<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=335&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-06-29T11:14:37+01:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>335</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>3494</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="789" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="904">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/07b1f29d06468be3ab105c22812f5ea8.docx</src>
        <authentication>4679302e34b40feb740e07cac9a7eb44</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="905">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/abc8811bdfd6741efcef204132a6cc3f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1e66593a51220aac1a56e62dd9701d54</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6392">
                    <text>Utilization of Social Media in Business Advertising in Central Bosnia Canton
Nafija Filipović
International Burch University
Bosnia and Herzegovina
filipovic_nafija@hotmail.com
Meliha Handžić
International Burch University
Bosnia and Herzegovina
meliha.handzic@ibu.edu.ba

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to investigate the utilization of social media in the context
of business advertising in Central Bosnia Canton. Typically, companies in Bosnia and
Herzegovina employ traditional advertising, but more recently these companies are starting to
use social media for alternative advertising and consequently becoming more satisfied. Most of
the companies are already developing efficient ways of promoting their goods and services
through social media. The remaining ones are getting in touch with such technologies. This study
used a survey method (online and via telephone) as the main research tool to examine 50
randomly chosen companies on their advertising strategies. The research model proposed for the
study consisted of the following variables: perceptions, usage and effects of social media on
business performance. The study found out that customer behavior, awareness of the potential of
social media, positioning and building the brand of the company, all play an important role in
the process of utilization of social media. On the basis of these study findings it can be concluded
that social media has a substantial influence on people and businesses. It is taking a major role
in advertising in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This developing trend provides a plenty of
opportunities for future research.
Keywords: Social media, advertising, perceptions, effects and usage of social media.

137

�137

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6384">
                <text>2598</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6385">
                <text>Utilization of Social Media in Business Advertising in Central Bosnia Canton</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6386">
                <text>FILIPOVIĆ, Nafija
HANDŽIĆ, Meliha</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6387">
                <text>The purpose of this study is to investigate the utilization of social media in the context of business advertising in Central Bosnia Canton. Typically, companies in Bosnia and Herzegovina employ traditional advertising, but more recently these companies are starting to use social media for alternative advertising and consequently becoming more satisfied. Most of the companies are already developing efficient ways of promoting their goods and services through social media. The remaining ones are getting in touch with such technologies. This study used a survey method (online and via telephone) as the main research tool to examine 50 randomly chosen companies on their advertising strategies. The research model proposed for the study consisted of the following variables: perceptions, usage and effects of social media on business performance. The study found out that customer behavior, awareness of the potential of social media, positioning and building the brand of the company, all play an important role in the process of utilization of social media. On the basis of these study findings it can be concluded that social media has a substantial influence on people and businesses. It is taking a major role in advertising in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This developing trend provides a plenty of opportunities for future research.  Keywords: Social media, advertising, perceptions, effects and usage of social media.  </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6388">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6389">
                <text>2014-04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6390">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6391">
                <text>ISSN 2303-4564     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2635" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3452">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/abe64c1576495e2c05427e6b3cbdcd70.pdf</src>
        <authentication>db0443009bffa567e421a3914fcb932c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="20662">
                    <text>Journal of Economic and Social Studies

Utilizing Information Systems for Measuring Impact on
Social Sustainability: Survey of Microcredit Organizations in
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Alica PANDZO

Department of Information Systems
Sarajevo School of Science and Technology
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
alica.pandzo@ssst.edu.ba

Kemal TALJANOVIC

Department of Information Systems
Sarajevo School of Science and Technology
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
kemal.taljanovic@ssst.edu.ba

Selma JAHIC

Microcredit Foundation Partner
Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract: Microfinance has been used selma@partner.ba
as a tool for social
sustainability and development since the 1970s. In
microfinance, assessment of social sustainability is often
conducted through client impact monitoring. This study explores
the impact measurement practices of microcredit organizations
in Bosnia and Herzegovina and their use of information systems
in this process. We draw on the latest trends of using shared
measurement systems for impact monitoring, to point out the
potential of using such systems to achieve sustainable impact on
wider social issues in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This paper
outlines the roles and responsibilities that different stakeholders
should play in the system development process.

KEYWORDS:

Microfinance, Microcredit, Bosnia
and Herzegovina, Social Impact,
Information Systems, ICT, Shared
Measurement Systems.

ARTICLE HISTORY

Submitted: 4 July 2012
Resubmitted: 17 October 2012
Accepted: 5 November 2012

JEL codes: O32, G21

219

�Alica PANDZO, Kemal TALJANOVIĆ &amp; Selma JAHIĆ

Introduction
Since its conception, microfinance has been promoted as an essential economic tool
for social sustainability and poverty alleviation. Microfinance is based on a premise
that providing financial services (most commonly in form of credit) to the most
vulnerable populations, who would otherwise not have access to standard bank
financing, would empower people to get out of poverty by capitalizing on their own
skills and ideas. In developing and post-conflict countries, such as Bosnia and
Herzegovina (BiH), microfinance has been used as a tool to raise employment and
revive economic activity by targeting micro-business by microcredit organizations
(MCOs). This ‘bottom up’ approach has received popularity as an alternative to the
traditional top-down approach used by international aid organizations to stimulate
economic growth and development through various projects and funds delivered to
governments of developing countries.1
Even though microfinance has been around since the 1970, there is still no
agreement on the real impact of microfinance. While many studies have shown
results of positive economic and social impact of microfinance (Dunn, 2005) the
appropriateness of different tools and methods applied is often questionable and
makes them impossible to compare. This has contributed to growing criticism of
microfinance in recent years (Bateman 2007, 2010, 2011). A recent study assessing
the use of microfinance in BiH (Welle-Strand et al., 2010) concludes that
microfinance is a better tool for improving individual economic performance of
micro finance institutions (MFI) and their individual clients, than for achieving
broader social goals. What is clear is that amidst such hard times and controversy,
having a clear social mission and the ability to track and measure organizations
realization of that mission and goals, is of increasing importance for individual
MCO and the microfinance sector as a whole. It is also clear that major social issues
such as poverty or equality cannot be solved by any single institution or type of
organization. Collaborative efforts and sharing of information and knowledge are
needed.

Journal of Economic and Social Studies
220

�Utilizing Information Systems for Measuring Impact on Social Sustainablity:
Survey of Microcredit Organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The increasing capability and availability of Information and Communication
Technologies (ICTs), is allowing innovative solutions to be applied in this field
supporting collaboration and resulting in resource and cost savings, while
maximising outputs. The latest trends in impact measurement systems are the
development of web-based systems which coordinate efforts of impact monitoring by
many different organizations who share the same social goals.
The goal of this study is to assess the current practices and potentials of using
information systems to support realisation of social mission and goals of
microfinance organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In order to do this, we focus
on answering the following research questions: 1. Do MCOs have a systematic
approach to measuring their social performance and impact? 2. Do MCOs have the
necessary ICT infrastructure and capabilities to support impact monitoring? 3. How
can information systems be used to more accurately and efficiently measure social
impact of microcredit at the level of BiH?
We first provide an overview of microfinance as a tool of social sustainability and
development and introduce the innovative ways in which ICTs are being used to
facilitate/enhance the process of social performance and impact measurement. We
then present the findings of an empirical study of social impact measurement
practices among MCOs in BiH. Recommendations are given for strengthening social
performance and impact monitoring practices of the microfinance sector in BiH by
applying the most innovative ICT trends in the field.
Overview of Microfinance
Social sustainability and microfinance
Social sustainability is an element of sustainable development which “occurs when the
formal and informal processes, systems, structures and relationships actively support the
capacity of current and future generations to create healthy and livable communities.
Socially sustainable communities are equitable, diverse, connected and democratic and
provide a good quality of life” (Barron and Gauntlett, 2002, pp.18). At a practical
level, social sustainability assessment is often conducted through social impact
assessment by focusing on principles such as income and employment, education,
skills, consumption or participation (Oman and Spangerberg in Colantonio, 2009).

221

�Alica PANDZO, Kemal TALJANOVIĆ &amp; Selma JAHIĆ

Modern microfinance was pioneered in the late 1970’s by a Bangladeshi banker and
economist, Muhammed Yunus, who used small credits as a way to provide self
employment to people (primarily women) who had talent but no money. Such
people could not access regular loan facilities through banks as they had no
collateral, were unemployed or worked in the informal sector hence could not prove
income generation. Hence, they would often fall prey to loan sharks charging huge
interest rates (Kumar, 2010).
The social objective most MCOs today is poverty alleviation, while many also focus
on small business start-ups, employment generation, empowerment of women,
increasing level of education among children and youth, etc. Poverty eradication is
also the no.1 Millennium Development Goal (MDG) with a target of cutting
extreme poverty in the world by half by the year 2015. To help achieve this goal,
the UN designated 2005 as the International Year or Microcredit, with a goal of
promoting access to finance to the poor.
It is now estimated that 160 million people in developing countries are today served
by microfinance through MFIs which range from small nonprofit organizations to
large commercial banks. In addition to microcredit, some offer other services such as
deposit, saving accounts, financial and business advice or marketing and technology
services. The average interest rate charged by MFIs is 27%, which is significantly
higher than what is charged by the banks (CGAP, 2006). High interest rates are
justified by higher risk profile of this client category and high administrative costs of
serving clients in remote areas
Even though the terms 'social performance' and 'social impact' are often used
interchangeably, it is important to stress the difference between the two. The Social
Performance Taskforce defines social performance as “the effective translation of an
institution’s mission into practice in line with accepted social values” so it is concerned
with effectiveness of internal organisational processes in order to achieve the
organisational mission. Social impact, is the improvement in the lives of people that
can be directly linked to organizations activities (SPT, n.d.). Social impact is
therefore just one element of social performance.

Journal of Economic and Social Studies
222

�Utilizing Information Systems for Measuring Impact on Social Sustainablity:
Survey of Microcredit Organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Microfinance in Bosnia and Herzegovina
BiH has a population of 3.8 million (BiH Agency for Statistics, n.d.). Microfinance
was first introduced to BiH in 1996, shortly after the war ended, through a Local
Initiatives Microfinance Project (LIP I) financed by the World Bank and a number
of donor countries. First MCOs issued loans to micro-businesses (both formal and
informal), who were affected by the war and otherwise had no access to regular credit
lines.
Currently there are 23 MCOs registered in BiH, of which 19 are non-profit
microcredit foundations (MCF) and 4 are profit microcredit companies (MCC).
Both types of institutions are limited to providing credit services, while deposit
taking is reserved only for banks. The Association of Microfinance Institutions
(AMFI) was formally set up in 2003 as a network which promotes synergies and
allows knowledge sharing and transparency between its members. Today, the 12
largest MCOs in BiH are members of AMFI and together they cover more than
98% of the market share in the country.
After 10 years of flourishing growth, end of 2008 marked the start of a crisis for the
microfinance sector in BiH. The downturn closely followed the 2008 economic
crisis. The most quoted reason for it by industry experts is the over-indebtedness of
clients. The over-indebtedness was caused by concentrated market competition and
erosion of MFI lending discipline (Chen, Rasmussen, and Reille, 2010). At the end
of 2011 the total portfolio of the microfinance sector in BiH was at EUR 308
million, which is drastically down from its peak of EUR 699 million at the end of
2008.The sector is now showing signs of improvement and recovery. Total MCO
sector has recorded a profit in 2011 (EUR 6.9 million), after two years of significant
sector losses (Banking Agency of FBiH and Banking Agency of RS, 2012).
ICT Enabled Trends and Innovation
There is quite a lot of guidance and information about tools and methods used for
social performance monitoring (SIM Pilot project, 2008, pp.6), however there is
very little about the use, effects and role of ICTs in supporting this process. As
majority of MCOs operate in developing countries and remote areas they commonly
have a problem with a lack of basic reliable ICT infrastructure and lack of local
knowledge (Blantz, 2010).
223

�Alica PANDZO, Kemal TALJANOVIĆ &amp; Selma JAHIĆ

Another common problem of effective outcome measurement is that it is made up of
isolated efforts, using non standardised methods and indicators, producing results
which cannot be compared. Major social issues such as poverty or child education
cannot be solved by efforts of any single program or type of organization. There is
also a lot of duplication of effort, time and resources as organizations with the same
objectives try to measure and evaluate their outcomes. Such issues, combined with
the advancements in ICT have led many organizations to develop innovative webbased systems for coordinating efforts in measuring performance and outcomes of
hundreds or thousands of social enterprises within a field (Kramer, Parkhurst, and
Vaidyanathan, 2009).
A report produced by FSG (Kramer et al, 2009) provides details of 20 such systems
and groups them into three different categories, characteristics and benefits of which
are summarised in the Table 1.
Table 1. Characteristics and benefits of shared measurement systems

Source: adapted from FSG report

Journal of Economic and Social Studies
224

�Utilizing Information Systems for Measuring Impact on Social Sustainablity:
Survey of Microcredit Organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Such systems can provide numerous advantages to all organizations with a social
mission and a need to measure performance and outcomes, including MFIs. Setting
up such systems requires strong leadership and engagement of different organizations
in the design phase. It also requires substantial funding through a multi – layer
development period (Kramer et al, 2009). Participating organizations often pay a fee
to have access to data a report generation, while they also input their own data into
the system.
Research Methodology
Current ICT capability and impact measurement practices of MCOs in BiH were
studied using a survey questionnaire and follow-up interviews. The data was
collected during March and April, 2012. The survey was sent to the person in charge
of ICT (IT managers) in all 23 registered MCOs, however for most organizations
marketing manager and IT managers both took part in completing the survey. The
survey questions can be grouped in the following main areas: Organisational goals
and services; ICT infrastructure, ICT use and management; Impact measurement
process; Perceptions.
Analysis of Results
We received a total of 10 survey responses of which 6 were followed up with phone
interviews. The survey response rate of 43% is considered satisfactory as the survey
was sent to all existing BiH MCOs and the 10 institutions that have responded cover
75% percent of the microcredit market in BiH. One of the respondents is registered
as a microcredit company, while the others are microcredit foundations. Figure 1
shows the distribution of surveyed MCOs.

225

�Alica PANDZO, Kemal TALJANOVIĆ &amp; Selma JAHIĆ

Figure 1. Size of MCOs according to portfolio size (left) and number of active loans
(right)

Organisational Goals
The prime target market for 60% of respondents is the low income population and
hence their primary development goals are poverty reduction and employment
generation. Second highly ranked target market are women, followed by microbusinesses. On average, 68% of clients are from rural areas. Average loan amount
issued is EUR 1,123.
ICT Infrastructure and Spending
Our results show that MCOs in BiH are overall well equipped with reliable ICT
infrastructure. All credit officers and office staff have PCs and use PCs them in
everyday tasks. 40% of organizations also supply their field credit officers with
laptops and 30% with mobile or smart phones. All credit officers have e-mail
accounts which they use daily and have access to internet at their offices. These are
pleasing results considering that a survey of internet usage in BiH conducted by
GFK in 2009, (UNDP, 2010, pp. 175) showed that only 30% of BiH companies
have internet connections.
50% of MCOs have their offices linked via a VPN, while all offices have their PCs
linked in a local network. MCOs employing over 50 staff, have IT/IS departments,
whereas the smaller ones usually have one person in charge of all ICT in the
organisation. Very little attention is paid to strategic use of information systems
which is reflected by non existence of IT strategy in 70% of surveyed MCOs. Use of
Journal of Economic and Social Studies
226

�Utilizing Information Systems for Measuring Impact on Social Sustainablity:
Survey of Microcredit Organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina

cross functional information systems is also low. Enterprise Resource Planning
system is implemented in one and Management Information Systems are used in
50% of the surveyed MCOs. None of the MCOs indicated use of CRM, GIS, DSS,
KMS or Experts Systems.
Impact Measurement Practices
Only two of the survey participants, collect information which is used in social
impact measurement. MCF EKI (EKI) was found to have a systematic approach to
measuring impact of microcredit on poverty – their primary development goal.
EKI’s strategic goal is to service 40% of poor clients, and at least 5% of these clients
to achieve a significant improvement within 12 months of taking out a loan. In
order to measure achievement of this end statement, EKI has developed its own
poverty assessment method, which is used to categorise all clients at the time they
first take out a loan. Indicators used in this categorization are: income, education,
housing, formal employment, no. of children, place of residence and physical ability.
A point scale is applied, and all client scoring over 6 points are categorized as poor.
Twelve months later, a sample of 300 clients from the poor category are followed up
in focus groups to assess whether there has been any significant improvement in their
quality of life. To assess quality of life EKI uses a second set of indicators which
include: monthly household income, possession of a car / PC / LCD, internet access,
level of competed education, preventative healthcare, travel outside of place of
residence, etc. EKI holds about 8 – 10 focus groups every year at different locations.
The results are a combination of qualitative and quantitative data (MKF EKI, 2009).
Field staff collects information from clients in paper form. Back at the office, the
data is inputted into a web-based, in-house developed system for collecting and
analyzing impact data.
MCF Partner (Partner) was founded by Mercy Corps in late 2000. Partner is focused
on creation of jobs, increased income and creating a more stable environment.
Partner's target population is rural (84.91% of active clients) and women (42.62 %
of active clients) (Partner, n.d). Partner has initiated the incorporation of social
performance management (SPM) into all business processes, which include: strategic
planning, client relationships (loyalty and adjusting our service and product offer to
clients' needs), financial management, human resources, information systems and
organisational culture. Poverty measurement tools used by Partner are per capita
household expenditure and per capita household income.

