<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=127&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-06-16T10:02:48+01:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>127</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>3494</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="2192" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3246">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/90cc2e6c5d61303196cae1ac7b01a119.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e31c54ff96e238d928ec453c520529bf</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="17789">
                    <text>Bardakçı, S. (2007) ―The Determination of Optical Properties of TiO2 Thin Film Prepared
with Sol-Jel Method ‖, MSc Thesis, Sakarya University, SAKARYA.
Soo, W.L. Carlos, M. Joaquin L.O. Seung, H.K. Tohru, S. Koichi N. and Bernard, J.H.
(2003) ―Tribological and Microstructural Analysis of Al2O3/TiO2 Nano composites to
Use in the Femoral Head of Hip Replacement‖, Wear, 255, 1040-1044.
Sathiyakumar, M. and Gnanam, F.D. (2002) ―Influence of MnO and TiO2 Additives on
Density, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al2O3‖, Ceramics international,
28, 195-200.
Barsoum, M.W. (1997) ―Fundamentals of Ceramics‖, Mc Graw Hill, New York, USA.
Kalpakjian, S. (1997) ―Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials‖, Prentice Hall 4. Edition, USA.
Yıldırım, İ. (2002) ―The effect of Production Condition and Composition on The Strength
Properties of Al2O3 and SiC‖, PhD Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, ISTANBUL
Aneziris, C.G. Scharfl, W. and Ullridch, B.(2007) ―Microstructure Evaluation of Al2O3
Ceramics with Mg-PSZ and TiO2 Additions‖, Journal of the European Ceramic
Society, 27, 3191-3199.

Glass Foams Containing Fly Ash And Sheet Glass By Adding Calcite As Foaming Agent
Ediz Ercenk1, Gunhan Bayrak2, Senol Yilmaz1, Volkan Gunay3
1Sakarya University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Metallurgical and Materials
Engineering, Esentepe Campus, 54187 Sakarya, Turkey,
2Sakarya University, Arifiye Vocational School, 54580 Arifiye, Sakarya
3TUBITAK-MAM, Material Institute, 41470 Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
Abstract
Glass foam is a porous isolation material used for heat isolation. In this study, the possibilities
of glass foam production using calcite as a foaming agent was investigated. The mixture was
prepared 10% wt. of waste window glass and 90% wt. Seyitömer thermal power plant fly ash.
2.5 to 10% wt. calcite was added to mixture and pressed under 75 MPa pressure by uniaxial
cold pressing to obtain cylindrical specimens. Pressed samples sintered at 750-950 °C
temperature range for 1 hour according to differential thermal analysis (DTA) results. The
effect of calcite addition and sintering temperature on the porosity, density, compressive
strength, microstructure and crystalline phases were investigated. It was determined that the
284

�properties of glass foams was changing depend on calcite addition as foaming agent and the
sintering temperature. The results showed that calcite provide foaming in specific proportions
for glass foam production.
Keywords: Calcite, fly ash, glass powder, glass foam
1. INTRODUCTION
Calcite is an abundant rock-forming mineral in the Earth's upper crust. It is a carbonate
mineral and the most stable polymorph of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). It has a defining mohs
hardness of 3, a specific gravity of 2.71, and its luster is vitreous in crystallized varieties.
Color is white or none, though shades of gray, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, brown,
or even black can occur when the mineral is charged with impurities. The dissolution and
precipitation behavior of calcite has been widely studied since it plays an important role in
rock weathering and soil chemistry and therefore these processes impose controls on the
natural sequestration of CO2. The carbon dioxide gas (CO2) is given off as bubbles and the
calcium dissolves in the calcinations reactions. Because of this features, some minerals
including carbonate can be used for foaming process (Vavouraki 2008, Wikipedia 2012).
Foam glass is a porous heat-insulating and soundproof material, with true porosity up to 90
vol.%. Foam glass is a heterophase system consisting of the gaseous and the solid phases. The
solid phase is glass that forms thin walls of single cells several micrometers thick. The cells
are ﬁlled with the gaseous phase. These materials have many properties such as high surface
area, high permeability, low density, low speciﬁc heat for high thermal and acoustic insulation
and high chemical resistance. Glass foams are resistant to water and water vapor and do not
burn. Commercial glass foams exhibit porosity, apparent density and compressive strength
values of about 85–95 vol.%, 0.1–0.3 g/cm3 and 0.4–6 MPa, respectively (Fernandes 2009).
Several synthesis routes are available to produce foam materials such as bubbles generation in
slurries or in a green body during a speciﬁc thermal treatment, reaction sintering, sol–gel
methods, direct foaming, pyrolysis of organic additives and polymeric sponge method (de
Sousa 2008). There are a lot of investigations for production of glass foam materials. To
investigate the effect of different additives and different raw materials on foaming process is
popular issue, recently.
In the current study, the production possibilities of glass foam materials including sheet glass,
fly ash and calcite were investigated. It is possible that this study can provide new view point
for producibility of more economical glass foam material.

285

�2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
In the present study, cullet of commercially produced soda lime sheet (SLS) glass and power
plant fly ash (Seyitömer-Turkey) were used as raw materials and their chemical analysis was
performed by x-ray fluorescence (PHILIPS PW2404). The chemical compositions of fly ash
and sheet glass were given in Table 1. and Table 2., respectively. Firstly, cullet glass was
crushed and then dry milled using a ring mill (RETSCH). The main mixture was prepared fly
ash 10 wt. % and sheet glass 90 wt. %. Calcite was added to mixture in the proportions of 2.510 % against sheet glass proportion in main mixture decreased by calcite addition for using
more waste fly ash. Four different compositions were prepared from glass and fly ash
with calcite addition by using ball mill for 1 h. The code schedule for samples was given in
Table 3.
Table 1. Chemical composition of fly ash
Oxi
de

SiO2

Al2
O3

Fe2
O3

Mg
O

Ca
O

SO
3

K2
O

TiO
2

NiO Na2
O

Wt.
%

56.8
96

17.2
46

10.6
28

5.13 4.31 2.39 1.55 0.67 0.23 0.31
7
6
8
4
7
6
1

P2O Cl
5

L.O
.I

0.12 0.02 0.44
8
8
5

Table 2. Chemical composition of sheet glass

Oxid
e

SiO2

Na2
O

CaO

%

73.19
5

9.916 8.59
0

MgO Al2O
3

Cl

K2O

TiO2 Fe2O
3

SO3

L.O.
I

5.99
8

0.02
5

0.10
8

0.04
0

0.33
8

0.09

1.515

0.185

Table 3. Sample code schedule

286

Sample code

Cullet (wt.%)

Fly ash(wt.%)

Calcite (wt.%)

25C

87.5

10

2.5

50C

85

10

5

75C

82.5

10

7.5

100C

80

10

10

�In establishing an optimal heat treatment procedure for foam reduction the thermal behavior
of glass cullet, fly ash and carbonates lays a key role. Differential thermal analysis (DTA)
(SEIKO Exstar 6000) was used to determine glass transition and crystallization temperature
for raw materials.
The cylindrically shaped samples with diameter of 25 mm and thickness of 15 mm obtained
by uniaxial pressing (800 kg/cm2) were sintered between 750 °C and 950 °C for 1 h
according to DTA results of sheet glass, fly ash and calcite. To characterize the prepared
samples apparent density, porosity, compressive strength and visual observation were
performed. Leica stereo microscopy was used for visual studies. X-ray diffraction analysis
(XRD) was used for phase analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL 6060)
was carried out for microstructural investigations. X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) using
analyze phases present in the coatings over a 2Ө range of 10o–90o were used for
characterization of the glass foam samples.
3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
DTA results of raw materials used glass foam production are shown in Figure 1. Glass
transition temperature was determined 550 °C for sheet glass (Figure 1a). Calcite exhibits a
strong endothermic peaks corresponding to moments of weight loss (Figure 1b) characteristic
of this material. The endothermic peak (790 °C) was due to the decomposition of calcium
carbonate (calcite) with release of CO2, according to the Eq. (1). The total weight loss was
about 45%.
CaCO3

CaO+

CO2

(1)
An exothermic peak in DTA analysis of fly ash was detected at 460 °C (Fig. 1c).
Accordingly, the weight loss of 3.1% occurs at the same temperature. This exothermic peak
occurs due to the unburned carbon reaction in fly ash. In this study sintering and foaming
temperatures were selected according to DTA results shown in Figure 1.

287

�(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1. Thermal analysis (heating rate 5 °C/min) of (a) sheet glass, (b) calcite and (c) fly ash
Tridymide (ASTM chard no: 42-1401), Cristobalite (ASTM chard no: 82-0512), Diopside
(ASTM chard no: 75-1092) and Augite (ASTM chard no: 78-1391) phases were determined
by XRD analysis. Augite was determine in sample including calsite 10 % but not determined
for the sample including calcite 2.5 %. The first significant point in XRD results is that peak
intensities and numbers increase with increasing sintering temperature due to better
crystallization. The intensities of Diopside and Augite peaks increase with increasing calcite
addition and sintering temperature, clearly. The zone under the XRD patterns illustrates glass
structure in body. The changing volumes of this zone infer to crystallization. When the
sintering temperature was 950 °C, this zone got narrow, markedly. The effect of sintering
temperature on crystallization is seen this way, clearly. Especially, Tridymide and Augite are
characteristic phases for glass foam material in literature (Fernandes 2009).
After the sintering process, dimensional change test was performed for the samples. These
results were given in Figure 2. It was shown that there are two important parameters
influencing dimensional change. The first parameter is sintering temperature, the second is
calcite addition. In general, dimensional change increases with increasing sintering
temperature up to 900 °C. Above the this temperature, vitrification effect of liquid phase
sintering mechanism cause firing shrinkage due to better sintering. Calcite addition has a
positive effect on dimensional changes for calcite addition 2.5-5 %. When the calcite addition
increased, dimensional changes decreased because of over gassing reactions. When the
reaction between CaCO3 and O2 occurs, CaO and CO2 gases form. Released gas provide
softening and expansion for matrix. This mechanism is related to foaming process. When the
foaming agent volumes increased excessively, gas pressure increases and the gas bubbles
consisting of porosities explode due to high pressure. It is possible that the pressure of CO and
CO2 gases force glass matrix and thus, gas pores shrinkage happen (Hasheminia 2012). That
the highest dimensional change value is 41.17 % was determined in calcite 5 % reinforced
sample sintered at 900 °C. Calcite addition has negative effect on dimensional changes for
some situation.

288

�45

Dimensional Change, %

40

35

30

25

20
25 C
50 C
75 C
100 C

15

10
700

750

800

850

900

950

1000

Sintering Temperature, °

Figure 2. Dimensional test results versus sintering temperature
The macro photographs of samples can be seen in Figure 3. It is clear that dimensional
changes and sintering temperatures increase in direct proportion. Increasing sintering
temperature provide better sintering. The highest dimensional changes and the most foaming
were observed in samples sintered at 900 and 950 °C. The samples including calcite 5 % were
exposed to deformation. At 750-850 °C, pores and cracks on the surfaces formed due to the
escaping gas from the decomposition of CaCO3. This situation infers that gas pressures in
these samples are maximum point. When it comes to other samples, the volume expanded and
the surfaces became smooth with increasing temperature.

Figure 3. The macro photographs of samples
The curves of porosity values of the samples depending on sintering temperature are given in
Figure 4a. Porosity values are correlation with dimensional change results. The highest
porosity value was measured in coded 50 C sample sintered at 850 °C. The samples sintered
at low temperatures have higher density and lower porosity due to the occurrence of a higher
viscosity. The maximum porosity values in this study were calculated as 49.25 % in sample
including calcite 5 % sintered at 850 °C. This value for commercial glass foam material is
about 85-95 % (Scheffler 2005). The porosity values are correlation with macro photographs
of samples. The samples containing higher calcite content have lower porosity values.
289

�The density changes with sintering temperature are shown Figure 4b. The lowest density was
measured as 0.43 gr/cm3 in 25 C coded samples sintered at 850 °C. The samples including
calcite 5 % sintered at 800-850 °C have lowest density because of their pore structure. In
these samples, pore size is not big compared to other groups but pore numbers are too much,
comparatively. Density values in commercial glass foams are about 0.1-0.3 gr/cm3 (Scheffler
2005). Apparent density of the glass foam obtained from glass-calcite mixture is about 0.4-1
gr/cm3. The density increases with increasing calcite addition. Extensive calcite addition
cause negative effect on foaming process. Higher sintering temperatures have similar effect
on foaming and densities due to better sintering and lower viscosity.

1,2

60
25 C
50 C
75 C
100 C

1,0

Density, gr/cm

Prosity, %

3

50

40

0,8

0,6

30

25 C
50 C
75 C
100 C

0,4
20

0,2
700

750

800

850

900

950

700

1000

(a)

750

800

850

900

950

1000

Sintering Temperature, °

Sintering Temperature, °

(b)

Figure 4. a) Porosities versus sintering temperature, b) Density values versus sintering
temperature
The curves of compressive straight depending on sintering temperature were given in Figure
5. These results are correlation with porosity and density values. Porosity values are inversely
proportional to the compressive strength. Compressive strength decreases with increasing the
amount of porosity. The highest compressive straight values (4.75 MPa) are gained from the
samples including calcite 10 %. In general, compressive straight decreases with increasing
sintering temperature. Calcite addition has adverse effect compared to sintering temperature
effect.

290

�Compressive Streight, MPa

5
25 C
50 C
75 C
100 C

4

3

2

1

0
700

750

800

850

900

950

1000

Sintering Temperature, °

Figure 5. Compressive straight versus sintering temperature
Figure 6 shows the typical aspect of the glass foams of all the investigated compositions. The
amount of calcite in the batch considerably affects the size and the shape of the pores. In
general, the glass foam samples have inhomogeneous microstructures with irregular pores
with a high scattering in their size (0.1–1 mm). Some pores were smaller than others, these
pores were then sealed by the glassy phase when the sintering temperature increased due to
the increasing viscosity. Since the addition of more calcite produced more gas, the pores
became larger, suddenly. This situation is also observed in similar studies (Fernandes 2009,
Bernardo 2007, Chong Liao 2012).

