<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=17" accessDate="2026-06-11T14:34:19+01:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>17</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>3494</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3442" public="1" featured="1">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4244">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/991c7df78e8a5b2b8a046dee14445169.docx</src>
        <authentication>f518d620d1fae70125c56ff717d11ad2</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26245">
                  <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26605">
                  <text>2637-2835</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="98">
              <name>DOI</name>
              <description>Digital object identifier</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26606">
                  <text>10.14706</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26607">
                  <text>International Burch University</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26608">
                  <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering (JONSAE) is a peer-reviewed, biannually published international journal focusing on empirical and theoretical research in all branches of Engineering and Natural Sciences. It is published on the behalf of Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences of International Burch University and aims to provide the best content regarding by publishing original research papers, review articles, special issues, feature articles, and book reviews. All manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous referees. All peer review is double-blind and submission is online. The journal welcomes theoretical, applied, interdisciplinary and methodological work, with preference on empirical research, critical approach and problem-solving methods in manuscripts.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26609">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26273">
                <text>Intrusion Detection System for Smart Meters in Power Distribution Network Based on Statistical Anomaly Detection </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26274">
                <text>Mirza Šarić</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26275">
                <text>Amila Jašari</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26276">
                <text>Ammar Arpadžić</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26277">
                <text>Abstract – Recently, there have been significant changes in the power system operation and management. These changes are driven by deregulation and market liberalization policies and include significant technical innovations and introduction of information and communication technologies to power systems. The introduction of smart meters and advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) presents new challanges. Two most sensitive aspects of smart meters are electricity consumption data and remote switch access. This paper presents and overview of security challanges for the smart meters used in power distribution system and proposes a fuzzy intrusion detection system for smart meters in power distribution system based on statistical anomaly detection, based on Mamdani type fuzzy inference system with two input (Elapsed Session Time and Login Frequency) variables and one output variable used as intrusion detection control signal.  It is argued that this paper makes a contribution towards understanding and design of comprehensive intrusion detection technologies for smart meters. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26278">
                <text>Keywords -  AMI, Power distribution network, fuzzy logic, intrusion detection, risk model, smart meter.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26279">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26280">
                <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3441" public="1" featured="1">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4243">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/930c9f630753e1ebc1a5b1fb8041a6ca.docx</src>
        <authentication>41c97aa1761372a73a852990e5057c4e</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26245">
                  <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26605">
                  <text>2637-2835</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="98">
              <name>DOI</name>
              <description>Digital object identifier</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26606">
                  <text>10.14706</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26607">
                  <text>International Burch University</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26608">
                  <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering (JONSAE) is a peer-reviewed, biannually published international journal focusing on empirical and theoretical research in all branches of Engineering and Natural Sciences. It is published on the behalf of Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences of International Burch University and aims to provide the best content regarding by publishing original research papers, review articles, special issues, feature articles, and book reviews. All manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous referees. All peer review is double-blind and submission is online. The journal welcomes theoretical, applied, interdisciplinary and methodological work, with preference on empirical research, critical approach and problem-solving methods in manuscripts.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26609">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26265">
                <text>Implementation of Graham’s Scan Method for Triangulation of Non Convex Polygons in Java Netbeans Environment&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26266">
                <text>Faruk Selimović</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26267">
                <text>Muzafer Saračević</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26268">
                <text>Vesad Doljak</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26269">
                <text>Abstract - This paper presents an algorithm for triangulation of non-convex polygons on the principle of Graham’s scan. This method is based on finding the so-called "ear" of triangulation of the observed polygons. Second aspect is storing in a temporary stack all the previous points of the polygon from which would later be pulled the diagonals that will actually create the triangulations. Triangulation of the polygon has increasing application in the design of the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and it is the basis for calculating the surface of irregular terrains. In particular, we have implemented mentioned method in Java Net Beans environment with a graphical user interface. Java, as one of the leading object-oriented programming languages allows efficient implementation of this algorithm, and it is one of the main reasons of implementation of this algorithm in this programming language. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26270">
                <text>Keywords - Polygon triangulation, Graham’s scan method, non-convex polygon, Java Net-Beans environment.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26271">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26272">
                <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3440" public="1" featured="1">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4272">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/a9c60f561a4c20da19f9c16a5a311733.docx</src>
        <authentication>f620604759bfc76f080585af4886ce43</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26245">
                  <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26605">
                  <text>2637-2835</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="98">
              <name>DOI</name>
              <description>Digital object identifier</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26606">
                  <text>10.14706</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26607">
                  <text>International Burch University</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26608">
                  <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering (JONSAE) is a peer-reviewed, biannually published international journal focusing on empirical and theoretical research in all branches of Engineering and Natural Sciences. It is published on the behalf of Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences of International Burch University and aims to provide the best content regarding by publishing original research papers, review articles, special issues, feature articles, and book reviews. All manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous referees. All peer review is double-blind and submission is online. The journal welcomes theoretical, applied, interdisciplinary and methodological work, with preference on empirical research, critical approach and problem-solving methods in manuscripts.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26609">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26254">
                <text>Effect of initial bacterial innoculum density on zones of inhibition in disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26255">
                <text>Aldijana Hadžić</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26256">
                <text>Nudžejma Kudić</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26257">
                <text>Monia Avdić</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26258">
                <text>Lejla Smajlović-Skenderagić</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26259">
                <text>Alisa Smajović</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26260">
                <text>Samra Međedović</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26261">
                <text>Abstract - The primary objective of this study was to show how the density of the initial bacterial inoculum effects the zone inhibition in Disk diffusion Bauer Kirby (BK) antibiotic susceptibility testing. In this study, three strains of Staphylococcus aureus were tested: a methicillin sensitive clinical strain, a methicillin resistant clinical strain and ATCC 25923. A series of decreasing initial inoculum densities of the three tested strains were prepared and poured onto Mueller Hinton agar plates. After overnight incubation the zones of inhibition around tested antibiotics from different inoculum densities were measured in mm. The results showed that inoculum density does have an effect on the zones of inhibition in BK antibiotic susceptibility testing of S.aureus where in the case of gentamycin sensitivity category change occurred. Correlation analysis showed that there is significant negative correlation between tested inoculum densities and zones of inhibition clinical methicillin sensitive strain of S.aureus after using oxacillin and gentamycin (Pearson coefficient were -0.917 and -0.892, respectively), and between tested inoculum densities and zones of inhibition clinical methicillin resistant strain of S.aureus after using ampicillin (Pearson coefficient was -0.960). Hence, initial bacterial inoculum density can be of high relevance in Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion testing and ought to be precisely determined in purpose of adequate therapy ordination.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26262">
                <text>Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, susceptibility testing, McFarland standards, antibiotics, zones of inhibition.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26263">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26264">
                <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3439" public="1" featured="1">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4241">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/5f57abc7b6e791a6ad2a655f3861bf4c.docx</src>
        <authentication>76b2df282ff6c431d0eb5224e8a30c0e</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26245">
                  <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26605">
                  <text>2637-2835</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="98">
              <name>DOI</name>
              <description>Digital object identifier</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26606">
                  <text>10.14706</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26607">
                  <text>International Burch University</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26608">
                  <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering (JONSAE) is a peer-reviewed, biannually published international journal focusing on empirical and theoretical research in all branches of Engineering and Natural Sciences. It is published on the behalf of Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences of International Burch University and aims to provide the best content regarding by publishing original research papers, review articles, special issues, feature articles, and book reviews. All manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous referees. All peer review is double-blind and submission is online. The journal welcomes theoretical, applied, interdisciplinary and methodological work, with preference on empirical research, critical approach and problem-solving methods in manuscripts.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26609">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26246">
                <text>TOWARDS A CULTURAL QUARTER:  THE CASE OF MARIJIN DVOR</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26247">
                <text>Lejla Odoabsic Novo</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26248">
                <text>Adnan Novalic</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="26249">
                <text>Maja Popovac</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26250">
                <text>Abstract - Urban development and regeneration that is powered by the idea of culture has become a norm and part of legislation in most European cities since the 1990’s.  This notion has been encored on the development of the ‘Creative City’, a concept envisioned for the new creative class based on the creative economy.  The Creative City approach encompasses a holistic strategic development framework that is often characterized by the insertion of new cultural buildings (most typically museums) in the post-industrial zones or neglected neighborhoods.  It often results in the design of cultural quarters, and the adoption of city branding strategies based on reductive images of the city as a cultural site.  This paper takes on the idea of developing a Cultural Quarter as the first step towards developing a strategic plan for the transformation of the post-conflict Sarajevo and making it part of the European Creative City Network. It takes on Montgomery’s principles of the museum cultural districts and examines the potential of this proposal through Canter’s model for Metaphor for Place.    </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26251">
                <text>Keywords: Creative City, Cultural Quarters, Museums, Urban regeneration, Sarajevo&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26252">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26253">
                <text>Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3438" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4229">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/84432e46baa15f7477548acb0ff56f8e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>42c9fd93f5727dceb19f1e715d10081e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="26244">
                    <text>	&#13;  
	&#13;  

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional Economic
Development: The Case of Bulgaria

Monika Moraliyska
University of National and World Economy
Bulgaria
mmoraliyska@unwe.bg

Abstract:	&#13;   The EU cohesion policy has been a major driver of change
in the Member States, leading to positive effects as growth in
employment, economic development and modern infrastructure.
Since its EU accession in 2007, Bulgaria has been benefiting from
the Union’s investment and structural funds at an increasing speed.
Research shows that not only these funds contribute significantly to
the Bulgarian economy, but they seem to be its major driver.
Without them, the country would have recorded a zero growth in the
EU’s financial framework 2007-2013, and could be dumped in an
economic and social crisis. This paper explores the informational
sources that assess the influence of the EU cohesion policy and its
effects on Bulgaria. The goal of the paper is to make objective
conclusions about the impact of the EU cohesion policy on the
Bulgarian economy and how it has affected the level of economic and
social cohesion between the country’s regions and the most advanced
EU regions. For that purpose, the method of comparative analysis is
applied, as well as a historical analysis..

	&#13;  

Volume 7 | Issue 1 |

Keywords:	&#13;  EU Cohesion policy,
Bulgaria, regional economic
development
JEL Classification: 05, F36,
H77
Article History
Submitted: 16 February, 2017
Resubmitted: 15 June 2017
Accepted: 11 September 2017
http://dx.doi.org/10.14706/JECO
SS17713

5

�Monika Moraliyska	&#13;  

Introduction
Overview of the EU’s Cohesion Policy
The cohesion policy of the European Union aims to support the job creation,
business competitiveness, economic growth, sustainable development, and overall
quality of life in the European regions and cities. It is implemented through three
main funds: the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion Fund and
the European Social Fund. Together with the European Agricultural Fund for Rural
Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, they make up
the European Structural and investment funds. These funds invest in different areas
with the common objective to reduce the economic and social disparities among the
EU Member States. The cohesion policy complements the other EU policies dealing
with education, employment, energy, research and innovation, the environment, the
single market and the like.
The budget of the Cohesion Policy for 2014-2020 is 351.8 billion euros - one third
of the EU’s total budget, which puts it on the second place after the Union’s
Common Agricultural Policy.
The EU’s regions (on NUTS2 leveli) are classified as “less developed” (in which the
GDP per capita is less than 75 percent of the EU average), “in transition” (in which
the GDP per capita is 75-90 percent of the EU average) and “more developed” (in
which the GDP per capita exceeds 90 percent of the EU average). The European
Union can provide 50-85 percent of the total financing of a project, with the poorest
regions getting the highest co-financing rates. The potential beneficiaries of the
funds include public institutions, companies, universities and nongovernmental
organizations.
For 2014-2020 the largest portion of the funds - 182 billion euros - will be used for
the “less developed” regions, which represent 27% of the population in the EU.
These include the bigger part of Poland, the Baltic States, the Czech Republic,
Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Croatia, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Portugal, as well as
southern Italy and northern Greece. For many of these countries, the cohesion
instruments are a key part of their economies (especially Poland, Romania, the
Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary).
The EU’s cohesion policy is very important because it is the investment framework
needed to meet the goals of the Europe 2020.

6

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional Economic Development:
The Case of Bulgaria	&#13;  

	&#13;  
Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in the Union. It is the EU's
major investment tool for creating growth and jobs, tackling climate change and
energy dependence, and for reducing poverty and social exclusion.
This policy underpins the European solidarity, because the bigger part of its funding
is concentrated on less developed countries and regions to help them catch up and its
goal is to reduce the economic, social and territorial disparities in the Union. In
addition to that, the EU’s cohesion policy cushioned Member States from the worst
effects of the economic and financial crisis. It also was of critical importance at a
time of sustained fiscal consolidation and according to estimates, without it the
much-needed public investment in the less developed Member States would have
collapsed by an additional 45% during the crisis (European Commission, 2014a).
The EU’s cohesion policy is also considered as a catalyst for further public and
private funding, because it obliges Member States to co-finance the projects with
funds from their national budgets, and also provokes investors’ confidence.
The EU’s cohesion policy is also criticized. The main argument for its existence is
that the funding it provides would eventually raise the different regions in the EU to
the same level of economic development. But it seems like after decades of
integration and billions of euros' worth of EU investment, a very modest level of
economic cohesion in Europe is achieved.
The reasons for the limited positive impact of the EU’s cohesion funds on the
economic and social coherence of the Union are different. A major problem in
numerous of the Member States is the high level of corruption, which prevent
cohesion funds from being exploited exactly where they would be most useful.
Besides that, Member States in many countries, particularly those in Southern and
Eastern Europe, still experience difficulties in absorbing these funds. In some cases,
the national and local authorities lack the know-how and institutional framework to
successfully apply for these funds, while in others the countries lack the capacity to
co-finance the projects supported by the European Union.
Some experts think that the EU’s cohesion policy is too complex and lacks clear
goals, and that the monitoring of the absorption of these funds has been
controversial, because a full control of the use of the money is impossible (Stratfor,
2015). There are often cases of corruption, where state officials in Member States are
bribed to award EU-financed contracts. In other cases, firms report inflated costs.
There are also cases when infrastructure projects are undertaken just because money
is available, and they are consequently abandoned for lack of use.

Volume 7 | Issue 1 |

7

�Monika Moraliyska	&#13;  

The future development of the EU’s cohesion is unknown, as due to the expected
Brexit, the estimated budget of the Union is going to be decreased significantly, and
the discussions between the Member States are likely to lead to a decision towards
cutting particularly the cohesion policy’s budget. Taking other conditions as equal,
the biggest challenge would be to ensure that its resources are used in the most
efficient way, helping the Member States to emerge from the continuing crisis and
the least developed countries to catch up faster with the others. With a budget of
over €450 billion (including national co-financing) for 2014 - 2020, the European
cohesion policy is expected to continue to be the main investment tool of the Union
and to make the largest contribution for supporting the SMEs, R&amp;D and
innovation, education, low carbon economy, the environment, the fight against
unemployment and social exclusion, the infrastructure and Europe 2020 Strategy’s
objectives for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
Several sources provide information on the European cohesion policy’s effects and
the extent to which it is successful in achieving these objectives. Firstly, there is
quantitative information on the direct outcomes of the projects and measures
monitored by the Managing Authorities responsible for the programs. These
indicators are in the form either of the output produced (f.e. number of new
businesses supported to start up) or the results which they brought to (f.e. the
time/travel costs saved as a result of a new road opened). Secondly, there are
evaluations of particular programs, which assess the effectiveness of the funding
provided in achieving both the immediate objective of the measure and the wider
aim of strengthening the development potential of the places concerned. Thirdly,
there is an empirical evidence from the macroeconomic models that simulate how
the economies function to estimate the effect of the Cohesion Policy, mainly in
terms of main economic indicators, f.e. GDP, employment and trade. This they do
by simulating the way the economy would have developed in the absence of the
Cohesion Policy. There is also research (mainly econometric models) of independent
organizations.

