as outputs. Sufian and Majid (2007) employed DEA method to investigate the effects of merger and
acquisitions on Singaporean domestic banking groups’ efficiency. They estimate two alternative models and
they used total deposits as input, total loans and non-interest income as output in the first model, non-interest
and interest income as output and interest and non-interest expense as input in the second model. Aysan and
Ceyhan (2008) determined the inputs as labor, capital and loanable funds, outputs as short- and long-term

34

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

credits, off-balance sheet items, and other earning assets. Jackson et al. (1998) used number of employees and
the sum of non-labor operating expense, the direct expenditure on buildings and amortization expenses as
inputs, loans, demand deposits and time deposits as output under value-added approach. Wheelock and Wilson
(1999) investigated the technical progress, inefficiency and productivity change between 1984 and 1993. They
employed three inputs: labor, physical capital, purchased funds, five outputs: real estate loans, commercial and
industrial loans, consumer loans, all other loans, total demand deposits by adopting intermediation approach.
Oral and Yolalan (1990), Ayadi et al.(1998) determined inputs as interest paid on deposits, expenses on
personnel, administration etc. and total deposits, outputs as total loans, interest and non-interest income. Aly et
al. (1990) employed a non-parametric frontier approach in their study to calculate the overall, technical, pure
technical, allocative and scale efficiencies of a sample of 322 independent banks. And, they determined the
inputs as labor, capital, loanable funds, outputs as real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, consumer
loans, all other loans and demand deposits. Bergendahl (1998) applied DEA to Nordic Banks by using loan
volumes, deposit volumes, and gross revenues as output, costs of personnel, cost of material and the volume of
credit losses as input. Işık (2008) investigated the technical X-efficiency and productivity growth of novo banks
and established banks by using a non-parametric frontier method. By employing intermediation approach the
outputs that are used in his research are, short-term loans, long-term loans, and other earning assets, the inputs
are labor, capital, and loanable funds. Havrylchyk (2006) investigated the efficiency of the Polish Banking
industry between 1997 and 2001, and under intermediation approach he determined the inputs as capital, labor
and deposits, outputs as loans, government bonds, and off-balance sheet items. Chen et al. (2000) analyzed the
operating efficiency of 34 commercial banks in Taiwan banking sector. Under intermediation approach they
determined outputs as provision of loan services, portfolio investment, and non-interest income, inputs as bank
staff, assets and bank deposits for this analysis. Liu (2009) used slack-based efficiency measures to measure the
efficiency of 24 banks in Taiwan; he employed deposits, interest and non-interest expenses as input, loans,
interest income and non-interest income as output in his study.
By taking into consideration the literature intermediation approach is used in the analysis. Number of
employees, interest expenses, non-interest expenses, and total deposits are determined as input; total loans,
interest income, and non-interest income are determined as output. All variables are measured in thousands of
Turkish Liras, except number of employees.
3.3. Measurement of Efficiency
The efficiency measurement is generally performed in several methods such as ratio analysis,
parametric and non-parametric methods. In the ratio analysis, efficiency is measured with the calculation of
several ratios of financial units. The financial unit with the highest output over input or lowest input over output
is determined as efficient. But for the calculation of efficiency of financial units which operate multi-input and
multi-output ratio analysis is not suitable. Another criticism about the ratio analysis is that some ratios denote
that the firm has a successful level of performance but other may show the opposite. The regression analysis
does not suffer from that disadvantage, but it assumes a priori form of functional relationship between inputs
and outputs, in addition regression analysis can only handle one output at a time (Manadhar &amp; Tang 2002). In
the most of industries corporations especially in banking operate with many inputs and many outputs. Therefore
there exists a requirement for efficiency measurement method besides ratio and regression analysis. There are
another two techniques called as parametric and non-parametric enable efficiency measurement with many
input many output. One of the nonparametric techniques which is widely used to measure efficiency is Data
Envelopment Analysis (DEA).
3.3.1. The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Model
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a linear based programming model which was first proposed by
Charnes et al. in 1978 twenty years after Farrell’s seminal work for evaluating activities of not-for-profit entities
participating in public programs. Recent years a variety of DEA applications have been seen for evaluating the
performances of different kinds of entities engaged in many different activities in many different contexts in
many different countries (Cooper et al. 2004). DEA assess the comparative efficiency of homogeneous
organizational units, such as bank branches, schools, tax offices, and hospitals (Thanassoulis 1999). DEA
responds to the need for satisfactory procedures to assess the relative efficiencies of multi-input multi-output
production units (Cook &amp; Seiford 2008). The efficiency score is usually denoted as either a number between
zero and one or 0 and 100 percent. The efficiency score of one or 100 percent of a decision making unit shows
that decision making unit is efficient relative to other units in the research sample. In addition to providing
meaningful scalar efficiency values, DEA is designed to determine the sources and estimate the amounts of
inefficiencies that might present in the various output and input vectors (Charnes et al. 1991). The most
important advantage of DEA over other traditional econometric frontier method is that it does not require prior

35

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

assumption (such as standard forms of statistical regression analysis) about the analytical form of the production
function (Avkıran 1999; Banker 1984; Cooper et al. 2004). In addition, DEA enable to calculate the efficiency
of decision making units that operates multi-input and multi-output. DEA is a valuable benchmarking tool,
because it identifies inefficiencies in decision making units by comparing them with similar decision making
units regarded as efficient (Avkıran 2006). Unlike other benchmarking tools that rely on the managers’
observation, comparison, DEA enables to identify best practices that are too complex to be identified (Sherman
&amp; Ladino 1995). On the other hand, the main problem about DEA model is that, it is a non-parametric method,
so it is sensitive to the measurement problems (Al-Sharkas et al. 2008).
The relative performance measurement of DEA is a two-staged process (Mercan et al. 2003):
(i) Determining the best performing decision making units that produces greatest output with the least
input. Assigning a DEA performance-index value of unity (1) to such decision making units and
placing them on the efficient frontier.
(ii) Determining the DEA performance-index values for all other decision making units in the set. Such
values are represented by the distance of the less efficient units from the above defined efficient
frontier. The decision making units in this subset use more inputs given an output level or produce less
output for a specific level of inputs.
DEA determines, the most productive decision making unit, the amount of excess resources used by
inefficient decision making units, the amount of excess capacity or ability to increase service outputs in lessproductive units, the set of best-practice service units most similar to the less-productive units, referred to as the
best-practice reference set (Sherman &amp; Ladino 1995).
Mathematical formulation of DEA model can be stated as:
m

Max Z o =

∑u
r =1
n

∑v
i =1

ro

y ro
(1)

io

x io

Subject to the constraints:
m

∑

r =1
n

u rj y rj

∑

≤ 1

for j = 1, 2, k

v ij x ij

i =1

(2)

u ,v
ro

io

≥0

for r =1, m; and i = 1, n

(3)

Where:
Zo
: Efficiency score of oth decision making unit.
: Observed value of input i for the decision making unit j.
x ij

yrj

: Observed value of output r for the decision making unit j.

u rj , vij

: Weights of input r and output i of decision making unit j respectively.

k
m
n

: Number of decision making units.
: Number of outputs.
: Number of inputs.
Linear programming expression of the DEA model is like that:
m

Max Z o = ∑ u ro y ro
r =1

(4)
Subject to the constraints:
n

∑v x
i =1

36

io

io

=1

(5)

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

m

∑u
r =1

n

rj

yrj ≤ ∑ vij xij

for j = 1, 2, k

(6)

i =1

u ro , vio ≥ 0

for r =1, m; and j =1, n

(7)

4. Results
The efficiency scores of each bank included in the sample are shown in Table 2. The efficiencies of the
banks are examined between the years 2002-2007 with input oriented CCR model. The banking sector operated
higher than 0.8 of efficiency scores in the whole research period. The average scores are 0.87 in 2002, 0.89 in
2003, 0.84 in 2004, 0.91 in 2005, 0.92 in 2006, 0.88 in 2007. The efficiency levels increased after the 2002 and
reached 0.92 point in 2006, and again decreased 0.88 in 2007. There is a recovery phase in banking industry
performance. There are six banks that operated efficiently in the whole research period. So the 19% percent (six
of thirty-one banks) operated constantly efficient from 2002 through 2007. Also, there are thirteen banks that
operated inefficiently during all analysis period. So the 41% (thirteen of thirty-one banks) operated inefficiently
between 2002 and 2007.
Table 2: CCR-I Efficiency Scores (2002-2007)

B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
B10
B11
B12
B13
B14
B15
B16
B17
B18
B19
B20
B21
B22
B23
B24
B25
B26
B27
B28
B29
B30
B31
Average

2002
1,00
0,76
1,00
0,86
0,79
1,00
1,00
0,63
0,77
0,73
1,00
0,72
1,00
0,94
1,00
0,81
0,78
1,00
0,64
0,77
0,85
0,76
0,79
0,94
0,97
1,00
0,75
0,72
1,00
1,00
0,88
0,87

2003
0,88
1,00
1,00
0,79
0,99
1,00
1,00
0,65
0,91
0,66
0,90
0,83
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,49
0,84
1,00
0,59
0,91
0,85
0,87
0,97
0,99
1,00
1,00
0,75
0,90
1,00
1,00
0,99
0,89

2004
1,00
0,55
1,00
0,99
0,83
0,77
1,00
0,66
0,75
0,62
0,86
0,78
1,00
0,78
1,00
0,40
0,86
1,00
0,84
0,72
0,82
0,66
0,76
1,00
0,83
1,00
0,82
1,00
0,91
1,00
0,80
0,84

2005
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,90
0,78
0,87
1,00
0,98
0,90
0,65
1,00
0,83
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,68
0,86
1,00
0,92
0,85
0,81
0,79
0,88
1,00
0,96
1,00
0,94
1,00
0,93
1,00
0,78
0,91

2006
1,00
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,82
0,78
1,00
0,97
0,91
0,75
0,96
0,87
1,00
0,98
1,00
0,86
0,85
1,00
0,77
0,88
0,85
0,68
0,85
1,00
0,98
1,00
0,91
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,87
0,92

2007
0,75
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,85
0,60
1,00
0,67
0,81
0,99
0,85
0,69
1,00
0,80
1,00
1,00
0,82
1,00
0,73
0,87
0,66
0,67
0,77
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,86
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,83
0,88

Frequency of
Efficiency
3
4
6
2
0
2
6
0
0
0
2
0
2
2
6
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
6
0
4
4
6
0

37

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

The total efficiency, technical efficiency and scale efficiency of the banks are also analyzed and the
findings are showed in Table 3. Input oriented CCR efficiency scores give the total efficiency of banks. Input
oriented BCC results give the technical efficiency of banks. As CCR scores are divided by BCC scores, the
outcome will give the scale efficiency of banks.
The average technical efficiency levels of banks are higher than average scale efficiency levels within
this period. It is observed that the increase in total efficiency level is mainly resulted from the increase in
technical efficiency level. Given our results that Turkish banking sector suffered from scale inefficiency.

Table 3: Total Efficiency, Technical Efficiency and Scale Efficiency of the Banks

B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
B10
B11
B12
B13
B14
B15
B16
B17
B18
B19
B20
B21
B22
B23
B24
B25
B26
B27
B28
B29
B30
B31
Average

Total Efficiency
0,94
0,88
1,00
0,92
0,84
0,84
1,00
0,76
0,84
0,73
0,93
0,79
1,00
0,92
1,00
0,70
0,83
1,00
0,75
0,83
0,81
0,74
0,84
0,99
0,96
1,00
0,84
0,94
0,97
1,00
0,86
0,89

Technical Efficiency
1,00
0,97
1,00
1,00
0,89
0,98
1,00
1,00
0,92
0,80
1,00
0,98
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,83
0,93
1,00
0,92
0,95
0,85
0,87
0,95
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,99
0,95
0,98
1,00
0,99
0,96

Scale Efficiency
0,94
0,91
1,00
0,92
0,95
0,85
1,00
0,76
0,91
0,91
0,93
0,80
1,00
0,92
1,00
0,85
0,90
1,00
0,81
0,87
0,95
0,85
0,88
0,99
0,96
1,00
0,85
0,98
1,00
1,00
0,87
0,92

Table 4: Tobit Regression Results (n=176)

Size
Nationality
Ownership
Publicly Listed
Constant

38

Coefficient
-0.0697283
-0.0762108
0.1843663
0.0757398
0.9239495

Standard Error
0.0231161
0.0217101
0.0341993
0.0248959
0.0145359

t-ratio
-3.02
-3.51
5.39
3.09
63.56

P-value
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.003
0.000

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

The effects of bank size, ownership type, nationality and being publicly held on total efficiency are
analyzed with Tobit Regression by STATA. Ownership type, nationality, size and being publicly held are
employed as dummy variables. In this analysis, DEA efficiency score of a bank is determined as dependent
variable. If the coefficient of an explanatory variable is positive, it increases the efficiency level of the bank. In
spite of that if the coefficient of an explanatory variable is negative; it decreases the efficiency level of the bank.
Significance level of the regression is 95%. The findings imply that all explanatory variables are significantly
different from zero and have a significant effect on efficiency score of banks.
Banks are grouped as large and small according to their assets levels in this study. Size has a negative
effect on efficiency levels of banks, suggesting that the smaller the bank, the more efficient bank will be. There
is a scale problem in Turkish banking sector, the banks can not use economies of scale advantage. There may be
decreasing return to scale in Turkish banking sector. 1% percent increase in inputs results less than 1% increase
in outputs. As the banks grow they become less efficient. Larger banks have lower efficiency which could be
due to complex organizational structure and moral hazard behavior (Sufian &amp; Abd. Majid 2007). In Turkey,
smaller banks are typically newer and generally specialize in trade and finance and wholesale corporate banking
and employ more professional and astute management teams (Işık &amp; Hassan 2002). Because of competition
small banks should operate efficient to survive especially in metropolitan markets. The results are accordance
with Işık and Hassan (2002) on Turkish banking sector.
To analyze the relationship between publicly traded and Turkish banks’ efficiencies a dummy variable
is introduced as an explanatory data. Being publicly traded has a positive effect on efficiency levels of banks.
So, the publicly traded banks operate more efficient than not publicly traded banks. That finding supports the
market discipline hypothesis. According to this hypothesis banks whose shares are publicly traded should
exhibit higher efficiency. Thus, the easily transferable ownership structure of firms creates incentives for both
shareholders to monitor management performance and for bank management to improve their performance as it
contains risks associated with moral hazard practices (Mamatzakis et al. 2008).
Banks of different nations may have different outcomes with the same inputs. Thus, in this section the
effect of ownership type and nationality on efficiency levels of banks are analyzed.
Ownership dummy is determined as state and non-state banks. The positive sign of the coefficient on
non-state ownership binary variable implies that non-state ownership improve the efficiency level of the banks.
Non-state banks operate more efficient than state banks. There are two major reasons behind the efficiency
difference between public and private firms. The first is while all private firms are profit maximizing, public
firms would pursue whatever objectives the government demands. The second is while private firms are subject
to relatively hard budget; public firms are subject to relatively soft budgets (Işık &amp; Hassan 2002).
Nationality has a positive effect on efficiency levels. The positive sign of the coefficient on foreign
ownership binary variable implies that foreign ownership improve the efficiency level of the banks. Foreign
banks operate more efficient than their domestic counterparts. This may be because of foreign owned banks
have better risk management, operational, technological techniques which they enable from their parent banks
abroad. The empirical observation that foreign banks perform better compared to domestic banks in developing
countries. This suggests that technical ability of banks from developed countries overcomes the home field
advantage in developing countries (Jeon &amp; Miller 2005). Berger et al. (2000) explained the differences between
home field advantages and global advantages. The global advantage hypothesis denotes that foreign banks
might benefit from competitive advantages relative to their domestic banks. Foreign banks may also become
more competitive when compared to domestic banks due to an active market for corporate control in the home
country, and because they have access to an educated labor force that is able to adapt new technologies
(Lensink et al. 2008). The results are accordance with Sufian (2008) on Malaysian banks, Jackson et al. (1998)
on Turkish banks, Işık and Hassan (2003) on Turkish banks, Havrylchyk (2006) on Polish banks, Bonin et al.
(2005) in transition countries.

5. Conclusion
This paper aims to determine the efficiency of Turkish banks between 2002 and 2007. So, the
efficiency levels of Turkish banking sector are analyzed during the period 2002-2007 with Data Envelopment
Analysis. Then, multivariate regression analysis have been employed in order to detect the determinants of
banking efficiency in Turkey.
The sample includes thirty-one banks that continuously operated during this period. According to
results, the efficiency level of Turkish banking did not change very much in the analysis period. The banking
sector operated at stable efficiency level. The average performance values between 0.84 and 0.92 in this period.
Additionally, the findings reveal that the average technical efficiency scores of banks are higher than average
scale efficiency scores. There is a scale inefficiency problem in Turkish banking sector.
The effects of some explanatory data on the banks’ efficiency levels are also analyzed in this research.
Size, ownership type, nationality, being publicly listed are improved as dummy variables. Findings imply that

39

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

smaller banks are more efficient than larger banks. As the banks grow they become less efficient. The Turkish
banking sector may experience decreasing returns to scale. Publicly listed banks are more efficient than not
publicly listed banks. This finding is compatible with market discipline hypothesis which suggests stockholders
of the banks can exert market discipline over bank management, so the publicly traded banks are expected to be
more efficient. Non-state banks operate more efficient than their state counterparts. This may be because of the
goals of those two banks differentiate. Private entities always aim to maximize their profit. The regression
analysis results also denoted that foreign banks are more efficient compared to their domestic peers. Foreign
banks might profit from better risk management and take advantage of technological improvements.

References
Al-Sharkas, A.A., Hassan, M.K., &amp; Lawrence, S. (2008). The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on the
Efficiency of the US Banking Industry: Further Evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 35, 5070.
Aly, H.Y., Grabowski, C.P., &amp; Rangan, N. (1990). Technical, Scale, and Allocative Efficiencies in U.S.
Banking: An Empirical Investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 30, 211-18.
Anthanassopoulos, A.D. (1998). Nonparametric Frontier Models for Assessing the Market and Cost Efficiency
of Large-Scale Bank Branch Networks. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 30 (2), 172-192.
Avkıran, K.N. (2006). Developing foreign bank efficiency models for DEA grounded in finance theory. SocioEconomic Planning Sciences, 40, 275-296.
Avkıran, K.N. (1999). The Evidence on Efficiency Gains: The Role of the Mergers and Benefits to the Public.
Journal of Banking &amp; Finance, 23, 991-1013.
Ayadi, O.F., Adebayo, A. O. &amp; Omolehinwa, Eddy. (1998). Bank Performance Measurement in a Developing
Economy: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Managerial Finance, 24, 5-16.
Aysan, A.F., &amp; Ceyhan, Ş.P. (2008). Globalization of Turkey’s Banking Sector: Determinants of Foreign Bank
Penetration in Turkey. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 15, (2008).
Banker, R.D. (1984). Estimating Most Productive Scale Size Using Data envelopment Analysis. European
Journal of Operational Research, 17, 35-44.
Bergendahl, G. (1998). DEA and Benchmarks-an Application to Nordic Banks. Annals of Operations Research,
82, 233-249.
Berger, A.N., Deyoung, R., Genay, H., &amp; Udell, G. (2000). Globalization of financial institutions: Evidence
from cross-border banking performance. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 3, 23-158.
Bonin, J.P., Hasan, I. &amp; Paul, W. (2005). Bank performance, efficiency and ownership in transition countries.
Journal of Banking &amp; Finance, 29, 31-53.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., &amp; Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring efficiency of decision making units. European
Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., &amp; Thrall, R.M. (1991). A structure for classifying and chracterizing efficiency and
inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2, 197-237.
Chen, T.Y. (1998). A study of bank efficiency and ownership in Taiwan. Applied Economic Letters 5, 613-616.
Chen, X., Michael S. &amp; Brown, K. (2005). Banking efficiency in China: Application of DEA to pre- and postderegulation eras: 1993-2000. China Economic Review 16, 229-245.
Chen, T.Y. &amp; Yeh, T.L. (2000). A measurement of bank efficiency, ownership, and productivity changes in
Taiwan. The Service Industrial Journal, 20 (1), 95-109.
Cook, D. W., &amp; Seiford, L.M. (2008). Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-Thirty Years On. European Journal
of Operational Research, 19, 1-17.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L. M. &amp; Zhu, J. (2004). Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models and
Interpretations, in W.W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford and J. Zhu (edi.), Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis.
Kluwer Press: Norwell.
Das, A., Ray S.C., &amp; Nag A. (2009). Labor-use efficiency in Indian banking : A branch-level analysis. Omega,
37, 411-425.

40

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Havrylchyk, O. (2006). Efficiency of the Polish Banking Industry: Foreign Versus Domestic Banks. Journal of
Banking&amp;Finance, 30, 1975-1996.
Işık, I. (2008). Productivity, technology and efficiency of de novo banks: A counter evidence from Turkey.
Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 18, 427-442.
Işık, I., &amp; Hassan M.K. (2002). Technical, Scale and Allocative Efficiencies of Turkish Banking Industry.
Journal of Banking &amp; Finance, 26, 719-766.
Işık, I., &amp; Hassan M.K. (2003). Efficiency, Ownership and Market Structure, Corporate Control and
Governance in the Turkish Banking Industry. Journal of Finance &amp; Accounting, 9 (10), 1363-1421.
Jackson, M.P, Fethi M.D., &amp; Đnal, G. (1998). Efficiency and Productivity Growth in Turkish Commercial
Banking Sector: A Non-parametric Approach. European Symposium on Data Envelopment Analysis-Recent
Developments and Applications. 10.02.09. &lt;http://hdl.handle.net/2381/367&gt;.
Jackson, P.M., Fethi, M.D. (2000). Evaluating the technical efficiency of Turkish commercial banks: An
Application of DEA and Tobit Analysis , University of Leicester, Mimeo.
Jeon, Y., &amp; Miller, S.M. (2005). Performance of domestic and foreign banks: The case of Korea and the Asian
financial crisis. Global Economy Review, 34 (2), 145-165.
Lensink, R., Meesters, A. &amp; Naabag, I. (2008). Bank efficiency and foreign ownership: Do good institutions
matter?. Journal of Banking &amp; Finance, 32, 834-844.
Liu, S.T. (2009). Slack-based efficiency measures for predicting bank performance. Expert Systems with
Apllications, 36, 2813-2818.
Mamatzakis, E., Staikouras, C., &amp; Koutsomanoli-Filippaki, A., (2008), Cost efficiency of the banking industry
in the South Eastern European region. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18,
483-497.
Manandhar, R., &amp; Tang, J.C.S. (2002). The Evaluation of Bank Branch Performance Using Data Envelopment
Analysis: A Framework. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13, 1-17.
Mercan, M., Arnold R., Reha Y., &amp; Ahmet B.E. (2003). The Effect of Scale and Mode of Ownership on the
Financial Performance of the Turkish Banking Sector: Results of a DEA-Based Analysis. Socio-Economic
Planning Sciences, 37, 185-202.
Oral, M., &amp; Yolalan, R. (1990). An empirical study on measuring operating efficiency and profitability of bank
branches. European Journal of Operational Research, 46 (3), 282–294.
Rezitis, N. A., (2007). Efficiency and Productivity Effects of Bank Mergers: Evidence from the Greek Banking
Industry. Economic Modelling , 25, 236-254.
Sealey, C. W. Jr., &amp; Lindley, J.T. (1977). Inputs, Outputs, and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depository
Financial Institutions. The Journal of Finance, 32 (4), 1251-1266.
Sherman, H.D., &amp; Ladino, G. (1995). Managing Bank Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).
Interfaces, 25, 60-73.
Sufian, F. (2009). Determinants of Bank Efficiency During Unstable Macroeconomic Environment: Empirical
Evidence from Malaysia. Research in International Business and Finance, 23, 54-77.
Sufian, F. &amp; Abd. Majid, M.Z. (2007). Bank Performance and the Determinants of Singaporean Banks’
Efficiency. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 9, 19-39.
Thanassoulis, E. (1999). Data Enevelopment Analysis and Its Use in Banking. Interfaces, 3, 1-13.
www.tbb.org.tr
Wheelock, D.C. &amp; Wilson, P.W. (1999). Technical progress, inefficiency, and productivity change in U.S.
banking, 1984-1993. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 31 (2), 212-234.