Figure 6. Stereo microscopy visions of samples of cross-section surface
4. CONCLUSION
XRD analysis showed that Tridymide, Cristobalite, Diopside and Augite crystalline phases
formed in the glass foams. 49.25 % is the highest porosity value in coded 5C sample sintered
at 850 °C. The lowest density 0.43 gr/cm3 was measured in coded 25C sample sintered at 850
°C. The porosity sizes increases with increasing sintering temperature. In the same time,
calcite addition has a positive effect on foaming process in general. But calcite addition
caused adverse effect on foaming process in some condition due to gas reactions. Micro and
macrostructure analysis shown that the pore sizes and shapes are very irregular and the
structures seem inhomogeneous.
291

�REFERANCES
Vavouraki A. I. Putnis C. V. Putnis A. and Koutsoukos P. G. (2008) An Atomic Force
Microscopy study of the growth of calcite in the presence of sodium sulfate, Chemical
Geology, 253, 243–251.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcite (2012).
Fernandes H.R. Tulyaganov D.U. and Ferreira J.M.F. (2009) Preparation and characterization
of foams from sheet glass and ﬂy ash using carbonates as foaming agents, Ceramics
International, 35, 229–235.
de Sousa E. Rambo C.R. Hotza D. Novaes de Oliveira A.P. Fey T. and Greil P. (2008)
Microstructure and properties of LZSA glass-ceramic foams, Materials Science and
Engineering A, 476, 89–97.
Hasheminia S. Nemati A. Eftekhari Yekta B. and Alizadeh P. (2012) Preparation and
characterisation of diopside-based glass–ceramic foams, Ceramic interanational, 38, 20052010.
Scheffler M. and Colombo P. (2005) Cellular Ceramics: Structure, Manufacturing, Properties
and Applications, wiley-vch verlag gmbh&amp;co. , Weinheim.
Bernardo E. Cedro R. Florean M. and Hreglich S. (2007) Reutilization and stabilization of
wastes by the production of glass foams, Ceramics International, 33, 963–968.
Liao Y.C. and Huang C. Y. (2012) Glass foam from the mixture of reservoir sediment and
Na2CO3, Ceramics International, 38, 4415–4420.

Sustainable Urbanization And Ecocities
Çiçek Eda, Demirkiran Özlem,
Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkiye
E-mails: edacicek@sdu.edu.tr,ozlemdemirkiran@sdu.edu.tr
Abstract
Nowadays, fears about leaving a liveable world to next generations are increased. While
sources are decreasing rapidly, demands are increasing more swiftly. In order not to restrict
next generations‘ right to live, some measures must be taken. At this point, sustainable
urbanization concept came forward. Therefore the governments brought ecocities to agenda.
In this study, the phenomena of urbanization, sustainability, sustainable urbanization are
examined briefly. Problems caused by urbanization are detected. And the ecocity approach
that implemented for the realization of sustainable urbanization is discussed. Lastly, sample
ecocities from different places are dealt with.
292

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17783">
                <text>1258</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17784">
                <text>Glass Foams Containing Fly Ash And Sheet Glass By Adding Calcite As Foaming Agent</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17785">
                <text>Ediz , Ercenk</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17786">
                <text>Glass foam is a porous isolation material used for heat isolation. In this study, the possibilities  of glass foam production using calcite as a foaming agent was investigated. The mixture was  prepared 10% wt. of waste window glass and 90% wt. Seyitömer thermal power plant fly ash.  2.5 to 10% wt. calcite was added to mixture and pressed under 75 MPa pressure by uniaxial  cold pressing to obtain cylindrical specimens. Pressed samples sintered at 750-950 °C  temperature range for 1 hour according to differential thermal analysis (DTA) results. The  effect of calcite addition and sintering temperature on the porosity, density, compressive  strength, microstructure and crystalline phases were investigated. It was determined that the properties of glass foams was changing depend on calcite addition as foaming agent and the  sintering temperature. The results showed that calcite provide foaming in specific proportions  for glass foam production.  Keywords: Calcite, fly ash, glass powder, glass foam</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17787">
                <text>2012-05-31</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17788">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="86">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General),Q Science (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1620" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2239">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/7f0a546ee7265457301d3efb10c39f35.pdf</src>
        <authentication>29b788873c2f5efa1834ff7766388db4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="13181">
                    <text>International Conference on Economic and Social Studies, 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Global and State Policy and Modern Financial Crisis
Izet Ibreljid
Faculty of Economics, University of Tuzla
ibreljic@yahoo.com
Amra Nuhanovid
Faculty of Economics, University of Tuzla
amra.nuhanovic@untz.ba
Lately dominates the impression that most holders of economic policies at
the national and global level are not willing to give up his rigorous attitude
and follow the recommendations on which there is scientific consensus is
evident. However, consistent with considerations of instructions that the
economics have been offered, would significantly reduce the frequency of
crises and the damage that they bring with them. Until today the variety of
conclusions are crystallized. Speaking of preventing financial crisis and its
practical implementation in the process of creating the optimal
macroeconomic policy is a priori highly desirable. So in the United States
adopted a plan that aims to redeem the State risky investment, while the
EU has a similar situation, because there are also carried out bank
recapitalization. Considering the above, the paper analysed and presented
the main activities undertaken on the road to recovery from the effects of
the global financial crisis, as well as the latest developments in the global
market, with special reference to the Euro zone.
Keywords: World Economic Policy, G-20, World Economic Crisis, Answers,
Challenges.

179

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2240">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/ea73a42ce8f6cc19a961e1af47bd8f5c.docx</src>
        <authentication>ceb5353539396263dd206fa590282468</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2241">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/f08640923995480cfc27568206ab616b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>149a074abb396820e02b9c7df0f09bed</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="13182">
                    <text>International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Globaland StatePolicy andModern FinancialCrisis
Izet Ibreljic
Tuzla University, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
ibreljic@yahoo.com
Amra Nuhanovic
Tuzla University, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
amra.nuhanovic@untz.ba
Abstract
Latelydominates the impressionthatmostholdersofeconomicpoliciesat the national
andgloballevelarenotwilling
togiveuphisrigorousattitudeand
follow
therecommendationson
whichthereisscientific
consensusisevident.However,consistentwithconsiderationsof instructions that the
economicshave beenoffered,wouldsignificantlyreduce the frequencyofcrisesandthe
damage
thattheybring
withthem.Untiltoday
thevarietyofconclusionsarecrystallized.Speaking
of
preventingfinancialcrisisanditspracticalimplementation
intheprocessofcreating
theoptimal
macroeconomicpolicyisa
priorihighlydesirable.So
intheUnitedStatesadoptedaplanthataimsto
redeem
theStateriskyinvestment,whiletheEUhasa
similar
situation,
becausetherearealsocarried
outbankrecapitalization.Considering
theabove,thepaperanalyzedand presentedthe main activities undertakenontheroadto
recoveryfrom theeffectsof theglobalfinancialcrisis, aswellasthelatest developmentsin
the global market, withspecialreferenceto the Eurozone.
Keywords:world
economic
crisis,answersandchallenges.

policy,

G-20,

world

economic

JEL:F01, F44

Multilateraleffort prevention plantofinancial crisis
Giventhatthemaincauseofmarketfailureeveryfinancialcrisis,theanti-crisispolicy
is
limitedmainlytotakeurgentmeasurestostopthecrisis,toreduceitsnegativeeffects,totake
theactionsnecessary
tosustaintheeconomy
incrisis,aswellasqualitativemeasuresto
overcomefromthecrisisandrestoretheeconomytoapathofsustainabledevelopment.
Recentfinancialcrisis
hasshownthatthemarketsystemisalongandindulgenttobe
deformedinsomeimportantsegmentsinwhichitisnecessary
topointout.Onthisbasis,
marketfailureshaveledtothecrisis.However,inthelastfinancial
crisishavenot
yet
discoveredalltheshortcomingsofthemarketandtherefore
theanswertothecrisisisnot
definitive. Whena crisisoccursinone sectorof the economy,there isincreasing
unemployment,createssocialproblems,etc.The oppositeis theprocess ofovercomingthe
crisis,withtherevivalofproductionincreasesemployment,economicactivity
isgradually
1

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

returningtonormal,etc.Thisleadstoconclusion
thatthecentreofactionagainstthestateof
thefinancialcrisis,theeconomy
andfinancialinstitutions.Therefore,inmostcrisesinthe
economy requirescoordinatedaction by allparticipantsinthefinancialmarkets,whichhave
beenaffectedbythecrisis.Itcoversawiderunderstandingandcreationofstrategies,plans
and
programs out of the financial crisis, then the achievement of political stability, the
adoptionofspeciallaws,acts,conductsupplementary budgetandchangesinmonetary policy
(IMF, (2009), p.116).
Recoveryfromthefinancialcrisismay
helpbetterexternalfactors,suchaseconomic
growthorgrowthintheworldprice,andthereturnofcapital.Domesticfactorsofrecovery
fromthecrisis areconsideredexternaladjustment,realcourses,lowinflation,etc. However, one
shouldtakeinto accountother effectsofthecrisis,such asthesize of the public debt,low
capacityutilization,discreditedreforms,highunemploymentandsocialcosts.Inthiscase,the
policiesthatarerecommendedforrecovery
fromthecrisisandeconomicgrowthasfiscal
discipline,increaseexports,supportinstitutionalreformandsocialpolicy.Simply
put,fiscal
policy
mustworktoreducefiscalpressureandprovidefiscalincentivestotheeconomyand
monetarypolicyshouldhelptomaintaintheliquidity
offinancialinstitutions,reduceinterest
rates, and securelendingactivityof financial markets.
Initialreactiontotheoutbreakofthecrisisfocusedonstoppingthe
spreadofpanicand
crisisinthemaintenanceofdemand(orpurchasingpower),
whichusedthefundsfromthe
budget,the CentralBank,theIMF,andother regionalfinancialinstitutions,whichhave the
taskof providingfinancialassistance.Whenit comestothepsychologicaleffect,expressed
panicinacrisisthatmakesthesituationevenworse,itisnecessary
totakeonthe
crisisfairly,
transparentlyandtimelyinform,whatisthebestway
tocombatthespreadofthefinancial
crisis.Along with that, we havetomakeastrategyto stop the withdrawal of funds from banks
andother
financialinstitutions,anddetermineguidelinesforthetreatmentofshares,stock
exchangesandsecurities.Further,it mustbe toworktowardsthestabilizationofthenational
currencyandinpreventingspeculationloans,shares,realestate,currencies,etc.Ofcourse,
thecrisismustbedesignedandrealisticadjustmentpolicies,whichfora
givenperiodrequires
savings,rationalization,denial,etc.Itshouldbebearinmindthattimeandadjustingthe
resultswillbe
thesameinallcountriesandbusinesses.Instrongereconomies,therecovery
processisusuallyfaster,butitwillwithdrawandrecoverothers.Therecovery
ofthe
developingcountriesislonger andmore difficult,because theirgovernmentandtheeconomy
weakenoughtoimplementeconomicreformsresolvemarketfailuresandeffectively
pulled
outofthecrisiscountry.Inthisconnection,there
isalwaysa
crisisshouldstrivetoprepare
systemsolutionsandcustomize themactive economic policiestoovercome the crisis.These
are
institutionalandotherqualitativechangesineconomicandfinancialsystemsthathaveto
provide sustainableeconomicdevelopmentwithout crises (IMF, (2009), p.117).
The
choiceofeconomicpoliciesinthefightagainstthefinancialcrisisdependsonthe
natureofthecrisisanditsdepth.Fiscalrestrictionsmay
be
necessary,ifwekeepinmindthat
thecrisisisoftenassociatedwithexpansionaryfiscalpolicy.Restrictivemonetary policy can
alsohelpintheeliminationofmarketpressures.However,thecriseswhichare
inseparable
fromtheproblemsofliquidity
andsolvency,thecentralbankmustbepreparedtoprovidethe
resourcesandsupportbankliquidity,butalsoto
protecttheroleofdepositorstokeeptheir
trust.Suchpoliciesusually
involvehighcostsanddonotprovideasafeeconomicrecovery.
Therefore,itwould
bemoreappropriateinthesecases,monetary
expansionthatfacilitates
2

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

lending and lowers the cost of capital throughout the economy.
Incentives,whicharestrongly
takeninlate2008andduring2009havecontributedto
mitigatingtheeffectsoftheglobalfinancial
crisis,especiallystoppingdeepereconomic
downturn.However,outofthecrisisshouldbe
change
investorbehaviorthrough
institutionalandregulatory
reform,changesinthestructureofconsumptionandproduction,
andimprovingtheworld'sfinancialsystem.In
ordertoreturnconfidenceinfinancial
institutionsandfinancialinstrumentsisnecessary
tocleanthecontaminatedassets,changein
behavior offinancial institutionsand thestrengthening ofmanagement in thefinancial
sector.Consideringtheabove,thefollowingfigureshowsthefunctionalmodelofresolving the
financial crisis.
Figure1 Functionalmodelto solvefinancialcrisis
ANSWERSOFWORLDECONOMICPOLICY THEFINANCIALCRISIS
GLOBALPLAN
FORREFORM
WORLDECONOMY
NEWINTERNATIONAL
FINANCIALARCHITECTU
RE