Key Effects of the EU Cohesion Policy in the Period 2007 - 2013
The European Commission has analyzed the effects of the EU cohesion policy for
the programming period 2007 - 2013 and concluded that it has substantially
contributed to the investments in growth and employment in the Member States,
especially when they cut spending in order to balance their budgets in times of crisis.
The Commission’s estimates show that without the EU Cohesion policy the
investments in the most-affected by the economic crisis Member States would have
8

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional Economic Development:
The Case of Bulgaria	&#13;  

	&#13;  
fallen by additional 50%, particularly in the Member States, which count
significantly on the EU financing. In some of them the cohesion funding represents
more than 60% of their public investment budget – Slovakia (over 90%), Hungary
(less than 90%), Bulgaria (over 80%), followed by Lithuania, Estonia, Malta, Latvia,
Poland and Portugal (European Commission, 2014b). Therefore in 2013, the
Commission acted on the crisis by redirecting some of the cohesion funds - more
than EUR 45 billion, to support measures against unemployment and social
exclusion and in favor of research, business support, sustainable energy, social and
education infrastructure.
The empiric evidence suggests that the Cohesion policy funds have had a significant
positive impact on the economic and social development of the EU Member States
and brought to numerous positive effects in the programming period 2007-2013.
In the first place, the cohesion policy of the EU has led to the creation of jobs and
economic growth. The income has increased in the poorest EU regions with GDP
per capita growing in these areas from 60.5 % in 2007 to 62.7 % of the EU average
in 2010 (European Commission, 2016a).
As a direct result of the cohesion policy, 769,900 new jobs were created in 20072013 (Figure 1), and 2.4 million participants in ESF actions supporting access to
employment found a job within 6 months in 2007-2010 (European Commission,
2014b). In addition to that 225,560 small and medium-sized enterprises received
direct investment aid and more than 274,000 jobs were created in SMEs. 97,640
start-ups were supported (Figure 2).
Figure 1: Number of EU Aggregate
Jobs Created by the Cohesion policy
	&#13;  

Volume 7 | Issue 1 |

Figure 2: Number of Start-Ups
Supported by the Cohesion policy
	&#13;  

9

�Monika Moraliyska	&#13;  

Positive effects were also created by the 72,920 research projects that were supported,
and the 35,125 new long-term research jobs that were created. 27,800 co-operation
projects were financed, and 5 million more EU citizens were covered by broadband
connectivity. Concerning the environment, 11,050 projects connected with the
cities’ sustainability were financed. Water supply systems were modernised,
benefiting 4.2 million citizens (Figure 3).
In terms of transport infrastructure, 3,752 km new roads were built (Figure 4) and
20,104 km were reconstructed. Also 335 km of railways were built and 3,128 km
were reconstructed. In addition to that, more than 5.5 million citizens were served
by waste water projects.
Figure 3: Number of People Served by
Water Projects Financed by the Cohesion
Policy

Source: European Commission, Regional Policy,
https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/en/dataset/CoreIndicators-2007-2013-EU-Water-projects-Chart/vziv5wz2

Figure 4: Km of New Roads Built by the
Cohesion Policy

Source: European Commission, Regional Policy,
https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/en/dataset/CoreIndicators-2007-2013-EU-new-roads-Chart/kb97-pmsd

Monfort, Piculescu, Rillaers, Stryczynski, and Varga (2017), cited by the latest
European Commission’s paper assessing the EU cohesion and rural development
policies during the period 2007 - 2013 and their impact on the European economyii,
provide further evidence that the cohesion and structural funds brought significant
gains and contributed to the achievement of a more balanced structure of the
Member States’ economies. The effects have resulted in increased GDP, which was
on average 4.1% higher in the countries that joined the EU after 2004. The highest
impact was found in Hungary (+ 5.3%), Latvia (+ 5.1%) and Poland (+4.3%)iii.
Other positive effects in the long-term are associated with a significant positive
impact on the factors’ productivity, as a result of the direct investments in
technology but also because of the improved business conditions encouraging
investment in tangible and intangible assets.

10

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional Economic Development:
The Case of Bulgaria	&#13;  

	&#13;  

Economic and Social Cohesion of the Bulgarian Regions
Even though the EU’s cohesion policy is contributing to the growth goals of the
Europe 2020 Strategy by creating jobs and reducing disparities across Europe, it is
far from reaching its goals and the case of Bulgaria is an example that illustrates this
policy’s low efficiency.
Even though the legislative framework of Bulgaria’s regional policy is harmonized
with the Europe’s ten years after the country became an EU member, it hasn’t
shown a big progress in reaching even the EU average levels. The comparison covers
both – the economic development in terms of GDP and the social development
measured by the Social Progress Index (SPI).
The comparison of the Bulgaria’s six NUTS 2 regions to the EU28 average in terms
of generated GDP as purchasing power per inhabitant shows that the poorest region
in Bulgaria (and in the whole EU), Severozapaden region (Northwest region), is
under one third of the EU average, and almost 7 times less than the richest one – the
region of Hamburg, Germany (Table 1).
Table 1: GDP by Selected NUTS 2 Regions in the EU in 2014
Country

Severozapaden
Yuzhen tsentralen
Severen tsentralen
Severoiztochen
Yugoiztochen
Yugozapaden
European Union
(28 countries)
Wien
Noord-Holland
Praha
Île de France
Hamburg

Code

Gross domestic product at
current market prices
(Purchasing Power Standard per
inhabitant, Euro)

BG31
BG42
BG32
BG33
BG34
BG41
EU28

8,200
8,700
9,300
10,800
10,800
20,600
27,500

Gross domestic product at
current market prices
(Purchasing Power Standards
per inhabitant in percentage
of the EU average)
30
32
34
39
39
75
100

AT13
NL32
CZ01
FR10
DE60

43,500
44,300
47,500
49,000
56,600

158
161
173
178
206

Source: Eurostat, 2016

At the same time, the draft version of the regional Social Progress Indexiv shows
significant variations within and between EU Member States in terms of access to

Volume 7 | Issue 1 |

11

�Monika Moraliyska	&#13;  

health care, quality and affordability of housing, personal safety, access to higher
education, environmental pollution, etc.
The SPI is an aggregate index of 50 social and environmental indicators that capture
three dimensions of social progress: Basic Human Needs, Foundations of Wellbeing,
and Opportunity. The index framework is identical to the one of the global SPI. It
includes all 272 European regions and scores absolute performance on a 0-100 scale
for each of the indicators included to measure the twelve social and environmental
(not economic) indicatorsv.
The Southeasteuropean states, among which the Bulgarian ones are, are among the
most undeveloped in social terms (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Map of the SPIin the EU in 2016

Gross domestic product
(GDP) per inhabitant, in
purchasing power standard
(PPS)
Gross domestic product
(GDP) per inhabitant, in
purchasing power standard
(PPS), by NUTS level 2
region, 2013 (% of the EU-28
average, EU-28 = 100) (¹)

Source: European Commission, 2016b.

The SPI is the lowest in Bulgaria and Romania. The Bulgarian Southeast region has
the lowest SPI value (38,7), less than half of the highest value of 81,3 in Övre
Norrland, Sweden (Table 2).

12

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional Economic Development:
The Case of Bulgaria	&#13;  

	&#13;  
Table 2: Social Progress Index in selected EU regions (NUTS2) in 2016
Region’s
Region’s name
Basic
Foundation
Opportunity
ID
BG34
Yugoiztochen
42.5
45.8
28.8

EU SPI
38.7

BG31

Severozapaden

44.7

47.0

28.0

39.4

RO31

Sud - Muntenia

43.9

43.3

35.8

40.9

RO22

Sud-Est

43.3

45.5

37.2

41.9

RO21

Nord-Est

43.4

42.3

41.8

42.5

BG42

Yuzhen tsentralen

47.9

49.7

32.7

43.1

BG33

Severoiztochen

46.3

46.7

40.4

44.4

BG32

Severen tsentralen

47.3

49.3

38.7

45.0

RO41

Sud-Vest Oltenia

47.9

45.9

42.2

45.3

RO11

Nord-Vest

49.1

47.9

45.6

47.5

RO12

Centru

51.2

50.1

44.0

48.4

ITF3

Campania

62.0

48.1

37.3

48.6

RO42

Vest

51.9

49.4

45.5

48.9

ITG1

Sicilia

62.0

49.6

37.1

49.1

BG41

Yugozapaden

52.7

54.8

41.3

49.4

FI20

Åland

………….
88.6
72.8

79.8

80.3

DK04

Midtjylland

87.6

73.2

80.3

80.3

FI1B

Helsinki-Uusimaa

84.6

74.0

82.6

80.4

DK01

Hovedstaden

86.6

71.9

84.6

80.9

SE33

Övre Norrland

89.4

73.9

81.0

81.3

Source: European Commission, 2016b

It is also evident that all six Bulgarian regions are among the 15 least developed
regions in the EU in terms of social progress. This is an indisputable empirical proof
that the EU’s cohesion policy goals are far from achieved. On the other hand, its role
as a major factor for regional development should not be exaggerated. The initial low
level of economic and social progress and still ongoing transition to modern
economy in Bulgaria is another reason why the positive progress of the country
towards EU average levels remains almost invisible.

Volume 7 | Issue 1 |

13

�Monika Moraliyska	&#13;  

Estimated Effects of EU’s Cohesion Policy in Bulgaria
There are several different sources providing information about the effects of the
European cohesion policy on Bulgaria. Even though the analyses made by different
official instuitutions and organizations show overall dominating positive impact of
the EU funds on the Bulgarian economy, it cannot be claimed with certainly that the
EU’s cohesion policy has achieved its main goal aim in Bulgaria – to support the
country in overcoming the enormous economic and social underdevelopment that
differentiates the Bulgarian regions from the other European regions.
The allocation from the Cohesion Policy funding for Bulgaria in the 2007 - 2013
period was €6.9 billion. According to the European Commission, it has helped the
country to: create more than 1,300 jobs; serve over 280,000 more people by waste
water projects; enable more than 137,000 persons to acquire or upgrade their
vocational qualification and over 178,000 persons to acquire key competencies;
implement many transport infrastructure projects (incl. Sofia metro extension, Sofia
Airport); improve urban transport for 1,289,744 citizens, mainly in the 6 biggest
cities (Sofia, Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, Pleven, Stara Zagora); improve educational
infrastructure for over 30,000 students; enable more than 398,000 m² of renovated
parks, pedestrian areas, bicycle lanes, playgrounds; provide scholarships to 172,000
students; provide social services in a family environment for more than 51,000
persons; modernise 20 cultural facilities; invest in energy saving measures in public
buildings and schools (European Commission, 2015).
A trustworthy model to estimate the effects of EU’s cohesion policy in Bulgaria is the
macroeconomic model SIBILA - a SImulation model of the Bulgaria’s Investment in
Long-term Advancevi (“long-term" because it evaluates the effects of the investment
in human capital, ICT, R&amp;D, infrastructure and physical capital, which are factors
for long-term economic growth). It is based on the EU approaches to modeling of
the impact of structural instruments, as well as on modern macroeconomic theory
and it is adapted to the Bulgarian specifics. It consists of 170 equations, including
econometric estimates, macroeconomic identities and calibrated dependencies (based
on historical links and applying existing knowledge (ECORYS – CPM – NEW i”,
2011).
The main objective of the model is to assess the net effects of the Structural and
Cohesion Funds (SCF) on the Bulgarian economy (key macroeconomic indicators),
as well as to support the decision-making process concerning the allocation of funds
in the next programming period. It examines the economic development in two
scenarios: baseline scenario in which there is no SCF, and an alternative scenario that

14

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional Economic Development:
The Case of Bulgaria	&#13;  

	&#13;  
considers the SCF funding. The difference between the results of these two scenarios
in terms of economic indicators’ performance measures the net impact of SCF.
In 2017, the Ministry of Finance of Bulgaria presented a report with detailed
calculations of the SIBILA model, encompassing the period of Bulgarian
membership in the EU from 1 January 2007 till the end of 2016. It showed that the
overall effect of the EU investments on the added value of the Bulgarian economy is
highly positive:
- A cumulative increase of 11.5% of GDP by the end of 2016 in comparison to the
baseline scenario with no EU funds (mainly through the positive effects of
government spending on the production, and hence on the induced changes in
private consumption and investments);
- A cumulative increase in the volume of private investment by 22.3% by the end of
2016 compared to a scenario without EU funds (a large part of the measures under
the operational programs are intended for investment; they also lead to additional
investments by the business);
- Reducing unemployment and boosting employment (as a result of the absorption
of the EU funds by the end of 2016 the unemployment rate in the country was 6.5
percentage points lower than it would have been without the inflow of these funds.)
At the same time, the number of employees in the economy increased by 15.2%
towards the end of 2016 compared to the scenario in the absence of EU funds
(almost 390 thousand employed people more);
- Higher wage levels in the country - by the end of 2016 the cumulative increase in
average wages compared to the scenario without EU funds was expected to reach
14.9%;
- Increased export potential of the Bulgarian enterprises (By the end of 2016,
Bulgaria's exports would be by 1.7% higher compared to the scenario without EU
funds. The growth of the export potential is a long-term effect and is related to the
improvement of the quantity and quality of the production factors, which in turn
leads to an increase of the economic growth of the country);
- A positive impact on the state of public finances (increased tax revenues outweigh
the spending related to the absorption of EU funds, such as providing co-financing
for some of the projects). By the end of 2016, the cumulative positive effect on the
budget balance was 2.1 percentage points of GDP. The positive impact is expected
to be sustained in the longer term as the increased production potential, higher
employment and higher income imply higher values of the tax base, and hence
higher tax revenues).

