<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=294&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-06-27T06:09:57+01:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>294</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>3494</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="2224" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3278">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/1327021b5697df833a10afa547321a57.pdf</src>
        <authentication>dc82e2123e8376f815988f68ba64e329</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="18013">
                    <text>3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

The Investigation On Sustainability Of Total Quality Management In Higher Education
Through Deming’s Pdca Cycle

Göktaş Pinar, Çetinceli Esra
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
Isparta Meslek Yüksekokulu,Isparta Türkiye
E-mails: pinargoktas@sdu.edu.tr,esracetinceli@sdu.edu.tr

Abstract
Total Quality Management (TQM) is an approach that seeks to improve quality and
performance which will meet or exceed customer expectations. This can be achieved by
integrating all quality-related functions and processes throughout the organizations. Total
Quality Management (TQM) is an integrated organizational effort designed to improve
quality at every level. In a TQM effort, participation of all members of an organization is
very important about sustainability. The term sustainability has become popular in policyoriented research as an expression of what public policies ought to achieve. According to
Brundtland, sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present
without compromising the needs of future generations to meet their own needs. Sustainability
management, the ability to direct the course of a company, community, organization, or
country in ways that restore and enhance all forms of capital (human, natural, manufactured,
and financial) to generate stakeholder value and contribute to the well-being of current and
future generations. TQM as a management system could be expanded to include components
of sustainability.
The methods for implementing this approach come from the teachings of such quality leaders
as Philip B. Crosby, W. Edwards Deming, Armand V. Feigenbaum, Kaoru Ishikawa and
Joseph M. Juran. For example W. Edwards Deming in the 1950's proposed that business
processes should be analyzed and measured to identify sources of variations that cause
products to deviate from customer requirements. Deming created a (rather oversimplified)
diagram to illustrate this continuous process, commonly known as the PDCA cycle for Plan,
Do, Check, Act.
In higher education, this study is aimed that offering sustainability of quality education
among the most important goals for university strives to achieve. Moreover the purpose of
this study is to increase the degree of quality awareness, practice, and appreciation of using
PDCA cycle in higher education. As a result, in this study it is mentioned about relationship
between sustainability of total quality management in higher education using by PDCA cycle
technique.

114

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

Keywords: Total Quality Management, PDCA Cycle, Sustainability, Sustainability
Management, Higher Education

1.DEFINING OF QUALITY, TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, DEMING CYCLE
AND SUSTAINABILITY

The concept of "quality" has been contemplated throughout history and continues to be a
topic of intense interest today. Quality presently is addressed in numerous academic and trade
publications, by the media, and in training seminars; it is perhaps the most frequently
repeated man-tra among managers and executives in contemporary organizations. In a recent
survey, executives ranked the improvement of service and product quality as the most critical
challenge facing U.S. businesses (Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., &amp; Berry, L. L. 1990.).
Quality has been described as "the single most important force leading to the economic
growth of companies in international markets"( Feigenbaum, A. V. 1982)
“TQM is a structured attempt to re-focus the organisation’s behaviour, planning and working
practices towards a culture which is employee driven, problem solving, stakeholder oriented,
values integrity, and open and fear free. Furthermore, the organisation’s business practices
are based on seeking continuous improvement, the devolution of decision making, the
removal of functional barriers, the eradication of sources of error, teamwork, honesty, and
fact-based decision making”(Ghobadian and Gallear, 1996)
TQM is a management system consisting of values, methodologies and tools aimed at
satisfying or preferably exceeding the needs and expectations of the customers with a reduced
amount of resources. (Bergman &amp; Klefsjö, 2003).
The founders of modern quality management and organization excellence - Crosby, Demings
and Juran among others - considered ethics, principles and respect for people as key
principles. For example, Crosby (1986) stated that: ‘‘the organizations will prosper only
when all employees feel the same way and when neither customers nor employees will be
hassled’’. Deming’s (1986) 14 points highlighted the ‘‘driving out of fear’’. He advocated an
organizational climate where dealings between managers, employees and customers were
conducted on an ethical basis. ( Crosby, P. (1986)

1.1.Deming Key Principles
1."Create constancy of purpose towards improvement". Replace short-term reaction with
long-term
planning.
2."Adopt the new philosophy". The implication is that management should actually adopt his
philosophy,
rather
than
merely
expect
the
workforce
to
do
so.
3."Cease dependence on inspection". If variation is reduced, there is no need to inspect
manufactured
items
for
defects,
because
there
won't
be
any.
4."Move towards a single supplier for any one item." Multiple suppliers mean variation
115

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

between
feedstocks.
5."Improve constantly and forever". Constantly strive to reduce variation.
6."Institute training on the job". If people are inadequately trained, they will not all work the
same
way,
and
this
will
introduce
variation.
7."Institute leadership". Deming makes a distinction between leadership and mere
supervision.
The
latter
is
quotaand
target-based.
8."Drive out fear". Deming sees management by fear as counter- productive in the long term,
because it prevents workers from acting in the organisation's best interests.
9."Break down barriers between departments". Another idea central to TQM is the concept of
the 'internal customer', that each department serves not the management, but the other
departments
that
use
its
outputs.
10."Eliminate slogans". Another central TQM idea is that it's not people who make most
mistakes - it's the process they are working within. Harassing the workforce without
improving
the
processes
they
use
is
counter-productive.
11."Eliminate management by objectives". Deming saw production targets as encouraging
the
delivery
of
poor-quality
goods.
12."Remove barriers to pride of workmanship". Many of the other problems outlined reduce
worker
satisfaction.
13."Institute
education
and
self-improvement".
14."The transformation is everyone's job".
The Deming Cycle
W. Edwards Deming in the 1950's proposed that business processes should be analyzed and
measured to identify sources of variations that cause products to deviate from customer
requirements. He recommended that business processes be placed in a continuous feedback
loop so that managers can identify and change the parts of the process that need
improvements. As a teacher, Deming created a (rather oversimplified) diagram to illustrate
this continuous process, commonly known as the PDCA cycle for Plan, Do, Check, Act:

PLAN: Design or revise business process components to improve results
DO: Implement the plan and measure its performance
CHECK: Assess the measurements and report the results to decision makers
ACT: Decide on changes needed to improve the process ( Tague, 2005)
Deming's PDCA cycle can be illustrated as follows:
Deming's focus was on industrial production processes, and the level of improvements he
sought were on the level of production. In the modern post-industrial company, these kinds of
improvements are still needed but the real performance drivers often occur on the level of
business strategy. Strategic deployment is another process, but it has relatively longer-term
variations because large companies cannot change as rapidly as small business units. Still,
strategic initiatives can and should be placed in a feedback loop, complete with
116

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

measurements and planning linked in a PDCA cycle. To illustrate the relationship of business
unit processes to strategic processes, we may construct two nested PDCA cycles:

Figure 1: PDCA Cycle
This 'wheel within a wheel' describes the relationship between strategic management and
business unit management in a large company. There are actually several separate business
units, of course, each with its own set of metrics, goals, targets and initiatives. But this figure
illustrates the idea that the business activities constitute the DO part of the overall strategic
effort. ( Tague, 2005)
1.2.Definition of Sustainability
According to Brundtland (1987): This is the most commonly quoted definition and it aims to
be more comprehensive than most: Sustainable development is development that meets the
needs of the present without compromising the needs of future generations to meet their own
needs.It contains within it two key concepts: The concepts of needs, in particular the essential
needs of the worlds poor, to which overriding priority should be given, and: The idea of
limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the environments
ability to meet present and future needs.

2.SUSTAINABILITY OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER
EDUCATION
In this study at first, factors of quality in higher education are determined. These
factors are; students, lecturers, management, physical conditions, social life on campus,
career planning and shareholders. To improve quality in higher education, it can be used
PDCA cycle. In this context when PDCA cycle is analysed, the first stage is plan. In this
stage:
Plan: At first, quality improving team are created and then sub-quality improving
team are created. To improve each factors of quality in higher education, the following are
planned.




117

Students: incresasing the success, socialization and motivation
Lecturers: increasing job satisfaction and institutional commitment, supporting
(Project, study..)
Physical Conditions: tracking technology, improving quality life in campus, studies
for students with disabilities (on-campus transportation, row, lift...)

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo






Management: supporting projects and studies, increasing motivation of personnel and
students
Social Life on Campus: increasing sports activities and artistic works (theatre,
concert…) increasing the activity of club works.
Career Planning: raiseing awareness of students about career planning, leading to
students
Shareholders: the creation of public and private sector cooperation, meeting of
students and industry managers with career days, sectoral promotion, providing
internship opportunities.

When this study is applied, in the stage of “DO”; the above mentioned plans are carried out,
in the stage of “CHECK”; plans and actualized are compared, in the stage of “ACT” as a
result of comparison,the necessary arrangements will be made.

3.CONCLUSION
In this study, to improve quality in higher education, with Deming’s PDCA cycle, sustainable
total quality management in higher education is aimed. Deming’s PDCA cycle has four
stages. These are “Plan”, “Do”, “Check” and “Act”. When all phases occurs, their
sustainability will be provided by making the necessary changes in future periods. So,
students, lecturers, physical conditions, management, social life on campus, career planning
and shareholders such factors’ quality will be increased. In this context, university’s quality
standard will be increased and it will contribute to positive image of university. This study
which is fulfilled the stage of “Plan” (Deming’s PDCA cycle), in the future period will be
able to improve in terms of the other stages Deming’

REFERENCES
Bergman, B. &amp; Klefsjö, B. (2003), Quality From Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction,
Second edition, Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Crosby, P. (1986), Quality Without Tears: The Art of Hassle Free Management, McGrawHill, NY.
Deming, W.E. (1986), Out of The Crisis, MIT Press, NY.
Ghobadian and Gallear, (1996). Ghobadian, A and Gallear, D. (1996) “Total Quality
Management in SMEs”, OMEGA -International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 24.
Feigenbaum, A. V. (1982) , Quality and Business Growth Today. Quality Progress.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L. and Zeithaml, V.A. (1990), An Empirical Examination of
Relationships in an Extended Service Quality Model, Marketing Science Institute,
Cambridge, MA.
Tague, N.R. (2005), The Quality Toolbox, Second Edition

118

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18007">
                <text>1104</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18008">
                <text>The Investigation On Sustainability Of Total Quality Management In Higher Education  Through Deming’s Pdca Cycle</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18009">
                <text>Göktaş, Pinar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18010">
                <text>Total Quality Management (TQM) is an approach that seeks to improve quality and  performance which will meet or exceed customer expectations. This can be achieved by  integrating all quality-related functions and processes throughout the organizations. Total  Quality Management (TQM) is an integrated organizational effort designed to improve  quality at every level. In a TQM effort, participation of all members of an organization is  very important about sustainability. The term sustainability has become popular in policyoriented  research as an expression of what public policies ought to achieve. According to  Brundtland, sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present  without compromising the needs of future generations to meet their own needs. Sustainability  management, the ability to direct the course of a company, community, organization, or  country in ways that restore and enhance all forms of capital (human, natural, manufactured,  and financial) to generate stakeholder value and contribute to the well-being of current and  future generations. TQM as a management system could be expanded to include components  of sustainability.  The methods for implementing this approach come from the teachings of such quality leaders  as Philip B. Crosby, W. Edwards Deming, Armand V. Feigenbaum, Kaoru Ishikawa and  Joseph M. Juran. For example W. Edwards Deming in the 1950's proposed that business  processes should be analyzed and measured to identify sources of variations that cause  products to deviate from customer requirements. Deming created a (rather oversimplified)  diagram to illustrate this continuous process, commonly known as the PDCA cycle for Plan,  Do, Check, Act.  In higher education, this study is aimed that offering sustainability of quality education  among the most important goals for university strives to achieve. Moreover the purpose of  this study is to increase the degree of quality awareness, practice, and appreciation of using  PDCA cycle in higher education. As a result, in this study it is mentioned about relationship  between sustainability of total quality management in higher education using by PDCA cycle  technique.Keywords: Total Quality Management, PDCA Cycle, Sustainability, Sustainability  Management, Higher Education</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18011">
                <text>2012-05-31</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18012">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2188" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3242">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/5427448bffd717be7974c7876afa1899.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1b0a75efcd6f3efe63f1a535ce7a7971</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="17761">
                    <text>3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

The IPARD Programme in the context of European Union
Rural development funds
Dilek Memişoğlu1,Ayşe Durgun2, Sibel Yegül2
1Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Public Administration
Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey
2Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics
Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey
E –mails: dilekmemisoglu@sdu.edu.tr,aysedurgun@sdu.edu.tr,sibelyegül@yahoo.com
Abstract
One of the pre-accession funds which provided by the European Union is IPARD (Instrument
for Pre-Accession Assistance-IPA). With this fund, it is aimed that include in some of the
priorities for the adaptation of the agricultural sector and rural areas and contribute to the
solution of problems. Thus, it is aimed people in rural areas attain sustainable business and
living conditions their own region. In this context, it is given priority such as market
efficiency, improving of quality and health standards, and creation of new employment
opportunities in rural and rural areas in the supported activities.
At this study primarily, it will be focused on the importance of rural development. Later, it
will be given information about funds in order to promote rural development by the European
Union. It will be especially focused on IPARD funds and the implementation of IPARD in
Turkey will be discussed.
Keywords: European Union, Rural Development, IPARD Programme, Turkey.
1. INTRODUCTION

