<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=168&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-06-18T14:11:53+01:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>168</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>3494</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="1778" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2530">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/a8deb9997b68cd2c31fcabd6a889ecc7.docx</src>
        <authentication>f0e7f2ea676adf0720d295fa909efaf7</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2531">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/bb70387e261bde37c13c9abc033666ce.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b51e115d41b65e20f77b068c37937685</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="14625">
                    <text>In Top Notch: English for Today’s World I, the Effectiveness of Verbal -Linguistic
Intelligence on Teaching English through Multiple Intelligences Theory
Zeynep Arslan &amp; Melih Karakuzu
International Burch University/ Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Key words:Multiple Intelligences Theory, Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence, Top Notch: English for Today’s World I.
ABSTRACT
This study represents the effectiveness of Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence through related activities in Multiple
Intelligences Theory introduced by Howard Gardner. In Top Notch: English for Today’s World I, Verbal-Linguistic
Intelligence is the most mainly analyzed of all the intelligences, so through activities, the impacts of VerbalLinguistic Intelligence on Multiple Intelligences Theory will be taken into consideration in Teaching English for
Top Notch: English for Today’s World I. It will be pointed out whether Top Notch: English for Today’s World I has
any impact and effectiveness through Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence on Teaching English in Multiple Intelligences
Theory.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14618">
                <text>2063</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14619">
                <text>In Top Notch: English for Today’s World I, the Effectiveness of Verbal -Linguistic Intelligence on Teaching English through Multiple Intelligences Theory</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14620">
                <text>ARSLAN, Zeynep 
KARAKUZU, Melih </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14621">
                <text>Key words:Multiple Intelligences Theory, Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence, Top Notch: English for Today’s World I.  ABSTRACT  This study represents the effectiveness of Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence through related activities in Multiple Intelligences Theory introduced by Howard Gardner. In Top Notch: English for Today’s World I, Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence is the most mainly analyzed of all the intelligences, so through activities, the impacts of Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence on Multiple Intelligences Theory will be taken into consideration in Teaching English for Top Notch: English for Today’s World I. It will be pointed out whether Top Notch: English for Today’s World I has any impact and effectiveness through Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence on Teaching English in Multiple Intelligences Theory.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14622">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14623">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14624">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1779" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2532">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/33b1485258a87fb1f75ef3ea3a24c35a.docx</src>
        <authentication>75e75a8baee1a90950122dad30fcb142</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2533">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/ea22d8ee906ff8a1fa308ca8a0dd7d1c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>70ed07bb067979beb3cdb03311dc85cf</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="14633">
                    <text>The Impact of Spatial-Visual Intelligence on Learning Abstract Vocabularies in Junior
High School Students of Iran
Vahid Asghari &amp; Masoud Asghari
Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch /Arak, Iran
Key words: Spatial-Visual Intelligence, abstract vocabularies, concrete vocabularies, MI, visual aids
ABSTRACT
Students are individuals with unique strengths, weaknesses, aptitudes, interests, and capabilities. Howard Gardner
(1983) is the first person who talked about Multiple Intelligence (MI) and learning styles. His theory suggests that an
array of different kinds of “intelligence" exists in human beings. Each individual manifests varying levels of these
different intelligences. On the other hand, language is first and foremost an abstraction. Many learning aids and
traditional method lessons are ineffective because they emphasis concrete things during the first year of learning.