Volume 7 | Issue 1 |

15

�Monika Moraliyska	&#13;  

The positive impact of the EU funds on the the country's economic development
has been highlighted by eminent NGOs working in the economic field in Bulgaria.
They stress on the fact that in the period between the start of the EU’s membership
talks in 1999 and the country's accession to the EU in 2007, the GDP per capita in
terms of purchasing power has increased from 27% to 40.8% of the EU average, and
in 2016 it reached 48.1%. The EU’s cohesion policy has also helped to minimize the
weight of the global crisis and has kept the unemployment rate in Bulgaria low,
while labor productivity continued to increase. Positive effects are also identified in
terms of improvements in various aspects of the business and civil infrastructure in
the country constructed with the support of EU funding. In general, for the 10-year
period of membership, the average annual net transfer from the EU to Bulgaria is
about 4% of the country's GDP and this influx of funds is assessed to be of great
macroeconomic importance given the unfavorable conditions of the global
environment (Center for Liberal Stragtegies, 2017).
However, the effects from the EU Cohesion policy on the Bulgarian economy and
budget are also criticized by economists, arguing that the European funds in the
country are widely considered as a gift or free money, which is not the case (Ganev,
2016). The data from recent years show that the European projects swallow an
increasing share of the national resource and actually worsen the fiscal position of the
country. The costs of the European programs in the country have been increasing
steadily - in 2008 they were less than 1 billion BGN, in 2010 - 2 billion BGN, in
2014 they reached 4.5 billion BGN and in 2015 they boomed to 6.3 billion BGN.
These costs are not funded only by the EU, as annually the state makes transfers
from the national budget to the European programs. This is in practice the
participation of the taxpayers in the European funding.
In 2011 and 2015 the national transfers to the EU funds increased markedly and
reached about 40% of the costs of the European programs. From almost 6.3bn BGN
spent on EU programs in 2015, 2.5 billion BGN were paid by the Bulgarian
taxpayer. And the share of national financing in the EU aid has been increasing at a
high speed. This is a real cost, and when, in some cases, useless projects are
implemented, or projects’ costs are inflated only to increase the absorption rate, this
inevitably leads to a wastage of national resources (Ganev, 2016).
Other deficiencies stemming from the EU funds’ absorption process also led to the
lower efficiency of the EU’s cohesion policy in Bulgaria. The absorption of financial
resources of the SCF in Bulgaria in the first for the country programming period
2007-2013 was accompanied by numerous problems. The absorption rate of
Bulgaria in comparison to the other Member States was low and a major reason for

16

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional Economic Development:
The Case of Bulgaria	&#13;  

	&#13;  
that was the lack of administrative capacity and experience in the procedures of the
operational programs’ project management. Even though the pre-accession programs
included education and training of the employees in national administration, the
administrative capacity was not satisfactory. One of the causes for the initial strong
ineffiency of the Bulgarian administration, responsible for the EU funds absorption,
is associated with its structure that is ineffectively organized into numerous
operational programmes, which leads to the management of the same types of
programmes in a different way and with varying effectiveness. The result is that
many functions are duplicated and there is an increase in the budget costs
(Nozharov, 2016).
Another important factor was the comparatively small competence of the staff in the
Bulgarian body managing the EU funds’ absorption. At least one third of the staff in
the public administration responsible for this activity is appointed without a
competition, and a big part of them is not highly-qualified, which leads to additional
government costs for employees’ re-qualification and support of their work through
outsourcing. In addition to that, there are considerable variations in the wages of
staff responsible for the management of EU funds and the other staff with the same
qualifications and fulfilling the same tasks (the former receiving five times more than
the latter), which leads to a lack of motivaton and ineffectiveness of the financial
processes at the public administration (Nozharov, 2014).
The unpreparedness of the Bulgarian state administration in the EU funds’
absorption process is acknowledged in the latest report of the Bulgarian Academy of
Sciences (BAS), which blames the Bulgarian institutions for the lower-than-expected
results achieved by the country’s membership in the EU. The public administration
was not ready and was unable to learn for a long time to apply the modern
management style of the European Commission. It turned to be inadequately
trained professionally, unsufficiently expeditious and unable to defend its
independence from other state institutions and corporate interests, a part of which
was due to the low remuneration of its employees that made them susceptible to
corruption (Economic Research Institute of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,
2017). BAS has also criticized the European institutions for their policies and
requirements to the Bulgarian authorities that have not always been tailored to the
specific characteristics and traditions of the country, as well as to its citizens’
preferences. Namely the Institute has criticized the international institutions and
European Commission for the full opening the single European market to Bulgaria,
which at that moment has been an unsustainable and low-competitive economy.
The result of that is a total decline in a number of economic sectors, including a
collapse of production, exports, employment, income, consumption, as well as other
Volume 7 | Issue 1 |

17

�Monika Moraliyska	&#13;  

negative trends as emigration, social polarization, decline in budget revenues and
others. However, this part of the analysis has not been supported by any econometric
model or other mathematical or statistical tool that correlate the above-mentioned
negative trends in the Bulgarian economy after 2007 with the country’s EU
membership, which makes the report’s conclusions unreliable. After all, even the
author of this part confesses that it is difficult to define exactly which of the
Bulgarian economy’s weaknesses are a result of the EU membership or represent the
deteorating consequences from the country’s unsuccessful transition to market
economy after 1989vii.
Kaneva (2015) identifies four different groups of problems that hinder the EU
funds’ absorption process on the Bulgarian side – problems of the beneficiaries, a
human capital problem, organizational problems, and specific for the respective
Operational program problems. Her analysis proves that there are unsolved issues for
both - the beneficiaries and the state administration. Many of the problems discussed
are not reserved to Bulgaria only and could be addressed successfully by researching
and applying other Member States’ best practices.
Another serious problem was that the absorption process in Bulgaria was
implemented in contrary to the main principle of the European cohesion policy,
because instead of supporting the country’s underdeveloped regions, it concentrated
on the richest Bulgarian region. During 2007-2013, the EU allocated more than
81.56% of the its budget to the less favored regions, while in Bulgaria 40% of the
available resources were invested in the most developed one – the Southwest region
(incl. the capital Sofia), and only 7.5% in the least developed (Galabinova, 2015).
The Bulgarian Operational Programs in the 2014 - 2020 period follow the same
logic – the country did not choose to create regional Operational Programs, which
could support the underdeveloped regions, but seven national programsviii. There is a
risk that the investment funds continue to be concentrated primarily in the
Southwest region, which, instead of convergence of the level of development of the
six NUTS 2 regions, will lead to even bigger regional disparities. The city of Sofia
could be differentiated as a separate planning region, while the remaining of the
current Southwest region could merge with the South-Central region. In order for
greater socio-economic effect to be achieved, an analytical unit to assess the socioeconomic impact in terms of defined goals, not in terms of the funds utilized and
activities implemented, could be established (Hadjinikolov, 2015).
Besides that, some sectors of the Bulgarian economy still have not been restructured
and even when the absorption of the EU funding followed the common policies, it

18

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional Economic Development:
The Case of Bulgaria	&#13;  

	&#13;  
was not efficient. The SMEs’ low awareness of the operational programs in the
country was also a hinder and made it necessary to promote further the European
funds’ opportunities (Nikolova, 2014).

Conclusion
Econometric research has showed that the EU Cohesion Policy funding has been an
important driver for the reforms and economic development of Bulgaria since its
accession to the EU. It will continue to play this role, and for the programming
period 2014 - 2020 Bulgaria has been allocated around €7.6 billion in Cohesion
policy funding. The investment priorities have been set out in a Partnership
Agreement with the European Commission and include the raising of the
competitiveness of the economy, research and innovation, transport infrastructure,
urban development, improved water and waste management, employment, raising
the share of persons with higher education, strengthening the capacity of public
administration and the judiciary and promoting good governance (European
Commission, 2015).
However, in general the EU Cohesion policy has failed to achieve or still has not
achieved its main goal: creating a more homogeneous Europe in economic and social
terms. A proof of that are the vast economic gaps between Southern and Northern,
and between Eastern and Western Europe. The record high unemployment levels,
especially among the youth, the vast emigration from Eastern to Western Europe
and the rise of political parties that criticize the European Union and propose to
reverse the process of European integration, is another symptom of the lack of
cohesion (Stratfor, 2015). However, analyses show that this unsuccessful story is
tightly connected with the poorest Member States’ initial economic situation, which
is the case with Bulgaria, and their inability to make most of these development
funds on a later stage.
The result of the analysis shows that the scientifically-proved (through econometric
model) positive effects of the EU cohesion policy on the Bulgarian economy prevail
over the negative, which remain quite hypothethic. The EU cohesion funds are a
very important source of financing for the Bulgarian economy, the possibilities of
which should be used to the fullest to support the economic growth and
employment in the country. For their absorption rate and efficiency to be enhanced,
however, further steps are necessary towards state admnistration’s strengthening,
project management’s improvement, fight against corruption and others.

Volume 7 | Issue 1 |

19

�Monika Moraliyska	&#13;  

References
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Economic Research Institute. (2017). Annual
Report 2017. Economic Development and Policies in Bulgaria: Assessments and
Expectations. Focus topic: “The road to the European Union and the first 10 years”,
Gorex Press, Sofia. Retrieved from: https://www.iki.bas.bg/godishen-doklad-2017%E2%80%9Eikonomichesko-razvitie-i-politika-v-balgariia-ocenki-iochakvaniia%E2%80%9D-fokus-%E2%80%9Cpat
Center for Liberal Strategies. (2017). Ten Years in the EU. Retrieved from:
https://ec.europa.eu/bulgaria/sites/bulgaria/files/ec_doklad.pdf
Consortium „ECORYS – CPM – NEW i”. (2011). Model for Impact Assessment of
the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund of the European Union in Bulgaria
SIBILA: Simulation model of Bulgaria's Investment in Long-term Advance,
Technical Documentation (data used, theoretical framework and model
specification, data used, estimation and validation, technical appendices)
European Commission. (2014a). Cohesion policy 2014-2020. Retrieved from:
http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/what/future/index_en.cfm
European Commission. (2014b). Investment for jobs and growth, Promoting
development and good governance in EU regions and cities. Sixth report on economic,
social and territorial cohesion, Brussels. Retrieved from:
http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion6/6cr_e
n.pdf
European Commission. (2015). Cohesion policy and Bulgaria. European
Commission Regional policy. Retrieved from:
http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/information/cohesion-policyachievement-and-future-investment/factsheet/bulgaria_en.pdf

European Commission. (2016a). Info Regio, Key achievements of Regional Policy.
Retrieved from:
http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/what/key-

20

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional Economic Development:
The Case of Bulgaria	&#13;  

	&#13;  
achievements/#1
European Commission. (2016b). European Social Progress Index. Retrieved from:
http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/maps/social_progress
Eurostat. (2016). Eurostat statistics. Retrieved from:
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/regions/statistics-illustrated
Galabinova, Y. (2015). Implementation of the EU cohesion policy: the case of
Bulgaria. Department of Public Administration, New Bulgarian University, ISSN
1313-4760, Retrieved from: http://eprints.nbu.bg/2877/
Ganev, P. (2016). “Безплатните” европейски средства (“The Free European
Funds”). The Market Economy Institute. Retrieved from:
http://ime.bg/bg/articles/bezplatnite-evropeiski-sredstva/
Hadjinikolov, D. (2015). EU Cohesion Policy and Regional Differences in Bulgaria.
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, “Hanns Seidel” Foundation, Sofia, May 2014.
Retrieved from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61319/, MPRA Paper No.
61319, posted 21 January 2015.
Kaneva, A. (2015). Problems with the absorption of the Structural funds of the EU
by Bulgaria. Economic and Social Alternatives Journal of the University of National and
World Economy, 1. Retrieved from: http://www.unwe.bg/uploads/Alternatives/3Kaneva.pdf
Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Bulgaria. (2016). EU funds in Bulgaria.
Assessment of the macroeconomic effects of the implementation of the programs cofinanced by EU funds.
Monfort P., Piculescu V., Rillaers A., Stryczynski K., &amp; Varga J. (2017). The impact
of cohesion and rural development policies 2007-2013: model simulations with
quest III. Working Papers. A series of short papers on regional research and indicators
produced by the Directorate-General for Regional Policy, European Commission, WP
05/2017. Retrieved from:

Volume 7 | Issue 1 |

21

�Monika Moraliyska	&#13;  

http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2017/06/06-01-2017working-paper-the-impact-of-cohesion-and-rural-development-policies-2007-2013model-simulations-with-quest-iii
Nikolova, I. (2014). Instruments of EU Cohesion Policy for Bulgaria. Economy &amp;
Business Journal of International Scientific Publications www.scientific-publications.net
Department of Economics, New Bulgarian University, ISSN 1314-7242, Volume 8,
2014.
Nozharov, S. (2014). Model of Effective Management of Bulgarian Public
Administration Managing EU Funds. Journal of Economic Alternatives, 4, 64-77,
ISSN: 1312-7462
Nozharov, S. (2016). Social Costs of the Inefficient Management of the EU Funds
for Bulgaria. ECONSTOR, A Service of zbwLeibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
Leibniz Information Centre for Economics. Retrieved from:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/148052
Stratfor. (2015). The Controversial EU Cohesion Policy Falls Short. Retrieved from:
https://www.stratfor.com/analysis/controversial-eu-cohesion-policy-falls-short
	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;   	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  
i

See Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics (NUTS).
Based on a set of simulations conducted with QUEST, a dynamic stochastic general
equilibrium model with endogenous growth and human capital accumulation.
iii
In the EU-15, the impact is more modest but it remains substantial for some Member
States like Greece (+2.2%), Portugal (+1.8%) and Spain (+0.7%) which benefited from
support of the Cohesion Fund.
iv
The index is the result of cooperation among the Directorate-General for Regional and
Urban Policy of the European Commission, the Social Progress Imperative and OrkestraBasque Institute of Competitiveness. It follows the overall framework of the global Social
Progress Index, customised for the EU using indicators primarily drawn from Eurostat data.
It isn’t created for the purpose of funding allocation and doesn’t bind the European
Commission.
v
There are three dimensions of the SPI: 1) Basic Human needs incl: nutrition and basic
medical care; water and sanitation; shelter; personal safety; 2) Foundations of Wellbeing, incl:
access to basic knowledge; access to Information and Communications; Health and Wellness;
Ecosystem Sustainability; 3) Opportunity, incl: Personal rights; Personal Freedom and
Choice; Tolerance and Inclusion; Access to Advanced Education.
ii

22

Journal of Economic and Social Studies

�The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional Economic Development:
The Case of Bulgaria	&#13;  

	&#13;  
	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;   	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;   	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;   	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  	&#13;  
vi

The development of the econometric model for impact assessment of the Structural and
Cohesion Funds of the EU called SIBILA is implemented under project № 0018-ЦИО-3.2
„Development of a model for impact assessment of SCF”, financed by Operational
Programme Technical Assistance.
vii
The authors of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences’ report have also reached the conclusion
that “Bulgaria’s membership in the EU has no other alternative”.
viii
“Good Governance”, “Transport and Transport Infrastructure”, “Regions in Growth”,
“Human Resources Development”, “Innovation and Competitiveness”, “Environment”,
“Science and Education for Intelligent Growth”.

Volume 7 | Issue 1 |

23

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26236">
                <text>3671</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26237">
                <text>The EU Cohesion Policy’s Impact on Regional  Economic Development: The Case of Bulgaria</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26238">
                <text>Moraliyska, Monika</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26239">
                <text>Abstract: The EU cohesion policy has been a major driver of  change in the Member States, leading to positive effects as growth in  employment, economic development and modern infrastructure.  Since its EU accession in 2007, Bulgaria has been benefiting from  the Union’s investment and structural funds at an increasing speed.  Research shows that not only these funds contribute significantly to  the Bulgarian economy, but they seem to be its major driver.  Without them, the country would have recorded a zero growth in the  EU’s financial framework 2007-2013, and could be dumped in an  economic and social crisis. This paper explores the informational  sources that assess the influence of the EU cohesion policy and its  effects on Bulgaria. The goal of the paper is to make objective  conclusions about the impact of the EU cohesion policy on the  Bulgarian economy and how it has affected the level of economic and  social cohesion between the country’s regions and the most advanced  EU regions. For that purpose, the method of comparative analysis is  applied, as well as a historical analysis..</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26240">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26241">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="98">
            <name>DOI</name>
            <description>Digital object identifier</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26242">
                <text>doi: 10.14706/JECOSS17713     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26243">
                <text>ISSN 1986 – 8502, </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>HC Economic History and Conditions</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3436" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4228">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/4ce28b0fff49ebb7a29c02148a526424.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4add604498f6a7f271a27a642976b7f1</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="26233">
                    <text>Assessment of the Teachers of Social Sciences Education at Grade Four and
Five by the Pre-Service Teachers as for Teachers’ Use of Teaching Strategies,
Methods-Techniques and Equipment
Ahmet NALÇACI
Muhammet Hanifi ERCOŞKUN
Fatih BEKTAŞ
Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty
Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
ercoskun@atauni.edu.tr

Abstract: This study explores to what extent primary school teachers use teaching
strategies, methods-techniques and equipment in primary school grade four and five in
Social Sciences Education course. To collect data, an in-class observation form was used.
It consists of personal information, the teaching strategies, methods-techniques and
equipment. The participants of the study are the pre-service teachers at the department of
Primary Education at Atatürk University. They have taken the “Social Sciences
Education” and “School Experience” courses. The pre-service teachers have filled in the
observation forms by observing the primary school teachers in the classroom. The data
were analyzed by means of SPSS statistical program and some suggestions were made.
Key words: Social Sciences, Teaching Strategies, Teaching Methods and Techniques.