227

�Alica PANDZO, Kemal TALJANOVIĆ &amp; Selma JAHIĆ

Another MCO, not included in our results, who has been actively managing its
social performance and impact is MCF Prizma (Prizma). With 67,742 active
borrowers, and employing over 250 staff, Prizma is also amongst the largest MCOs
in BiH (Prizma MKF, n.d). Prizma explicitly targets poor entrepreneurs (primarily
women). Like EKI, Prizma has developed its own poverty assessment scorecard
which is used in poverty monitoring by assessing clients on entry and every time they
take out a new loan. The following indicators are included as part of the poverty
scorecard: education level of woman partner or household head, residence,
employment status, family size, the frequency of the consumption of luxury foods
(sweets and meat) and the ownership of a television, stereo and motor vehicle
(IFAD, 2009, pp.35). Prizma also conducts exit monitoring twice a year, using semistructured interviews. The third component of Prizma’s social performance
monitoring system are focus groups, used to obtain information on reaching, serving
and impacting the target market
(Crnkic, 2010). The Social Performance
Management information system at Prizma is developed internally and consists of
five core components: monitoring poverty outreach, monitoring the change of
poverty status, exit monitoring, client satisfaction monitoring and focus group
discussions.
Perceptions
The final section of the questionnaire looks at participants perceptions regarding the
effectiveness of the outcome measurement process within their organisation, the use
of ICT by staff in general and use of ICT to support the outcome measurement
process. Table 2 show the average answers to those questions. Scale: 1- strongly
disagree, 5 – strongly agree.

Journal of Economic and Social Studies
228

�Utilizing Information Systems for Measuring Impact on Social Sustainablity:
Survey of Microcredit Organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Table 2. Perceptions category averages
Question
a) The results of measuring the impact of microcredit are of great importance to
strategic planning in our organisation
b) The process of measuring impact is of crucial importance to our organisation
c) My organisation has effective, systematic approach to measuring social impact
on customers.
d) My organisation is using ICT to support the process of social impact
measurement in the best possible way
e) Employees of my organisation are highly capable in conducting their everyday
work tasks using a computer.
f) Employees within my organisation are willing to accept new technologies and
adjust to the new ways of carrying out their work.
g) MIS in my organisation is highly effective for collecting, analysing and reporting
on our social impact.
h) The existing system for measuring impact of microcredit allows us for effective
monitoring of the realisation of our strategic goals.
i) The existing system for measuring impact of microcredit allows us to effectively
evaluate our existing products and develop new products.
j) Government of BiH should work more on setting up a system of social
performance monitoring.
k) Having access to a central database of social performance measures at the level of
Bosnia and Herzegovina would be of great value to our organisation.
l) We are willing to share the results of our measurements with other organizations
for mutual benefits.

Average
3.8
3.7
2.1
2
4
3.8
3.3
2.5
2.5
4.5
4.5
4.2

Some MCOs who in the previous section answered that they do not collect data that
can be used for social impact measurement rated the effectiveness of their process
and MIS in supporting the impact measurement process, fairly highly. We interpret
this inconsistency as an indication of a lack of understanding of the social impact
measurement process. A large majority of the MCOs agrees that a central database of
social performance measures at the state level is needed (questions j. and k. in table
2). There is also a very high level of willingness to share the results of measurements
with other organizations for mutual benefits (4.2). MCOs appear to have highly
skilled IT staff and employees who are willing to embrace new technologies.
Respondents were asked to rate which of the given issues pose the biggest obstacle to
the optimisation of the social impact measurement process for their organisation.
Table 3 shows the total points awarded to each issue. Scale: 1 – smallest issue, 5 –
biggest issue.

229

�Alica PANDZO, Kemal TALJANOVIĆ &amp; Selma JAHIĆ

Table 3. Perceived obstacles for optimisation of the impact measurement process
Stated issue
Lack of coordination at the level of the sector
Lack or inconsistency of legislation
Lack of human resources for conducting field studies
Lack of knowledge about impact measurement methods
Lack of accurate information received from clients
Lack of information about the benefits of impact studies for MCOs
Lack of awareness about the need to measure impact
Lack of financial resources
Lack of skilled IT staff
Lack of management support

Total Points
44
42
38
36
34
32
30
30
26
20

Highest ranking issue was the lack of coordination at the level of the sector (44).
This indicates that there is an agreement amongst MCOs about the need to pool
efforts and minimise duplication. Lack of financial resources and field staff was rated
as an issue by smaller MCOs. Lack of skilled IT staff and management support was
consistently rated as a low issue across all MCOs.
Discussion
Our results show that MCOs in BiH are overall well equipped with reliable ICT
infrastructure. MCOs also appear to have (based on their perceptions) highly skilled
IT staff and employees capable of using ICT to perform their business tasks and
willing to embrace new technologies. However, very little attention is paid to
strategic use of information systems which is reflected by non existence of IT policy
in 70% of surveyed MCOs. ICTs should be viewed as one of key organizational
resources and not just as a support function or a cost. This means that ICT can play
a crucial role in realisation of organizational goals. Organizational goals (social and
financial) have to be aligned with IT goals and applications must be developed and
implemented according to those plans in order to ensure that goals are achieved most
efficiently.
Overall, MCOs in BiH show a low commitment to systematically managing their
social performance and measuring social impact. Majority do not have systems in
place for assessing and tracking the realisation of their social mission. Reports and
data presented on MCOs websites is focused on financial indicators, with social
indicators being obviously neglected. MCOs need to put more effort into showing
equal commitment to both elements of the double-bottom-line. This study found
only three MCOs who have placed considerable Journal
amountofofEconomic
effort inand
systematically
Social Studies
230

�Utilizing Information Systems for Measuring Impact on Social Sustainablity:
Survey of Microcredit Organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina

managing their social performance. All three are funded by international aid agencies
for whom social performance is a key issue These MCOs have built notable internal
expertise in managing social performance and two have developed their own
measurement tools and methods such as the poverty assessment scorecard developed
by MCF Prizma (IFAD, 2006 and Crnkic, 2010,) and MCF EKI (MKF EKI,
2009).
During phone interviews 4 MCOs said that they had to put in a lot of time and
effort into conducting assessment of market potential studies, as no statistical data
was readily available. Availability of measure such as (household income, average pay,
level of education, etc.) would have cut down on time and duplication of effort
across MCOs. BiH has undergone many changes over the last 20 years, especially
after the war in early 1990s .The last census was conducted just before the war broke
out in 1992. Many people have migrated since then or have been displaced. Because
of this lack of centrally managed data, there is a lot of duplication of effort and
resources in the MCO and NGO sector in general.
Centralised data is currently available through AMFI and the Central Bank of BiH.
AMFI members quarterly report on financial data which is distributed to all
members. The Central Credit Registry of Central Bank of BiH is a database off all
individuals and legal entities in the country indebted with commercial banks,
microcredit organizations, savings - credit organizations and Leasing. This registry is
used for checking client credit history by the same institutions and the registry is
updated daily since April 2012 (Public relations of CBBH, 2012).
Conclusion and Recommendations
The goal of this research was to assess the current practices of using information
systems to support realisation of social mission and strategic goals of microfinance
organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Our findings show that the existing ICT
infrastructure capabilities are at a pleasing level but they are not being effectively
used by MCOs for monitoring and evaluating their social mission. We recommend
that the best way to achieve better results in this field is by developing a shared
measurement system for impact monitoring at the level of microcredit sector in BiH.
Use of such system would enable the coordination of efforts within the microcredit

231

�Alica PANDZO, Kemal TALJANOVIĆ &amp; Selma JAHIĆ

sector which is necessary in order to achieve broader social goals. Further research is
needed to investigate the most appropriate type of shared measurement system,
impact measurement methodologies and measures that should be reported on.
Implementation of such systems is not an easy task and relies on commitment from
various stakeholders. We will try to briefly outline the possible responsibilities of
those different stakeholders. Donors and creditors can play a big part by funding
different phases of shared system development. They can also influence MCOs to
pay more attention to achieving their social mission, by putting more weight on
evidence of social performance management practices when providing future
financing to MCOs. The association of microfinance institutions in BiH – AMFI
has a big role to play in promoting, educating and raising awareness about social
performance management practices among its members. They should further
promote the achievements that some of their members have made in this field and
encourage collaboration. AMFI could also be the central coordinator for the
planning and development of the shared system of impact measurement at the sector
level. Another possible coordinating body could be the Central Bank of BiH.
Whoever decides to take on this complex task needs to show good leadership and
coordination ability.
A possible limitation could be the willingness of MCOs to provide social data on
their clients and the regulatory limitations regarding privacy of information. Even
though participants in our study indicated high level of willingness to share data, this
should be further explored. Accuracy of data provided by clients may also be an
issue, as indicated by participants of our study. Use of shared systems for impact
measurement should be further explored by the microfinance sector in BiH as it has
potential to play a key role in solving major social problems. Further research is
needed to investigate the most appropriate type of shared measurement system,
impact measurement methodologies and measures that should be reported on.

Journal of Economic and Social Studies
232

�Utilizing Information Systems for Measuring Impact on Social Sustainablity:
Survey of Microcredit Organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina

References
Banking Agency of Federation of BiH. (2012). Information about the microcredit
system of Bosnia and Herzegovina, on 31-12-2011. Sarajevo, BiH. Retrieved from
http://www.fba.ba/images/Micro_Documents/Informacija_MKO_31122011_bos.p
df
Banking Agency of Republic of Srpska. (2012). Report on the current state of the
banking system of Republic of Srpska as at 31-12-2011. Banja Luka, BiH.
Barron, L., &amp; Gauntlett, E. (2002). Stage 1 report – Model of social sustainability,
Housing and sustainable communities indicators project.
Perth, Australia:
WACOSS.
Bateman, M. (2007). De-industrialization and social disintegration in Bosnia. In T.
Dicher &amp; M. Harper (Eds.) What’s wrong with microfinance? Warwichshire:
Intermediate Technology Publications.
Bateman, M. (2010). Why doesn’t microfinance work? The destructive rise of
neoliberalism. New York, NY: Zed Books.
Bateman, M. (2011). Confronting microfinance: Undermining Sustainable
Development. Sterling, USA: Kumarian Press. ISBN 978-1-56549-341-4.
Dunn, E. (2005). Impact of microcredit on clients in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Final
report, Sarajevo and Banja Luka: LIP II. Retrieved from http://www.europeanmicrofinance.org/data/file/benchmark/Impacts_of_microcredit_on_clients_in_BiH.
pdf
BiH Agency for statistics. (n.d). Retrieved from http://www.bhas.ba/
Blantz, E. (2010). Accelerating microfinance impact with ICT: Learning from
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Sierra Leone. San Francisco, CA:
Inveneo.
Retrieved
from
http://www.inveneo.org/download/accelerating_microfinance_impact_with_ict_03_
2010.pdf

233

�Alica PANDZO, Kemal TALJANOVIĆ &amp; Selma JAHIĆ

CGAP. (2006). Why do MFIs charge high interest rates?
http://www.cgap.org/p/site/c/template.rc/1.26.1309/

Retrieved from

Chen, G., Rasmussen, S., &amp; Reille, X. (2010). Growth and Vulnerabilities of
Microfinance.
Washington,DC:
CGAP.
Retrieved
from
http://www.microfinancegateway.org/gm/document-1.9.42432/Growth
and
Vulnerabilities.pdf
Colantonio, A. (2009). Social sustainability. Linking research to policy and practice.
Paper presented at the conference “Sustainable development: A challenge for
European research”, Brussels, 26- 26th May 2009.
Crnkic, K. (2010). Managing social performance through integrated approach –
Prizma case study. Collection of monographs No.13. Madrid, Spain: Foro nantik
lum de microfinanzas. ISBN: 978-84-693-2691-6.
IFAD, (2006). Assesing and managing social performance in microfinance. Rome,
Italy: IFAD. Retrieved from http://www.ifad.org/ruralfinance/pub/performance.pdf
Kramer, M., Parkhurst, M., &amp; Vaidyanathan L. (2009). Breakthroughs in shared
measurement and social impact. FSG Social Impact Advisors. Retrieved from
www.fsg.org
Kumar, V. (2010, April 15). Need to draw a line between microfinance and loan
sharking:
Prof
Yunus.
Microfinance
focus.
Retrieved
from
http://www.microfinancefocus.com/news/2010/04/15/need-to-draw-a-line-betweenmicrofinance-and-loan-sharking-prof-yunus/
MKF EKI. (2009). Changes in poverty lines. Retrieved from
http://www.mixmarket.org/sites/default/files/EKI_Changes_in_poverty_lines_for_
MIX.doc
Partner MKF, (n.d)
http://www.partner.ba

Partner

Microcredit

Foundation.

Retrieved

from

Prizma MKF. (n.d). Welcome to the Microcredit Foundation Prizma. Retrieved from
http://www.prizma.ba/index.php?lang=en
Journal of Economic and Social Studies
234

�Utilizing Information Systems for Measuring Impact on Social Sustainablity:
Survey of Microcredit Organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Public relations of CBBiH. (2012). Daily updating of the Central credits registry.
Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sarajevo 26.04.2012. Retrieved from
http://www.cbbh.ba/index.php?id=809&amp;lang=en
Social Performance Taskforce (SPT). (n.d) What is social performance? Retrieved
from http://www.sptf.info/what-is-social-performance
SIM pilot project. (2008). Social impact measurement: Project document. Results of
a pilot project to develop a tool for measuring social impact of microfinance. Dakar Fann, Senegal: INAFI International Foundation.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2010) eGovernanace and ICT
Usage Report for South East Europe - 2nd Edition, Sarajevo: UNDP
Welle-Strand, A., Kjollesdal, K. &amp; Sitter, N. (2010). Assesing microfinance: The
Bosnia and Herzegovina case. Journal Managing global transitions, 8 (2) 145 – 166.
University of Primorska, Faculty of Management. Retrieved from
http://www.bi.edu/OsloFiles/MICRO/2010/Assessing%20Microfinance.pdf

(Endnotes)
1

The traditional top-down approach provides large sums of aid to governments of
developing countries, with benefits expected to trickle down to citizens.
However a large percentage of the aid is lost in costly logistics, political
interference and corrupt practices. The bottom-up approach consists of issuing
aid (in form or loans) directly to individual citizens.

235

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20655">
                <text>1395</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20656">
                <text>Utilizing Information Systems for Measuring Impact on Social Sustainability: Survey of Microcredit Organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20657">
                <text>Alica , Pandzo
Kemal, TALJANOVIC
Selma, JAHIC</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20658">
                <text>Microfinance has been used as a tool for social sustainability and development since the 1970s. In microfinance, assessment of social sustainability is often conducted through client impact monitoring. This study explores the impact measurement practices of microcredit organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina and their use of information systems in this process. We draw on the latest trends of using shared measurement systems for impact monitoring, to point out the potential of using such systems to achieve sustainable impact on wider social issues in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This paper outlines the roles and responsibilities that different stakeholders should play in the system development process.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20659">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20660">
                <text>2012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20661">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="17">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General),HB Economic Theory,HG Finance</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="957" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1093">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/705b053c30a082f4aed6ec420b57c38e.docx</src>
        <authentication>23095cee8fa55a6e370e3a54ae1d0086</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="1094">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/5a3886c4f2791156d286a26c1fc3f4be.pdf</src>
        <authentication>208ee1eab4706964267ebaf627f28454</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="7660">
                    <text>Prof. dr. Kadrija Hodžić
Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Tuzli
Doc. dr. Edin Osmanbegović
Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Tuzli

UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE
U URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA
Sažetak
Autori polaze od teze da je korupcija u urušenim tranzicijskim
društvima, što dokazuju na primjerima Bosne i Hercegovine, Srbije i Crne
Gore, pravilo sa kvalifikacijama "sistem(at)ske bolesti." Sistem(at)ski uzroci
korupcije inicirani su i produbljeni obrisima tranzicione krize, koju
karakteriziraju uslovi za pohranjivanje korupcije: institucionalna
neizgrađenost društva, produbljeni nivo siromaštva i nepripremljena
privatizacija. Povijesno-kulturološki okvir u kome su se ove zemlje razvijale
dodatno komplicira percepciju korupcije. Dok u Bosni i Hercegovini ovi
izvori leže u novom (temeljem Daytonskog ugovora) etnički razdjeljenom
ustrojstvu državne zajednice i primjenjenom obrascu neoliberalnog razvoja, u
kome političko nacionalne elite svoju korumpiranost pokrivaju divergentnim
vizijama o Bosni i Hercegovini, u Srbiji se korupcija veže za jednonacionalnu
„partijsku državu“ i državnu regulaciju, a u Crnoj Gori korupcija proizilazi iz
tradicionalističkog, homogenog društva, karakterističnog po političkom
uvezivanju obiteljskih klanova i posebne crnogorsko arhaične institucije
kumstva. Ostatak regiona Zapadnog Balkana (Albanija, Kosovo), bez obzira
na izvjesne napretke, ima još veću podložnost korupciji. U na ovaj način
urušenim tranzicijskim društvima korupcija je postala uobičajeni «način
života». Budući da je pitanje korupcije povezano i u sprezi je sa
organizovanim kriminalom (uvezanog ili iniciranog sa nivoa političke i
ekonomske moći) problem korupcije, po pravilu, ima i regionalnu dimenziju.
Nijedno od tri pomenuta društva, kao ni većina ostalih u ambijentu
Zapadnog Balkana ne mogu sama rješavati ovaj problem, pa autori upučuji
na primjenu međunarodnih standarda i pomoć međunarodnih institucija, koji
će pomoći izgradnju normativne infrastrukture u cilju suzbijanja korupcije,
ali i doprinijeti poticaju ekonomskog rasta i održivoj demokratiji civilnog
43

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

društva.
Autori skreću pažnju i na otvorene teorijsko-ideološke dileme o
prirodi nastanka korupcije. Dilema je upravljena na izbor između dva
pristupa: (1) da li se korupcija veže za nesposobnost vlada da kroz pravni
sistem uspostave efikasne kontrole javnih tokova i onemogućavanja
korišćenja javne službe za privatne ciljeve, ili se (2) korupcija veže za
nepostojanje tržišta i otvaranje prostora za uspostavljanje monopola u
odlučivanju. Od odgovora na ovu dilemu umnogome ovise konceptualiziranja
strategija i mjera sprječavanja korupcije. U prvom slučaju, odgovor u
pojednostavljenom iskazu podrazumjeva uspostavljanje jake države i vlade
spremne da se uhvati u koštac sa korupcijom (dakle, povećane javne kontrole
i razine regulacija), a u drugom, odsustvo monopola (dakle, širenje slobode
tržišta). Ovu dilemu autori prevazilaze s tezom da je moguće prevazići
korupciju ako ustanovimo da je "jaka država", zapravo, neophodna radi
nesmetanog funkcioniranja tržišnog mehanizma i njegovih osnovnih
institucija, prije svega zaštite svojine i ugovora, a ne radi uspostavljanja
levijatanske birokracije.
Ključne riječi: korupcija, tranzicija, urušena tranzicijska društva, „balkansko
društvo“, Bosna i Hercegovina, Crna Gora, Srbija.