These are all great words, but the most important words in a language are abstract, such as verbs. In the current
study, the students were divided into visual experimental and control groups. During ten sessions of the treatment,
90 vocabularies were instructed to the two groups, while the visual experimental group received the words visually
and control group traditionally. After comparing the results of post test 1and post test 2 of students in experimental
and control group, it was concluded that there is a significant correlation between scores of Visual Intelligent
students and their scores in post test1 and posttest 2. While there was not any significant correlation between the
scores of control group in post test 1 and post test 2.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14626">
                <text>1988</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14627">
                <text>The Impact of Spatial-Visual Intelligence on Learning Abstract Vocabularies in Junior High School Students of Iran</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14628">
                <text>ASGHARI, Vahid 
ASGHARI, Masoud </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14629">
                <text>Key words: Spatial-Visual Intelligence, abstract vocabularies, concrete vocabularies, MI, visual aids  ABSTRACT  Students are individuals with unique strengths, weaknesses, aptitudes, interests, and capabilities. Howard Gardner (1983) is the first person who talked about Multiple Intelligence (MI) and learning styles. His theory suggests that an array of different kinds of “intelligence" exists in human beings. Each individual manifests varying levels of these different intelligences. On the other hand, language is first and foremost an abstraction. Many learning aids and traditional method lessons are ineffective because they emphasis concrete things during the first year of learning. These are all great words, but the most important words in a language are abstract, such as verbs. In the current study, the students were divided into visual experimental and control groups. During ten sessions of the treatment, 90 vocabularies were instructed to the two groups, while the visual experimental group received the words visually and control group traditionally. After comparing the results of post test 1and post test 2 of students in experimental and control group, it was concluded that there is a significant correlation between scores of Visual Intelligent students and their scores in post test1 and posttest 2. While there was not any significant correlation between the scores of control group in post test 1 and post test 2.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14630">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14631">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14632">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1780" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2534">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/8864a497ec8be95e7c59998e4e059bc2.docx</src>
        <authentication>8157b48a4ec68a3e90882c3de10a40df</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2535">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/396139ffc9c45cd8e0acead5a3afbe34.pdf</src>
        <authentication>897565972e79098bd8915261494c6d06</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="14641">
                    <text>How Much Does the English Textbooks of Iran Conform to Universal Characteristics of
English Textbooks? a Case Study on English Textbooks of Junior High Schools in Iran
Vahid Asghari &amp; Fatemeh Azizmohammadi
Islamic Azad University /Arak, Iran
Key words: CLT, evaluation, syllabus design, curriculum, universal characteristics of EFL
ABSTRACT
Any educational system is composed of five important components (students, a teacher, materials, teaching
methods, and evaluation) which are closely interrelated. Even in the context of communicative language teaching
(CLT), teachers and learners tend to rely heavily on prescribed textbooks which are still a staple in most of EFL
classes. Sheldon (1988) has offered several reasons for textbook evaluation. He suggests that the selection of an ELT
textbook often signals an important administrative and educational decision in which there is considerable
professional, financial, or even political investment. A thorough evaluation, therefore, would enable the managerial
and teaching staff of a specific institution or organization to discriminate between all of the available textbooks on
the market. In this study, the English textbook of third grade of Iran's junior high schools will be evaluated based on
the current research findings in syllabus design, English language teaching, and the specific language teaching
situation and curriculum in Iran. Moreover, this study will be an attempt to determine the extent to which the EFL
textbook (English 3) conformed to the common universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14634">
                <text>1969</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14635">
                <text>How Much Does the English Textbooks of Iran Conform to Universal Characteristics of English Textbooks? a Case Study on English Textbooks of Junior High Schools in Iran</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14636">
                <text>ASGHARI, Vahid 
AZIZMOHAMMADI, Fatemeh </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14637">