Introduction
Teachers use different teaching strategies, method-technique and equipment so that students reach the
objectives set. Selection and efficient application of the teaching strategies, method-technique and equipment affect
success of students directly. There is no common and single teaching strategy, method-technique and equipment in
teaching various subjects. The objectives affect content, number of the students, student-teacher qualities and other
similar variables, selection of teaching strategy, method-technique and equipment. What important is that teacher is
to be capable of choosing and applying the most suitable ones for learning-teaching process (Tok, 2006: 132; İşman
ve Eskicumalı, 2006: 74; Erden, 97; Tan, 2005: 76; Doğanay, 2007: 162; Yaşar ve Gültekin, 2009: 78-89; Yel,
Taşdemir ve Yıldırım, 2008: 38; Saban, 2002: 247; Demirel ve Yağcı, 2005: 79).
Teaching strategy, method-technique and equipment were analyzed in different studies. Gömleksiz (2006:
118-120) put forward that while determining education strategies teachers should choose approaches through which
students can develop a positive attitude towards the lesson and use technological equipment applicable for the lesson.
Tay (2004: 11) concluded that event, phenomenon, concept and dates in the curriculum of social studies are easier to
learn when explanation strategies are used. Kan (2006: 543) stated that learning based on cooperation is important in
that students adapt social studies, questioning understanding is gained via problems solving and material usage
provides students’ concentration. Doğan (2004) concluded that the most applied and chosen teaching methods are
question-answer, explaining, discussion and problem solving. Emir (2005: 243) pointed out that application of
different methods, techniques and equipment contributes to learning. Yaşar (2004: 118) stated that if one wants to
make use of visual, visual-audial materials at most in subjects of geography in social studies, these materials should
be suitable for the objectives of the lesson and student development characteristics. Öztürk and Baysal (2008) found
out that except for monotone explaining, book study and excursion-observation activities made rarely, there is a
difference between the frequency of teaching activities applied by teachers in the lesson and students’ level of

107

�attitude towards social studies. Yeşil (2005: 963) stated that teachers are unable to choose convenient equipment and
methods for the lesson objectives and quality of the subject.
Most of the studies on teaching strategy, method-technique and equipment applied in social sciences focus
on the opinions of teachers and students. But not so many studies made via observation of teaching strategy, methodtechnique and equipment applied by teachers in social sciences were carried out. In this study, observations of class
teacher candidates were asked to specify teaching strategy, method-technique and equipment in teaching social
studies lesson by the teachers teaching for the 4th and 5th grade students.

Method
Study population consists of candidate teachers studying in the department of Classroom Teaching of
Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty in Atatürk University in the academic year 2008-2009. In the sampling formed
of 210 candidate teachers picked up randomly –namely, with a chance method- and studying in formal and evening
education of the 3th and 4th grades observation form was used.
Researchers made a likert-type classroom observation form. Pre-application of this form was made in 40
individuals picked up from the study population. For validity, opinions of experts concerned were asked. Cronbach
Alfa parameter was counted as 0.89 in credibility analysis.

Findings
According to findings, class teachers apply school book and work books among teaching strategy, methodtechnique and equipment in social studies. Various findings about teachers according to the opinions of candidate
teachers follow as in tables below.

Gender
Teaching Strategies
Teaching Method-Technique
Equipment

Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female

n

X

sd

95
115
95
115
95
115

8.46
8.69
22.57
22.42
42.76
43.83

1.443
1.471
4.010
4.251
7.027
6.844

t

p

-1.107

0.270

0.263

0.793

-1.112

0.267

Table 1: According to the opinions of teacher candidates, arithmetic average, standard deviation and t-score
of teaching strategy, method-technique and equipment applied by 4th and 5th grade teachers in terms of their gender.
In table 1, there is not a remarkable difference – just at an importance level of 0.05- about opinions of the
teaching strategy, method-technique and equipment applied by class teachers in social studies according to their
gender. It can be concluded from this finding that class teachers do not think differently in terms of teaching strategy,
method-technique and equipment they used.

Class Level
Teaching Strategies
Teaching Method-Technique
Equipment

108

Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 4
Grade 5

n

X

sd

124
86
124
86
124
86

8.29
9.01
21.64
23.71
43.15
43.63

1.436
1.393
3.968
4.084
6.927
6.969

t

p

-3.624

0.000

-3.677

0.000

-0.495

0.621

�Table 2: According to the opinions of teacher candidates, arithmetic average, standard deviation and t-score
of teaching strategy, method-technique and equipment applied by 4th and 5th grade teachers in terms of the class
level.
When the table was analyzed, it was found out that a remarkable difference –at for the benefit of 5th grade
teachers between their average of teaching strategy and method-technique and class levels. But teachers’ opinions
about the same equipment issue do not vary much -at an importance level of 0.05. According to this finding, it can be
said that teachers do not think differently in terms of the equipment they applied.
Variance Analysis
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
p
Between Groups
57.833
2
28.917
Teaching
15.462
0.000
Within Groups
387.124
207
Strategies
1.870
Total
444.957
209
Between Groups
642.879
2
321.439
Teaching
Method22.712
0.000
Within Groups
2929.578
207
14.153
Technique
Total
3572.457
209
Between Groups
1506.632
2
753.311
Equipment
18.271
0.000
Within Groups
8534.692
207
41.230
Total
10014.314
209
Table 3: According to the opinions of candidate teachers, variance analysis about teaching strategy,
method-technique and equipment applied in teaching social studies in terms of proficiency of teachers.
When the table is analyzed, there is a remarkable difference of an importance level of 0.05 between
opinions of candidate teachers in teaching strategy applied in teaching social studies in terms of proficiency of
teachers. Tukey test was made to find out between which groups this difference was. The ratio of individuals saying
‘yes’ was higher than that of individuals saying ‘partly’ or ‘no’. The ratio of individuals saying ‘no’ is was lower
than that of individuals saying ‘partly’ or ‘yes’. Increase of proficiency of teachers in teaching social studies can be
interpreted in a way that it affects their attitudes towards teaching strategy, method-technique and equipment
positively.

Conclusions
1. According to findings class teachers apply school book and work books among teaching strategy,
method-technique and equipment in social studies. Social Studies program was prepared in accordance with the
constructive approach and it requires that students should be active during learning process. But from these findings,
it can be concluded that teacher-based education is more common in schools.
2. There is not a remarkable difference – just at an importance level of 0.05- about opinions the teaching
strategy, method-technique and equipment applied by class teachers in social studies according to their gender.
3. It was found out that a remarkable difference –at for the benefit of 5th grade teachers between their
average of teaching strategy and method-technique and class levels. But teachers’ opinions about the same
equipment issue do not vary much -at an importance level of 0.05.
4. There is a remarkable difference of an importance level of 0.05 between opinions of candidate teachers in
teaching strategy applied in teaching social studies in terms of proficiency of teachers.

Suggestions
1. Some qualitative studies can be carried out to find out the reasons why teachers use teaching strategy,
explaining and question-answer method and school book and work books among equipments in the most presenting
way.
2. Some studies can be carried out to find out the reasons why there is a remarkable difference about the
teaching strategy and method-techniques used by teachers for the benefit of 5th grade teachers
3. In-service training can be organized for class teachers on teaching social studies.

109

�References
Demirel, Ö. Seferoğlu, S. S. &amp; Yağcı, E. (2005). Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme, Ankara: Pegem A Yayınları,
5.Baskı.
Doğan, C. (2004). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Derslere İlişkin
http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/arsiv/2004_cilt2/sayi_2/193-203.pdf

Görüşleri

ve

Tercih

Ettikleri

Öğretim

Yöntemleri,

Doğanay, A. (2007). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık, 1.Baskı.
Emir, S. (2005). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretiminde Görsel Materyallerin Erişeye, Tutuma ve Yaratıcı Düşünmeye Etkisi, XIV: Ulusal
Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, Cilt: 2 (238-244).
Erden, M. [t.y]. Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi, İstanbul: Alkım Yayınevi.
Gömleksiz, M. N. (2006). Sosyal Bilgiler Dersine İlişkin Öğrenci Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi, Abant İzzet Baysal
Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı:2, Cilt:6 (106-122).
İşman, A. &amp; Eskicumalı, A. (2006). Eğitimde Planlama ve Değerlendirme, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık, 5.Baskı.
Kan, Ç. (2006). Etkili Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi Arayışı. Gazi Üniversitesi, Kastamonu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı:2, Cilt:14
(537-544).
Öztürk, C. &amp; Baysal, N. (2008). İlköğretim 4-5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Bilgiler Dersine Yönelik Tutumu,
http://egitimdergi.pamukkale.edu.tr/makale/say%C4%B16/2 %C4%B0LK%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%204.pdf
Saban, A. (2002). Öğrenme Öğretme Süreci Yeni Teori ve Yaklaşımlar, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2.Baskı.
Tan, Ş. (2005). Öğretimde Planlama ve Değerlendirme, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık, 9.Baskı.
Tay, B. (2004). Sosyal Bilgiler Dersinde Anlamlandırma Stratejilerinin Yeri ve Önemi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Kırşehir Eğitim
Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı:2, Cilt:5 (1-12).
Tok, T. (2006). Etkili Öğretim İçin Yöntem ve Teknikler (Editör: Ahmet DOĞANAY ve Emin KARİP) Öğretimde Planlama ve
Değerlendirme, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık, 1.Baskı.
Yaşar, O. (2004). İlköğretim Sosyal Bilgiler Derslerinde Görsel Materyal Kullanımı İle Coğrafya Konularının Eğitim ve
Öğretimi, Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Sayı: 163, Ankara (104-120).
Yaşar, Ş., &amp; Gültekin, M. (2009). Anlamlı Öğrenme İçin Etkili Öğretim Stratejileri. (ed. C. Öztürk) Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi
Demokratik Vatandaşlık Eğitimi (1.Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Yel, S., Taşdemir, A. &amp; Yıldırım, K. (2008). Sosyal Bilgilerde Öğretim Strateji, Yöntem ve Teknikleri. (ed. B. Tay ve A. Öcal)
Özel Öğretim Yöntemleriyle Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi (1.Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.
Yeşil, R. (2005). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenlerinin Öğrenme-Öğretme İlkelerinden Yararlanma Yeterlikleri, XIV: Ulusal Eğitim
Bilimleri Kongresi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, Cilt: 2 (958-966).

110

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26227">
                <text>349</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26228">
                <text>Assessment of the Teachers of Social Sciences Education at Grade Four and Five by the Pre-Service Teachers as for Teachers’ Use of Teaching Strategies, Methods-Techniques and Equipment</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26229">
                <text>NALÇACI, Ahmet
ERCOŞKUN, Muhammet Hanifi
BEKTAŞ, Fatih</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26230">
                <text>This study explores to what extent primary school teachers use teaching  strategies, methods-techniques and equipment in primary school grade four and five in  Social Sciences Education course. To collect data, an in-class observation form was used.  It consists of personal information, the teaching strategies, methods-techniques and  equipment. The participants of the study are the pre-service teachers at the department of  Primary Education at Atatürk University. They have taken the “Social Sciences  Education” and “School Experience” courses. The pre-service teachers have filled in the  observation forms by observing the primary school teachers in the classroom. The data  were analyzed by means of SPSS statistical program and some suggestions were made.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26231">
                <text>2009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26232">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>L Education (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3435" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4227">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/040844b6690044e0c92783ab83bbbe56.pdf</src>
        <authentication>32259e39096d3050477aa67d378f449a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="26226">
                    <text>1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Financial Development and Economic Growth:
Time Series Evidence from Turkey
Burcu KIRAN
Faculty of Economics, Istanbul University, 34452, Beyazit, Istanbul, Turkey
kburcu@istanbul.edu.tr
Nilgün Çil YAVUZ
Faculty of Economics, Istanbul University, 34452, Beyazit, Istanbul, Turkey
yavuznc@istanbul.edu.tr
Burak GÜRĐŞ
Faculty of Economics, Istanbul University, 34452, Beyazit, Istanbul, Turkey
bguris@istanbul.edu.tr

Abstract: This paper attempts to explore the relationship between financial development and
economic growth for Turkey over the period 1968-2007. For this purpose, we used an
endogenous break unit root test as suggested by Zivot and Andrews (1992) and the GregoryHansen (1996) cointegration technique. The empirical results showed that there is a long-run
relationship between financial development and economic growth.

1. Introduction
The relationship between financial development and economic growth has been debated quite
extensively by economists and policymakers since the studies of Bagehot (1873), Schumpeter (1911) and, more
recently, Mckinnon (1973) and Shaw (1973). The debate has focused on whether financial development causes
economic growth or vice versa or whether a two-way relationship exists. Four different views on the theoretical
link between financial development and economic growth exist (see Apergis et al. 2007):
(i) supply-leading view
(ii) demand-following view
(iii) mutual impact of finance and growth
(iv) no relationship between finance and growth
The supply-leading view supports the belief that financial development has a positive impact on
economic growth (Schumpeter 1911, Gurley &amp; Shaw 1955). Patrick (1966) explains this view as follows: “to
transfer resources from the traditional, low-growth sectors to the modern, high-growth sectors and stimulate an
entrepreneurial response in these modern sectors.” The demand-following view states that finance actually
responds to changes that happen in the real sector (see Friedman &amp; Schwartz 1963, Jung 1986, Ireland 1994).
Economic growth creates a demand for developed financial institutions and services. The third view supports a
bidirectional relationship between financial development and economic growth (see Demetriades &amp; Hussein
1996, Greenwood &amp; Smith 1997). Finally, the last view rejects the existence of a finance-growth relationship
(see Lucas 1988).
The purpose of this paper is to investigate empirically the existence of a long-run relationship between
financial development and economic growth in Turkey by including savings as a third important variable that
affects both financial development and economic growth. For this analysis, we took into account structural
breaks because Turkey started to liberalize its financial system in 1980, opening a new path in terms of financial
liberalization applications and structural adjustment programs. Therefore, on the econometrics front, we applied
the Zivot and Andrews (1992) unit root test and the Gregory and Hansen (1996) cointegration test in the
presence of potential structural breaks.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section II describes the data and model
specification. Section III outlines the methodology used in this paper and reports on the empirical results.
Finally, Section IV gives the conclusion.

81

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

2. Data and Model Specification
To investigate the relationship between economic growth, savings, and financial development in
Turkey, we used the following model specification:

Yit = β 0i + β1i Fit + β 2i Sit + uit

(1)

Yit is GDP per capita, Fit is the measure of financial development, Sit is the share of savings in GDP (a
third important variable affecting finance-growth relationship), and uit is the error term. We used the liquid
liabilities of the financial system ( LL ) , which is the broadest measure of financial development defined as
where

currency plus demand and interest-bearing liabilities of bank and non-bank financial intermediaries divided by
GDP (M3/GDP) as a measure of financial development.
The present study was based on annual data covering the period from 1968 through 2007. All the
variables used were in natural logarithms. The data on savings were obtained from Undersecretariat of State
Planning Organization and the data on other variables have been taken from the World Bank World
Development Indicators database.