44

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

INTRODUCTION TO THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF
CORRUPTION IN A WEAKENED TRANSITIONAL
SOCIETES
Abstract
The authors thesis revolves around the issue of corruption in transitional countries and underlines the examples of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Serbia and Montenegro. Moreover, they define corruption as a «systematic
disease» in the above mentioned countries. Systematic causes of corruption
are initiated and intensified by transitional crises, characterized by: lack of
proper institutional development, deep rooted level of poverty and
unprepared privatization. While in Bosnia and Herzegovina, these sources lie
in the new (Agreement in Dayton) ethnically divided in the organization of
the state union and implemented neoliberal model of development, in which
the national political elite corruption cover their divergent term visions of
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, corruption is bound to uninational "party
state" and state regulation, and Montenegro corruption stems from the
traditionalist, homogeneous society, characterized by its political linking
family clans and special Montenegrin archaic institution godfather. The rest
of the Western Balkans (Albania, Kosovo), regardless of some progress,
there is an increased susceptibility to corruption. In this way corruption in
weakened transitional societies has become «ordinary»way of life. Since the
problem of corruption is closely related to organized crime (organized and/or
initiated from the top level of political or economic power) corruption has
also become a regional problem. The above mentioned societies of Bosnia
and Herzegovina and Montenegro cannot solve the problem of corruption on
their own, rather as authors suggest, international organizations shoud
provide aid in the form of construction of normative infrastructure aimed at
eradication of corruption. In addition, this type of aid should bring about the
progress of economic development and sustainable democracy of civil
society.
The authors draw attention to the open theoretical and ideological
dilemmas about the nature of the occurrence of corruption. The dilemma is
directed to a choice between two approaches: (1) to the legal whether
corruption is linked to the inability of the government system to establish
effective control of public flows through the legal system and prevent the use
45

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

of public office for private goals, or (2) the corruption is linked to the lack of
market and to the possibility of establishing a monopoly in decisionmaking. Forming strategies and measures for preventing corruption depends
largely on the answers to this dilemma. In the first case, the answer in a
simplified statement, implies the establishment of a strong state and
government prepared to grapple with corruption (i.e., an increased level of
public scrutiny and regulation), and second, the absence of monopoly (i.e.,
the expansion of the free market). Authors solved this dilemma with the
thesis that it is possible to prevent corruption prevail if we establish that a
"strong state", in fact, is necessary for the functioning of the market
mechanism and its basic institutions, primarily to protect property rights and
contracts, and not to establish a leviathan -bureaucracy.
Key words: corruption, transitional, weakened transitional societies, "Balkan
society," Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia.

46

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

UVOD: KORUPCIJA – ODAKLE DOLAZI I KAMO IDE?
Korupcija je teška društvena bolest od koje nije imuna, gotovo, ni
jedna zemlja na svijetu, zbog čega je problem korupcije, s pravom, označen
«problemom stoljeća»,1 iako je korupcija, kako u svom sažimanju opće
povijesti korupcije pokazuje C.A. Brioschi2, povijesna konstanta od vremena
prvih civilizacija do današnjih demokratskih oblika vladavine. Od prvog
(1995) do posljednjeg izvještaja International Transparensy-a (2012)
zadržana je konstatacija o korupciji kao „glavnoj prijetnji s kojim se suočava
čovječanstvo“, koja „razara živote i zajednice, i potkopava zemlje i
institucije“ i „prijeti da će dodatno destabilizirati društva i pogoršati nasilne
sukobe.3
Ako se pođe od standardne ekonomske metodologije i zanemare
pristupi moralisanja kao osnove analize i kritike korupcije, onda se prema
Begovićevom pristupu analitičkog tretmana korupcije artikuliraju četiri
uobičajena metodološka temelja ekonomske teorije:4 prvi se odnosi na
mogućnost izbora od strane pojedinaca, tj. pitanje hoće li se upustiti u
korupciju ili ne; drugi ukazuje na uvjerenje da je pojedinac prilikom izbora
osjetljiv na podsticaje iz okruženja, tj. da u zavisnosti od njih uobličava svoju
odluku; treći pokazuje da pojedinac prilikom donošenja odluke hoće li se
uključiti u korupciju polazi od podsticaja tako što vrši kalkulaciju o
potencijalnim koristima i troškovima te akcije, trudeći se da maksimira svoju
funkciju korisnosti; i četvrti metodološki temelj se odnosi na analitičara na
čijoj ravni korupcija nije uvijek „loša sama po sebi, već tek onda kada se
pokaže da su njeni ukupni (neto) efekti negativni“. Tek takav vrijednosno
neutralan, „hladan pristup“, kako ga Begović označava, omogućuje
racionalnu analizu korupcije i njenih efekata, daleko bolju nego onaj
sentimentalno-moralistički.
Na pojavu korupcije utiču mnogi faktori društvene, ekonomske,
političke, kulturne i obrazovne strukture, odnosno podstrukture. Međutim,

1

Korupcija i mito su označeni „problemom stoljeća“ na Međunarodnoj konferenciji o sprječavanju
mita i korupcije, koja je održana u Istanbulu 16-17 aprila 2005. godine.
2
Brioschi, C.A. (2007), Kratka povijest korupcije, MATE, Zagreb.
3
Corruption Perceptions Index 2012. Full table and rankings. Transparency International. Retrieved: 4
February 2013., dostupno na www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview.
4
Begović, B. (2007), Ekonomska analiza korupcije, CL DS, Beograd.

47

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

ostaje otvoreno teorijsko pitanje, koje zadire u ideološke vrijednosne sisteme,
a koje otvara dilemu da li se, načelno, korupcija može vezati za
(ne)sposobnost vlada da kroz pravni sistem uspostave efikasne kontrole
javnih tokova i onemogućavanja korišćenja javne službe za privatne ciljeve,
ili se korupcija veže za nepostojanje tržišta i otvaranje prostora za
uspostavljanje monopola u odlučivanju. Od odgovora na ovu dilemu
umnogome ovise konceptualiziranja strategija i mjera sprječavanja korupcije.
U prvom slučaju, odgovor u pojednostavljenom smislu podrazumjeva
uspostavljanje jake države i vlade spremne da se uhvati u koštac sa
korupcijom (dakle, povećane javne kontrole i mreže regulacija), a u drugom,
odsustvo monopola (dakle, širenje slobode tržišta). Ovu dilemu je, ipak,
moguće prevazići ako ustanovimo da je "jaka država", zapravo, neophodna
radi nesmetanog funkcionisanja tržišnog mehanizma i njegovih osnovnih
institucija, prije svega zaštite svojine i ugovora, a ne radi uspostavljanja
levijatanske birokracije.
Ono što, u osnovi, korupcija ostavlja kao svoje ekonomske posljedice
jesu ugrožavanje sigurnosti investicija (procjene u Italiji pokazuju da svaki
stepen povećavanja razine korupcije smajuje priliv stranih ulaganja za 16 %),
povećava transakcione troškove preduzeća, smanjeni ekonomski rast,
povećava nezaposlenost, te u krajnjoj instanci, ugrožava kredibilitet
funkcioniranja tržišta uopšte. Nivo korupcije je različit u svakom društvu. U
razvijenim zemljama zapadne demokratije, naročito u zemljama sjeverne
Evrope, sa razvijenim institucijama društva, uz prisutno socijalno povjerenje
uključujući institucije za borbu protiv korupcije, takva negativna društvena
pojava je ekcesno stanje, iako ni ovdje nisu rijetki slučajevi upletenosti
„javnih“ dužnosnika u korupcijske afere.5 Najčešći razlozi manje izloženosti
korumpiranosti ovih društava nalaze se u tzv. "skandinavskoj čestitosti",
"protestantskoj etici“ ili pak povjerenju u državne institucije zbog kojih su
građani ovih društava, npr., uvijek spremni plaćati poreze, čak iako se protive

5

U razvijenim zemaljama korupcija se najčešće veže za razne investicijske fondove, prikrivanje
poreskih obaveza, bankarske korumptivne mahinacije i spregu politike i businessa. U razne
korumptivne afere bili su upleteni i najviši političari, predsjednici stranaka ili premijeri u Španiji,
Njemačkoj, Japanu, Francuskoj i Italiji, poput F. Gonzaleza, Kohla, Hosokawe, Shiraca i Jupuea,
Berlusconija, pa do generalnog sekretara NATO-a Willy Claes-a i dr. Čak je i Majka Tereza bila
optuživana za neprimjerene donacije. Vid. Brioschi, C.A. (2007), Kratka povijest korupcije, MATE,
Zagreb.

48

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

njihovim povećanjima.6 U isto vrijeme, u zemljama u razvoju (gdje korupcija
godišnje odnese izmedu 1-1,5 % nacionalnog dohotka) i tranzicijskim
urušenim društvima korupcija je postala sastavni dio općeg društvenog
stanja, redovna «sistemska bolest», proistekla iz manjkavosti institucionalnog
uređenja, pri čemu ne treba smetnuti s uma ni kulturno-povijesni okvir
društva u kome je moguća ova „sistemska greška“. Na razini opće pojavnosti
najčešće se, ipak, govori o korupciji kao izrazu vladavine korumpirane
politike.
Uobičajeno, rasprave o korupciji polaze od aksiomatske štetnosti
fenomena korupcije (ugrožavanje socijalnog i ekonomskog razvoja, lična
korist na štetu javnog interesa, devalviranje vrijednosnih kriterija u društvu i
sl.). Međutim, nasuprot čak i kvantificirane argumentacije da se korumpirana
društva sporije razvijaju od nekorumpiranih7, postoje slučajevi korumpiranih
zemalja sa visokim stopama ekonomskog rasta.
Zemlje u tranziciji su posebno osjetljive na korupciju zbog toga što
prolaze kroz fazu institucionalnog restrukturiranja, kada dolazi do bitnih
izmjena u pravilima koja određuju ponašanje ekonomskih i političkih aktera.
U pitanju je neminovni «inicijalni transformacioni šok» koji, po pravilu,
nastaje u uslovima naglog napuštanja predhodnog društvenog sistema prije
nego su izgrađene i prihvaćene instucije (socijalno-pravne, ekonomske)
novog društvenog sistema. Poseban slučaj ove grupacije zemalja su zemlje
Zapadnog Balkana, koje u kontekstu razmatranja korupcije svrstavamo u
urušena tranzicijska društva. Kod slučaja ovih zemalja, mnogi autori ukazuju
na „podložnost fenomenu korupcije“, što se očituju kroz nerazvijene
institucionalne kapacitete za provođenje zakona i neizgrađenu demokratsku
kulturu u društvu – odnosno prisutnu protodemokratiju, a što smo i podveli
pod sintagmu sistem(at)ske korupcije.8
Ovakva situacija enormno podstiče i stvara široke mogućnosti za
korupciju. Kada javne institucije ne funkcionišu prema jasnim i
transparentnim pravilima i mehanizmima koji garantuju pozivanje na
6

Izvještaj o korupciji za 2010, Transparency International, prema: www.dw.de/koja-zemlja-jenajkorumpiranija-na-svijetu/a-6220568.
7
Mauro, P. (1995), Corruption and Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110,
August.
8
Vid.: Hodžić, K., Vukadinović, S. (2004), Korupcija kao sistem(at)ski projekat u urušenim
tranzicijskim društvima (case study – Bosna i Hercegovina i Crna Gora), „Tranzicija“, Vol. VI, No 15.

49

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

odgovornost javnosti, lako mogu postati korumpirane i korištene za privatne
potrebe. A jačanje institucija u tranzicijskim zemljama je osnovni preduslov
suzbijanja korupcije. Budući da je korupcija u zemljama koje nastoje ostvariti
društveni preobražaj veoma kompletan, opasan i raširen fenomen neophodno
je formirati u državi, društvu i regionu široki antikorupcijski front.
Koordinaranu aktivnost u antikorupcijskom frontu moraju ostvariti institucije
države, kao i nevladinog i civilnog sektora. Za borbu protiv korupcije
neophodno je, uz to, znati kako dolazi do nje i gdje se i u kojim sektorima
društva ona dešava. Od pomenutih saznanja zavisi i uspješno postavljena
dijagnoza u liječenju društva od korupcije.
„Balkanskom društvu“ je, uz tranziciono sistem(at)sku imanentnost
pojave korupcije, socijalnopovijesno „ugrađena“ još i sklonost grabežljivog
mentaliteta, koja je u opusu jednog autora označena kao „sindrom kraljevića
Marka“.9 U balkanskim, urušenim tranzicijskim društvima, kakva su
bosansko-hercegovačko, srbijansko i crnogorsko društvo, pitanje korupcije je
povezano i u sprezi je sa organizovanim kriminalom, koji prelazi granice
država, pa problem ima i regionalnu dimenziju (N. Mappes-Niedik, npr.
govori o «balkanskoj mafiji»)10. Nijedno od tri pomenuta društva, kao ni
većina ostalih u ambijentu Zapadne Evrope (hrvatsko, makedonsko i
albansko) ne mogu sama rješavati ovaj problem. Neophodna je pomoć
međunarodnih institucija, prije svega, Savjeta Evrope koji će pomoći
izgradnju normativne infrastrukture u cilju suzbijanja korupcije, odnosno,
poslije toga, što je mnogo bitnije pratiti implementaciju zakona kroz pružanje
podrške u jačanju kapaciteta organa policije i pravosuđa, kao i lokalnih
organa i institucija u pravcu borbe protiv korupcije i organizovanog
kriminala. Pojave korupcije je veoma teško ispitati, pa pravnici imaju teškoće
u dokazivanju krivičnih djela korupcije. Na kraju ovog uvodnog dijela, kako
je i najavljeno njegovim naslovom, uputno je postaviti i pitanje budućnosti
korupcije („kuda ide korupcija?“). Utvrđivanje postojanja i određivanje
razine korumpiranosti društva je ozbiljan problem, a objektivni alati ili
mehanizmi nekog ranog upozaravanja ili etičkog spriječavanja gotovo da nisu
mogući kao referentni kriterijumi. Ako je parlamentana demokracija
nepobitno najviše civilizacijsko dostignuće političke vladavine, budućnost
prilika za korupcija je sasvim izvjesno potpuno otvorena: prema Prezzolini-u
9

Rendić-Miočević, I. (1996), Zlo velike jetre, povijest i nepovijest Crnogoraca, Hrvata, Muslimana i
Srba, Književni krug, Split.
10
Mappes-Niedik, N. (2003), Balkanska mafija, Durieux, Zagreb.

50

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

(1993) „demokracija je oblik vladanja koji se najlakše može korumptirati i
pogotovo parlamentarna vrsta stvara priliku i napast za zastupnike da se
okoriste javnim novcem, ili izravno za sebe i za svoje obitelji, ili posredno da
bi kupili poneke odrede birača ili u svojem gradu ili u određenoj klasi.“11
Nemogućnost određivanja egzaktnih relevantnih kriterija otkrivanje
korupcije premošćava se ispitivanjem percepcije i stavova građana o
postojanju korupcije. Takvo ispitivanje daje rezultate koji se ne smiju uzeti
kao potpuno pouzdano, ali mogu dosta realno ukazati na egzistiranje i postojanje korupcije.