                <text>Key words: CLT, evaluation, syllabus design, curriculum, universal characteristics of EFL  ABSTRACT  Any educational system is composed of five important components (students, a teacher, materials, teaching methods, and evaluation) which are closely interrelated. Even in the context of communicative language teaching (CLT), teachers and learners tend to rely heavily on prescribed textbooks which are still a staple in most of EFL classes. Sheldon (1988) has offered several reasons for textbook evaluation. He suggests that the selection of an ELT textbook often signals an important administrative and educational decision in which there is considerable professional, financial, or even political investment. A thorough evaluation, therefore, would enable the managerial and teaching staff of a specific institution or organization to discriminate between all of the available textbooks on the market. In this study, the English textbook of third grade of Iran's junior high schools will be evaluated based on the current research findings in syllabus design, English language teaching, and the specific language teaching situation and curriculum in Iran. Moreover, this study will be an attempt to determine the extent to which the EFL textbook (English 3) conformed to the common universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14638">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14639">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14640">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1781" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2536">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/d971ae76a8c98dbff22979f1a6aa44f4.docx</src>
        <authentication>1150376407df59f18f512ec855c9522e</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2537">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/988fb73595cbaeef004ee683c0b055a2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1c6a3bbda1ca3f3ff29bd5c58e36fe69</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="14649">
                    <text>Code-Switching in the Contemporary Dialects; a Case Study on Raji Dialect Regarding to
Different Generations
Vahid Asghari &amp; Hamid Reza Najafi
Islamic Azad University /Arak, Iran
Key words: code switching, language loss, dialect, language shift, morphosyntactic
ABSTRACT
In the language shift situation, a dominant language is acquired perfectly. While the minority language is used less
and less and is gradually forgotten. Its vocabulary decreases, and the speakers have to insert into their speech words
and phrases from the dominant language. This is the situation with the Raji dialect. Only the oldest speakers
preserve the language to full extent. Very few people under 40 know their parents' language or they can understand
it, but do not speak it. During the interviews conducted in Persian, all informants can speak Persian without
switching to Raji. But when speaking Raji, even the oldest speakers don’t use numerous Persian words, but the
middle generation switch to Persian rather often, inserting Persian phrases and words that show no phonological or
morphosyntactic integration into the Raji dialect. In the speech of the oldest speakers, no code switching pattern was
found when they were speaking by Raji dialect while the code-switching pattern was more typical for
representatives of the middle generation. They switch to Persian mainly to compensate the insufficiency of their Raji
vocabulary. In their casual speech they often insert Persian words that are not integrated into the Raji dialect
structure. On the other hand, the attempts of the middle generation to use "as much Raji as possible" during the
interview with a researcher confirm that they are conscious of the insufficiency of their language competence.
During the interviews they prefer to adapt Persian words to the Raji dialect phonologically and morphologically,
sometimes they even try to use Raji numerals that are not used by older people. Such unpredictability of codeswitching, together with weakening of sociolinguistic motivation and insertion of Persian words and phrases as a
result of the vocabulary reducing, seems to be one of the symptoms of the gradual language loss.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14642">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14643">
                <text>Code-Switching in the Contemporary Dialects; a Case Study on Raji Dialect Regarding to Different Generations</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14644">
                <text>ASGHARI, Vahid 
NAJAFI, Hamid Reza </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14645">
                <text>Key words: code switching, language loss, dialect, language shift, morphosyntactic  ABSTRACT  In the language shift situation, a dominant language is acquired perfectly. While the minority language is used less and less and is gradually forgotten. Its vocabulary decreases, and the speakers have to insert into their speech words and phrases from the dominant language. This is the situation with the Raji dialect. Only the oldest speakers preserve the language to full extent. Very few people under 40 know their parents' language or they can understand it, but do not speak it. During the interviews conducted in Persian, all informants can speak Persian without switching to Raji. But when speaking Raji, even the oldest speakers don’t use numerous Persian words, but the middle generation switch to Persian rather often, inserting Persian phrases and words that show no phonological or morphosyntactic integration into the Raji dialect. In the speech of the oldest speakers, no code switching pattern was found when they were speaking by Raji dialect while the code-switching pattern was more typical for representatives of the middle generation. They switch to Persian mainly to compensate the insufficiency of their Raji vocabulary. In their casual speech they often insert Persian words that are not integrated into the Raji dialect structure. On the other hand, the attempts of the middle generation to use "as much Raji as possible" during the interview with a researcher confirm that they are conscious of the insufficiency of their language competence. During the interviews they prefer to adapt Persian words to the Raji dialect phonologically and morphologically, sometimes they even try to use Raji numerals that are not used by older people. Such unpredictability of code-switching, together with weakening of sociolinguistic motivation and insertion of Persian words and phrases as a result of the vocabulary reducing, seems to be one of the symptoms of the gradual language loss.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14646">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14647">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14648">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1782" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2538">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/8296b3f6c96b0373e004d3e2b11eb695.docx</src>