41

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="3983">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/9683e11e1eaf47673f32afb6f4b70b6d.doc</src>
        <authentication>0034382326ea96da54d7ef03036daf29</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24653">
                <text>132</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24654">
                <text>Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Turkey: A Two Stage Data  Envelopment Analysis</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24655">
                <text>AKIN, Ahmet
KILIÇ, Merve
ZAİM, Selim</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24656">
                <text>Financial industry plays an important role in the economy and banks are  indispensable players in the financial industry. Therefore, the evaluation of banks’  performance became a popular research topic in all over the world, and also in Turkey. There  are different techniques to determine the banks’ performance. Among those techniques, Data  Envelopment Analysis (DEA), which is a non-parametric technique, has been widely used in  the banking sector. In this research, we analyzed the efficiency of Turkish Banking Industry  with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology between 2002 and 2007. All the banks  that constantly operated in the years between 2002 and 2007, excluding investment and  development, participation banks, get into the analysis. So there are four groups of banks in  the research, those are state-owned deposit banks, privately-owned deposit banks, foreign  banks founded in Turkey, and foreign banks having branches in Turkey. In the research  model, number of employees, interest expenses, non-interest expenses and total deposit are  determined as input, total credits, interest revenue and non-interest revenue are determined as  output. This analysis aims to explain the variation in efficiency scores with a set of  explanatory variables, such as size, ownership type, nationality, being publicly held.  According to results, the efficiency levels do not change very much between 2002 and 2007.  The efficiency scores reached top level in 2005 and 2006. The results of regression  application denote that all of the explanatory variables have a significant effect on banks’  efficiency levels. According to regression analysis results, size negatively affects the  efficiency levels of banks. Publicly listed banks operate more efficient than not publicly listed  banks. Foreign owned banks operate more efficient than their domestic peers. Furthermore,  state owned banks are less efficient than non-state banks.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24657">
                <text>2009-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24658">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>HB Economic Theory</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1221" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1309">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/3b4bfb2a7e1aa48e7d9e2fa42c76d68d.docx</src>
        <authentication>f3fe1455f2a116037178f31a640fe9e3</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="1310">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/043ce3e6e5d295732da22e658a71df47.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ab82ee0627c74c3a17eca64f909fe153</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="9479">
                    <text>DETERMINANTS OF CRIME RATE IN EU: A SPATIAL ANALYSIS
Gökçe Atlıhan İnce
Yavuz İnce
ABSTRACT
It is essential to ensure peace and security for sustainable development. In recent years,
economic and social factors are closely associated with the amount of increased crime, and
economic crises increase the amount of crime has become a widespread notion. The purpose of
this study is to determine how social and economic factors affect the occurrence of crime, and
investigate the effects of the crisis on crime rate.
Criminal investigations show that there is significant relation between crime and “place” of the
crime. Crime rate shows different distribution characteristics, it decreases in some places, while
increases in some places, hence; it is required a spatial perspective. Therefore, Techniques of
Spatial Economic Analysis is used in this paper. The promise of using spatial data and analyses
for crime control still remains to be demonstrated and depends on the nature of the relationship
between crime and place. Theoretical concerns focus on how place might be a factor in crime,
either by influencing or shaping the types and levels of criminal behavior by the people who
frequent an area, or by attracting to an area people who already share similar criminal
inclinations. While the crime rate in the model is the dependent variable, the net migration rate,
unemployment rate, education level and per capita gross domestic product will be used as
independent variables. Data covers the European Union countries and the year of data is 2010.
The effect of these variables is observed to determine the amount of crime and whether or not it
comes to a spatial effect is investigated. The relationship between migrations and crime is one of
the problems on which for a long time now social research has been concentrating, mainly in
countries characterized by important emigrational flows. This paper provides an empirical
evaluation of whether one can uncover a link between crimes and, economic and social variables
like unemployment rate, education level and per capita gross domestic product using a research
methodology, additionally; impacts of last economic crisis on European Union countries are
examined.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9471">
                <text>2147</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9472">
                <text>DETERMINANTS OF CRIME RATE IN EU: A SPATIAL ANALYSIS</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9473">
                <text>ATLIHAN INCE, Gokce
YAVUZ, Ince</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9474">
                <text>It is essential to ensure peace and security for sustainable development. In recent years, economic and social factors are closely associated with the amount of increased crime, and economic crises increase the amount of crime has become a widespread notion. The purpose of this study is to determine how social and economic factors affect the occurrence of crime, and investigate the effects of the crisis on crime rate.  Criminal investigations show that there is significant relation between crime and “place” of the crime. Crime rate shows different distribution characteristics, it decreases in some places, while increases in some places, hence; it is required a spatial perspective. Therefore, Techniques of Spatial Economic Analysis is used in this paper. The promise of using spatial data and analyses for crime control still remains to be demonstrated and depends on the nature of the relationship between crime and place. Theoretical concerns focus on how place might be a factor in crime, either by influencing or shaping the types and levels of criminal behavior by the people who frequent an area, or by attracting to an area people who already share similar criminal inclinations. While the crime rate in the model is the dependent variable, the net migration rate, unemployment rate, education level and per capita gross domestic product will be used as independent variables. Data covers the European Union countries and the year of data is 2010. The effect of these variables is observed to determine the amount of crime and whether or not it comes to a spatial effect is investigated. The relationship between migrations and crime is one of the problems on which for a long time now social research has been concentrating, mainly in countries characterized by important emigrational flows. This paper provides an empirical evaluation of whether one can uncover a link between crimes and, economic and social variables like unemployment rate, education level and per capita gross domestic product using a research methodology, additionally; impacts of last economic crisis on European Union countries are examined.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9475">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9476">
                <text>2013-05-24</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9477">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9478">
                <text>ISSN 2233-1565     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1547" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2111">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/6cd99a8304d30d72bc3faaa33bbb38ba.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1ce2f8a336d4f43eea925e0e63774403</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="12500">
                    <text>International Conference on Economic and Social Studies, 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Determinants of Crime Rate in EU: a Spatial Analysis
Gökçe Atlıhan İnce
Gediz University, İzmir, Turkey
gokceatlihan@gediz.edu.tr
It is essential to ensure peace and security for sustainable development. In
recent years, economic and social factors are closely associated with the
amount of increased crime, and economic crises increase the amount of
crime has become a widespread notion.
The purpose of this study is to determine how social and economic factors
affect the occurrence of crime, and investigate the effects of the crisis on
crime rate.
Criminal investigations show that there is significant relation between
crime and “place” of the crime. Crime rate shows different distribution
characteristics, it decreases in some places, while increases in some places,
hence; it is required a spatial perspective. Therefore, Techniques of Spatial
Economic Analysis is used in this paper. The promise of using spatial data
and analyses for crime control still remains to be demonstrated and
depends on the nature of the relationship between crime and place.
Theoretical concerns focus on how place might be a factor in crime, either
by influencing or shaping the types and levels of criminal behavior by the
people who frequent an area, or by attracting to an area people who
already share similar criminal inclinations. While the crime rate in the
model is the dependent variable, the net migration rate, unemployment
rate, education level and per capita gross domestic product will be used as
independent variables. Data covers the European Union countries and the
year of data is 2010. The effect of these variables is observed to determine
the amount of crime and whether or not it comes to a spatial effect is
investigated. The relationship between migrations and crime is one of the
problems on which for a long time now social research has been
concentrating, mainly in countries characterized by important emigrational
flows. This paper provides an empirical evaluation of whether one can
uncover a link between crimes and, economic and social variables like
unemployment rate, education level and per capita gross domestic product
using a research methodology, additionally; impacts of last economic crisis
on European Union countries are examined.
Keywords: Crime Rate, EU countries, Spatial Analysis.

128

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12492">
                <text>1515</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12493">
                <text>Determinants of Crime Rate in EU: a Spatial Analysis</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12494">
                <text>ATLIHAN INCE, Gokce</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12495">
                <text>It is essential to ensure peace and security for sustainable development. In  recent years, economic and social factors are closely associated with the  amount of increased crime, and economic crises increase the amount of  crime has become a widespread notion.  The purpose of this study is to determine how social and economic factors  affect the occurrence of crime, and investigate the effects of the crisis on  crime rate.  Criminal investigations show that there is significant relation between  crime and “place” of the crime. Crime rate shows different distribution  characteristics, it decreases in some places, while increases in some places,  hence; it is required a spatial perspective. Therefore, Techniques of Spatial  Economic Analysis is used in this paper. The promise of using spatial data  and analyses for crime control still remains to be demonstrated and  depends on the nature of the relationship between crime and place.  Theoretical concerns focus on how place might be a factor in crime, either  by influencing or shaping the types and levels of criminal behavior by the  people who frequent an area, or by attracting to an area people who  already share similar criminal inclinations. While the crime rate in the  model is the dependent variable, the net migration rate, unemployment  rate, education level and per capita gross domestic product will be used as  independent variables. Data covers the European Union countries and the  year of data is 2010. The effect of these variables is observed to determine  the amount of crime and whether or not it comes to a spatial effect is  investigated. The relationship between migrations and crime is one of the  problems on which for a long time now social research has been  concentrating, mainly in countries characterized by important emigrational  flows. This paper provides an empirical evaluation of whether one can  uncover a link between crimes and, economic and social variables like  unemployment rate, education level and per capita gross domestic product  using a research methodology, additionally; impacts of last economic crisis  on European Union countries are examined.  Keywords: Crime Rate, EU countries, Spatial Analysis.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12496">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12497">
                <text>2013-05-10</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12498">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12499">
                <text>ISSN 2303-4564     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="289" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="279">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/e1f52abb1e24c7a5d0bf9e02aef0d48d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e00cc43fa64d9820656c0751071991d4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2171">
                    <text>DETERMINANTS OF FIRM PROFITABILITY IN CROATIA’S
MANUFACTURING SECTOR
Lorena Škuflić
School of economics and business
Croatia
lskuflic@efzg.hr
Danijel Mlinarić
School of economics and business
Croatia
dmlinaric@efzg.hr
Marko Družić
School of economics and business
Croatia
mdruzic@efzg.hr
Abstract: This paper investigates determinants of the profitability of industrial firms in
Croatia, using data for large, medium and small companies for the period 2003-2014.
This paper provides a broad theoretical review of the determinants of profitability
analysed in economic literature with special remarks on firm level determinants,
and explanation of most used variables such as size of firm, revenues, growth rate of
revenues, sales, profit in previous years, ownership, productivity level, financial leverage,
cost of inputs, indebtedness. Results from the panel ordinary least squares model for
Croatia’s manufacturing sector reveal a positive and statistical significant relationship
between profitability, total factor productivity, and concentration measured through
Herfindahl-Hirschman index. On the other hand, indebtedness and liquidity show a
negative relationship with the firm profitability of Croatia’s manufacturing sector.
Keywords: Profitability, Determinants, Manufacturing Industry
JEL Classification: D22, L10
1. Introduction
Manufacturing industry represents a significant base for the long-term economic
growth and development of each nation’s economy, especially when it comes to a
small country which has to focus on foreign markets during its process of development.
A strong industrial base, export-oriented, competitive in the international market,
represents an economic objective of both developed and less developed
countries. It is evident that the countries, which are in the process of its economic
development, exceed from being industrial countries into being service countries,
that is, after a certain degree of achieved economic development, industrial sector
is being replaced by the service sector. Accordingly, and in the EU, there has been
a reduction in the share of manufacturing industry in the gross domestic product,
which, in the economic literature, is known as the process of de-industrialization.1
1 De-industrialization began in the mid-60s in the US and copied to Europe, and its manifestations are
reflected in reduced number of employees in the manufacturing industry as a result of increased productivity and decrease in demand towards this segment of the economy.

ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book 269

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’16)
Reduction in the share of the manufacturing industry in total national production,
regarding the number of employees, was affected by the changes in demand,
increased productivity and dynamics in trade.
The share of the manufacturing industry varies from country to country, ranging from
5.2% in value added GDP (Luxembourg, the year of 2013) to 22.2% (Germany, in 2013).
Following the trend line in the manufacturing industry since 1970 to this date the shares
have continuously declined in the European countries. In France, the share fell from
22.3% (1970) to 11.3% (2013), while significantly smaller decrease was recorded in
Germany, from 27.8% (1970) to 22, 2% (2013). The country which recorded the largest
decline in the share of value added in GDP is Luxembourg, where the share dropped
from 41.5% (1970) to 5.2% (2013) (www.unctad.org).
If the process of de-industrialization is to be observed from the of micro-entity aspect,
then it may be due to the slower growth of those companies in relation to companies
of the service sector. The cause for the slower growth lies both on the supply and the
demand side. The company, like any other living organism has its path, from starting
point to death, during which some companies grow faster, some slower, and some
stagnate. Length of the company’s existence on the market is also individual and
depends on the degree of adaptability to the environment. Companies that produce
products with higher demand, achieve faster growth rates, and with the proper cost
management they preserve better financial results, which then allow them a higher
investment rate and investment in the production process technology. This simple
explanation of profitability circle and company’s existence on the market, can be
viewed from the Firm`s Theory aspect. The level of profitability depends on the ultimate
goal of a business entity.
Firm`s Theory, observed through prism of neoclassical school of economics, focuses on
the production aspect, specifically on transformation of inputs into outputs, for which
a level of technology and market environment, in which entities work, are important
in terms of pricing and volume of production, and the market plays an important
role on the output side in the design of consumer behaviour. The neoclassical theory
company is based on market analysis models of perfect and imperfect competition,
and within these other market structure on the analysis of oligopoly and monopoly,
and monopolistic competition. The neoclassical theory company believes that the
company is also the entrepreneur who is at the same time unified function of owner
and manager, and whose main goal is to maximize profit, or to achieve maximum
possible difference between total revenue and total costs. An entrepreneur makes
the decision on how many inputs to be employed in order to achieve the planned
level of production, taking into consideration the price of inputs and output prices on
the market. Hence, in the basis of neoclassical theory, property and institution have no
influence on the company’s goal, as well as on the amount of knowledge, technology
and cost-effectiveness (as summarized set of production capabilities). For each level
of output, the entrepreneur determines that quantity of input that will minimize the
expenses, but only output, through which the maximum profit is achieved, is considered
to be the balanced level of production, which presents the rational behaviour of
entrepreneurs.

Generally, by reducing the agriculture share, country carries out a higher level of national income and
fewer people are employed in that sector, while the employment in the industry increases and so its share
in value added, which gives way to the service sector after a certain stage. This process is associated with
the reallocation of resources from less to more effective productions which implies structural changes.

270 ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book

�Regional Economic Development: Entrepreneurship and Innovation
All mentioned provides importance of profitability determinants for firm` performance
and on the other hand, undoubted influence on the economy in the whole.
Manufacturing industry in Croatia is the important contributor to the Croatian
economic growth, especially in the past. It is arguable that the impact of determinants
of profitability, throughout the world, is not similar on the firm` financial performance
in every country that gives different influence on all stakeholders. Such reason gives
motivation for this research which include quantitative data of all manufacturing
companies in Croatia for over 11 years, from 2003 until 2014. All data gathered from
FINA database. According to that, the aim of this research is to determine which
microeconomic factors influence on the profitability of firm`s in Croatian manufacturing
industry.
The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents review of microeconomic
determinants of firm profitability what includes theoretical background and related
literature with discuss on main characteristics and relations. Section 3 gives extensive
overview of methodology, used models and explanation of research results of
determinants of profitability. At the end, Section 5 concludes the article and gives
main points of research with recommendations for further researches.
2. Review of Microeconomic Determinants of Firm Profitability
The connections between the profitability determinants and profitability of companies
are well represented in previous researches. Most common question is what drives
firm profitability unrelated to the firms’ essence. According to that, models of firm
profitability can be classified into two major groups, structure-conduct performance
(SCP) and firm effect models (Škuflić, Mlinarić and Družić, forthcoming). There has been
a huge volume of literature to date that has sought to identify the determinants of firm
profitability. Here are some of them. Gringer and McMKiernan (1991) focused on the
determinants of profitability and showed that market share, capital intensity, growth
of sales, working capital and decentralization play a significant role in explaining
firm profitability. Brush et al. (1999) find that company and industry affect business
profitability, but company has the larger influence. In addition to the size of the firms,
and investment, some of the other determinants have also affected profitability,
such as lagged profitability, a significant determinant of current profit margins, and
that industry concentration is positively related to firm profits margins. Further, profit
margins are found to be pro cyclical in concentrated industries but counter cyclical
in less concentrated industries (McDonald, 1999). Similar, Feeny (2000) found a strong
connection of a positive association between capital intensity, size and profitability.
In addition, Nunes, Serrasquerio and Sequeria (2009) found a positive relationship
between size, growth and profitability. Moreover, they concluded that higher liquidity
will not decrease profitability. On the other hand, lower level of debt and lower level
of fixed assets are more profitable. Depending on the research, firm-level or industryspecific effects are found to be the dominant factor on firm profitability. According
to the all mentioned next Table briefly shows microeconomic determinants and their
indicators of firm` profitability.

ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book 271

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’16)
Table 1: Microeconomic determinants of firm profitability
Determinants

Indicators

1. Lagged profitability

- net profit from previous year

2. Firm` size

- total assets; number of employees

3. Firm growth in industry

- growth rate in operating income from the sale of company/growth rate in operating income of the industry

4. Age

- years of firm existence

3. Ownership

- share of state ownership
- share of foreign ownership
- cost of production
- share of material costs in total costs
- growth rate of material costs

4. Cost management

- share of labor costs in total costs
- growth rate of labor costs
- cost of I&amp;R
- cost of advertising
- financial leverage
- leverage ratio
- net debt/EBITDA

4. Leverage ratio; capital structure

- self-financing coefficient
- net debt ratio
- share of loans in equity
- EBIT/interest coverage ratio

5. Working Capital Productivity; Multifactorial Productivity

- operating income/working hours
- operating income/capital

6. Tax burden

- paid taxes/total costs

7. Export oriented firm

- amount of export

8. Import dependence

- share of import in total sales

9. Human capital

- number of high educated employees

10. Quotation on the stock exchange and EPS

- dividends per share
- annual growth (decline) rate of market price shares

11. Current ratio
12. Regional affiliation (location)

Table 1 shows microeconomic determinants of firm` profitability with their indicators
what is in continuation thoroughly explained with all significant literature and authors.
CONCENTRATION
Generally, in theory of industrial organization it is well known that concentration
indicators are good approximation for market power, with positive correlation. There
are a lot of researches about positive correlation, one of them is shown in „Oligopoly
Theory“ of Stigler (1964). It is demonstrated positive correlation between profit
maximization and relative firm size. Saving (1970) also showed same but in correlation
272 ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book

�Regional Economic Development: Entrepreneurship and Innovation
between firm` shares and Lerner index. Same results are shown also in Encaoua and
Jacquernin (1980). According to that, most used approximation of concentration are
Herfindahl-Hirschman index and concentration index, with positive correlation, what
is in accordance with SCP paradigm (see: Bain, 1951; Demsetz, 1973; Peltzman, 1977).
Most important concentration indicators, are briefly described below.
Concentration index represents sum of market shares of k number of firm`s.

This indicator shows share of total revenues or sales of firm in total revenues or sales of
an industry. It is possible to calculate market shares of 4, 8, 20 or even 50 largest firms
in the industry. The most common concentration ratios are the and the . Next Table
shows classification of market structures for concentration ratio .
Table 2: Classification of market structures for concentration ratio
Market structure
0=

Perfect competition

40 &lt; &lt; 0

Monopolistic competition

60 &lt; =&lt; 40

Weak oligopoly

=&lt; 60

Extremely oligopoly

=&lt; 90

Monopoly

Herfindahl-Hirschman index is defined as the sum of the squares of the market shares
of the firms within the industry, with equation

The Herfindahl index provides a more complete picture of industry concentration than
does the concentration ratio. Here are advantages of HHI:
a) HHI gives distribution of markeet shares of four (or eight) firms and compozition
of market not just for larger firms.
b) HHI also gives more weight to larger firms, respectively it recognizes interction
between larger concurents.
Table 3: HHI classification of market structures
HHI

Imperfectly competitive market structure

HHI &lt; 1000

Monopolistic competition

HHI &lt; 1800 &lt; 1000

Monopolistic competition or oligopoly

HHI &lt; 1800

Oligopoly or monopoly

SIZE
In theoretical and empirical economic literature, within the framework of current
researches, issues of correlation of company’s size and profitability are indispensable. A
variety of researches, as the main evidence of importance of company’s size arguments,
that the average cost of operating a small business is higher than the average cost of
operating large enterprises (Agiomirgianakis et al., 2013) so it is necessary to observe
the relationship between the two variables. Large enterprises have higher levels of
ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book 273

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’16)
profitability when compared to small ones, primarily due to economy of scale. On the
other hand, small enterprises are often new players on the market, so they take over
market shares and profits of large companies (Papadogonas, 2007). According to
above mentioned, and considering the majority of studies that show the significance
of company’s size to its level of profitability (see Dwyer et al., 2010), we can generally
state and assume a positive correlation. According to RBV theory, the positive
correlation between company’s size and profitability, is a result of the more accessible
access to capital and of suitability for utilization of the economy of scale’s principles,
which ultimately leads to higher profitability. Furthermore, other studies also confirm
the hypothesis of positive correlation: Gschwandtner (2005), Nunes et al. (2009), Fukao
(2006), Asimakopoulos et al. (2009), Stierwald (2010). The most common choice for
company’s size variable comes down to property size, number of employees and total
sales, of which one of the most frequently used according to (Hirschey, 2008) is total
sales.
LAGGED PROFITABILITY
Getting back to prior period assets, is mentioned in literature as an indispensable
determinant because the lagged profitability is related to profitability of the next
period. Positive correlation is expected, which has been confirmed in the works of
Bothwell et al. (1984) and Fenny and Rogers (1999).
AGE
In the framework of the resource based view theory, RBV (see Jovanovic, 1982;
Wernerfelt, 1984), where specific determinants of business enterprise have the greatest
significance, it is assumed that the older the company is it can potentially acquire more
resources (Autio, 2005), and the older the company is, it possesses higher amounts of
information and more experience, enjoys a better reputation and it is enabled to have
wider and better access to financing. However, there are a multitude of studies which
confirmed the negative relationship of age and profitability, where as an important
argument, the lag of older companies to market changes and innovations have been
highlighted (Glancey, 1998). According to studies determinant of age can have a
positive and a negative impact on profitability.
INDEBTEDNESS
Generally, indebtedness does not have to have only negative impact on profitability.
Namely, if the borrowed funds are invested in products / services which bring an
additional income, with the average profit values, indebtedness will in the long term
have a positive impact on profitability. Thus, theoretical studies provide complex and
intertwined answers on the impact of debt on profitability.
The impact of debt on profitability can be divided according to three basic relations
(Kebewar, 2012):
a) Signal theory which assumes a positive impact of debt on profitability;
b) The theory of agency costs: b1.) The correlation is positive if the capital’s agency
costs are between the owners and manager, b2.) The correlation is negative if
the agency costs of debt are between owners and lenders;
c) The tax aspect - correlation is unpredictable, complex and depends on the tax
evaluation of interests, income tax and tax valuation.
274 ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book

�Regional Economic Development: Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Such dual points of view are confirmed by the results of empirical researches, where
the negative impact has been proved by Majumdar and Chhibber (1999), Eriotis et
al. (2002), and Ngobo Capiez (2004), Goddard et al. (2005), Rao et al. (2007), and
Tian Zeitun (2007) and Nunes et al. (2009). On the other hand, a positive impact has
been proved by Baum et al. (2006, 2007), Berger and Bonaccorsi (2006), Margaritis
and Psillaki (2007).
The high rate of invested capital refund reflects the real state of the market, namely
its imbalance. The degree of profitability is one of the most important indicators of
market power. Studies, that tried to prove the connection between capital refund,
industry concentration and also entry barriers, have been carried out. Weiss (1974)
determined the link between profits, concentration and entry barriers. Salinger (1984)
demonstrated that the MES in concentrated industries is linked with capital refunds,
while this link was not found with other entry barriers variables such as the level of
advertising (Carlton and Perloff, pp. 260-261).
The capital structure, according to Bos and Fethersonu (1993), affects the profitability
and the companies’ risk. There are several debt ratios used in studies within the
capital structure. Muhammad (2003) concludes in his paper, that a certain level of
indebtedness is desirable, but an excessive level leads to financial turmoil. It uses
indicators such as the ratio of total indebtedness in relation to properties, total capital
debt and long-term debt in relation to capital. Ventoura (2002) proves that the ratio
of debt and capital has a negative effect on profitability. Finally, literature on the
effect of capital structure and profitability states that there are certain circumstances
in which the ratio is positive and also negative.
FIRM GROWTH IN INDUSTRY
According to Greiner (1972) growth of the company in relation to the profitability can
have a positive and a negative effect. In case of a negative ratio, the cause is found
in violation of interpersonal relationships within the company due to the increased
growth of demands for increasing formal relations in order to achieve the necessary
efficiency, which in the short term represents a challenge for the achievement of
the desired level of profitability. The positive effect is explained by the increased
motivation of employees that, given the growth in the future, they will achieve set
goals and thus affect profitability. There are few studies which would undoubtedly
lead to a defined impact of the company’s growth on the profitability, for example
Roper’s (1999) and Gschwandtner’s (2005) study, whose results studied a statistically
insignificant relationship between growth and profitability of the company. However,
a positive relationship can be considered more natural as evidenced in the work of
Serrasqueiro (2009).
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
High quality and comprehensive display for the significance of the ownership structure
to the company’s management was given in the work of Berle and Means (1932),
which demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of public ownership. Since
then, there are many studies that speak in favor of one or the other ownership structure,
but there are also studies that have shown no effect (positive or negative) of property
to profitability as in Demsetz and Lehn (1985), Himmelberg et al. (1999), Demsetz and
Villalonga (2001), Holderness and Sheehan (1988) and Denis and Denis (1994). Shirley
ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book 275

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’16)
and Walsh (2000) explain the differences in company management, depending on
the type of ownership. Finally, it is not possible to unambiguously determine the impact,
because there are examples and studies for both types although it is expected that
the companies in private ownership are more efficient and therefore more profitable.
IMPORT DEPENDENCE
According to Peltonen et al. (2008) import can have two different effects on profitability.
First of all, it can influence in the way that it increases competitiveness on the market
and consequently reduces profitability. It can also affect the competitiveness of
companies which will ultimately increase profitability. By using the dynamic panel
model Peltonen et al. (2008) demonstrated a negative and significant relationship
between imports of goods and profitability. Such attitude is confirmed by the works of
Sauner-Leroy (2003) and Boulhol (2005). Hansson (1992) determines a different result
with respect to geographic region (country) in which the company operates.
In summary, studies researching the determinants of profitability have identified several
factors in many countries. However, they do not clearly indicate which factors are the
most significant in relation to the firm profitability, although different factors have been
identified as determinants of profitability in different countries by using the different
methods of study. This is an area this research intends to explore.
3. Methodology, model and research results
The analyzed period covers the years 2003-2014, for which the data were available.
However, for our sample of companies relevant data are not abundant. All data
gathered from Croatian database FINA. The FINA database contains tax return
information on an annual basis. Each year all of entities in Croatia return data on their
income, expenses, and other financial activities.
The results have to be evaluated with the fact that some entities in sample may be
used for tax planning purposes rather than for reporting the financial activities of a
particular line of business. The use of tax entities for accounting purposes will affect
the results of an investigation of the determinants of entity profitability using economic
variables. This has influenced our choice of explanatory variables, as discussed above,
but also a method of estimation. We have applied the panel data analysis method,
using the unbalanced sample to obtain the estimated coefficients.
It is well known that determinants are product of specific characteristics of industry
and at the end economy, namely different variable has different impact and relation
with profitability with other intensity (Škuflić, Mlinarić and Družić, forthcoming). This
research employed the most important factors that influence firms profitability and
that are commonly utilized through the previous researches. The variables and their
used measurements are presented in Table 1. The dependent variable is profitability as
measured by net profit before tax. As independent variables consider (1) indebtedness
(Debt/EBITDA); (2) concentration (Herfindahl-Hirschman index); (3) liquidity (Current
ratio); (4) productivity (Total factor productivity); (5) indebtedness (Indebtedness
factor).