1. Proces ekonomske tranzicije i korupcija
Uspostavljanje demokratskog društva, vladavine prava i tržišne
privrede u tranzicijskim zemljama otežava i usložnjava pojava koja je
povezana sa kriminalom i koja je u suprotnosti sa temeljnim društvenim i
civilizacijskim principima. Virus korupcije u ovim je zemljama naveliko
zahvatio javni sektor tako da ova pojava ima sistem(at)ski karakter.
U uslovima naglog napuštanja predhodnog društvenog sistema prije
nego su izgrađene i prihvaćene instucije novog društvenog sistema, nastaje
vakuum u kome s jedne strane, vlada zbrka moralnih vrijednosti, a s druge,
biva uspostavljena «mješavina politike i zločina», u kome korupcija postaje
«mirnodopski zločin»,12 a političari nova klasa finansijskih akumulatora.
Moral i politika su u krajnjoj dihotomiji, a tkivo države i društvenih
institucija značajno okrnjeni, na čemu i zasnivamo tezu o urušenim
društvima.
Ovako izraženi neuspjeh u sprovođenju tranzicije kod jednog broja
postkomunističkih zemalja, na čijoj neizgrađenoj osnovi se i otvara prostor za
sistemsku korupciju, kritičari pripisuju «nametnutoj» i «jednostarnoj i brzoj
primjeni ekonomskog liberalizma». Forsiranjem stabilizacije i kratkoročnih
razvojnih efekata, te gotovo isključivo forsiranom kvantitativnom stranom
brze vlasničke transformacije, nastanak i razvoj kapitalizma u ovim zemljama
i nije mogao a da ne bude «brz, nezreo... i problematičan.»13 On je rezultat
11

Nav. prema: Brioschi, C.A., op. cit., str. 182.
Mappes-Niediek, op. isto.
13
IDS Bulletin (1998), str. 10.
12

51

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

primjene neoliberalnog modela održivog rasta, kakav je Vašingtonskim
konsenzusom, instaliran u ekonomske politike postkomunističkih zemalja.14
Tržišna ekonomija, međutim, zahtijeva adekvatne institucionalne
strukture, «adaptivnu efikasnost» ekonomskih subjekata i privatnu svojinu u
konkurentnom miljeu, pa tranzicija može biti provedena jedino postupnos,
budući da su to složeni i dugi procesi zasnovani na potpuno novoj
organizaciji, novim zakonima, promjeni ponašanja raznih ekonomskih
subjekata." To daje za pravo Stiglitzovim analizama po kojima neoliberalni
model zapostavlja upute neoklasične teorije prema kojoj su za funkciniranje
tržišne privrede (u smislu Pareto efikasnosti) jednako neophodni
konkurencija i privatno vlasništvo. Shock-terapijski model privatizacije je
lako izvodIjiv, ali takva privatizacija ne doprinosi stvaranju tržišne privrede.
«Zbilja, ako se privatizacija provodi na manje-više nelegitimne načine i u
okruženju koje ne raspolaže neophodnom institucionalnom infrastrukturom,
to može da dovede u pitanje dugoročne izglede za izgradnju tržišne privrede.
Što je još gore, tako stvoreni interesi privatnog vlasništva doprinose
slabljenju države i podrivanju društvenog poretka kroz korupciju i
zapetljavanje u regultivu.»15
Rasturanje postsocijalističke države bazirano je na pretpostavkama o
komunističkim institucijama kao "zločastim" i "nepravljivo korumpiranim" u
procesu tranzicije, zbog čega ih treba brzo zamjeniti sa tržišnim institucijama
koje će same po sebi doći sa privatiziranom svojinom. Naime, iskustva
drugih postkomunističkih zemalja pokazuju da početna uloga države u
procesu prelaza na tržišnu privredu mora biti naglašena. Ovo je potvrđeno
pravilo bez obzira o kom se konceptu ekonomske uloge države radi. U
uvjetima slabe ili nefunkcionalne pravne države, „korupcija postaje – ono što
je paradoks – jedan od regulatora društvenog i ekonomskog sistema.“16
Naime, i neoliberalni i aktivistički (državno-intervencionistički) koncept
strategije tranzicije zahtjeva "jaku (demokratsku) državu". "Jaka država" je,
prvo, neophodna radi nesmetanog funkcionisanja tržišnog mehanizma i
njegovih osnovnih institucija, prije svega zaštite svojine i ugovora.
14

Hodžić, K. (2004), (Re)privatizacija i globalizacija, „Forum Bosnae“, Sarajevo, str. 469.
Stiglitz, J. (1999), Reform? Ten Years of the Postsociakist Transition, The World Bank, Washington
D.C.
16
Vuković, S. (2003), Korupcija i vladavina prava, Beograd: IDN – Draganić, str. 172.
15

52

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

Velikom zabludom su se pokazala očekivanja da će tržišne ustanove
nastati same od sebe sa definisanim vlasničkim pravima. Liberalni
reformatori su bili uvjereni da će institucije slijediti privatno vlasništvo, te da
će prema Coaseovoj teoriji (1937) brzo doći do preraspodjele svojine, u kojoj
će ona pripasti efikasnim preduzetnicima. Za kritičare neoklasičnih recepata
(Stiglitz, 1999; Kolodko, 2000.) vrijedi obrnut proces: privatno vlasništvo
slijedi institucijama, odnosno za stvaranje tržišta u tranzicijskim zemljama
institucionalno uređenje je najvažniji faktor prema stalnom ekonomskom
rastu. Neoklasični ekonomisti, tumače ovi kritičari, naprosto ne razumiju
institucionalne zahtjeve validne za stvaranje tržišta, budući da ih
"jednostavno uzimaju za gotovu činjenicu". Već nakon deset godina
tranzicije pokazalo se da su kritičari u pravu: Coaseovi argumenti nisu validni
zbog toga što, s jedne strane, nije postajalo stvamo primarno i sekundarno
tržište - "tako da se imovina više pljačkala nego što se ponovo prodavala," a s
druge, što za održivost nije bitno samo da prava vlasništva budu jasno
definirana, već i na koji način su ona definirana.
Početak i sprovođenje procesa tranzicije u Bosni i Hercegovini, Srbiji
i Crnoj Gori odlikuje se najdubljom tranzicionom krizom u jugoistočnoj
Evropi. Ovi procese su praćeni snažnom socijalnom diferencijacijom i naglim
siromašenjem većeg dijela stanovništva. Uz to, Bosna i Hercegovina je, s
jedne strane, doživjela i fizičku, biološku i supstancijalnu dekonstrukciju
društva izazvanu strašnim ratnim razaranjima. Pratilac društvenih gibanja
socijalnog diferenciranja, pauperizacije i dekonstrukcije je i enormno
bogaćenje manjeg broja pojedinaca. Sticanje bogatstva «preko noći» najčešće
je povezano sa korupcijom kao pratećom negativnom pojavom tranzicije. Ali,
na korupciju, kao što je naglašeno, nije imuno ni jedno društvo, pa čak ni ona
koja su davno i veoma uspješno izvela tranziciju. Samo s tom razlikom što se
u urušenim tranzicijskim društvima korupcija razvija tolikom brzinom i
intenzitetom da ozbiljno nagriza i napada društveno tkivo kao kakav
kancerogeni supstrat, dok je ta pojava u razvijenim društvima stavljena pod
kontrolu institucija. Pojava i razmjere korupcije prijete da postanu jedan od
najozbiljnijih problema sa kojim se ova društva i države Zapadnog Balkana
suočavaju.
Proces tranzicije, dakle, čini onaj locus standi korupcije, čiji se izvori,

53

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

prema sistematiziranom pristupu strukturiraju na:17










Institucionalnu neizgrađenost u čijem vakumu vladajuće stranke
„zarobljavaju državu“, što podstiče i razvija pometnju u pogledu
moralnih vrijednosti i ponašanja, u kojima korupcija postaje
uobičajeni «način života»;
Državnu kontrolu ekonomskih tokova;
Siromaštvo društvo, koje «pogoduje diskreditovanju profesionalne
etike i podstiče nelegalno sticanje materijalne koristi radi poboljšanja
materijalnog položaja učesnika u korupcionom odnosu»;
Nepripremljenu privatizaciju (putem pranja novca, kršenja zakonske
procedure u procesu privatizacije, korumpiranosti javnih službenika
uključenih u sam čin privatizacije);
Rasprostranju toleranciju na korupciju među građanima u smislu
slogana «svaka je vlada korumpirana» i uobičajenim «zahvalnostima»
pojedincima u specifičnim djelatnostima (npr, ljekarima,
nastavnicima, šalterskim službenicima i sl.).
Pojavu nove klase tajkuna regrutovani iz redova pripadnika bivšeg
režima i ratnih profitera;
Ratno razaranje društva, koje omogućava pljačku i ratno profiterstvo,
te konsolidaciju organizovanog kriminala (redovna pojava dovođenja
kriminalaca u državne službe).

Dakle, brzi raspadi totalitarnih režima prema učešću države u
privredi, stvorili su pravni i institucionalni vakuum, duže nego što se to
očekivalo, pa je korupcija je prirodna posljedica kombinacije načina na koji
se provodi tranzicija uopšte (više puta argumentovana teza J. Stiglitza, 1998,
1999, 2002).
U institucionalno nesređenim društvima, korupcija se najviše vezuje
za tzv. političku korupciju i, s njom povezane malverzacije i propuste u
procesu privatizacije. Zloupotrebe tokom privatizacije (u literaturi označene
kao privatizacija nomenklature ili tunelisanje) podsjećaju na najgore oblike
prvobitne akumulacije kapitala. Štaviše, isprepletanost novih političkih elita i
skorojevićke finansijske mafije je više nego vidna. Gotovo da nema
17

Zbornik radova Korupcija u odsustvu prava. Ogledi iz Bosne i Hercegovine, Hrvatske, Srbije i Crne
Gore (2004), Fondacija Henrich Bell, Sarajevo (prilozi Z. Golubović, S Kukića, N. Mapes-Niedika).

54

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

tranzicijske zemlje u čijoj privatizaciji nije bilo pojava korupcije i raznih
oblika malverzacija uopće. Proces privatizacije redovno je praćen većim ili
manjim aferama na osnovu čega se često izvlačio zaključak kako je posrijedi
pljačka državne/društvene imovine u korist jednog uskog broja ljudi koji su,
bilo sumnjivim finansijskim transakcijama, bilo novom političkom podobnošću došli u posjed znatnog dijela dojučerašnje državne/društvene imovine.

2. Ekonomski izvori sistem(at)ske korupcije u Bosni i
Hercegovini, Srbiji i Crnoj Gori
Fokusiranje na stanje u Bosni i Hercegovina, Srbiji i Crnoj Gori
pokazuje da je korupcija ne ekcesno stanje, nego pravilo sa kvalifikacijama
"sistem(at)ske bolesti", čiji se uzroci mogu tražiti i u institucionalnim i povijesno-kulturološkim činjenicama. Dok u Bosni i Hercegovini ovi izvori leže u
novom (dejtonskom) etnički razdjeljenom ustrojstvu državne zajednice i
njenom ekonomski
neoliberalnom funkcioniranju, u kome političko
nacionalne elite svoju korumpiranost pokrivaju divergentnim vizijama o
Bosni i Hercegovini, u Srbiji se korupcija veže za jednonacionalnu „partijsku
državu“ i državnu regulaciju, a u Crnoj Gori korupcija proizilazi iz
tradicionalističkog, homogenog društva, karakterističnog po političkom
uvezivanju obiteljskih klanova i posebne crnogorsko arhaične institucije
kumstva. Ostatak regiona Zapadnog Balkana (Albanija, Kosovo), bez obzira
na izvjesne napretke, ima još veću podložnost korupciji: Kosovo je
permanentno izloženo snažnoj korupcije, nepotizmu i kršenju ljudskih prava
zbog slabosti vlasti (nedjelotvornog pravosuđa i uske povezanosti s vlasti s
privatnim preduzećima)18, a u Albaniji kritičari govore o "kulturi bezakonja"
u zemlji. Pokazatelji korupcije (u čitavoj zadnjoj deceniji), po mjerenju
percepcije građana od strane Transparency International, za Kosovo i
Albanija imaju i najniže vrijednosti (najviše razine korupcije) u regionu,
mada je u jednom ranijem istraživanju (2000.) korupcije bila najviše raširena
u Rumuniji.19
Iako derivaju iz različitih institucionalnih i povijesno¬-kulturoloških
karakteristika svojih društava, obim i raširenost korupcije su slični, a faktori

18

Izvješće Američke privredne komore na Kosovu, dnevnik.hr/.../korupcija-na-kosovu-poprimazabrinjavajuce-razmjere.ht.
19
Vid. Corruption Index (2001), Colalition 2000, Sofia.

55

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

koji zaprečavaju razvoj i održivosti svih ovih zemalja ujedno su i faktori koji
pogoduju pojavi i širenju korupcije.
Postratna ekonomija Bosna i Hercegovina, programirana u obliku
tranzicionog paketa, formirana je dvodimenzionalno: s jedne strane, po
osnovu neoliberalne ideologije svjetskog tržišta, a s druge, odredbama
Daytonskog sporazuma. Za Bosnu i Hercegovinu, zemlju "specifičnih
specifičnosti", međutim, ovakav paket kombinovan sa generalnom
makroekonomskom i političkom nestabilnošeu ne samo da teško može
ostvariti ambijent za ekonomski razvoj, već se i samo njeno održavanje čini
delikatnim i gotovo neriješivim problemom, naravno ako se prepusti
"svojim" etnonacionalnim strategijama.20 Prenošenje fiskalnog suverenititeta
na dva entiteta i DC Brčko pogoduje nedodirljivosti akterima korupcije,
budući da se „korumpiranosti pojedinih visokih činovnika i političara još
uvijek u velikoj mjeri tumači kao napad na „nacionalni integritet i identitet
cijele etničke grupe“21 (bosanskohercegovački fenomen etničke korupcije).
U takvim uslovima Bosna i Hercegovina je uvućena u svojevrsno
ambivalentno stanje, u kome je bosansko-hercegovačko društvo izgubilo
svoju unutrašnju sposobnosti za samo-održivost, a koje je svoju budućnost
vezalo za isključivo za "vanjske poticaje." Ovim je stvorena slaba država,
koja neizgrađenom političkom kulturom za transparentni servis građana i
poduzetničko društvo naprosto podstiče formiranje i održavanje pararelnih
struktura koje imaju stvarnu moć, i vrše organizovani kriminal i korupciju.
Dayton je od Bosne i Hercegovine napravio labavu uniju, koja nema
mogućnosti za makrockonomsko vođenje svoje privrede a realizuje etničke
privatizacije. Kao kvazi državne institucije, entiteti su dovoljno jaki da
dovode u pitanje funkcionisanje Bosne i Hercegovine kao cijeline, ali i toliko
slabi da ne mogu obezbjediti niti fukcionisanje tržišnog mehanizma niti
spriječiti korumpiranost svojih kvazidržavnih aparata. Sve to, zapravo, govori
da je nastao pravi vakuum u pogledu političkih i ekonomskih funkcija države,
a da, usto, nisu stvorene demokratske institucije i mehanizmi tržišnog
sistema. Npr. novi krivični zakon Bosne i Hercegovije predviđa mogućnost
konfiskovanja nelegalno stečene imovine a nedavno usvojeni zakon o
krivičnom postupku daje veća ovlaštenja javnim tužiocima, a istražnim
20

Stojanov, D. (1999), The elements of alternative development stragies for transition economies,
„Tranzicija“, Vol 1, No 2-3.
21
Vid. Korupcija u BiH – Analiza stanja, Opservatorij ljudskih prava u BiH,
www.ljudskaprava.ba/korupcija-u-bih-analiza-stanja.