275

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

Looking at the geography of Turkey in general, the width of rural areas attracts attention.
Therefore, it is possible to say that rural areas with a particular population have the potential
of economic and human resources which will contribute to the strengthening of the country
development. From this point, consider the potential and eliminate the deficiencies, make
new investments and services in rural areas, are important for sustainable development. In
fact, rural development today is considered not only in the terms of agricultural sector but
also in the context of regional development.
European Union also supports rural development through various funds in the region
countries. These supports aimed the sustainable development of rural areas in their region by
taking into consideration country needs, priorities and the local conditions in a manner
consistent with urban areas.
2. Rural Development in Development Process
The content of the term “development”, frequently used for underdeveloped countries, can
not only be defined as the increase in per capita income but it also has to involve the
development in all spheres of the economy as well as the reformation and modernization of
the economic and socio-cultural structure of the society. Assuming a vital significance for the
underdeveloped countries to be able to catch up with the developed ones, the term
“development” is a process which may come out both in stable and unstable terms. Within
this process, the key elements of the development can be listed as the increase in per capita
income as well as the grow of the share of the industry and service sectors in national income
and export through modification of the frequency and amount of the production factors.
(Han and Kaya; 2008:2).
The term “development”, having gained a significant importance particularly following the
Second World War and often cited in the literature, has been discussed in various studies
under several other headings like economic development, rural development, sustainable
development, etc. Among those complementary themes, rural development shall be discussed
in our study.
The rural area is plainly defined as the areas of land that are not urbanized. In broader terms,
it is the area of land where social and economic activities are largely dependent on the use of
the natural resources; the economic, social and cultural development processes move slowly;
the traditional values hold direct influence in daily life; face-to-face interaction preserves its
priority, the impact of the technological advancements on daily routines and production takes
longer to appear; the infrastructure services are insufficient and the population density is
lower than the urban areas. (DPT, 2000:2)
Rural areas remain behind the urban areas in terms of social or economic opportunities. The
structural, social and cultural reforms executed to ameliorate the living conditions of such
areas can be defined as the rural development. (Uzunpınar, 2008:11). In short, every activity
conducted in order to promote the rural life may mean rural development. However; for the
276

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

rural development activities to accomplish, in the first instance a sense of such need to
maintain a certain standard of living is to be raised among those who dwell in the rural areas
and earn their keep from farming or similar other rural area occupations; and then the
economic, social and cultural development of those communities are to be promoted in a
democratic manner by ensuring them with moral and material support. (Çandar, 2009:82)
Within this framework, the essence of the rural development is regarded as a political policy
that intends to ensure an optimum balance among social, cultural and economic differences
between the rural and urban; to improve the rural population on-site as well as to settle the
immigration and recruitment issues on-site. (Gülçubuk, 2002:1).
When viewed from this aspect, we may esteem that the rural development policies in Turkey
hold the similar objectives. That is to say, the relevant objective is mentioned in national rural
development statement as follows: “to make use of local and potential resources, to improve
and to sustain the working and living conditions of the rural areas on-site in harmony with the
urban areas in reliance on the protection of the natural and cultural assets.” (DPT, 2006:10).
3. Rural Development Policies in Turkey
Countries differ in their levels of development due to their geopolitical positions as well as
their proximity to or distance from the natural resources. Beside these basic variables, there
are plenty other factors having impact on the development of the countries. The
underdeveloped countries involve people who mostly engage in farming and dwell in rural
areas and whose economic activities, living standards, education levels as well as health
services fall behind compared to those in developed countries. In this respect, the
development of the rural areas holds a vital significance for the developing countries.
That a considerable amount of population dwell in the rural areas worldwide concerns not
only underdeveloped countries but also developed countries since the problems that the
people in rural areas encounter, the gap in level of income between the urban and rural, the
unfair distribution of income, sustainable use of the natural resources as well as the protection
of the environment are regarded as international issues. Abovementioned case lays stress on
the strategic significance of rural development for both developed and underdeveloped
countries. Consequently, alternative policies regarding the rural development have been
brought up recently.
Turkey has been adopting a set of scheduled development principles so as to conduct an
effective and rational socio-economic development through its progress plans since 1963.
The rural development policies were first brought up by Five Year Plans which sought for the
solutions to the problems of the rural areas. Within the 1st Five Year Progress Plan (19631967), the development of the society was perceived as rural development and “model
village” projects were put into practice. Within the 2nd Five Year Progress Plan (1968-1972),
the issues of urbanization, modernization in agriculture and industrialization were discussed.
The 3rd Five Year Progress Plan (1973-1977) marked the “Central Village” and “Agricultural
277

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

City” projects. Within the 4th Five Year Progress Plan (1979-1983), land reform was added
to the agenda while the main objective was set as the industrialization. “Leader Farmer” and
“GAP” projects were put into effect in the 5th Five Year Progress Plan. The final period of
the 6th plan and the initial period of the 7th plan marked the Customs Union Agreement.
Within the 8th Five Year Progress Plan, Rural Development Special Commission Report
discussing the modern village and agriculture approach as well as the increase in the income
and recruitment was issued. The 9th Progress Plan, issued for a period of seven years (20072013) considering The European Union Accession Period, marked The Action Plan for Rural
Development in accordance with The National Rural Development Strategy. The plan
encapsulates not only the agricultural and regional policies regarding rural development but
also the education, health, social security, trade and industry, recruitment, population, culture,
urbanization, energy, tourism as well as environment. (Işık and Baysal, 2011:166).
As said above, various policies or projects regarding the rural development have been
conducted in the scheduled period. However, these have failed to produce effective
outcomes. The rural development has gained more importance and considerably more efforts
have been put together with The European Union Accession Period.
4. Rural Development Policies of the European Union for the Candidate Countries and
Turkey
4.1. Rural Development Policies of the European Union and the Rural Development
Funds
Agriculture and rural development is still one of the most complex, sensitive and critical
issues in the enlargement conditions of European Union. Because agriculture has a significant
size (share of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), high number of the population active in
agriculture) and has structural deficiencies (subsistence and semi-subsistence farming). In the
enlargement process the European Commission plays a key role and it is closely associated in
the accession process including negotiations. Commission experts in the field of agriculture
and rural development provide assistance and guidance to candidate and potential candidate
countries preparing for the Common Agricultural Policy and Rural Development (European
Commission, 2012a).
In the 1950s the European Union (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) came up with the
candidate countries in the implementation of rural development policies. CAP includes all of
the policies pursued for the development of agriculture in order to bring the same level
between members of different structure and regulation of agricultural markets of member
countries in the agricultural sector. Initially, this application contains only the agricultural
policies over time, other issues concerning rural areas (tourism, handicrafts, etc.) expanded to
cover. Through the Common Agricultural Policy various programs have been developed to
be brought into line particularly promote rural development and agricultural policies of
candidate countries with the EU. In accordance with the CAP, various programs have been
278

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

developed to be bring into line agricultural policies of candidate countries with the EU and to
support the rural development of candidate countries. Special Accession Programme for
Agriculture and Rural Development (SAPARD) is one the programme that covers the years
2000–2006 and seeks to promote rural development in candidate countries. Instrument for
Pre-Accession Assistance for Rural Development (IPARD) programme is the other one that
covers 2007–2013 and still being implemented (Işık and Baysal, 2011: 167).
Special Accession Programme For Agriculture And Rural Development (SAPARD) is one
of the special European Union (EU) programmes started in June 1998. It is aimed to manage
problems in agriculture and rural development for enhancing competitiveness in reference to
the EU market and implementation of EU regulations in candidate countries. SAPARD
programme can be implemented until the candidate countries join to the EU (Perić, Odobaša,
and Konjić, 2009: 774).
The SAPARD programme aims at (Perić, Odobaša, and Konjić, 2009: 775):
- Harmonization with EU legislature in agriculture
- Preparation in common agricultural policy (CAP)
- Investing in agricultural land
- Improvement of soil quality
- Afforestation of agricultural areas
- Supporting the manufacturers of wood products,
- Improving the quality of arable land and parcelling
- Land-ownership records
- Professional education and training
- Agricultural and fishery products processing and marketing building up.
It is mentioned that the users of the programme are the producers, not the state. “The
agriculture market and structural aid authority has been structured to performing the
SAPARD programme of the Agency. It is the Agency that fulfills the function of SAPARD
implementation starting from instruments preparation and inviting applications, project
awarding, funding and field control9. SAPARD funding is targeted and grant-in-aid” (Perić,
Odobaša, and Konjić, 2009: 774).
4.2. Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA)
The European Union's rural development policy in the new period 2007–2013, consists of
three axes. These are competitive, land management and rural development axes.
Competition axis aims to support human resources (especially young farmers) and to increase
physical capacity, agricultural products and production capacity. The axis of land
279

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

management purposes to ensure sustainable use of agricultural land and forest areas. And the
rural development axis pursues goals such as improving the quality of life and economic
diversity and rising and training is the acquisition of skills. (EC, 2008: 17).
The EU introduces new conditions for financing agriculture and rural development both for
the member states and candidate countries by the new budget period 2007-2013. According
to this, a new programme called as Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), will
replace the Polognie et Hungrie Assistance Pour la Restructuration Economique (PHARE),
Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA), Special Accession Programme
For
Agriculture And Rural Development (SPARD), Community Assistance for
Reconstruction Development and Stabilisation (CARDS) programmes and the Turkey preaccession instrument (Perić, Odobaša, and Konjić, 2009: 776). IPA replaces all the preaccession instruments and unifies them into a single framework. It also supports all the
candidate and potential candidate countries with a clear and easy pre-accession aim on all
categories. IPA has five components and it provides targeted and effective assistance for each
country according to its needs and evolution by these components (European Commission,
2010).
The Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) is the financial instrument for the
European Union (EU) pre-accession process for the period 2007-2013. The IPA is intended
as a flexible instrument. So it provides assistance to beneficiary countries according to their
progress and their needs through the Commission’s evaluations and strategy papers. The
beneficiary countries are divided into two categories, depending on their status. One of them
is candidate countries and these are under accession process. And the other one is potential
candidate countries and these are under the stabilization and association process. Candidate
countries are the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Croatia and Turkey (Annex I to
the Regulation). Potential candidate countries are defined as Albania, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Iceland, Montenegro, and Serbia including Kosovo (Annex II to the
Regulation) (European Commission, 2012b).
The IPA’s main aim is to support institution-building and the rule of law, human rights,
including the fundamental freedoms, minority rights, gender equality and non-discrimination,
both administrative and economic reforms, economic and social development, reconciliation
and reconstruction, and regional and cross-border cooperation. To achieve targeted, effective
and coherent action, the IPA is made up of five components (European Commission, 2012b).
Each component has priorities defined according to the needs of the beneficiary countries
(European Commission, 2012c):
1. Transition Assistance and Institution Building: It provides financing for institutionbuilding and associated investments. It supports measures to drive stabilization and the
transition to a democratic society and market economy. This component is open to all
candidates and potential candidates.