3. Methodology and Empirical Results
The main objective of this paper is to investigate the long-run relationship between financial
development, savings, and economic growth in Turkey. First, we analyzed the time-series properties of the data
using Augmented Dickey Fuller ([ADF] 1981) and Philips Perron (1988) procedures. We also implemented the
endogenous break unit root test suggested by Zivot and Andrews (1992). Second, the Gregory-Hansen (1996)
cointegration technique, allowing for the presence of potential structural breaks in the data, was applied.
3.1. Unit Root Tests with and without Structural Break
The ADF test suggested by Dickey and Fuller (1981) is the most widely used unit root test. Perron’s
(1989) criticism of the ADF unit root test is related to a concern that the presence of structural change can
reduce the power of these tests. Assuming that the time of the breaks is an exogenous phenomenon, Perron
(1989) extended the ADF test to allow for a structural break in the time trend, showing that the ADF test is not
able to reject a null hypothesis of the presence of a unit root when the true model is trend-stationary and there is
structural change. A better test was proposed by Zivot and Andrews (ZA) (1992). This test allows for one
structural break and suggests determining the break point “endogenously.” To test for a unit root against the
alternative of a trend-stationary process with a structural break, we employed three versions of the ZA unit root
test. Model A allows for a structural break in the intercept, model B allows for a structural break in the slope of
the trend, and model C combines both structural breaks in the intercept and the slope of the trend. These models
are expressed as follows:
k

Model A:

yt = µˆ A + αˆ A yt −1 + βˆ At + θˆ A DU t (λ ) + ∑ dˆ jA ∆yt − j + eˆt

(2)

j =1

k

B
B
B
B
B
Model B: yt = µˆ + αˆ yt −1 + βˆ t + γˆ DTt (λ ) + ∑ d j ∆yt − j + eˆt

(3)

j =1

k

Model C:

yt = µˆ C + αˆ C yt −1 + βˆ C t + θˆC DU t (λ ) + γˆ C DTt (λ ) + ∑ d Cj ∆yt − j + eˆt

(4)

j =1

where

λ

operator,

is the break fraction calculated as

TB T , TB denotes the break date, ∆ is the first difference

et is a white noise disturbance term with variance σ 2 , k is the number of augmented lags, and

t = 1,....T is an index of time. The incorporated ∆yt − j terms on the right hand side of equations (2), (3) and
(4) aim to remove the serial correlation if any.
intercept and in the trend, respectively, where

82

DU t and DTt are dummy variables for structural breaks in the

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

1 if t &gt; T λ
DU t (λ ) = 
0 otherwise

t − T λ if t &gt; T λ
DTt (λ ) = 
otherwise.
0

and

The break point in the ZA test was selected where the test statistic of the null of a unit root is the most negative
for the t-statistic of the coefficient of the autoregressive variable.
We first tested for the presence of unit roots in our variables by using ADF and PP unit root tests. The
test results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: The results of ADF and PP unit root tests
ADF-test
Variable

Level

Y

-2.244 (0)

PP-test

First
Difference
-6.128 (0) a

-2.392 (1)

First
Difference
-6.129 (0) a

a

-1.831 (3)

-7.061 (2) a

-2.188 (6)

-7.536 (3) a

LL

-1.729 (0)

-7.099 (0)

S

-2.788 (1)

-5.249 (0) a

Level

The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of lags in the augmented term of the ADF
regression and are determined by using AIC information criteria. The number of truncation lags
for PP test is chosen based on the Newey-West method. The unit root tests include a constant
and time trend. a, represents the significance at 1% level.
The results suggest that the time series, including Y , LL and S were not stationary in their levels. They were
stationary at the 1% level of significance after first differencing. However, since the conventional unit root tests
favor the null of unit root when a structural break exists, this study implemented the ZA (1992) unit root test to
determine whether any possible break point in the series changes the stationarity results. The results of the ZA
unit root test are reported in Table 2.
Table 2: The results of ZA unit root test
Variable

TB

tαˆ

γ

θ

k

c

-0.044
1981
-4.475 (A)
3
Y
(-1.886)
b
b
0.259
0.038
1997
-4.382 (C)
3
LL
(2.470)
(2.284)
0.289 a
S
1985
-4.236 (A)
1
(4.398)
b
b
-0.066
0.013
1998
-6.936 (C) a
0
∆Y
(-2.046)
(2.497)
b
b
-7.693 (C)
-0.326
0.087
2002
0
∆LL
a
(-2.248)
(2.157)
b
-6.084 (A)
0.118
∆S
1980
1
a
(2.202)
a, b
c
and represent the significance at 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively. The critical values
for (1% , 5% and 10%) levels are (-5.34, -4.80 and -4.58) for Model A, (-5.57, -5.08 and -4.82)
for Model C from Zivot and Andrews (1992). The numbers in parentheses are t-statistics
and the letters in parentheses indicate the appropriate model based on the results.
The results show that all the variables examined in this study were not stationary in their levels.
Nevertheless, they were stationary at the 1% level of significance after first differencing. The test identified the
break points as 1981 for Y , 1985 for S in years also marked by financial liberalization in Turkey, and 1997 for
LL in the year when a great financial crisis occurred. In all, the unit root tests indicated one order of integration
for the Y , LL and S variables.

83

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Since the series has one order of integration and contains structural breaks, we also used the Gregory
and Hansen (1996) test to accommodate a single unknown structural break in the cointegration analysis.
3.2. Cointegration Analysis with a Structural Break
Gregory and Hansen (1996) proposed a cointegration procedure that allows for an endogenously
determined break in the cointegrating relationship. They provided three alternative forms of structural break:
level shift (model C), level shift with trend (model C/T), and regime shift (model C/S). Their specifications for
our application are as follows:
Model C: level shift

Yt = α 0 + α1 Dt + β1 Ft + λ1St + et

(5)

Model C/T: level shift with trend

Yt = α 0 + α1 Dt + γ t + β1 Ft + λ1St + et

(6)

Model C/S: regime shift

Yt = α 0 + α1 Dt + γ t + β1 Ft + β 2 ( Dt * Ft ) + λ1St + λ2 ( Dt * St ) + et
where

(7)

Dt is a dummy variable equal to 0 if t ≤ θ and 1 if t &gt; θ . The unknown parameter θ

denotes the timing of the change,

α1

denotes the change in the intercept coefficient at the time of the shift, and

t is the time trend. β 2 and λ2 represent the change in slope of the cointegrating equation. Given that the
timing of structural break is unknown a priori, Gregory and Hansen (1996) computed the cointegration test
statistic, ADF*, for each possible break and took the minimum test statistic across all possible break points. We
selected a break date where the test statistic is the minimum�in other words, the absolute ADF test statistic is at
its maximum. The null hypothesis of no cointegration with structural breaks is tested against the alternative of
cointegration. Table 3 reports the results of the Gregory-Hansen cointegration procedure for a level shift, a level
shift with trend, and a regime shift.

Table 3: Tests for Gregory Hansen cointegration procedure

LL
Models
Break Date
ADF *
Model C
1986
-4.942 (0)b
Model C/T
1984
-4.432 (3)
Model C/S
1986
-4.947 (0)c
The numbers in parentheses show the number of lags in the augmented term.
ADF * = inf ADFt (τ ) .
τ ∈T
b

and c represent the significance at 5% and 10% levels respectively.
Gregory-Hansen (1996) ADF* critical values are as follows: Level shift; a (1%) -5.13,
b (5%) -4.61, and c (10%) -4.34, Level shift with trend; a (1%) -5.45, b (5%) -4.99,
and c (10%) -4.72, and Regime shift; a (1%) -5.47, b (5%) -4.95, and c (10%) -4.68.
The results of the Gregory-Hansen cointegration procedure show that the ADF* statistics for LL was
statistically significant in models C and C/S, thereby rejecting the null hypothesis of no cointegration with an
endogenous break date of 1986. The Gregory-Hansen cointegration tests point to the existence of a long-run
relationship between economic growth, savings, and financial development.

Conclusions
In this paper, we examine the long-run relationship between financial development and economic
growth in Turkey by including savings as a third important variable affecting both financial development and
economic growth. On the econometrics front, the endogenous break unit root test suggested by Zivot and
Andrews (1992) and the Gregory-Hansen (1996) cointegration technique, which allows for the presence of

84

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

potential structural breaks, are employed. The empirical results show a long-run relationship between financial
development, savings, and economic growth.

References
Apergis, N., Filippidis, I., &amp; Economidou, C. (2007). Financial Deeping and Economic Growth Linkages: A Panel Data
Analysis. Review of World Economics, 143, 179-198.
Bagehot, W. (1873). Lombard Street, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Demetriades, P.O., &amp; Hussein, K. (1996). Does Financial Development Cause Economic Growth? Time Series Evidence
from Sixteen Countries. Journal of Development Economics , 51, 387-411.
Dickey, D., &amp; Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.
Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
Friedman, M., &amp; Schwartz, A.J. (1963). A Monetary History of the United States, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University
Press.
Greenwood, J., &amp; Smith, B. (1997). Financial Markets in Development and the Development of Financial Market. Journal
of Economic Dynamic and Control, 21, 145-181.
Gregory, A., &amp; Hansen, B. (1996). Residual Based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts. Journal of
Econometrics , 70, 99-126.
Gurley, J.G., &amp; Shaw, E.S. (1955). Financial Aspects of Economic Development. American Economic Review , 45, 515-538.
Ireland, P.N. (1994). Money and Growth: An Alternative Approach. American Economic Review , 84, 47-65.
Jung, W.S. (1986). Financial Development and Economic Growth: International Evidence. Economic Development and
Cultural Change , 34, 333-346.
Lucas, R.E. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics , 22, 3-42.
McKinnon, R.I. (1973). Money and Capital in Economic Development. Brooking Institution, Washington, D.C.
Patrick, H.T. (1966). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Underdeveloped Countries. Economic Development
and Cultural Change, 14, 174-189.
Perron, P. (1989). The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and The Unit Root Hypothesis. Econometrica, 57, 1361-1401.
Philips, P.C.B., &amp; Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regressions. Biometrica , 75, 335-346.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1911). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Shaw, E.S. (1973). Financial Deeping in Economic Development. Oxford University Press, Newyork.
Zivot, E., &amp; Andrews, D. (1992). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis.
Journal of Business Economic Statististics, 10, 251-270.

85

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26220">
                <text>146</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26221">
                <text>Financial Development and Economic Growth:  Time Series Evidence from Turkey</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26222">
                <text>KIRAN, Burcu
YAVUZ, Nilgün Çil
GÜRİS, Burak</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26223">
                <text>This paper attempts to explore the relationship between financial development and  economic growth for Turkey over the period 1968-2007. For this purpose, we used an  endogenous break unit root test as suggested by Zivot and Andrews (1992) and the Gregory-  Hansen (1996) cointegration technique. The empirical results showed that there is a long-run  relationship between financial development and economic growth.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26224">
                <text>2009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26225">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>HB Economic Theory</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3434" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4226">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/ef75c98b8d8bb5795ff7176a4469657a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>04e1034a9e33fe135cdd793bcbff1050</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="26219">
                    <text>The Place and Importance of Cooperative Learning in the Globalizing
World.
Ufuk Şimşek
Atatürk Üniversitesi
Kazım Karabekir Faculty of Education
Social Sciences Education

Ümit Şimşek
Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University
Faculty of Education Science Education

M.Fatih Esen
International Burch University,
Faculty of Education ,
English Language and Literature
Abstract:The aim of education in the globalising world is to cultivate individuals who believe
in the supremacy of the law and democracy and can think freely, who possesses a sense of
personal responsibility and who has developed his skills of utilizing the attained knowledge and
competences all through his life. In order to equip the students with the implied knowledge and
skills, educators are using various methods. Among these methods, the latest and the most
perennial one is the cooperative learning method. In this article, ample information will be given
on the method itself and its critical characteristics, and its role on ensuring social competence and
democratic attitude will be discussed.
Key Words: cooperative learning, globalization,social competence, democratic attitude

Introduction
Like many others, the term globalization doesn’t have a clear cut definition . Having said that, it is also
a fact that the term globalization represents something. This term, which has become well known after M.
McLuhan’s work called Understanding the media, can be understood from economical, social, psychological,
political even philosophical and further different points of view. Ulrich Beck, in the analysis of the term
Globalization, distinguished three different terms which are globalisation, globalism and globality. According to
this, globalisation is a multidimensional and international process. This process includes the formations in areas
of ecology, culture, economy, politics and civil society side to side, but in an irreducable way to eachother and it
indicates that no longer the nation-states but international actors are in the foreground. Whereas the term
globality describes that the countries are connected to eachother through a network of multidimensional
relationship within the framework of “world community”concept. And what is implied by “Globalism” is that
it is an imposition to provide the content of the phenomenon of globalisation to be perceived within the
framework of the world market economy (Sarıbay,2004:38).
Therefore, when globalization is discussed, not only a process led by international actors and the role of
nation-states are undermined but also a political-ideological trend and a social formation, mentioned as “ world
community”,which networks of mutual commitment of societies bring into existence, are
described(Sarıbay,2004:38). Thus, it is obvious that globalisation can not be evaluated as impartially evolving
and as a fact always yielding positive outcomes. Many globalisationists and neoliberal theoreticians claim that
globalisation is a positive progress since it provides capital, business oppotunities, political freedom and freedom
of choice to the consumer. To the opposing opinion, on the other hand, it is a negative process breeding
inequality and indigence(Sasaki,2004:72). Schaeffer argues that globalisation does not create a one-dimensional
process or a more homgeneous world an thus different results drawn may be positive for some and negative for
the others(Schaeffer,2003:11akt Sasaki,2004:72). The vast majority is in agreement with the inevitability of
globalisation eventhough it is disputable whether it creates a homogeneity or not. One of these inevitable areas is
education.

107

�What is understood from globalisation of education is the education method, process and integration
with the countries which are advanced in their government systems. However, this integration process in
education is not competent to overcome the problems brought by globalisation. Education is a means to deal
with not only the matters of adaptation or integration to globalisation but also the problems resulting from
globalisation itself. Education will raise the type of individual who will overcome the globalisation issues.
Societies and individuals are required to have the ability to take preventive measures against the possible
consequences brought forth by globalisation and to benefit from the changes it brings
(http://yayim.meb.gov.tr/dergiler/159/akcay.htm, 2006).
The type of person that globalisation requires has changed. Not the person who stores information but
who uses it has come forward now. Getting hold of information has become easier and cheaper in the globalising
world, therefore, interpreting it has gained actual importance rather than just having
it.(http://yayim.meb.gov.tr/dergiler/159/akcay.htm, 2006).
It is essential for the teacher of this globalisation process to be qualified to educate the individual of this
quality and to be well equipped with the parallel characteristics. It is important for the teachers to make learning
available to students with various cultural backgrounds and weak social abilities, to help them to resolve existing
conflicts through peaceful means, to respect eachother’s personalities and cultural backgrounds and to become
citizens bearing social responsibility. It is possible to say that classical approaches on education are gradually
losing their influence. There is a necessity of model implementations which will ensure the training of
individuals who are sensitive about the lives of students which come from different social and cultural
backgrounds, who believe in the continuity of learning, meaning that it is life long , who have tendency towards
cooperation and groupwork ,and who view learning as a deep personal activity(Yurdabakan,2002:62).
Knowing how to learn, learning how to learn, learning individually, learning as a team and as an
organization are considered as the dominant elements of education. UNESCO Education Commission has added
another element which is “ learning together”. Four principles are discussed in educational globalisation. These
are;knowing to learn, learning to learn, individual learning,and learning how to live
together(Doğan,2002:91;Unesco,1996’dan naklen).
Groupwork is a method which improves individual’s ability to discuss, to agree, to convince and to
communicate with the group and in relation to these it also supports and encourages individual’s managemnet
skills.