56

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

organima mogućnost snimanja i pretresa. No nije stvar u zakonima nego u
tome što se oni ne primjenjuju, jer nema političke volje.
U
srbijanskom
slučaju najčešće se ukazuje na „partijsku državu kao uzrok korupcije“ i
„ulogu partija u zarobljavanju države“ u kojoj se korupcija razvijala i
opstajala „kao sistemska pojava i oblik svakodnevnog života“, a koja je
„metastazirala urezavši se u odlike mentaliteta.“ U ovakvim okolnostima čak
je i „državna revizija postala predmet partijskih nagodbi.“22 Za razliku od
bosanskohercegovačke otvorenosti za korupciju u uvjetima sveprisutnog
ekonomskog neoliberalizma, srbijanska otvorenost za korupciju veže se za
pretjerani ekonomski intervencionizam kojeg karakteriziraju relacije
partijskog upravljanja javnim preduzećima, zatim za privatizacijske postupke,
te za značajnu spregu državnih struktura sa medijima ili novinskim
agencijama, bilo putem učešća u njihovom vlasništvu, bilo ogromnim
državnim donacijama medijima (državne donacije medijima na republičkom i
lokalnom nivou se procjenjuju na cca 40 miliona €).23 Prošlogodišnja
percepcija korupcije upravo je fokusirala velike javne ali i privatne
kompanije kao „važne karike u lancu korupcije“: preko 70% građana smatra
da je u interesu velikih kompanija da imaju korumpiranu vladu, kako bi
realizovali sopstvene interese, dok se mala i srednja preduzeća ne vide kao
sektor na koji korupcija ima veoma negativan uticaj,24 iako neka druga
istraživanja ukazuju i na „sitnu korupciju“, koja za mala preduzeća označava
plaćanje mita za razne dozvole ili „ulazak u posao“ s javnim sektorom. Od
faktora koji potpomažu korupciju u Srbiji najčešće se skreće pažnja na proces
privatizacije u čim je „svim fazama korupcija evidentna“, i to od modeliranja
privatizacionih postupaka, slabosti zakonskih postupaka i nekompetetnosti
Trgovinskih sudova, nekompetentnih Ministarstva za finansije i privatizaciju,
Agencije za privatizaciju, izbora nekompetetnih privatizacionih savjetnika,
preko javnih tendera i samog čina prodaje, pa do prevladavanja nekoliko
poznatih tajkuna u kupovinama javnih preduzeća.25
Vrijedan naučnog interesa je pregled tipova korupcije u Srbiji, u
najvećoj mjeri svojstven i za ostala urušena tranzicijska društva na Zapadnom
22

Vid. Krstić, O. (2009), Neki uzroci korupcije u Republici Srbiji, Zbornik radova „Korupcija i pranje
novca“, Internacionalna asocijacija kriminalista Banja Luka, Sarajevo, str. 205 i 207.
23
Vid. Gamser, G. (2012), Korupcija u Srbiji za 2012. godinu, Centar za evroatlanske studije,
dostupno na: ceas-serbia.org/.../75-korupcija-u-srbiji-2012-godina.
24
Izveštaj pripremljen za UNDP Srbija, Percepcija korupcije na nivou domaćinstva. Peti talas,
Jun 2012. , www.undp.org.rs/index.cfm?event=public
25
Skakavac, Z, Skakavac, T. (2013), Korupcija u vezi sa privatizacijom preduzeća – situacija u
Republici Srbiji, Zbornik radova, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta „Vitez“, Vitez, str. 244-245.

57

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

Balkanu, koji Vuković specificira na slijedeći način:26 prvi tip korupcije
odnosi se na dodatno plaćanje javnom službeniku za ostvarivanje prava ili
njegovo ubrzavanje (npr. dobijanje ugovora s vladom ili javnim sektorom –
javne nabavke, lokacije za gradnju, dozvole za izvoz ili uvoz, zapošljavanje u
javnom sektoru i sl,); drugi je podmićivanje uz kršenje prava, tj. sticanje
prava koja koruptoru ne sljeduju po zakonu (vršilac vlasti ili javni skužbenik
namješta tender, izdaje razne dozvole, namješta invladiske penzije ili
koruptoru „gleda kroz prste“, i treći tip uključuje podmićivanje radi
mjenjanja zakona, odn. njegovo prilagođavanje intresima koruptora.
Crnogorski «slučaj» korupcije je znatno skriveniji, budući da se radi o
jedinstvenom i svemoćnom sistemu jakih obitelji, plemenskih prijateljstava i
kumova, koji stoje iznad pisanog zakona i autoriteta državnih institucija, što
se najbolje manifestira u fenomenu „pretjeranog nipotizma“. U takvom
«sistemu» su bliskost i pripadnost klanu mnogo važnije sredstvo
podmićivanja nego novac27. Korupciji u Crnoj Gori, uz to, pogoduju
mnogobrojna off-shore kompanije, karakteristične po pranju novca u
svjetskim razmjerama, kao i državno potpomagani šverc cigaretama, te
postojeći sistem javnih nabavki.28 Crnogorska kritička misao ukazuje na
odsustvo „političke volje za istinsku borbu protiv korupcije“, što je
principijelno rečeno opća karakteristika za sve tri ove zemlje, mada je u
periodu 2009-2011. (vid. tabelu 1), percepcija građana na korupciju imala
trend naglašenog poboljšanja.
U slijedećem izlaganju prezentiramo ocjenu korupcije koju daje
Transparency International (Indikator percepcije korupcije - CPI) u zemljama
Zapadnog Balkana, dodajući i Sloveniju. Zahvaćen je period od 2002. do
2011, dok je ocjena za 2012. godinu, s obzirom na novu metodologiju
izračuvanja CPI-a i neuporedivost novog indikatora sa ocjenama predhodnih
godina, posebno prezentirana.

26

Vuković, S. (2003), op. isto, str. 169-176.
Mappes-Nordiek, N., op. isto, str. 61.
28
Vukadinović, S., Medojević, N., Đeković, D. (2003), Korupcija i transparetnost na lokalnom nivou u
Crnoj Gori, Agencija za lokalnu demokratiju, Nikšić.
27

58

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

Tabela 1. Indeks percepcije korupcije (CPI) u zemljama Regije 2007-2011
Zemlja

Slovenija
Hrvatska
BJR
Makedonija
Crna Gora
Srbija
BiH
Albanija
Kosovo

Indeks percepcije korupcije (CPI)
2002
2007
2008
2009

2010

6,7
4,4
3,6

6,6
4,1
3,3

6,7
4,4
3,6

6,6
4,1
3,8

6,4
4,1
4,1

1
5,9
4,0
3,9

3,4
3,4
3,2
3,4
-

3,3
3,4
2,9
2,9
-

3,4
3,4
3,3
3,4
-

3,9
3,5
3,0
3,2
-

3,7
3,5
3,2
3,3
2,8

4,0
3,3
3,2
3,1
2,9

Poredak
2011
(među
zemlje)

201

u
182

35
66
69
65
86
91
95
112

Izvor: Transparency International (2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2002). "Corruption Perceptions
Index".
Napomena: Skala percepcije korupcije od 0 do 10 (0 = apsolutna korupcija, 10 = bez korupcije)

Tabela 2. Globalni Indeks percepcije korupcije (CPI) za 2012. godinu
Zemlja

Poredak
2012.
(među
zemlje)

u
176

CPI

(Globalni indeks
percepcije
korupcije)

CI Lower

(Donji
indeks
percepcije
korupcije)

Zemlje koje se percipiraju kao najmanje korumpirane
Danska
1
90
87
Finska
1
90
85
Novi Zeland
1
90
87
Zemlje JIE
Slovenija
37
61
55
Hrvatska
62
46
41
BJR Makedonija 69
43
35
BiH
38
72
42
Crna Gora
34
75
41
Srbija
35
80
39
Kosovo
105
34
32
Albanija
113
33
30
Zemlje koje se percipiraju kao najviše korumpirane
Avganistan
176
8
2
Sjeverna Koreja
176
8
2
Somalija
176
8
4

CP Upper

(Gornji
percepcije
korupcije)

indeks

93
95
94
67
51
51
46
49
44
37
36
13
13
12

Izvor: Transparency International (2012). "Corruption Perceptions Index 2012: In detail"
Napomena: Skala percepcije korupcije od 0 do 100 (0 = apsolutna korupcija, 100 = bez korupcije)

59

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

Prema Izvještaju globalnog indeksa percepcije korupcije (CPI) za
2012. godinu najviša mjesta među zemljama Zapadnog Balkana zauzele su
Hrvatska (62 mjesto od ukupno 176 zemalja) i Makedonija (69 mjesto).
Slijede Bosna i Hercegovina (72 mjesto), Crna Gora (75 mjesto) i Srbija (80
mjesto), a na začelju su Kosovo (105 mjesto) i Albanija (113 mjesto). U
odnosu na predhodnu godinu, korupcija u 2012. godini je blago umanjena u
Hrvatskoj i Bosni i Hercegovini, u Makedoniji ostala ista, dok su Srbija,
Crna Gora, Kosovo i Albanija nazadovale. Pri tumačenju CPI, ipak, treba
imati izvjesnu rezervu s obzirom da se radi o subjektivnoj percepciji
građana (koja se u izvjesnim situacijama kritički zaoštrava, poput onih u
vrijeme intenzivnijih privatizacija ili naglih otkrića korupcijskih afera
političara) pa i različitim (od 2012.) metodologijama. Tako je, npr. Bosna u
Hercegovina u godinama prije 2012. nazadovala, a Albanija i Makedonija
pokazivale pozitivan trend smanjenja razine korupcije, da bi se u 2012.
situacija promjenila tako što je Bosna i Hercegovina uznapredovala čak za
19 mjesta, Makedonija stagnirala, a Albanija nazadovala.
Dakle, nedvojbena je široka rasprostranjenost korupcije u svim
zemljama Zapadnog Balkana. To potvrđuju i drugi izvori istraživanja29,
fokusirani na percepciju menadžera o korupciji. Na razini regionalnog
prosjeka, istraživanje pokazuje da 42,2% menadžera smatraju da je
korupcija „ogromna ili važna prepreka poslovanju u regiji“ (unutar ovog
prosjeka, mišljenja menadžera po zemljama značajno variraju, i to od 86,8%
na Kosovu do 23,6% u BiH i 24% u Crnoj Gori). Rezultati ovog
istraživanja, također, pokazuju da je korupcija manje prisutna u slučaju
velikih (preko 250 zaposlenih)30 i mikro poduzeća (do 10 zaposlenih), te
menadžera preko 40 godina starosti. Korupcijom su više opterečeni mlađi
menadžeri i mala i srednja poduzeća (između 11 i 250 zaposlenika). Isto
tako, korupcijom su najviše pogođene djelatnost građevinarstvo (52,6%) i
prijevoz, skladištenje i veze (44,3%).
Posmatrano kroz regionalni prosjek u posljednjoj deceniji,
zajedničko obilježje zemalja Zapadnog Balkana je izvjesna stagnacija u
borbi protiv korupcije, što s jedne strane, upućuje na zaostajanje razvoja
29

Podumljak, M. (2010), Percepcija i stavovi o korupciji na Zapadnom Balkanu – regionalni pregled,
str. 18. www.integrityobservers.eu/default.aspx?id=10
30
Od ovakve percepcije odsupa stav građana u Srbiji da su velika preduzeća u visokoj korumptivnoj
vezi sa državnim tijelima.

60

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

(korupcija je u negativnoj korelaciji sa ekonomskim rastom),
ugrožavanje makroekonomske, političke i socijalne stabilnosti, te
destimuliranje pristizanja investicija, a s druge, na izvjestan neuspjeh
provođenje antikorupcijskih programa u ovim zemljama.

3.
Oblasti u kojima je rasprostanjena korupcija u Bosni i
Hercegovini
U istraživanjima o korupciji posebno se naglašavaju oblasti
društvenog angažmana koje pogoduju pojavana korupcije. Pogodan ambijent
po oblastima za korupciju stvara mogućnost za njene uplive i proširivanje i u
najmanje strukturne pore društvene strukture. Treba takođe imati u vidu da s
obzirom na specifičnosti istraživanja korupcije ambijent lokalne zajednice
jednog društva, kao i njegova cjclina imaju, ponekad, različite percepcije
gradjana o oblastima pogodnim za korupciju po opštinama u odnosu na
državne relatite Bosne i Hercegovine. Medutim, pomaci i mimoilaženja na
hijerahiji oblasti koje su podložne korupciji nisu ispoljene u nekom
značajnijem omjeru općeg trenda.
Prije deceniju, Transparency International BiH (2002) je došao do
zaključka da je „jedan od najizraženijih vidova korupcije u BiH izbjegavanje
obaveza prema državi», što se ispoljava preko: izbjegavanja plaćanja carina,
evaziju poreza i akciza i podmićivanje inspektora, čime su se javni prihodi
BiH smanjivali za jednu trećinu.31 Deset godina kasnije (2011), prema
podacima Otvorene Mreže BiH najviše korupcije je zabilježeno u državnom
vrhu, policiji i carini, a slijede zdravstvo i obrazovanje.
U Studiji percepcija korupcije u BiH, 2002., metodologija
kvalificiranja odgovora građana uspostavila je ocjene od 1 do 5, koje
podrazumjevaju: 1) veoma malo, 2) malo, 3) osrednje, 4) mnogo i 5) veoma
mnogo korupcije. Tadašnja percepcija korupcije označila je slijedeće oblasti
koje najviše pogoduju korupciji:32
a) u Federaciji BiH: političke stranke (3,97), Skupština FBiH (3,90),
pravosuđe (3,85), carina (3,85), Vlada FBiH (3,85) i kantonalne
31

Transparency International BiH (2002), Studiji percepcija korupcije BiH, Banja Luka/Sarajevo, str.
71.
32
Transparency International BiH, op. isto, str. 35-37.

61

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

uprave (3,85).
b) u Republici Srpskoj: carina (4,39), političke stranke (4,29), poreska
uprava (4,11), državna preduzeća (4,08), općinska uprava (4,05),
Vlada RS (4,03), Narodna skupština (4,01), policija (4,01) i
pravosude (4,00).
Iako je postojala izvjesna razlika u entitetima u percepciji nivoa
korupcije po pojedinim oblastima (u RS je percepcija građana o korupciji bila
veća i glasila je na prosječnu ocjenu 3,81, dok je u FBiH iznosila 3,55), ova
ispitivanja u oba entiteta potvrduje pretpostavku da je korupcija u potpunosti
sistemski projekat, iako nema oblasti koje nisu zahvaćene korupcijom (sve
oblasti društvenog života imale su ocjenu iznad 2; npr. najamnje zahveći
korupcijom u FBiH su: međunarodne organizacije (2,66), nevladine
organizacije (2,69) i školstvo (2,82), a u RS: vojska (2,86), školstvo (2,93) i
nevladine organizacije (3,13).
Pregled trendova korupcije u predhodnoj deceniji (2002-2012)
pokazuje da se oblasti u kojima građani najčešće percipiraju korupcija
uglavnom zadržavaju na razini visokog intenziteta (u segmente društva koje
građani smatraju najkorumpiranijim spadaju političke stranke, zakonodavna
vlast, pravosuđe, poreske obaveze, a njima se u posljednjim godinama
pridružuju obrazovanje i javne nabavke.33
U Izvještaju o istraživanju percepcije korupcije u BiH, 201134,
potvrđeno je visokointenzivno prisustvo korupcije u državnom vrhu i
političkim strankama, s tim što su oblastima visokog korumptivnog
intenziteta pridruženi zdravstvo i obrazovanje (vidjeti grafikon 1). Radi se o
do sada najobimnijem istraživanje percepcije korupcije u BiH, sa uzorkom od
3009 ispitanika. Uzorak osigurava kako geografsko-regionalnu
reprezentativnost (zastupljene sve tri administrativne cjeline: FBiH, RS i DC
Brčko), tako i reprezentativnost unutar ovih administrativnih cjelina.
Ispitanici su imali mogućnost izabrati tri od ponuđenih 14 odgovora.
33

Uporediti rezultate istraživanja Transparency International u godinama 2002-2012.
Izvještaj o istraživanju percepcije korupcije u Bosni i Hercegovini, Udruženje RADIO KAMELEON
– Otvorena mreža ljudskih prava i demokratije, projekat za Centre civilnih inicijativa u okviru projekta
‘’ MitoLovac’’, 2011.

34

62

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

Grafikon 1: Prisutnost korupcije u BiH po oblastima

Izvor: Izvještaj o istraživanju percepcije korupcije u BiH (2011), Udruženje Radio Kameleon Otvorena mreža ljudskih prava i demokratije, str. 20.

Kao i prije deset godina, u percepciji građana najkorumpiraniji je
državni vrh (41,5%). Redoslijed ostalih oblasti koje slijede, također manje
više odgovara percepciji o korupciji koja je bila prisutna i prije deset godina:
sudstvo (23,3%), općinske službe (22,6 %), političke stranke (18,4 %) i
inspekcije (17,7 %). Najmanje korupcije je prisutno u dobrotvornim
organizacijama, u oružanim snagam BiH, u nevladinim organizacijama i u
medijima. Percepcija o manjem prisustvu korupcije u ove potonje tri oblasti
odgovara stanju percepcije prije deset godina. Izuzetak je obrazovanje, koje
je u odnosu na predhodno stanje podignuto na razinu znatno povećane
korupcije.
Od konkretiziranih životnih situacija koje građani percipiraju kao
korumptivne (ispitanici su imali mogućnost odabira pet odgovora, uz
dodavanje dvije situacije po svom nahođenju) pojavljuju se najviše
zaposlenje (84,1 %) i upisi u škole ili fakultete (34,8 %). Slijede:
izbjegavanje kazne za saobraćajne prekršaje, oslobađanje krivice na sudu,
polaganje ispita na fakultetu, ulazak preko reda, kupovina glasova na
političkim izborima, izbor ljekara na operaciji i izbjegavanje optužnice.

63

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

Grafikon 2: Životne situacije u kojima je prisutna korupcija

Izvor: Izvještaj o istraživanju percepcije korupcije u BiH, op. isto, str. 21.