276 ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book

�Regional Economic Development: Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Table 4: Variables and measurement
Dependent variable

Measurement

Profitability

Net profit before tax

Symbol

Independent variables
Indebtedness

Debt/EBITDA

ldug_EBITDA

Concentration

Herfindahl-Hirschman index

lhhi2

Liquidity

Current ratio

lkoefteklik

Productivity

Total factor productivity

LTFP

Indebtedness

Indebtedness factor

lfak_zad

Further, while current studies do indicate that panel data analysis is more suitable than
other methods of study in determining the profitability of manufacturing companies
(Pratheepan, 2014). Therefore this study also hopes to explore the relative importance
of determinant of profitability by using the panel data analysis.
Panel data (also known as longitudinal or cross sectional time-series data) is a dataset
in which the behavior of entities are observed across time. Panel data allows you to
control for variables you cannot observe or measure like cultural factors or difference
in business practices across companies; or variables that change over time but not
across entities. This is, it accounts for individual heterogeneity. With panel data you
can include variables at different levels of analysis suitable for multilevel or hierarchical
modeling. Some drawbacks are data collection issues, non-response in the case of
micro panels or cross-country dependency in the case of macro panels.
Usage of fixed-effects (FE) is appropriate in analyzing the impact of variables that
vary over time. FE explore the relationship between predictor and outcome variables
within an entity. Each entity has its own individual characteristics that may or may not
influence the predictor variables. When using FE we assume that something within the
individual may impact or bias the predictor or outcome variables and we need to
control for this. This is the rationale behind the assumption of the correlation between
entity’s error term and predictor variables. FE remove the effect of those time-invariant
characteristics so we can assess the net effect of the predictors on the outcome
variable. Another important assumption of the FE model is that those time-invariant
characteristics are unique to the individual and should not be correlated with other
individual characteristics. Each entity is different therefore the entity’s error term and
the constant (which captures individual characteristics) should not be correlated with
the others. If the error terms are correlated, then FE is no suitable since inferences may
not be correct and you need to model that relationship (probably using randomeffects), this is the main rationale for the Hausman test. (Torres-Reyna, 2007)

ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book 277

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’16)

For the sample of our research, the fixed effects method is more appropriate than the
random effects. This assumption was also formally tested. Breusch-Pagan Lagrange
multiplier test is based on verification and selection an appropriate model between
Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) or random model. The null hypothesis is when is the
variance between the entities (in this case firms) zero, i.e., what implies that there is
no panel effects, what allows us to conclude that the usual OLS is suitable method.
However, the test result suggest rejection of the null hypothesis with on all levels of
reliability, what implies that random model is more appropriate. Further, Hausman test
helps us in making decision about better model between fixed and random. Main
point is about whether the errors are correlated with regression. The null hypothesis
presupposes that they are not, what goes in favour of random model, but if results
are opposite, more appropriate is fixed model. The result of Hausman’s test indicates
rejection of the null hypothesis at all levels of significance, and fixed effects is better
model than random effects. Nevertheless, we have concluded that the fixed effects
method should be applied in this case. The results of the estimation are presented in
the following table:
Table 5: Results of Breusch &amp; Pagan and Hausman tests
Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects
lPrfPRO[ID,t] = Xb + u[ID] + e[ID,t]
Estimated results:

4.771073
.7250876
1.14926

lPrfPRO
e
u
Test:

Var

2.184279
.8515208
1.072036

Var(u) = 0

chibar2(01) = 63918.40
Prob &gt; chibar2 =
0.0000

Coefficients
(b)
(B)
fixed
random
ldug_EBITDA
lfak_zad
lkoefteklik
LTFP
lHHI2

sd = sqrt(Var)

-.1819732
-.6143266
-.2401719
.0075825
.3131585

-.1885957
-.583628
-.2354695
.0086374
.35242

(b-B)
Difference

sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B))
S.E.

.0066225
-.0306986
-.0047024
-.0010549
-.0392615

.0041334
.0033769
.0037796
.0002127
.0034747

b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg
B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg
Test:

Ho:

difference in coefficients not systematic
chi2(5) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B)
=
235.38
Prob&gt;chi2 =
0.0000

278 ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book

�Regional Economic Development: Entrepreneurship and Innovation
The results of panel Ordinary Least Square (OLS), random effects, between effects and
fixed affects are reported in Table 6. The basic equation for our model is as follows:

Table 6: Results of panel data analysis method
)1(

)2(

)3(

)4(

VARIABLES

OLS

Random

Between

Fixed

ldug_EBITDA

***-0.306

***-0.189

***-0.364

***-0.182

)0.0151(

)0.0122(

)0.0381(

)0.0128(

***-0.455

***-0.584

***-0.356

***-0.614

)0.0132(

)0.0105(

)0.0338(

)0.0111(

***-0.199

***-0.235

***-0.231

***-0.240

)0.00688(

)0.00690(

)0.0145(

)0.00787(

***0.0109

***0.00864

0.00499

***0.00758

)0.00229(

)0.00156(

)0.0128(

)0.00158(

***0.383

***0.352

***0.362

***0.313

)0.00149(

)0.00241(

)0.00307(

)0.00423(

***15.15

***15.05

***14.96

***14.85

)0.0142(

)0.0204(

)0.0343(

)0.0256(

Observations

63,496

63,496

63,496

63,496

R-squared

0.625

0.620

0.462

12,888

12,888

lfak_zad
lkoefteklik
LTFP
lHHI2
Constant

Number of ID

Standard errors in parentheses
*** p&lt;0.01, ** p&lt;0.05, * p&lt;0.1

12,888

The Table above shows dependent variable with profitability which is represent with
net profit before tax and five independent variables. All variables are significant on
1%. Concerning statistical significance, estimated parameters and Breusch &amp; Pagan
and Hausman tests we have used fixed effects panel models. There is a positive and
significant relationship between concentration which is represent with HerfindahlHirschman index and productivity with measurement in total factor productivity
with dependent variable (profitability). Contrarily, there is negative and also strong
significant relationship between indebtedness which is represent with ratio of debt and
EBITDA, liquidity with current ratio and indebtedness factor and profitability. Further
more, final and concrete conclusion about relation between profitability and selected
microeconomic determinants in Croatian manufacturing industry are given in below.
If we change indebtedness by one percent, we would expect profitability to change
by -0,182%, in average. If we change Herfindahl-Hirschman index by one percent, we
would expect profitability to change by 0,313%, in average. If we change current ratio
by one percent, we would expect profitability to change by -0,24%, in average. If we
change indebtedness factor by one percent, we would expect profitability to change
by -0,614%, in average. If we change total factor productivity by one percent, we
would expect profitability to change by 0.00758%, in average.

ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book 279

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’16)
The results showed evidence of a strong positive significant relationship between
profitability and Herfindahl-Hirschman index and total factor productivity. The strongest
negative correlation with profitability has indebtedness factor, followed by current
ratio and indebtedness.
4. Concluding remarks
Particularities of manufacturing industry, in general sense, considering the changes in
macroeconomic and microeconomic indicators with their relation puts determinants
of firm profitability for high level of importance for firm`s profitability in Croatia. The main
contribution of this paper is the identification of the determinants affecting profitability
of manufacturing firms in Croatia. A static panel model method is utilized on a sample
of all manufacturing firms with business in Croatia covering the period between 2003
and 2014.
Parameter coefficients show that market concentration (Herfindahl-Hirschman index)
and total factor productivity had a significant and positive impact on the profitability
for the manufacturing industry in Croatia during the study period. The results also
showed a significant but negative relationship between indebtedness, current ratio
and indebtedness factor. This results implies that concentration and indebtedness
factor are determinants with larger influence on profitability and next researches have
to absorb that facts. Further, provided results are in line with previous studies in the
same area but for future researches we should pay attention to some notes from this
research. First of all, there are restrictions about selection of the determinants (different
number of determinants give different results), picked econometric tools and usage of
different variation of panel (dynamic) models. Inclusive, it is common knowledge that
the profitability determinants of manufacturing firms are very important according to
the economic development of any country, especially to countries adopting an export
what includes oriented industrialization policy within an open economic environment,
according to that, more researches in this area are necessary.
References
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Agiomirgianakis, G. M., Magoutas, A. I. i Sfakianakis (2013). Determinants of
Profitability in the Greek Tourism Sector Revisited: The Impact of the Economic
Crisis, Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, 12-17.
Autio, E. (2005). Toward a Theory of International New Ventures, Journal of
International Business Studies, Vol. 36 No. 1, 9-19.
Berle, A. i Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property.
Chicago
Bos, T. i Fetherson, T. A. (1993). Capital structure practices on the specific firm.
Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 10, 53-66.
Boulhol, H. (2005). Why Haven’t Price-Cost Margins Decreased with Globalization?,
Mimeo
Brush, T. H., Bromiley, P. and Hendrix, M. (1999). The relative influence of industry
and corporation on business segment performance: An alternative estimate.
Strategic Management Journal. 20(6), 519-547.
Demsetz, H. i Lehn, K. (1985). The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and
Consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93, 1155-1177.
Demsetz, H. i Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership Structure and Corporate
Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance 7, 209-233.
Denis, D. i Denis, D. (1994). Majority Owner-managers and Organizational
Efficiency. Journal of Corporate Finance 1, 91-118.

280 ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book

�Regional Economic Development: Entrepreneurship and Innovation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•

Dwyer, L., Forsyth, P. i Dwyer, W. (2010). Tourism Economics and Policy, Channel
View Publications, London, European Central Bank, Online Statistical Database
Economics, 13, 235-252.
Fenny, S. i Rogers, M. (1999). The Performance of Large Private Australian
Enterprises, Working Paper No. 2/99, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economics
and Social Research, University of Melbourne
Glancey, K. (1998). Determinants of Growth and Profitability in Small Entrepreneurial
Firms, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, Vol. 4 (1),
18-27.
Greiner, L. (1972). Evolutions and Revolutions as Organizations Grow, Harvard
Business Review, 50, 37-46.
Grinyer, H. P. and McKiernan, P. (1991). The determinants of corporate profitability
in the UK electrical engineering industry. British Journal of Management, 2(1), 1732.
Gschwandtner, A. (2005). Profit Persistence in the ´Very` Long Run: Evidence
From
Hansson, P. (1992) The discipline of imports: The case of Sweden, The Scandinavian
Journal of Economics, Vol. 94, No. 4, 589-597.
Himmelberg, C., Hubbard, G. i Palia, D. (1999). Understanding the Determinants
of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Performance.
Journal of Financial Economics 53, 353-384.
Holderness, C. i Sheehan, D. (1988). The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly
Held Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 317-346.
Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the Evolution of Industry, Econometrica, Vol.
50 No. 3, 649-70.
McDonald, J. T. (1999). The determinants of firm profitability in Australian
manufacturing. The Economic Record, 75 (229), 11-126.
Muhammad M. (2003). The relationship between economic growth and capital
structure of listed companies: evidence of Japan, Malaysia and Pakistan. The
Pakistan Development Review, 42:4 Part II, 727-750.
Papadogonas, T. (2007). The Financial Performance of Large and Small Firms:
evidence from Greece, International Journal of Financial Services Management,
Vol. 2, No. 1/2, 14-20.
Peltonen, T. A., Skala, M., Rivera, A. S. i Pula, G. (2008). Imports and profitability in
the euro area manufacturing sector – The role of emerging market economies,
WPS 918, ECB
Pratheepan, T. (2014). A panel data analysis of profitability determinants
empirical results from Sri Lankan manufacturing companies. International Journal
of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. 2, Issue 12.
Roper, S. (1999). Modelling Small Business Growth and Profitability, Small Business
Sauner-Leroy, J.-B. (2003). The impact of the implementation of the Single Market
Programme on productive efficiency and on mark-ups in the European Union
manufacturing industry, European Economy, European Commission DirectorateGeneral for Economic and Financial Affairs, Economic Papers, No 192
Schmalensee, R. (1989). Intra-industry profitability diferendec in US manufacturing
1953-1983, Journal of Industrial economics, June 1989, No. 4, Volume XXXVII
Serrasqueiro, Z. (2009). Growth and profitability in Portuguese companies: A
dynamic panel data approach. Economic Interferences, Vol. 11, Num. 26, 565573.
Shirley, M., Walsh, P. (2000). Public versus Private Ownership: The Current State
of the Debate. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2420 Survivors and
Exiters, Applied Economics, 37, 793-806.
ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book 281

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’16)
•
•
•
•

Škuflić, L., Mlinarić, D. and Družić, M. (2016). The determinants of profitability:
evidence from Croatian construction sector. (forthcoming)
Torres-Reyna, O. (2007). Panel Data Analysis Fixed and Random Effects using
Stata. Princeton Univesity
Ventoura-Neokosmidi, N. (2002). Sales efforts, capital structure and monopoly
power. Managerial Finance, Volume 28, No. 5
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm, Strategic Management
Journal, Vol. 5 No. 1, 171-80.

282 ICESoS 2016 - Proceedings Book

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2165">
                <text>3328</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2166">
                <text>DETERMINANTS OF FIRM PROFITABILITY IN CROATIA’S  MANUFACTURING SECTOR</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2167">
                <text>Skuflic, Lorena
Mlinaric, Danijel
Druzic, Marko</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2168">
                <text>Abstract: This paper investigates determinants of the profitability of industrial firms in  Croatia, using data for large, medium and small companies for the period 2003-2014.  This paper provides a broad theoretical review of the determinants of profitability  analysed in economic literature with special remarks on firm level determinants,  and explanation of most used variables such as size of firm, revenues, growth rate of  revenues, sales, profit in previous years, ownership, productivity level, financial leverage,  cost of inputs, indebtedness. Results from the panel ordinary least squares model for  Croatia’s manufacturing sector reveal a positive and statistical significant relationship  between profitability, total factor productivity, and concentration measured through  Herfindahl-Hirschman index. On the other hand, indebtedness and liquidity show a  negative relationship with the firm profitability of Croatia’s manufacturing sector.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2169">
                <text>2016</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2170">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3002" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3770">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/1c6b895704384d8b1cc4dec738becddd.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a5f7661d67172e97d7edbfc302e9607d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="23203">
                    <text>2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

Determinants of Firm Survival in Manufacturing Industry:
A Research on Lake Region in Turkey

Hakan DEMĠRGĠL
Assis.Prof.Dr.,Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
demirgil@iibf.sdu.edu.tr
Murat KARAÖZ
Assoc.Prof.Dr., Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
mkaraoz@akdeniz.edu.tr
Bekir GÖVDERE
Assis.Prof.Dr., Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
bgovdere@iibf.sdu.edu.tr
Muhlis CAN
Res.Assist., Hakkari Üniversitesi, Hakkari, Turkey
muhliscan@hakkari.edu.tr

Abstract: This paper gives an empirical analysis of determinants of firm survival in the
manufacturing sector of Lakes Region (Turkey) from 2003 to 2009. The survival activities of
the firms are measured through a four-dimensional, namely firm based, industry/environment
based, innovation based and human capital based, questionnaire consisting of 49 questions.
For the application logistic regression method is used for the evaluation of survival
probability and the findings are compared with the basics of the related literature.
According to the results of the empirical work, the effects of the ―Firm Based‖ factors
on the survivals and growth performances of the firms located in the region are found to be
more significant and positive than the remaining dimensions.

Introduction
Studies, depending on market entry and exit dynamics, have emphasized on the importance of the the
high turbulence level in the industry in recent years. Applies to all sectors and all the economies, most of the new
companies stop their activities a few years after entering to the markets. Chance of firms‘ survival and improving
their performance for growth depend on following successful strategies which can be adaptable to changing
environmental conditions.
The difference in survival rate of firms till to the 1980s has not been got attention in the literature as
deserved. However, after 80s, there has been an increasing interest in performance of the firms to survive and the
studies have focused on the determinants of survival. The relationship between scale and growth rate were
investigated in the studies, related to the performance levels of firms in the 1950s and 1960s by using firm-level
data. However, nowadays, the studies gives particular importance to firm-level factors which effect the survival
rate. Economists have started to use the market selection models which affect the survival of firms to explain the
empirical findings. Based on previous studies of the factors, affecting the survival of companies, can be
classified under three categories :
1-) Firm-based factors
2-) Industry-based factors
3-) Local factors
At a level in firm-based , the most important and best-known variables that affect the chance of firms‘
survival are firm‘s age and its scale. The changes in the scale of the firms occuring in the course of time also
reflect the interactions between entry and exit. The most important determinants of the survival chance at a level
in the industry are market scale and growth rates, technology properties and product life cycles.
Among these three categories, human capital and local factors are evaluated with different measurement in the
literature of survival. Human capital is generally a variable related to individual characteristics of the the owner‘s
of the company, entrepreneur‘s, manager‘s and employee‘s (Van Praag 2002). Therefore, in the analysis of

210

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

survival of the firms, human capital variables is not used whether in local or regional level (Acs and Armington
2006). Human capital is evaluated in the firm-based level because of reflecting its own specific effects.
In addition to these three categories, especially at the end of the 90s, the impact of the innovative efforts
of companies to survive has started to take over. Innovation in a changing environment will provide a
competitive position to the company and this will increase the firm‘s potential for being successful in the market.
This effect is important for both the firms that are operating in the industry and the firms being freshly
established and enter to the market. Innovation can not only increase the chance of survival of new firms by
means of enabling them to enter suitable niche markets but also reduce the negative effects of tecnologies which
are new and devoloping or desructive upon the avaliable firms.

Determinant Features of Survival of Firms
Classifying of the factors affecting survival in the industry-based and firm-based would be appropriate
to form a starting point. Industrial attributions include both time-based factors and external variables which show
the effects amidst the markets. This scope is a result of the form and rate of technical changes and different
demand attributions. Therefore, affecting the survival of firms, owned properties are regarded as internal factors
(Agarwal and Gort 1997). The other important point should also be noted that the survival of the firms is seen as
a function of the variables of the firm and variables of the industry.
The entering to the market and existing of the firms from the markets are important process which
affects the degree of competition / efficiency and evolution of the industry. These two cases have important
impacts on the distribution of resources, increasement of productivity with innovation rate and renewal of the
industry. Although, existing of firms from markets have both social and economical effects, the number of
studies is very low regarding factors which determine the risk of exist. Factors which increase the effectiveness
of the company are the important determinants of survival as well (Perez et al.2004). Most of the recommended
practices which increase the probability of survival are expanding export rates and increasing R &amp; D activities (
providing information about foreign markets, guiding in entrance to the market and providing export structure,
support policies into investment R &amp; D )
Determinants of survival of the firms which newly enter are avaliable in industrial organization
literature. According to Geroski (Geroski 1995), one of the important points related to market entry are age and
scale which are directly related with the chance of firm‘ s survival. As first put forward by Stinchcombe
(Stinchcombe 1965), new firms are faced with ― barrier to being new‖ and this is a risk of failure compared with
large firms. During the period of starting, the firms are faced with the problem of completion in efficieny levels
and organizational effectiveness to maintain their speed in the same level with competitors. In order to overcome
this case, obtaining of capital and labour force, establishment of business connections with suppliers and finding
of customers for products are essential points.
The studies related to entry and exit of the firms, performance after entry and evolution of industry do
not fully deal with the location, especially the role of region at the time of entry. The problems of the countries in
which the risk ratio is different in local center and out of city center and where the economic activities are
intensive in only a few local center can be eliminated by application of the development policies. Location
selection is the most important strategic decisions of the company at the begining. A large part of the new firms
which start operations are located in clusters where the firms have particular relations between each other and
where the institutions are geographically concentrated (Pe‘er and Vertinsky 2006).
Scale and scope not only allow the creation of organizational capital, but also provide different benefits.
Scope provides diversity in the organizational capital while scale gives the depth to the organizational capital. A
larger scale and scope of the firm can increase chance of survival when faced with problems of money,
connections and provide benefits such as work Schedule (Bercovitz and Mitchell 2007).
There are some structural factors such as firm‘s age and its scale which play important role in the
industrial economy. Differences among the chance of survival among the firms are seen the results of the
selection process. Experience will increase the chance of firm‘s survival and therefore, life curves of the firm has
extended with the scale of the firm.
Innovation may increase chances of the firms‘ survival by contributing to the development of appropriate
strategies. The existing firms in the market is also under risk because of recession/ fluctuation in the industry that
are results of tecnological changes occurring in its nature. Innovation activities increase their abilities to being
alive permanently.
Level of competition, demand predictability, the rate of tecnical change and its structure vary among different
industries and these affect the chance of survival. The industry characteristics affecting the survival can be
analyzed in two groups (Agarwal and Gort 1997):

Specifications for all products in this group vary in course of time or more distinctly, in the
period of consecutive product life cycle.

211

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo


In the second group, industrial properties change between industries thanks to all stages of
the life cycle or a large part of life cycle.
The conditions of industry at the time of entry have two significant reasons for firms which newly enter to the
industry. Firstly, the firms must make large irremeable investments in order to compete with the firms which are
already exist in the industry. If the firms flunk out from the industry, these investments would be appraised as
sunk costs and it is considered that these investments affect dynamics and profitabilitiy of the company.
Therefore, identification of industry‘s conditions that reflect the nature of cost at the time of entry enable to
understand how this kind of structural barrier effect the performance after entry.
Having a high human capital attributes of entrepreneur will decrease the ambiguities about the
efficiency level and also enable to firm to adapt market condition and enable faster at the time of arranging the
capacity so this will reduce the probability of exit. The entrepreneurial human‘s impact on the success of new
firm may start before establishment. The entrepreneurs, who have opportunity to capture lucrative market and
have ability to access relevant information, get the advantages because of past experience.
High level of previous experience is not only increasing economic performance, but also opportunity of
obtaining of entrepreneurs and the expected income level of entrepreneurs in alternative business sectors.
Therefore, a skilled entrepreneur performs better when he works for himself, also he will have high performance
that he needs to go on his business life (Gimeno et al. 1997). Has previously worked in similar industries or
individuals who set up a new company in the same region, command the organization of firm associated with
business environment, relational features of sector and contex of sector (Santarelli and Vivarelli 2007).
One of the factors that increase the survival of institution which is related to founder, owner and
employees level of education can be found in lots of studies. The founder of firm can be accepted as the first
builder of organization‘s both structure and strategy. The role of the founder is inevitably an important position
in capitalist economy. When viewed from this aspect, the level of education of the founder should be considered
as one of the important determinant affecting the performance of the firm (Nelson 2003).

Research
Research Sample
The universe of firms located in Lake District region are in manufacturing industry. The number of
firms in the sample set is 60. This sample was used in Dr.Bekir Sami Oğuztürk dissertation thesis titled ― The
Role of Innovation in Regional Development and a research in Lake District‖. The firms which were applicated
in survey in the sample set are compared after 5 years with a new survey which was prepared by us to investigate
the cases whether they are survive or not.
39 of 60 firms are located in Isparta, 21 of them are located in Burdur. The survey of the study was
applicated by meeting individually with each firms owner, partner, manager, department manager of the firms
including active or not active at that time. 12 of the firms (20% of the sample) in the sample ended their activity
in 2008.

Construction
Timber
Textile
Cosmetic
Food
Bait
Machine
Gun
Tarımsal Sulama
Total

ISPARTA
3
6
13
4
8
1
4
39

BURDUR
3
8
8
1
1
21

Table 1. The Sectoral Distribution of Sample Firms
Sample included firms in other sectors of the provincial distribution are included in Table 1. Looking at
the sectoral distribution of firms, in both provinces is seen as a condensation on the timber industry. Wood
products industry is identiy of the region. The industry has a long history in the region and this industry which
has provided value added to the region for many years and has also included a large portion of employment.
Naturally, in the set of sample, most of companies are performing in timber industry in both cities. Looking at
the city-level, after timber sector, 2nd intensive industry is textile in Isparta. The reason is city‘s past experience

212

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

in carpet and yarn, and also having infrastructure. In Burdur, most of firms are performing in timber industry and
in machine industry. Considering high agricultural production level in Burdur, it has a considerable potential in
the production of agricultural equipment and machines.

Research Data
The source of data for study is a survey, consisting of 39 questions about firms‘ survival and growth
performance, was applied to the firms between June-July 2008. This survey consists of four main headings: firm
information, product and sales information, staff information working in branch, firm‘s innovation performance.
Moreover, the data belongs to 2003 was obtained from survey which was used in dissertation thesis of Dr.Bekir
Sami Oğuztürk.
Influential factors on the growth performance of firms for survival analysis will be collected under four
main headings to be used for the growth analysis by making totalitarian evaluation. The headings under which
analysis of growth are categorized as firm characteristics, industry / environmental characteristics, innovation
activities and human capital ( for entrepreneurs and workers).
Variables, grouped under four headings, have detailed explanations above. The symbols and the use of variable
are presented in Table-2
VARIABLES
Exit (EXT)

DEFINITION
For the survived firms 1
Otherwise
0

Firm Age (AGE)

For the survived firms difference between founding
date and year 2008, for the exit firms difference
between founding date and exit date.