REFORM
Regulationand
supervision ofthe
bankingand
financialsystem

IMF

FINANCIAL
STATE
INTERVENTIO
N

GLOBAL
RISK
REDUCTIO
N

WORLD
MACROECONOMIC
MANAGEMENT
Fiscal discipline
Increasingexports
Socialpolicy

BANK

Measures and activities ofglobal andnationaleconomicpoliciestocurb the financial
crisisare:(1)Globalplantoreformandrevitalizetheworldeconomyandthecreationofa
new
international financial
architecture,
including:
transparency,
accountability,
implementationof
internationalstandardsandcodes,public
debtmanagement,financial
regulationandsupervision,fiscaldiscipline, strategy,selectionof appropriate exchangerate
policy,socialprotection,thefightagainstmoney
laundering,theestablishmentofflexible
creditlines,reformtheIMF, WB,promote greater participationof the private sector,
strengtheningthe bankingfinancialsystemtoreduce public expenditures(expendituresfor
salariesofemployeesinthepublicsector,anda
numberofsocialrightsandsocialtransfer
payableby
government)thatarenecessarytoreducethetaxburden...(2)Financialpointof
stateinterventionmeans:turningdowninterestrates,liquidity
credits,reductionofrequired
reserves, facilitating access to credit forthe central bank in orderto provideadditional
liquidity
intheglobalandnationalfinancialsystems,strengtheningthesystemofdeposit
insurance,becauseofthegreatersecurityforinvestorsandreducepanicandpressureson
bankliquidity,theintroductionofthegeneralguarantee ofbankdebt,topreventthespread of the
crisisand the collapse of banks,aswell asspecial guaranteesforinterbank claims,
measurestounblockcreditandacceleratingthe
processof
lendingwhichstimulatethe
economy.It is evidentthat theU.S. and Europe and otherdeveloped countries havedecidedto
intervenetaxpayerfundsorthebudgettostop
andpreventthespreadofthefinancialcrisisor
3

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

panic,contagion,illiquidityandinsolvency,causedbythefinancialcrisis.Fundinginthis
case,may
beinvestedinthreeways:throughloansthebudget-givenwiththecontrol
efficiencytheirusewithabusinessplan,participationinthecapitalofthebankorcorporation
whereby
thestateprovidesprofitsharingandmanagementofcertainbanksorcorporations,
andthenationalization ofthebanks (asinFrance). (3)Reductionoftheriskofglobal outbreak
of thefinancialcrisis.
Assoonasthesixprimary
prescriptionsforreducingriskofanoutbreakofthefinancial
crisis:1.avoidovervaluationof the localcurrency,allowing ittogovern itfluctuates,2.
maintaining a high level of foreign exchange reserves, 3. the maintenance of a healthy
banking system, while eliminating thecurrency, interest and conscripts disagreement, 4.
activemanagementof balanceandparticularly off-balancesheetassetsandliabilitieswiththe
surveillance techniquesandstresstestsona microandmacro level,5.avoidinghighinternal
andexternaldebt,especiallywhenitcomestotransformingtheobligationoftheprivate
sector,
and finally(6)implementation of control of capital movements.
Internationalscenarios formitigationconsequences offinancialcrisis
Economichistory remembersthelargenumber offinancialcrises,whichiswhynevertoo early
tobeginworkonitsprevention.Itisbelievedthatthepreventionandmitigationof financialcrises
successful whenthecrisiscomes.Iftakethe interventionofthe financialcrisis intheearly
stages,itwillsurelyberelativelyefficient,butastimepassesthecostsof
interventionandpreventionofexponentialgrowth.Successofmitigationofthefinancial crisis is
difficult to assess, since they register only failed attempts. Until today, many
proposedmeasuresinorder tominimize thefinancialcrisis,whichcouldinthe futurehave
strengthened thecurrent globalfinancial architecture,and improve itsfunctioning.This
includes, roughly speaking: (1) increasingthetransparency of internationalmonetary
relations,(2)
strengtheningthe
bankingandfinancialsystem,and(3)promote
greater
participationoftheprivatesector.Increasedtransparencyisakey
reform,becausefinancial
markets cannot functionwithoutadequate, reliable and fastinformationavailable. Foreign
investorsthroughtransparencycaneasilyseewherepotentialproblemslieandavoidthe excess
funds in areasthreatened bythecrisis(Soros, 1998, p. 134).
Anotherwaytoimprovethepreventionoffinancialcrisesistostrengthenthebankingand
financialsystemsindevelopingcountriessoastoimprove
the
supervisionandprudential
standards,toensurethatthebanksmeetcapitaladequacy
requirements,introduceadequate
penalties for bad loans, print and qualify reliable information the lending activities of
countries,etc.Weaknessesbankingsystemsarecommoninalldeveloping
countriesoverthe
pastdecades havepassedthroughthecrisisoflarge proportions.InthisregardtheIMF has
introducedstandardsandcodesofgoodbusiness
practiceintheareasofaccounting,auditing,
corporate
governance,paymentsystems,insurance
andbanking.Thethird
methodof
preventioninthecrisisintheeconomyisgreaterprivatesectorinvolvementintheresolution
offinancialcrisesindevelopingcountries by makingloanstorebuildandre-negotiateorwill
beprovidednewsources,andnottoimmediatelyfleethecountry,asapreconditionfor
officialaidfromtheIMF.Theessenceisthatborrowerstakesomeresponsibilityforthe
crisis,if
yougivetoo
muchshort-termloans
tounproductivepurposes.
Inotherwords,
4

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

borrowersshouldbe"takenout"ofthecrisis,ratherthanbeallowedtoeasily
getoutofthe
country.Inthisregard,theIMF hasproposedthe creationofa sovereigndebt restructuring
mechanism forthe rapid restructuring of debts in developing countries, which havethe
problem of external debtsustainability.
Thefinancialanalysismustalwaysbearinmindthefactthat,evenifyouapply
allthe
reforms,itcannoteliminateallfuturefinancialcrises.Whatwe
canhopefor
isthatthose
reformswilldiminishorreducethefrequency
anddepthofthecrisisinthefuture.Becauseof
thefrequency ofglobalcrisisinthefinancialmarkets,many countriesandtheirgovernments
havecreatedtodate,accordingtoownexperience,differentversions
ofthescenarioof
recoveryoftheworldeconomy (Ohmae,(2007)):(1)Americanscenario:Scenariosuggeststhat
inallthestatesnecessary to increasedomesticdemandinordertoprovide thegrowth ofGDP.
According
to
thisscenario
are
the
best-knownandproposalsNobel
laureates,suchas:PaulKrugman, (inorder toachievegoodeconomicresults,whileproviding
assistancetoindividuals,advisesthatthe ruling administration quickly startswithstrong
financial regulation,andCongresstodraftaplan of financial incentives,which shouldbe
focused
onconsumption.Theadministrationwillhaveto
deal
withmortgages,toreviewtheconditionsofthemortgageloan,yourproperty
andstructuresthe
significantcontrolthatwenowhaveinthefinancialsectorinawaythatwillallowprivatecapitalto
re-enter thatsphere when theBOPisthecompany getting better), JosephStiglitz believesthat
the
recovery
ofmoresubstantialinvestmentsininfrastructure,technology
andalternativeenergysources,
EdwardPrescot,saidthatresearchhasshownthattaxratesareakeyfactorindeterminingthe
economichealthofdevelopedcountries,andthewillingnesstotakerisksandproductivity-the
enginesofeconomicgrowth,whilehightax
ratesare
asureway
ofchoking
theengine,MasckinEricksaysthatcreditmarketsrequiregovernmentintervention,EdmundPhel
pspointedoutthat lack of control in themanagementofequity causesmany problems,Claiv
Gotzangerproposedinjectionof
funds
into
thebanks.(2)Russianscenario:Proposes
toholdnewBreton
Woods,inordertoprevent
thatacurrentbackupdollarworldcurrencyleadtothecollapseoftheentireworldmonetarysystem.
Topreventthisfrom
happening,weshouldintroducearegionalreservecurrency,and,sinceRussiais
thethirdcountryintheworldforforeigncurrencyandgoldreserves,itwasdecidedthattheservice
willgrowintoastrong
regionalcurrency.Inaddition,
thescenario
insistsonarranging
andorganizing
nationaland
internationalregionalinstitutes,
thentilting
large
imbalancesbetweenvolumeof
issuance
offinancial
instrumentsand
real
incomepossibilitiesofinvestmentprograms,andto
increasethe
accountabilityofpublic
companiesbefore the shareholders, to strengthen the riskmanagementsystem,
andthedisclosureof informationcompanies.(3)Chinesescenario:According totheirscenario,
the Chinese government is to overcome the negative effects ofthe crisis,a package of$ 586
billion
dollars
tofinanceinvestmentsininfrastructure,socialwelfarepayments,developmentofSMEs,andplan
ned
toincreasedomesticdemandby
lowering
taxesof17.6
billiondollars.Inthiscontext,Chinawillbe
in
thenextfewyearstoturn
moretowardsagricultureandruralareas,asintheindustry,according
to
Chineseeconomists,thereisthegreatestpotentialfor
5

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

stimulatingdomesticdemandandprovidingthe basis forastableandrelativelyrapid economic
growth.
Any
formofinternationalcooperationbetweencountriesshouldleadtosomeproposals
thatwouldpartially
undertakeinresponsetothechallengesoftheglobalfinancialcrisis.In
connectionwiththis,inthe
previoustable
presentstheinternationalscenariosforpossible
solutionstothefinancialcrisis,which,unfortunately,have
notyetbeenfinalizedand
unanimously
accepted.OneofthemisalmostimpliedpropagatedactionFedapproval1,000
billiondollarstorescuebanks(700billiondollarsforFanny
MeeandFreddyMec,and300
billiondollarsforCityGroup)aswellasnationalcorporationsandtheautomotiveindustry.
Also,severalexpertssuggestedthescenariowiththedivisionoftheworldintothreeblocksof
countries(Eastern,AmericanandEuropean),while othershavesuggested acompletedivision
oftheworldinwhichthere
willbenocommonblocksandinstitutions.Eachcountry,inthis
finalversion,I hadtotakecareofthemindependently,whichmeansthatthestatehas strengthened
tothemaximumimpactonthe
economy.
However,
withexistingsevere
financialproblemsduetothestrugglefor
theredistributionof
theworld'sresources,there
wouldbeanincrease
ininternationaltensionsandeven
armedconflict.Onthisbasis,the
naturalconsequenceof the newsituationontheworldeconomic scenewouldweakenthe
influenceofdollars, whichwould no longerbe theworld'sreservecurrency.At the same time,
wouldreducetheimportanceoftheeuro.MostoptimisticscenarioisoneinwhichtheU.S.
hadsuccessfully overcomeavery seriouseconomiccrisis,whileBrazil,Russia,India,China
managedtocopewiththeeconomicslowdownandaccepttheworkofcommoninternational
financialinstitutionsasthebestremedy
tosolveproblems.Especially,therearescenarios
Chinese
government,becauseitisfocusedonmeasurestoencourageitsconsumption(i.e.the
abolitionof taxesonsales of cars withsmallengines, 74millionpeople withlowincomes
wouldreceive the appropriate subsidies,retiredstate employeeswillreceive inadditiontoa
pension,12millionteachers willreceivea highersalary,etc.). However,inthisvariantof the real
economicpowerand still be on the fast-growing economies.
Preventivemeasurestaken by governmentsandcentral
forleaving the worldfinancialcrisis

banksinsome

countries

Sincethelastfinancialcrisishitthewholeworldeconomy,manygovernmentswere
forcedtorescuetheinternationalfinancial
system,withpriority
giventoensureeconomic
recovery.Inthisregard,anumber ofmeasures were takentoimprovethefinancialstability,
includinginjectingcapitalintofinancialorganizations,a significantexpansionof guarantees
forbankliabilities
bythecentralbankrecapitalization,andvariousliquidity
programs.Ontheglobalfinancialcrisisarethe firsttomeetthegovernmentandthecentralbanksof
developed
countriesandthemeasurestakenincreasedmarketliquidity,primarily
byreducingthebasic
interestrateandthrowlargeamountsofmoney
intothefinancialsystem.Stateaidpackages
are
rehabilitatedlossesoffinancialinstitutionsandstrengthenedcore capitalfor the credit function
ofbanks,whichhaveabusiness perspective. Financial assistancewas providedfunds of state
financialinstitutions. In additiontothe recapitalization were
used, and other
measures,suchasvarioustypesof guaranteesof interbanktransactions,the purchase of
6

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

troubled assetsfrom banks,toguaranteethedebtsoffinancialinstitutionsandcompanies,etc.
Thedecisionsofcentralbanksonsecuringliquidity
andmeasuresofloanguaranteefinancial
sectorby
thegovernmentandparliamentsofmostcountrieshaveprovedtobeeffectivein
preventingthecollapseof the globalfinancialsystem(FSA, 2009,p.45).Indeveloping
countries, governments have had to confront the economic slowdown through monetary
policy,supportprogramsfor jobcreation,expansionof socialsecurity, etc.Inaddition,the
governmentundertook awide range of measurestofacilitate financialproblemsof business,
improvebusinessenvironment,fiscalandother
incentives.Sectormeasuresarefunneledinto
thehardest-hitsectors,especially
intheautomotiveindustry,constructionandtourism.In
general,thecurrentactionplanscoordinatedgovernmentsofaffectedlastworldfinancial crisis
were aimedat:theefficient operations ofthe regulated financial markets, greatercontrol
rating agencies, greater regulation of speculative hedge funds and other previously
unregulatedfinancialproducts,harmonizationof
accountingandauditingrulesempowering
theIMF, etc.
However,thereisnosinglemodelisapplicableandeffectiveforeachcountry.Common
toallrecovery
plansthatincludemeasurestorestoreliquidity.Thebasicdifferencebetween
therecovery
plansofindividualcountriesrelatestowhetherornottheirfinancialsectorwas
directlyexposedtothetroubledsecurities.Therefore,twogroupsofcountriessuchasthe
USA,GreatBritain,Germany,Austria,Italy, Sweden, France,Russia,whose financialsector
hasbeendirectly exposedtotroubledsecuritiesandwhoserecovery plansmustincludethe funds
needed to recapitalizebanks. Theseare recoveryplans inwhich theywriteoffthelosses
ofthebankingsectorandreducethecapitalbaseofbanksandtheircreditcapacity.In
additiontosupportthe recapitalizationof banksbankingsystemincludessignificantfunding
forinter-bankguarantees,inordertohelprestore
thecreditmechanismandconfidenceinthe
bankstotheeconomyrestarted(FSA,2009,p.46). Thesecondgroupconsistsofcountries whose
bankswere not exposed to troubled U.S. securities, such as Poland, the Czech
Republic,SlovakiaandSlovenia,whichhaveahealthy
banking
system,butitisacrisis
involvesexternalshocks.Theyare alsodirectlyexposedtotheproblemsthatare happeningin
thefinancialmarketoftheEU,especiallyhamperedtheinflowofforeigndirectinvestment
andadropinforeigndemand.Theirrecoveryprogramsweremainlyfocusedontheprovision
offinancialassistancebycentralbanks,particularlytheEuropeanCentralBank.Evensome
of
themhaveextendedschedules insureddeposits,tocover alarger depositpotentialandnew
financialinstitutions.Indoingso,somebanksare
recapitalized,andtheother
isthestate
boughtone package of shares.Increasedthenumber of securitiesthatthecentral bank accepts
whenapprovingyour loanapprovedandwithita significantamountoffunds the banking
sector.Governmentsofdevelopedcountrieshaveprovidedforashortperiodoftimedifferent
incentivepackagestohelp inordertomitigatethenegativeconsequencesoftheglobal financial
crisis.This packages contented:infrastructure technology, energy,unemployment, budget
deficits, tax cuts, rural areas, technological innovation, sustainable development,
socialprotection,green technology,pension systems,etc.ThefinancialsectorsoftheUnited
Kingdom,Germany,Austria,Italy,Sweden,FranceandRussiawere directly exposedtothe
toxicassets,andrecoveryplansareprimarilyincludedfundstorecapitalizebanks.Besides,banks
also included funds for inter-bank guarantee in order to help restore the credit
mechanismand confidencein thebank to get theeconomygoing again.