4. Parametri borbe protiv korupcije
U stereotipnim pristupima uspješnost borbe i budućnost korupcije
zavise u velikoj mjeri, što se i vidi iz stavova ispitanika u predhodno
prikazanim istraživanjima, ovisi od uspostavljanja valjanog zakonodavstva,
zatim razvoja institucija sistema, civilnog društva i edukacije. U slučaju
Bosne i Hercegovine, obično se upućuje na neophodne izmjene Izbornog
zakona i Zakona o finansiranju političkih partija, te poboljšavanje Zakona o
javnim nabavkama. Obično se ovom setu mjera dodaje i uloga medija budući
da mediji mogu imati moćnu ulogu u prokazivanju korumptivnih radnji, pa je
neophodno usklađivanje entitetskih zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama
s državnim zakonom, sa uvođenjem kazni za nepoštivanje zakona. U situaciji
kada je činjenično i na pravosudnim organima teško dokazati postojanje
korupcije jedna medijska kampanja na razotkrivanju i imenovanju nosilaca
korupcije može dati značajne rezultate. Slobodni mediji imaju podsticajnu
ulogu u ekonomskom razvoju, a posebno u borbi protiv siromaštva. Samim
64

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

tim takva aktivnost znači i manje korupcije budući da, ponekad, ocjena medija ima veću težinu neko osuda nekog političkog, državnog ili pravosudnog
organa.
Naravno, objašnjenje da se korupcija može suzbijati odgovarajućom
institucionalnom strukturom i zakonima, razvojem civilnog društva,
unapređenjem edukacije i većom usredsređenosti medija na javno žigosanje
pojava i aktera korupcije jeste globalni teorijski fokus na suzbijanje pojava
korupcije, ali ne i potpuni okvir za iskorjenjivanje kako normativnog javnog
prostora tako i korupcijskog mentaliteta u kojima nastaju i proširuju se
korupcijske pojave. Pogotovo što korupcija u nekim situacijama ne proizvodi
uvijek negativne efekte, što je slučaj onda kada loša ili kleptokratska državna
uprava nameće štetnu regulaciju i time postavlja prepreke normalnim
poslovnim transakcijama, pa je najbolji put za uklanjanje ne samo korupcije,
već i njenih štetnih efekata ukidanje loše i štetne regulacije.35
Elaboriranje paramatara borbe protiv korupcije se smješta u dva
suprostavljena teorijsko-ideološka okvira:
Prvi je intervencionistički, odnosi se na izraženu političku volju
političke i zakonodavne vlasti i odlučnost vlasti da se sistemski uhvati u
koštac sa izazovima korupcije, što u principu pretpostavlja „snažnu državu“.
Odsustvo „snažne države“ u ovom pristupu, koji je rasprostranjen među
analitičarima korupcije na Zapadnom Balkanu, uvijek podrazumijeva kršenje
zakona i nepostojanje procedura, a krajnjem ima za posljedicu korupcionaško
ponašanje državnih službenika.
Drugi je libertarijanistički, na Zapadnom Balkanu samo kroz opus
rijetkih pojedinaca prisutan pristup. Po svemu sudeći, vodeći libertarijanstički
ekonomist na ovom prostoru je Boris Begović,36 po kome se korupcija
analitički pozicionira na umanjivanje koristi od korupcije i uvećavanje
troškova za učesnike korupcionog posla. Korist od korupcije postoji u
uslovima kontraproduktivne državne intervencije odnosno nedostatka
konkurencije, u uslovima u kojima se stvara velika renta. U ovom pristiupu,
deregulacijom i liberalizacijom uklanja se korist od korupcije za koruptore.
35

Mijatović, B. (2007), Prikaz knjige: Boris Begović: Ekonomska analiza korupcije, CL DS (dostupno
na: www.clds.rs/newsite/aktivnosti_mediji_prikaz-korupcija.html ).

36

Begović, B., op. cit., str. 359 i dalje.

65

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

Povećanje troškova za učesnike korupcionih poslova znači povećanje
transakcionih troškova takvih poslova, kao i očekivane kazne za krivično
delo korupcije. Riješenost, to jest politička volja i dobri elementi strategije
otjelotvoreni u zdravim, liberalnim ekonomskim politikama, preduslovi su
djelotvorne borbe protiv korupcije. Ukoliko je to postignuto, konkretna
institucionalna odnosno organizaciona rješenja nisu od presudnog interesa –
različita riješenja mogu dobro da funkcionišu ukoliko su ispunjeni navedeni
preduslovi.
Dosadašnja pozitivna iskustva zemalja u borbe protiv korupcije
pokazuju da je strategija suzbijanja korupcije počivala na tri komplementarna
antikorupcijska nivoa:37
1) Dobro razvijene „situaciona preventiva“, odnosno ograničenja
mogućnosti za korupciju,
2) Povećanje represije protiv prestupnika,
3) Posvećenost naporu za promjenu kulturnih obrazaca u društvu.

ZAKLJUČAK
Korupcija duboko nagriza većinu životnih i radnih segmenata
urušenih tranzicijskih društva. Autoritativni režimi pod firmom
parlamentarne demokratije od početka tranzicionih procesa utiču na
stvaranje formalnih i neformalnih mreža pojavnosti fenomena korupcije na
svim nivoima organizovanja. Ovakve mreže su okrenute korupciji, odnosno
sticanju protivpravne koristi u najuže strukture državnog rukovođenja i
upravljanja na svim nivoima. Nedvojben je zaključak da su vladajući
politički establišmenti ovih zemalja obilježeni proto demokratijom, koja
podrazumjeva demokratiju kao nadmoć zakona, ali u uslovima normativne
krize bez demokratske ili političke strukture koja je može podržati
(međuovisni triangl: demokratija-ekonomski rast-korupcija).
U urušenim tranzicijskim društvima korupcija je pravilo sa
kvalifikacijama "sistem(at)ske bolesti", čiji se uzroci mogu tražiti i u
institucionalnim i povijesno-kulturološkim činjenicama. Dok u Bosni i
37

Prema: Roljić, L., Digitalna forenzika u dokaznom postupku i u funkciji ublažavanja posljedica
korupcije, Zbornik radova, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta „Vitez“, Vitez, str. 93

66

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

Hercegovini ovi uzroci leže u divergentnim političkim vizijama proizašlim iz
etnički podjeljenog ustrojstva državne zajednice i nametnutog neoliberalnog
modelom ekonomskog razvoja, izvorište korupcije u Srbiji počiva na
jednonacionalnoj „partijskoj državi“ i pretjeranim regulacijama, a u Crnoj
Gori korupcija proizilazi iz tradicionalističkog, homogenog društva,
karakterističnog po političkom uvezivanju obiteljskih klanova i posebne
crnogorsko arhaične institucije kumstva. Sadašnja ocjena o stanju korupcije u
zemljama Zapadnog Balkana govori da je prisutna izvjesna stagnacija u borbi
protiv korupcije, što s jedne strane, upućuje na zaostajanje razvoja (korupcija
je u negativnoj korelaciji sa ekonomskim rastom), ugrožavanje
makroekonomske, političke i socijalne stabilnosti, te destimuliranje
pristizanja investicija, a s druge, na izvjestan neuspjeh provođenje
antikorupcijskih programa.
Državne institucije simuliraju napore u borbi protiv korupcije, a
zapravo nemaju nikakav interes da projekat borbe protiv korupcije i jačanja
kapaciteta policije i lokalnih organa uspije. Osnovni problem implementacije
antikorupcijskih programa je nedostatak političke volje, bez obzira na
postojanje zakona iz ove oblasti koji su normativno, u većini zemalja
zapadnog balkana, izuzetno dobri. Monitoring procesa borbe protiv korupcije
zahtijeva, pored učešća državnih organa i medunarodne zajednice, i aktivno
učešće medija i civilnog sektora.
Zbog različitih mreža korupcije i njihove povezanosti, bilo kakva
izolovana akcija na njenom suzbijanju ne može dati rezultate na duži rok. S
obzirom na to da je korupcija u sistem(at)ski projekat vlasti-, privremeni
efekti koji u određenom trenutku pritiska od strane međunarodne zajednice
postaju transparentni neće biti ljekoviti za ovu «društvenu bolest». Mjera koja
bi bila sprovodiva i koja bi dala rezultate na duži rok odnosi se na
uspostavljanje i razvoj pravne države i podizanje životnog standarda gradjana
i ekonomskog nivoa društva uopšte. To bi postepeno dovelo do isključenja
izvora korupcije.
Uspješnost borbe i budućnost korupcije zavise u
velikoj mjeri, što se i vidi iz stavova ispitanika u istraživanjima, od
uspostavljanja valjanog zakonodavstva, zatim razvoja institucija sistema,
civilnog društva i edukacije. Neophodne su izmjene zakonskih odredbi, poput
Izbornog zakona i Zakona o finansiranju političkih partija, te poboljšavanje
Zakona o javnim nabavkama. Pri tome ne treba zanemariti ulogu koju mediji
mogu imati u prokazivanju korumptivnih radnji, pa je neophodno
usklađivanje entitetskih zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama s državnim
67

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

zakonom, sa uvođenjem kazni za nepoštivanje zakona, U situaciji kada je
činjenično i na pravosudnim organima teško dokazati postojanje korupcije
jedna medijska kampanja na razotkrivanju i imenovanju nosilaca korupcije
može dati značajne rezultate. Slobodni mediji imaju podsticajnu ulogu u
ekonomskom razvoju, a posebno u borbi protiv siromaštva. Samim tim takva
aktivnost znači i manje korupcije budući da, ponekad, ocjena medija ima
veću težinu neko osuda nekog političkog, državnog ili pravosudnog organa.
Teorijski okvir za elaboriranje borbe protiv korupcije u rascjepu je
dva suprostavljena teorijsko-ideološka prisupa. Prvi je intervencionistički i
podrazumijeva izraženu političku volju političke i zakonodavne vlasti i
odlučnost vlasti da se sistemski uhvati u koštac sa izazovima korupcije, a
drugi je libertarijanistički u kome se deregulacijom i liberalizacijom uklanja
korist od korupcije za koruptore, a mehanizam spriječavanja uzroka korupcije
su ementi strategije otjelotvoreni otvara se zdravim, liberalnim ekonomskim
politikama.
Korupcija u urušenim tranzijskim društvima je pravilo sa
kvalifikacijama sistem(at)ske bolesti. Odgovornom političaru i nosiocu
državne i političke funkcije je i percepcija dovoljan znak za uzbunu i
pokretanje inicijative i radnji za njeno suzbijanje.

LITERATURA
Begović, Boris (2007), Ekonomska analiza korupcije, Centar za liberalnodemokratske studije, Beograd.
Brioschi, C.A. (2007), Kratka povijest korupcije, MATE, Zagreb.
Corruption Perceptions Index 2012. Full table and rankings. Transparency
International.
Retrieved:
4
February
2013.,
dostupno
na
www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview.
Corruption Index (2001), Colalition 2000, Sofia.
Gamser, D. (2012), Korupcija u Srbiji za 2012. godinu, Centar za
evroatlanske studije, dostupno na: ceas-serbia.org/.../75-korupcija-u-srbiji2012-godinu
68

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

Hodžić, K. (2004), (Re)privatizacija i globalizacija, „Forum Bosnae“,
Sarajevo.
Hodžić, K., Vukadinović, S. (2004), Korupcija kao sistem(at)ski projekat u
urušenim tranzicijskim društvima (case study – Bosna i Hercegovina i Crna
Gora), „Tranzicija“, Vol. VI, No 15.
IDS Bulletin (1998).
Izvještaj o istraživanju percepcije korupcije u Bosni i Hercegovini,
Udruženje RADIO KAMELEON – Otvorena mreža ljudskih prava i
demokratije, projekat za Centre civilnih inicijativa u okviru projekta ‘’
MitoLovac’’, 2011.
Izvještaj o istraživanju percepcije korupcije u Bosni i Hercegovini,
Udruženje RADIO KAMELEON – Otvorena mreža ljudskih prava i
demokratije, projekat za Centre civilnih inicijativa u okviru projekta ‘’
MitoLovac’’, 2011.
Izveštaj pripremljen za UNDP Srbija, Percepcija korupcije na nivou
domaćinstva. Peti talas, Jun 2012. www.undp.org.rs/index.cfm?event=public
Izvješće Američke privredne komore na Kosovu, dnevnik.hr/.../korupcija-nakosovu-poprima-zabrinjavajuce-razmjere.ht.
Korupcija u BiH – Analiza stanja, Opservatorij ljudskih prava u BiH,
www.ljudskaprava.ba/korupcija-u-bih-analiza-stanja.
Kolodko, G.Z. (2000). From Recession to Growth in Transition Economies, IMF
Working Paper.

Kolodko, G.W. (2000), Economic Neolibealism Became Almost Irrelevant,
„Transition“, World Bank, Washington, Vol. 9, No. 3.
Krstić, O. (2009), Neki uzroci korupcije u Republici Srbiji, Zbornik radova
„Korupcija i pranje novca“, Internacionalna asocijacija kriminalista Banja
Luka, Sarajevo.

69

�Kadrija Hodžić, Edin Osmanbegović: UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U
URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA

Mijatović, B. (2007), Prikaz knjige: Boris Begović: Ekonomska analiza
korupcije, CL DS (dostupno na:
www.clds.rs/newsite/aktivnosti_mediji_prikaz-korupcija.html ).
Mauro, P. (1995), Corruption and Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Vol. 110, August.
Mappes-Niedik, N. (2003), Balkanska mafija, Durieux, Zagreb.
Podumljak, M. (2010), Percepcija i stavovi o korupciji na Zapadnom
Balkanu – regionalni pregled,
www.integrityobservers.eu/default.aspx?id=10.
Rendić-Miočević, I. (1996), Zlo velike jetre, povijest i nepovijest
Crnogoraca, Hrvata, Muslimana i Srba, Književni krug, Split.
Roljić, L. (2013), Digitalna forenzika u dokaznom postupku i u funkciji
ublažavanja posljedica korupcije Zbornik radova, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta
„Vitez“, Vitez.
Stiglitz, J. (1999), Reform? Ten Years of the Postsocialist Transition, The
World Bank, Washington D.C.
Skakavac, Z, Skakavac, T. (2013), Korupcija u vezi sa privatizacijom
preduzeća – situacija u Republici Srbiji, Zbornik radova, Pravni fakultet
Sveučilišta „Vitez“, Vitez.
Stojanov, D. (1999), The elements of alternative development stragies for
transition economies, „Tranzicija“, Vol 1, No 2-3.
Stiglitz, J. (2004), Globalization nad its Discontens, W.W. Norton and
Company, New York.
Transparency International BiH, Studiji percepcija korupcije BiH, Banja
Luka/Sarajevo, 2002.
Transparency International (2012). "Corruption Perceptions Index 2012: In
detail".
70

�ZBORNIK RADOVA - Međunarodna naučna konferencija „Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih
reformi u BiH: Koliko daleko možemo ići?“

Transparency International (2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007). "Corruption
Perceptions Index".
Transparency International, Izvještaj o korupciji za 2010,
www.dw.de/koja-zemlja-je-najkorumpiranija-na-svijetu/a-6220568.

prema:

Vukadinović, S., Medojević, N., Đeković, D. (2003), Korupcija i
transparetnost na lokalnom nivou u Crnoj Gori, Agencija za lokalnu
demokratiju, Nikšić.
Vuković, S. (2003), Korupcija i vladavina prava, Beograd: IDN – Draganić.
Zbornik radova Korupcija u odsustvu prava. Ogledi iz Bosne i Hercegovine,
Hrvatske, Srbije i Crne Gore (2004), Fondacija Henrich Bell, Sarajevo
(prilozi Z. Golubović, S Kukića, N. Mapes-Niedika).