280

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

2. Cross-Border Cooperation: It supports cross-border cooperation between candidates and
potential candidates and with EU Member States. It may also fund participation in
transnational cooperation programmes (under the Structural Funds) and Sea Basin
programmes (under the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument or ENPI). This
component is open to all candidates and potential candidates.
3. Regional Development: It finances investments and associated technical assistance in areas
such as transport, environment and economic cohesion. It is open to candidate countries only.
4. Human Resources Development: It aims to strengthen human capital through education
and training and to help combat exclusion. It is open to candidate countries only.
5. Rural Development: It contributes to sustainable rural development. It provides assistance
for the restructuring of agriculture and its adaptation to EU standards in the areas of
environmental protection, public health, animal and plant health, animal welfare and
occupational safety. It is open to candidate countries only.
In this process candidate countries and potential candidates are separated from each other.
Because candidate countries are prepared for full implementation of the Community acquis at
the time of accession. On the other hand potential candidate countries shall benefit from
support to progressively align themselves to the Community acquis. Beside this, potential
candidates may utilize last three components under the framework of the first component. It
can be said that the difference is especially in the implementation way of these measures.
Because beneficiary countries must manage the Community funds in a decentralized way
preparing for the implementation of the structural and agricultural funds in the context of the
three components (European Commission, 2012b).
It is not possible to talk about a competition environment for countries while using funds. The
envelope has been allocated to beneficiaries according to the needs of each country. One of
the main objectives of IPA is to strengthen the administrative capacity of all beneficiary
countries. Hence beneficiaries will be able to receive support to increase the administrative
capacity and establish the correct management structures necessary to take responsibility of
the management of assistance under the transition assistance and institution building
component. For candidate countries, this will then allow measures relating to regional, human
resources and regional development to be undertaken through the relevant components
(which are designed to prepare for structural funds and hence require such management
structures). For potential candidates, such development will be essential preparation for
candidate status (European Commission, 2010).
IPA should ensure a higher level of coherence and co-ordination of EU Assistance and better
preparation for Structural, Cohesion and Rural development Funds through progressive
emulation of EU funds rules. The financial envelope allocated for the period 2007–2013 is
10.2 billion Euros (at 2004 prices) (Davis, 2007: 7). Potential beneficiaries of the IPA are the
local self-government units, farmings and other natural or legal persons depending on priority
measures (Perić, Odobaša, and Konjić, 2009: 776).
281

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

It is possible to say that IPA has different management and implementation conditions. The
IPA is based on strategic multi-annual planning. It is formed in agreement with the broad
political guidelines set out in the Commission's enlargement package, which now contains a
Multi-annual Indicative Financial Framework (MIFF). The MIFF constitutes the reference
framework of the multi-annual indicative planning documents which are composing the
strategic planning. Multi-annual indicative planning documents are created for each
beneficiary country and contain the main intervention areas envisaged for that country.
Annual or multi-annual programmes depend on the component and are based on the
indicative planning documents and adopted by the Commission. The annual or multi-annual
programmes are implemented by centralized, decentralized or shared management methods
(European Commission, 2012b).
Assistance through IPA can take the following forms (European Commission, 2012c):
• Investment, procurement, contracts or subsidies
• Administrative cooperation, involving experts sent from Member States (e.g. twinning)
• Action by the EU in the interest of the beneficiary country
• Measures to support the implementation process and programme management
• Budget support (granted exceptionally and subject to supervision)
4.3. Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance for Rural Development (IPARD)
IPARD differs from the other components of the IPA. According to this, IPARD has
devolved the control of financial resources completely to the candidate countries. Thus, the
points such as monitoring of national accreditation process and the accredited organization,
transferring of the fund management to IPARD agency, which has been accredited by the
Commission and controlling of the IPARD agency after application (ex-post) are stand out.
(European Commission, 2007). As mentioned before, IPARD programme exposes an easier
and simple structure than SAPARD. For example, SAPARD includes 15 measures, but
IPARD contains 9 measures in 3 axes (Turhan and Akdağ, 2006).
These axes include the following measures (Davis, J., 2007: 7-8):
Priority Axis 1-Improving market efficiency and implementing Community standards
• Investments in farms to restructure and upgrade to the EU standards;
• Supporting setting up of Producer groups
• Investments in processing and marketing of agriculture and fishery products to restructure
and upgrade to the EU standards
Priority Axis 2-Preparatory actions for implantation of the agri-environmental measures and
Leader
• Preparation to implement actions designed to improve the environment and the country side
282

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

• Preparation of local private-public partnerships to implement local development strategies
Priority Axis 3-Development of rural economy
• Improving and developing rural infrastructure;
• Development and diversification of rural economic activities;
• Improvement of training
• Technical assistance
The main purpose of the IPARD is to contribute to the implementation of the acquis related
to the EU Common Agricultural Policy and to determine some priorities and to contribute to
the solution of problems in the candidate countries. Accordingly it is aimed to give priority to
market efficiency, quality and improving health standards and the creation of new
employment opportunities in rural areas (Bakırcı, 2009: 59).
IPARD entrusts the financial control of all funds to the candidate country and brings an
improved decentralized implementation system. In this respect, it is possible to say that a
different application and scheduling mechanism is exhibited by IPARD and IPARD differs
from the other components of IPA. Accordingly, the candidate country primarily needs to
prepare a Rural Development Plan that must be approved by the Commission. In addition, a
Rural Development Agency must be built and must be accredited in the candidate countries
for implementation (Yıldız and Akdağ, 2006: 35).
4.3.1. IPARD Programme of Turkey
IPA made up of five components and as a candidate country Turkey can beneficiary from all
the components of IPA and also IPARD. IPARD is the fifth component of the IPA and
includes rural development supports. Following initiation of negotiations, Turkey has started
to work to fulfill the prerequisites. In this respect, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
Affairs Department of Strategy Development has prepared the IPARD Programme by
negotiating with relevant departments of the European Commission. Prepared IPARD
Programme has accepted by the European Commission Rural Development Committee by
discussing (Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, 2008).
IPARD plan focused on issues such as, the country's overall socio-economic characteristics
and current status, a detailed analysis of the agricultural sector, the economic activities in
rural areas, human resources and regional differences, the country's agricultural policies,
implemented before the development plans, goals and strategies and national support.
However the part that shows what areas, which sectors and to whom the EU funds will be
transferred under which conditions is the most important part of the programme and called as
measures or technical jobs. The selected measures for the first level of programme includes
following (Support Institution of Agriculture and Rural Development, 2010: 167):
283

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

• Investments for restructuring of agricultural businesses and the delivery to the Community
standards
• Investments for to restructure processing and marketing of agricultural and fishery products
and the delivery to the Community standards
• Investments for diversification and the development of rural economic activities
In this context, the amount of funds allocated to Turkey under the rural development
component of the IPA has determined total 660.9 million Euros between the years of 20072012 (European Commission, 2011).
The IPARD programme for Turkey is in line with the Multi-annual Indicative Planning
Document (MIPD) between the years of 2007 - 2009 as well as the enlargement package and
other strategic documents on the pre-accession process of Turkey. The main policy objectives
are to contribute to the modernization of the agricultural sector (including processing)
through targeted investments while at the same time encouraging the improvement of EU
acquis related food safety, veterinary, phytosanitary, environmental or other standards as
specified in the Enlargement Package and to contribute to the sustainable development of
rural areas (Europa, 2007).
There are 3 overall aims of IPARD programme in the country. First one is, modernization of
the agricultural production and processing sectors through increasing efficiency and
competitiveness and implementation of Community standards. Second one is capacitybuilding and preparatory actions for the implementation of agri-environmental measures and
the LEADER method. And the last one is, development and diversification of the rural
economy, increase of quality of life and attractiveness of the rural areas, counteracting rural
out-migration (Europa, 2007).
On the other hand there 3 axes of IPARD programme in Turkey. Axis 1 aims to improve
market efficiency and to implement Community standards and it has 154.954.667 million
Euros (73%) public aid for the periods 2007 – 2009. Under Axis 1, three measures will be
implemented as the following (Europa, 2007):
• Investment in agricultural holdings to restructure and to upgrade to Community standards
(40% of the public aid),
• Investment in processing and marketing of agricultural and fishery products to restructure
and upgrade to Community standards (28% of the public aid),
• Support for the setting up of producer groups (5% of the public aid).
Axis 2 purposes to prepare actions for the implementation of agri-environmental measures
and Links between Actions for the Development of Rural Economy (LEADER). The
Programme includes an outline of preparatory actions planned for the implementation of agrienvironmental measures such as erosion control, water resource conservation, biodiversity as
well as for the LEADER method (acquisition of skills, implementation of local development
284

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

strategies, running costs for approved Local Action Groups as well as co-operation projects
between those groups). The measures will be developed in detail and submitted to the Rural
Development Committee for adoption after a capacity-building process including institutionbuilding and training during the period 2010 – 2013 (Europa, 2007).
Ultimately Axis 3 intends to provide development of the rural economy and contains
53.066.667 million Euros (25%) public aid during the period 2007-2009. Under Axis 3 the
diversification and development of rural economic activities will be implemented. The main
priorities of Axis 3 are to contribute to the development of the rural economy, diversify onfarm and off-farm activities, to support the formation of micro enterprises in order to create
new jobs as well as to maintain the existing jobs in rural areas. And the supports through Axis
3 will be provided to (Europa, 2007):
• Diversification and development of on-farm activities (bee keeping and honey production,
medicinal and aromatic plants, ornamental plants production),
• Local product and micro enterprise development,
• Rural tourism,
• Aquaculture.
IPARD implementation which will be implemented through the IPARD programme consists
of two phases. The first stage encompasses the years 2007-2009 and the second stage covers
the years 2010-2013. Various measures are envisaged in the two stages and four sectors have
been defined as priority for IPARD intervention as the following (Ministry of Agriculture and
Rural Affairs, 2008: 177):
• Milk and milk products processing sector,
• Meat and meat products processing sector including poultry
• Fish processing sector
• Fruits &amp; Vegetable processing sector
“The priorities for IPARD intervention in the processing sector are the assistance to the
implementation of EU Acquis - notably related to quality, hygiene and food safety and
veterinary controls, animal welfare, environmental impact and occupational safety – by the
processing industry, as well as the improvement of the efficiency of the processes” (Ministry
of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 2008: 177).
Support Institution of Agriculture and Rural Development is established as an IPARD agency
in accordance with the IPARD program in order to fulfill the program requirements on 4 May
2007. Because the national accreditation process completed positively Support Institution of
Agriculture and Rural Development Central and Provincial Coordinatorships have been
accredited by the National Authorizing Officer on 21 July 2010 (Tarımsal ve Kırsal
Kalkınmayı Destekleme Kurumu, 2010: 18). Up to now in the context of IPARD programme
285

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

five times the call announcements have been made to support businesses willing to invest by
Support Institution of Agriculture and Rural Development.
5. CONCLUSION
In recent years, the EU emerges as one of the actors that support rural development. The EU,
thanks to funds provided for the candidate countries supports rural development in these
countries on one hand and aims to harmonize agricultural policies of these countries with the
EU on the other hand. The IPA is the financial instrument for the EU pre-accession process
for the period 2007-2013. IPA made up of five components and IPARD is the fifth
component of the IPA and includes rural development supports. IPARD programme covers
2007–2013 and still being implemented. As a candidate country Turkey can beneficiary from
all the components of IPA and also IPARD.
The Development Bank of Turkey recorded a total country population of 73.722.000 in 2012.
The rural area population makes up 29% of the total population (21.382.000). The total
number of recruitment in agriculture, industry and service sectors is 22.594.000 while
5.683.000 people engage in agricultural sector making up 39% of the total recruitment. The
figures above mark the significance of the rural development policies for Turkey.
Additionally, the rural development assumes a strategic significance to ensure the regional
development and repair the instabilities among the geographical regions in Turkey.
Through the EU rural development policies and funds and also IPARD programme as a
candidate country, Turkey was a new era in rural development policies. In this new era,
agricultural and rural producers are supported with funds and increasing the efficiency and
the diversity of the product is aimed. Furthermore different methods for achieving rural
development are envisaged. Accordingly, diversification of non-farming income-generating
activities such as tourism and handicrafts has targeted in agricultural and rural areas, where
seasonal unemployment is more than the other places. thereby creating new jobs, increase
income and upgrade living standards of people living in rural area and prevent migration is
intended.
REFERENCES
Bakırcı, M. (2009). AVRUPA Birliği Üyelik Öncesi Destek Fonu’nun (IPA*) Kırsal
Kalkınma Bileşeni (IPARD**), Türkiye’nin Durumu ve Muhtemel Etkileri. Eastern
Geographical Review, 14 (21), 53–78.
Çandar, A. (2009). Yirminci Yüzyılın İkinci Yarısından Günümüze Kırsal Kalkınma
Alanındaki Temel Yaklaşımlar ve Değişimler. Ahmet Saltık Kırsal Kalkınma Paneli,
SÜRKAL - Sürdürülebilir Kırsal ve Kentsel Kalkınma Derneği, Ankara.81-92.