7

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

So,itwasastate-ownedfinancialsectortopreventavarietyofbankruptcy.
Inthis
connection,thelargestpackageoffinancialassistanceprovided by theU.S.Government(787
billiondollars)andtheGovernmentofChina(586billiondollars).
(FSF,(2008),p.4).In
addition,thecentralbanksofthedevelopedcountriesaremitigatedmaximummonetary policy
by
loweringbenchmarkinterestratesandtakenothermeasuressuchasthepurchaseof
governmentsecurities,bonds,andevencompanieswiththeaimtolaunchhaltedactivity
on
worldfinancialmarkets.Consideringtheinsufficientrecovery
oftheU.S.economy,theFed
hasdecidedthatthenexteightmonths"tofillin"
600billiondollarsto
theU.S.securities
markets,inordertoencouragetherecovery
oftheAmericaneconomygottired.Immediately
there wasa rise inoilprices,the valueof sharesonthe stockmarketandthe strengthening
euro.UrgentnecessityofeconomicincentivesintheU.S.hasbeenrecognizedduringthe
Bushadministrationinearly
2008.Eventhenforthispurposeapprovedapackageworth168
billiondollarsorslightly
morethan1%ofGDP.However,thefirststimulusdidnotprovide
anythingmorethanatemporary
andshort-termreliefinthefinancialsystemandthehousing
market.
EconomicincentiveIIoccurredduringtheObamaadministration(Recoveryand
Reinvestment Act of2009, ARRA). Theplanincluded the over 800billion. dollars (about
300
billionrelatedtotaxrelieftocitizensandbusinesses,250billionwent
tostateandlocal
governments with financial problems, 150 billion variety of infrastructure projects, 100
billionadditionalsupporttoworkerswhohavelosttheirjobs,etc.)
(Zandi,(2010),p.229).In
addition, the Act of the emergency economic stabilization USA which is the de facto
approved 700 billion dollars(Zandi,(2010), p. 230).On the basisof thisplan, executed the
purchasetroubledassets,especiallymortgagecoveredsecurities,whichrecapitalizedfinancial
institutions.Inotherwords, the site wasclearedof non-coveredbanksof their assetsby
purchasingsecurities,torevivethecreditmechanism.NotingtheU.S.aidpackagewould
needtoincludetemporary
taxcuts,investmentininfrastructure,aidtocitizenswholosttheir
home, etc.
Maincountriesanti-crisismeasuresmemberstatesoftheEU
Asfortheindividualanti-crisismeasuresthatweremadeatthelevelofthegovernments
oftheEUmemberstates,mostcountriesimplementedtheausteritymeasurestoreducepublic
debtandensuremedium-termfiscalsustainability.Mostofthelessdevelopedmembershad
or
continuestohave programsof budgetsupportthroughtheIMFloan,whichinclude savings
programsandstructuralreforms.Inordertoreduce thenegative impact of the globalfinancial
crisis,a number of Europeancountrieshaveincreasedtheamountofguaranteeddepositsin
banks.Thus,theEuropeanCommission5thDecember2009issueda
declarationonthe
recapitalizationofbanksinordertopreserveandsmoothfunctioningof
theworldfinancial
markets(theso-calledEuropeanEconomicRecovery
Plan,EERP).Untiltheabovedate,the
Commissionhasalready
approvedrecapitalizationschemesinthethreemembercountriesas
wellassomeindividualbanks'recapitalization.However, given thatthenature,scope and
conditions of recapitalization mayquitedifferentfrom casetocase,the EUmember statesand
individualbanksrequiremoredetailedguidancefromtheCommissiononthepossibility
of
recapitalization.Asthemostimportantobjectivesoftherecapitalizationare
listedrestoring
financialstability andconfidence,establishsmoothfinancingoftherealeconomy aswellas the
prevention of systemic adverse effects due to the insolvency of individual banks.
However,they
areidentifiedandpotentialrisksforthecompetitivenessofthebankingsector,
8

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

onthreedifferentlevels:(1)bankrecapitalization
inoneMemberStatecannotgiveanunfair
advantageoverbanksinothermemberstates,(2)withinonecountrydoesnotgiveanunfairadvanta
getobanksinrelationtoothers,and(3)capitalincreasemay
notbeplacedinaless
competitivepositionofthosebanksthataretryingtoborrowonthemarket,orshouldaspire
togovernmentrecapitalizationtotheleastextent
displaceprivatesectorNotwithstandingthe
strengtheningof interventionistpoliciesandprotectionism,theEU continuedtosupportthe
policyofopenmarkets,growthandprosperity.Accordingly,mostoftheEUplanproposes
thefollowing:efficiently
creatingplansforsavingpublicbanks,centralbanksshouldtakeon
therole of clearinghousefor interbankmarkettoagainrestoreconfidenceamongcommercial
banksandestablishedasystemofinter-banklending,itisnecessary
toimplement
rehabilitationprogramstoincrease GDPinthe EU countriesand accelerate the reformof the
financial incentivemarkets.Inaddition,proposednewlegislationoneconomic governance.
Specifically,itistougherpenaltiesagainstEUmemberstatesunlessit
isdemonstratedby
controlling publicfinances. Penalties will be at 0.2% of GDP,while in the process of
punishmentwillbe
includedinthosecountriesthatfailtocontroltheirannualspendingor
reforming the economyin order to improve competitiveness.
Itisnecessary toemphasizethattheaforementionedmeasures,includedintheplanof recovery
fromtheglobalfinancialcrisis,andtherelatedfinancialsupportfortheunemployed
andpoorhouseholds,investingininfrastructureprojects,energy,temporary
taxcuts,
environmental,socio-economic objectivespromotionofGreenfieldinvestment,labour market
flexibility,protection ofemployees, businessdevelopment,enhancing competitiveness,etc.in
allthesementionedactivities,specifically
notedthatGermanyhasreducedsocialsecurity
contributions(which shouldreducelabourcostsandincrease privateconsumption), increased
socialspending,public
investmentininfrastructure,schools,healthcare,investedinthe
automotive industry,encourage privateinvestment,increase loanstoSMEs,etc.(CPU,2009).
The latest activities of the European Commission during the 2012 were focused on
establishingthe European framework for preventing and resolving (banking) crisis,to
taxpayersandtheeconomy inthefuture,protectfromtheeffectsofthebankruptcy ofbanks.
Sucha frameworkwouldrepresentthe firstphase of whichisinthe bankingunion.The
proposalinvolvesvery
closecoordinationbetweenMemberStatesandtoauthorizethe
competentauthoritiestoshareholdersmay
forcebanksthemselvesbearmostofthelossesif
theirbanksintocrisis.Thereasonforthiskindofactivityisthefactthatthefinancialcrisisof2008the
yearthatthebigbanksshouldbailoutbecausethey
are"toobigtofail",orbecause
suchbankscollapsecallsintoquestionthestability oftheentirefinancialsystem,soitis cheaper
tosave thanruntheir bankruptcy.The problemisthattherescueof these banksgoing
totheexpenseoftaxpayers,andnotattheexpenseoftheirrespective
owners.Ontheother
hand,thebankingunionwouldbe basedona commonschemeforinsurance of bankdeposits,
thecommonEuropeansupervisory
body
thatwouldhavetheauthoritytomakedecisions
regardingsystemically
importantandbankswithcross-borderoperations,andthecommon
fundfor thefinancingofcontrolled"fire" suchbanksandcoordinated setofinstrumentsand
harmonized procedures.
The proposalof the EuropeanCommissionhastherefore,a seriesof measuresandactions
toaddressthecrisis,andthekey
elementsarepreventionandearly
intervention.The
competentauthoritiesinthememberstatestoresolvethecrisiswouldhavetheauthorityto
askthebankstodrawupplansforrecoveryandrestructuringcasestodealwithfinancial
9

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

stress.Competentauthoritieshavetherighttointerveneatanearly
stage,beforethecapital
levelfallsbelowtherequiredminimumlevel.Thesepowersincludethepossibility
ofthe
dissolutionof thebank andtheappointmentofaspecialmanagementbefore bankruptcy,the
righttoconvenea shareholders'meetingtoadoptimmediate reforms,and requiresthebankto
setupincooperationwiththecreditorsrestructuringdrawupaplanfor
thedebt.Proposedby
theCommission,eachMember
Statewillneedtoalsoestablishafund
towhichthebanksand
investment funds to payfees depending on the riskprofile.
Thesefunds
would
fund
controlled"fire"
troubledbanks.
Eachfundwouldbe
responsibleforthebankonitsterritory,whilefor
thoseoperatinginmultiplecountriesagreedarrangementsbetweenthecompetentauthorities
inthosecountries.Bankswere regularsubscriberstothefunds ayear to1% of the amount of
depositsguaranteed
bythestate.Itisemphasizedthatthefundscanbeusedonly
for
restructuringor
orderly
conductofbankruptcy
ofinsolventbanks,andnotforrescueor
assistancetobanks,on
whatbasiswouldtheythenacquiredoveranunfairadvantageoverthe
competition. It is especially important to prevent irresponsible banks use other people's
money, based on asoundpremisethat in the eventof aproblem to the aid of thestateto lend.
However,
theremovalofthese
structuralandinstitutionalproblemsatthesystemlevelis
notdone
allthatisnecessary.Interventionsundertakeninthefinancialsectorthroughthe
variousformsoffinancialsupport(additionalliquidity,recapitalization,takingrisky
assetsor
contaminated),and variousformsofguaranteesandliabilities,eventemporarynationalization
of certain financial institutions, have given good results in terms of getting out of the
recession, credit growth activities, and some financial institutions have already realized
profitsthankstothewrite-offlosses.Inadditiontotheformer,we
needanewfinancialand
institutionalinterventionsduringrecovery
andgrowthbasedonnewcreditandinvestment
expansion.Thekey
istocreatesystemsolutionsthatwillminimizetheriskofnewcrises.In
thissense,itis necessary toimproveregulationin monitoringsustainablefiscalandmonetary
policy
andprudentialdisableaccesstothesystempressuresasawholethrougha
better
understandingofrelationshipfinancialandrealsectorsandtheirvulnerability
intermsof
shocksandeconomic contraction,andthrougha better systemof monitoringandearly
warning,improveriskmanagement,developcooperationwithother
countries,effectively
implementregulatory
measuresandquicktoreact,withcaution(whichisneededfortherisk
assessment)with theintroduction of financial innovations.
Proposals andrecommendationsofsome economists’ possible wayspreventionof
financialcrisis
Many
economistsstilldonotdaretowriteseriousarticleswhichledtoconcreteproposals
onpossiblewaystopreventthisfinancialcrisis.However,duetothecomplexity
ofthecase
studies,itisnecessarytobrieflyinthe
sequeltoexposethemostconstructivesuggestionsand
recommendationsmosteconomic expertsonthepreventionandcontrol ofthefinancialcrisis in
economictheory.
Stiglitzproposalprimarily
relatedtoreformingandmodernizingtheworld'sfinancial
institutions, in terms of greater accountability, transparency and openness to the less
developed countries(Stiglitz,(2004), p. 239).Accordingtohisanalysis, Stiglitzbelievesthat
fromtheglobalfinancialcrisisandeconomicrecessiononlygetthe2013,butstillsuggests
10