1. Cooperative Learning
In order an effective teaching process to take place, today’s concept of education brings against the
educators the responsibility of determining the teaching method that will maximize learning and of
implementing it. In addition to this, it is also known that most teachers, within the framework of textbooks in
primary education institutions, are using the traditional teaching method which is based on the participation of
the students as passive listeners. Some teachers, on the other hand, are using the printing method with which
they suppose that they are activating the students(Şimşek, Doymuş, Kızıloğlu 2005). However, the students tend
to adopt the “ cooperative learning method” which provides the teaching-learning environments to be more
effective, efficient and fast, in which the students can express personal opinions freely,discuss matters and listen
to eachother with mutual respect(Doolittle 1997).

1.1. Definition of the Cooperative Learning Method:
The cooperative learning method has been defined in various ways by different scholars of education.
Cooperative learning method is student-centered rather than teacher-centered and defined as a method where the
stundent undertakes the active role (Cooper and Mueck 1990), ..... as a class learning method used to increase
motivation and participation, to help students to develop a positive image related with themselves and their
friends, to improve the power of problem solving and critical thinking and to encourage them in cooperation and
social skills(Gömleksiz 1993)...as a class learning environment where students work in mixed small
groups(Watson 1992)... as a learning approach according to which students, in a class environment, form mixed
small groups having a shared purpose,to help eachother learn on an academic subject and group success is
awarded in different ways (Delen 1998)... as a method considered as the realization process of learning in which
students work in small groups helping eachother learn(Açıkgöz 2003)....as a learning method basing on
cooperative work of students in mixed small groups helping eachother learn (Johnson and Johnson 1992).

108

�Cooperative learning as a concept includes teaching methods where students work in small
groups,usually groups of 4-6, and the efficiency is awarded in different ways(Slavin 1988).
Taking into consideration the definitions above, cooperative learning can be defined as a learning
approach according to which the satudents both in class and in other environments form mixed small groups,
help eachother learn on an academic subject through a common purpose, and by which self-confidence of
individuals improves, their communicative skills develop, the competence of problem solving and critical
thinking accelerates and the student takes part in learning-teaching process in the most active way. (Doymuş,
Şimşek, Bayrakçeken 2004)

1.2Critical Features of Cooperative Learning Methods
Here are the principles that distinguish the cooperative learning from the rest and its essential components:
a. positive commitment
b.face to face interaction
c.individual responsibility
d.social skills
e.the evaluation of the group process
These principles of the cooperative learning method are considered to be the five basic elements which enable
the understanding of cooperative learning and the formation of cooperation among the members (Sharan 1990;
Johnson et al. 1998; Sharan 1999; Schultz 1999; Barken 2001) These five elements should be taken into
consideration and rearranged while implementing the cooperative learning method.

1.3. Benefits of Cooperative Learning Method
Benefits of cooperative learning method are categorized as academic benefits and social benefits.

1.3.1. Academic Benefits
In the process of application of cooperative learning method, as a result of numerous activities which are held
either in the classroom or out of the classroom, various academic developments and changes take place.
Researches carried out on cooperative learning method have put forward that; it cultivates student’s thinking
skills (Webb 1980; Smith et al. 1981; Slavin 1992), it encourages critical thinking and helps the students to
express their opinions throughout the discussion sessions(Peterson and Swing 1985; Nelson-Legall 1992), it
increases student’s abilities and practical skills both in and out of the classroom and it improves theirs skills of
processing information(Johnson et al. 1986; Webb et al. 1986; Male 1990; Brufee 1993; Tannenberg 1995), it
improves students’oral communication skills(Yager et al. 1985-b; Bershon 1992), discussions being held
throughout learning activities help students remember the content of the context(Johnson and Johnson 1979;
Ames and Murray 1982; Dansereau 1985), it increases the responsibility of learning and creates an efficient and
exploratory environment (Slavin 1980; Baird and White 1984; Leikin and Zaslavsky 1997) it provides the
teacher candidates with the training of effective teaching strategies (Johnson and Johnson 1990; Artut and Tarim
2007) it prevents the teachers from being seen as the only source of information(Felder 1997), it encourages the
learning-based rather than race-based approach and it also improves the rate of attendace and the rate of
researches carried out by the students (Janke 1980; Cooper 1984; Davis et al. 1990)

1.3.2 Social Benefits
The cooperative learning method provides a basis for the formation of social experiences of the
individual and the increase of their courage for these experineces. Teacher, in order to form and improve social
skills, plays an active role in students’ interaction with eachother and in fecilitation of the process.
Administrators, school personnel and families form the complementary components of the cooperative learning
process. Through this formation, students who have economic and emotional problems and problems concerning
the family are provided support(Kessler et al. 1985; Carpenter 2003). Cooperative learning, by means of social
support systems and social interaction methods(Cooper 1984; Johnson et al. 1998; Doymuş vd 2004, 2005;
Şimşek 2005)builds and environment that assures positive attitudes towards the solution of problems and
resolution of controversies(Messick and Mackie 1989; Sherman 1991).This method,in the context of

109

�interpersonal relations, improves students’ responsibilities towards eachother and helps to clear away
misinterpretations(Bonoma et al. 1974; Webb 1980; Jonhnson and Johnson 1985; Stahle 1986; Johnson et al.
1998) strengthens empathising and enables viewing events from different perspectives(Swing and Peterson
1982; Slavin et al. 1984; Deutsch 1985; Yager et al. 1985-a; Hooper and Hannafin 1988; Felder 1997) while
maintaining personal responsibility,it helps forming a team by actualising certain approaches to solve problems.
In this process, students put into practice work and community models regarding the roles in their groups(Slavin
1983; Sandberg 1995; Johnson et al. 1998). Implementations of cooperative learning enhances the leadership
skills for both male and female students (Bean 1996) This method makes it possible for the students both
individually and in classroom environments to develop better communication skills and establish academic
relations. (Tinto, 1997). Cooperative learning method, in connection with its above mentions features, helps to
attain a democratic attitude(Şimşek vd 2006;)

References
Açıkgöz, K.Ü., 2003. Aktif öğrenme, Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları, Kanyılmaz Matbaası, 172 s,İzmir.
Ames, G.J. and Murray, F.B., 1982. When two wrongs make a right: promoting cognitive change by social
conflict. Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 894-897
Artut, P.D. and Tarim, K., 2007. The Effectiveness of Jigsaw II on prospective elementary school teachers. AsiaPacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 129-141
Aydın Mehmet S., “Küreselleşmeye Genel Bir Bakış”, Siyasi, Ekonomik ve Kültürel Boyutlarıyla Küreselleşme,
Ufuk Kitapları, İstanbul, 2002, s.11.
Baird, J. and White, R., 1984. Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: a classroom study. Paper
Presented at The Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Barken, J.E., 2001.The Use Cooperative Learning Techniques in a Community College Course. Master Thesis.
Saint Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia.
Bean, J., 1996. Engaging ideas, The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active
Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bershon, B.L., 1992. Cooperative Problem Solving: a Link to Inner Speech, in Hertz-Lazarowitz (eds.)
Interaction in Cooperative Learning. 36-48, Ny: Cambridge Press.
Bonoma, J., Tedeschi, J. and Helm,B., 1974. Some effects of target cooperation and reciprocated promises on
conflict resolution. Sociometry, 37(2), 251-261.
Brufee, K., 1993. Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence and the Authority of Knowledge.
Baltimore. Md: Johns Hopkins University Press. U.S.A.
Carpenter, S.R., 2003. Incorporation of a cooperative learning technique in organic chemistry. Journal of
Chemical Education, 80(3), 330-332.
Cooper, J. and Mueck, R., 1990. Student involvement in learning: Cooperative learning and college instruction.
Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1(1), 68-76.
Cooper, J., Prescott, S., Cook, L., Smith, L., Mueck, R. and Cuseo, J., 1984. Cooperative Learning and College
Instruction- Effective Use of Student Learning Teams. California State University Foundation
Publication, 41-65.
Dansereau, D.F., 1985. Learning Strategy Research, in Chipman and Glaser (Eds). Thinking and Learning Skills:
Relating Instruction to Basic Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Davis, R. B., Maher, C.A. and Noddings, N. (Eds)., 1990. Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of
Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education by National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.
Delen, H., 1998. Temel eğitim beşinci sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersinde kubaşık öğrenme yönteminin akademik
başarıya etkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi ,Adana
Doğan Elife, “Eğitimde Küreselleşme”, Eğitim Araştırmaları, Sayı:6, Ocak 2002
Doolittle P., 1997. “Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development as a Theoretical
Foundation for
Cooperative Learning”, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching; 8(1), 83-103.
Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü., ve Bayrakçeken, S., 2004. İşbirlikçi öğrenme yönteminin fen bilgisi dersinde akademik
başarı ve tutuma etkisi, Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(2), 103-115.
Felder,
R.M.,
1997.
e-mail
Communication
from
Felder@eos.ncsu.edu
www
page
http://www.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/felder/public/rmf.html
Gömleksiz, M., 1993. Kubaşık öğrenme yöntemi ile geleneksel yöntemin demokratik tutumlar ve erişiye
etkisi, Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Adana.
Hooper, S. and Hannafin, M.J., 1988. Cooperative CBI: The effects of heterogeneous homogeneous grouping on
the learning of progressively complex concepts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(5) ,413424.

110

�http://yayim.meb.gov.tr/dergiler/159/akcay.htm, 2006
Janke, R., 1980. Computational errors of mentally-retarded students. Psychology in the Schools, 17(1), 30-32.
Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T., 1992. Approaches to implementing cooperative learning in the social
studies classroom, cooperative learning in the social studies classroom: An Invitation Social study
,R.J., Stahl and R.L., Vansicle Editor : Washington National Council for the social studies. Bulletin
No: 87, 44-51.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and Holubec, E., 1998. Cooperation in the Classroom. Interaction Book
Company.100, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and Stanne, M., 1986. Comparison of computer assisted cooperative, competitive
and individualistic learning. American Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 382-92.
Johnson, R.T. and Johnson, D, W., 1985. Relationships between black and white students in intergroup
cooperation and competition. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125(4), 421-428.
Johnson, R.T. and Johnson, D,W., 1990. Using Cooperative Learning in Math. Chapter in Cooperative Learning
in Math, Ed Neil Davidson
Johnson, R.T. and Johnson, D. W., 1979. Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of
Educational Research, 49(1), 51-70.
Kessler, R., Price, R. and Wortman, C., 1985. Social factors in psychopathology stress, social support and coping
processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 351-372.
Leikin, R. and Zaslavsky, O., 1997. Facilitating student interactions in mathematics in a cooperative learning
setting, 350. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 331-359.
Masamıchı Sasaki, “Globalization and National Identity in Japan”, International journal of Japanese Sociology,
2004, Number:13, (69–87),p.70
Messick, D.M. and Mackie, D.M., 1989. Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40(1), 45-81.
Nelson-Legall, S., 1992. Children's Instrumental Help-Seeking. It's Role in the Social Acquisition and
Construction of Knowledge. In Lazarowitz Ed. Interaction In Cooperative Groups: Theoretical Anatomy of
Group Learning,120-141, NY,NY: Cambridge University Press
Peterson, P. and Swing, S., 1985. Students cognitions as mediators of the effectiveness of small-group learning.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 299-312
Robert K. Schaeffer, Understanding Globalization: The Social Consequences of Political, Economic And
Environmental Change. Lanham, 2003,p.11
Sandberg, K.E., 1995. Affective and Cognitive Features of Collaborative Learning in Review of Research and
Developmental Education. Gene Kierstons (Ed.) 6,4, Appalachian State Univ, Boone, NC.
Sarıbay Ali Yaşar, Global Toplumda Din ve Türkiye, Everest Yayınları, İstanbul, 2004, s.38
Schultz, S.E., 1999. To Group or Not to Group: Effects of Group Work on Students’ Declarative and Procedural
Knowledge in Science. Doctoral Dissertation, the Scholl of Education, Stanford University, Palo Alto,
California.
Sharan, Y., 1990. Cooperative Learning Theory and Research. Praeger Publishers, Westport, 20,USA.
Sharan, Y., 1999. Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods. Praeger Publishers, Westport, 20,USA.
Sherman, L.W., 1991.Cooperative learning in post secondary education: implications from social psychology for
active learning experiences. Presented At The Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research
Association, Chicago, II, April 1991.
Slavin, R. E., 1980. Cooperative learning. Review of Education Research, 50(2), 315-342.
Slavin, R. E., 1983. When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94,
429-445
Slavin, R. E., Leavey, M.B. and Madden, N.A., 1984. Combining cooperative learning and individualized
instructions: Effects of student mathematics achievement, attitudes and behaviors, Elementary School
Journal, 84(4), 409-422 .
Slavin, R.E., 1988. Small group methods, The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher
Education, Oxford: Pergamon pres.
Smith, K., Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., 1981. Can conflict be constructive: Controversy versus
concurrence seeking in learning groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 651-663 .
Şimşek U., Doymuş K., Şimşek Ü., Özdemir Y., "Lise Düzeyinde Eğitim Gören Öğrencilerin Demokratik
Tutumlarına İşbirlikçi Öğrenme Yönteminin Etkisinin İncelenmesi", Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler
Enstitüsü Dergisi, Yıl:2006,Cilt.7, Sayı:1,s.165-173
Şimşek, Ü., 2005. İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yönteminin Fen Bilgisi Dersinin Akademik Başarı ve Tutumuna Etkisi.
Yüksek Lisans Tezi , Erzurum.
Şimşek, Ü., Doymuş ,K. ve Kızıloğlu N., 2005. Lise düzeyinde öğrenim gören öğrencilere grupla öğrenme
yönteminin kazandırdığı bilgi ve beceriler. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 13(1), 67-80.

111

�Tannenberg, J., 1995. Using cooperative learning in the undergraduate computer science classroom. Proceedings
of
The
Midwest
Small
College
Computing
Conference,
Available
http://Phoenix.Isub.Edu/Josh/Coop/Papers/Mwscc95.Html
Tinto, V., 1997. Enhancing learning via community, thought and action. The NEA Higher Education Journal,
6(1), 53-54.
Watson, S. B., 1992. The essential elements of cooperative learning, The American Biology Teacher, 54(2),
84-86.
Webb, N. M., 1980. An analysis of group interaction and mathematical errors in heterogeneous ability groups.
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50(3), 266-276.
Webb, N., Ender, P. and Lewis, S., 1986. Problem solving strategies and group process in small groups learning
computer programming. American Education Research Journal, 23(3), 243-262.
Yager, S., Johnson, R., Johnson, D.W. and Snider, B., 1985-b. The effect of cooperative and individualistic
learning experiences on positive and negative cross-handicap relations contemporary. Educational
Psychology, 10(2),127-138 .
Yurdabakan İrfan, “Küreselleşme Konusundaki Yaklaşımlar ve Eğitimi”, Eğitim Araştırmaları, Sayı:6, Ocak
2002

112

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26213">
                <text>659</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26214">
                <text>The Place and Importance of Cooperative Learning in the Globalizing World.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26215">
                <text>Şimşek, Ufuk
Şimşek, Ümit
Esen, M.Fatih</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26216">
                <text>The aim of education in the globalising world is to cultivate individuals who believe  in the supremacy of the law and democracy and can think freely, who possesses a sense of  personal responsibility and who has developed his skills of utilizing the attained knowledge and  competences all through his life. In order to equip the students with the implied knowledge and  skills, educators are using various methods. Among these methods, the  latest and the most  perennial   one is the cooperative learning method. In this article, ample information will be given  on the method itself and its critical characteristics, and its role on ensuring social competence and  democratic attitude will be discussed.  </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26217">
                <text>2009-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26218">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>L Education (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3433" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4225">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/7e728817cd66badc6f2ff95e0bd68eda.pdf</src>
        <authentication>34f6334327bb8ef08b9a965f85dee50b</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="26212">
                    <text>1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

The Balanced Scorecard in the Healthcare Industry: A Case Study

Yigit Bora ŞENYĐĞĐT
Istanbul University, School of Business Administration, Turkey
senyigit@istanbul.edu.tr
Abstract: The performance measurement and management is an important process for
decision-makers in any type of organization. One of the performance measurement tools
available is the balanced scorecard, which provides a comprehensive set of financial and nonfinancial performance measures for the organizations to be strategy focused. This study
discusses the balanced scorecard generally from theoretical views, and why it should be used
by healthcare organizations. Moreover, the study is enhanced by performing a case study to
examine the implementation process of the balanced scorecard by healthcare (orthopedics)
company in the United States. This study suggests that though the balanced scorecard would
be the right choice for many, including companies in the healthcare industry, it may not be
the right choice for all. With the balanced scorecard being fairly young, it is the common
perception that this approach will continue to be explored and efficiency will be improved on
it in the future.