286

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

Davis, J. (2007) Agriculture and Rural Development Challenges in SEE and Turkey with the
View to EU Integration Process.
Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. (2006). Ulusal Kırsal Kalkınma Stratejisi, Ankara.
Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. (2000). Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, Kırsal Kalkınma
Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara.
Europa, (2007). IPA Rural Development (IPARD) Programme for Turkey. [Online]
Available:
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/07/609&amp;format=HTML&amp;a
ged=0&amp;language=EN&amp;guiLanguage=en (April 12, 2012)
European Commission, (2012a). Enlargement of the European Union. [Online] Available:
http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/enlargement/index_en.htm (April 12, 2012)
(European Commission, 2012b). Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA). [Online]
Available:
http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/agriculture/enlargement/e50020_en.htm
2012)

(April

12,

European Commission, (2012c). Instrument for pre-accession assistance (IPA). [Online]
Available:
http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/how-does-it-work/financial-assistance/instrument-preaccession_en.htm (April 12, 2012)
European Commission, (2011). Turkey - Financial Assistance. [Online] Available:
http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/candidate-countries/turkey/financial-assistance/index_en.htm
(April 12, 2012)
European Commission, (2010). Instrument for pre accession assistance "IPA" - Questions
and Answers. [Online] Available:
http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/questions_and_answers/assistance_ipa_en.htm
2012)

(April

12,

Europen Commission, (2008). Fact Sheet EU Rural Development Policy 2007–2013.
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Europen Commission, (2007). Commission Regulation (EC) No 718/2007 of 12 June 2007
Implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 Establishing an Instrument for PreAccession Assistance (IPA). [Online] Available:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:170:0001:0066:EN:PDF
(April 12, 2012)
Gülçubuk, B. (2002). Kırsal Kalkınma Politikaları. [Online] Available:
287

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

www.kirsalcevre.org.tr/_html/tur/yayinlarimiz/dyayinlar/kirsal_kalkinma_politikalari_bulent
g.pdf. (April 10, 2012)
Han, E.&amp; Kaya A. A. (2008). Kalkınma Ekonomisi Teori ve Politika. 6. Baskı, Nobel
Yayınları, Ankara.
Işık, N. &amp; Baysal, D. (2011). Avrupa Birliği’ne Uyum Sürecinde Türkiye’de Kırsal Kalkınma
Politikaları: Genel Bir Değerlendirme. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 12(1), 165–
186.
Kalkınma Bakanlığı. 2012. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Göstergeler. [Online] Available
http://www.dpt.gov.tr/PortalDesign/PortalControls/WebIcerikGosterim.aspx?Enc=83D5A6F
F03C7B4FC5A73E5CFAD2D9676. ( April 05,2012)
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, (2008). Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance
Rural Development (IPARD) Programme (200-2013). [Online] Available:
http://www.tkdk.gov.tr/files/IPARD_Ingilizce.doc (April 12, 2012)
Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, (2008). Türkiye’ nin IPARD Programı Avrupa
Komisyonu Kırsal Kalkınma Komitesi’ nce Kabul Edildi. [Online] Available:
http://www.tarim.gov.tr/Files/KirsalKalkinma/IPARD_Programi_1.htm (April 12, 2012)
Perić, R., Odobaša, R., &amp; Konjić, E. (2009). Financial Measures and Instruments for
Adjustment of Agriculture for EU Accession. Interdisciplinary Management Research V,
771-780.
Support Institution of Agriculture and Rural Development, (2010). Tarım ve Köyişleri
Bakanlığı, IPARD Programı (2007–2013). [Online] Available:
www.tkdk.gov.tr/files/IPARD_Program_son1.doc (January 10, 2012)
Tarımsal ve Kırsal Kalkınmayı Destekleme Kurumu, (2010). Akreditasyon ve Yetki Devri
Süreci Son Durum IPARD İzleme Komitesi 4. Resmi Toplantısı. [Online] Available:
http://www.tarim.gov.tr/Files/duyurular/%C4%B1pard_izleme_komitesi/4.pdf
2012)

(April

12,

Turhan, M.S. &amp; Akdağ, K. (2006). AB Üyeliği Yolunda Kırsal Kalkınma Planı ve Bu Plan
Kapsamında Alınacak Tedbirler. Türktarım Dergisi, 167, 16–19.
Uzunpınar, A. (2008). Katılım Öncesi AB Kırsal Kalkınma Politikası ve Türkiye’de
Uygulanacak IPARD Programı Kapsamında Proje Hazırlama, Değerlendirme ve Seçim
Süreci.
[Online]
Available
http://diabk.tarim.gov.tr/Adnan_UZUNPINAR_AB_Uzmanl%C4%B1k_Tezi_200. (March
25, 2012)

288

�3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo

Yıldız, F. F. &amp; Akdağ, K. (2006). Avrupa Birliği Yapısal Fonları Kapsamında Bölgesel
Kalkınma ile Kırsal Kalkınma Fonlarının Karşılaştırılması. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı
Türktarım Dergisi, 167, 29–37.

Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and Role of Saudi Arabia
Nađa Dreca
International University of Sarajevo,Faculty of Business and Administration
71000, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
E-mails: nadja.dreca@students.ius.edu.ba, nadja_n88@hotmail.com

Abstract
The aim of this research is to explain the OPEC position and the role of Saudi Arabia within
OPEC. Saudi Arabia as the largest producer and country with largest oil reserves of oil attract
many attention and many studies try to explain which role Saudi Arabia plays within OPEC,
is it the role of dominant producer and which strategy Saudi Arabia used during its
membership in order to keep its position and its market share. Saudi Arabia role is to keep the
balance of production within OPEC. Saudi Arabia was explained as swing producer, and in
order to protect itself and its interest because of cheating of other members of OPEC, it was
forced to adopt the strategy tit-for-tat. There is big question of it is good to have dominant
producer, or all of them to be equal.
Keywords: OPEC, Saudi Arabia, Cartel, Oil prices, dominant producer
1. INTRODUCTION
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is the international organization
composed of the twelve member states. These countries mainly depend on the revenues from
oil export. They work together in the coordination of the overall oil price in the world
market. OPEC is by market structure Cartel, which represents intergovernmental
organization. As it is stated in OPEC`s Statute it is an international organization with aim to
influence and maintain the price of oil through the control of production levels and to
generate revenue, which goes towards meeting the development needs of its members. By
289

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17755">
                <text>1176</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17756">
                <text>The IPARD Programme in the context of European Union  Rural development funds</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17757">
                <text>Dilek , Memişoğlu</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17758">
                <text>One of the pre-accession funds which provided by the European Union is IPARD (Instrument  for Pre-Accession Assistance-IPA). With this fund, it is aimed that include in some of the  priorities for the adaptation of the agricultural sector and rural areas and contribute to the  solution of problems. Thus, it is aimed people in rural areas attain sustainable business and  living conditions their own region. In this context, it is given priority such as market  efficiency, improving of quality and health standards, and creation of new employment  opportunities in rural and rural areas in the supported activities.  At this study primarily, it will be focused on the importance of rural development. Later, it  will be given information about funds in order to promote rural development by the European  Union. It will be especially focused on IPARD funds and the implementation of IPARD in  Turkey will be discussed.  Keywords: European Union, Rural Development, IPARD Programme, Turkey.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17759">
                <text>2012-05-31</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17760">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1675" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2334">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/4c67c74304093563e61afa80d5abd12b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>16011ae8036405efb50ddd9f0b65ef7f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="13694">
                    <text>International Conference on Economic and Social Studies, 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

The Knowledge Economy and its Impact on the
Employment and the Employees’ Profile
Kenan Ören
Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
koren25@hotmail.com
Hasan Yüksel
Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
hasanyuksel37@gmail.com
Throughout history, there has been a radical transformation concerning
the developmental stages in the lives of human beings. The first stage that
initiates with the agriculture continues with industry which is the main
turning points in the sociological perspective of work and working life. The
Industrial Revolution that was the sign of transformation from the manual
oriented economy to the machine oriented ones also shifted the
requirements of the human resource capital. The new terms about the
work entered to the literature such as the time, wage, and trade unions,
working conditions, factories and so forth. This event called as
industrialization as different from the period of agriculture isolated the
work and family life from one another. In the third period, the economic,
sociological, and the political procedures resulted in the development as
well as the importance of the knowledge and the knowledge economy.
Today, the knowledge which is the particular indicator of knowing
something and know-how is associated with the welfare and the power.
Those who can produce and utilize the knowledge can compete with the
others easily. Therefore, it can be stated that the knowledge is the main
determinant of current age called as ‘the age of information’. In a way, this
inclination shaped a great many things in the society from the education to
the employment strategies of the nations. Even more, the requirements of
the employees altered unlike those in the industrial period. As an example,
the internationalization of the human capital in terms of their
qualifications, the occurrence of the knowledge workers put a different
point to the employment based strategically approach. Within this
framework, the main aim of the study is to analyze the changing
perspectives of the employment and the employees by referencing to the
information centered society.
Keywords: Knowledge Economy, Knowledge, Knowledge Worker.

187

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2335">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/f5c5cad5927e55fe3914f7e6b2702a50.docx</src>
        <authentication>58505ea4570fd2709f06b7c0cef78830</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2336">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/50c4d1b0b732b981f63b35d73fc1e536.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5e9e712b15c127a05560c033a54855f9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="13695">
                    <text>International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

The Knowledge as the Main Determinant on the Employment and the
Employees‟ Profile
Kenan Ören
Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
koren25@hotmail.com
Hasan Yüksel
Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta
hasanyuksel37@gmail.com

Abstract
Throughout history, there has been a radical transformation concerning the
developmental stages in the lives of human beings. The first stage that initiates with
the agriculture continues with industry which is the main turning points in the
sociological perspective of work and working life. The Industrial Revolution that
was the sign of transformation from the manual oriented economy to the machine
oriented ones also shifted the requirements of the human resource capital. The new
terms about the work entered to the literature such as the time, wage, trade unions,
working conditions, factories and so forth. This event called as industrialization as
different from the period of agriculture isolated the work and family life from one
another. In the third period, the economic, sociological, and the political procedures
resulted in the development as well as the importance of the knowledge and the
knowledge economy. Today, the knowledge which is the particular indicator of
knowing something and know-how is associated with the welfare and the power.
Those who can produce and utilize the knowledge can compete with the others
easily. Therefore, it can be stated that the knowledge is the main determinant of
current age called as „the age of information‟. In a way, this inclination shaped a
great many things in the society from the education to the employment strategies of
the nations. Even more, the requirements of the employees altered unlike those in
the industrial period. As an example, the internationalization of the human capital in
terms of their qualifications, the occurrence of the knowledge workers put a
different point to the employment based strategically approach. Within this
framework, the main aim of the study is to analyze the changing perspectives of the
employment and the employees by referencing to the information centered society.
Key Words: Knowledge economy, knowledge, knowledge worker

Introduction
There has been an ongoing change all over the course of the history in every fields of the
society, that is to say, politically, economically, scientifically and so forth. From this
perspective, it can be argued that the change is the main dynamism of the world. Each
member of the world renew themselves based upon this change criteria perpetually.
Concerning the developmental process of humankind, that is also the case. For example,
the industrial revolution which is the root of the economic growth in the Western countries
on technology which results from the usage of useful knowledge and the interaction of the
knowledge itself can be interpreted as the turning point in the life cycle of the humans. The
reason is that the industrial revolution which was a kind of transition from hand made

1

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

products to the industrial manufacture provided the productivity growth and the relative
quality in the life. 1
In the aftermath of industrial revolution, the parameters belonged to the age of agriculture
was redefined. Along with the development of industry, new terms such as factory, wage,
trade unions, and social policy implementations entered to the life and the life of one‟s own
was isolated from the working place. The working hours occurred and the freedom of the
employees was submitted to the initiative of the employers in spite of the fact that the
means of production did not belong to the employees which bring about the alienation to
the work, to the employers and to the product that they manufactured. The gap between
employees and the employers resulted in the clash, so to say, the clash of power on the
manufacturing system. At the same time, the capitalism which can be taken into account as
the social system in which “the means for producing and distributing goods (the land,
factories, technology, transport system etc.) are owned by a small minority of people.” To
put in another way, the capitalists are those who possess the capital. And the majority of
the people who work for them are called the workers who sell their ability to work in
return for a salary or wage. That‟s why, the ultimate effect of industrial revolution is the
occurrence of the class of employees and the employers. But, the profile of the employees
are too low, they are not so talented and they just serve for the capitalist idea which is
profit driven. Here, it can be said that in the early times of the industrial revolution, the
great majority of the people who were workers were exploited by the employers because of
the fact that they do not have the bargaining power and they are not so skilled. All these
also cause the low wage for the workers as well. 2
The third turning point in the lives of humankinds is the knowledge revolution which lays
a great emphasis on the production and the usage of the knowledge. In this age, the
knowledge is synonymous with the power. Those who produce knowledge and those who
use it have the power all over the world. In this term, the employment and the worker
profile radically changed on account of the fact that the requirements of the employment
and the worker altered too. Therefore, in this study, the ultimate objective is to reveal the
significance of the knowledge economy on the labor relations generally, and specifically
the employment and employees profile.
Knowledge
Knowledge that is regarded as the asset of the upcoming future is “understanding of or
information about a subject that you get by experience or study, either known by one
person or by people generally” or “the state of knowing about or being familiar with
something”. 3 What about information, wisdom, data and the other terms? What are the
differences of these terms with knowledge? Are they the same or similar? The equation
among these terms can be revealed in the following formula: 4

1

Joel Mokry, “Why Was The Industrial Revolution A European Phenomenon?” Supreme Court Economic
Review, Vol 10, The Rule of Law, Freedom and Prosperity, 2003, pp. 27, 28.
2
http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/what-capitalism (Retrieved 15.04.2013).
3
Cambridge
University
Dictionary,
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/knowledge?q=knowledge (Retrieved 15.04.2013).
4
Anthon P. Botha, Knowledge-Living and Working With It, Published by Juta and Co, Cape Town South
Africa, 2007, p. 10.