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

thattheworldfinancialarchitectureismorefragiletoday
thanbeforethecrisisandthatthe
questioniswhenwillithappenagain.Whathasbeendonesofarinthearea
ofreformofthe
globalfinancialarchitecture isbad,thebankshave takenbillionsof dollarsfromthestateand
continuedtodoso.Thisiswhy Stiglitzfor"NewWorld"orthe"newcapitalism".Keepingin mind
the currentstate ofthe global economy, theNobellaureate proposesan interesting setof
measuresthatshouldbetaken(buttheiruseisassumedtobeglobally
changingsociety
from
theroots):theconstitutionofthebodythathasmostpowersandgreaterrepresentativeness
thananybodywhichexiststoday
becauseglobalcrisisrequiresaglobalresponse.Existing
institutionsareinadequatetothemomentthatthey
knewit,andsomehavecontributedtothe
crisishappen.
Furthermore,itisnotequallyproportionalrepresentationinthevotingstructure
oftheinternationalfinancialinstitutions,therefore,needamoredemocraticrepresentation,
andtheintroductionofanewglobalreserve systemwithonecurrency, weneedamultilateral
systemthatdoesnotdependonthecurrencyofacountry,itisnecessarytoconnectallthecurrencies
(modelled on SPV) to create a global currencythat would be permanent. In addition, the
global financial reform would involve greater control and supervision of financial
markets, reducing incentives forbankers, etc.(Stiglitz, (2004), p. 265).
Proposal,whichwasbasedonaradicalreformofkey
actorsoftheworldfinancialsystem
gavealsoWaldenBello,
(Reis,Guilherme,(2004),p.3)aprofessorattheUniversityofthe
Philippines. Specifically,Bellobelievesthat theproblemisinthestructureandorganizational
cultureoftheworld'sfinancialinstitutions
(IMFandWorldBank),andthelackof
responsibilityoftheMinistryofFinanceoftheUnitedStatesandalackoftransparency.
That'swhyheis proposing the elimination of allstructural adjustment programs in
developing
countriesandincountriesthatare
incrisis,thenreducingthenumberofprofessionalstaffin
thesefinancialinstitutionsandreduceoperatingcosts.Themostimportant
thinginallthisis
thecreationoftheGlobalCommissionontheFutureoftheIMF,inwhichhalfthemembers of the
Commissionshouldbe representativesfromnon-governmentalorganizations,because they
arecivilsociety organizationsthathaveplayedadecisiveroleinthediscovery of destructive and
undesirable effects of theadjustment program.
ProposalRobertA.Mundell,
(Little,Oliveo,(1999),p.9)aprofessorattheUniversity
of
Columbia,accordingtowhichintheXXIcenturyshouldfinally
gettocreateanewworld
financialorder,wasreflectedinthefollowing:the
U.S.,JapanandtheEUshouldintroducea
commoncurrency (“intor”)anduniquetheglobalfinancialsystem.World'smajorcurrencies the
dollar, theyenandthe eurowouldhave afixedexchangerate, one over another. Japan's central
bank to implement monetaryreform andthe fixedexchangerate in the ratio 100yen to the
dollar, while theECBfixed euroexchangeratein the ratio of one euro to onedollar. Other
currenciestopegtheir coursesforone ofthe aforementionedcurrencies,whichisdominantin
thefield.FormedwouldbetheCentralBankoftheworld,whowouldworkunderthe
currency
boardandstrictly
tocontrolthatnocountry
in"intor”notprintmoneywithout
backing.Accordingtohim,thecentralbankoftheworldrepresentedby
theIMF,morein
termsofcoordinationof thewhole business.Inthiscase,the Board ofGovernors would
appointanoperationalbody whichwouldbecomposedofrepresentativesofthecentralbanks of
11

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

the
threelargestandmostdevelopedeconomic
entitiesintheworld(Japan,U.S.,EU).
Speculators,who earnedbillionsof dollars onthe exchangerate differentialsbetweenthe
world'scurrencies,woulddefinitely
losetheirjobs,andtheriseofglobalGDPwouldbe
doubled.Hebelievesthattheeuroopenedtheway
"intor".Specifically,theeurowasfirst
broughttothefundamentalchangesintheconfigurationoftheworldfinancialsystem,and
thebestway tounderstanditscontributiontothenewworldorderwouldbetorealizethe monetary
differencesandmovethecapitaltothenewmodelsoftheinternationaleconomy. Because of this
great country are viewed as entities that are interconnected different currencies,fixedor
flexible
exchange
rate.
Theessence
of
hisideaswastocreate
a
global
Crosscurrencybalanceandtopresentanewconfigurationoptionsworldcurrencies.Ifall
three
currency areas Isles stable prices, then among them should rule Cross currency exchange
rate stable.Today,Mundellinsisted onthe adoptionof hisproposalinthe circles of
therichandhighly
developedcountries.Ifhisplantostabilizetheexchangeratebetweenthe
threelargestcurrency wasadopted,itwouldallowasufficientincreaseinworldGDP.Onthe other
hand,itcouldincrease thechancesof developmentandglobaleconomic stability,which would
be expanded, andthe under-developedareas of theworld.
RobertZoellick,(Rargavajas,(2009), p.15),WorldBankpresident,saidthatthe consequences of
the
global financial
crisis for years. Zoellick argues that refers
to the
changingglobaleconomic map,soa strongcontributiontothe growthof the worldeconomy
given numerouscountries.Inthisconnection,the statusofthe dollar asreservecurrency,
accordingtohimisnolongersafe.Accordingtohim,theglobalcrisishadtolearn topredict.
Therefore, it is necessary to create a group of finance ministers who will be able
tocomprehend the problems in time. Multilateralism is necessary to develop a clearly
constructedasenseofsharedresponsibility forthe sound basisof globalpolitical economy.In
addition,itmustbe flexibleandinvolveactorswiththegreatestinterestintheeconomy. G-7
mustbe connectedalsoBrazil,China,India,Mexico,Russia, SaudiArabiaand SouthAfrica,
thentheneedtoexpandtheFinancialStability
ForumandtheIMF,strengthenfinancial
supervision,multilateralnetworktoconnectwiththeenergy
andclimatechangenegotiations
ofnewmechanismsforthe protectionofforests,developnew technology,to providefinancial
assistancetopoor countries, etc.
AccordingtoGeraldCélente(“economicNostradamus”)contemporary
worldand
civilizationswillemergefromthefinancialcrisisonly
ifitisabletolaunchnewproduction
capacity,whichgofurtherthanthenewtechnologiesfor
alternativeenergy.Hisforecastsare
fairly concise,butwithoutany concretesolutions:thecollapseoftheglobalfinancialsystem,
recessionanddepression,lackofhealthyfood,alcoholism,poverty inthecities,crime pandemic,
pandemic diseases, riots, wars, etc. According to him, the economic tragedy Greeceonly
the"beginningoftheend"thattheworldexpects.Manyhavecharacterizedthe
globalcrisisasacrisisofcapitalismbutCelentethinksisactually thedestructionofhuman nature.
Like hispredecessor,PaulKrugman(Krugman, (2012), p. 66)alsobelievesthat itis necessary
torestructuretheglobalfinancialsystemandimposestricterregulationsinorderto
avoidrepetitionof the financialcrisisof major proportions.However, heexpressedconcern
thatthereformmomentumwearsoff,
becausethere isnopoliticalwilltodoso.Accordingto
12

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

him,thegovernmentshouldbe more severe,becausefinancialmanagerscontinue to"reap"
giganticbonusesandprofits.Becauseoftheslowandpainfulrecoveryfrom
theglobal
financialcrisis,unemploymentintheU.S.reacheditspeakinearly
2011.Therefore,the
government,accordingtohim,shouldhelppeopleretainjobs,basicwages,socialservices
andhealthcare,
andoneofthewaystoovercomethecrisiscouldbeaglobalplanto
encourageinvestmentingreentechnology,andamoreseriousapproachtoclimatechange
that
could help keep the level of demand. Essentiallysuggestions Krugman go towards
liberalizationofinternationaltransactions, the liberalizationofdomestic financial markets,
the emphasisonthestabilityofworldpricesofrawmaterials,energy andfoodproducts,and
finally
establishingfiscaldiscipline.Obviously,thelackoftransparencyisattherootofthe
currentfinancialcrisis,andthuslong-termpolicy
shouldbefocusedonincreasingthe
transparency
ofstructuralfinancialproducts.Inconnectionwiththis,inhisopinion,thereare
atleasttwomovesthatshouldbe consideredatthe multilaterallevel,including:the role of
creditrating agenciesand maturitymismatch in non-banking financial institutions.
Thelackofaccuratepredictabilityofthefinancialcrisisineconomichistoryiswhat
most
intriguing contemporary macroeconomists is.Thus,accordingtoPaulSamuelson anticipated
recoveryoftheglobaleconomyuntilthe2014(Samuelson,2009).
Analyzingthedeepercausesof thefinancialcrisis,Samuelsonbelievesthata similar situation
occurredinthe periodbetweenRoosevelt'sinaugurationinMarch1933 andthe beginningof
World WarII. The lifespan of this Nobel Prize winner allowed him to experience the
economic
cyclemakesafullcircle,andstatedthattheglobaleconomy
iscomingback,
Keynes,accordingtowhichtaxpolicy
anddeficitspendingareconsideredasmajor
determinantsinthemanagementofthemarketeconomy.Inthiscontext,akey
Samuelson
proposalisaimedatrestoringpeople'sconfidence inthe globalfinancialsystem,despite the
yearsbeforethefinancialcrisisbuiltupasa"houseofcards"withamoreriskyandtoxicfinancial
derivatives.
Nuriel Roubini believes that overly optimistic assessment of the current situation
regardinghealthoftheAmericaneconomy couldbepremature(Roubini,2008).
RoubinisaysthatshouldnotbeexcludedinthefutureanotherverystrongrecessivewaveintheU.S.
andglobaleconomy,aftersummarizingtheeffectsofpaststimulusmeasurestaken bythe U.S.
government to buttress the rapidly
deflating as soon revived the American
economyafterthecrisis.Hewas theonlyonewhopredicted thefinancial crisis in the U.S.He
stillwarnsthatthe Fedwillbe a greatchallenge,because oftheskillstobe a leadinginterest rate
policy,much
willdependonthe
U.S.,andthe
globaleconomy.Roubiniannounces
possible"W"recessionandbelievesthatitisnotoverbecause
oftheriskassociatedwiththe
cessationof(monetary andfiscal)stimulusinmostdevelopedcountries.Accordingtohim, there
couldbe uptostag-deflation(recessionanddeflation), ifthe state andthe government
increasetaxes,reducespendingandliquidity
toreducefiscaldeficits.Inaddition,foodand
energy
pricesrisemuchfasterthantheyshould,sothisisoneofthereasonsforitsannounced
"W"recession.
Accordingtothe
interpretationofGermaneconomistsMaksOtea(Ote,(2009),p.120)
financialcrisesaremainly duetothefollowingreasons:thefinancialsectorisdeveloping faster
thanthe
realsectortoGDP,inadequateeconomicpoliciesof
developedcountries,
13

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

leadingtoincreasingdebtandinflatetherealestatebubbleandotherfinancialderivatives.
Thepossiblecollapseoftheworldfinancialsystemwarnedbackin2005andpointsoutthat
in2001.Thefinancialorderwasso"sick"thatcouldcollapseatany
momentoccurred.
Financialcrisiscontainsa"crisisofinformation,"
because
itisassumedthatmultinational
corporationsandlargeprivateactorsinthefinancialmarketsmay
determinethatthe
informationandmanipulatethem(orspeculate),whichisdefinitely
notgoodfortheworld
economy.Therefore,stockexpertOte
offersaprogramof
a
fewpointsinnoparticular,
emphasizesthatinvestmentincertainactionssaferthanrealestate,goldisstillthenumber
oneinvestmenttoolforemergenciesandtohumanbehavior(attheoutbreakofany
crisisis
almostalwaysa criticalfactor) cannotbepredicted withempiricalaccuracy,evenwhen
something like the financialcrisisforecastersconstantlytrying.
Thus,some
importantlessonsfromwell-knowneconomistsinthe
internationaleconomy
resultingfromacareful studyofthecurrentfinancialcrisis.Learnfromothers' mistakesisnot
easy,butitismuchfasterandmoreefficiently bylearningontheirownmistakes.Therefore, the
financialcrisis confirm someof their mostimportant recommendations, in order toresolve
seriouseconomicproblems,increase thelevelofconfidence andreducethe risks arisingfrom
the financial sector.
Possible scenarios for a new worldfinancialsystem
Thefollowingisabriefoverviewofa
few“good"and"bad"
scenariosthatcouldhavea
majoreffectonglobaleconomicdevelopmentsandtrendsduringthe2013,andthatthey
are
madeby MorganStanleyanalysts:(1)restoreinflation,(2)therealestatemarketintheU.S. has
stagnated.(3)Japan'scentral bankwasbuyingEurobonds inanattemptto devaluetheyen
againsttheeuro.(4)Italianpoliticsrevivescycleofcrisis.(5)GreeceremainsintheEU,
whileresearchinearly2013suggeststhatthe EUandtheUnitedKingdomcome.(6)UK officially
givingupthefightagainstinflation.(7)TherecessionisreturningtoAustralia.(8)
Emergingmarketgrowthcontinuesapathofgrowthdrivenby
investmentandexports.(9)
Shocking Chinese restrictions could cause credit problems that could threaten both the
Chinese and global economy.(10)Asiaincreasedexports.(11)Back to the"Soviet Union."
Besides,severaleconomicandfinancialgurusarealsorangwithalarmingforecastsfor
2013(NourielRoubini,MarcFaber,Larry
Edelson,KyleBassandothers).Notonly
doesit
provide for thecontinuationof theeconomicandfinancialcrisisaswellasitsexpansioninto the
field armed struggle!So Roubiniin May2012announced that the2013crisis hitthe world
sharperthanthose from 2008. As “Dr. Ruin” says, therecession in Europecreates
theausteritymeasures, thestrong euro,thecreditcrisis in theperipheral countries
oftheeuroareaandthe lackof consumer confidence.Inaddition,he saidthatthisyear
couldoccur blockade aroundtheworldfinancialsystem.Thiscouldresultinfivefactors:the
debtcrisisinEurope,
China'seconomyisshaky,theslowdowninemergingmarkets,theriskofrisingoilpricesdue tothe
developmentofIran'snuclear
programandthe
U.S."fiscalgap."Swissinvestor
and
financialadviserMarcFaberforhisthinkingofthenickname"DoctorDoom."
Faberpredicts
thattheU.S.governmentbeginsnew warsinresponsetothe economiccrisis.On the other
hand,financialanalystLarry
Edelsonin2013alsoseewar,andthatpredictionisbasedonthe
14