Firm Size (SIZE)

Number of employees in 2003 at the firm

Export (EXPRT)

For the exporter firms
1
Fort he non-exporter firms 0

Diversification (DVSF)

Number of plant, branch office and bussiness concerns
ecept headquarter

Minimum Efficient Scale (MES)

Proportion number of emplyees at the firm to number
of employees in own sector.

Industrial Growth (IGRWT)

Mean of sectoral growth rates fort he last four years

Location (LCT)

Isparta ilinde faaliyet gösteren firmalar için 1, Burdur
ilinde faaliyet gösteren firmalar için 0.

Innovation Activities (INNO)

Ġf the firm has bought/developed;
a-) A new product ,
b-) A new production system and/or technology 1
Otherwise 0

Patents/Industrial Design (PTNT)

Number of patents and/or industrial design certificate

Research and Development (RD)

For the regular R&amp;D activities 1
Otherwise 0

Educational Level of Employees (ELE)

(Graduate employment)/(Total employment)

Table 2. Variables Used In The Analysis
Logistic regression model ( logit) will be used to distinguish the survival firms and failed firms in 5
years period after 2003. Logit model is explained as below with estimation of a specific event / fact with β
probality parameters.

213

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

(1)
In logit model, β coefficient is calculated by maximum probabilty method. Thus, taking into consediration of the
firm‘ s situation within a specific period, it is possible to calculate the probability of firms‘ survival.

Results
The main features of firms being inclusive of sample are shown in Table 3. Accordingly, in the region,
the firms' average age was 26 and this age level shows that most of the firms were founded in the early 80s and
90s while the industrialization was accelerated in Turkey. The firms in the region have an avarage level of
foreign sales opportunity. 57% of firms are exporting. In terms of employees or scale, firms are in middle sizes
(average number of employees is 73). Although there is no setted innovative structure and culture, 42% of the
firms are engaged in informal R&amp;D activities. Although the structure of firms are generally limited liability and
joint-stock company, the most prominent characteristic for all the firms is family business. Finally, it is observed
that 83% of the firms‘ founders in the sample have experience in the same or different sectors as an
entrepreneurial.

COMPANY
STRUCTURE
EXT
AGE
SIZE
EXPRT
DVSF
MES
IGRWTH
LCT
INNO
PTNT
RD
ELE

NUMBER OF
OBSERVATIONS

MEAN

STANDART
DEVIATION

60

1.13

0.34

60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60

0.8
26.03
72.78
0.56
1.88
47.84
7.35
1.35
0.53
0.45
0.41
9.27

0.40
22.25
103.2
0.49
1.7
15.4
7.46
0.48
0.50
2.65
0.49
8.64

MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1
(Corporate)
0
3
7
0
1
10
-3.07
1
0
0
0
0

2
(Individual)
1
153
431
1
11
100
19.17
2
1
20
2
38.71

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics
The correlation analysis will be made in order to see whether there is a directly relationship amidst
explanatory variables which cause an increasement in the estimate values‘ of standart errors of parameters before
making econometric analysis. Table 4 contains the results of correlation analysis.
When we examine the values of co-efficient resulted from correlation analysis, it can be seen that there
is no highly relationship which can cause multicolinearity problem between independent variables. Table 2 will
also help us to see the direction of relationship between firms growth rate and survival chances with independent
variables
The Stata 1.9 statistical program was used for all models while the researh findings are being obtained. In the
findings section, the determinants which affect the firms‘ survival including firm-based, industry and
environment-based, human capital and innovation-based, growth perfomance factors will be examined with an
order.

214

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

EXT AGE SIZE EXPRT DVSF MES IGRWTH LCT INNO PTNT RD
EXT
AGE
SIZE
EXPRT
DVSF
MES
IGRWTH
LCT
INNO
PTNT
RD
ELE

1
0.32
0.05
0.25
0.28
-0.02
0.09
-0.15
0.08
0.05
0.28
0.26

1
0.18
0.18
0.13
-0.12
0.14
-0.14
-0.01
0.20
0.38
0.41

1
0.44
0.04
0.29
-0.46
-0.33
-0.01
0.16
0.12
0.13

1
0.29
0.23
-0.35
-0.12
-0.13
0.32
0.29
0.11

1
-0.01
-0.12
0.01
-0.03
0.33
0.05
0.43

1
-0.54
-0.24
0.07
-0.21
-0.20
-0.13

1
0.46
-0.07
-0.08
0.22
0.01

1
0.01
0.10
-0.16
-0.19

1
0.18
0.18
0.15

1
0.29
0.37

ELE

1
0.28 1

Table 4. Correlation Analysis

EXT
AGE

Coefficient
0.08

Std.Dev.
0.05

z
1.59

P&gt;|z|
0.11

SIZE

0.00

0.01

-0.68

0.50

DVSF

3.49

1.64

2.14

0.03***

EXPRT

2.36

1.45

1.63

0.10

MES

0.00

0.05

-0.03

0.98

IGRWTH

0.26

0.12

2.08

0.04***

LCT

-3.84

2.05

-1.87

0.06**

RD

-0.73

1.42

-0.52

0.61

PTNT

-1.15

0.60

-1.93

0.05**

INNO

1.23

1.22

1.01

0.31

ELE

0.06

0.10

0.64

0.52

Constant

-2.46

3.69

-0.67

0.51

Significance Level: *=%10, **=%5, ***=%1
Number of obs =
60
Pseudo R2
= 0.4877
LR chi2(11)
=
29.29
Log likelihood = -15.381425
Prob &gt; chi2
= 0.0020
Table 5. Factors Affecting Firms‘ Survival
Effects of variables on sırvival probabilities of firms are respresented in Table 5. Accordingly, DVSF,
IGRWTH, LCT and PTNT variables has significant effects. The mos striking result is that PTNT variable has
significant and negative effect. But, only four firms has patent application and even more these firms has exited.
ThereforePTNT is not a robust variable with which we could observe the concrete effects of the patent ectivities
of the firms on their survival opportunities.

Conclusion
There are a lot of factors which affect the performance of the companies. The majority of factors are
stochastic such as war, natural disasters, change of government, fluctuations in the stock market etc. In this
study, the systematic factors which are thought as having an impact in the process of firms survival and the
direction of these affects are investigated. The factors including firm, industry, innovation and human capital that
affect the performance of firms operating in Lake District are identified by econometric analysis.
The results obtaining from emprical analysis clearly demonstrate that new and small-scale firms‘
importance. The results show that generally firms in the region continue their activities, and grow under the

215

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

traditional factors. Survival results related to literature do not show very large differences. Source of the
differences is the variables which do not show significance in the Lake District sample set. Generally, opening
branches for going to path differentiation are usually carried out by large firms. However, a large part of the
firms going to path differentiation in Lake Region are consisting of small and medium sized firms. This case is
one of the important difference that shows small and junior firms in the region perform better.

References
Acs, Z.J., &amp; Armington, C. (2006). Entrepreneurship, Geography and American Economic Growth. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, p.45.
Agarwal,R., &amp; Gort, M. Firm and Industry Attributes as Determinants of Survival. JEL:O30, L20, p.2.
Bercovitz,J., &amp; Mitchell, W. (2007) When is More Better? The Impact of Business Sale and Scope on Long Term Business
Survival, While Controlling for Profitability. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.28, 61-79.
Geroski,P., (1995). What Do We Know about Entry?. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, Vol. 13, 421-440.
Gimeno J., T.B. Folta, A.C. Cooper, &amp; Woo, C.Y. (1997) Survival of the Fittest? Entrepreneurial Human Capital and the
Persistence of Underperforming Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (4), p.756.
Nelson T., (2003). The Persistence of Founder Influence: Management, Ownership and Performance Effects at Initial Public
Offering. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, p.707.
Pe‘er, A., &amp; Vertinsky, I. (2006). The Survival Value of Clusters for De Novo Entrants. Academy of Management Best
Conference Paper, 2006, BPS:N1, p.1.
Perez,S.E., A.S. Llopis, &amp; Llopis, J.A.S. (2004) The Determinants of Survival of Spanish Manufacturing Firms. Review of
Industrial Organization, Vol.25, p.251.
Santarelli E., &amp; Vivarelli, M. Entrepreneurship and the Process of Firms‘ Entry, Survival and Growth. Industrial and
Corporate Change, 16 (3), 461-463.
Stinchcombe, A. L., (1965) Social Structure and Organizations. in J. G. March, ed., Handbook of Organizations. Chicago:
Rand-McNally, 142-193.
Van Praag, C.M. (2002). Business Survival and Success of Young Small Business Owners. Small Business Economics, 21
(1), p.3.

216

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23197">
                <text>159</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23198">
                <text>Determinants of Firm Survival in Manufacturing Industry:  A Research on Lake Region in Turkey</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23199">
                <text>DEMİRGİL, Hakan
KARAÖZ, Murat
GÖVDERE, Bekir
CAN, Muhlis</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23200">
                <text>This paper gives an empirical analysis of determinants of firm survival in the  manufacturing sector of Lakes Region (Turkey) from 2003 to 2009. The survival activities of  the firms are measured through a four-dimensional, namely firm based, industry/environment  based, innovation based and human capital based, questionnaire consisting of 49 questions.  For the application logistic regression method is used for the evaluation of survival  probability and the findings are compared with the basics of the related literature.  According to the results of the empirical work, the effects of the ―Firm Based‖ factors  on the survivals and growth performances of the firms located in the region are found to be  more significant and positive than the remaining dimensions.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23201">
                <text>2010-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23202">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>HB Economic Theory</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="458" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="475">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/38b2bcec896ec2e96b6772379ae18849.pdf</src>
        <authentication>64236b52013013320d8a0036def1cabe</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="3514">
                    <text>Journal of Economic and Social Studies

Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical
Analysis for Turkey
Huseyin Kalyoncu
Meliksah University
Turkey
hkalyoncu@meliksah.edu.tr
Nadide Tuluce
Meliksah University
Turkey
ntuluce@meliksah.edu.tr
Zeynep Ozturk Yaprak
Meliksah University
Turkey
zyaprak@meliksah.edu.tr

Abstract: This paper aims to investigate empirically
the determinants of FDI for Turkey over the
annual period of 1975-2012. Our main interest
is to study how different reflecting inflows of FDI
in Turkey are. This study examines time series
data evidence concerning empirical relevance
between FDI attraction and its determinative
effects. As a definition, FDI is a direct investment
into production or business in a country by an
individual or company of another country, either
by buying a company in the target country or by
expanding operations of an existing business in that
country. Unit root and Johansen cointegration
tests are used in order to analyze the determinants
of FDI for Turkey. Our econometric model expresses
foreign direct investment (FDI), as a function of
market size (GDP), openness (OPEN) calculated as
Export + Import/ GDP, inflation rate (CPI), energy
production (EP), labor productivity (LABOR). The
major results show that there is a positive effect of
GDP, OPEN, EP and LABOR on FDI. But CPI’s
effect on FDI is negative in the long run.

Volume 5 Number 2 Fall 2015

Keywords: FDI; Time Series; Cointegration
JEL Classification: F21, C22
Article History
Submitted: 19 November 2014
Resubmitted: 1 July 2015
Resubmitted: 29 July 2015
Resubmitted: 8 September 2015
Accepted: 9 September 2015
http://dx.doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS15524

41

�Huseyin Kalyoncu, Nadide Tuluce, Zeynep Ozturk Yaprak

Introduction
Economic development of a country depends on utilization of resources for increasing
productive capacity. In many developing countries, utilization of resources is rendered
impossible by the scarcity of domestic capital. One of these economic problems of
developing countries is that they do not have enough national savings to finance their
investments. They are in constant need of foreign capital in forms of both direct and
indirect investments. Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a process whereby the residents
of the source country attain ownership of assets with the intention to control the
production, distribution and other activities of a firm in the host country (Khachoo
and Khan,2012). Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a way of international loan, by
which those countries that have better investment opportunities at the present borrow
from those that have capital surplus.
FDI can be a crucial instrument to foster economic growth. FDI provides developing
countries with the much needed capital for investments and enhances job creation,
managerial skills and transfer of technology for less developed countries. Furthermore,
FDI encourages technological development and also support the accumulation of
physical capital.
FDI plays a significant role in the development of international trade, and it helps to
establish direct, stable, and long-lasting links between economies. The Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) states that; FDI can serve as an
important vehicle for local enterprise development, strengthening the competitiveness
of both the recipient and investor (Groh and Wich, 2012). For example, Turkey in
particular is pursuing further political and monetary integration with Europe. In that
case maintaining a government effectiveness that is conducive to foreign investment
and increases comparative advantage is integral to its integrationist aspirations.
The significance of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows is well documented in
literature for both the developing and developed countries. Foreign Direct Investment
(FDI) inflows to developing countries have been substantially increasing and, compared
to other capital flows, have remained the largest component of net resource flows to
developing countries. FDI is a key element in international economic integration. FDI
creates direct, stable and long-lasting links between economies. As a definition FDI
is a direct investment into production or business in a country by an individual or
company of another country, either by buying a company in the target country or
by expanding operations of an existing business in that country. It encourages the
transfer of technology and know-how between countries, and allows the host economy
to promote its products more widely in international markets (Todaro, 1994).
The role of foreign direct investment in the development of Turkish economy cannot
be over emphasized. Foreign direct investment provides capital for investment; it
enhances job creation and managerial skills, and possibly technology transfer.

42

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis for Turkey

We shall present our analysis with a brief history of the Turkish economy. Today, Turkey
is one of the most attractive investment destinations for foreign investors. It benefits
from a unique strategic location; a young, dynamic and skilled workforce, and a stable
political and economic environment. Turkey received foreign investment inflows of only
US$18m 33 years ago when it started to host foreign investors. Now, the cumulative
value of foreign investments has surged to US$138.3b. While the aggregate volume
of foreign investment inflows totalled only US$14.6b during the 80-year period from
the establishment of the Turkish Republic to 2003, this figure rose to US$123.7b
during the last decade. In other words, Turkey attracted 8.5 times more foreign inward
investment over the last decade than it did in the previous 80 years. Turkey now plays
a significant role in the global economy and world trade, standing out as a promising
emerging market alongside Brazil, Russia, India and China. This status is underpinned
by its robust local market and young population. Despite the global economic crisis
and the political and social issues that have afflicted neighbouring regions, Turkey
exported more goods in 2012 than ever before. Total exports valued at US$152.6b
were supplied to 241 countries and regions worldwide. The well-trained and loyal
workforce played a notable role in achieving this success. Turkey offers another layer of
opportunity by serving as a frontier to other regions.
Figure 1 shows the total amount of FDI inflows to Turkey in US Dollar at current
prices and current exchange rates in millions. FDI flows to Turkey have been increased
largely after 2004. FDI flows into Turkey fell in 2009 due to the global crisis similar
to most developed and developing countries. After then FDI started to increase again.
Figure 1. FDI Inflows to Turkey (US dollars in millions)

Source: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, own construction

Volume 5 Number 2 Fall 2015

43

�Huseyin Kalyoncu, Nadide Tuluce, Zeynep Ozturk Yaprak

Table 1. FDI Inflow to Turkey by Year (USD million)
2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

FDI Total (Net)

9,099

16,176

13,282

12,457

12,530

Equity Investments (Net)

6,221

14,146

10,126

9,298

8,445

Inflows

6,256

16,137

10,759

9,866

8,699

Liquidation Outflows

35

1,991

633

568

254

Intra -company Loans*

384

17

520

110

-236

Real Estate (Net)

2,494

2,013

2,636

3,049

4,321

*Loans of companies with foreign capital are given by foreign partners (www.tcmb.
gov.tr)
Source: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (TCMB), Electronic Data Delivery
System, Outstanding External Debt and Balance Of Payments Statistics
According to the UNCTAD 2014 World Investment Report, Turkey has become
the largest recipient of FDI in West Asia, and is among the fifteen most promising
investors for 2014-2016. The country has adopted a series of legislative reforms to
facilitate the reception of foreign investment, such as the creation of Investment
Support and Promotion Agency of Turkey (ISPAT), a showcase effort undertaken to
attract foreign operators. FDI inflows improved in light of the development of publicprivate partnerships for major infrastructure projects, the measures to streamline
administrative procedures and strengthened intellectual property protection, the end
of FDI screening and the structural reforms carried out with a view to the future
accession into the EU. In 2014, Turkey announced a major national infrastructure
development plan that should attract major foreign investment. In 2014, the joint
venture of Koc Holding (Turkey) and Fiat (Italy) invested USD 300 million in developing
automobile production. Also, a number of Chinese companies have invested up to
USD 385 million in the electricity distribution company OEDAS. Finally, a Japanese
group has invested USD 500 million in a steelworks plant in collaboration with a Turkish
company. The countries of the European Union, the Gulf States and the United States
are among the main investors in Turkey. The business climate deteriorated in
2014 according to the Doing Business report of the World Bank, the country losing 4
places (55th out of 189 countries). However, FDI amounted to USD 12.5 billion in
2014, an increase on 2013 (Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, 2014).
There exists vast literature on determinants and effects of FDI. The issue has increased
in importance due to strong globalization processes. Many developed and developing
countries try to attract FDI to support their economic growth and development.
Dunning’s eclectic paradigm (1993) was initiating the investigation of the locational
advantages of the host countries e.g., income levels, market size, skills, infrastructure,
political and macroeconomic stability that determines cross-country pattern of FDI.
The determinants of FDI have been analyzed in the literature in many studies.
Numerous theoretical and empirical studies (Agarwal, 1980; Brainard, 1993;1997;
Gastanaga et. al., 1998; Ekholm, 1998; Zhang and Markusen, 1999; Barros and

44

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis for Turkey

Cabral, 2001; Chakrabarti, 2001; Moosa, 2002) on the determinants of FDI lead us
to select a set of explanatory variables that are widely used and found to be significant
determinants of FDI. For example Markusen and Maskus (1999), Love and LageHidalgo (2000), Lipsey (2000), Lim (2001), and Moosa (2002), Asiedu (2006), Cleeve
(2008), Mhlanga et al. (2010), Vijayakumar et al. (2010), Wang and Swain (1995), Liu
(1997), Dees (1998) and Cheng and Kwan (1999) highlight how the domestic market
size can relate to the location of FDI.
Mainardi (1992) emphasizes the level of importance and growth prospectus of the real
per capita GDP in taking investment decisions in a region. Lunn (1980), Schneider
and Frey (1985), Culem (1988), Cheng and Gastanaga (2001) and Cleeve (2008),
Mohammed and Sidiropoulos (2010) discuss the positive effects of GDP growth rate
proxy of market growth. To foreign investors who operate in industries characterized
by relatively large economies of scale, the importance of the market size and its growth
is magnified. This is because they can exploit scale economies only after the market
attains a certain threshold size. The most widely used measures of market size are GDP,
GDP/capita and growth in GDP. The coefficients are usually positive.
One of the determinants of FDI is labour cost. Labour cost is one of the major
components of the cost function, it is mentioned that high nominal wage, other things
being equal, deters FDI. This is true for labour-intensive production sectors. Therefore,
conventionally, the expected sign for this variable is negative. The studies that find
no significant or a negative relationship of wage and FDI are: Goldsbrough (1979),
Saunders (1982), Kravis and Lipsey (1982), Flamm (1984), Wheeler and Mody,
(1990), Sader (1993), Lucas (1993), Tsai (1994), Wang and Swain (1995), Barrell and
Pain (1996), Cheng and Kwan (1999) and Botric and Skuflic (2006) sign that lower
wages attract FDI positively. Nonetheless, there are other researchers who have found
out that higher wages do not always deter FDI in all industries and have shown a
positive relationship between labour costs and FDI (Moore, 1993; and Love and LaveHidalgo, 2000). Because higher wages indicate higher productivity, hi-tech research
oriented industries in which the quality of labour matters, prefer high-quality labour
to cheap labour with low productivity. Coughlin and Segev (2000) and Cheng and
Gastanaga (2001), by the OLS method, indicate that labour productivities and rate of
capable labours have positive impact on FDI.
Recently, a few researchers have also studied the impact of specific policy variables on
FDI in host countries. One of these policy variables is openness of trade. Gastanaga,
Nugent, and Pashamova (1998) and Asiedu (2002) focus on policy reforms in
developing countries as determinants of foreign direct investment inflows. They find
corporate tax rates and degree of openness to foreign direct investment to be significant
determinants of FDI. Kravis and Lipsey (1982), Culem (1988), Edwards (1990), Sun
(2002), Kuo and Huang (2003), Asiedu (2006), Cleeve (2008), Mhlanga et al. (2010)
find significant positive effects on FDI also. Schmitz and Bieri (1972) and Wheeler and
Mody find insignificant effects of openness on FDI.

Volume 5 Number 2 Fall 2015

45

�Huseyin Kalyoncu, Nadide Tuluce, Zeynep Ozturk Yaprak

For foreign investors, economic stability of home country is very important. The
economic stability conditions affect the profitability of investment projects. Therefore,
foreign investors seek countries which have economic stability. One of the economic
stability proxies is inflation rate. Low inflation policies are often offered to multinationals
as an incentive to attract FDI inflows. Empirical studies (Schneider and Frey, 1985;
Asiedu, 2006; Mohammed and Sidiropoulos, 2010) indicated a negative relationship
between inflation and FDI.
Likewise the effect of infrastructure on FDI flows is a fairly well-studied topic although
the direction and magnitude of influence is generally positive. Biswas (2002) claimed
that quality of infrastructure should increase FDI into the host country. He used
phone lines per 1000 inhabitants for proxy of infrastructure. Similarly, Vijayakumar
et al. (2010) also acknowledge that infrastructure index effects FDI positively.
Looking at the fundamental determinants, Markusen (2002) argues that there are two
factors that turn out to be crucial for the existence of horizontal FDI: the size of the
local markets and the marginal production cost in the case of producing directly in
the host market. The first factor is evident: firms invest abroad to serve the local host
market. Therefore, the size of the local demand (known also as market size or market
potential) will be a determinant for the firm’s investment decision. The second factor,
the level of local production costs, will determine whether the firm produces locally
to sell locally or it supplies the host market by exporting its home-based production.
A large number of studies have been conducted to identify the determinants of FDI
but no consensus view has emerged in the sense that there is now idely accepted
set of explanatory variables that can be regarded as the “true” determinants of FDI.
Chakrabarti (2001) attributes the lack of consensus to“the wide differences in
perspectives, methodologies, sample-selection and analytical tools”.
Research on FDI has been one of the most crucial areas of international economics.
Although there is sizeable research on the determinants of FDI, empirical studies on
FDI in developing countries such as Turkey are relatively scarce.
This study is important because Turkey had experienced declining and fluctuating
foreign investment inflows. Besides, Turkey alone cannot provide all the funds needed
to invest in various sectors of the economy. The objective of this study, therefore, is to
identify the long run relationship between FDI and some macroeconomic variables.
To accomplish this purpose, in this work we have reviewed empirical evidence on
the relationship between FDI and other economic variables. This study has modelled
FDI with macroeconomic variables in Turkey. The objective of this paper has been to
focus solely on the relationship between FDI inflows and macroeconomic variables
for Turkey. Cointegration technique, proposed by Engle and Granger (1987) and
extended by Johansen (1988), has been applied to evaluate the long-run hypothesis
that our variables are cointegrated. The basic idea is that individual time series wander
considerably but economic forces tend to make these series stationary. Given the basic
economic model, FDI has been hypothesized to be cointegrated with the economic
growth, openness, inflation and electricity consumption.

46

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis for Turkey

Finally, we employed cointegration approach to determine the long-run factors
contributing to FDI in Turkey. It is important to use this approach in our cointegration
test as, during the sample period, the Turkish economy has been subject to serious
economic developments.
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 begins by illustrating the inherently
multivariate nature of cointegration analysis: several variables must be involved, and
this determines the form of the statistical tools required. Section 3 explains econometric
methodology. Section 4 presents empirical result. Section 5 concludes.
Model Specification and Data
The determinants of FDI have been analyzed in the literature in many studies using
different models. In order to investigate empirically, the determinants of FDI for
Turkey following empirical models were used:

FDI t = β 0 + β1GDPt + β 2 OPEN t + β 3 CPI t + β 4 E
P t + u t 		

(1)

FDI t = β 0 + β1GDPt + β 2 OPEN t + β 3 CPI t + β 4 LABORt + u t

(2)

where t denotes time, and the variables are defined as:
•
•
•
•
•
•

FDI denotes the net foreign direct investments in flows as % of GDP,
GDP is gross domestic product (US$) (proxy of market size) ,
OPEN is openness index (total trade -export+ import / GDP),
CPI is consumer price index (annual % - proxy of inflation-as an indicator of
macro economic instability)
EP is electricity production (kWh-proxy of availability of infrastructures)
LABOR is labour productivity (real output divided by total labour input)

The data obtained from the World Development Indicators is in yearly format and
spans a period of 1975-2012 except labour productivity data. This data has been taken
from the OECD online database. The time span allows us to use 38 observations for
our time series analysis. E Views 8 is used for all estimations. All data are expressed in
real terms.
As a first step, we estimate a VAR system for Turkey. We use the Schwarz’ Information
Criteria statistics to choose the lag-length. As a general check of our specification we
always checked whether the residuals follow a normal distribution, and whether there
is any heteroscedasticity or serial correlation. We moved to the cointegration test only
after the residuals were homoscedastic and normally distributed. As for the form of the
cointegration vector, we preferred to assume that our data is difference stationary and
there is no linear deterministic trend in our data.