2

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Figure 1: The Equation of Knowledge

Wisdom=Knowledge+Experience

Source: Anthon P. Botha, Knowledge-Living and Working with It, Published by Juta and Co, Cape Town
South Africa, 2007, p. 10.

As seen in figure one, knowledge, along with the experience, equates the wisdom. In
regards to hierarchy, wisdom ranks higher than knowledge which was followed by
information and data. The knowledge can be put in order in this way:
Data includes raw and fresh facts.
Information is the facts given in a particular context.
Knowledge is the information that targets action.
Wisdom is to determine which knowledge can be used in which context and
for what purpose. So, wisdom is the highest level of ranking.
So as to make these terms more concrete, a new example can be given. For instance, if
someone says “30”, this does not mean anything. It could be height, kilometer, kilograms
or something like that. So here the number 30 is the raw material. But, if someone says 30
Centigrade, everyone will understand that it is about temperature. This is the information
which is used in contexts. Additionally, if someone says that 30 is the age when a person is
productive most, this is called as knowledge. So, in a way knowledge is type of
information that is accepted generally by everyone. Wisdom as the upper degree of
knowledge is common feeling which is also tested with the experiences as well. 5 In a way,
knowledge is something like a term that is neither data nor information but it is actually
related to both. Maybe, knowledge “is plural, heterogeneous phenomenon that comprises
multiple rationalities, whose logics are not defined by a transcendental norm but relate to
the pragmatics of contexts.” 6 There are some very particular developments that play a key
role in the development of the knowledge as in the following: 7
a) The economic globalizations that necessitate the firms adapt themselves to the
innovation and the scientific improvement.
b) The increasing awareness concerning the value of specialized knowledge.
c) The increasing awareness on the knowledge as a distinct factor for production.
d) Computer networking.
As seen in the items, the knowledge taken into account as the value in 21th century
does not occur all of a sudden. However, there are some turning points that contribute to
the emergence of the knowledge such as industrial revolution, globalization and computer
networking. All these things pave the way that the knowledge is the ultimate result
concerning these development oriented issues.
Age of Knowledge and Its Reflections on the Society
Rather than the theoretical basis of the knowledge, it is a kind of name that is associated
with a particular period. Especially after the neoliberal policies in the world following the
5

Botha, Ibid, p. 10.
Elias M. Awad and Hassan M. Ghaziri, Knowledge Management, Second Impression, Published by
Dorling Kindersley, India, 2008, p. 56.
7
James W. Cortoda, Rise of the Knowledge Worker, Heinamann Press, 1999.
6

3

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

crisis of 1970, the world started to debate about the knowledge and its importance. The
industry and all aspects of live started to be associated with the knowledge. The paradigms
of the industrial revolution changed. Instead of physical inputs, the intellectual capabilities
of the humans come to the fore.8 The knowledge is regarded as a sort of “unique attribute”
and it is dealt with by humans through mental processes, awareness as well as intuition and
can solely be transferred through learning activity. 9
Here, this age is named after information age, knowledge age, information society and ext.
The developmental process is a little bit relative. Without any hesitation, the unique feature
of this society is that these societies are driven by the creativities. It is an advantage for the
economy but some people like Schumpeter argue that this is a period of “creative
destruction.” Yeah, it causes continuous economic growth and richness for the general
society and it includes the public good but its identity of “profit” disorders the social norms
and social orders. 10 The availability of the knowledge in the internet erodes some of the
professions and also the subject centered knowledge. 11
The remains of the knowledge society dates back even before the industrial revolution. To
put in an explicit term, it can be argued that the knowledge society is not the first
experience of the humankinds in the nineteenth century.
As an example, the Renaissance which can be interpreted as the rebirth of the Europe is
well known for the scientific improvements in the Middle Ages. There were technological
and communicative progresses that left a great impact on the society with the mass printing
technologies that superseded the hand written manuscripts.
In the period of Renaissance, the books are started to be published and they became more
accessible. As in Renaissance, the knowledge society that is the upper advance stage of the
knowledge production and the usage, electronic communications, software service
providers, the internet, the mobile phones symbolize the extended form of the information.
In each situation, the possession of the knowledge is viewed as the social and economic
resource, in a way, commercial item.
Both in the period of Renaissance and modern age, the knowledge has been practical if it is
put into practice along with its theoretical side.
All these things pave the way that there is not a single knowledge society but a few which
changed the vision of the nations and broadened their perspectives. 12

8

Walter W. Powell and Kasia Snellman, “The Knowledge Economy”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol 30,
2004, p. 199; Süleyman Kevük, “Bilgi Ekonomisi”, Journal of Yaşar University, 1/ 4, Ekim 2006, pp. 320322.
9
Debra M. Amidon, Innovation Strategy For The Knowledge Economy The Ken Awakening, Heinmann
Publication, USA, 1997, p .5.
10
Andy Hargreaves, Teaching in The Knowledge Society Education In The Age of Insecurity, Teachers
College Press Publication, Colombia University, USA, 2003, p. 1.
11
Peter John Williams, “Valid Knowledge: The Economy and The Academy”, Higher Education, Vol 54,
No 4, October 2007, p. 512.
12
Jennifer Adelstein, “What Makes
Knowledge Society? Privileging Discourses”, Ed. Katerina
Nicolopoulou, Mine Karataş Özkan, Ahu Tatli, John Taylor, Global Knowledge Work Diversity and
Relational Perspectives, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, USA, 2011, p. 9.

4

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Table 1: The Comparison of the Knowledge Societies
Knowledge Society
Information technologies
Computers

Discursive Objects
The shift of communication
Technology

Electronic
telecommunication systems
Knowledge as a social and
economic resource
Knowledge as an accessible
concept
Application
of
the
knowledge as well as its
practice
New forms of organization
that emphasizes knowledge
frameworks
Electronic databases
Information society

The spread of knowledge
Resource
Accessibility
Not just theory but also practice

Renaissance
Script to printing
The development of the
printing press
Book publishers and the
book sellers
Publishing as a social and
political source
Greater access to the
written materials
The theories are made a
knowledge framework

Advance

The progress
translation

in

the

The storage of the information
Informing and to be informed

Printed books
The transition to medieval
to early modern
From oral to literature
society
Church and the state

From elementary education Educational shift
to higher education
Global
institutions, Institutional control
governments,
and
corporations
Knowledge
society Political effectiveness
The nation states and
contributes
to
the
nationalism
development
of
the
globalization.
Source: Jennifer Adelstein, “What Makes Knowledge Society? Privileging Discourses”, Ed. Katerina
Nicolopoulou, Mine Karataş Özkan, Ahu Tatli, John Taylor, Global Knowledge Work Diversity and
Relational Perspectives, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, USA, 2011, p. 10; Michael B. Arthur, Denise M.
Rousseau, The Boundaryless Career A New Employment Principle For A New Organizational Era, Oxford
University Press, UK, 1996.

The age of knowledge brings communication technologies and the computer as the main
directors of the labor and labor relations. Unlike from the agricultural and industrial
revolution, the age of knowledge can be defined as the knowledge revolution as it causes
radical changes in all the spheres of life. Especially those countries that adapt themselves
to the knowledge based orientations get a competitive advantage over the other countries.
Also, in this age, the knowledge means the power and the power means running and
controlling the world. 13
The production and the use of the knowledge which adds plus value to the productivity and
innovation14 is the indispensable parts of the knowledge age. All the paradigms of the
society are shaped within the knowledge identity and learning such as lifelong learning that
constitutes the core of the society and that paves the way for the development of the
society as well. Here it can be discussed that it is impossible to isolate the knowledge age
from the ongoing learning process. The learning is not teacher centered but in the stark
contrast the learning is student centered. And also the learning as different from the classic
13

Derek Law, “Information Policy For A New Millennium”, Library Review, Volume 49, Number 7, 2000,
p. 324.
14
Giovanni Peri, “Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation”, The Review of
Economics and Statistics, Vol 87, No 2, May 2005, p. 308.

5

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

idea is not just confined to the school and there are lots of sources to learn information.
However, the function of the schools is to make the students teach how to learn. 15
In the age of knowledge, the production of the knowledge as well as using it has been
paramount importance as the knowledge is taken into account as the power itself. The
internet, the telecommunication systems, the computer are the prominent devices utilized
for the production of the knowledge which pave the way that humans come closer and the
world is smaller. This also fosters the globalization itself.
The information age in which organizational effectiveness gained momentum with the
various management styles such as Total Quality Management (TQM), Strategic Human
Resources Management (SHRM), and Talent Management (TM) supported the
competitiveness and also operational learning for the businesses. 16 The old paradigms, the
old management styles, and the traditional company concepts doom to change with this
new trend as shown in the following table. 17

Table 2: The Difference between Traditional Company and Knowledge Driven Company
Traditional Company
The Knowledge Driven Company
Procedures
Challenges
Centralized Management, Hierarchy
Self-Management, Flexibility
External Allocation of Work
Ones of allocation of work
Resistance to the change
Ongoing change
Closed to the world
Open to the world
Supervision
Self-supervision
Source: Peter Hold Christensen, Knowledge Management Perspectives and Pitfalls, Copenhagen Business
School Press, Denmark, 2003, p. 10.

As seen in Table 2, with the knowledge oriented concept, the businesses commenced to
alter their strategies, and they reshaped their ideas concerning the knowledge itself. The
new age made the companies bend the rules and they put the flexibility into the center. The
companies in this age are open to change and open to the world. So, they used these kinds
of motives and methods to capture the attention of the knowledge workers and to adapt this
new era as illustrated in Table 3. 18

15

Andy Hargreaves, Teaching In The Knowledge Society Education In The Age of Insecurity, Published
by Teachers College Press, New York, USA, 2003, p. 1, 3; Refik Balay, “Küreselleşme, Bilgi Toplumu ve
Eğitim”, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 37, Sayı 2, 2004, p. 69.
16
Amit Shankar Mukherjee, Michael A Lapre, Luk N. Van Wassenhove, “Knowledge Driven Quality
Improvement”, Management Science, Vol 44, No 11, 1998, p. 35.
17
Peter Hold Christensen, Knowledge Management Perspectives and Pitfalls, Copenhagen Business
School Press, Denmark, 2003, p. 10.
18
Christensen, Ibid, pp. 10, 17.

6

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Table 3: The Motives and the Methods That the Knowledge Companies To Use
Motives
Adapting a management style that is quite modern
for the knowledge workers.
Searching new knowledge.

Methods
Informing the public concerning the engagement of
the company in the knowledge management.
Allowing the staff to produce new knowledge and
making them to be productive.
Learning from the experience of the company.
Spending so much time on the projects that the
company developed well in advance.
Improving the knowledge of the staff concerning the Establishing a network that provides to the each staff
company.
what they are doing about the company.
Guaranteeing the independence of the staff
Documenting the knowledge of the employees which
will decrease the vulnerability effect of the company
when the staff leaves from the work.
Finding a way to retain the staff as they possess Offering better opportunities to the staff which will
invaluable knowledge.
motivate them.
Encouraging the staff to improve knowledge Developing the dialogue among the staff to share
sharing.
their knowledge on the staff.
Source: Peter Hold Christensen, Knowledge Management Perspectives and Pitfalls, Copenhagen Business
School Press, Denmark, 2003, p. 17.

The companies in the age of knowledge are to use some motives and methods to increase
the dynamism of them. For example, they should adapt flexible management, they should
find a way to search for new knowledge, they should get lessons from their past
experiences, they should give utmost importance to free mobility of the employees, they
should learn to retain the staff and so forth. These new organizational ways of the
knowledge companies are to be competitive and it is to strengthen the organizational
culture of them which is the sinequanon of the information age. In this context, considering
that the information age is effective in all parts of society, the reflections of the knowledge
on the society as a whole not just on the businesses can be summarized in the following
items.
The improvement of the knowledge in the society can be regarded as a kind of
revolution as it ends with radical transformations.
In the age of knowledge, the society is started to be shaped concerning information
production and its usage.
The fundamental paradigms of the industrial society were left and the codes of the
community were reshaped within the idea of innovation.
The knowledge means economic, politic and cultural power all over the world.
The classical management styles also changed as in personnel management. Instead
of all these, new and modern ones were replaced like human resource management,
strategic human resource management, talent management and so on.
The hierarchical mechanisms of the working environment were left and flexibility
was put into practice. At the same time, flexible working such as tele-work, part
time work, homework entered to the working.
The devices of the knowledge society such as internet and telecommunication
accelerated the process of globalization.
New concepts in the education like lifelong learning, distance learning occurred.
So, the learning process went beyond the school environment and a particular age
period owing to the fact that the information becomes old and obsolete in a short
period of time, and it is to be updated. All these arguments pave the way that the
learning turns into a paradigm which something like from “cradle to grave”.