        <authentication>f32a69abe65721f539032e81f0497b33</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2539">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/9d11d03b2a9229c4ac3bf47fee60b834.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c626489812134d8a5c6335e85357d355</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="14657">
                    <text>A Comparative Analysis of Cohesive Conjunctions Use in the Weather Forecast of Native
and Non-Native Reporter
Hanieh Davatgari Asl &amp; Javad Mehri Shendi
Islamic Azad University/Shabestar, Iran
ABSTRACT
This study analyzes 2 types of texts which has been taken in one accidental day one from weather forecast news of
BBC channel(reporting by native speaker of English), and another from NHK TV(reporting by non-native speaker
of English).The Cohesive devices (reference, conjunctions, substitutions /ellipsis, lexical cohesions) were identified
in both texts and then conjunctions were chose from 2 texts to compare with each other from 2 points of view:1)type
of cohesive conjunctions which are used in two texts and 2)frequency of them. Findings of the study indicated
differential uses of cohesive conjunctions in 2 texts and more uses of some cohesive conjunctions in non-native
English speaking reporter.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14650">
                <text>1809</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14651">
                <text>A Comparative Analysis of Cohesive Conjunctions Use in the Weather Forecast of Native and Non-Native Reporter</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14652">
                <text>ASL, Hanieh Davatgari
SHENDI, Javad Mehri </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14653">
                <text>This study analyzes 2 types of texts which has been taken in one accidental day one from weather forecast news of BBC channel(reporting by native speaker of English), and another from NHK TV(reporting by non-native speaker of English).The Cohesive devices (reference, conjunctions, substitutions /ellipsis, lexical cohesions) were identified in both texts and then conjunctions were chose from 2 texts to compare with each other from 2 points of view:1)type of cohesive conjunctions which are used in two texts and 2)frequency of them. Findings of the study indicated differential uses of cohesive conjunctions in 2 texts and more uses of some cohesive conjunctions in non-native English speaking reporter.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14654">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14655">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14656">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1783" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2540">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/c11789663a8ff44e983d9fa9431713ae.docx</src>
        <authentication>8ef274c899cf7260d9c1b3b85a0036fe</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2541">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/c65ba6eeda8dc273963a9f7495cc31e6.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3b403cf3f83e60b1c78daf1ef300551c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="14665">
                    <text>The Review of Interaction Enhancement and Efl Learners' Language Learning
Hanieh Davatgari Asl &amp; Kamran Doulati
Islamic Azad University/ Iran
Key words: Interaction Hypothesis, Input Hypothesis, Output Hypothesis, Input, Output, Modify
ABSTRACT
Current article investigates through Interaction Hypothesis and its advantages in learning language. This study
distinguishes similar hypothesis such as, Input and Output Hypothesis to make a better understanding of Interaction
Hypothesis. Interaction gets merits of integrated Input and Output hypothesis to prepare interactive atmosphere for
learners to modify the inputs and show their learning by making their own outputs.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14658">
                <text>1832</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14659">
                <text>The Review of Interaction Enhancement and Efl Learners' Language Learning</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14660">
                <text>ASL, Hanieh Davatgari 
DOULATI, Kamran</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14661">
                <text>Key words: Interaction Hypothesis, Input Hypothesis, Output Hypothesis, Input, Output, Modify  ABSTRACT  Current article investigates through Interaction Hypothesis and its advantages in learning language. This study distinguishes similar hypothesis such as, Input and Output Hypothesis to make a better understanding of Interaction Hypothesis. Interaction gets merits of integrated Input and Output hypothesis to prepare interactive atmosphere for learners to modify the inputs and show their learning by making their own outputs.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14662">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14663">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14664">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1784" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2542">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/d3fe5fb6af94303c6d636df0b30539aa.docx</src>
        <authentication>bf014ee47ffc471ab3b75eae3caa9099</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2543">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/ce6d7e6dcfc3517fb07d63f05672781e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8d4ed742596c5c85cc8b8c345ca5ddc2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="14673">
                    <text>The Review of Interaction Enhancement and EFL Learners' Language Learning.