Keywords: Balanced scorecard, performance measurement, healthcare industry

1. Introduction
Without measuring results, there is no way of knowing whether the business is being managed
satisfactorily, nor is it possible to hold managers accountable for the business. Moreover, it is difficult to reward
success or avoid unintentionally rewarding failure. To date, there have been numerous tools developed for the
purpose of performance measurement. The balanced scorecard (BSC) puts the organization’s vision and
strategy into a framework that effectively and efficiently communicates strategic intent and monitors
performance.
Traditionally, management control stresses decentralized profit goals, which mean that it is mostly
focused on outcomes. In a BSC, outcome measures are combined with measures that describe resources spent or
activities performed. Good scorecards combine outcome measures, of which profit is only one, with
performance drivers.
The BSC assists companies in overcoming two important issues: effective organizational performance
measurement and implementing strategy (Niven, 2002). The first issue is an effective performance
measurement: “If you cannot measure it, you cannot manage it”. Historically, the measurement system for
business has been financial. A key problem with looking at financial measures alone is that it gives only one
particular perspective (Coskun, 2006). In fact, it may even lead to poor decision-making. For example, if one of
the main performance measures is cost per customer, managers may try to cut costs to such an extent that the
customers become unhappy with the products they are buying and will take their business to a competing
supplier. Moreover, financial measures are not consistent with today’s business environment, and are not
relevant to many levels of organization.
Successfully implementing strategy is another important issue facing organizations. A strategy is a set
of hypotheses about cause and effect. The measurement system makes the relationships (hypotheses) among
objectives in the various perspectives explicit so that they can be managed and validated (Niven, 2002). The
BSC is not merely a collection of financial and non-financial measurements. The BSC should be the translation
of the business unit’s strategy into a linked set of measures that define both the long-term strategic purposes, as
well as the mechanisms for achieving those purposes (Kaplan, 2000). In the nature of implementing strategies,
the organization may have some barriers. There are four barriers to strategy implementation that exist for most
companies: a vision barrier, a people barrier, a resource barrier, and a management barrier (Niven, 2002).
The purpose of this study is the increase understanding of how the BSC is used in the healthcare
industry, specifically in the orthopedics company operating in the United States. This paper is organized in the
following manner. Section 2 reviews the literature on performance measurement and management highlighting
the need for the healthcare industry to use both financial and non-financial performance indicators. In section 3,
a short background of the case company is presented followed by a case description. The implementation of the

139

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

BSC is described with respect to how it designed and implemented. Finally, in section 4 the findings from the
study are synthesized and the implementation process of the BSC discussed.

2. Literature Review
The BSC is a management tool that was developed by Dr. Robert Kaplan and Dr. David Norton in the
1990s (Kaplan &amp; Norton, 1992). Drs. Kaplan and Norton recognized the need for businesses to have a more
“balanced” approach of assessing company performance than the traditional method of looking strictly at
financial data (Davis, 2005). While financial data is important, in large part it only gives an indication of
historical company performance. The BSC combines financial data along with non-financial performance
criteria, such as product quality and customer service, in a way that allows businesses to not only track their
performance, but also to align business activities in such a way that they support the organization’s stated
missions and goals (Davis, 2005).
The BSC provides superior financial performance when compared to a traditional performance
measurement system (Albright &amp; Davis, 2004). In contrast to the financial based measurement systems, the
BSC reinforces the organization’s focus on future success by setting objectives and measuring performance
from different perspectives. These balanced perspectives are as follows: customer, internal business processes,
learning and growth, and financial (Kaplan &amp; Norton, 1992). The BSC retains financial measurement, but it
focuses on a more general and integrated set of measurements that link customer, internal business processes,
employee learning and growth, and financial performance to long-term financial success. These four
perspectives are defined as (Hoque &amp; James, 2000):
The financial perspective includes profitability measures such as operating income, return-on-capital
employed, sales growth, and generation of cash flow or economic value added.
The customer perspective encompasses such measures as customer satisfaction, customer retention,
new customer acquisition, customer response time, marked share, and customer profitability.
The internal process perspective includes product design, product development, post-sales service,
manufacturing efficiency, quality etc.
The learning and growth perspective measures the ability of employees, information system and
organizational procedures to manage the business and adapt to change.
The reasons for adopting the BSC in the healthcare industry are due to financial pressure, competition,
consumerism, industry consolidation, regulatory reporting, information management, and new technology
(Inamdar &amp; Kaplan, 2002). Considering the healthcare industry, one can argue that a number of problems face
the healthcare industry, including cost structure, payor limitations and constraints, and performance and quality
issues that require changes in how healthcare organizations, both profit and nonprofit, manage operations
(Kocakulah &amp; Austill, 2007). As these healthcare systems become more complex, so does the task of
developing a methodology and formula that can align the organizational strategies and main principles with
performance measurement and management indicators. The BSC is especially appropriate for organizations in
turbulent industries such as healthcare (Voelker et al., 2001).
A BSC is not only better in monitoring and evaluating performance of a healthcare organization but
also in improving that performance to its maximum best. For instance, by tracking value delivery and paying
incentives to staff based on how much value an organization delivers to customers, rather than the amount or
value received from customers, hospitals can motivate and redirect staff to look for better ways to improve
value of service. This can serve as counter to the possibility of staff motivation to promote short-term
importance on the revenue received from clients. Also by effectively tracking improvement made by patients,
clients and community, BSC can give internal stakeholders such as medical staff and employees a renewed
pride in what they do (MacStravic, 1999).
The BSC is one of the tools for better control and management of organizations in the healthcare
industry. However, the healthcare industry was a little slower to adopt the BSC approach than was
manufacturing and profit-oriented service industries. Although Kaplan and Norton’s first book in 1996 outlining
the BSC included examples, none were healthcare related (Kaplan &amp; Norton, 1996). They simply had not found
any services (Kocakulah &amp; Austill, 2007). In the next section, we perform a case study in an orthopedics
company in the healthcare industry.

3. The Implementation Process of the Balanced Scorecard in the Healthcare Industry
We have chosen to evaluate the unique aspects of a medical device manufacturer when considering the
implementation of a BSC system. As we discussed before, one of the most critical aspects of creating a BSC
system is making sure that it is tailored to the specific needs of the company and the industry in which it
competes. There are several distinctive aspects of the medical device market that will ultimately determine the
metrics used for our BSC implementation. The name of entity used herein is fictional to protect proprietary

140

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

interests and privacy. “Morgan” is the fictional name that represents the company. For this evaluation, we
choose Morgan Inc., a large-cap manufacturer of orthopedic implants used for joint reconstruction. In applying
the four main perspectives of the BSC to Morgan’s business it is also important to look at the medical device
market in general.
Morgan is one of the world’s largest pure-play orthopedics’ manufacturers with annual revenues in
2008 of $1.8 billion. The orthopedic market is mainly made up of total joint replacements (hips, knees,
shoulders, ankles, elbows, etc.) as well as trauma and spinal implants. This market is dominated by five key
players that together account for over 90% of the joint reconstruction market. Having an oligopoly market like
this creates stability, but also makes moving market share incredibly difficult. This market is set for increased
growth over the next few decades, since the average age that a patient will receive a total hip or total knee
replacement is 67, and the average baby boomer is currently 62 years old. Because Morgan manufacturers
implants for human use, quality is incredibly important.
This is also why the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plays such a large role in the company’s
financial performance. The FDA must approve all new implants that Morgan makes. It is subject to continued
oversight of the FDA in the form of product surveillance, inspection checks, and even implant recalls. All of
this points to the need for a high level of quality in the products that Morgan makes.
In addition to a need for high quality, the medical device market in which Morgan does business is
incredibly lucrative. Morgan’s annual gross margin is consistently in the mid to upper 70 percent, and its main
customers are orthopedic surgeons, hospitals, and ultimately patients. Also, a total hip or total knee
replacement is an extremely technical operation. For this reason, Morgan has an array of sales associates
around the world that not only deliver the necessary implants and instruments to the hospital but also provide
critically important information about the product and surgical technique during a case. Therefore, the sales
associate-surgeon relationship is important for maintenance and growth of sales.
In applying the BSC approach to Morgan, it is important to walk through the four different
perspectives and discuss how they affect each other and also how each measure improves company. The first is
learning and growth. Learning and growth is important because it is Morgan employees that drive innovation
and creativity throughout the organization. Hiring, training, and retaining key employee talent is necessary for
improving the next stage: business processes.
By improving the way that Morgan operates internally, it has increase focus and can better serve the 3rd
perspective: customers. Customers that purchase products consistently and/or those that purchase premium
technology products lead to increased revenues and improvement in the 4th perspective: Financial performance.
The tracking of key financial metrics helps Morgan measure those areas that tie directly with corporate
strategies.
In exploring the first perspective, learning and growth, it is important to remember that key employee
talent is critical to the success of the organization. Some of the unique attributes of this perspective within
Morgan are a highly technical and creative workforce, employee interest in continued education, and high
attraction to the medical field. In order to be a highly motivated and capable organization, Morgan would
implement the following employee goals: 1) provide continued opportunities for employee learning and
training, 2) increase employee empowerment to make key decisions, 3) encourage innovation and creative
thinking and 4) have a highly satisfied and motivated workforce. Some of the metrics that would be measured
in order to judge performance would be the percentage of internal promotions, continued education tuition
reimbursement, retention rates, employee satisfaction surveys, and benchmarking evaluations.
In exploring the next perspective, internal business practices, it is important to remember that Morgan
produces high quality, high technology products. Also important is the fact that new propriety, premium-priced
implants are the main drivers of growth. Therefore some of the goals that Morgan would implement would be
to 1) minimize the potential for product recalls, 2) increase sales force focus on premium products, 3) become
the technology leader in new product development, and 4) minimize time from idea creation to launch. In order
to achieve these goals Morgan would measure 1) the percentage of “first run” products that are manufactured
without defect and incidence reports as measured by the FDA, 2) the percentage of new product sales from total
sales as determined by those systems launched in the past 18 months, 3) new, propriety technology product
launches and 4) product launch timelines.
In thinking about the next perspective, customers, it is important to remember that the Morgan’s main
customers are orthopedic surgeons. They are a highly educated and technical professional group. Second,
market share is extremely sticky, causing the relationship between sales associate and surgeon to be critical in
the selling process. Therefore the goals for the customer perspective are to 1) increase customer loyalty and
satisfaction, 2) better target the most profitable customers, and 3) increase new customer usage. Some of the
measures that Morgan would look at are 1) share of profitable customer’s business, 2) measurement of average
profit per account and 3) percentage of the business that is coming from new customers.
The final BSC perspective that Morgan would measure would be financial performance. Important
criteria to Morgan in this category are the need for profitable R&amp;D and product development cycles, ready

141

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

access to cash, and efficient return on investment throughout its various divisions. The measures that would be
considered for financial performance are IRR and NPV minimums, consistent growth in free cash flow, and
ROI and ROA assessments.
As we step back to assess the value of a BSC system for Morgan, it is important to remember that the
measures will only work if employees believe in their value. The biggest motivation for employee input and
support of a BSC system is to directly tie the performance evaluations to the BSC measures. It is also important
to make sure that these targets are aligned with the broader corporate strategy. By determining strategy first,
and then building your BSC measures on those tactics that directly support the plan for the organization, the
BSC approach is much more effective.
Another important part of implementing the BSC at Morgan is to incorporate lessons that other
organizations have learned when they developed their own BSC system. As more organizations implement
BSC, there are more opportunities to avoid the potential land mines and hit the ground running with an effective
measurement system. Some of these lessons are the need for flexibility, openness, efficiency, and
inclusiveness.
The need for flexibility stems from the fact that it takes time to develop the tools and measures that
will ultimately benefit Morgan the most. All of the correct measures will not be in place the first year, therefore
Morgan should be willing to change or drop those measures that are not working or are not aligned with the
broader corporate vision. The need for openness is also critically important because it keeps individuals at all
levels engaged and focused on the right measures. By having an open communication channel from the CEO to
the down, individual employees are empowered to make decisions that improve important measures. It is also
important to be efficient in the measures that the company decides are critical to its success. Efficient focus on
the key metrics for success is vitally important. Finally, including all departments in the planning and
development of the BSC approach helps to achieve employee buy-in and support the measurement system.
This is important not only at BSC creation, but also through continual feedback and refinement of the system
moving forward.

4. Conclusion
Many aspects were explored about the BSC and it can be claimed that there is much to be discovered
about it. First to be explored were the main concepts and ideas about the BSC. This helped to get a general
idea of what the BSC is all about. After understanding this, the reasons that industries need the BSC were
discussed. The industry focused on was the healthcare industry and the many reasons why this approach could
be used. More specifically we chose to go into more detail and chose a company in the healthcare industry that
actually uses the BSC in their operations. The findings of the study imply that the implementation cost of the
BSC is high. Therefore, it is important to make cost-benefit analysis rigorously. So it can be concluded on this
note that though the BSC would be the right choice for many, including firms in the healthcare industry, it may
not be the right choice for all. With the BSC being fairly young, it is the common perception that this approach
will continue to be explored and efficiency will be improved on it in the future. It is very well likely that more
and more companies, including the healthcare industry, will use the BSC in the future.

References
Albright, Tom &amp; Davis, Stan (2004). An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial
performance. Management Accounting Research, 135-153.
Coskun, Ali (2006). Stratejik performans yonetimi ve performans karnesi. Istanbul: Literatur.
Davis, Fred R. (2005). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hoque, Z. &amp; James, W. (2000). Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational
performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12, 1-17.
Inamdar, N. &amp; Kaplan, R. (2002). Applying the balanced scorecard in healthcare provider organizations. Journal of
Healthcare Management, 47(3), 179-95.
Niven, P.R. (2002). Balanced scorecard step-by-step : maximizing performance and maintaining results. New York: John
Wiley
&amp;
Sons,
Inc.
Kaplan, R. &amp; Norton, D.P. (2000). The strategy-focused organization : how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new
business environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R. &amp; Norton, D.P. (1996). The balanced scorecard : translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business
School Press.
Kaplan, R. &amp; Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review,
January-February, 71-79.

142

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Kocakulah, M.C. &amp; Austill, D.A. (2007). Balanced scorecard application in the healthcare industry: a case study. Journal of
Health Care Finance, 34(1), 72–99.
MacStravic, S. (1999). A really balanced scorecard. Health Forum Journal, 42(3), 64-67.
Voelker, K. E., Rakich, J. S., and French, G. R. (2001).The balanced scorecard in healthcare organizations: A performance
measurement and strategic planning methodology. Hospital Topics, 79(3), 13-24.