7

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

The profiles of the employees changed as well. This means that the requirements of
the workers are needed to be updated within the context of the knowledge age.
Otherwise, the companies do not increase their competitive advantage as the human
resource is their assets.
The e-mail, Google, Facebook, messenger as the products of the social media are
the other outputs of the information age. Through thisequipment, the world come
closer and the people get in touch with one another easily.
The modern education techniques like computer assisted learning and also the
technological devices like smart boards, overhead projectors, computer labs altered
the vision of the education.
Knowledge Management
The internal infrastructure of the companies and the increasing complexity of the
environment make them invest in innovation and the scarcity of the resources brings the
knowledge to the fore as the success of the businesses. From this perspective, it can be
mentioned that knowledge is taken into account as the crucial factor that surpasses the
other production factors such as labor, capital, land, and so forth. Here, knowledge
management occurred “as a label for consciously perceiving and addressing the issues
raised by the importance and availability of knowledge.” Knowledge management can be
addressed as a sort of management that manages the knowledge as the source. It is also
concerned with managing the knowledge related concepts such as knowledge workers on
the basis of creating and maintaining plus value concerning knowledge. Knowledge
management as its perspective is so wide; it includes business studies, sociology,
psychology, educational science, computer science, cognitive science, and so forth. 19
Knowledge management in other words is a new, interdisciplinary concept that puts the
knowledge on the center of the organizational processes. Knowledge as it provides the
ultimate competitive advantage for the firms; it involves different factors like technology,
people, organizational processes, and knowledge. 20
Figure 1: The Components of Knowledge Management

Knowledge

People
(Workforce)

Technology
(IT
Infrastructur
e)

Organization
al Processes

Source: Elias M. Awad and Hassan M. Ghaziri, Knowledge Management, Second Impression, Published by
Dorling Kindersley, India, 2008, p. 27.

19

Herwig Rollett, Knowledge Management Processes and Technologies, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Massachusetts, USA, 2003, p. 6.
20
Awad and Ghaziri, Ibid, pp. 26, 27.

8

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Figure 1 reveals that knowledge management is the main framework of the management in
the organizations rooted in the production of the knowledge including knowledge, people
as human resource, technology and organizational processes. According to the knowledge
management, the organizations use accessible knowledge from outside resources, stores
knowledge in business products, represents the knowledge in various databases as well as
documents, promotes the knowledge improvement by means of organizational culture and
the other incentives, transfers and shares the knowledge among the different parts of the
organizations and assess the value of the knowledge. 21
Knowledge Economy
Knowledge economy which will be “complemented by a set of organizational mechanisms
that encourage and promote the sharing/reuse of organizational knowledge”22 can be
defined as a term that plays a key role in the production as well as the services based
knowledge intensive activities that contribute to the technological scientific progress
besides the quick obsolescence. This means that in the knowledge based economy, the
primary thing to be taken into account is the knowledge itself and it is to be updated
perpetually. Additionally the key component of the knowledge economy is the dependence
on the mental in other words intellectual capabilities of a particular person rather than the
physical strength or the natural resources. The main arguments mentioned here are the
results of the leading sides of the economy especially in the developed countries which is
actually driven by the technology and technological devices centered on the knowledge
production and spread. 23
The concept of knowledge economy is the direct results in the development of the new
technologies which starter to emerge in the late 1950s and gained momentum with the
advance in the personal computers and then systematically become so widespread through
the use of email and the internet technology. 24 All these things make the knowledge as the
main important factor in the development of the economy as a result of the high
technology investments and high technology industries. 25
The usage of the knowledge economy dates back to the OECD report from 1996 and also
the Lisbon strategy in the European Union from 2000 in spite of the fact that the debates
about the central role of the concept for productivity and the competitiveness commenced
so earlier. The knowledge economy entails the production of the knowledge as a sort of
must for the countries along with the innovation. These requirements also necessitate the
transformation of the employment policies as well as the employees‟ profiles. 26
The emergence of the knowledge economy is the indicator of the human development. It
ruins the particular parameters of the agricultural and industrial period. For example, in the
agricultural economy, the key source is the land while in industrial economy, natural
21

Awad and Ghaziri, Ibid, p. 27.
Uday R. Kulkarni, Sury Ravindran and Ronald Freeze, “A Knowledge Management Success Model:
Theoreticel Development and Emprical Validation”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol
23, No 3, Winter 2006, 2007, p. 311.
23
Powell and Snellman, Ibid, p. 199.
24
Powell and Snellman, Ibid, p. 199.
25
OECD The Knowledge Based Economy, General Distribution, Paris, 1996, p. 7.
26
Knut Ingar Westeren, “Developments In The Analysis of The Knowledge Economy: Introductory
Comments”, Ed. Knut Ingar Westeren, Foundations of The Knowledge Economy Innovation, Learning
and Clusters, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, USA, 2012, pp. 1, 6.
22

9

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

resources like coal or iron ore as well as the labor are of great significance. On the other
hand, in the knowledge economy the key resource is the knowledge which plays an
important role in the development of the economy which is not a new idea actually. At the
same time, it is to be demonstrated that knowledge is not a peculiar concept to the
knowledge economy or knowledge age, contrarily; it has been used since the period of
Industrial Revolution. However, the intensity of the knowledge and its main significance
increased in the age of knowledge and it becomes the main dynamics of the economy as
well which means that there is a rise in the knowledge intensity of the economic activities
and the concept of globalization process. 27
Figure 2: The Dynamics of Knowledge Economy

1. The transformation of knowledge as an
economic output.
2. The knowledge is the main director of the
economic activities.
3. The knowledge means money and power.
4. Technological devices, internet, information
technologies are the complementary items of
knıowledge economy.
5. The knowledge transforms the profiles of the
employees and the employment.
Source: John Houghton and Peter Sheehan, A Primer On The Knowledge Economy, Centre For Strategic
Economic Studies, Victoria University, Australia, 2000, pp. 1, 2.

Knowledge Worker
The importance of the knowledge also has a deep impact on the worker and employment
profiles. Knowledge worker is the output of the knowledge society who emphasizes the
significance of the knowledge. The progress in the knowledge didn‟t just transform the
society, education but also it affected the worker profile and the employment policies. The
knowledge skills are quite different from the industry or agriculture skills which can be
assessed that the employment tactics of the twentieth century are not the case for the
organizational innovation in the age of information. As in the management skills of the
organizations, the requirements of the workers strikingly changed. As an example, the
basic skills like reading, writing become so irrelevant and inadequate when we enter the
twenty first century as the main parameters to be focused in this period is the continual
learning oriented knowledge production. Even the skills like computer programming,

27

John Houghton and Peter Sheehan, A Primer On The Knowledge Economy, Centre For Strategic
Economic Studies, Victoria University, Australia, 2000, pp. 1, 2.

10

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

system analysis and system design have to be redefined again by taking into account the
critical in the society. 28
The knowledge workers are quite distinctive from the other workers in regards to their task
structures and skill requirements that bring them creative use, manipulation, and the
extension of the knowledge. Moreover, the requirements of the knowledge workers are
those: continuous job learning, partly formal education, the capability to use modern
technology, information and the communication technologies. The knowledge workers
also do not work alone them work in teams. Based upon all these, the knowledge workers
can be defined as the groups of workers or wage earners whose job meet these criteria: “(1)
the use of information technology; (2) independent design of important aspects of the job;
and (3) at least upper intermediate vocational training (a college degree).29 The differences
between knowledge workers and the workers in the industrial revolution are stated below.
The knowledge workers rely upon their intellectual capabilities while the industrial
workers depend on their physical strengths.
The knowledge worker focuses on innovation but the industrial workers centers on
production.
The knowledge workers are goal oriented. The industrial workers are wage
oriented.
The knowledge workers‟ objective is the production of the knowledge. However,
the industrial workers aim at the production of the commodities.
There is no time and space limitation for the knowledge workers, but that is not the
case for industrial workers on account of the fact that their works are carried out in
a limited area, that is, the factory.
The knowledge workers are educated and skilled but this is not the point for the
industrial workers. For example in the early years of the industrialization, the
workers are low skilled.
The instruments of the knowledge workers to produce the knowledge are strikingly
different from the industrial workers. Knowledge workers use computers,
information technologies whereas the industrial workers utilize the machines in the
factory.
The knowledge workers have the bargaining power as they cannot be replaced
easily, but this is not so in industrial workers.
The knowledge workers view the work as a time demanding activity while the
industrial workers regard it as a type of time consuming activity. This means that
their perception of the work is quite different.
The added value of the product of knowledge workers are higher than the others
because the knowledge that can be used in the real life is something like the money
itself.
Conclusion
The change is the main paradigms in all the societies. Throughout history, there are various
events that cause radical transformations in the society like renaissance, industrial
revolution, French revolution, knowledge revolution and so on. Particularly from the
28

A.D. Amar, Managing Knowledge Workers Unleashing Innovation and Productivity, Greenwood
Publishing, USA, 2002, p. 10.
29
Pasi Pyöria, Harri Melin and Raimo Blom, Knowledge Workers in The Information Society, Tampere
University Press, Finland, 2005, p. 14.

11

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

perspective of industrial relations and labor economics, it can be stated that the knowledge
economy shifted the employment procedures as well as the employees‟ profile. In a way,
knowledge revolution increased the standards of the employees. The employment policies
changed as the information become so obsolete in a short period of time. The employee
characteristics changed as they turn into the workers who produce knowledge and the
knowledge is regarded as added value for the economy. The knowledge also means money
and the power despite some arguments. No one can deny the fact that the gaining
momentum of the knowledge economy is resulted in fundamental changes in all the
spheres of society.
References
A.D. Amar, Managing Knowledge Workers Unleashing Innovation and Productivity,
Greenwood Publishing, USA, 2002.
Amit Shankar Mukherjee, Michael A Lapre, Luk N. Van Wassenhove, “Knowledge
Driven Quality Improvement”, Management Science, Vol 44, No 11, 1998, pp.
35-49.
Andy Hargreaves, Teaching In The Knowledge Society Education In The Age of
Insecurity, Published by Teachers College Press, New York, USA, 2003.
Andy Hargreaves, Teaching in The Knowledge Society Education In The Age of
Insecurity, Teachers College Press Publication, Colombia University, USA, 2003.
Anthon P. Botha, Knowledge-Living and Working With It, Published by Juta and Co,
Cape Town South Africa, 2007.
Cambridge University Dictionary, http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/know
ledge?q=knowledge (Retrieved 15.04.2013).
Debra M. Amidon, Innıvation Strategy For The Knowledge Economy The Ken
Awakening, Heinmann Publication, USA, 1997.
Derek Law, “Information Policy For A New Millennium”, Library Review, Volume 49,
Number 7, 2000, pp. 322-330.
Elias M. Awad and Hassan M. Ghaziri, Knowledge Management, Second Impression,
Published by Dorling Kindersley, India, 2008.
Giovanni Peri, “Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation”, The
Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol 87, No 2, May 2005, pp. 308-322.
Herwig Rollett, Knowledge Management Processes and Technologies, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Massachusetts, USA, 2003.
http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/what-capitalism (Retrieved 15.04.2013).
James W. Cortoda, Rise of the Knowledge Worker, Heinamann Press, 1999.

12

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Jennifer Adelstein, “What Makes Knowledge Society? Privileging Discourses”, Ed.
Katerina Nicolopoulou, Mine Karataş Özkan, Ahu Tatli, John Taylor, Global
Knowledge Work Diversity and Relational Perspectives, Edward Elgar Publishing
Limited, USA, 2011, pp 3-21.
Joel Mokry, “Why Was The Industrial Revolution A European Phenomenon?” Supreme
Court Economic Review, Vol 10, The Rule of Law, Freedom and Prosperity,
2003, pp. 27-63.
John Houghton and Peter Sheehan, A Primer On The Knowledge Economy, Centre For
Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Australia, 2000.
Knut Ingar Westeren, “Developments In The Analysis of The Knowledge Economy:
Introductory Comments”, Ed. Knut Ingar Westeren, Foundations of The
Knowledge Economy Innovation, Learning and Clusters, Edward Elgar
Publishing Limited, USA, 2012, pp. 1-14.
Michael B. Arthur, Denise M. Rousseau, The Boundaryless Career A New Employment
Principle For A New Organizational Era, Oxford University Press, UK, 1996.
OECD The Knowledge Based Economy, General Distribution, Paris, 1996.
Pasi Pyöria, Harri Melin and Raimo Blom, Knowledge Workers in The Information
Society, Tampere University Press, Finland, 2005.
Peter Hold Christensen, Knowledge Management Perspectives and Pitfalls, Copenhagen
Business School Press, Denmark, 2003.
Peter John Williams, “Valid Knowledge: The Economy and The Academy”, Higher
Education, Vol 54, No 4, October 2007, pp. 511-523.
Refik Balay, “Küreselleşme, Bilgi Toplumu ve Eğitim”, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim
Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 37, Sayı 2, 2004, pp. 61-82.
Süleyman Kevük, “Bilgi Ekonomisi”, Journal of Yaşar University, 1/ 4, Ekim 2006, pp.
319-350.
Uday R. Kulkarni, Sury Ravindran and Ronald Freeze, “A Knowledge Management
Success Model: Theoreticel Development and Emprical Validation”, Jorunal of
Management Information Systems, Vol 23, No 3, Winter 2006, 2007, pp. 309347.
Walter W. Powell and Kasia Snellman, “The Knowledge Economy”, Annual Review of
Sociology, Vol 30, 2004, pp. 199-220.