Volume 5 Number 2 Fall 2015

47

�Huseyin Kalyoncu, Nadide Tuluce, Zeynep Ozturk Yaprak

Methodology
By bridging the gap between domestic savings and investment and bringing the latest
technology and management know-how from developed countries, foreign direct
investment (FDI) can play an important role in achieving rapid economic growth in
developing countries (Mottaleb and Kalirajan, 2010). To shed light on the potential
drivers of FDI to Turkey, we perform cointegration methods. Before modelling the
data, we consider its basic stationary properties. The preliminary step of our analysis
is to check the time series variables are stationary or non-stationary. Most of the
time series data generally have trend, cycle, and/or seasonality. By removing these
deterministic patterns, the remaining series must be stationary. Therefore, a test of
the null hypothesis of non-stationarity is conducted via the well-known Dickey-Fuller
procedure. Stationarity in a time series implies to a condition where the series has
a constant mean and constant variance. This implies that the mean and variance of
stationary time series do not vary over time. We first study the stationarity property of
the time-series variables used in the study.
The first step in statistical testing the non-stationarity of time series data is to test for
random walk. Testing this means to find out whether the variables contain unit root.
This is also called the Unit Roots Test.
As discussed earlier using the non-stationery series in estimating relations may give
spurious results. In case the first difference is stationary (has no unit root) then the
series is described having integration of order 1 and is denoted I(1). If two time series
are integrated of order or I(1), it is well known that the correlation coefficient between
them will tend towards plus or minus unity, whether an economic relationship between
them exists or not. One important property of variables having I(1) property is that
their linear combination can be I(0). This means the linear combination non-stationary
series of I(1) can be stationary. These variables are described as cointegrated variables.
A necessary condition for testing for a long-run relationship between variables is
that these variables are I(1), i.e., stationary in first differences. We, therefore, use the
classical unit root tests, namely, the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test (Dickey and
Fuller, 1981; Said and Dickey, 1984). ADF test is based on the null hypothesis that a
unit root exists in the time series.
The null hypothesis is that the variables in question contain unit root and the alternative
hypothesis is that the variables are trend stationary. The ADF statistics suggests that all
variables are I (1).
To determine whether a long-run relationship exists foreign direct investment,
economic growth, openness, inflation rate and electricity production are considered.
We must not only test whether both variables are integrated of the same order, but we
need to find evidence for a cointegration. Here we apply the JJ (1990) procedure to test
for the presence of a cointegration.

48

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis for Turkey

Once it is established that series are I(1), we can proceed to test for a long-run
relationship between the series. If such a relationship exists, series are cointegrated. To
achieve this, we start out with the vector auto regression approach of Johansen (1988)
and Johansen and Juselius (1990).
In the JJ method, two tests are used to determine the number of cointegrating vectors
(r): the trace test and the maximum eigenvalue test. In the trace test, the null hypothesis
is that the number of cointegrating vectors is less than or equal to r, where r is 0, 1,
or 2. In each case, the null hypothesis is tested against a general alternative. In the
maximum eigenvalue test, the null hypothesis r = 0 is tested against the alternative that
r = 1, r = 1 against the alternative r = 2, etc.
Empirical Results
We first perform unit root tests in levels and first differences in order to determine
univariate properties of the series used in this study. We, therefore, use the classical unit
root tests, namely, the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test. The ADF test is based on
the null hypothesis that a unit root exists in the time series.
The null hypothesis is H0: φ = 0 and the alternative hypothesis is H1: φ ≠ 0. First
order integrated series can present stationary linear combinations (I(0)). In these cases,
we say variables are cointegrated. It means there is a long-run equilibrium linking the
series, generating a kind of coordinated movement over time.
In the light of econometric setting presented in the previous section, the empirical
results are discussed in this section. The analysis is started by the test of the stationarity
properties of the data series. This is the prime requirement for cointegration causality
test. The results are presented in Table 1. It is evident from the table that the calculated
ADF statistics are less than their critical values in all cases, suggesting that the variables
are not level stationary.
The results indicate that for Turkey, all the variables are non-stationary in their levels but
stationary in their first differences. This means that we can proceed with the Johansen
cointegration tests for these countries.
However, they are stationary in their first differences. The values in brackets indicate
the lag structure in ADF. The Schwarz’s Information Criterion (SIC) was used to
determine the number of lags for the cointegration tests. These results indicate that the
cointegrating technique has to be applied in order to analyse the long-run relationship
between these variables. Johansen and Juselius (JJ) (1990) cointegrating method is
utilized for this purpose.

Volume 5 Number 2 Fall 2015

49

�Huseyin Kalyoncu, Nadide Tuluce, Zeynep Ozturk Yaprak

Table 2. Unit Root Test Results

Series

ττ

Level

First Difference

τµ

τµ
τµ

ττ

τµ

FDI

-0.548250 (0)

2.915183 (0)

-5.352229 (5)*

-3.912278 (0)*

GDP

-1.170291 (0)

1.763019 (0)

-5.987356 (0)*

-5.330377 (0)*

OPEN

-2.763083 (0)

-1.052409 (0)

-5.417465 (0)*

-5.497118 (0)*

CPI

-2.390373 (0)

-1.973490 (0)

-7.225054 (0)*

-7.080614 (0)*

LABOR

-2.441679 (6)

-2.449072 (6)

-7.004778 (1)*

-7.127342 (1)*

EP

-2.301159 (0)

0.545275 (0)

-6.302344 (0)*

-6.109945 (0)*

Source: Author’s own calculations.

Note: The t statistics refer to the ADF tests. The subscripts μ and τ indicates the models
that allow for a drift term and both a drift and a deterministic trend, respectively.
Asterisk (*), shows significance at 5% level. Figures in parentheses indicate the lag
length. The critical values are obtained from MacKinnon (1991) for the ADF test.
ADF test examines the null hypothesis of a unit root against the stationary alternative.
The Johansen cointegration test identified cointegrating relationship between FDI
inflows and explanatory variables. To find which variables adjust to the long run
cointegrating relations, we focus on cointegration in the Vector Autoregressive model
(VAR). The VAR model will provide a feasible empirical system for the analysis of our
integrated economic time series.
Before undertaking cointegration tests, let us first specify the relevant order of lags (p)
of the vector autoregression (VAR) model. The Schwarz’s information criterion (SIC)
is used to determine the optimal lag length. The SIC criterion yield a VAR (3) for two
models.
Having confirmed the existence of unit roots for all the data series, the next step is to
check possibility of long run equilibrium relationship between them. The cointegration
test is applied for the same at the individual level as well as panel level. The Johansen’s
maximum likelihood test has been applied. The estimated results of Johansen’s test are
reported in Table 2. The results from the trace and max-eigenvalue test are reported in
the tables below together with the normalized cointegration vector:

50

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis for Turkey

Table 3. Johansen-Juselius Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Tests
Model I: FDI t = β 0 + β 1GDPt + β 2 OPEN t + β 3 CPI t + β 4 E
P
Trace Test

t

+ ut

Maximum Eigenvalue Test

Null

Alternative

Statistic

95 %
Critical
Value

Null

Alternative

Statistic

95 %
Critical
Value

r=0

r≥1

136.02

69.81

r=0

r=1

53.05

33.87

r≤1

r≥2

82.96

47.85

r≤1

r=2

40.41

27.58

r≤2

r≥3

42.55

29.79

r≤2

r=3

24.90

21.13

r≤3

r≥4

17.65

15.49

r≤3

r=4

17.63

14.26

r≤4

r≥5

0.012

3.84

r≤4

r=5

0.01

3.84

Source: Author’s own calculations.

Model II: FDI t = β 0 + β 1GDPt + β 2 OPEN t + β 3 CPI t + β 4 LABORt + u t
Trace Test

Maximum Eigenvalue Test

Null

Alternative

Statistic

95 %
Critical
Value

Null

Alternative

Statistic

95 %
Critical
Value

r=0

r≥1

176.0855

69.81889

r=0

r=1

82.56708

33.87687

r≤1

r≥2

93.51844

47.85613

r≤1

r=2

47.27528

27.58434

r≤2

r≥3

46.24316

29.79707

r≤2

r=3

26.15473

21.13162

r≤3

r≥4

20.08843

15.49471

r≤3

r=4

18.41811

14.26460

r≤4

r≥5

1.670316

3.841466

r≤4

r=5

1.670316

3.841466

Source: Author’s own calculations.

Notes: We have employed the Schwarz’s information criterion (SIC), in the
determination of lag length in the VAR model.
The cointegration tests confirm our initial hypothesis regarding the long-run
relationship between FDI and other variables. For the first model, the implementation
of the JJ procedure indicates that there is a long-run equilibrium relationship among

Volume 5 Number 2 Fall 2015

51

�Huseyin Kalyoncu, Nadide Tuluce, Zeynep Ozturk Yaprak

FDI, GDP, OPEN, CPI and EP. Also there is a long-run equilibrium for the model
two.
Table 4. Estimates of Long-Run Cointegrating Vectors
FDI

GDP

OPEN

CPI

EP

1.000

732,5

8.66E-10

-73,96

0,265

(243,1)

(1,6E-09)

(33,8)

(0,57)

FDI

GDP

OPEN

CPI

LABOR

1.000

624.19

1.30E-09

-45.68

5.74

(6.9E-10)

(26.12)

(20.92)

(128.36)
Source: Author’s own calculations.

Note: Numbers in parentheses are standard errors.
Estimates of long-run cointegrating vectors are given in Table 8. Our econometric
estimates of FDI functions for Turkey suggest that GDP as a proxy of market size
related to location of FDI and most effective determinants in model one and two. This
means that foreign investors prefer big market size because of scale economies. There is
a positive relationship between openness and FDI but this is a small relationship in case
of Turkey. There is a negative relationship between FDI and CPI. For foreign investors,
home country’s economic stability is important. As CPI is the used proxy of economic
stability, results of models are as expected. Energy production is used as a proxy of
infrastructure and we found that EP affects FDI positively. Labour productivity is
related to FDI positively. High labour productivity means low labour cost. Low labour
cost attracts FDI for labour-intensive production sectors. Labour productivities and
rate of capable labours have positive impact on FDI.
Conclusion
During the past ten years we have seen a tremendous growth of foreign direct investment.
Further economic development of Turkey depends to a large extent on continuous
FDI and policy-making that will facilitate inward investment. The modelling strategy
adopted in this study involves two steps:
•

determining the order of integration of the variables by employing unit-root tests;

•

if the variables are integrated in the same order, we apply the Johansen –
Juselius(1990, 1992, 1994) maximum likelihood method of cointegration 3 to
obtain the number of cointegrating vector(s).

The long-run relationship between FDI, GDP, OPEN, CPI, EP and LABOR is tested

52

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis for Turkey

by conducting cointegration test over the period 1975 to 2012.In the first place, the
intention of the study is to examine the long-run linear relationship between FDI
and explanatory variables. The empirical results at the first phase proved that none
of the series is stationary and has to be differenced in order to convert the series into
stationary. All these series are statistically significant at first difference order and are
integrated in the same order. The next test of cointegration established that the FDI
inflows are said to have long run linear relationship with GDP, openness, consumer
price index, electricity production and labour productivity. Based on the cointegration
analysis, stability of these macroeconomic variables will expectedly attract more FDI
into Turkey for sustainable economic growth. The above-findings have important
policy implications. Firstly, since the market size of the host country has significant
effect on FDI, there is need for continuous increase and growth of the nation’s Gross
Domestic Product. Secondly, the major results show that there is a positive effect of
market size, openness, energy production and labour productivity on FDI. But CPI
as a proxy of market stability affects FDI negatively in the long run. At the same time,
we provide evidence that is complementary to Açıkalın, Gülve Yaşar (2006), as well as
Düzgün (2007) in one important respect.
These empirical findings have important key policy implications for Turkish economy.
FDI inflows of Turkey can be used to predict the decisions of foreign residents who
want to invest in this host economy in the long run with these empirical findings. The
scope of this study could be much broader in terms of analyzing the effect of differences
in FDI inflows, combined market size, openness, consumer price index, electricity
production and labour productivity. This would perhaps give a much broader and clear
picture of the determinants of FDI inflows to Turkey.
There are many other questions that we should take into consideration in further
development of this study. However, it is worth mentioning that the determinants
of the FDI and effects on growth in the cointegration framework seem to offer new
suggestions for future research.
References
Açıkalın, S., Gül, E., &amp; Yaşar, E. (2006).Ücretlerve Büyümeile Doğrudan Yabancı
Yatırımlar Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Analizi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Dergisi, 16, 271-282.
Agarwal, J. P. (1980). Determinants of foreign direct investment: A survey.
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 116(4), 739-773.
Asiedu, E. (2002). On the determinants of foreign direct investment to developing
countries: is Africa different? World Development, 30, 107-19.
Asiedu, E. (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa: the role of natural resources,
market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. World Economy,
29(1), 63-77.

Volume 5 Number 2 Fall 2015

53

�Huseyin Kalyoncu, Nadide Tuluce, Zeynep Ozturk Yaprak

Barrell, R., &amp; Pain, N. (1996). An econometric analysis of US foreign direct
investment. The review of economics and statistics, 78, 200-207.
Barros, P.P., &amp; Cabral, L.M.B. (2001). Government subsidies to foreign direct
investment, CEPR Working Paper, February.
Biswas, R. (2002). Determinants of foreign direct investment. Review of Development
Economics, 6(3), 492-504.
Botrić, V., &amp; Škuflić, L. (2006). Main determinants of foreign direct investment in the
southeast European countries, Transition Studies Review, 13(2), 359-377.
Brainard, S.L. (1993). An empirical assessment of the factor proportions explanation
of multinationals sales, NBER Working Paper No. 4580. Cambridge, MA: National
Bureau of Economic Research.
Brainard, S.L. (1997). An empirical assessment of the proximity–concentration tradeoff between multinational sales and trade. American Economic Review, 87(4), 520–544.
Chakrabarti, A. (2001). The determinants of foreign direct investment: sensitivity
analyses of cross-country regressions. Kyklos, 54(1), 89-114.
Cheng H., &amp; Gastañaga V. (2001). Factors affecting foreign direct investment — with
an analysis of the disparity between the coastal and western regions of China. Review
of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 4(4), 479-493.
Cheng, L. K., &amp; Kwan, Y. K. (1999). FDI stock and its determinants. In: Wu, Y. (Ed.),
Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in China, Chapter 3. Edward Elgar,
Cheltenham, 42-56.
Cleeve, E. (2008). How effective are fiscal incentives to attract FDI to Sub-Saharan
Africa? The Journal of Developing Areas,42(1), 135-153.
Coughlin, C. C., &amp; Segev, E. (2000). Foreign direct investment in China: a spatial
econometric study. World Economy, 21(1), 1-23.
Culem, C. G. (1988). The locational determinants of direct investments among
industrialized countries. European Economic Review, 32, 885-904.
Dees, S. (1998). Foreign direct investment in China: determinants and effects.
Economics of Planning, 31, 175-194.
Dickey, D. A., &amp; Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time
series with a unit root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49,10571072.

54

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis for Turkey

Dunning, J.H. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Harrow:
Addison-Wesley.
Düzgün, R. (2008). Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarıve Yurtiçi Yatırımlar
Arasındaki Eşbütünleşm İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 187-204
Edwards, S. (1990). Capital flows, foreign direct investment and dept. equity swaps
in developing countries, National Bureau of Economic Research (Cambridge, M.A.),
Working Paper No: 3497.
Ekholm, K. (1998). Proximity advantages scale economies, and the location of
production. In: The geography of multinational firms, Springer US, 59-76.
Flamm, K. (1984). The volatility of offshore investment. Journal of Development
Economics, 16(3), 231-248.
Gastanaga, V. M., Nugent, J.B., &amp; Pashamova B. (1998). Host country reforms and
FDI inflows: how much difference do they make? World Development, 26(7), 12991314.
Goldsbrough, D.G. (1979). The role of foreign direct investment in the external
adjustment process. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 26,725-754.
Groh, A. P., &amp; Wich, M. (2012). Emerging economies’ attraction of foreign direct
investment. Emerging Markets Review, 13(2), 210-229.
Huang, J. T., Kuo, C. C., &amp; Kao, A. P. (2003).The inequality of regional economic
development in China between 1991 and 2001. Journal of Chinese Economic and
Business Studies, 1(3), 273-285.
Johansen, S., &amp; Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on
cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics
and statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
Khachoo, A. Q., &amp; Khan, M. I. (2012). Determinants of FDI inflows to developing
countries: a panel data analysis. MPRA Paper No. 37278
Kravis, I. B., &amp; Lipsey, R. E. (1982).The location of overseas production and production
for export by US multinational firms. Journal of International Economics, 12(3), 201223.
Lim, M. E. G. (2001). Determinants of, and the Relation Between, Foreign Direct
Investment and Growth: A Summary of the Recent Literature (No. 1-175). International
Monetary Fund.

Volume 5 Number 2 Fall 2015

55

�Huseyin Kalyoncu, Nadide Tuluce, Zeynep Ozturk Yaprak

Lipsey, R. E. (2000). Interpreting developed countries’ foreign direct investment,
National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 7810, 1–24.
Liu, X., Song, H., Wei, Y., &amp; Romilly, P. (1997). Country characteristics and foreign
direct investment in China: A panel data analysis. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 133(2),
313-329.
Love, J. H., &amp; Lage-Hidalgo, F. (2000). Analysing the determinants of US direct
investment in Mexico. Applied Economics, 32(10), 1259-1267.
Lucas, R. E. (1993). On the determinants of direct foreign investment: evidence from
East and Southeast Asia. World Development, 21(3), 391-406.
Lunn, J. (1980). Determinants of US direct investment in the EEC: Further
evidence. European Economic Review, 13(1), 93-101.
Mainardi, S. (1992). Foreign direct investment in Latin America and South East Asia:
relevance of macroeconomic and policy-related factors. Giornale degli Economisti e
Annali di Economia, 51(5-8) 259-279.
Markusen, J. R., &amp; Maskus, K. E. (1999). Discriminating among alternative theories
of the multinational enterprise (No. w7164). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Meyer, K. E. (2003). FDI spillovers in emerging markets: A literature review and new
perspectives. Copenhagen Business School (Mimographed.).
Mhlanga, N., Blalock, G., &amp; Christy, R. (2010). Understanding foreign direct
investment in the southern African development community: an analysis based on
project‐level data. Agricultural Economics, 41(3‐4), 337-347.
TCMB (Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey), (2014).Outstanding External Debt
and Balance Of Payments Statistics. Electronic Data Delivery System, RetrievedMay 7,
2014, from: http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/TCMB+EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/
STATISTICS/Statistical+Data+%28EDDS%29

Todaro, M.P. (1994). Economic Development (5th Edition). New York and London:
Longman.

56

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3507">
                <text>2927</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3508">
                <text>Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis for Turkey</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3509">
                <text>KALYONCU, Hüseyin
TULUCE, Nadide
YAPRAK, Zeynep Ozturk</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3510">
                <text>Abstract: This paper aims to investigate empirically the determinants of FDI for Turkey over the annual period of 1975-2012. Our main interest is to study how different reflecting inflows of FDI in Turkey are. This study examines time series data evidence concerning empirical relevance between FDI attraction and its determinative effects. As a definition, FDI is a direct investment into production or business in a country by an individual or company of another country, either by buying a company in the target country or by expanding operations of an existing business in that country.   Unit root and Johansen cointegration tests are used in order to analyze the determinants of FDI for Turkey. Our econometric model expresses foreign direct investment (FDI), as a function of market size (GDP), openness (OPEN) calculated as Export + Import/ GDP, inflation rate (CPI), energy production (EP), labor productivity (LABOR). The major results show that there is a positive effect of GDP, OPEN, EP and LABOR on FDI.  But CPI’s effect on FDI is negative in the long run.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3511">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3512">
                <text>2015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3513">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>HB Economic Theory</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="127" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="131">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/49c1a0dbe8e68725026af0cea5d546a3.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7283c2aa89c62de29776de4f3d63c6ec</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980">
                <text>3754</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="981">
                <text>Determinants of the Financing Obstacles Faced by SMEs:  An Empirical Study of Emerging Economies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="982">
                <text>Nizaeva, Mirgul
Coskun, Ali</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="983">
                <text>Ab stract: Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) play a crucial role  in the economic development of emerging countries. The lack of access to  finances is one of the important growth constraints the SMEs face. This  study investigates the firm and country specific determinants of the financial  constraint levels of SMEs in selected emerging Western Balkan economies.  The main determinants of the financing obstacles examined in the sampled  countries were: firm size, ownership type, and age, accounting information  transparency, the depth of credit information indexes, the banking sector  concentration, property registration costs; and per capita GDP. The findings  confirm that firm size is a significant determinant of the financial constraint  levels of SMEs in the selected economies. Moreover, we found that older firms  are financially more constrained in the region. The possible economic  implications of the positive association between firm age and financial  constraint are discussed. Banking sector concentration level plays crucial role  in the external financing of SMEs in developing countries. By closely  examining the firm characteristics and country-level factors that determine the  degree of the financing obstacles faced by SMEs, we observed that in  developing economies overall institutional and financial problems are more  important than firm-specific</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="984">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="985">
                <text>2018</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="986">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="98">
            <name>DOI</name>
            <description>Digital object identifier</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="987">
                <text>doi: 10.14706/JECOSS17725     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="988">
                <text>ISSN 1986-8499, </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2262" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3316">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/faa640e764753698cc4d74d08038866d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>47c90557b50c306b35a474516070933b</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="18278">
                    <text>3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

Yavuz, G. and Serdaroğlu U. ( 2010) “Kalkınma ve Kadın (veya toplumsal cinsiyet)
İlişkilendirilişinin Değişimindeki Kavşaklar” in U. Serdaroğlu (ed.) İktisat ve Toplumsal
Cinsiyet, Efil Yayınevi, Ankara.
Yumuş, A. (2011) Kalkınma Planları Çerçevesinde Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği Anlayışının
Ekonomik, Toplumsal ve Siyasal Boyutları, T.C. Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü Genel
Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Ankara.

Determinants Of Turkey Current Account Deficit: An Econometric Analysis
M. Metin Dam, İsmet Göçer,Şahin Bulut,Mehmet Mercan
Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences Department of
Economy
Abstract
The main causes of the current account deficit in Turkey; the foreign trade deficit, the high
ratio of intermediate goods imports, high oil prices and Turkey's energy import dependence,
lack of domestic savings, foreign direct investment and low tourism revenues.
In this study, the causes of the current account deficit and current account deficit financing
structure were examined. In addition, the determinanats of Turkey current account deficit
wereanalyzed via VAR methods using the data of 2002-2011 monthly current account deficit,
net export, interest on external debt, transfer payments and costs of tourism.
As a result of the study, According to variance discrimination results obtained from VAR
model composed under this roof, current account deficit is determined by its own shocks in
the short term. In addition, current account deficit prediction error variance is determined by
tourism expenditures and foreign debt interest rate as well as its own variables. Current
account deficit is affected by export, foreign debt interest rate, transfer payments and shock
given to tourism expenditures.
Keywords: Current Account Deficit, Determinants, VAR, Turkey
1.INTRODUCTION
1.1.What is current account deficit?
Current account deficit is the difference between the amount of foreign currency getting in
and out a country. Export and tourism make up foreign currency income and import and
foreign expenditure make up foreign currency expenditure. Current account deficit is reached:
the foreign currency obtained from goods export, service export like tourism(e.g the wage
income of those working abroad) and manufacture factors are added and the expenditures
made in the same category (import, tourism expenditures, the transfer of the profit gained by
111

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

foreigners) are subtracted from total. İf the figures obtained show a value then it means that
you have a current account deficit.
The economic relations of a country with outsideworld is monitored in a balance-sheet called
payment balance. This balance-sheet shows us how much foreign currency surplus or deficit
occurred within the term mentioned demonstrating the foreign currency incomes and
expenditures in a balanced approach.
Payment balance is made up of two sections. Current deficit balance and capital account.
Only current deficit balance will be clarified here. Current account balance consists of 4 subbalances.
1.
2.
3.
4.