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

theoryofthecycleofwar,whichtellsaboutthelawsunderwhichcompaniesfallintoastate
ofwar.AccordingtoEdelson,war cycletheorysuggests2013asoneinwhichthey could breakor
inflamewarsinfluencedeconomic
developments.Also,AmericanbusinessmanJim
RogerswarnsthatcontinuedfinancialrescueindebtedEuropeancountriescouldprovokea
newworldwar,becausewarweaponscouldbeboostedtradewar.EconomicanalystKyle
Bassbelievesthatwarsoftenemerge asa resultof the economicdecline.In2013willbe
restructuredbillionsofdollarsofdebts,andmillionsofreasonabledepositorswilllosea
large
percentageof itspurchasing power.
TheUNhassetitsforecastfor
2013expressedmildwordsoftheaboveframework.
Specifically,theUNpredictsglobaleconomicgrowthrateof2.4%in2013andfrom3.2%in2014.
Thisslowgrowthwillnotbenearly
enoughtoovercomeunemployment,withwhich
many
countriesarefacing.Withexistingpoliciesandgrowthtrends,EuropeandtheU.S.will
takeatleastfiveyearstomakeupforlostjobscausedbytheGreatRecession2008and2009.
BearinginmindtheUNforecasts,belowemphasizethekey
elementsofhisreport:(1)Inthe
eurozoneeconomy will2013growby only 0.3%,andthe2014by 1.4%,whichwouldbea
shortstepforthebettercomparedtoadropof0.5%wasrecordedinthe2012.(2)U.S.
predictsmodestgrowthin2013and2014,althoughtherealestatemarketstartedtoshow
signsofrecovery.ThustheU.S.GDPin2013shouldgrowby only1.7%,whichis0.4% slower
thanthe
rate
ofgrowthof
2.1%
in2012.(3)
Therewillbemoretoslowdownthe
Japaneseeconomy,whichwillgrowthisyearby0.6%,andthe20140.8%,comparedwith 1.5%
lastyear.(4)The
economicproblemsof
Europe,the
USAandJapanwillbe
in
developingcountriesthroughweakerdemandforexportproducts
tothesecountriesand
increased instabilityin capitalflows and commodityprices.
TheU.S. National IntelligenceCouncil (NIC)issued areport, "Global Trends 2030:
AlternativeWorlds,"whichstatesthattheimpactoftheU.S.andtheglobaleconomy
inthe
coming decades of decline, and will until 2030 China will become the world's largest
economy. WithChinawillbecomea neweconomic giantsandIndiaandsomeotherAsian
countries.U.S.willnotfadeonly
ineconomicterms,butwilldeclineinthecomingyearsand
itsimpacton globalpolitics.Inthatsamereportcitesthefollowing"good"scenarios:(1)11 new
economic
giants:Bangladesh,Egypt,Indonesia,Iran,Mexico,Nigeria,
Pakistan,
Philippines,SouthKorea,TurkeyandVietnam,shouldbe2030wasabletotakehiseconomic
positionof the EU.Incombinationwiththe major economiesofChina andIndia,thesegiants
willbe11newcentreofglobalpowerwouldmovefromWestto
East,and
(2)Theworldwith8.3billionpeople.The
world's2030weresupposedtoliveabout8.3billionhumans(as
comparedto7.1billionfrom2012).Abouttwo-thirdsoftheworldpopulationby2030will
liveincities.Mostofthepopulationwillhave accesstoadvancedtechnology and healthcare,
and most countries, led by China and the United States, will develop international
cooperation.However,thegrowthoftheworldpopulationwillleadtoconflictsoverwater
andfood,especiallyintheMiddleEastandAfrica,andwillleadtoinstability
oftheglobal
economic collapse.Thereportalsocites8potentialworstcase scenarios,calledas"black swans"
globaltrendsfor2030:(1)severe pandemic,(2)morerapidclimatechange,(3)the collapse ofthe
EU/euro,(4) orfailure ofthe democratizationof China,(5)(not) thereformed Iran,(6)nuclear
war,weapons of mass destruction, cyber-attacks, (7) geomagneticsolarstormcoulddestroy
15

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

satellites,powernetworkandmanysensitiveelectronicdevices,and(8)the
disappearanceofAmericanpower.Thesechallengesandrisksarebestillustrated by Figure2.

Figure2 Key risksto whichthe worldwillfaceinthe coming decade 21st century
ECOLOGICALRISK
Climatechange
GrowthinCO2 emissions
Greatcontamination

GEOPOLITICAL RISKS
Weapons ofmass
Nationalizationofresources
Growthofcorruption

RISK
SOCIAL RISKS
Lackofdrinkingwater
Foodshortages
Pandemics andepidemics
Strengtheningnationalhatred

ECONOMIC RISK
The disintegrationofthe worldfinancial
system
Chronic fiscalimbalances
Unevenfood prices
The imbalance ofthe labourmarket
TECHNOLOGICAL RISK
CyberAttacks
Massdisinformation

So,thekey
challengestheworldwillfaceinthefutureare(un)willingnessoftheU.S.
andtheEUtosolveits
ownfinancialcrisis,theresolutionoftensions
intheAsia-Pacific
region,theIraniannuclear programandthewar inSyria.Inaddition,major threatsandrisks
are:the dissolutionof the presentworld financialsystem,deepeningthe gapbetweenrichand
poor,theextremevolatility
inenergyandfoodpricesandthespreadofweaponsofmass
destruction.
Conclusion
Thispaperoutlinesthemostimportantguidelinesinordertominimize
thefinancialcrisis,
whichsignificantly
strengthenedinthefuturestructureoftheglobalfinancial
systemand
improveitsfunctioning.Asalready
statedinthepaper,toagreaterextentinvolvesincreasing
thetransparency
ofinternationalfinancialrelations,strengtheningthebankingandfinancial
system of the national economy and promote greater private sector participation in the
financialsystem.Therefore,adirectresponsetotheglobalfinancialcrisis,they
wouldmake
thefollowingmeasures:providingliquidity
support,i.e.withafacilitationofthecentralbank
asthe"lenderoflastresort"
andareductionofthereserverequirement,expandingfinancial
safetynets,interventionsand"injection"ofcapitalinfinancialinstitutions,therestructuring
ofglobal financial institutions,measures to start lending.
The crisisalsorequires,andstablefinancialsystem,responsiblemonetarypolicy,regulate the
financial, especially banking sector, restore confidence in financial institutions and
modern financial instruments, as wellasresponsible fiscalpolicy. Significantriskisrelatedto
fiscalpolicy
(i.e.fiscalsustainability,thesustainabilityofexternaldebt).Intheopinionof
mostoftheworld'sexpertsthefinancialindustry crisisofthefinancial sectorwillcontinue until
16

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

the banks do nottighten up their capitalandnot lending to the economysignificantly.
References
CPU,(2009),Odgovorinaekonomskukrizuisrednjoroćneperspektive razvojauEUI BiH, CPU,
Sarajevo.
Dornbusch, R., (1999), After Asia: New directions for the international financialsystem.,
Journal of PolicyModelling, Vol. 21,Issue3, Belgium.
Dorn,J.,(2008),Internationalfinancialcrises:Whatroleforgovernment?,CATO Journal, Vol.
23, Issue1, New York.
FinancialServicesAuthority,(2009),Aregulatoryresponsetotheglobalbanking crisis, FSA,
FinancialServices Authority,London.
Financial Stability Forum, (2008), Report of the Financial Stability Forum on Enhancing
Market and
Institutional Resilience, Financial
StabilityForum,
Washington D.C.
Goodhart,
C.A.E.,(2008),Theregulatoryresponsetothefinancialcrisis,CESIFO
WPNo.225,Presentedat
Cesifoconferenceon«Financialmarketregulationin
Europe», Support by the WGL Leibniz association within the project “How to
construct Europe”,London.
http://www.dni.gov/index.php/about/organization/national-intelligence-council-globaltrendsNationalIntelligenceCouncilGlobalTrends,
January2013
http://www.poslovni.hr/svijet-i-regija/pad-financijskog-sustava-najveca-prijetnja226797, May2010
http://eu.commision.org,May2010
IMF, (2009), Lesson of the Global Crisis for Macroeconomic Policy, IMF, Washington
D.C.
Little,J.S.,Olivei,G.P.(1999),RethinkingtheInternationalMonetarySystem:An
New EnglandEconomicReview, Nov/Dec.,London.

Overview,

Ohmae,K.,(2007),Novaglobalnapozornica:izazoviiprilikeusvijetubezgranica,
Zagreb.

Mated.o.o.,

Ote, M., (2009), Slomdolazi, Romanov, Beograd.
Pilbeam,K.,(2006),InternationalFinance,ThirdEdition,PalgraveMacmillan,NewYork.

17

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Rargavajas,S.,(2009),Thefinancialsectorbailouts-sawingtheseedsofthenext
crisis,Financialmarkets,institution andinstruments, Vol. 18,Issue 2,New York
Reinhart,C,Roggof,K,(2009),Theaftermathoffinancialcrisis,NBERWP14656, Cambridge.
Reis,A.,Guilherme,J.,(2004),Internationalfinance:Meetingtheneedsofpeoplein
developingcountries, WP/16.,Policy IntegrationDepartment,WorldCommissionon
the SocialDimenzion on Globalization International Labour Office, Geneva.
Roubini,N.,(2008),TheCurrentU.S.RecessionandtheRisksofSystemicFinancial
Crisis,Written
TestimonyfortheHouse
ofRepresentatives'FinancialServices
Committee, Washington D.C
Samuelson,
P.,
(May2009),
Opasnosttek
2012.
Available:[http://www.nin.co.yu/misc/pretraga.php?txtKeyword=%D1%88%D1%
82%D0%B0+%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1]
Soros, G., (1998),Krizaglobalnog kapitalizma, Rabic, Sarajevo.
Stiglic,J. E., (2004), Protivrečnosti globalizacije, SMB-x, Beograd.
Zandi, M., (2010), Financijski šok, Met d.o.o., Zagreb.

18

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13173">
                <text>1615</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13174">
                <text>Global and State Policy and Modern Financial Crisis</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13175">
                <text>IBRELJIĆ, Izet
NUHANOVIĆ, Amra</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13176">
                <text>Lately dominates the impression that most holders of economic policies at  the national and global level are not willing to give up his rigorous attitude  and follow the recommendations on which there is scientific consensus is  evident. However, consistent with considerations of instructions that the  economics have been offered, would significantly reduce the frequency of  crises and the damage that they bring with them. Until today the variety of  conclusions are crystallized. Speaking of preventing financial crisis and its  practical implementation in the process of creating the optimal  macroeconomic policy is a priori highly desirable. So in the United States  adopted a plan that aims to redeem the State risky investment, while the  EU has a similar situation, because there are also carried out bank  recapitalization. Considering the above, the paper analysed and presented  the main activities undertaken on the road to recovery from the effects of  the global financial crisis, as well as the latest developments in the global  market, with special reference to the Euro zone.  Keywords: World Economic Policy, G-20, World Economic Crisis, Answers,  Challenges.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13177">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13178">
                <text>2013-05-10</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13179">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13180">
                <text>ISSN 978-9958-834-23-3     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1526" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2077">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/4ba12f7fbba889ebbd70917ff26382dc.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a00b3414ecf4ca3e1fbadcf64607aff7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="12304">
                    <text>International Conference on Economic and Social Studies, 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Global Crisis of 2008 and its Effects on an Emerging
Economy of Turkey’s Growth Process
Bilge Afşar
KTO Karatay University, Konya, Turkey
bilge.afsar@karatay.edu.tr
Birol Büyükdoğan
KTO Karatay University, Konya, Turkey
Hasan Gedik
KTO Karatay University, Konya, Turkey
By the year 1980 with a new world order began to take shape more clearly,
the crisis started to gain global feature. All economies involved in the
global system were forced to play the role given by the new order.
In this study, within the framework of this new order, effects of the last
global crisis of 2008, and the rising economy in Turkey will be discussed. At
the same time the course and speed of the effects of the crisis will be
revealed. The basis of the study which is enriched by the statistical studies
will be formed by self-effects as well as the taken and applied economic
decisions.
In the first section, the process after the national crisis that Turkey had
experienced since 2001 will be evaluated. It has been identified that
Turkey has shown a negative growth from 2002 to 2008. In 2009, Turkey
experienced strict contraction and began to recover in 2010. However,
experiencing the growth rate of 7.7% until 2009 has emerged as a
contradiction since the growth rate was 4.5% even in the 1950s. Today, if
this rate is not increased, convergence is inevitable, which is the focal point
of the study.
Another focal point of the study is, the next 10-year period in Turkey's
contribution to production due to the young population will peak of the
active population, and will develop a low risk banking system and the goal
of being the 10th greatest country by the year 2023.
In the case of what can be done to achieve that goal; Interest and inflation
will not increase but followed more loosely program than in the past,
maintenance of the external source input and the others.

61

�International Conference on Economic and Social Studies, 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

In addition, The SMEs, which are major determinant of the goal of
becoming the 10th greatest economy of the world, effects on the
economy, their more than 80% value added share in the world, since it is
30% in Turkey will be discussed in the part of the study.
At the same time, it is identified that SMEs which have contribution in
dealing with the crisis have experienced the following events in the global
financial crisis. For example SMEs; Tried to survive by reducing profit
margins and increasing their reputation by increasing advertisement
expenses.
Keywords: Global Crisis, Turkey, Emerging Economy, SME, Expansion

62

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2078">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/fc9ba36e1f09c2bd2eef6b0ba6d54b74.docx</src>
        <authentication>a4779490bee2cdc517021ae416c9a991</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="2079">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/95c5306cf13f890f5920aa4c49e12773.pdf</src>
        <authentication>465b0ce0c7e4d8febae1e4af488d6bba</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="12305">
                    <text>International Conference on EconomicandSocialStudies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

Global Crisis of 2008 and itsEffects on an EmergingEconomy of
Turkey’sGrowthProcess
Bilge Afşar
KTO Karatay University, Konya, Turkey
bilge.afsar@karatay.edu.tr
BirolBüyükdoğan
KTO Karatay University, Konya, Turkey
HasanGedik
KTO Karatay University, Konya, Turkey

Abstract
By the year 1980 with a new world order began to take shape more clearly, the crisis
started to gain global feature. All economies involved in the global system were forced
to play the role given by the new order. In this study, within the framework of this
new order, effects of the last global crisis of 2008, and the rising economy in Turkey
will be discussed. At the same time the course and speed of the effects of the crisis
will be revealed. The basis of the study which is enriched by the statistical studies will
be formed by self effects as well as the taken and applied economic decisions. In the
first section, the process after the national crisis that Turkey had experienced since
2001 will be evaluated. It has been identified that Turkey has shown a negative growth
from 2002 to 2008. In 2009, Turkey experienced strict contraction and began to
recover in 2010. However, experiencing the growth rate of 7.7% until 2009 has
emerged as a contradiction since the growth rate was 4.5% even in the 1950s. Today,
if this rate is not increased, convergence is inevitable, which is the focal point of the
study. Another focal point of the study is, the next 10-year period in Turkey's
contribution to production due to the young population will peak of the active
population, and will develop a low risk banking system and the goal of being the 10th
greatest country by the year 2023. In the case of what can be done to achieve that goal;
Interest and inflation will not increase but followed more loosely program than in the
past, maintenance of the external source input and the others.
Keywords: Global Crisis, Turkey, Emerging Economy, Expansion, Economics

Introduction
Turkey economy, particularly after 1980, as a result of both internal and external
dynamics, experiences numerous crises. These crises experienced made the growth,
qualified as increase in production capacity, unstable. This instability negatively affected
the national income per capita. When these crises of interest are combined with
political and economic negative developments, it is observed that the serious falls in
growth rate. With 2001 National Crisis is overcome, in the process ranging to
2008 Global Crisis, growth rate actualized over 5s%. The realizations in growth
directly affect the other areas of economy. The aim of this study is to discuss the
effects of 2008 Global Crisis, one of crises affecting Turkey, on growth process
of Turkey.