13

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13686">
                <text>1659</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13687">
                <text>The Knowledge Economy and its Impact on the  Employment and the Employees’ Profile</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13688">
                <text>OREN, Kenan
YUKSEL, Hasan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13689">
                <text>Throughout history, there has been a radical transformation concerning  the developmental stages in the lives of human beings. The first stage that  initiates with the agriculture continues with industry which is the main  turning points in the sociological perspective of work and working life. The  Industrial Revolution that was the sign of transformation from the manual  oriented economy to the machine oriented ones also shifted the  requirements of the human resource capital. The new terms about the  work entered to the literature such as the time, wage, and trade unions,  working conditions, factories and so forth. This event called as  industrialization as different from the period of agriculture isolated the  work and family life from one another. In the third period, the economic,  sociological, and the political procedures resulted in the development as  well as the importance of the knowledge and the knowledge economy.  Today, the knowledge which is the particular indicator of knowing  something and know-how is associated with the welfare and the power.  Those who can produce and utilize the knowledge can compete with the  others easily. Therefore, it can be stated that the knowledge is the main  determinant of current age called as ‘the age of information’. In a way, this  inclination shaped a great many things in the society from the education to  the employment strategies of the nations. Even more, the requirements of  the employees altered unlike those in the industrial period. As an example,  the internationalization of the human capital in terms of their  qualifications, the occurrence of the knowledge workers put a different  point to the employment based strategically approach. Within this  framework, the main aim of the study is to analyze the changing  perspectives of the employment and the employees by referencing to the  information centered society.  Keywords: Knowledge Economy, Knowledge, Knowledge Worker.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13690">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13691">
                <text>2013-05-10</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13692">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13693">
                <text>ISSN 978-9958-834-23-3     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2533" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20023">
                <text>823</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20024">
                <text>The Language Barrier in the Cross-Cultural Communication between East and West: A Comparative Analysis</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20025">
                <text>Kulanic, Ahmed </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20026">
                <text>The use of language in international arena and international politics plays a significant role, especially in the world after 9/11 attacks in USA. The spoken words got more important functions by the process of globalization, and spread of mass-media communication. The aim of this paper is to examine the key terms and concepts in the communication between East and West with focus on the (mis)understanding of the terms such as: jihad darul-islam/harb/sulh, crusades, democracy, and human rights in a post 9/11 world. The paper presents the historical overview and evolution of these terms in Islamic as well in western societies. Thus, this paper offers the interpretation of the words jihad darul-islam/harb/sulh, crusades, democracy, and human rights through the Islamic prism of understanding and cultural experience but also through the prism of understanding and experience of the societies in the West. Furthermore, this paper analyzes the denotations and connotations of these particular words and their significance in international political communication.  </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20027">
                <text>2012-05</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20028">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="32">
        <name>P Philology. Linguistics</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1936" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2851">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/a91c66d1c334d554e934d8351fd30b91.docx</src>
        <authentication>1d513034a81582de08a78c7037fcf1aa</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2852">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/e16bcdd2361092157418f99824ded6ce.pdf</src>
        <authentication>263b89652fac918a7e00d94fd8b42ffc</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="15891">
                    <text>The Language of Entertainment News is a Serious Business!
Tatjana Marjanović
University of Banja Luka/ Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Key words: entertainment news, structural complexity, semantic diversity
ABSTRACT
An essentially qualitative structural and semantic analysis is performed on the text of an ‘American Idol’ coverage
posted on yahoo.com January 24th, 2013, constituting a micro corpus of 2,739 words. Being what it is,
entertainment laced with a shot of drama and scandal, most of us share similar expectations as to what packaging
such content will come in: in short, we anticipate relatively informal language and simple structures. However, a
preliminary analysis of the story reveals at face value a fair amount of both phrasal and clausal complexity, with
modification embedded at different levels of structures under investigation. Moreover, not only do the structures
appear morphologically and syntactically complex, but their semantic representations also add to this diversity.
Much as providing too much detail at word, phrase and clause level can easily lead to information overload, it also
makes a clever tactic helping to transform a basically frivolous event into a top story of the day. It seems to be an
attempt to ascribe relevance and newsworthiness to an affair that is nothing more than entertainment, but the
aforementioned strategies almost make it look like a serious business.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15884">
                <text>1989</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15885">
                <text>The Language of Entertainment News is a Serious Business!</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15886">
                <text>MARJANOVIC, Tatjana </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15887">
                <text>Key words: entertainment news, structural complexity, semantic diversity  ABSTRACT  An essentially qualitative structural and semantic analysis is performed on the text of an ‘American Idol’ coverage posted on yahoo.com January 24th, 2013, constituting a micro corpus of 2,739 words. Being what it is, entertainment laced with a shot of drama and scandal, most of us share similar expectations as to what packaging such content will come in: in short, we anticipate relatively informal language and simple structures. However, a preliminary analysis of the story reveals at face value a fair amount of both phrasal and clausal complexity, with modification embedded at different levels of structures under investigation. Moreover, not only do the structures appear morphologically and syntactically complex, but their semantic representations also add to this diversity. Much as providing too much detail at word, phrase and clause level can easily lead to information overload, it also makes a clever tactic helping to transform a basically frivolous event into a top story of the day. It seems to be an attempt to ascribe relevance and newsworthiness to an affair that is nothing more than entertainment, but the aforementioned strategies almost make it look like a serious business.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15888">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15889">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15890">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="971" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7755">
                <text>3546</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7756">
                <text>THE LEARNING AND MASTERY OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES: A KEY STEP TO PROFESSIONAL INSERTION IN CAMEROON</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7757">
                <text>II Medzogo, Sylvain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7758">
                <text>Relationships with others, in this modern globalized world, command respective challenges in communication and bring closely everyone into connection with people of other languages and cultures. The latter make people require exchanging cognitive notions, thoughts and principles through this connection, and to achieve this goal a strong medium is needed: language. Language is at the heart of human beings interaction and mostly for children’s learning. Through language, one can receive knowledge and acquire skills. Language enables both to communicate with others efficiently for a variety of objectives and to scrutinize their own and others’ experiences, feelings and ideas, giving them order and meaning. Because language is central to children’s intellectual, emotional and social development, it has an essential role across the curriculum and helps pupils’ learning to be coherent and progressive. This is a reality in Cameroonian schools and even at professional level. The fact that local, national, official and foreign languages are spoken in Cameroon makes the country unique and exceptional in Africa and even in the world. One can realise in Cameroon sub-system of Education, for instance, that a student can learn French, English, German, Spanish, Chinese or one of the 300 native languages that counts the country. Thus, Foreign and second language education has developed to unravel the challenges the present and prospective interlocutors encounter, by emphasizing on learning how to communicate successfully with others speaking a different language and living a different culture. Better still, the mother tongue as well as official languages (French and English) and some foreign languages ( Italian, Spanish, Chinese…) remain, in Cameroon,  part of the curriculum throughout primary, secondary and tertiary schooling, and this enables the learners to communicate worldwide and also be in acquaintance not only with their own cultural awareness but also with the others. Languages have become very important in Cameroon in looking and getting jobs in the public administration. The premise of the paper is, then, to highlight the benefits that are hidden behind the learning of languages in Cameroon. It also shows the place languages play in the development of Cameroonians’ awareness and competence in the use of two or more languages: an asset for a better insertion in society at professional level.     Keywords: Challenges, Communication, Plurilingual, Professional Level, tutored environment</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7759">
                <text>2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7760">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>PE English</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2923" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3691">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/98a7830f293d7bec8b637632eb3fd8b2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>acfe7fa8c168c63012e5aeb695de6068</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="22651">
                    <text>2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9, 2010 Sarajevo

The Level of Using Technology for Pre-Graduate Students While Preparing
Assignments
Ahmet Ocak AKDEMĐR
Doctoral Student at Ataturk University
Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences
Instructor at Ağrı Đbrahim Çeçen University
ahmetakdemir@agri.edu.tr
M. Emin ÖZDEMĐR
Professor at Ağrı Đbrahim Çeçen University
emos@atauni.edu.tr
Abstract:The aim of this study is to determine the level of using
technology of Pre-Graduate students likewise internet and other basic
technology resources while they are preparing their assignments. The
centre of the research is Pre-Graduate students of AICUNI (Ağrı Ibrahim
Çeçen University), Vocational Training School of Ağrı.
Students have opportunities of accessing some other resources different
from books and papers with the help of developing informative
technologies finding their way through educational settings. Contrary to
traditional teaching/learning methods, developing technologies, especially
educational technologies, make it unavoidable for students to use them
while preparing assignments. While evaluated as information resources,
technologies such as internet and TV undoubtedly provide great
convenience to students for their individual studying. However there exist
some obstacles in the technology use for students such as access to
technology, know-how of tools, anxiety level etc.
With the questionnaires that are applied to our students of Pre-Graduate
students of AICUNI (Ağrı Ibrahim Çeçen University), Vocational Training
School of Ağrı we tried to determine the level of using technologies while
they are preparing assignments.
Determining their level of using technology will be useful for teachers and
lecturers to understand students’ tendencies about internet and other
technological resources as educational materials.
Key Words: Pre-Graduate, technology, assignment, internet, educational
technologies.

Introduction
Technology, which literary means “applying knowledge to process in industry systematically”, broadly
is a collection of knowledge and abilities to actualize effective and productive process that covers research,
development, production, marketing, selling, service during post-selling period. Technological innovation is
defined as “innovation in production processes, mew productions and news types of institutional organizations”.
On the other hand, there are industry branches that are “science and technology oriented” sectors such as
particularly electronic, energy, informatics, space, bio-engineering, organic chemistry and defence industry that
is intersection of these sectors and brings the highest amount value added tax consequently contributes to social
welfare at the highest level. Using technology has become compulsory to get success in many fields now.
Technological opportunities and devices have been started to be used, in recent years, especially in education
fields densely and new teaching approaches have been started to be built considering education outputs.
As a result of common technical infrastructure in classes and buildings of schools using technology has
become one of the standards in all levels from primary to higher education. Access to mass media, on-line
libraries, internet and computer, digital databases and other technology based information sources has caused a
decrease regarding access to written and published sources. Accessibility, broadness and richness in terms of
content, time and financial savings are seen as positive aspects that support using technology.
Due to the high rate of unemployment, problems in the field of employment, increased numbers of
qualified staffs because of the high standard in education consequently there is a competition atmosphere that

289

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9, 2010 Sarajevo
always aims better standards. In order to be different from others under such an atmosphere, receive good
education has gained importance. In parallel with these facts, big steps taken in education field educational
statistics have reached a level that has potential to be raised fast. Especially, everyone has accepted that a higher
education, which focuses on technical and vocational education, has become compulsory.
Increased numbers of universities, increased students placements and new departments and programmes
established in the light of the needs analysis have made higher education a centre of attraction for young people.
There is a focus on technology based education to meet such a demand in the best way. To meet needs in terms
of intermediate staff, numbers of vocational high-school have been increased.
A transition process from traditional education mentality to mentality based on world facts has been
started as a result of schools which are equipped with technical infrastructure and technology opportunities in all
levels e.g. primary to higher education (Özdaş, 1997). There is more research and application based activities in
new education models and student-centred education mentality is practised. Students graduate from schools after
they gain qualities, which are requirements of their departments and potential professions, via fulfilling their
tasks such as research activities, performance projects and they become successful.
Homework, which is important for education, can be defined as out-of-school activities assigned by
teachers. These assignments are given to students as it is aimed that students should improve their knowledge
and abilities they gain inside of schools. While students do their homework, they gain new experiences with new
materials and knowledge. Students realize and improve their ability, interest and knowledge, make up their
deficiencies, gain habit to study lesson regularly, drift away from memorization and establish a studying method
based on research, increase their creativity via these experiences. Therefore, homework has short-term benefits
such as getting high mark and long-term benefits such as supporting aspects to become a successful, responsible,
creative, researcher person.
In this regard, homework can be classified under three topics:
• Application homework, it aims that students shall apply their new knowledge, abilities, repeat and revise
them. It is like practice homework that is about subjects of the concerned day.
• Preparatory homework, it aims to prepare students for next subjects in a better way and provide basic
knowledge about required subjects. It is like preparation for next day.
• Homework to improve, it is generally long time projects that are implemented in parallel with class
activities. It aims to improve students’ personal knowledge and abilities. It is like a research about a
particular subject or writing summary of a book (Aksüt,2005).
One of the most used sources in preparing projects and doing homework is access to internet. Internet,
which is preferred by students at the highest level as it contains more information that a student want and is easy
to use, is a unique education material but it may cause negative effects because of its risks.
Today when we think technology in terms of information source, we remember internet first and then
TV and other mass media tools such as digital databases and other technology based materials (Gentry,1995).
According to a research; information source and benefiting from internet during preparing project and doing
homework period is high among students of faculty of education. 70 % of student state that they benefit from
internet while they do their homework because it saves time. In addition students want to benefit also from
academicians’ personal webpage and universities’ e-libraries. (Aksüt,2005)

Method
Aim of this research is to determine associate degree students’ level of using technology while they
prepare their project and do their homework and their attitudes towards technology. This study is important
regarding the following aspects; associate degree students should be able to question education system that they
attend and verify outputs of education under existing conditions. Screening method has been used in the
research. There are 20 questions in the questionnaire. Subject of the questionnaire is students’ level of using
technology, their opinions and preferences about technology.
Results have been evaluated with five point likert scale. First the questionnaire had been applied to a
small group, which was determined coincidentally among main group and questions were discussed with these
students. In addition to that there were meetings with administrators and academicians of the Ağrı Đbrahim Çeçen
University, where research has been conducted. Sample of the research is composed of 153 students that chosen
randomly from four programmes of Ağrı Vocational High-school.