Goods balance
Services balance
Investment revenues balance
Current account transfers

Goods Balance: The difference between foreign currency incomes obtained from the sales
abroad and foreign currency costs for goods purchased from abroad by a country.
Services Balance: The difference between foreign currency incomes obtained from services
such as transport, insurance, tourism and foreign currency costs paid for similar services.
Investment Revenues Balance: The difference between the profits gained from the FDI,
interest revenues from portfolio investments by a particular country etc. and foreigners’
profits from similar investments in that country and foreign currency revenues in foreign
currencies.
Currentc Account Transfers: The foreign currency input from workers abroad. Therefore, we
can formulate current account balance as;
Current Account Balance = Goods Balance + Services Balance + Investment Revenue
Balance + Current Account Transfers. If the result of this total is minus(-), current account
deficit exists.
1.2. What Are The Effect of Current Account on Economy?
An economy whose current account is on the rise needs to grow its capital accounts as well.
The foreign dependence of an economy whose capital accounts grow increases. One of the
most debated issues in Turkish economy is current account deficit. Given that the final goal of
macroeconomic policies is to provide an interior and exterior balance in the economy of a
particular economy, an un acceptible and unsustainable current deficit will mean gradual
deviation from exterior balance, therefore, in this case, the problem needs solving through
economic policies.
While the provision and maintenance of interior balance means, in general, price stability and
exact employment, exterior balance means the payment balance between the total expenditure
and revenues of a particular country. Current account deficit can be explained as a deviation
related to exterior imbalances in this regard(Telatar, 2011).
1.3.What are the Objectives of this Study?
The aim of this study is to analyse the determinants of current account deficit through
2002:M1-2011:M12 data. This issue needs to be discussed and suggestions for solution need
112

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

to be developed because of the fact that current account deficit reached its peak 2011. The
study is important in this respect. The rest of the study consists of 6 main sections. In the
primary sections are completed that it is introduction, second section determinants of current
account deficit in Turkey, the third section up-to-date data regarding current account deficit
in Turkey, the fourth section literature, the fifth section analysis and final section.
2.Determinants of Current Account Deficit in Turkey
The determinants of current account deficits (CAD) are now at the centre of international
macroeconomics with the recent experience of large imbalances of a number of countries
including the USA. The empirical literature appears to focus on the determinants and
sustainability of CAD in individual countries or the consequences in a cross-section of
countries (Özmen, 2005).
The determinants of current account balances are of considerable interest in open economy
macroeconomics. Alternative theoretical models have different predictions about the factors
underlying current account dynamics and about the sign and magnitude of the relationships
between current account fluctuations and these determinants(Chinn and Prasad, 2000). Hence,
empirical analysis of the sort undertaken in this paper could help discriminate among
competing theories.
The current account deficit (CA), we define as follows14:
CAt = NXt + rtBt + TRt

(1)

In the equation (1) current account deficit; explained through trade in goods, interest
payments on foreign debt and transfer payments.
NX t

; net exports of goods and services, Bt ; bills, bonds, equities, loans and physical capital
that exceed the net foreign assets (foreign debt of countries, external debt stock), rt ;
international interest rate, rt Bt ; net return on net foreign assets (foreign debt of the countries,
the interest on foreign debt) and TRt ; represents transfer payments net of public and private
sector.
NXt = Xt – Mt, part of CAt has the biggest share is the last period in Turkey. When the
country is indebted to rt Bt and CAt is negative value adversely affected.Transfer payments are
usually made out of small countries, since there is little outsiders, TRt positive affected CAt.
According to this definition, the causes of the current account deficit, external debt and
interest payments on trade in goods.
3.Up-to-date data regarding current account deficit in Turkey
The republic of Turkey produced 57 billion dolar current account deficit from 1923 to 2002.
The current account deficit, which was 48,5 billion dolars in 2010, rose to 77,1 billion dollars
in late 2011.
Figure 1. Current Account Balance (January 2000 - August 2010. GDP ratio,%)
14In this section, Uygur(2004)were the work of the reference analysis.
113

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

Source: Central Bank President D. Yilmaz Submission of Plan and Budget Commission of the
Parliament (October 2010).
Mehmet Simsek, Turkish Finance Minister, points out that current account deficit is an issue
that has both structural and cyclical aspects. He also added that domestic demand in Turkey
has grown 8-10 times as fast as that of Europe, and surging oil prices and Arab spring in the
region caused the current account deficit to rise to an unpredictably high levels.
4.Literature
The studies in which current account deficit is analyzed through exterior balance approach
was launched by Husted (1992), and he was followed by Milesi-Ferretti and Razin (1996),
Fountas and Wu (1999) and Edwards (2001).
Khan and Knight (1983), using pooled cross-section time-series analysis for a sample of 32
non-oil developing countries during the period 1973-80. The empirical results suggest the
importance of exercising circumspection in attributing to any single cause the current account
imbalances experienced by non-oil developing countries during the 1970s.
When foreign Exchange rate falls down, export goods’ prices rise and export is badly
influenced. And imported goods’ prices relatively fall down and import increases. (Peker
Hotunluoğlu, 2009)
Edwards (2005) examined the relation between US dolar and US current account deficit. It
was pointed out in the analysis that foreign demand for dollars will lower current accoun
deficit and in the near future US foreign deficit will decrease the rate of growth at a
remarkable scale.
Aristovnik (2006) reached the conclusion in his research on transition economies that, in case
current account transactions deficit surpasses 5% of GDP, eonomies generally have trouble
with foreign sustainability.
Yamak and Korkmaz (2007), in his study in which he used a data set of 2001:04-2005:09
period and modern times series techniques, reached the conclusion that Turkish current
account deficit is sustainable in weak form and there is a co-integration relation between
export-import series.
Peker (2009) analyzed the sustainability of current account transaction deficit in Turkey
through co-integration method using 1992:01-2007:12 period monthly data. As a result of the
survey, he found out that current account deficit can be sustained at alow level, though a longterm relation between export and import series exists, co-integration co-efficient is 0,8926
114

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

consequently, he concluded that foreign currency revenues are lower than foreign currency
expenditures.
Oktar and Dalyancı (2011) found out that the sustainability of Turkish economical growth
depends on maintenance of current account deficit. He also examined the relation between
monetary policies and current account transactions for Turkish economy through time series,
and found out that there is no Granger causality between Central Bank of Turkish Republic
policy interest rate and current account transactions balance in the short term and an adverse
co-integration relation in the long-run.
Erdil Sahin (2011) emphasized that current account deficit because of high rate growth
depending on domestic demand and execessively valuable Turkish Lira should be recovered
through new structural reform policies based on firm growth Fundamentals. He concluded
that current account deficit financed by short-term capital entrances like in Turkey, however,
is unsustainable due to capital exit risk, whatever size it is.
Chen (2011) examined the sustainability of current account deficit on economy policy in G-7
countries through econometric methods and found out that while current account deficit is
sustainable for Germany and Japan in the long run, he couldn’t reach positive results for
Canada, France, Italy, UK and USA.
Kim, Min, Hwang and Mcdonald (2009) concluded in the studies they conducted on the 19812003 period quarter data of far-east countries such as Indonesia, Korea, Malasia, the
Phillippines and Thailand that those developing countries had a high growth rate and their
current account deficit was sustainable.
5.ANALYSIS
5.1.Data Set
2002:M1-2011:M12 covering the period of this study, five variables were used. What
variables stand for; (CAD), the level of current account deficit, (NX), net exports (FID),
interest on external debt, (TP) transfer payments and (TE) represents the costs of tourism.
Variables were obtained from Central Bank of Turkey Electronic Data Delivery System,
balance of payments detailed presentation part. As a result of the analysis, which variable or
variables were effective on the variables that detrmine the current account deficit was
analyzed. Estimates for all the test and computer package Eviews 5.1 program was used.
5.2.Method
Without any restrictions on the VAR models, structural models can be delivered between the
dynamic relationships and for this reason, often used in time series (Keating, 1990:453 - 454).
Since the VAR model which is most frequently used in Time series of economic studies does
not require inernal-external distinction, in any way out of economic theory, it differs from
simultaneous equation systems in this respect. Moreover, that lagged values of dependent
variables are also included in VAR models makes strong predictions for the future possible.
(Kumar, Leona, Gasking, 1995: 365).
As a result of estimating VAR model, instead of interpreting the parameters obtained,
comments can be made for the future by passing the analysis of residues obtained from the
estimated result of the system. The effects of shocks that these are likely to ocur in error terms
of the variables in the models are measured with Impulse-Response functionsas shown in
115

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

Enders(1995: 305-311), the Variance Decomposition which is determined with the model
prediction and measures the prediction error variance another technique is used in the
analysis of residuals. It is mention that with technical assistance mentioned, the effects of
statistical shocks on the variables will be observed.
5.3.Unit Root Test
Static variables are checked in the methods used in time series analysis. A time series is
stationary if its average and variance does not change over time and the covariance in a period
is dependent on only the distance between two periods not the period the covariance is
calculated (Gujarati, 1999: 713). Dickey and the problem of the estimated regression models
are faced with a fake because of the (Granger and Newbold, 1974), the obtained results do not
reflect the true relationship. In such a case, T and F statistics are lost. Therefore, meaningful
and non-stationary time series regression analysis reflect real relationships, but this is a cointegration relationship between the time series is made possible by the presence of (Gujarati,
1999: 725-726).
This level of stability study, the variables before Augmented Dickey-Fuller (1979) test was
analyzed to compare the results of this test is then Phillips-Perron (1988) test was used.
Variable
CAD
NX
FID
TE
TP

Table 1. ADF Unit Root Test
ADF Test
Level Value
1.Difference
2.Differece
-2.758[0]
-2.022[12]*
-9.457[11]**
-1.695[1]
-14.142[0]*
---1.414 [6]
-5.436 [5]*
---0.003[12]
-4.90711]*
---7.736[0]
-----

Critical Value (%1)
-3.493
-3.489
-3.489
-3.492
-3.486

Note: ADF with Schwarz criterion were tested. Level for all variables in the test format and the intercept was
used as the level value. The first difference variables (*) and the second difference (**) and the level values were
used. The values in square brackets, variables, states that the length of SIC determined by the appropriate delay.

NX CAD and the second by taking the difference of the variables, and TE FID has become
stationary by taking first difference. TP was the model-level value. The level of each variable
included in the model are stationary.
VAR will be estimated prior to model, appropriate for the model determined the length of the
delay. To do this, the following tests were used:
Table 2. Corelation LM Test

116

Lags

LM-Stat

Prob

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

35.40355
33.27135
30.48034
47.77828
31.62167
23.02558
30.94912
17.11513

0.0812
0.1244
0.2068
0.0640
0.1693
0.5761
0.1907
0.8776

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

9
10
11
12

22.40669
16.95346
27.58093
20.79169

0.6122
0.8835
0.3275
0.7042

Table 3. VAR Lag Selection Criteria Endogenous Variables
Lag

LogL

LR

FPE

AIC

SC

HQ

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

-8784.908
-8676.626
-8604.155
-8563.791
-8542.246
-8483.881
-8418.272
-8390.276
-8348.860
-8315.491

NA
204.6417
130.3155
68.87893
34.78816
88.88556
93.89887
37.49885
51.67573
38.57332*

7.62e+63
1.65e+63
6.94e+62
5.27e+62
5.70e+62
3.16e+62
1.55e+62
1.54e+62
1.22e+62
1.14e+62*

161.2827
159.7546
158.8836
158.6017
158.6651
158.0529
157.3077
157.2528
156.9516
156.7980*

161.4062
160.4954
160.2416*
160.5770
161.2576
161.2627
161.1349
161.6972
162.0133
162.4770

161.3328
160.0550
159.4343
159.4027
159.7164
159.3546
158.8598*
159.0552
159.0043
159.1010

* indicates lag order selected by the criterion
LR: sequential modified LR test statistic (each test at 5% level)
FPE: Final prediction error
AIC: Akaike information criterion
SC: Schwarz information criterion
HQ: Hannan-Quinn information criterion

Table 3 is examined, LR, FPE and AIC values are in the same direction, and 9 is the
minimum value for the delay. Both aim to determine the level of consistent delay, and, due to
lack of a very long time period covered nine-term delay, the delay level is determined as
appropriate for the model.
5.4.Variances Decomposition
To investigate the presence of structural breaks related to the variables, using the squares of
residuals, and thus return the system investigating the CUSUM structural break related to the
variables (Brown, Durbin and Evans, 1975:149-155) chart was used.
Figure 2. CUSUM of variables
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30

117

-40
03

04

05

06

CUSUM

07

08

09

10

5% Significance

11

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

Equalities, we can say that the structural break related to other variables. Due to a fracture
model variables were observed in the break out will be estimated using an artificial variable to
express any.
Table 4. Variance Decomposition Results

Period

S.E.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

84300967
1.49E+08
1.61E+08
1.63E+08
1.71E+08
1.71E+08
1.78E+08
1.94E+08
2.02E+08
2.04E+08

Period

S.E.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

726.8696
822.0173
835.0815
875.3560
889.0531
904.9741
971.0690
1001.682
1016.415
1029.796

Period

S.E.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

6409819.
8578346.
8867969.
8929659.
9101219.
9537165.
10506134
11332499
11463066
11850968

Period

118

S.E.

Variance Decomposition of DDCAD:
DDCAD
DNX
DFID
100.0000
95.09178
90.33680
87.25829
81.11985
80.28052
77.81817
72.94288
69.33291
68.12074

0.000000
2.023950
2.747490
5.747876
7.289460
7.239189
6.709760
6.458122
6.572370
6.577430

0.000000
1.984184
4.052956
4.171563
3.938387
3.901067
5.361156
6.146644
7.840872
8.276226

Variance Decomposition of DNX:
DDCAD
DNX
DFID
62.11543
60.45094
59.89074
61.66188
59.94052
58.08003
53.04461
52.55017
51.33369
50.83004

37.88457
31.35544
31.07529
28.68063
28.02536
28.67585
33.22206
31.41238
30.52297
29.86570

0.000000
0.956160
0.938940
1.468556
1.528729
3.093604
2.904349
3.676091
4.409506
4.308151

Variance Decomposition of DFID:
DDCAD
DNX
DFID
0.960621
1.703198
1.816690
1.843917
1.913250
5.070666
4.620808
4.982647
5.196262
5.048882

3.561922
7.614193
9.815775
10.02791
10.74781
10.02298
8.634321
7.593771
9.053756
11.80834

95.47746
87.11718
82.08521
80.96368
78.29582
72.88628
76.81778
76.05110
74.52841
71.04702

Variance Decomposition of DTE:
DDCAD
DNX
DFID

DTE

TP

0.000000
0.591259
2.412449
2.333944
7.201878
8.099975
7.610183
10.21749
12.30576
12.54971

0.000000
0.308826
0.450309
0.488322
0.450421
0.479254
2.500734
4.234860
3.948098
4.475894

DTE

TP

0.000000
7.233698
7.125766
7.026169
9.333278
9.012475
8.086086
9.583833
9.308097
9.425688

0.000000
0.003761
0.969261
1.162764
1.172110
1.138039
2.742890
2.777520
4.425732
5.570417

DTE

TP

0.000000
0.278227
2.768816
2.734430
4.769543
7.228628
5.978435
7.402783
7.297956
7.549994

0.000000
3.287206
3.513511
4.430063
4.273574
4.791440
3.948656
3.969697
3.923618
4.545765

DTE

TP

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

3664782.
4203964.
4559527.
4967974.
5040278.
5131554.
5398903.
5870845.
6065571.
6194207.

4.144082
9.252956
8.289357
7.025928
7.202990
8.425076
11.91116
11.86556
12.60093
14.69380

0.903425
0.705626
6.540827
9.021794
9.302489
9.819431
12.21158
17.82288
21.15931
20.81232

0.009031
3.328949
3.097522
5.351039
5.226973
6.159875
6.516126
10.86181
10.38818
10.05785

94.94346
86.21273
78.29637
69.75619
68.86394
66.43832
60.95210
52.02978
48.82419
47.10559

0.000000
0.499736
3.775922
8.845054
9.403608
9.157296
8.409036
7.419963
7.027386
7.330433

Variance Decomposition of TP:
Period

S.E.

DDCAD

DNX

DFID

DTE

TP

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

5585095.
5933919.
6556542.
6756191.
7099558.
7377532.
7431274.
7561157.
7734123.
8063976.

10.32720
10.60821
9.127853
10.77251
13.86680
13.17017
14.08089
14.27852
13.79738
20.45568

0.065194
0.778084
1.108046
1.114342
1.179061
2.558330
2.533998
3.692998
3.539359
3.295772

1.202163
1.230677
6.006631
5.727087
7.423425
6.979129
6.881688
6.671441
10.22790
9.469962

0.198028
1.858145
8.924092
11.34185
10.38171
13.20643
13.29330
13.02000
12.45194
11.50355

88.20741
85.52488
74.83338
71.04422
67.14900
64.08594
63.21013
62.33704
59.98342
55.27503

Cholesky Ordering: DDCAD DNX DFID DTE TP

Accordingly, the current account deficit is largely determined by its own shocks. Net exports
are determined by its own shocks in the short term, and by tourism expenditure and external
debt with interest in the long term. It looks that net exports are determined by current account
deficit and tourism expenditures as well as its own shocks in the long run. Foreign debt
interest rate results from supply shocks and net exports in the long term. Tourism
expenditures are affected by net exports and current account deficit in the long term. Supply
shocks of transfer payments result from itself in the short term and from tourism expenditures
and foreign debt interest rate in the long term.
That is, a negative increase in exports affects macroeconomic variables by triggering current
account deficit. It is a challenge to take current account deficit that follows an unstable trend
to a stable line. In other words, unless a regulation is made in order to break the trend of
unrest result in the coninuation of current account deficit. This situation is among basic
findings of the survey. One of the most significant consequences of variance decomposition is
that current account deficit is determined again by itself. The results obtained are supported
by the outcomes of impulse-response analysis.

119

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

5.5.Impulse Response Function
Analysis of basic situation arising as a result, net exports as the determinants of current
account deficit, external debt interest, transfer payments and indirect effects of tourism
expenditures affect the current account deficit.
Response to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations
Response of DDCAD to DDCAD

Response of DDCAD to DNX

Response of DDCAD to DFID

Response of DDCAD to DT E

Response of DDCAD to T P

1.20E+08

1.20E+08

1.20E+08

1.20E+08

1.20E+08

8.00E+07

8.00E+07

8.00E+07

8.00E+07

8.00E+07

4.00E+07

4.00E+07

4.00E+07

4.00E+07

4.00E+07

0.00E+00

0.00E+00

0.00E+00

0.00E+00

0.00E+00

-4.00E+07

-4.00E+07

-4.00E+07

-4.00E+07

-4.00E+07

-8.00E+07

-8.00E+07

-1.20E+08

-8.00E+07

-1.20E+08
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-8.00E+07

-1.20E+08
1

2

Response of DNX to DDCAD

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-8.00E+07

-1.20E+08
1

2

Response of DNX to DNX

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-1.20E+08
1

2

Response of DNX to DFID

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

Response of DNX to DT E

600

600

600

600

500

500

500

500

500

400

400

400

400

400

300

300

300

300

300

200

200

200

200

200

100

100

100

100

0

0

0

0

0

-100

-100

-100

-100

-100

-200

-200

-200

-200

-200

-300
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-300
1

2

Response of DFID to DDCAD

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2

Response of DFID to DNX

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2

Response of DFID to DFID

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

8000000

8000000

8000000

6000000

6000000

6000000

6000000

4000000

4000000

4000000

4000000

4000000

2000000

2000000

2000000

2000000

2000000

0

0

0

0

0

-2000000

-2000000

-2000000

-2000000

-2000000

-4000000

-4000000

-6000000
2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-4000000

-6000000
1

2

Response of DT E to DDCAD

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2

Response of DT E to DNX

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2

Response of DT E to DFID

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

4000000

4000000

4000000

3000000

3000000

3000000

3000000

2000000

2000000

2000000

2000000

2000000

1000000

1000000

1000000

1000000

1000000

0

0

0

0

0

-1000000

-1000000

-1000000

-1000000

-1000000

-2000000
3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-2000000
1

2

Response of T P to DDCAD

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-2000000
1

2

Response of T P to DNX

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2

Response of T P to DFID

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

6000000

6000000

6000000

6000000

5000000

5000000

5000000

5000000

4000000

4000000

4000000

4000000

3000000

3000000

3000000

3000000

3000000

2000000

2000000

2000000

2000000

2000000

1000000

1000000

1000000

1000000

0

0

0

0

0

-1000000

-1000000

-1000000

-1000000

-1000000

-2000000

-2000000

-2000000

-2000000

-2000000

-3000000
3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-3000000
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

9

10

1000000

-3000000
1

3

Response of T P to T P

4000000

2

2

Response of T P to DT E

5000000

1

10

-2000000
1

6000000

-3000000

9

Response of DT E to T P

4000000

2

2

Response of DT E to DT E

3000000

1

8

-6000000
1

4000000

-2000000

7

-4000000

-6000000
1

6

Response of DFID to T P

8000000

1

2

Response of DFID to DT E

6000000

-6000000

5

-300
1

8000000

-4000000

4

100

-300
1

3

Response of DNX to T P

600

-300

2

-3000000
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 3. Impuse-Response
6.Conclusion
In this survey, which was conducted on the determinants of current account deficit, current
account deficit, export, foreign debt interest rate, transfer payments and tourism expenditure
were studied. The variables mentioned were subjected to VAR analysis for 2002:M12011:M12 period as a result of stationarity research as long as they are stationary.
First, of the variables CAD and NX, the second difference taken, FID and TE the first
difference taken, were made stationary. TP was involved in the model with its surface value.
Each variable was involved in the model so long as they are stationary. The model’s time-lag
length was determined as 9.
According to variance discrimination results obtained from VAR model composed under this
roof, current account deficit is determined by its own shocks in the short term. In addition,
current account deficit prediction error variance is determined by tourism expenditures and
foreign debt interest rate as well as its own variables. Current account deficit is affected by
export, foreign debt interest rate, transfer payments and shock given to tourism expenditures.
120

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

It was observed that current account deficit is a potential problem in Turkey. It is thought that
it can stimulate crisis unless kept under control. However, the precautions taken by the
Central Bank of Turkish Republic recently are of great importance in terms of hindering
current account deficit. Therefore, not only total demand will be intimidated but also national
amount of savings will be raised. In this respect, increasing tourism revenues, keeping short
term capital movements under control measures to decrease imports and increase exports
could be taken into account.
REFERENCE
ARISTOVNIK, A. (2006), “Current Account Deficit Sustainability in Selected Transition
Economies”. Zb. Rad. Ekon. Fak. Rij. Vol.24 sv.1.81-102
BROWN, R.L., DURBİN, J. and EVANS, J.M. (19759: “Techniques for Testing the
Constancy of Regression Relationhips Over Time”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,
B, 37, Issue 2.
CHEN, S.W. (2011), “Are Current Account Deficits Really Sustainable in the G-7
Countries?” Japan and the World Economy 23, 190-201.
CHINN, M. and PRASAD, E.S. (2000), “Medium-Term Determinants of Current Account in
Industrial and Developing Countries: An Emrical Exploration”, NBER Working Paper, 7581.
EDWARDS, S. (2001), “Does the Current Account Matter?”, NBER, WP, No:8275:1-71.
EDWARTS, S. (2005), “Is the U.S. Current Account Deficit Sustainable? And if not, How
Costly is Adjustment Likely to be?” Naber Working Paper Series 11541
ENDERS, W. (1995), Applied Econometric Time Series: Wiley Series in Probability and
Mathemathical Statistics, New York, John Wiley Inc.
ERDİL ŞAHİN, B. (2011), “Türkiye’nin Cari Açık Sorunu”. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi,
cilt.3, no.2, ISSN:1309-8020
FOUNTAS, S. and WU, J.L. (1999), “Are the U.S. Current Account Deficits Really
Sustainable?”, International Economic Journal, 13(3).
GRANGER, C.W.J., NEWBOLD, P. (1974). “Spurious regressions in econometrics”. Journal
of Econometrics, 2 (2), pp. 111-120.
GUJARATI, D. N. (1999). Basic Econometrics, McGraw Hill, Literatür Yayıncılık, 3 rd
edition, İstanbul.
HUSTED S. (1992), “The Emerging U.S. Current Account Deficit in the 1980s: A
Cointegration Analysis,” The Review Of Economics &amp; Statics, February, pp: 159-166.
KEATING, J.W. (1990), “Identifying VAR Models Under Rational Expectations”, Journal of
Monetary Economics, 25.
KIM, B.H.,MIN, H.G.,HWANG, Y.S. and MCDONALD, J.A. (2009), “Are Asian countries’
current accounts sustainable? Deﬁcits, Even When Associated With High Investment, Are
Not Costless”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 31: 163–179.

121

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

KHAN, M.S. and KNIGHT, M.D. (1983), “Determinants of Current Account Balances of
Non-Oil Developing Countries in the 1970s An Empirical Analysis”. International Monetary
Fund, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 819-842.
KUMAR, V., LEONA, R.P. and GASKING, J.N. (1995), “Aggregate and Disaggregate
Sector Forecasting Using Consumer Confidence Measures”, International Journal of
Forecasting.
MILESI-FERRETTI, G. M. and RAZIN, A. (1996), “Sustainability of Persistent Current
Account Deficits”, NBER, WP, 5467.
PEKER, O. (2009), “Türkiye’de Cari Açık Sürdürülebilir mi? Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”.
Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 17, 1, 164-174
PEKER, O. and HOTUNLUOĞLU, H (22009), “Türkiye´de Cari Açığın Nedenlerinin
Ekonometrik Analizi”. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 3,
221-237
PHILLIPS, P.C.B. and PERRON, P. (1988) "Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series
Regression", Biometrika, 75,335–346.
OKTAR, S. and DALYANCI, L. (2011), “Türkiye Ekonomisinde Para Politikasının Cari
İşlemler Dengesi Üzerindeki Etkisinin Ekonometrik Analizi”. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F.
Dergisi cilt.3, sayı.1 ss.1-22
ÖZMEN, E. (2005), “Macroeconomic and institutional determinants of current account
deficits”, Applied Economics Letters, 12, 557-560.
TELATAR, E. (2011), “Türkiye’de Cari Açık Belirleyicileri ve Cari Açık-Krediler İlişkisi”,
Bankacılar Dergisi, Sayı 78.
UYGUR, E. (2004), “Cari Açık Tartışmaları”, İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 19(222): 5-20.
YAMAK, R. and KORKMAZ, A. (2007), “Türk Cari İşlemler Açığı Sürdürülebilir mi?
Ekonometrik Bir Yaklaşım”, Bankacılar Dergisi, 60.