101

�International Conference on EconomicandSocialStudies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

The Concepts Economic Growth and Crisis
Growth, one of the oldest targets of societies (Soule and Antell, 2001: 327 ) and
expressed as increase in income, is measured by the increases in real Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) (Parasız, 2003: 10). Also, in order to be able the vicious circle of
poverty, it was considered as a necessary condition (Yılmaz and Akıncı, 2012). Growth
is analyzed via variations occurring from year to year. But, it is not reasonable to
assess the increase or decrease in growth with the figures of only one year. For
example, positive growth expresses the continuous and permanent increase in income
level, not an increase for one time (Ülgener, 1980: 408-412). Together with increase of
crises, the fruit of capitalism i.e. the disruptions in economic balance (Eğilmez, 2012:
167), growth was begun to be scrutinized not only quantitatively but
also
qualitatively. Thus, provided that the increase in growth rose the income per capita,
it was begun to be emphasized that it was reflected on the individual as development
and welfare. The welfare and development of the individual comes to our face as
final aim of growth. But, the crises interrupting the ordinary course damage to this
final aim. Togetherness of crisis and growth presents the answer of the question
“Why is growth desired in economic meaning?” more clearly so that growth targets
on the society and its development. The desired growth is the one that gives a
chance to save to the individual and society about future, distributes the increase in
welfare justly, encourage the human development making a contribution to the society,
and realize it (Berber, 2004: 6 ). Provided that the growth enabled all of these, the
dimension of development and welfare is proceeded. What already implied with
economic growth is the growth free from price increases i.e. real growth (Eğilmez,
2012: 38).
2008 Global Crisis And Growth Process of Turkey That Is
Economy

An Emerging

In the second half of the year 2008, the essence of crisis reaching global dimension is
the problems experienced in mortgage market in US (SusamveBakkal, 2008:73). Turkey
entering a serious recession period with crisis caught the stability via the fiscal and
monetary policies applied . But this stability was badly affected from the global crisis
unavoidably. This exposure made itself evident in especially in growth rate so that,
together with crisis, slowing occurred in the growth rates of both the developed
and developing countries, not only of Turkey. while the growth rate of world
economy was 5% in 2007, it fell to 3s% in 2009 (Susam and Bakkal, 2008: 77 ). While
Turkey recorded a growth of 1.1% in average between 1997 and 2001, this average
became 7.2% in average between 2002 – 2006 (Kesici, 2010: 12 ). Together with this
crisis, not only in Turkey but also all over the world, the values of national income,
employment, credit, and foreign trade experienced the greatest fall after 2 nd World War
(AydoğuĢ, 2009: 31 ). In Turkey economy, The growth that fell together with crisis
was followed by the regression in foreign trade and increase in budgetary deficit. In
response to these negativities, current deficit fell and interests regressed. The financial
sector damaging in the national crisis in 2001, with loosening the monetary and fiscal
policies and going to interest reduction (Eğilmez and Kumcu, 2011: 362), reached the
position of finding the real sector to be able to give credit. But, in the last crisis,
real sector was also damaged, so that as experienced in the year 2008, the most
important characteristic of economic system entering crisis and the symptom of crisis

102

�International Conference on EconomicandSocialStudies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

became mistrust prevailing in markets (User, 2009: 1). This also made itself evident
seriously in real sector.
The most important distinction of this crisis in terms of Turkey economy is that
chronic inflation was not experienced , when crisis set out and while it was
continuing (Akat, 2009: 21). Turkey entered the last crisis more strongly. The other
point is also that low inflation, low interest, and floating exchange rate is
simultaneously under consideration in economy. So, for the savers providing return
with high interest, the new and different period started (Akat, 2009: 27). According
to Çolak (2009), the recent global crisis collapsed supply oriented economic
policies becoming popular after 1990 and ended the institutional structuring formed with
these policies.That is government began to be effective again in economy.
Table 1: National Income Figures / Turkey (2000-2012)

Quarter

GDP
in
Development
current price
Rate (%)
(Million TL)

GDP
with
Development
constant price
Rate (%)
(Million TL)

1
2
3
4
Annualy
1
2
3
4
Annualy

289.905
317.392
351.173
339.243
1.297.713
326.880
346.340
376.419
364.177
1.416.817

26.383
28.083
31.177
29.533
115.174
27.257
28.895
31.667
29.935
117.753

12,4
9,3
8,7
5,3
8,8
3,3
2,9
1,6
1,4
2,2

2000
166.658
59,3
72.436
2001
240.224
44,1
68.309
2002
350.476
45,9
72.519
2003
454.780
29,8
76.338
2004
559.033
22,9
83.485
2005 Annualy 648.931
16,1
90.499
2006
758.390
16,9
96.738
2007
843.178
11,2
101.254
2008
950.534
12,7
101.921
2009
952.558
0,2
97.003
2010
1.098.799
15,4
115.174
Source: www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=13471

6,8
-5,7
6,2
5,3
9,4
8,4
6,9
4,7
0,7
-4,8
9,2

Year

2011

2012

20,3
19,3
18,6
14,7
18,1
12,8
10,1
7,2
7,4
9,2

103

�International Conference on EconomicandSocialStudies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

With current prices

With (constant prices (1998)

Populatio
Develop
Developme
Developmen
n in the
ment
Per Capita nt
t
Year middle of
Year
Rate
Rate
rate
year
'000
TL
%
$
%
TL
%
1998 62 464
1 124 4 338
1998
1 124 1999 63 364
1 651 46,9
3 907
-9,9
1999
1 071 -4,7
2000 64 252
2 594 57,1
4 130
5,7
2000
1 127 5,3
2001 65 133
3 688 42,2
3 021
-26,9
2001
1 049 -7,0
2002 66 008
5 310 44,0
3 492
15,6
2002
1 099 4,8
2003 66 873
6 801 28,1
4 559
30,6
2003
1 142 3,9
2004 67 723
8 255 21,4
5 764
26,4
2004
1 233 8,0
2005 68 566
9 464 14,7
7 022
21,8
2005
1 320 7,1
2006 69 395
10 929 15,5
7 586
8,0
2006
1 394 5,6
2007 70 215
12 009 9,9
9 240
21,8
2007
1 442 3,4
2008 71 095
13 370 11,3
10 438
13,0
2008
1 434 -0,6
2009 72 050
13.221 -1,1
8 559
-18,0
2009
1 346 -6,1
2010 73 003
15.051 13,8
10 022
17,1
2010
1 450 7,7
2011 73 950
17 549 16,6
10 466
4,4
2011
1 557 7,4
2012 74 855
18 927 7,9
10 504
0,4
2012
1 573 1,0
Source: www.tuik.gov.tr
Note: Population estimations are based on 2008 Address Based Population Registration
Turkey economy entered 2011 with a growth over that is predicted. In the first quarter
of the year 2011, GDP grew 12.4%. With this growth rate, Turkey economy
became one of the fastest growing economies of the world. Also in EU, Turkey
that is the fastest growing country maintained this title of it with the growth rate of
8.2% actualizing over the expectation in the third quarter . Turkey economy, with its
growth of 8.2% in third quarter, took place in the first rank among European and
OECD countries, and in world ranking, in the second rank as a county having the
most increase rate of GDP, following China. Turkey economy, with the effect of
delayed internal demand in the crisis period as well, experienced a strong and internal
demand induced growth process in the leadership of private sector in the years 2010 2011. In 2010, together with the expectation becoming better in the market, middle
termed polices and the trust to the political stability and fast input of capital, and
strongly financed investments provided economy to grow rapidly. Turkey economy,
despite the controlled slowing beginning in the second half of 2011, rose up the
pre-crisis level by 14.1%. The Turkey economy growing 8.8 % in average in 2011, with
this performance of it, took places among the fastest growing countries in the
world. In this period, the increase in the consumption and investment expenditures of
private sector became the driving force of especially internal demand induced
stimulation and significantly affected the growth. In this process, current deficit
reached the highest levels and distinction in the internal and external demand from
the aspect of expenditure became very remarkable. The most important contribution
to the growth of 8.5% in 2011 came from the internal demand with 10.2 points.
Since the saving levels is low, this growth, mostly financed with external
104

�International Conference on EconomicandSocialStudies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

resources, caused the rate of current deficit to GDP to rise to %10. This situation
leaded to some concerns about the sustainability of economic growth. In the first half
of 2011, while Turkey economy was growing based on internal demand, the external
demand negatively affected the growth. This situation varied along with the second
half of the year. With the effect of the measures taken to cool down the
economy, while rebalancing process was begun in internal and external demand,
the contribution of external demand to the growth gradually took a positive
appearance. Turkey economy beginning to slow in a balanced way, beginning from
the second half of 2011, orientated the path of soft landing, where one was in.
This process we called as soft landing is to balance the composition of growth
between internal and external demand and thus this is normalization of growth.
Table 3: Basic Indicators on World Economy (%)
World Growth
World Trade Volume

2008
2,8
3,0

2009
-0,6
-10,7

2010
5,1
12,6

2011
3,8
5,8

2012*
3,3
3,2

2013*
3,6
4,5

Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook Report, October 2012
Also in the 2012, the negative effects of global crisis on world economy continued,
despite the measures taken bad the tendency of slowing in country economies was
maintained. Although 5 years passed from global crisis to now, especially the
developed countries and Euro egion, many countries could not still solve their basic
macroeconomic and financial problems. Emerging countries, also including Turkey,
often depend on the capital coming from the developed countries and this
dependency can be viewed as a suicide agreement, when the things get worse i.e. in
the periods of crisis (Roubini, 2012: 139 ). As a matter of fact, the effect of the last
crisis was felt on the real sector of Turkey and caused the real sector to
become smaller (Çoban, 2012: 167). At the end of 2008, after worldwide crisis
becoming deeper with the bankrupt of Lehman Brothers, world economy showed a
strong improvement, but lost an acceleration again beginning from the second half
of 2011.
Conclusion
Also before 2011, Turkey that could not catch a stable growth trend, along with
2008 Global Crisis, experienced a fall in its growth rate from time to time. The
high growth experienced in the first quarter of 2008 was mostly resulted from the
increase in internal demand. Beginning from the second quarter of 2008, the fall
in growth rate began in the growth ratezs and in respect with third quarter, the
effects of international crisis were thoroughly begun to be felt. Depending on
becoming of crisis deeper, the growth rate continued to fall. In addition:
1. The last crisis is viewed as the mother of all monetary crises
2. Political stability, structural reforms, and macroeconomic stability make positive
contribution to the growth rates.
3. Diplomacy and economic activities going toward from multi - polarity to
single polarity affected every kind of institutes and thee rules, supposed not be
changed, began to change. While the power balances was reestablished,
acquiring maximum share will be the best result. What appears from here is
that Federal Reserve Bank did not intervene and raise the interests in
American economy growing and experiencing energy outbreak in the years

105

�International Conference on EconomicandSocialStudies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

before the last crisis, even if on the purpose of preventing inflation in
American economy. As a result of all of these, the depression economy
returned.
4. Crisis affected all areas in the world. Along with the global crisis
experienced some paradigms determining the world and Turkey economy
collapsed. This collapse is also the predictor of new formation after crisis.
For example, China economy is expected to reach a growth of $ 30 trillion
in 2040. When considering the effect of China, it will not be wrong to say
that new economic order will pass to labor intensive system again.The labor–
intensive strategy here implies brain power, not the muscle force. That is,
the essence of creating economic value any longer became knowledge
5. At the point, where global crisis turned into global crisis, and deeply
affected the real sector, crisis became a debt crisis. At the moment, EU
countries are experiencing the best example of this situation . While Europe is
experiencing crisis, that Asian countries are growing gives an opinion to
us about the new system and new world. Economic dynamic is rapidly
shifting toward Asia.

References
AKAT, A, S, (2009). “YeniDönemiAnlamak”, TekstilĠĢverenDergisi, Vol: 348, Page:
26-28, Ġstanbul.
AYDOĞUġ, O, (2009). “2008-2009 (?) KüreselKrizdenGeçerkenTürkiyeEkonomisi
ÜzerineBazıGözlemveDeğerlendirmeler”, TürkAkademi, Vol: 4 (ÖzelSayı II), Page: 2749, Ġstanbul.
BERBER, M, (2004). İktisadiBüyümeveKalkınma, DeryaKitabevi, 2.Baskı, Trabzon.
ÇOBAN,Y, (2012). TürkiyeEkonomisi, ĠkinciSayfaYayınları, Ġstanbul.
ÇOLAK, Ö, F, (2009). “2008 Krizinin 1929 KriziileBenzerlikleriÜzerineBirAnaliz”,
TĠSK Akademi, Vol: 4 (ÖzelSayı II), Page: 51-69, Ġstanbul.
EĞĠLMEZ, M, (2012). KolayEkonomi, RemziKitabevi, 2. Baskı, Ġstanbul.
EĞĠLMEZ, M, KUMCU, E, (2011). EkonomiPolitikası-TeoriveTürkiyeUygulaması,
RemziKitabevi, 11. Baskı, Ġstanbul.
KESĠCĠ, M, (2010). “TürkiyeEkonomisininYüksekBüyümeEvresindeĠstihdamve
ĠĢsizlik”, ĠĢ, GüçEndüstriĠliĢkileriveĠnsanKaynaklarıDergisi, Vol: 12, Num:3, Page:7-26,
ISSN: 1303-2860, Temmuz, Ġstanbul.
PARASIZ, Ġ, (2003).EkonomikBüyümeTeorileri-DinamikMakroEkonomiyeGeçiş,
EzgiKitabeviYayınları, 2. Baskı, Bursa.
ROUBINI, N, (2012). KrizEkonomisi-DünyaEkonomisininÇöküşüveGeleceği, Çev:
IĢılTezcan, Pegasus Yayınları, Ġstanbul.