71

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7653">
                <text>3055</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7654">
                <text>UVOD U POLITIČKU EKONOMIJU KORUPCIJE U URUŠENIM TRANZICIJSKIM DRUŠTVIMA</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7655">
                <text>HODŽIĆ, Kadrija
OSMANBEGOVIĆ, Edin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7656">
                <text>Autori polaze od teze da je korupcija u urušenim tranzicijskim  društvima, što dokazuju na primjerima Bosne i Hercegovine, Srbije i Crne  Gore, pravilo sa kvalifikacijama "sistem(at)ske bolesti." Sistem(at)ski uzroci  korupcije inicirani su i produbljeni obrisima tranzicione krize, koju  karakteriziraju uslovi za pohranjivanje korupcije: institucionalna  neizgrađenost društva, produbljeni nivo siromaštva i nepripremljena  privatizacija. Povijesno-kulturološki okvir u kome su se ove zemlje razvijale  dodatno komplicira percepciju korupcije. Dok u Bosni i Hercegovini ovi  izvori leže u novom (temeljem Daytonskog ugovora) etnički razdjeljenom  ustrojstvu državne zajednice i primjenjenom obrascu neoliberalnog razvoja, u  kome političko nacionalne elite svoju korumpiranost pokrivaju divergentnim  vizijama o Bosni i Hercegovini, u Srbiji se korupcija veže za jednonacionalnu  „partijsku državu“ i državnu regulaciju, a u Crnoj Gori korupcija proizilazi iz  tradicionalističkog, homogenog društva, karakterističnog po političkom  uvezivanju obiteljskih klanova i posebne crnogorsko arhaične institucije  kumstva. Ostatak regiona Zapadnog Balkana (Albanija, Kosovo), bez obzira  na izvjesne napretke, ima još veću podložnost korupciji. U na ovaj način  urušenim tranzicijskim društvima korupcija je postala uobičajeni «način  života». Budući da je pitanje korupcije povezano i u sprezi je sa  organizovanim kriminalom (uvezanog ili iniciranog sa nivoa političke i  ekonomske moći) problem korupcije, po pravilu, ima i regionalnu dimenziju.  Nijedno od tri pomenuta društva, kao ni većina ostalih u ambijentu  Zapadnog Balkana ne mogu sama rješavati ovaj problem, pa autori upučuji  na primjenu međunarodnih standarda i pomoć međunarodnih institucija, koji  će pomoći izgradnju normativne infrastrukture u cilju suzbijanja korupcije,  ali i doprinijeti poticaju ekonomskog rasta i održivoj demokratiji civilnog društva.  Autori skreću pažnju i na otvorene teorijsko-ideološke dileme o  prirodi nastanka korupcije. Dilema je upravljena na izbor između dva  pristupa: (1) da li se korupcija veže za nesposobnost vlada da kroz pravni  sistem uspostave efikasne kontrole javnih tokova i onemogućavanja  korišćenja javne službe za privatne ciljeve, ili se (2) korupcija veže za  nepostojanje tržišta i otvaranje prostora za uspostavljanje monopola u  odlučivanju. Od odgovora na ovu dilemu umnogome ovise konceptualiziranja  strategija i mjera sprječavanja korupcije. U prvom slučaju, odgovor u  pojednostavljenom iskazu podrazumjeva uspostavljanje jake države i vlade  spremne da se uhvati u koštac sa korupcijom (dakle, povećane javne kontrole  i razine regulacija), a u drugom, odsustvo monopola (dakle, širenje slobode  tržišta). Ovu dilemu autori prevazilaze s tezom da je moguće prevazići  korupciju ako ustanovimo da je "jaka država", zapravo, neophodna radi  nesmetanog funkcioniranja tržišnog mehanizma i njegovih osnovnih  institucija, prije svega zaštite svojine i ugovora, a ne radi uspostavljanja  levijatanske birokracije.  Ključne riječi: korupcija, tranzicija, urušena tranzicijska društva, „balkansko  društvo“, Bosna i Hercegovina, Crna Gora, Srbija.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7657">
                <text>Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Tuzli i Centar za društvena istraživanja Internacionalnog Burč univerziteta</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7658">
                <text>2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7659">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="19">
        <name>K Law (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1153" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1239">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/0940d1fd483b416dbb31218d3eab49a4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7747866089f580183730b9b9e26e3869</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="8982">
                    <text>��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="1240">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/2b76573b00c1b32ef205331393e25d2f.docx</src>
        <authentication>7f253f0f0f42b5a7aad2d575a991c03e</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8975">
                <text>3125</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8976">
                <text>UVODNA RIJEČ DEKANA</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8977">
                <text>VELADŽIĆ, Nevzet</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8978">
                <text>Uvažavajući značaj osnovnog strateškog interesa Bosne i Hercegovine i njenih građana, a koji se zasniva na potrebi ostvarivanja svih bitnih preduvjeta za što brži pristup Bosne i Hercegovine u Evropsku uniju i NATO savez, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Bihaću i Centar za društvena istraživanja Internacionalnog Burč univerziteta organiziraju II Međunarodnu naučnu konferenciju ''Bosna i Hercegovina i euroatlantske integracije – trenutni izazovi i perspektive''. Konferencijom se nastoji unaprijediti daljnji proces interdisciplinarnog i multidisciplinarnog istraživanja koja se tiču tekućih, kompleksnih i međusobno povezanih pravnih, političkih, kulturoloških i socio¬ekonomskih procesa euroatlantskih integracija, da se analizirajući postojeće stanje ponude potencijalna rješenja i prijedlozi u vezi sa pristupanjem Bosne i Hercegovine euroatlantskim integracijama. Ova činjenica je utoliko značajnija ukoliko se posmatra u historijskoj perspektivi postratne obnove, tranzicije i pronalaženja evropskog puta u razvoju bosanskohercegovačkih odnosa.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8979">
                <text>Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Bihaću i Centar za društvena istraživanja Internacionalnog Burč univerziteta</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8980">
                <text>2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8981">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="19">
        <name>K Law (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="769" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="869">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/03d85478f6c35a2996a934d4d8819868.pdf</src>
        <authentication>57706d85b1b93bd104635491e398517a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6214">
                    <text>UVODNA RIJEČ GLAVNOG UREDNIKA

Poštovani čitaoci,
Čast i zadovoljstvo mi je da u ulozi glavnog urednika predstavim prvi broj
časopisa „Društveni ogledi“. Osnivanjem Centra za društvena istraživanja
Internacionalnog Burč univerziteta, javila se ideja za pokretanjem naučnog časopisa
koji bi predstavljao rezultat potrebe za ukazivanjem na bitna pitanja iz oblasti
društvenih nauka, prevashodno prava, u teoriji i praksi. Časopis ima za cilj
unapređenje naučno-istraživačkog rada u oblasti pravnih i drugih srodnih društvenih
nauka, a namijenjen je svima koji se bave istraživačkim radom, nudeći im mjesto
susreta, zbližavanja, premoštavanja različitih stavova i mišljenja, ostavljajući prostor
zajedničkom djelovanju.
Uzimajući u obzir specifično pravno uređenje Bosne i Hercegovine, naročito
u smislu približavanja evroatlanskim integracijama, časopis ima za cilj savladavanje
poteškoća sa kojima se naša država susreće na tom putu, te iznalaženje mogućih
rješenja kako u vidu teorijskog poimanja, tako i u praktičnom smislu.
Također, značaj časopisa se ogleda u tome što pruža mogućnost dijaloga na
nivou cijele Bosne i Hercegovine i šire, te teži uspostavljanju jedinstvenog naučnoistraživačkog prostora internacionalnog karaktera. To je opredijelilo uređivački
odbor da buduće brojeve časopisa selektira po tematskim cjelinama, odnosno
aktuelnim pravnim pitanjima s kojima se Bosna i Hercegovina susreće u procesu
pridruživanja Evropskoj uniji.
Zasluge za ovaj veliki projekt pripadaju kolegama sa Pravnog fakulteta
Univerziteta u Sarajevu, Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Tuzli, Pravnog fakulteta
Univerziteta u Zenici, Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Bihaću i Pravnog fakulteta
Univerziteta u Mostaru, a naročitu zahvalnost iskazujemo Internacionalnom Burč
univerzitetu, pokrovitelju cjelokupnog projekta.

Glavni urednik
Prof. dr. Abedin Bikić

Centar za društvena istraživanja | Godina 1 | Broj1

7

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6206">
                <text>2362</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6207">
                <text>UVODNA RIJEČ GLAVNOG UREDNIKA</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6208">
                <text>BIKIĆ, Abedin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6209">
                <text>Poštovani čitaoci,    Čast i zadovoljstvo mi je da u ulozi glavnog urednika predstavim prvi broj časopisa „Društveni ogledi“. Osnivanjem Centra za društvena istraživanja Internacionalnog Burč univerziteta, javila se ideja za pokretanjem naučnog časopisa koji bi predstavljao rezultat potrebe za ukazivanjem na bitna pitanja iz oblasti društvenih nauka, prevashodno prava, u teoriji i praksi. Časopis ima za cilj unapređenje naučno-istraživačkog rada u oblasti pravnih i drugih srodnih društvenih nauka, a namijenjen je svima koji se bave istraživačkim radom, nudeći im mjesto susreta, zbližavanja, premoštavanja različitih stavova i mišljenja, ostavljajući prostor zajedničkom djelovanju.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6210">
                <text>Social Sciences Research Center of International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6211">
                <text>2014-04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6212">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6213">
                <text>ISSN 2303-5706     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="517" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="537">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/7d4f32915e9fc78eaadeded95bba3db2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>49eee5e8c43aa9f8c429cb6663ad13b2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="3980">
                    <text>��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3971">
                <text>2422</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3972">
                <text>Uvodna riječ glavnog urednika - Broj 2/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3973">
                <text>BIKIĆ, Abedin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3974">
                <text>“Social Perspectives - Journal for Legal Theory and Practice“ is available in full text at the Central and  Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL (www.ceeol.com) and on the web page www.ssrc.ibu.edu.ba</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3975">
                <text>Social Sciences Research Center of International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3976">
                <text>2014-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3977">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="98">
            <name>DOI</name>
            <description>Digital object identifier</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3978">
                <text>DOI: 10.14706/DO14111     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3979">
                <text>ISSN 2303-5706 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="874" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1030">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/5acdd5b0e7ebd0f240a8112fd3308fdf.pdf</src>
        <authentication>49eee5e8c43aa9f8c429cb6663ad13b2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="7098">
                    <text>��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7091">
                <text>2981</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7092">
                <text>Uvodna riječ glavnog urednika 2/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7093">
                <text>BIKIĆ, Abedin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7094">
                <text>Centar za društvena istraživanja Internacionalnog Burc univerziteta</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7095">
                <text>2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7096">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7097">
                <text>ISSN 2303-5706     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="59">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General),K Law (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="428" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="437">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/856d0c9e6b2db90fd548ea87579588e8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5a083a4bfbb9b3fb8bea4dbde52f7ec9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="3276">
                    <text>UVODNA RIJEČ GLAVNOG UREDNIKA

Poštovani čitaoci,
Pred Vama se nalazi treći broj časopisa „Društveni ogledi“. Sa osnovnom
namjerom unaprjeđenja naučno-istraživačkog rada u oblasti pravnih i drugih srodnih
društvenih nauka, časopis je za kratko vrijeme postao respektabilan i privlačan
širokom krugu istraživača i naučnika u BiH i inozemstvu.
U skladu sa željom da časopis „Društveni ogledi“ postane jedan od vodećih
naučnih publikacija u BiH, uredništvo časopisa je od samog početka konstantno
poduzimalo korake ka njegovom unaprjeđenju i međunarodnom indeksiranju.
Posljedica tog rada se ogleda u indeksiranju časopisa u nekoliko međunarodno
priznatih baza podataka.
Treći broj časopisa nam predstavlja naučne radove istaknutih akademskih i
stručnih radnika na različitim poljima pravne nauke. Također, pružen je prikaz
međunarodne naučno-stručne konferencije „Izgradnja modernog pravnog sistema“, a
čiji su istaknuti učesnici objavili svoje radove u ovom izdanju.
Na kraju, želim se toplo zahvaliti kolegama sa pravnih fakulteta iz Bosne i
Hercegovine, a posebnu zahvalnost izražavam mladim kolegama Centra za društvena
istraživanja, organizatoru cjelokupnog projekta.

Glavni urednik
Prof. dr. Abedin Bikić

Centar za društvena istraživanja | Godina 2 | Broj 1

7

�FOREWORD BY CHIEF EDITOR

Respected Readers,
It is great pleasure to introduce the third issue of the journal „Social
Perspectives“. With the main idea of scientific research advancing in the field of legal
and other related social sciences, the journal has quickly become respectable and
attractive to a wide circle of researchers and scientists in Bosnia and Herzegovina as
well as abroad.
In accordance with the desire for „Social Perspectives“ to become one of the
leading scientific publications in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Editorial board of the
journal was, from the very beginning, constantly taking steps towards its
development and international indexing. Consequently, the journal has found itself
in many internationally recognized legal databases.
In this Issue, you will find scientific works of distinguished professors and
practitioners from a different fields of legal science. Also, review of the Scientific
International Conference: „Establishment of a Modern Legal System“ is presented in
the end. Participants at the Conference also published their works in this issue.
Ultimately, I want to express my gratitude to colleagues from law schools in
Bosnia and Herzegovina, and special thanks to colleagues from Social Sciences
Research Center, organizers of the whole project.

Editor-in-chief
Prof. dr. Abedin Bikić

8

Društveni ogledi - Časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3268">
                <text>2984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3269">
                <text>UVODNA RIJEČ GLAVNOG UREDNIKA br.3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3270">
                <text>BIKIĆ, Abedin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3271">
                <text>Poštovani čitaoci,    Pred Vama se nalazi treći broj časopisa „Društveni ogledi“. Sa osnovnom  namjerom unaprjeđenja naučno-istraživačkog rada u oblasti pravnih i drugih srodnih  društvenih nauka, časopis je za kratko vrijeme postao respektabilan i privlačan  širokom krugu istraživača i naučnika u BiH i inozemstvu.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3272">
                <text>Centar za društvena istraživanja Internacionalnog Burc univerziteta</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3273">
                <text>2015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3274">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3275">
                <text>ISSN 2303-6281     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="59">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General),K Law (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="540" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="541">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/5bfebf00a23457a14d08da7a9c6ec02a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b9f3e1f2d22602f5379d5b3409b44f33</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="4170">
                    <text>FOREWORD EDITOR OF SPECIAL ISSUE
Intellectual property represents a field of law that has its finger on the pulse of time and
current developments in science, technology, art, politics and economy in almost an unprecedented
manner. As a consequence, the legislation and practice in this area find themselves in a constant
endeavor of offering adequate response and adapting to these changing circumstances and challenges.
The complexity and sensitivity of the nature of this field, also from a legal and political point of view,
makes this task even more demanding.
The legislation and practice in the field of intellectual property in the selected countries of
the region South-Eastern Europe (Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro,
Macedonia and Albania) are certainly not immune to the mention developments. Nevertheless,
while they face certain global challenges (e.g. the effects of digital technologies on the use, management and enforcement on subject matter protected by these rights), they are also confronted with
particular, rather specific issues that are determined by their legal history, cultural environment,
political developments or their position in the process of European integration.
In the initial phase of the planning of this conference, a presumption was established that
due to the geographic proximity, surmountable language barriers, common or similar history and
comparable economic situation some of these particular challenges may not only be strictly national,
but represent cross-border, or regional issues. If that should be the case, then also the solutions to
these challenges need to be proposed and implemented on the regional and not on the isolated
national level.
In order to examine the validity of that presumption and establish the foundation for this
conference, the contributors from the selected countries of the region were asked to critically examine
their national legislation and practice in three selected fields: collective management of copyright and
related rights, patents and trade marks. Hence, the topics dealt within the framework of this conference are not exhaustive and reflect only particular central elements of the discussion on challenges in
the field of intellectual property in the selected countries of South-Eastern Europe, but also the EU.
Hence the objective of this conference in the regional context was to search for challenges
and offer solutions in particular areas of intellectual property that are relevant and valid beyond the
national laws of countries of the region.
The preparatory stage of the conference with regard to challenges in the region SouthEastern Europe (“Regional challenges”) was comprised of four phases:
Phase I/Detecting the Challenges: Country reports on challenges in the field of collective
management of copyright and related rights, patents and trademarks.
In this initial phase, the contributors were asked the prepare reports providing overview
over the national systems (of collective management, patents and trade mark) and foremost underlining major issues/challenges in the practice and in the legislative field on the basis of provided
questionnaires.
Phase II/Facing the Challenges: Summaries of challenges in each field.
In this phase three summaries of challenges (for each area separately) were prepared on the
basis of provided country reports on challenges, where similar challenges in the region were underlined and combined, but also specific national issues were emphasized.