Hanieh Davatgari Asl&amp; Kamran Doulati
Islamic Azad university, Iran
Key words: Interaction Hypothesis, Input Hypothesis, Output Hypothesis, Input, Output, Modify.
ABSTRACT
Current article investigates through Interaction Hypothesis and its advantages in learning language. This study
distinguishes similar hypothesis such as, Input and Output Hypothesis to make a better understanding of Interaction
Hypothesis. Interaction gets merits of integrated Input and Output hypothesis to prepare interactive atmosphere for
learners to modify the inputs and show their learning by making their own outputs.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14666">
                <text>1803</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14667">
                <text>The Review of Interaction Enhancement and EFL Learners' Language Learning.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14668">
                <text>ASL, Hanieh Davatgari 
DOULATI, Kamran </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14669">
                <text>Key words: Interaction Hypothesis, Input Hypothesis, Output Hypothesis, Input, Output, Modify.  ABSTRACT  Current article investigates through Interaction Hypothesis and its advantages in learning language. This study distinguishes similar hypothesis such as, Input and Output Hypothesis to make a better understanding of Interaction Hypothesis. Interaction gets merits of integrated Input and Output hypothesis to prepare interactive atmosphere for learners to modify the inputs and show their learning by making their own outputs.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14670">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14671">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14672">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1785" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2544">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/8414d75c6ec9d98bafe81c49e9046258.docx</src>
        <authentication>815d71734df37127980c4ae535e12db9</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2545">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/f26422c724f7921846fb44ef930d3f09.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9f200c012a2a71efa7cc28cd47104a07</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="14681">
                    <text>Issues in Syllabus Design: Needs Analysis
Hanieh Davatgari Asl&amp;Saed Molaie
Islamic Azad University, Iran
ABSTRACT
This paper is trying to define the needs and then categorize the needs according to different dimensions and see the
factors influencing needs analysis (NA).NA should consider both present and future needs of the learners in one
dimension and needs of the instruction program and authorities in another dimension. The Needs can be acquired
from the learners to see what their necessities are in the real world. Target needs are different from the learner's
needs also authorities and teachers expectation of the course affect the selection of the target needs and their grading
in that course.NA in necessary in Both General purpose English and ESP (English for specific purpose) but in ESP
the learners are more aware of their own needs. Sometimes they can participate in curriculum development in
planning, implementing, evaluation, management and administration in order to make them involved and motivate
them for language learning.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14674">
                <text>1786</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14675">
                <text>Issues in Syllabus Design: Needs Analysis</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14676">
                <text>ASL, Hanieh Davatgari 
MOLAIE, Saed </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14677">
                <text>This paper is trying to define the needs and then categorize the needs according to different dimensions and see the factors influencing needs analysis (NA).NA should consider both present and future needs of the learners in one dimension and needs of the instruction program and authorities in another dimension. The Needs can be acquired from the learners to see what their necessities are in the real world. Target needs are different from the learner's needs also authorities and teachers expectation of the course affect the selection of the target needs and their grading in that course.NA in necessary in Both General purpose English and ESP (English for specific purpose) but in ESP the learners are more aware of their own needs. Sometimes they can participate in curriculum development in planning, implementing, evaluation, management and administration in order to make them involved and motivate them for language learning.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14678">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14679">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14680">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1786" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2546">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/ec8f081c3f7546b1488ab5406438326a.docx</src>
        <authentication>95dd54ae5c59fcd18fbac6b96f59a422</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2547">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/907f409d74790fce3ff2e21c5293a641.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c9b55e8f514b644efdfb9bcd470ce124</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="14689">
                    <text>The Effect of Daynamic Assessment on Iranian Efl Learner's Use of Discourse Markers in
Their Writing
Nader Asadi Aydinlu &amp; Haniye Davatgar Asl
Ahar Azad University/Iran
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the impact of Daynamic Assessment on Iranian EFL Learner’s use of discourse markers in
their writing. The participants of the study were 60 undergraduate students , who were learning English at the