Earning Isparta Carpet Business To The Local Economy Again And Ensuring Its
Sustainibility By Revising It
Nesrin Şalvarci Türeli, Erhan Türeli
Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
E-mails: nesrintureli@sdu.edu.tr, erhantureli@sdu.edu.tr
Abstract
Hand-woven carpet, one of the symbols of Isparta has lost its popularity in the sense of
business, employment, socio-cultural and economic aspects. In 1960s the carpet industry
which provided a great amount of income especially in local areas, and then in the overall city
122

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18272">
                <text>1318</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18273">
                <text>Determinants Of Turkey Current Account Deficit: An Econometric Analysis</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18274">
                <text>M. Metin Dam, Metin Dam</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18275">
                <text>The main causes of the current account deficit in Turkey; the foreign trade deficit, the high  ratio of intermediate goods imports, high oil prices and Turkey's energy import dependence,  lack of domestic savings, foreign direct investment and low tourism revenues.  In this study, the causes of the current account deficit and current account deficit financing  structure were examined. In addition, the determinanats of Turkey current account deficit  wereanalyzed via VAR methods using the data of 2002-2011 monthly current account deficit,  net export, interest on external debt, transfer payments and costs of tourism.  As a result of the study, According to variance discrimination results obtained from VAR  model composed under this roof, current account deficit is determined by its own shocks in  the short term. In addition, current account deficit prediction error variance is determined by  tourism expenditures and foreign debt interest rate as well as its own variables. Current  account deficit is affected by export, foreign debt interest rate, transfer payments and shock  given to tourism expenditures.  Keywords: Current Account Deficit, Determinants, VAR, Turkey</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18276">
                <text>2012-05-31</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18277">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="81">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General),HB Economic Theory,HG Finance,HJ Public Finance</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2950" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3718">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/03884403535bf7041eb4007bc0e5584b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cfa28b515d85e7a7db99ec8c456316c2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="22840">
                    <text>Determination of Biological Effect of Entomopathogen Fungus on
Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
Ş. Evrim Arıcı
University of Suleyman Demirel,
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection Isparta/TURKEY
evrima@ziraat.sdu.edu.tr
Mehmet Sedat Sevinç
University of Suleyman Demirel,
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection Isparta/TURKEY
medantinc@mynet.com.tr
Đsmail Karaca
University of Suleyman Demirel,
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection Isparta/TURKEY
ikaraca@sdu.edu.tr
Ozan Demirözer
University of Suleyman Demirel,
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection Isparta/TURKEY
ozand@ziraat.sdu.edu.tr

Abstract: In this study, Entomopathogenic fungi Perlomyces chlamidosporia,
Fusarium subglutinans, Fusarium solani, Baveria bassiana were investigated to the
effect of larvae great wax moth Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). P.
chlamidosporia, F. solani, two isolates of F subglutinans (8, 12), and B. bassiana were
cultured for 10 days potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium and incubated in dark
conditions at 25 ± 1 ºC. 1x107 spor / ml suspension for each isolates was used for each
isolates and Tween 20 was added in. By dipping method suspensions of spore were
experimented on Larvae of G. mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Larvae of G.
mellonella were cultured in 12-cm plastic petrie dishes at 25 ± 1 0C. 1, 24, 48 hours and
8, 13 days after the applications were eveluated the death larvae of G. mellonella. The
mortality rate of G. mellonella was observed between 50-70% but statistical difference
between isolates was not determined. The results obtained in the application used the
types of Entomopathogenic fungus can be used biological control for G. mellonella.

Introduction
Great wax moth (Galeria mellonella) is economical pest of honey bees (A. mellifera) and they are
widespread in particularly low altitude and temperate reason region which beekeeping land (Allan, 2000),
and they known that an important pest which beekeepers fall into trouble to protect their honeycombs all
over the world (Sanford, 2003). Great Wax Moth’s mature individuals, pupae, and egg stages don’t damage
to effervesced honeycombs but their larvaes do different levels of damage to honeycombs in the
appropriate environtenmal conditions (temperature, humidity, food). Great wax moth develops at above
4 °C' temperature and %70 humidity, commonly eliminates possibility of re-use of honeycomb by opening
the tunnels in stored effervesced honeycombs. (HaeWoon et al. 1995, Ritter et al., 1992). Such as chemical
(aluminum phosphide, methyl bromide, ethylene dibromide, paradichlorobenzene (naphthalene), sulfur),
physical applications (cold-hot) and biological insecticides (Bacillus thuringiensis) control methods used
in different ways to protect effervesced honeycombs from great wax moth in some countries (Tutkun et al.
1987; Ritter et al. 1992; Ahmad, 1994; Yacobson et al. 1997; Delaware, 2000; Kumova &amp;Korkmaz 2002).
19

�Many chemical substances which using to Great wax moth reduce the chance of marketing or
eliminate it because of residue on honey or wax. Today from this perspective, residue and ease of
application of insecticide to pest has taken into consideration and lead to new ways is inevitable (Allan,
2000). Biological control is one of the most suitable alternative method for chemical control in different
ecosystems and an environmentally friendly alternative that involve the use of natural enemies and
pathogens to control pests. A number of entomopathogenic fungi have been identified biological control
agents to control insects. These fungal agents are virulent, infect insect by contact persist in the
environment for a long time and have one of the largest host list. Recently it was studied on safety of
entomopathogenic fungi (Goettel &amp; Jaronski 1997; Goettel &amp; Hajek 2000; Goettel et al. 2001; AliShtayeh1 et al. 2002, Shah &amp; Pill 2003, Copping, 2004, Tuininga et al 2009¸ Zeinat et al. 2009).
The aim of the present study was to determine of possible effects of entomopathogenic Fusarium
subglutinans, Fusarium solani, Beauveria bassiana and Pochonia clamydosporia on the Galeria
mellonella’s larvae

Materials and Methods
Galeria mellonella and entomopathogenic fungi two isolates of Fusarium subglutinans (8, 12),
Fusarium solani, Beauveria bassiana and Pochonia clamydosporia were used in this study.
Galeria mellonella were taken to climate room in 25±1 ºC temperature and % 65±5 humidity for
reproduction of their number. Food from mix of honey, glycerin, dry wax and wheat bran were taken into
the jar which closed with tulle for air circulation and G. mellonella’s larvaes were taken into this jars to be
mature individuals. The adults from pupaes were taken into the jars which prepared by same way to laying
egg. The larvaes from egg were removed from food environment before the pupal period for application.
The fungi were cultured on PDA medium and incubated at 25ºC under dark conditions for 10 days.
Suspensions of spore from each isolate were prepared and spore concentrations (1X107) were prepared in
distilled sterillized water with the help of haemocytometer. By dipping method suspensions of spore were
experimented on last instar stage larvae and newly hatched G. mellonella’s larvaes (3-5 sn), after Tween
20 was added in suspensions. For the control experiment, sterillized water was applied to the test insects.
The G. mellonella’s larvaes were put in plastic petri dishes (12 cm) under controlled conditions (25ºC) and
the plastic petri dishes were supplied with honey for nutrition purposes.
Petri dishes containing G. mellonella’s larvaes were sealed with Parafilm to reduce moisture loss.
Samples were then incubated at 25 0C and a photoperiod of 16 hours light for 13 days. For each petri dish
had five larvae of G. mellonella five replicants and experiment for each entomopathogenic fungi consisted
of five replicate according to completely randomized design. For each experiment daily mortality had been
recorded for 13 days. Obtained data from bioassays were analyzed by SPSS version 16.0.1. Data were
analyzed by ANOVA and treatment means separated by TUKEY test (P &lt;0:05) to select isolates for a new
assay with several cultivars

Results and Discussion
In this study G. mellonella larvae found to be infected by entomopathogenic fungi and was
observed mortality of G. mellonella’s larvae (Table 1). Although a statistical difference was found between
the isolates and the control group, no statistical difference was determined between the isolates.
Entomophage
pathogen
Pochonia
clamydosporia
Fusarium solani
Fusarium
subglutinans (12)
Fusarium

Mortality of G. mellonella
24 h
0,2±0,2

48 h
0,6±0,4

8d
1±0,3

13 d
1,4±0,5

0,6±0,4
0,2±0,2

0,6±0,4
0,2±0,2

1,2±0,7
1±0,3

3±0,8
2,8±07

0,6±0,2

1±0,4

1,6±0,7

2,8±0,5

20

�subglutinans (8)
Beauveria
bassiana

0,4±0,2

0,6±0,6

1,6±0,5

2,8 ±0,6

Table 1: Mortality of G. mellonella larvae
It was observed 4% mortality of the larvae of G. mellonella infected with F. subglutinans 12 , 20%
with F. subglutinans 8, while was determinated 12% mortality of larvae of G. mellonella infected with
Fusarium solani, B.bassiana, and P. clamidosporium in 48 h (Table 2). It was recorded in 13 d 28%
mortality of larvae of G. mellonella infected with P. clamidosporium, 60% with F.solani, while was
observed 56% mortality of G. mellonella larvae with F. subglutinans 12, F. subglutinans 8 and with
B.bassiana.
Some researcher indicated similarly results (James &amp; Elzen 2001; Shah &amp; Pill 2003; Mohammed
et al. 2009). In addition same researcher used larvae of G. mellonella to determine the relative abundance
of entomopathogenic nematodes, and fungi (Chadler et al. 1997; Ali-Shtayeh et al. 2001; Tuininga et al.
2009).
Entomophage pathogene

Mortality %
48h

13 d

12
12
4
20

28
60
56
56

12

56

Pochonia clamydosporia
Fusarium solani
Fusarium subglutinans (12)
Fusarium subglutinans (8)
Beauveria bassiana

Table 2: Mortality percentage of G. mellonella ‘s larvae
In conclusion; fungal mycel of entomopathogens used in this study had grown on death larvae of
G. mellonella. Entomopathogenic fungi can used for biological control and in pest management.

References
Ahmad, M. (1994). Biological Control of Greater Wax Moth, Galleria mellonella L. Journal of Apicultural Research
(Pakistan). Vol. 32(3), 319-323.
Allan, L. (2000). Wax Moth and its Control. Departmen of Agriculture Western Australia.
http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/agency/pubns/farmnote/2000/f00697.htm.
Chandler, D., Hay, D., &amp;Reid, A.P. (1997). Sampling and occurrence of entomopathogenic fungi and nematodes in UK
soils Applied Soil Ecology 5 133-141
Copping, L.G. (2004). The Manual of Biocontrol Agents.British Crop Protection Council, Alton, 702 pp
Delaware, M. (2000). New Jersey, Pensylvania, Westiginia and the USDA Cooperating. MAAREC Publication, 4.5.
Goettel, M.S., &amp; Jaronsky, S.T. (1997). Safety and registration of microbial agents for control of grasshoppers and
locust. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can., 171: 83-99.
Goettel, M.S., &amp; Hajek A.E. (2000). Evaluation of non-target effects of pathogens used for management of arthropods.
In: Wajnberg E,Scott JK, Quimby PC (eds) Evaluating indirect ecological effects of biological control. CABI
Publishing, Wallingford, pp 81–97
Goettel, M.S., Hajek, A.E., Siegel, J.P., &amp; Evans, H.C. (2001). Safety of fungal biocontrol agents.

21

�HaeWoon, O., ManYoung, L., Young Duck, &amp; Chang (1995). Developing Periods and Damage Patterns of Combs by
The Greater Wax Moth, Galleria mellonella. Korean Journal of Apiculture 10: 1, 5-10.
James, R.R., &amp; Elzen, G.W. (2001). Antagonism between Beauveria bassiana and imidacloprid when combined for
Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) control. J. Econ. Entomol., 94: 357–61
Kumova, U., &amp; Korkmaz, A. (2002). Peteklerin Büyük Bal Mumu Güvesi (Galleria mellonella L.) ‘ ne Karşı
Korunması Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Türkiye 3. Arıcılık Kongresi, Adana.
Mohammed S. Ali-Shtayeh1, Abdel-Basit B.M, &amp; Mara’i Rana M. J. (2002). Distribution, occurrence and
characterization of entomopathogenic fungi in agricultural soil in the Palestinian area Mycopathologia 156: 235–244,
2002.
Ritter, W., Perschill, F., Vogel R. 1992. Comparision of the effect of various methods fort he control of wax moths.
Allgemeine Deutsche Imkerzeitung. 26: 1, 11-13. CAB Abstracts 1993-1994, AN:930234018
Sanfort, M.T. (2003). Controlling Wax moth, one of a series of the Entomology and nematology Department, Florida
Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. EDIS Web Site at
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu
Shah, P. A., &amp; Pell, J. K. (2003). Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol,
61:413–423
Tuınınga, A. R., Mıller J. L., Morath S. U., Danıels T. J., Falco R. C., Marchese M., Sahabı, S., Rosa, D., &amp; Stafford K.
C. (2009). Isolation of Entomopathogenic Fungi From Soils and Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) Ticks: Prevalence
and Methods. J. Med. Entomol. 46(3): 557-565
Tutkun E., Çakmakçı, L., &amp; Boşgelmez A. (1987). Bal Arısı Kolonilerinde Bacillus thrugiensis Preparatlarının Büyük
Mum Güvesi (G. mellonella) Larvalarına Karşı Kullanım Olanakları Üzerinde Araştırmalar. TÜBĐTAK, Tarım ve
Ormancılık Araştırma Grubu, Tarımsal Mikrobiyoloji Ünitesi Proje no: Tarmik-8-34 s.
Yacobson, B., Navarro, S., Donahaye, E. J., Azrielli, A., Sloyevsky, Y., &amp; Ephrati, H. (1997). Control of Beeswax
moths using carbondioxide in flexible plastic and metal structure. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Controlled atmosphere and
fumigation in grain storages 21-26 April 1996, Nicosia Cyprus pp: 169-174.
Zeinat K.M., S.A. El-Sayed, Radwan T.E.E., &amp; Ghada, S. Abd El-Wahab (2009). Potency Evaluation of Serratia
marcescens and Pseudomonas fluorescens as Biocontrol Agents for Root-knot Nematodes in Egypt. Journal of
Applied Sciences Research, 4(1): 93-102

22

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22834">
                <text>324</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22835">
                <text>Determination of Biological Effect of Entomopathogen Fungus on  Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22836">
                <text>Arıcı, S. Evrim
Sevinç, Mehmet Sedat
Karaca, İsmail
Demirözer, Ozan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22837">
                <text>In this study, Entomopathogenic fungi Perlomyces chlamidosporia,  Fusarium subglutinans, Fusarium solani, Baveria bassiana were investigated to the  effect of larvae great wax moth Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). P.  chlamidosporia, F. solani, two isolates of F subglutinans (8, 12), and B. bassiana were  cultured for 10 days potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium and incubated in dark  conditions at 25 ± 1 ºC. 1x107 spor / ml suspension for each isolates was used for each  isolates and Tween 20 was added in. By dipping method suspensions of spore were  experimented on Larvae of G. mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Larvae of G.  mellonella were cultured in 12-cm plastic petrie dishes at 25 ± 1 0C. 1, 24, 48 hours and  8, 13 days after the applications were eveluated the death larvae of G. mellonella. The  mortality rate of G. mellonella was observed between 50-70% but statistical difference  between isolates was not determined. The results obtained in the application used the  types of Entomopathogenic fungus can be used biological control for G. mellonella.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22838">
                <text>2010-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22839">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="15">
        <name>Q Science (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1692" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2367">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/7aed1fe192b2e1bbd39dac1a7534c587.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0c0a8cd59f24cfe1e1c0fa8a7eaf37ff</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="13855">
                    <text>International Conference on Economic and Social Studies, 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Determination of Cultural Characteristics of Hunters in
İstanbul Province to Hunting and Wildlife Management
(İstanbul Province Case)
İsmail Şafak
Aegean Forestry Research Institute, İstanbul, Turkey
isafak35@hotmail.com
Taner Okan
University of İstanbul, Faculty of Forest, İstanbul, Turkey
tokan@İstanbul.edu.tr
Erdem Hizal
University of İstanbul, Faculty of Forest, İstanbul, Turkey
hizal@İstanbul.edu.tr
Tamer Keçecioğlu
Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
tamer.kececioglu@ege.edu.tr
Caner Işık
Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
kim.caner@gmail.com
Sedat Acar
Mustafa Kemal Paşa National Park, Turkey
sedatacar3495@hotmail.com
Turkey has a rather important potential from the point of view of wildlife
resources which includes both species diversity and sheltering capacity. On the
other hand, wildlife in Turkey has been endangered since wilderness
ecosystem and habitats have been damaged and managed badly. There is a
rather important role of hunters in this process.
Hunting, which means catching of either living or lifeless animals that live
freely in the nature, has attracted attention of mankind almost in every term.
Hunting has been accepted as an important activity also today as well as in the
past. It is not a realistic approach considering the hunting passion which comes
to today with the traces from the past as nothing. Today, hunters have become
a guaranty of biodiversity and wilderness by getting an environmentalist
status.
As increasing economic and social welfare, first of all demands of hunters and
demands of stakeholders from wildlife sector are getting increased by varying.
In this context, it is obligatory to develop and reach a rationalist management
of wildlife potential that promises a great future of Turkey.

176

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies, 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

In Turkey, lawful regulations were made in 2003 with act of 4915 to solve
problems of wildlife management. Wildlife management in Turkey still live a
transition period, problems are going on because new laws and its
implementations have not yet established. Among these problems, illegal
hunting, uneducated hunters, lack of hunter controlling have important place;
basic problems are social, cultural, economic and lack of scientific structure.
Associations, institutions and enterprises attach importance for knowing
cultural elements and factors that affect them. It has been use an active
instrument to convey cultural data and to reach aims. In this context,
researches that determine human structure and cultural sensitiveness fields in
the management of wildlife resources are very important.
There have been seen some researches which related to determine of hunter
profile since 2002. But, there are too few studies to determine cultural
characteristics of hunters. In this context, it is needed some studies for hunter
culture as related to management activities.
This research project includes hunting clubs and their members in İstanbul. For
this aim, according to sample size, there will be reached primary data using
questionnaire method which is prepared for hunters. Some data based on
literature research constitute secondary data of research.
In this research, questionnaire, called the hunter form, will be developed.
Hunter Form; cultural elements of hunters, profile of hunters and level of
importance on the issue of hunters were determined. Nine-point Likert Scale
was used in some questions to determine hunters’ thinking on the issue. The
hunter form is designed in two parts. The first part is related to the
demographic characteristics of hunters. The second section means detection
levels of the components of the culture of hunters.
In this research project, values forming culture of hunters were investigated in
context of leaders and heroes, ceremony and symbols, story and legends,
language, customs, norms and organizational socialization. Results of research
project will be used as basic data in controlling and training of hunters,
providing coordination and planning and sources.
Data obtained from the hunters were evaluated using frequency, percentage,
chi-square test, and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. In this
context, there were benefited from SPSS program and others.
Keywords: Hunting, Hunting Culture, Hunting and Wildlife Management,
İstanbul.

177

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2368">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/f3397baab42f3fdc9be7a3d48a60e930.docx</src>
        <authentication>d848a595269e0ed57843527564f4bdd4</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2369">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/1ac59d552e60dd523432fd817ffb1081.pdf</src>
        <authentication>fe7dda036e8cd40d55092ac21821bfed</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="13856">
                    <text>Determination of Cultural Characteristics of Hunters for Hunting and Wildlife
Management (The Case of Istanbul Province)
Ismail Safak
Aegean Forestry Research Institute, Izmir, Turkey
isafak35@hotmail.com
Taner Okan
Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
tokan@istanbul.edu.tr
Erdem Hızal
Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
hizal@istanbul.edu.tr
Tamer Keçecioğlu
Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
tamer.kececioglu@ege.edu.tr
Caner Işık
Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey
caner@adu.edu.tr
Sedat Acar
Mustafa Kemal Paşa National Park, Bursa, Turkey
sedatacar3495@hotmail.com
Abstract

Turkey has a rather important potential from the point of view of wildlife
resources which includes both species diversity and sheltering capacity. On the
other hand, wildlife in Turkey has been endangered since wilderness ecosystem
and habitats have been damaged and managed badly. There is a rather important
role of hunters in this process.
Hunting, which means catching of either living or lifeless animals that live
freely in the nature, has attracted attention of mankind almost in every term.
Hunting has been accepted as an important activity also today as well as in the
past. It is not a realistic approach considering the hunting passion which comes
to today with the traces from the past as nothing. Today, hunters have become a
guaranty of biodiversity and wilderness by getting an environmentalist status.
Associations, institutions and enterprises attach importance to knowing cultural
elements and factors that affect them. It has been used as an active instrument to
convey cultural data and to reach aims. In this context, researches that
determine human structure and cultural sensitiveness fields in the management
of wildlife resources are very important.
This article includes hunting clubs and their members in Istanbul. For this aim,
according to sample size, there were reached primary data using questionnaire
method which is prepared for hunters. Some data based on literature research
constitute secondary data of research. In the research, questionnaire form;

�cultural elements of hunters, profile of hunters and level of importance on the
issue of hunters were determined. Nine-point Likert Scale was used in some
questions to determine hunters’ thinking on the issue. The hunter form was
designed in three sections. The first part is related to the demographic
characteristics of the hunters. The second part reflects culture of Hunters’
Associations. In the last part; the levels of the perception of the cultural
components of the hunters have been included.
In this study, values forming culture of hunters were investigated in context of
leaders and heroes, ceremony and symbols, story and legends, language,
customs, norms and organizational socialization. Results of research project
will be used as basic data in controlling and training of hunters, providing
coordination and planning and sources.
Keywords: Hunting, Hunting Culture, Hunting and Wildlife Management,
Istanbul, Turkey.

Introduction
In the past, wildlife sources played an important role for livelihood and development of
communities. In this period, hunting and wildlife is used as nutrient (meat), clothing material
(leather and fur), rope and thread (sinews and musculocutaneous nerves), fuel (fats),
decorative ware (antler, tooth), beverage container (horns), musical instrument (skin, horn),
weapon (bone) etc. (Mbaiwa, 2002). As a matter of fact, in many countries even today, people
still make use of most of these benefits including nutritional element.
Hunting and Wildlife resources managers are faced with a situation such as to meet hunting
demands of a section of society without any harm to the environment and by improving the
existence of hunting and wildlife. While doing all these things there is an obligation to act in
accordance with the Principle of Sustainability. Resource management must ensure coordination between nature (ecosystems), hunters and the institutions managing these resources
so as to be able to complete this process successfully. Planning by ignoring the nature which
offers hunting and wildlife resources or by not taking hunters into consideration, will result in
failure.
Hunters should take their place in the organization of hunting and wildlife, thus take on
important tasks in combating with poaching and illegal hunting. Planning hunting in Turkey
and increasing the contribution of hunting to the national economy depend on the hunters
taking place in the organization in a conscious and systematic way. Also, the first way of
achieving this is to know the hunters together with their various aspects.
In Turkey; studies conducted in relation to hunting and wildlife focus on the biology of game
and wild animals and hunting methods. Studies on the social dimensions of hunting and
wildlife management have not been dealt with adequately. However, the continuous decrease
in the presence of hunting and wildlife day by day, efforts to make hunting and wildlife
resources sustainable, cause attentions to focus on the users of these resources. In fact,
discussions on the management of hunting and wildlife in Turkey gained momentum in the
late 1990s. The workshop (İzmir 23-25th March 1999) focused on the theme of new

�approaches in hunting and wildlife management and the final report of the relevant workshop
prepared by Geray (1999) are very important in terms of hunting and wildlife management.
Synergies gained in the workshop were also continued later on so that the law called 4915
Land Hunting Act, which was necessary for a legal solution to the problems encountered on
hunting and wildlife management, was enacted in 2003.
In the doctoral dissertation prepared by Iğırcık (2001) and entitled "Socio-Economic Analysis
on the Development of the Hunting Potential of Turkey"; the importance of the sustainability
in the hunting and wildlife resources management strategy was emphasized and the socioeconomic dimension of hunting was also given in comparison with other countries. Edited by
Bora (2001) and published by General Directorate of National Parks and Game Wildlife, "The
Book of Basic Education for Sustainable Hunting" forms the primary resource of training
courses for the hunters.
Also, researches on profile of the hunters, which have a very effective role in the use of game
wildlife resources, have been carried out since 2002. For this purpose, 4 pieces of researches,
aimed at determining the profile of hunters in the Aegean, Marmara, Eastern and South
Eastern Regions, were encountered. Elbek et al. (2002) conducted a study to determine the
profile of the land hunters in the Aegean Region. Also, Ay et al. (2005) determined the profile
of the hunters who had hunting cards in the Aegean region. Iğırcık et al (2005) investigated
the profile of the hunters in the Marmara Region. Fidan et al (2007) interviewed with the land
hunters in a total of 16 provinces including 8 cities representing the hunters and huntees in the
Eastern Anatolia Region and 8 cities representing the hunters and huntees in the South-eastern
Anatolia Region. Bora (2002) announced the results of the survey carried out for the hunters
participating in hunter training courses. In Özbay (2006) it was aimed to create a glossary of
Elazığ Territory Hunting Terminology by compiling the terms hunters used between each
other as a rapid communication medium and which have specific meanings and by analyzing
them with regards to structure and origin. In Şafak (2006a) a research was also applied on 96
hunters on İzmir-scale in order to determine the organization culture. Also, in Şafak (2006b)
the issue of conflict management in hunting was investigated. Within the scope of this
research, “conflicts” that might be subject to the management of game wildlife resources by
taking hunters' associations in the province of Izmir and the registered hunters of these
associations as an example.In Oğurlu (2008), place of wildlife resources in the economy, the
need for resource planning, resource planning method and how to create a model of wildlife
management plan unique to Turkey were discussed and the most remarkable major political
and administrative errors in today's wildlife management and current managerial problems
were mentioned. Also, in Çetinkaya (2010), hunting and hunting provisions in Islamic Fiqh
(jurisprudence) were analyzed in terms of Quran, Sunni and different opinions of Islamic
sects and the provisions Islam religion presented were tried to be determined.
In recent years, the cultural dimension is considered to be very important in terms of
management. The fact that "Hunting in Turkish Culture" themed International symposium
was held between 15 to 16th November 2006 by the Marmara University Turkic Studies
Research and Application Center also reveals research dimension of the subject matter. This
symposium shortly aimed to examine and document hunting forms in our culture, hunting
regime, kinds of the animals hunted, which animals are hunted in which regions, huntingrelated traditions, beliefs, legal regulations, prohibitions, hunting in literature and etymology
of hunting-related words.
The culture of the hunter is the total of the results of the beliefs, values, feelings and thoughts,
manners and customs created by certain human communities together with the results of

�relations between other people; which affect the outcomes of the ways and activities of
hunting. The basic elements of the culture of the hunter; can be grouped under the headings
of the values, leaders and heroes, rituals and symbols, stories and legends, language and
manners and norms. The culture of the hunter gives a distinct identity to the hunters, helps
them latch on to hunting and is shared by the hunters (Şafak, 2009). In Geray and Iğırcık
(2002), it is indicated that the culture of hunting in Turkey has not yet been established and
one of the most important threats to wild animals also comes from the hunters themselves.
Once again, it is emphasized that the vast majority of hunters do not have any idea about the
animals they hunt, that without obeying any of the rules they can fecklessly hunt wild animals
that come their way; of all types and all ages. In the same publication it is expressed that this
attitude the hunters have towards game animals and wildlife resources needs to change and it
is obligatory that they should adopt new values to become an environmentally-conscious
community (Geray and Iğırcık, 2002).
Studies are required in order to identify the cultural characteristics of the hunters in Turkey.
Most of the problems arise from not knowing the human nature and areas of cultural
sensitivity. The Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks needs to be aware of
the cultural characteristics for an effective and efficient resource management. When training,
rewarding, punishing the hunters, when making them peaceful and happy and in efficient
management the share of the knowledge of cultural features, in other words, the knowledge of
mental, and psychological structure is of great importance (Şafak, 2009).
If hunting and wildlife management problems analyzed in terms of their causes, and solution
methods, these problems seems to be in a very close relationship with the cultural structure of
the society. Indeed, in this study, the hunters in the province of Istanbul are determined by
considering them within the scope of cultural characteristics, values, leaders and heroes,
rituals and symbols, stories and legends, language, manners and norms and organizational
socialization. The aim of this study is to support the creation of a culture oriented and
effective strategy by putting forward the recognition of the hunters as of their cultural features
so as to protect, develop and attain sustainable management of the hunting and wildlife
resources.
Material and Method
There are 80 hunters' associations in the province of Istanbul. This study has been carried out
in 14 of hunters’ associations which are effectively active in Istanbul such as Bakırköy,
Beykoz, Büyükçekmece, Çatalca, Kadıköy, Kartal, Kazasker, Kemerburgaz, Silivri,
Sultangazi, Şile Oruçoğlu, Ümraniye and Zeytinburnu associations.
The data presented in this study have been obtained from field studies carried out together
with the managers of the hunter associations and the hunters. In this context, survey method
which is considered to be a systematic data collection technique has been utilized. The
questionnaire form consists of three sections. In the first part; demographic characteristics of
the hunters, in the second part; choices such as personal tendencies of the hunters, hunting
ground, and type and frequency of hunting and also in the last part; the levels of the
perception of the cultural components of the hunters have been included.
Within the scope of the cultural components, the importance the hunters attach to the issues
such as values, leaders and heroes, rituals and symbols, stories and legends, language,
manners and norms and organizational socialization has been questioned.