�Phase III/Dealing with the Challenges: Conventional solutions and „outside the box“
solutions for challenges in each field.
For the preparation of this phase the contributors submitted their proposals for dealing
with the challenges detected in the national reports and summarized in Phase II that are however not
only valid for their own country, but represent cross -border solutions of a particular issue for the
region. The proposed solutions represented both conventional and non-conventional/„outside the
box“ suggestions aiming for the elimination of a particular challenge, irrespective of potential political or systematic obstacles.
Phase IV/Eliminating the Challenges: Consolidated conventional and „outside the box“
solutions.
Finally in the last phase, the conventional and “outside the box” solutions submitted by the
contributors were summarized in form of an outline of guidelines for dealing with the detected
challenges.
Similar to the region South-Eastern Europe also the European union is facing with a set of
specific issues in the field of intellectual property such as cross-border licensing of rights in musical
works, the long-lasting process of introducing a unitary patent protection, or the deficiencies of the
unitary trademark system (“EU-challenges”). Despite the fact that not all of selected countries of the
region are members of the EU, some of the latter challenges already have or will have an impact on
each of them. Thereby a paradox is created, as the countries of the region striving toward a
EU-membership are partially under the obligation to adopt the “imperfect” EU systems of protection of intellectual property. On the other hand, the countries of the region that are EU-member
states potentially face twofold challenges. The ones they are confronted with in the unitary context
and the others that are rooted in their own national systems of collective copyright management,
patents or trademarks and that are more “regionally-oriented”. Finally, during the preparation of the
conference it was also presumed that some of the regional and EU-challenges coincide and that the
already established solutions on the EU-level and/or the proposed solutions on the regional level
might initiate a discussion that could eventually lead to the elimination of the latter.
Consequently, also the contributors from the EU used a similar approach as the ones from
the region and identified the mayor challenges in the field of collective management of copyright and
related rights, patents and trademarks in the EU and offered conventional and “out of the box”
solutions.
It needs to be emphasized that the opinions and propositions expressed by the contributors
represent their personal views and should not be attributed to their respective institutions and organizations.
We would like to use this opportunity to thank all the contributors who participated in the
preparation of this conference for the effort they invested in shaping this, as we consider, comprehensive and unique mutual research project.
Dr. Iza Razija Mešević
Conference Chairman

�THE CONTRIBUTORS
Aleš Oražem / Intellectual Property Office of Republic of Slovenia/Head of TM Division; Croatia;
Dr. Christopher Heath / European Patent Office / Member of Board of Appeal Legal Board of Appeal;
Dr. Draginja Vuksanović / Law Faculty of University of Podgorica / Assistant Professor;
Dr. Dušan Popović / Law Faculty of University of Belgrade / Associate Professor;
Dr. Egon Engin-Deniz / CMS RRH Vienna / Partner / Head of IP;
Dr. Igor Gliha / Law Faculty of University of Zagreb / Professor;
Dr. Ivana Kunda / Law Faculty of University of Rijeka / Assistant Professor;
Dr. Iza Razija Mešević / Law Faculty of University of Sarajevo / Assistant Professor;
Dr. Jadranka Dabovik - Anstasovska / Law Faculty Iustinian I / University Ss. Cyril and Methodius Skopje;
Dr. Martina Repas / Law Faculty of University of Maribor / Associate Professor;
Dr. Neda Zdraveva / Law Faculty Iustinian I / University Ss. Cyril and Methodius Skopje / Assistant Professor;
Dr. Romana Matanovac Vučković / Law Faculty of University of Zagreb / Assistant Professor;
Dr. Silke von Lewinski / MPI for Innovation and Competition) / Senior Research Fellow; Franklin Pierce /
Center for IP / Uni of NH / Adj Professor;
Dr. Siniša Varga / Law Faculty of University of Kragujevac / Associate Professor;
Dr. Slobodan Marković / Law Faculty of University of Belgrade / Professor;
PD Dr. Thomas Jaeger, LL.M. (K.U. Leuven) / Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition / Senior
Research Fellow; Leibniz University Hanover / Substitute Chair in Labor, Company and Civil Law;
Dr. Zhaklina Peto / Law Faculty of University of Tirana / Associate Professor;
Oltion Spiro / Loloci and Associates Tirana;
Robert Kordić / CMS RRH Sarajevo / Senior Legal Adviser;

�THE CONTRIBUTORS BY FIELD AND REGIONS
Contributors (EU Challenges):
Trademarks (Dr. Egon Engin-Deniz / CMS RRH Vienna / Partner / Head of IP), Patents
(Dr. Thomas Jaeger / MPI for Innovation and Competition and Dr. Christopher Heath /
European Patent Office / Member of Board of Appeal Legal Board of Appeal) and Collective
copyright management (Dr. Silke von Lewinski / MPI for Innovation and Competition)
Contributors (Regional Challenges):
Collective copyright management (Slovenia: Dr. Martina Repas / Law Faculty of University of
Maribor, Associate Professor; Croatia: Dr. Igor Gliha / Law Faculty of University of
Zagreb/Professor; Bosnia and Herzegovina: Dr. Iza Razija Mešević / Law Faculty of University of
Sarajevo/ Assistant Professor; Serbia: Dr. Dušan Popović / Law Faculty of University of
Belgrade/Associate Professor; Macedonia: Dr. Jadranka Dabovik- Anstasovska (Professor) and
Dr. Neda Zdraveva (Assistant Professor)/Law Faculty Iustinian I/University Ss. Cyril and Methodius Skopje: Montenegro: Dr. Draginja Vuksanović / Law Faculty of University of
Podgorica/Assistant Professor and Albania: Dr. Zhaklina Peto / Law Faculty of University of
Tirana/Associate Professor and Oltion Spiro / Loloci and Associates Tirana).
Trademarks (Slovenia: Aleš Oražem / Intellectual Property Office of Republic of Slovenia/Head of
TM Division; Croatia: Dr. Romana Matanovac / Law Faculty of University of Zagreb/Assistant
Professor; Bosnia and Herzegovina: Dr. Iza Razija Mešević / Law Faculty of University of
Sarajevo/ Assistant Professor; Serbia: Dr. Siniša Varga / Law Faculty of University of
Kragujevac/Associate Professor; Macedonia: Dr. Jadranka Dabovik - Anstasovska (Professor) and
Dr. Neda Zdraveva (Assistant Professor)/Law Faculty Iustinian I/University Ss. Cyril and Methodius Skopje: Montenegro: Dr. Draginja Vuksanović / Law Faculty of University of
Podgorica/Assistant Professor and Albania: Dr. Zhaklina Peto / Law Faculty of University of
Tirana/Associate Professor and Oltion Spiro / Loloci and Associates Tirana).
Patents (Slovenia: Robert Kordić / CMS RRH Sarajevo/Senior Legal Adviser; Croatia: Dr. Ivana
Kunda / Law Faculty of University of Rijeka/Assistant Professor; Bosnia and Herzegovina: Robert
Kordić / CMS RRH Sarajevo/Senior Legal Adviser Serbia: Dr. Slobodan Marković / Law Faculty
of University of Belgrade/Professor; Macedonia: Dr. Jadranka Dabovik- Anstasovska (Professor)
and Dr. Neda Zdraveva (Assistant Professor)/Law Faculty Iustinian I/University Ss. Cyril and
Methodius Skopje: Montenegro: Dr. Draginja Vuksanović / Law Faculty of University of
Podgorica/Assistant Professor and Albania: Dr. Zhaklina Peto / Law Faculty of University of
Tirana/Associate Professor and Oltion Spiro / Loloci and Associates Tirana.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4161">
                <text>2423</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4162">
                <text>Uvodna riječ urednika specijalnog izdanja - Broj 2/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4163">
                <text>MEŠEVIĆ, Iza Razija</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4164">
                <text>“Social Perspectives - Journal for Legal Theory and Practice“ is available in full text at the Central and  Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL (www.ceeol.com) and on the web page www.ssrc.ibu.edu.ba</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4165">
                <text>Social Sciences Research Center of International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4166">
                <text>2014-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4167">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="98">
            <name>DOI</name>
            <description>Digital object identifier</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4168">
                <text>DOI: 10.14706/DO14111     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4169">
                <text>ISSN 2303-5706 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1037" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1157">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/eaa110178e14269ef35450606f42af01.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b9f3e1f2d22602f5379d5b3409b44f33</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="8205">
                    <text>FOREWORD EDITOR OF SPECIAL ISSUE
Intellectual property represents a field of law that has its finger on the pulse of time and
current developments in science, technology, art, politics and economy in almost an unprecedented
manner. As a consequence, the legislation and practice in this area find themselves in a constant
endeavor of offering adequate response and adapting to these changing circumstances and challenges.
The complexity and sensitivity of the nature of this field, also from a legal and political point of view,
makes this task even more demanding.
The legislation and practice in the field of intellectual property in the selected countries of
the region South-Eastern Europe (Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro,
Macedonia and Albania) are certainly not immune to the mention developments. Nevertheless,
while they face certain global challenges (e.g. the effects of digital technologies on the use, management and enforcement on subject matter protected by these rights), they are also confronted with
particular, rather specific issues that are determined by their legal history, cultural environment,
political developments or their position in the process of European integration.
In the initial phase of the planning of this conference, a presumption was established that
due to the geographic proximity, surmountable language barriers, common or similar history and
comparable economic situation some of these particular challenges may not only be strictly national,
but represent cross-border, or regional issues. If that should be the case, then also the solutions to
these challenges need to be proposed and implemented on the regional and not on the isolated
national level.
In order to examine the validity of that presumption and establish the foundation for this
conference, the contributors from the selected countries of the region were asked to critically examine
their national legislation and practice in three selected fields: collective management of copyright and
related rights, patents and trade marks. Hence, the topics dealt within the framework of this conference are not exhaustive and reflect only particular central elements of the discussion on challenges in
the field of intellectual property in the selected countries of South-Eastern Europe, but also the EU.
Hence the objective of this conference in the regional context was to search for challenges
and offer solutions in particular areas of intellectual property that are relevant and valid beyond the
national laws of countries of the region.
The preparatory stage of the conference with regard to challenges in the region SouthEastern Europe (“Regional challenges”) was comprised of four phases:
Phase I/Detecting the Challenges: Country reports on challenges in the field of collective
management of copyright and related rights, patents and trademarks.
In this initial phase, the contributors were asked the prepare reports providing overview
over the national systems (of collective management, patents and trade mark) and foremost underlining major issues/challenges in the practice and in the legislative field on the basis of provided
questionnaires.
Phase II/Facing the Challenges: Summaries of challenges in each field.
In this phase three summaries of challenges (for each area separately) were prepared on the
basis of provided country reports on challenges, where similar challenges in the region were underlined and combined, but also specific national issues were emphasized.

�Phase III/Dealing with the Challenges: Conventional solutions and „outside the box“
solutions for challenges in each field.
For the preparation of this phase the contributors submitted their proposals for dealing
with the challenges detected in the national reports and summarized in Phase II that are however not
only valid for their own country, but represent cross -border solutions of a particular issue for the
region. The proposed solutions represented both conventional and non-conventional/„outside the
box“ suggestions aiming for the elimination of a particular challenge, irrespective of potential political or systematic obstacles.
Phase IV/Eliminating the Challenges: Consolidated conventional and „outside the box“
solutions.
Finally in the last phase, the conventional and “outside the box” solutions submitted by the
contributors were summarized in form of an outline of guidelines for dealing with the detected
challenges.
Similar to the region South-Eastern Europe also the European union is facing with a set of
specific issues in the field of intellectual property such as cross-border licensing of rights in musical
works, the long-lasting process of introducing a unitary patent protection, or the deficiencies of the
unitary trademark system (“EU-challenges”). Despite the fact that not all of selected countries of the
region are members of the EU, some of the latter challenges already have or will have an impact on
each of them. Thereby a paradox is created, as the countries of the region striving toward a
EU-membership are partially under the obligation to adopt the “imperfect” EU systems of protection of intellectual property. On the other hand, the countries of the region that are EU-member
states potentially face twofold challenges. The ones they are confronted with in the unitary context
and the others that are rooted in their own national systems of collective copyright management,
patents or trademarks and that are more “regionally-oriented”. Finally, during the preparation of the
conference it was also presumed that some of the regional and EU-challenges coincide and that the
already established solutions on the EU-level and/or the proposed solutions on the regional level
might initiate a discussion that could eventually lead to the elimination of the latter.
Consequently, also the contributors from the EU used a similar approach as the ones from
the region and identified the mayor challenges in the field of collective management of copyright and
related rights, patents and trademarks in the EU and offered conventional and “out of the box”
solutions.
It needs to be emphasized that the opinions and propositions expressed by the contributors
represent their personal views and should not be attributed to their respective institutions and organizations.
We would like to use this opportunity to thank all the contributors who participated in the
preparation of this conference for the effort they invested in shaping this, as we consider, comprehensive and unique mutual research project.
Dr. Iza Razija Mešević
Conference Chairman

�THE CONTRIBUTORS
Aleš Oražem / Intellectual Property Office of Republic of Slovenia/Head of TM Division; Croatia;
Dr. Christopher Heath / European Patent Office / Member of Board of Appeal Legal Board of Appeal;
Dr. Draginja Vuksanović / Law Faculty of University of Podgorica / Assistant Professor;
Dr. Dušan Popović / Law Faculty of University of Belgrade / Associate Professor;
Dr. Egon Engin-Deniz / CMS RRH Vienna / Partner / Head of IP;
Dr. Igor Gliha / Law Faculty of University of Zagreb / Professor;
Dr. Ivana Kunda / Law Faculty of University of Rijeka / Assistant Professor;
Dr. Iza Razija Mešević / Law Faculty of University of Sarajevo / Assistant Professor;
Dr. Jadranka Dabovik - Anstasovska / Law Faculty Iustinian I / University Ss. Cyril and Methodius Skopje;
Dr. Martina Repas / Law Faculty of University of Maribor / Associate Professor;
Dr. Neda Zdraveva / Law Faculty Iustinian I / University Ss. Cyril and Methodius Skopje / Assistant Professor;
Dr. Romana Matanovac Vučković / Law Faculty of University of Zagreb / Assistant Professor;
Dr. Silke von Lewinski / MPI for Innovation and Competition) / Senior Research Fellow; Franklin Pierce /
Center for IP / Uni of NH / Adj Professor;
Dr. Siniša Varga / Law Faculty of University of Kragujevac / Associate Professor;
Dr. Slobodan Marković / Law Faculty of University of Belgrade / Professor;
PD Dr. Thomas Jaeger, LL.M. (K.U. Leuven) / Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition / Senior
Research Fellow; Leibniz University Hanover / Substitute Chair in Labor, Company and Civil Law;
Dr. Zhaklina Peto / Law Faculty of University of Tirana / Associate Professor;
Oltion Spiro / Loloci and Associates Tirana;
Robert Kordić / CMS RRH Sarajevo / Senior Legal Adviser;

�THE CONTRIBUTORS BY FIELD AND REGIONS
Contributors (EU Challenges):
Trademarks (Dr. Egon Engin-Deniz / CMS RRH Vienna / Partner / Head of IP), Patents
(Dr. Thomas Jaeger / MPI for Innovation and Competition and Dr. Christopher Heath /
European Patent Office / Member of Board of Appeal Legal Board of Appeal) and Collective
copyright management (Dr. Silke von Lewinski / MPI for Innovation and Competition)
Contributors (Regional Challenges):
Collective copyright management (Slovenia: Dr. Martina Repas / Law Faculty of University of
Maribor, Associate Professor; Croatia: Dr. Igor Gliha / Law Faculty of University of
Zagreb/Professor; Bosnia and Herzegovina: Dr. Iza Razija Mešević / Law Faculty of University of
Sarajevo/ Assistant Professor; Serbia: Dr. Dušan Popović / Law Faculty of University of
Belgrade/Associate Professor; Macedonia: Dr. Jadranka Dabovik- Anstasovska (Professor) and
Dr. Neda Zdraveva (Assistant Professor)/Law Faculty Iustinian I/University Ss. Cyril and Methodius Skopje: Montenegro: Dr. Draginja Vuksanović / Law Faculty of University of
Podgorica/Assistant Professor and Albania: Dr. Zhaklina Peto / Law Faculty of University of
Tirana/Associate Professor and Oltion Spiro / Loloci and Associates Tirana).
Trademarks (Slovenia: Aleš Oražem / Intellectual Property Office of Republic of Slovenia/Head of
TM Division; Croatia: Dr. Romana Matanovac / Law Faculty of University of Zagreb/Assistant
Professor; Bosnia and Herzegovina: Dr. Iza Razija Mešević / Law Faculty of University of
Sarajevo/ Assistant Professor; Serbia: Dr. Siniša Varga / Law Faculty of University of
Kragujevac/Associate Professor; Macedonia: Dr. Jadranka Dabovik - Anstasovska (Professor) and
Dr. Neda Zdraveva (Assistant Professor)/Law Faculty Iustinian I/University Ss. Cyril and Methodius Skopje: Montenegro: Dr. Draginja Vuksanović / Law Faculty of University of
Podgorica/Assistant Professor and Albania: Dr. Zhaklina Peto / Law Faculty of University of
Tirana/Associate Professor and Oltion Spiro / Loloci and Associates Tirana).
Patents (Slovenia: Robert Kordić / CMS RRH Sarajevo/Senior Legal Adviser; Croatia: Dr. Ivana
Kunda / Law Faculty of University of Rijeka/Assistant Professor; Bosnia and Herzegovina: Robert
Kordić / CMS RRH Sarajevo/Senior Legal Adviser Serbia: Dr. Slobodan Marković / Law Faculty
of University of Belgrade/Professor; Macedonia: Dr. Jadranka Dabovik- Anstasovska (Professor)
and Dr. Neda Zdraveva (Assistant Professor)/Law Faculty Iustinian I/University Ss. Cyril and
Methodius Skopje: Montenegro: Dr. Draginja Vuksanović / Law Faculty of University of
Podgorica/Assistant Professor and Albania: Dr. Zhaklina Peto / Law Faculty of University of
Tirana/Associate Professor and Oltion Spiro / Loloci and Associates Tirana.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="1158">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/f10eb6997244ccece7efbcd9a99a61e5.docx</src>
        <authentication>23063960c2915ad7def4927718f7bdc9</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8197">
                <text>2982</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8198">
                <text>Uvodna riječ urednika specijalnog izdanja 2/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8199">
                <text>MEŠEVIĆ, Iza Razija</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8200">
                <text>Intellectual property represents a �eld of law that has its �nger on the pulse of time and  current developments in science, technology, art, politics and economy in almost an unprecedented  manner. As a consequence, the legislation and practice in this area �nd themselves in a constant  endeavor of o�ering adequate response and adapting to these changing circumstances and challenges.  �e complexity and sensitivity of the nature of this �eld, also from a legal and political point of view,  makes this task even more demanding.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8201">
                <text>Centar za društvena istraživanja Internacionalnog Burc univerziteta</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8202">
                <text>2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8203">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8204">
                <text>ISSN 2303-5706     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="59">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General),K Law (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