143

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26206">
                <text>147</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26207">
                <text>The Balanced Scorecard in the Healthcare Industry: A Case Study</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26208">
                <text>ŞENYİĞİT, Yigit Bora</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26209">
                <text>The performance measurement and management is an important process for  decision-makers in any type of organization. One of the performance measurement tools  available is the balanced scorecard, which provides a comprehensive set of financial and nonfinancial    performance measures for the organizations to be strategy focused. This study  discusses the balanced scorecard generally from theoretical views, and why it should be used   by healthcare  organizations. Moreover, the study is enhanced by performing a case study to  examine the implementation process of the balanced scorecard by healthcare (orthopedics)   company in the United States. This study suggests that though the balanced scorecard would  be the right choice for many, including companies in the healthcare industry, it may not be  the right choice for all.  With the balanced scorecard being fairly young, it is the common  perception that this approach will continue to be explored and efficiency will be improved on  it in the future. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26210">
                <text>2009-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26211">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>HB Economic Theory</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3432" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4224">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/99e291888fd3fea30a1fd52a2a0895ed.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cb1d00e3ec4a22619028199c2b9ea55f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="26205">
                    <text>1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

The Importance of Environmental Accounting for Sustainable
Development
Hasan ŞENOL
Lecturer, Isparta, Turkiye
hassenol@sdu.edu.tr
Ahmet AKTÜRK
Lecturer, Isparta, Turkiye
akturk@sdu.edu.tr

Abstract: It is not possible to say that, while meeting its endless demands and needs,
humankind has made use of the ecological environment economically which is one of the
sources of the community. The signs that have seen over the last ten years shows that, due to
this consumption desire, humankind will lead the world up to calamity faster than it is
estimated. This course of events has to be stopped urgently for the sake future generations. At
this point, the concept of sustainable development plan becomes important. For sustainable
development all sections of society has great roles. Enterprises are one of these sections. The
design of accounting information system concerning about environmental costs emerged
during the production period of the enterprises is a necessity of this exquisite approach.

Introduction
It is known that environmental problems have shown an increasing tendency by means of technological
developments and application of them. The fact of globalization being developed rapidly since 1990s not only
has led for environmental awareness to become widespread but also has been enabled for nations to act together
for matter of environmental protection. Accounting having universal general rules and double entry
bookkeeping used together by all nations and ensuring today universality of the accounting have constantly
been interested in environmental issues within its own logic. (Güvemli &amp; Gökdeniz, 1996, p.23)
Fundamentally uniform chart of accounts and financial statements are always discussed in finance and
own interest of the corporation, interest of partners, third party interest because of liabilities and state interest as
natural stakeholder have been put forward. Actual “natural stakeholder” environmental issues within these
interest groups have not taken the place as necessary yet. Despite all, the concept of “environmental
accounting” has been widespread gradually due to effect of being emergent much more in very developed
countries. (Güvemli &amp; Gökdeniz, 1996, p.23)
To ensure sustainable development, it is seen that environmental accounting is a promising approach in
terms of providing information to assist in ensuring the equilibrium between economy and environment. (Mutlu,
2007, p.169)

1. The Concept of Environmental Accounting
In consideration of rapid deterioration in environmental conditions and concern of closing to limits of
the world, it is required that business managers shall change their point of view to ecological environment as
soon as possible and shall evaluate the ecological environment as an crucial factor in the taking of decision
related to operating activities. (Nemli, 2009)
Nowadays environmental managers and business managers in the industry encounter ever increasing
demands of shareholders, consumers and law maker related to environmental performance. Moreover,
environmental performance of product and corporation during competition at the market is frequently stated.
(Anex &amp; Englehardt, 2001, p.99
It is possible to describe the concept of “environmental accounting” having increasing importance with
such commercial reasons. (Güvemli &amp; Gökdeniz, 1996, p.23-24)
“Environmental accounting: description of the environment by measuring its negative effects and
prediction of them in the accounting system applications.”
Corporation managers also have to pay attention to such demands into strategic decisions and develop
more sensitive management approach to environment in order to catch up aforesaid change. Environmental
management is an understanding adapting by enterprises that take into consideration ecological environment as

159

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

an important matter in the decision procedures, aim to minimize or abolish entirely the damage to the
environment because of its activities, and change design and packaging of its products as well as its
manufacturing process in this perspective, make a endeavor for replacing of the philosophy of protection of
ecological environment into culture of the enterprise and fulfill its duties for society within the scope of social
responsibility. (Nemli, 2009)
In the Table 1, it is listed about comparison between traditional management and environmental
management.
Table 1. Traditional Management-environmental Management Comparison
In objectives
In products
In organization

In environment

In functions of
business

Traditional Management
Economic growth and profit
Return for partners
Products designed for function, style and price
Packaging causing unnecessary waste
Hierarchical structure
Decision-making from top to bottom
Centralization in decision-making
Having a good command of environment
Managing of the environment as a source
Evaluation of pollution and wastes as
externalities
The marketing aims to increase the consumption.
Financing asks for maximizing the profit in the
short term.
The accounting concentrates on traditional costs
Management of human resources targets to
increase efficiency of labor

Environmental Management
Sustainability and standard of living
Welfare of partners
Environment friendly products designed for
environment
Non- hierarchical structure
Participatory decision-making
Decentralization in decision-making
Being harmony with nature
Becoming aware of natural resources not being
unlimited.
Managing and minimizing pollution and wastes.
The marketing is for consumer training.
Financing aims the long term sustainable growth
The accounting concentrates on environmental
costs.
Management of human resources ensure health
and security at work.

Source: Nemli, 2009, www.sbf.istanbul.edu.tr
Everyone is responsible for protecting and developing the environment being subject to different
evaluations from different perspective and becoming one of today crucial problems. Because the common
interest in the protection of environment is available, everyone is affected from environmental problems,
environmental assets belong to all society, the precautions to be taken concern the common interest and the
effective implementation of these precautions depends on participation of everyone, the accounting also has
duties in this matter. (Erençin, 2001, p.69)

2. Environmental Accounting in the Context of Sustainable Development
The concept of sustainable development was stated at first in the report of Our Common Future
prepared by Commission on Environment And Development of United Nations in the year of 1987 and has
become prevalent. In this report, the sustainable development is described as satisfaction of today needs without
making concessions from satisfaction of needs of future generations. (Haftacı &amp;Soylu, 2007, p.111)
In this report, it is stated that environmental problems has threatened the earth and all people of both
developed and developing countries, crisis over the world are interrelating and environmental problems could
not be differentiated from other problems and it is also declared that development in the current evaluation level
of the humanity would be ended after a while and this would be prevented by understanding of “sustainable
development” and development of countries would be ensured via common quest of people. (Haftacı &amp;Soylu,
2007, p.112)
From the perspective of these developments, enterprises have taken important steps in the subject of
environment since beginning of 1990s. However, progresses related to this matter in the field of accounting and
finance was reluctant and superficial at the beginning. It is known that unless a realistic movement and change
in the economic structure is supported by accounting and finance practices, it would not be successful. For this
reason, contributions and achievements of corporations in this subject have been late. (Akün, 1999, p.152)
However, by the understanding of “better lose the saddle than horse”, enterprises designing their
accounting system organizations without taking environmental costs into consideration should fulfill this
requirement as soon as possible.

2. Categories of Environmental Costs
As a result of interaction between management strategies and environment responsibility of enterprises
in recent years, environmental accounting information system is required in order to evaluate the environmental

160

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

impacts and obtain information being necessary in the various decisions of the enterprise. Considering
environmental convenience, business managers need the data of environmental costs while deciding some
matters like product diversity and pricing in the management strategies to be determined, choosing of
production input, evaluations of options of waste management and projects of pollution prevention.
Environmental costs are emerged in conjunction with many different activities and complex fields and within a
large time interval. (Akün, 1999, p.152-153)
It is possible for environmental costs to classify as direct costs, administrative costs, product design
costs, research-development costs, costs for supporting social projects out of enterprise and other costs. Certain
examples related to these costs are available in the Table 2. This table includes most of important environmental
cost categories. (Li, 2001, p.59)
Table 2. Environmental Cost Classification
Cost
classes
Direct Costs

Example

*costs of reduction of damages to environment and air because of production process.
Including Costs for air, water and soil pollution prevention,/ costs of prevention of noise,
vibration, smell and land subsidence.
*Costs of prevention of climate change, global environment protection activities resulted
from protection of energy and water sources as well as protection of ozone layer and costs
of protection of sources.
*Costs of reduction, recycling, incineration and recovery of industrial hazardous wastes and solid nonhazardous wastes
Administrative *Costs of environmental training of employees.
*costs of establishment and implementation of environmental management process for instance costs of
costs
external certification related to management system
*Costs of monitoring and measuring of environmental burdens and recovery works
*Additional costs for purchasing of products not damaging the environment
*additional costs for purchasing fuel and other raw materials, such as activities for making harmful fuels
and raw materials as environment friendly.
*Costs of labor for integration above five points.
Product design *costs of recycling/re-composition and collection of the product.
* Costs of recycling/re-composition and collection of the package and cases.
costs
*Additional costs for more environment friendly product design changes
* Additional costs for production of more environment friendly package and packets
* Association of above four points with other costs, and payments to trade cooperation.
*Labor costs for integration of above five points
Research and *costs of research and development for design of more environment friendly products.
developments *costs of research/development/, design/planning during process changes for development of
environmental performance
costs
* costs of research and development for making distribution and sale system of corporation as
environment friendly
* Labor costs for above mentioned activities
*costs of forestation, beautification, landscape and other development works inside and outside of
Costs for
enterprise assets.
supporting
social projects *supporting of local committee and environmental activities. Such as financial support, seminar and
informing.
out of
*Participating and supporting environmental groups
enterprise
*costs of preparation of reports to be represented to public
*costs for advertisements related to environment
* Labor costs for integration of above five points
*costs for soil improvement works and environmental compensations
Other costs
*costs for value and compensation related to settlement
*costs for environmental lawsuits
*Charity or new burden/taxes related to environment
*other environmental costs not mentioned above.

Source : Li, 2001, p.60

3. Application Terms and Process of Environmental Accounting
The most general condition for application of environmental accounting into an enterprise is to
harmonize enterprise and environment.
Minimum conditions that an enterprise must have for application of environmental accounting are
mentioned below; (Uğur, 2006, p.58)
• Ensuring of support of upper level management

161

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo
•
•
•
•
•

Placing of environmental culture
Acceptance of the fact that corporation activities damage the environment,
Making evaluation of environmental impact at all projects,
Providing environmental training to all personnel,
Ensuring of integration in the meaning of description about what is measured and why it is required to
be measured for.
• Technology for being able to measure and keep necessary information,
• Reporting system to explain the performance measurement information required to interest groups.,
• Supervising system to ensure reliability of reported information.,
• In the cases of impossibility of all cost-sharing, demand of acceptance of estimations.,
• Comprehensive description of concepts like environmental assets, debt, contingent liability etc ,
• Other (demand, information and opportunity)
After fulfillment of application conditions of environmental accounting, application process is realized.
Application process consists of nine stages. These are; (Uğur, 2006, p.60)
• Development of modeling of input-output analysis for usage of material and energy,
• Description and understanding of environmental costs,
• Monitoring and reporting of non-financial data belonging to primary material and energy flow at the
enterprise.,
• Monitoring and reporting of environmental costs,
• Adoption of decision making models and approaches being predicated on environmental costs and
sensitivity,
• Usage of advanced technologies for distribution of environmental costs to organization units, process
and product costs,
• Extending of scope of environmental accounting and analysis via lifelong valuation and value chain
analysis,
• Reaching to environmental perfection via external reporting and reporting the evaluation in the given
undertaking to interest groups,
• Undertaking for reaching the target of sustainable development.
Understanding of “sustainability” should be together “environmental perfection” mentioned in 8th
stage. Because environmental perfection are focusing on reduction of wastes and pollution in addition to
effective usage of sources, while sustainable development predict on fair distribution of environmental costs
and benefits among people and especially surveillance of rights of both today and future generations in addition
to this understanding.
As a consequence, because nine steps predicted for environmental accounting are not certain, they
would be increased or decreased according to situation of the enterprise. However, steps mentioned here are
highly necessary and helpful for almost every enterprise. On the other hand, enterprise mush accept following
understanding for taking said steps: it should also participate to operation decisions like natural environment,
strategic planning, product development, budgeting of capital, in other words this should not be allocated to
only single and separate department and should be taken into consideration in all department of enterprise.
(Uğur, 2006, p.75)

4. Conclusion
Tangible applications and politics are required for going beyond saying of dependency to sustainable
development principles and significance of natural environment as empty words.
These politics should be determined as soon as possible and legal proceedings shall be realized for
fulfillment of accepted politics. In this context, using of tangible application tools is for implementation of
sustainable development. Environmental accounting is a tangible tool in the application of sustainable
development. Remember that applications of environmental accounting should be carried out in the base of
volunteering by demonstrating the emergency of environmental problems as justification and in the scope of
situation and interest special to individuals-societies-nations instead of methods based on discipline.
Environmental accounting to be called as “green accounting” is also requirement of social
responsibility of the enterprises. Considering in long term, it is anticipated that enterprises having the sense of
social responsibility would be accepted by society being more conscious rather than the past and this would
increase its market value.

References
Akün, L. (1999) Çevre Muhasebesi: Genel Bir Bakış, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt:1 Sayı:1, 145-155

162

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Anex, R.P.  Englehardt, J.D. (2001) Application of a Predictive Bayesian Model to Environmental Accounting, Journal of
Hazardous Materials A82, 99-112
Erençin, A. (2001) Çevresel Yönetim Sürecine Katılım, Abant Đzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,
Cilt:1, Sayı:2, 69-77
Güvemli, O.  Gökdeniz, Ü. (1996) Çevre Muhasebesindeki Gelişmeler, Muhasebe Öğretim Üyeleri Bilim ve Dayanışma
Vakfı Bülteni, Sayı:4, 23-27
Haftacı, V.  Soylu, K. (2007) Çevre Kirlenmesi ve Çevre Koruma Bağlamında Çevre Muhasebesinin Önemi, Muhasebe ve
Finansman Dergisi, Sayı:33, 102-120
Li, L. (2001) Encouraging Environmental Accounting Worldwide: A Survey of Government Policies and Instrument,
Corporate Environmental Strategy, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 47-57
Mutlu, A. (2007) Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Çevre Muhasebesi II, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Sayı:34, 162-173
Nemli, E. (2009) Çevreye Duyarlı Yönetim Anlayışı, http://www.sbf.istanbul.edu.tr/dergi/sayi23-24/17.htm
Uğur, K. (2006) Đşletme-Doğal Çevre Đlişkilerinin Mali Tablolar Aracılığıyla Raporlanması ve Denetimi, Sermaye Piyasası
Kurulu Yayın No:201, Ankara

163

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26199">
                <text>162</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26200">
                <text>The Importance of Environmental Accounting for Sustainable  Development</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26201">
                <text>ŞENOL, Hasan
AKTÜRK, Ahmet</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26202">
                <text>It is not possible to say that, while meeting its endless demands and needs,  humankind has made use of the ecological environment economically which is one of the  sources of the community. The signs that have seen over the last ten years shows that, due to  this consumption desire, humankind will lead the world up to calamity faster than it is  estimated. This course of events has to be stopped urgently for the sake future generations. At  this point, the concept of sustainable development plan becomes important. For sustainable  development all sections of society has great roles. Enterprises are one of these sections. The  design of accounting information system concerning about environmental costs emerged  during the production period of the enterprises is a necessity of this exquisite approach</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26203">
                <text>2009-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="26204">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>HB Economic Theory</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