�For some of the questions which would take place in the hunters' questionnaire form, the
Nine-point Likert Scale was used in order to determine the importance the hunters attach to
the relevant issues. This scale is described in Figure 1. Their meanings in the Scale are; 1. Of
very little Importance, 3. Of little importance, 5. Moderately important, 7. Very Important
and 9. Highly important. 2, 4, 6 and 8 are used as preceding and subsequent mid-point of the
degrees of importance.
Figure 1 Nine-point Likert Scale

Of very little
Importance

Of little
importance

Moderately
important

Very
Important

Highly
important

Findings
Demographic Findings with reference to the hunters
The average age of hunters participating in the study in the province of Istanbul is 49.9. As
can be seen in Table 1, 54.4% of the hunters are above the age of 50 and approximately 34%
of those are in the 35-49 age range. When it comes to the distribution of occupation of the
hunters, 33% of the hunters are the artisans, 9.7% are the workers, 8.7% are the drivers and
8.7% are the farmers (Table 2). The professions in the "others" group include biologists, the
hospital managers, the fireman, accountants, and the self-employment. On the other hand
49.5% , approximately half, of the hunters are retired.
When occupational groups and age distribution are paired with, the state of having ability to
create leisure times and having the opportunity to act freely are thought to be effective in
cases where individuals turn towards hunting. Because, occupational groups such as artisans,
workers, farmers, being at the forefront and nearly half of the participants in the survey being
retired people draw this conclusion.
Table 1: Age Distribution of the Hunters
Age Groups

%

18-29

1,9

30-34

9,7

35-49

33,9

50-59

28,2

60 and above

26,1

Table 2: Distribution of Hunters by
Occupational Groups
Occupational Group
Farmers
Workers
Students
Artisans
Officers
Drivers
Engineer
Technicians
Teachers
Others

%
8,7
9,7
1,0
33,0
4,9
8,7
5,8
4,9
1,9
21,4

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

On the other hand, the lower ranks of teachers and students can be explained by their
lifestyles not being suitable for hunting. However there are no female hunters who
participated in the survey. All of the questionnaires were made with male hunters.
Table 3: Television channels watched (related to hunting)

TV Channel Name
Yaban TV
Chasse&amp;Peche
Documentary Channels
I do not watch

%
86,4
13,6
7,8
7,8

Hunters participated in the study were seen to prefer visual media usually related to
hunting and wildlife as field of training and communication. In Table 3, it can be seen that
whether hunters follow TV channels about hunting and wildlife or not. Accordingly,
percentage of those who do not follow any channels is 7.8%. Therefore, approximately
92% of the surveyed hunters were confirmed to follow visual media related to hunting and
wildlife. In the area the survey was conducted 86.4% portion of the hunters follow Yaban
TV, one of the national TV channels in Turkey. Within the documentary channels, TRT
Documentary, Chasse &amp; Peche, National Geographic, Discovery, Animal Planet, Toprak
TV, and Köy TV are preferred. At all associations where the survey was made it was
observed that that one of the mentioned channels was absolutely open. On the other hand,
it was also observed that magazines about hunting were followed. Also, it was seen that
there are library sections at some hunters' associations.
Findings in Concern with the Association Which Hunters are affiliated to and the
Culture Maintained in that Association
Table 4 shows association membership period of the hunters. Accordingly, mean
membership duration of hunters' association is 20,3 years. 58,2 % of the hunters are the
members of a hunters' association for more than 15 years. Zeytinburnu Hunting and
Shooting Sports Club Association have the longest membership duration of hunters'
association of 65 years. On the other hand, Arnavutköy Hunters Shooters and Amateur
Fishers Club Association have the shortest membership duration of 1 year.
Table 4: Membership duration of hunters' association

Membership period
1-5 year (s)
less than 6-10 years
11-15 years
16-20
21-25
more than 25 years

%
17,5
14,6
9,7
14,6
15,5
28,1

Whereas 63.1% association members know the establishment story of the relevant
association, 36.9% do not. In Table 5 the hunters were asked why they had become a
member of the association and they are asked to tell their 3 most preferred choices for the
6

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

membership. % 75,7 of the hunters stated that they became a member of the association
since they believed in "the necessity that the hunters should be organized". Accordingly,
"hunters' association should schedule various hunting programs" is in the second place
(35.0%), also for the hunters "the desire to receive training in hunting" is in the third place
(30.1%). Besides, the associations were observed to be the environments where the hunters
are socialized and where they exchange information on various topics.
Table 5: Reasons for Being a Member of the Hunters' Association
Reasons for Being a Member of the Hunters' Association
Since I believe that the hunters should be organized
Since it schedules various hunting programs
To receive training in hunting
To buy a hunting license at a cheaper price
No particular reason
To take advantage of opportunities such as clubhouse and amusement arcade
Others

%
75,7
35,0
30,1
15,5
10,7
8,7
16,5

According to the 74.8% of the hunters who are the current members of the association, the
relevant association refers to a location where they meet with their friends. Other reasons
are presented in Table 6. Accordingly, "a location where they can hand down to the next
generations of the culture of hunter " is in the second place (51.5%), also "conscious
hunting" is in the third place (45.6%).
Table 6: Meaning of the Hunter Association Which Hunters are affiliated to
The things Hunters' Association refers to
A location where I meet with my friends
A location where the culture of hunter will be handed down to the next generations
Conscious hunting
Love of nature
A place full of my memories
Training and application centre for the hunters
A place where I spend my free times
Dues payments and the bureaucracy
Other (Specify)

%
74,8
51,5
45,6
32,0
26,2
18,4
16,5
4,9
2,9

When Table 5 and Table 6 are taken together, it was seen that the hunters usually get
together at the associations they are affiliated to, exchange information on all matters and
they socialize at the same time.
Among the ones listed in table 7, the objectives the associations the hunters are affiliated
with attach importance to have been scored by the hunters via 1-9 scale. Accordingly,
preferences of "to help members fulfill bureaucratic procedures such as hunting permit and
hunting license", "to provide solidarity and cohesion among hunters" and "to ensure
gathering of the local hunters under a single roof" got the highest scores. There is a
contradiction between “Dues payments and the bureaucracy" option, which was preferred
by 4,9% in Table 6, and the one that is on the first rank here. In Table 7 it can be seen that
whereas hunters ignore "dues payments" title so as to be affiliated with the hunters'
associations, the associations make a lot of effort in this regard. The fact that associations
are recently entitled to get a share in dues payments to be transferred to public institutions
7

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

is thought to be among the main reasons for this situation. Besides, we can say that
associations less care about sociological activities or objectives. For example, "Social
activities for hunting, carrying out hunting organizations", option got the minimum score.
Similarly, “carrying out studies for the care, protection and reproduction of the game and
wildlife animals", “ensuring that new generations teach hunting" and “combating hunters
who hunt in an irregular and illegal way” options are scored less than the others.
Table 7: The Objectives the Hunters'Associations
The Objectives of the Hunters’ Association

Carrying out studies for the care, protection and reproduction of the game and
wildlife animals
Ensuring that new generations learn hunting
To ensure gathering of the local hunters under a single roof
To provide solidarity and cohesion among hunters
To help members fulfil bureaucratic procedures such as hunting permit and
hunting license
To ensure hunters hunt lawfully
Carrying out social activities and hunting organizations
Combating hunters who hunt in an irregular and illegal way
Help hunters receive training in hunting

Importance
score
6,3
6,3
7,1
7,2
8,2
7,2
6,0
6,4
6,6

According to the hunters the strengths of the Hunters' Association they are affiliated to be
shown in Table 8. Accordingly, "game chats and banter", "love of nature", "making
friends", "sharing the game animals" are the prominent headings. None the less, it is
possible to say that the hunters are in good condition in the fields of helping and supporting
each other.
Table 8: Strengths of the Culture at the Hunters’ Association
Powerful Components of the Culture

Importance
score

Game chats and banter
Love of nature, conscious hunting, environmental awareness, nature conservation
Making friends with the hunters of all ages and social classes
Affection and respect
Hunting with group of friends and sharing the game animals
Friendship and fraternity
Continuous implementation of hunting from past to present
Participating in the activities of solidarity such as hunting festival, banquet and
Islamic rituals and ceremonies
Participate in the special days, wedding and engagement of the members and
sending flowers
Sharing members' problems such as illness, death, economic hardships and so on
Exhibiting the pictures of the members
Going on a hunt organized by the association management
Exhibiting mounted game animals

7,8
7,7
7,6
7,5
7,5
7,4
7,4
6,8
6,7
6,5
5,9
5,4
4,0

When the hunters are asked whether there is someone they consider as a leader or they
hailed as a hero among themselves, current president of the association is highlighted.
8

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Association's president, who appears to be the leader in Table 9, has been put forward by
44%. In fact, the question asked has not fully served the purpose. The perception in
answering the question has turned towards the principle of the association who has the
ability to represent. On the other hand, it was expressed that at some of the associations,
there were also prominent members who came to the forefront with the leadership they
showed during the hunting activities.
Table 9: Leaders or Heroes at Hunters’ Association
Leaders or Heroes
Current president of the association
Some of the members
One of the members of the Board of Directors of the Association
Former president of the association
I have no idea
No, there aren’t any

%
43,8
17,9
8,0
5,3
10,7
14,3

In Table 10, the hunters were asked about the images expressing the cultural bond they
established with the associations they were affiliated. Accordingly, the vast majority of the
associations do not have an emblem. In these emblems, often components of the nature
such as dogs, rifles, hunters, birds, lakes and mountains are used. Of about 80% of the
associations do not have a standard outfit. Also, the majority of the "Yes, respondents"
assumed that as a dress. Associations do not usually have a special form of salutation. It
was seen that when hunters quit hunting, a special ceremony is held mostly for the
members who gained a place in the association (% 40). Substantially, an event is organized
at season openings.
Table 10: Cultural Images and Activities Reflecting the Hunters' Association
Preferred Images and Cultural Activities

Yes

No

I have no idea

%

%

%

65

28,2

6,8

Standard Outfit

15,5

77,7

6,8

Salutation

23,3

69,9

6,8

Common Terms and Concepts

13,6

59,2

27,2

Holding a Jubilee Ceremony for Those Who Quit Hunting

35,9

45,6

18,5

Organizing events such as banquet, entertainment, etc. at seasonal
openings or closings

84,40

10,70

4,9

Badges, Flags and Emblems

The hunters were asked about the sort of activities organized for the newly joined members
at the beginning. According to Table 11; it is seen that introduction/acquaintance response
comes forward. On the other hand, "shooting techniques", "weapons maintenance" and
"hunting techniques" altogether are significantly answered in relation to hunting.

9

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Table 11: Activities for Your Newly Joined Members
Name of the Event
We are introducing our friends
We are teaching dog care and training
We are teaching hunting techniques
We are giving first aid training
We provide information about gun care
Nature conservation
Respect for elders
We are teaching shooting techniques
We do not organize any events
I have no idea

%
57,3
13,6
30,1
9,7
16,5
23,3
21,4
21,4
10,7
16,5

Findings on Hunting Culture
Surveyed hunters answered the question "What is the motive that sparked your interest in
hunting?" by choosing alternatives on 1-9 scale. According to Table 12 it is understood
that the most important motivational tool was "love of nature". The response "motive to
be with friends" takes the second place and the response “physical activity" is also in the
third row. Preferences of "to provide economic benefits" and "to get nutrients" appeared
in the bottom rows. "Sense of shooting” and “motive of animal hunting" were in the
middle rows of the table. Both the options “to provide economic benefits” and “to get
nutrients" got highly low points. This is the point to be considered. Also, the score of
"animal hunting" option is in the middle ranks. This situation can be interpreted as a
transformation in hunting. Hunting has transformed from absolute activity of animal
hunting to a form of recreation. Looking at the results; "love of nature", "being together
with "friends", and “physical act" scored greater. As a matter of fact, the observation of the
hunting styles of the hunters hunting out with group of friends accompanied by food and
drinks, supports this finding.
Table 12: The Factors Effective in Sparking Interest in Hunting
Factor

In the period you first
started hunting

Love of nature
Being together with my friends
Physical act
Animal hunting
Shooting
To be alone in nature
To get nutrients
To provide economic benefits

7,5
7,3
6,5
5,6
4,8
3,8
2,2
1,5

Now
8,7
7,9
8,0
4,2
4,1
4,3
2,0
1,6

When asked about the change of these factors pushing people to hunt in the course of time,
in other words, when looked into "whether or not there are changes in motivational tools
which are effective in hunting as of the first day when they go hunting and today";
significant changes has not been determined. Just in time, the senses of animal hunting and
shooting are (albeit small) on the decline.

10

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

It has been determined that a large portion of hunters, nearly 71.8%, often wants to go
hunting with the same group of friends (Table 13). The rate of those who are open to new
friendships is 31%. Considered together with the results of the above table, hunters often
prefer to go on the hunt as friends and to socialize by doing so.

Table 13: Making New Friends for Hunting
New-friendship-relations
In general, I go hunting with my same friend
I prefer new friends even a little
I prefer new friends a lot
It does not matter with whom I go on hunting

%
71,8
31,1
8,7
8,7

A large portion of the hunters surveyed does not have any belief that they consider that it
brings good luck before or after the game. As can be seen in Table 14, 89% of the
respondents answered "no" to this question. Similarly, a large portion of the hunters
surveyed does not have any belief that they consider that it brings bad luck before or after
the game. 93% of the respondents answered "no" to this question.

Table 14: Superstitious Beliefs of the Hunters
Superstition
Do you have any beliefs that you consider that they bring
good luck before or after the game?
Do you have any beliefs that you consider that they bring
bad luck before or after the game?

Yes
(%)

No
(%)

10,7

89,3

6,8

93,2

In Table 15 various thoughts of the hunters about hunting activity are included. Hunters
stated their ideas on this subject by choosing alternatives on 1-9 scale. Looking at the
importance scores in Table 14, it is seen that hunters enjoy talking about the things done in
the previous game. Similarly, shooting related issues are also among the outstanding
conversation pieces. Escape of the game animals, return home empty-handed, unsuccessful
hunting activities are expressed as the situations which do not bother hunters. On the other
hand, it was observed that the hunters do not have a certain feeling about envying the
friends who realize a successful hunt.

11

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Table 15: Thoughts on the Hunting Activity

Topics

Importance
Score

To what extent do you talk about the things you did in the previous game in
your conversations with the hunters?
To what extent do you talk about the issues in relation to handing down to
the next generations of the natural resources in your conversations with the
hunters?
To what extent do you talk about weapons, sighting and shooting techniques
in your conversations with the hunters?
To what extent do you question the negative hunts you did in the past?

7,5

How much does it upset you when the game animal escapes?

3,3

How much does it bother you to return home empty-handed after the game?

2,5

How much do you like to show the animals you shot to your relatives after
the game?
How much do you like to fill the legal limits at the end of the hunting?

3,3

What is your level of jealousy during hunting?

2,0

What is the priority of your passion for hunting in your social life?

6,2

To what extent do unsuccessful hunts affect you psychologically?

2,5

How much support does your spouse or family provide you for hunting?

4,9

How much do you like if your child or grandchild goes hunting?

7,3

How much will photo hunting, which is carried out by a camera instead of
the rifle hunting, become widespread in future?

5,0

6,7

6,3
5,8

4,9

Hunters surveyed seemed to be willing about their children or grandchildren becoming
hunters. However, it has clearly been determined that hunting prevents their social life
from time to time and consequently the families do not support the hunters.
Conclusion
It is obvious that game and wildlife resources management in Turkey faces with a mission
such as restoring the hunting activity with the permanent principles, norms and values. At
present, the situation of the game and wildlife assets makes it a priority to propose this
solution offer. Not only the hunters but also those who manage the resource are required to
comply with the mentioned paradigm shifting. In other words, those who manage resources
in question and those who carry out the activity of hunting must be integrated. The best
way to accomplish this is to let hunters participate in game and wildlife management.
Therefore, the hunters should primarily be recognized with their all value judgments.
Without having information about social, economic and cultural structures of the hunters
who want to take advantage of hunting and wildlife resources, it is not possible to plan
hunting and to create effective strategies on a going forward basis.

12

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

In this study, with the data obtained from questionnaire study carried out face to face in
Marmara Region of Turkey distinguished in terms of industrialization and natural
resources and in the most important province of Turkey, the cultural state of the territorial
hunters has been revealed. The size of Istanbul in terms of population and industrialization
necessitated the changes in the socio-cultural characteristics of the hunters. In comparison
with the similar studies carried out in Anatolia it is seen that this study differs from the
other ones.
References
Ay, Z., Bilgin, F., Şafak, İ., Akkaş, M., E. (2005). Ege Bölgesinde Avlanma Kartı Olan
Avcıların Profilinin Belirlenmesi. Ege Ormancılık Araştırma Müdürlüğü, Teknik
Bülten No: 27, Müdürlük Yayın No:36, İzmir, 39 s.
Bora, M., E. (2001). Avcılığın Kısa Tarihi ve Özü, Sürdürülebilir Avcılık İçin Temel
Eğitim Kitabı. Orman Bakanlığı Milli Parklar ve Av-Yaban Hayatı Genel
Müdürlüğü Eğitim yayınları, Ankara.
Bora, M. E., (Editör), (2002). Sürdürülebilir Av ve Yaban Hayatına Doğru. Orman
Bakanlığı MilliParklar ve Av-Yaban Hayatı Genel Müdürlüğü, 384 s. Ankara.
Çetinkaya, Ö. (2010). İslam Fıkhında Avcılık ve Av Hükümleri. Marmara Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 142s.
Elbek, A. G., Uysal, İ., Saygı, H., (2002). Ege Bölgesi’ndeki Kara Avcı Profilinin
Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma, 30 s. İzmir.
Fidan, C., Orhan, C., Yalçın, Ö., Duran, C., Güldaş, N., Çelik, H. (2007). Doğu ve
Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Kara Avcılarının Profilinin Saptanması. Güneydoğu
Anadolu Ormancılık Araştırma Müdürlüğü, Yayın No :19, Teknik Bülten No: 11,
Elazığ, 69s.
Geray, A. U. (1999). Av ve Yaban Hayatı Yönetiminde Yeni Yaklaşımla İlgili Eğitim
Workshop’u Raporu, Orman Mühendisliği Dergisi, Yıl 36, S. 6.
Geray, A.U., Iğırcık, M. (2002). Türkiye’de Av Yaban Hayatı Eğitimi. Orman
Mühendisliği Dergisi, Yıl 39, S. 8, 5-10.
Iğırcık, M. (2001). Türkiye'nin Av Potansiyelinin Geliştirilmesine İlişkin Sosyo Ekonomik
Çözümleme. İ.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi), İstanbul.
Iğırcık, M., Yadigar, S., Bekiroğlu, S., Okan, T., Akkaş, M. E. (2005). Marmara Bölgesi
Avcı Profili. Ege Ormancılık Araştırma Müdürlüğü, Teknik Bülten No: 29,
Müdürlük Yayın No:38, İzmir, 27 s.
Mbaiwa, J.E. (2002). Past and Present Perspectives on the Sustainable Use of Wildlife
Resources Among Basarwa Communities in Ngamiland District, Bostwana: The
case of Khwai and Mabade. Bostwana Journal of African Studies, 16: 110-122.

13

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Oğurlu, İ. (2008). Yaban Hayatı Kaynaklarımızın Yönetimi Üzerine. SDÜ Orman
Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı:2, 35-88.
Özbay, E. (2006). Elazığ Yöresi Avcılık Terimleri Sözlüğü. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 143s.
Şafak, İ. (2006a). Av ve Yaban Hayatı Yönetiminde Avcıların Kültürel Özellikleri,
Ormancılıkta Sosyo-Ekonomik Sorunlar Kongresi (26-28 Mayıs 2006), Çankırı,
s:127-133.
Şafak, İ. (2006b). Avcılıkta Çatışma Yönetimi (İzmir İli Örneği), SDÜ Orman Fakültesi
Dergisi,Seri: A, Sayı:1, 46-61.
Şafak, İ. (2009). Avcı Derneklerine Üye Avcıların Kültürel Özellikleri (İzmir İli Örneği).
Acta Turcica, Yıl 1, Sayı 1, 327-343.
Acknowledgement
In this study, intermediate results of the TUBİTAK (Scientific and Technological Research
Council of Turkey) project, called "Determination of Cultural Characteristics and Profile
of Hunters (Balıkesir, Bursa and Istanbul Provinces)” and numbered 111K519, were used.
We would like to thank TUBİTAK for supporting this project.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13847">
                <text>1597</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13848">
                <text>Determination of Cultural Characteristics of Hunters in  İstanbul Province to Hunting and Wildlife Management  (İstanbul Province Case)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13849">
                <text>SAFAK, Ismail
OKAN, Taner
HIZAL, Erdem
KECECIOGLU, Tamer
ISIK, Caner
ACAR, Sedat</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13850">
                <text>Turkey has a rather important potential from the point of view of wildlife  resources which includes both species diversity and sheltering capacity. On the  other hand, wildlife in Turkey has been endangered since wilderness  ecosystem and habitats have been damaged and managed badly. There is a  rather important role of hunters in this process.  Hunting, which means catching of either living or lifeless animals that live  freely in the nature, has attracted attention of mankind almost in every term.  Hunting has been accepted as an important activity also today as well as in the  past. It is not a realistic approach considering the hunting passion which comes  to today with the traces from the past as nothing. Today, hunters have become  a guaranty of biodiversity and wilderness by getting an environmentalist  status.  As increasing economic and social welfare, first of all demands of hunters and  demands of stakeholders from wildlife sector are getting increased by varying.  In this context, it is obligatory to develop and reach a rationalist management  of wildlife potential that promises a great future of Turkey. In Turkey, lawful regulations were made in 2003 with act of 4915 to solve  problems of wildlife management. Wildlife management in Turkey still live a  transition period, problems are going on because new laws and its  implementations have not yet established. Among these problems, illegal  hunting, uneducated hunters, lack of hunter controlling have important place;  basic problems are social, cultural, economic and lack of scientific structure.  Associations, institutions and enterprises attach importance for knowing  cultural elements and factors that affect them. It has been use an active  instrument to convey cultural data and to reach aims. In this context,  researches that determine human structure and cultural sensitiveness fields in  the management of wildlife resources are very important.  There have been seen some researches which related to determine of hunter  profile since 2002. But, there are too few studies to determine cultural  characteristics of hunters. In this context, it is needed some studies for hunter  culture as related to management activities.  This research project includes hunting clubs and their members in İstanbul. For  this aim, according to sample size, there will be reached primary data using  questionnaire method which is prepared for hunters. Some data based on  literature research constitute secondary data of research.  In this research, questionnaire, called the hunter form, will be developed.  Hunter Form; cultural elements of hunters, profile of hunters and level of  importance on the issue of hunters were determined. Nine-point Likert Scale  was used in some questions to determine hunters’ thinking on the issue. The  hunter form is designed in two parts. The first part is related to the  demographic characteristics of hunters. The second section means detection  levels of the components of the culture of hunters.  In this research project, values forming culture of hunters were investigated in  context of leaders and heroes, ceremony and symbols, story and legends,  language, customs, norms and organizational socialization. Results of research  project will be used as basic data in controlling and training of hunters,  providing coordination and planning and sources.  Data obtained from the hunters were evaluated using frequency, percentage,  chi-square test, and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. In this  context, there were benefited from SPSS program and others.  Keywords: Hunting, Hunting Culture, Hunting and Wildlife Management,  İstanbul.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13851">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13852">
                <text>2013-05-10</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13853">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13854">
                <text>ISSN 978-9958-834-23-3     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