Zabansara institute of Marand. For eliciting the necessary data, participants were given a pretest of writing ability to
check their initial knowledge about using of discourse markers in their writing. We divided participants to two
groups, control and experimental . The experimental group were then exposed to explicit instruction of discourse
markers by Daynamic Assessment approach , for six successive sessions. The control group received no
instruction. Finally, a post test was administered to them for measuring their writing ability with discourse markers
in focus. The findings indicated generally that explicit instruction of discourse markers by Daynamic Assessment
approach significantly improves EFL Learner’s use of discourse markers in their writing. These findings call
practitioners to pay more attention to discourse markers in their writing , which their using of discourse markers and
their writing ability developed by explicit instruction of discourse markers through DA approach.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14682">
                <text>1930</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14683">
                <text>The Effect of Daynamic Assessment on Iranian Efl Learner's Use of Discourse Markers in Their Writing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14684">
                <text>AYDINLU, Nader Asadi Aydinlu
ASL, Haniye Davatgar </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14685">
                <text>This study investigates the impact of Daynamic Assessment on Iranian EFL Learner’s use of discourse markers in their writing. The participants of the study were 60 undergraduate students , who were learning English at the Zabansara institute of Marand. For eliciting the necessary data, participants were given a pretest of writing ability to check their initial knowledge about using of discourse markers in their writing. We divided participants to two groups, control and experimental . The experimental group were then exposed to explicit instruction of discourse markers by Daynamic Assessment approach , for six successive sessions. The control group received no instruction. Finally, a post test was administered to them for measuring their writing ability with discourse markers in focus. The findings indicated generally that explicit instruction of discourse markers by Daynamic Assessment approach significantly improves EFL Learner’s use of discourse markers in their writing. These findings call practitioners to pay more attention to discourse markers in their writing , which their using of discourse markers and their writing ability developed by explicit instruction of discourse markers through DA approach.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14686">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14687">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14688">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1787" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2548">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/afbe16ce958b3d7403370c966426899c.docx</src>
        <authentication>3da50417e9cbe268c9265187749d7b40</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2549">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/da27de31677e99414032b51a347f3717.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ebd5d8095123a4bfdc0e215226d141ca</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="14697">
                    <text>Key of Language Assesment: Rubrics and Rubric Design
Ülkü Ayhan &amp; M. Ugur Turkyilmaz
International Burch University/ Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Key words: rubric, rubric design, language assesment, rubric types, performance assessment
ABSTRACT
Rubrics are the guidelines of language instructors in the continuum of language teaching process. They play a role
in the clarification of grading process. While walking on the way of grading, a language instructor can`t ignore the
milestones of that process, which are objectivity, consistency and efficiency.
This paper aims to provide an understanding towards rubrics and its concerns such as definitions and types of rubric,
where and how to use it, what the most appropriate use is, understanding of rubric design from different perspectives
and its in-class use etc. The literature review on rubric design is examined and aimed to propose a guide to
understand it in this paper.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14690">
                <text>1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14691">
                <text>Key of Language Assesment: Rubrics and Rubric Design</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14692">
                <text>AYHAN, Ülkü 
TURKYILMAZ, M. Ugur </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14693">
                <text>Key words: rubric, rubric design, language assesment, rubric types, performance assessment  ABSTRACT  Rubrics are the guidelines of language instructors in the continuum of language teaching process. They play a role in the clarification of grading process. While walking on the way of grading, a language instructor can`t ignore the milestones of that process, which are objectivity, consistency and efficiency.  This paper aims to provide an understanding towards rubrics and its concerns such as definitions and types of rubric, where and how to use it, what the most appropriate use is, understanding of rubric design from different perspectives and its in-class use etc. The literature review on rubric design is examined and aimed to propose a guide to understand it in this paper</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14694">
                <text>IBU Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14695">
                <text>2013-05-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14696">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