290

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9, 2010 Sarajevo

Programmes

Female

Male

Total

Accounting and Tax Applications

29

27

56

Machinery

1

31

32

Electricity

2

36

38

Furniture and Decoration

1

26

27

TOPTAL

33

120

153

Table 1. Gender of participants

Findings
As student activities are important in modern education mentality, associate degree students are given to
performance projects and this mentality contributes to intensify their knowledge via leading them to project
based studies and keep their high readiness level active during term. Therefore, students think that using
technology is compulsory in order to meet these requirements.
According to research findings; students use technological tools such as internet, TV and etc… at a high
level while they prepare their project and do their homework (4, 45). Most of the students think that preparing
project or doing homework in an internet house saves time (4,02). Students state that using technology makes
them successful (3,97), they are able to use computer programmes that are necessary to prepare their projects and
do their homework (3,86). Students group which took part in the research state that they want to benefit from
schools and academicians’ website as it is important for their success (3,83). Majority of the students defends
that information, which they get from internet is enough for their projects and homework (3,41).
Similarly majority of the students states that they use memory stick (3,35), access to e-book while they
prepare their projects and do their homework (3,03). Associate degree students, which think that homework
should be assigned in the form of performance projects (2,82), do not have clear opinions whether physical
environment is suitable or not to do homework in internet houses (2,69).
According to the research there are students that use town library (1,68) and school’s library (1,19) and
a significant amount of students ask help from staff in internet house (1,86) or pay money to staff for their
homework, projects (1,98).
Some students state that they use on-line libraries (1,45) and some other students defend books and
sources, which they currently have are enough (1,83). A small group of students (1,26) state that they benefit
from academicians’ books.

291

�I use technological facilities such as internet and TV while I prepare project or do
homework
Preparing project or doing homework in internet house saves time
Using technology to prepare projects or do homework contribute to my success
I am able to use computer programmes while I prepare projects or do homework
School’s website and academicians’ webpage provides easiness to us
Content of projects or homework based on internet, TV and other communication tools is
satisfactory
I know and use memory stick
I access to e-book rather than buy books that might be necessary for homework and
projects
Homework and projects should be assigned in the form of performance project
Physical environment in internet house is suitable to prepare projects or do homework
Laboratory and other technological sources in the school are satisfactory to prepare
projects or do homework
Technological facilities are used in a satisfactory level in the classes
I pay money to staff in internet house for my projects or homework
I ask help from staff in internet house for my projects or homework
Books and other sources that I have are enough to prepare projects or do homework
I often go to town library to do homework
I think academicians use computer in a satisfactory level
I can use database, on-line libraries
I benefit from academicians’ books while I prepare projects or do homework
I benefit from school’s library to prepare project or do homework

Average

OPTIONS

Order

2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9, 2010 Sarajevo

2

4,45

1

4,02

12

3,97

7

3,86

3

3,83

4

3,41

10

3,35

6

3,03

17

2,82

5

2,69

18

2,60

8

2,43

16

1,98

9

1,86

15

1,83

14

1,68

19

1,52

11

1,45

20

1,26

13

1,19

Table 2.Research Questionnaire’s List According to Order of Average
In conclusion, it is understood that associate degree students’ inclination to use technology is on
increase gradually; they are open to using technology and want regulations that shall support using technology in
the school. It is also understood that they complain about lack of sources such as library, database that they need
to prepare project or do homework.

292

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9, 2010 Sarajevo

References
Aksüt M. Nihat Çakın,Đbrahim Battal,Özgür Tuğyan. "Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Ödev Hazırlamada Đnternet
Kullanımına Đlişkin Tutumları" 10.Türkiye Đnternet Konferansı. 9.10.11 Aralık 2005. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Đstanbul. inettr.org.tr/inetconf10/bildiri/77.docĐ.
Driscoll M. &amp; Dick W. (1999). New Research Paradigms in Instructional Technology: An Inquiry. ETR&amp;D, 47(2), pp. 7-18.
Gentry, C.G. (1995). “Educational Technology: A question of Meaning. Part 1 in Instructional Technology: Past, Present,
and Future, G. J. Anglin (Ed.), (2nd ed.), Englewood, CO, Libraries Unlimited.
Özdaş, A. (1997). Öğretim Đlke ve Yöntemleri, http://www.dersimiz.com/eyazim/yazi.asp?id=64
Özdaş, Ali, Öğretim Đlke ve Yöntemleri, Đstanbul 1997

293

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22645">
                <text>709</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22646">
                <text>The Level of Using Technology for Pre-Graduate Students While Preparing  Assignments</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22647">
                <text>AKDEMİR, Ahmet Ocak
ÖZDEMİR, M. Emin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22648">
                <text>The aim of this study is to determine the level of using  technology of Pre-Graduate students likewise internet and other basic  technology resources while they are preparing their assignments. The  centre of the research is Pre-Graduate students of AICUNI (Ağrı Ibrahim  Çeçen University), Vocational Training School of Ağrı.  Students have opportunities of accessing some other resources different  from books and papers with the help of developing informative  technologies finding their way through educational settings. Contrary to  traditional teaching/learning methods, developing technologies, especially  educational technologies, make it unavoidable for students to use them  while preparing assignments. While evaluated as information resources,  technologies such as internet and TV undoubtedly provide great  convenience to students for their individual studying. However there exist  some obstacles in the technology use for students such as access to  technology, know-how of tools, anxiety level etc.  With the questionnaires that are applied to our students of Pre-Graduate  students of AICUNI (Ağrı Ibrahim Çeçen University), Vocational Training  School of Ağrı we tried to determine the level of using technologies while  they are preparing assignments.  Determining their level of using technology will be useful for teachers and  lecturers to understand students’ tendencies about internet and other  technological resources as educational materials.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22649">
                <text>2010-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22650">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1540" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2102">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/f74b0d75111f438a94c289b8dfce1a94.pdf</src>
        <authentication>36b18c1eb6bc2f0bfebe66e168a054bf</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="12436">
                    <text>International Conference on Economic and Social Studies, 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

The Limits of the SCO: Rethinking the Enlargement
Dilemma and Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy
Shatlyk Amanov
Melikşah University, Kayseri - TURKEY
shatlyk@meliksah.edu.tr
The question of whether the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO),
which has been seen by some scholars as the Russo-Chinese “strategic
partnership”, can manage both deepening and widening of the
organization simultaneously has been a central concern of many public
and academic debates in recent years. Since its debut, SCO proved to be a
potential platform where upon Beijing – Moscow cooperation on a wider
Central Asia was enhanced further. Although the differences in the areas
of security, foreign policy and trade orientations of the member states
impede furthering the coordinated efforts towards enlargement, the SCO
members and observers alike, share lots of ideals and are longing for a
similar future for this extremely vast region. Nevertheless, it still remains
to be seen whether the expansion of the organization would facilitate or
make it more difficult in achieving and sustaining coherent policies among
the member countries. In a time of global economic crisis and drastic
changes in its immediate neighbors linked to the Arab Spring, the question
of enlargement renders a bunch of challenges and intricate choices,
among one of which is the recent overtures made by Turkey for joining
the SCO as an alternative to the European Union (EU). This paper
discusses the development of the SCO as an organization by analyzing first
its founding principles and objectives. Secondly, the work sheds light on
the converging and divergent aspects of the country specific approaches
to the enlargement issue and thirdly, addresses the prospects of Turkish
bid for full member status at SCO.
Keywords: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Russia, China, Turkish
Foreign Policy, Arab Spring, Eurasian Security.

257

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12428">
                <text>1660</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12429">
                <text>The Limits of the SCO: Rethinking the Enlargement  Dilemma and Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12430">
                <text>AMANOV, Shatlyk</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12431">
                <text>The question of whether the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO),  which has been seen by some scholars as the Russo-Chinese “strategic  partnership”, can manage both deepening and widening of the  organization simultaneously has been a central concern of many public  and academic debates in recent years. Since its debut, SCO proved to be a  potential platform where upon Beijing – Moscow cooperation on a wider  Central Asia was enhanced further. Although the differences in the areas  of security, foreign policy and trade orientations of the member states  impede furthering the coordinated efforts towards enlargement, the SCO  members and observers alike, share lots of ideals and are longing for a  similar future for this extremely vast region. Nevertheless, it still remains  to be seen whether the expansion of the organization would facilitate or  make it more difficult in achieving and sustaining coherent policies among  the member countries. In a time of global economic crisis and drastic  changes in its immediate neighbors linked to the Arab Spring, the question  of enlargement renders a bunch of challenges and intricate choices,  among one of which is the recent overtures made by Turkey for joining  the SCO as an alternative to the European Union (EU). This paper  discusses the development of the SCO as an organization by analyzing first  its founding principles and objectives. Secondly, the work sheds light on  the converging and divergent aspects of the country specific approaches  to the enlargement issue and thirdly, addresses the prospects of Turkish  bid for full member status at SCO.  Keywords: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Russia, China, Turkish  Foreign Policy, Arab Spring, Eurasian Security.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12432">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12433">
                <text>2013-05-10</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12434">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12435">
                <text>ISSN 2303-4564     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2129" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17344">
                <text>3581</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17345">
                <text>The Linguistic Impact of Internet on Language Usage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17346">
                <text>Tunçdemir, Enes
Akbarov, Azamat</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17347">
                <text>Over the past a few decades, we have started to experience the linguistic impacts of the latest communication technology which was, most specifically, the Internet and with its different domains. The Internet has become a main free resource which is increasingly being used in almost every faces of our life by different age groups. It includes many domains such as chat rooms, e-mails; broadcasting and so on and every single mean of these communication domains have a clear effect on the future of all languages. Even though using these facilities has enabled us to reach any possible information, it also has brought some disadvantages to the language in use.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17348">
                <text>2013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17349">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>PE English</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="943" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7551">
                <text>3455</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7552">
                <text>THE LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPES OF MOSTAR AND LEUVEN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7553">
                <text>Grbavac, Ivana
Jaspaert, Koen
Słowińska, Dominika</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7554">
                <text>Linguistic landscaping is a pioneering subfield of sociolinguistics exploring language in its written form in urban contexts. Since 1997 (Laundry and Bourhis, 1997), as a swiftly expanding research area worldwide, it has proved to be a relevant instrument for measuring various social and linguistic phenomena in multiethnic and multicultural ecologies (Backhaus, 2007; Ben-Rafael e.a., 2006; Edelman, 2010; Grbavac, 2012; Pavlenko, 2010 etc.) This paper aims at a comparative analysis of the linguistic landscapes of two seemingly different sociolinguistic surroundings: the city of Mostar in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the city of Leuven in Belgium. The motivation and justification for this research lies in the fact that the linguistic landscapes of these two cities have not been inspected so far through the LL research methods. Furthermore both cities are embedded in similar yet different political, ideological, cultural, social and linguistic settings. Therefore the aim of the paper is to outline the similarities and differences of these two sociolinguistic contexts visible in the linguistic landscape. We propose the hypothesis that the two linguistic landscapes will show some similarities in language usage patterns and in the collective identity construction modes. Both LLs are set in regions where different languages and cultures are intertwined, therefore we expect to find some possibly universal matrices. Additionally, the contribution of this paper is to be seen in the documentary value of the research.    Key words: linguistic landscape, comparative studies, multiethnic ecologies, linguistic diversity</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7555">
                <text>2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7556">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>PE English</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