106

�International Conference on EconomicandSocialStudies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo

SOULE, G, ANTELL, G, (2001). HerkesiçinEkonomi, Çev: NejatMuallimoğlu, Avcıol
Basım, 4.Baskı, Ġstanbul.
SUSAM, N, BAKKAL, U, (2008).“KrizSüreciMakroDeğiĢkenlerive 2009 Bütçe
BüyüklükleriniNasılEtkileyecek?”,MaliyeDergisi, Vol:155, Page: 72-88, Temmuz-Aralık,
Ġstanbul.
User, Erol (2009).EtikEkonomi (1. Baskı), CiniusYayınları, Ġstanbul.
ÜLGENER, S, (1980). MilliGelir, İstihdamveİktisadiBüyüme, Der Yayınevi, 6.
Baskı, Ġstanbul.
YILMAZ, Ö, AKINCI, M, (2012). İktisadiBüyümeveMakroekonomikBelirleyicileri,
Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
www.imf.org, World Economic Outlook Report, October 2012
www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=13471

107

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12296">
                <text>1493</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12297">
                <text>Global Crisis of 2008 and its Effects on an Emerging  Economy of Turkey’s Growth Process</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12298">
                <text>AFSAR, Bilge
BUYUKDOGAN, Birol
GEDIK, Hasan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12299">
                <text>By the year 1980 with a new world order began to take shape more clearly,  the crisis started to gain global feature. All economies involved in the  global system were forced to play the role given by the new order.  In this study, within the framework of this new order, effects of the last  global crisis of 2008, and the rising economy in Turkey will be discussed. At  the same time the course and speed of the effects of the crisis will be  revealed. The basis of the study which is enriched by the statistical studies  will be formed by self-effects as well as the taken and applied economic  decisions.  In the first section, the process after the national crisis that Turkey had  experienced since 2001 will be evaluated. It has been identified that  Turkey has shown a negative growth from 2002 to 2008. In 2009, Turkey  experienced strict contraction and began to recover in 2010. However,  experiencing the growth rate of 7.7% until 2009 has emerged as a  contradiction since the growth rate was 4.5% even in the 1950s. Today, if  this rate is not increased, convergence is inevitable, which is the focal point  of the study.  Another focal point of the study is, the next 10-year period in Turkey's  contribution to production due to the young population will peak of the  active population, and will develop a low risk banking system and the goal  of being the 10th greatest country by the year 2023.  In the case of what can be done to achieve that goal; Interest and inflation  will not increase but followed more loosely program than in the past,  maintenance of the external source input and the others. In addition, The SMEs, which are major determinant of the goal of  becoming the 10th greatest economy of the world, effects on the  economy, their more than 80% value added share in the world, since it is  30% in Turkey will be discussed in the part of the study.  At the same time, it is identified that SMEs which have contribution in  dealing with the crisis have experienced the following events in the global  financial crisis. For example SMEs; Tried to survive by reducing profit  margins and increasing their reputation by increasing advertisement  expenses.  Keywords: Global Crisis, Turkey, Emerging Economy, SME, Expansion</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12300">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12301">
                <text>2013-05-10</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12302">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12303">
                <text>ISSN 978-9958-834-23-3     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3374" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4166">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/bf747f13a79dcf657d81abb3609bbb8b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ccd3e67783f49cb9edf01b154dec15d0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="25803">
                    <text>1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Global Crisis: Consequences and Solution Possibilities
Arif YAVUZ
Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, Turkey
dr.arif @ turk.net
Abstract: In this paper, the reasons and solutions of the 2008 global economic crisis are
discussed. In the first part, a comparision of 2008 global crisis with 1929 economic crisis, the
effects of each and also the differences are explained. The champions and the losers of the
current crisis are interpretted. Also, the estimated duration and the expected end time of the
crisis are discussed. In the second part, the effects of the crisis to the Global Economy and to
some of the countries are stated. The expected effects can be summarised as, “losing of
confidence in global market”, “having negative prospects”, “decreasing of the foreign trade”,
“shrinking of the national incomes” ,“shrinking of demand and consumption”, “increasing of
unemployment”. In the last part, some solutions for negative effects of global crisis are
offered. A world economic story is stated and suggested a new International Money Currency.
Restrictions for the virtual Money is recommended and also some new rules on international
trade and international finance system are offered.
Keywords: global economic crisis, effects of 2008 global crisis, 2008 global crisis, solutions
of 2008 crisis

Definition and Reasons for The Global Crisis
This conference paper has three parts: how does global crisis arise and what conditions do it develop
until today. Second, it will be discussed consequences of global crisis. Lastly, solution possibilities will be
offered for global crisis.
1 –Is the 2008 Crisis, a global or local one?
To understand how global crisis arises, first, we should comprehend is the crisis global or local? In light
of information in the last 3-4 months it is possible to say that the crisis we are living is a global one. This crisis is
diffferent then that of the 2001 and 1994 Turkish, 1996 Asian and 2000 Latin American crisis. These crisis were
regional. The crisis we live in today is global, that is it affects the whole world.
2– A comparison of the 2008 and 1929 world crisis
If we think about the 1929 crisis, it was the first world wide crisis. The crisis of today, unfortunately,
could be considered a second world crisis. Since 200-300 hundred years ago or in the 1700’s, society was
agricultural, and there was no possibility of the creation of global crisis. Because what we know today as being
factory production and means of transportation did not exist then. Society solely existed on the sustinance of
their agricultural means. However, by the end of the 1700’s and the beginning of the 1800’s with the
introduction of the industrial era, with the invention of the Steam machine by James Watt, there arose a drastic
structural change in society.
Society began to evolve from agricultural to industrial. At the same time, economic points of view were
also beginning to move to a more Classical economic perspective. In a liberal economy Classical economists
advised that “people should be, and people should pass”. This was based on the famous idea of the invisible
hand. Or that economy, inevitably, has the mechanisms to adjust itself, and that any type of intervention would
ultimately destroy this mechanisms function.
As a result the commencement of mass production and the industrial revolution lead to the typic
standard of factories producing as much product as possible because the same economists thought that “every
supply created its own demand”. This development and thought came from England. In turn, this idea also
passed to Europe and America. However, this theory did not develop as Classic Economists had desired.
Due to mass production in factories a substantial amount of stock piled up and as a result many factories
were forced into bankruptcy. This was the main reason for the 1929 crisis. In short, the 1929 crisis was industry
based, the cause of mass production and insufficient demand. In this period the crisis caused in the industrial
sector resulted in a crisis in the financial sector. Bankrupt factory shares had lost their value in the stock
exchange. The reason for this was the parallel processing of an industrial and a financial deficit. The profit from

251

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

production made during the Industrial deficit was used to pay for for the principal and interest in the of loans in
the financial system.
There was a break down of economic claims in the frame of the 1929 crisis’s general economic offers
and claims regulations. There needed to a balance in supply and demand. The drastic and sudden imbalance of
this system was the cause of the crisis.
In order to understand the type of crisis we are in today we need to understand the structure of our
society. Although today, many countries are recognized as being industrial, America and Europe are no longer
considered as such but are refered to as technological societies. Since America and Europe are the culprits of
today’s crisis we need to further explore their infrastructures.
America and Europe have completed an industrial period and as a post industrial society have
progressed to an information or technological population. As a result America’s financial crisis has influenced
related societies. Therefore, information regarding America’s financial market directly influences the markets of
countries like England and France. Thus, the crisis of today is not an industrial but a financial crisis.
This crisis, using the fundamentals of finance, still maintains the imbalance of supply and demand.
Because money as a fundamental by-product of finance has caused the instability of this supply and demand
relationship. More specifically either there has been a high or low demand of money. There has been
contradictory points of view on this topic. Some experts in this area claim that the crisis is caused by the
abundance of money while others claim it is a result of a scarcity of money. According to our opinion this crisis
has been the result of the abandunce of monetary funds.
3 – Has the 1929 Crisis been more influential than the one of 2008?
When compared to the 1929 crisis, it could be said that the one of today is significantly more influential
because globalization is much more wide spread. The ending of the 1929 crisis, took approximately 4-5 years.
The crisis of today, because it is so major and wide spread, will be much more influential than the one of 1929.
4 – Causes of the 2008 Crisis
The crisis of today is caused by the wealth of money. Thus a wealth of money does not necessarily
translate into a wealth of physical money but a great quantity of virtual money.
4.1- A Story of a World Economy
This topic could be further explored in the form of an exemplary story: lets imagine that ten people live
on a planet. These ten people each offer a service or product. On of them labours in agriculture or grows and
sells fruit and vegetables. The second person labours in the production of raising animals for the sale of milk,
meat and cheese. Another is responsible for the production of textiles. Yet another produces vehicles and another
for the construction and sale of homes and buildings.
In short, all, except the tenth person, is responsible for the production of some goods or service. The
tenth person produces nothing. This person has a machine, and when he presses buttons on this machine he
produces a product stamped on paper used for exchange purposes. When he gives this paper to the car maker he
gets a car. When he gives some of this paper to the agriculturist or the grower of fruit and vegetables, he gets
produce. These nine people with the paper they have recieved use it amongst themselves to exchange their
products. This story could directly relate to the situation of today. This story is called “Ekmel Theory”. The
pressing of money must be based on some regulation as it was before. However, in 1971 with the abolish of the
Bretton- Woods system everything had changed.
4.2- The 1944 Bretton Woods System
In 1944, there was a small town in the US named Bretton Woods. An international money system was
accepted there. According to this system the US was pressed money depending on the US gold reserves. In this
system, 1 ounce of gold was equal to $35 or 1 US dollar was equal to 0,88867 grams of gold. International trade
was handled by the US dollar that was pressed depending on gold reserves of the US. If there was demand on
gold the US would provide it. This system was active in 1944, however, in 1971 was abolished. Today, there is
no requirement for the US to press money depending on gold reserves. The system was basically abolished
because of the dependance on gold reserves and press money was blocking the development of world economies
and international trade. Thus, this rule was cancelled. Any country could press any amount money, however,
international trade did not have the same acceptability or values. Today, there are two accepted money
currencies: the Euro and the American Dollar. Other country currencies are not valid in purchasing goods or
services in international trade (Seyidoğlu, 2003).

252

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

4.3- Industrial or Financial, an Abundance or Shortage of Money?
Our global crisis is a financial wealth of money crisis. There exists groups who control or own the
world financial market. These groups are wide spread in America and Europe and could be called the proprietors
of globalization. The proprietors of globalization, although in reality consisting of many groups, could be
categorized into two factual groups. The proprietors of globalziation played with all their worldly assets and then
exerted these valued assets beyond all highest expectation.
4.4- All assets were played with as if in the stock exchange and within 5-6 years their values increased 2-6
Fold
Since Stock shares represent the value of a company, a company must increase its “real” value.
Although sometimes the increase in value of stocks is not dependant on “real” gains. This type of increase is a
speculative one. A company, for example, with a realistic growth of 10% to 30% could hold stocks that represent
the company may have increased in value five fold. The same type of specualtions have been made in stocks of
petroleum, iron, and copper. For example, a barrel of petroleum within 5-6 years (2003-2008) has increased from
25 US$ to 150 US$ (Đncekara, 2009). In the same time a ton of iron has increased from 300 US$ to 1500 US$. A
ton of copper has increased from 25 US$ to 150 US$ (Tuduk, 2008).
In the same manner real estate property value in the US has risen from 8 trillion US$ to 20 trillion US$
(Tarhan,2008). If these prices had risen in terms of an inflation it should only increase 30-40% because in
European countries inflation rates could be 2-4%, in America 3-4% and other developed countries are observed
at a steady 5%. Within 5-6 years of this type of inflation a 30% increase would be the possible outcome. In light
of this information petroleum, copper and iron or real estate do not reflect true gains. However, these abnormal
gains were not problematic in those days.
4.5- Instruments of derivatives: Two to the third = 2 x 2 x 2 = 8
Two to the fifth = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 32
The aforementioned abnormal increase rates has not been with actual currencies but with virtual money.
As a result, these gains have been a devlopment based on derivative instruments. As known the derivative
instrument is a financial instrument that does not increase money volume arithmetically but geometrically. This
instrument frequently used in America has commenced and caused the wide spread global financial crisis
because these instruments (generally used in corporate equity and mortgage based documents)are sold and
bought in the global financial pool. These instruments have been observed in the large financial market
transactions of investment corporations, hedge funds, and retirement funds. However, the development of the
basis of the instrument, or real value, has been observed to be significantly different than the instrument itself.
For example, a home built with a mortgage of 100,000 US$ has lost its relationship with the application of the
instrument, the paperwork that represents the 100,000 US$ home has risen to 300,000 US$ with the buy and sell
procedures within the financial sector.
International accreditors like Fitch, Moodies, and S&amp;P exist to evaluate the aforementioned procedures
within markets and their pools. These accreditor firms have noted investments with AA and AAA scores. This
way, investments have been known to increase. Also, insurance companies like AIG have been known to insure
these investments and instruments. This way the return of money is also insured. Another important issue is the
lack of audit or inspection. As a result the crisis of today has arised within the loss of real instrumental value and
the existence of accreditor and insurance companies.
4.6 - The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933
The Glass-Steagall Act was enacted in 1933 USA. With the act came the prohibition of bank
transactions within the stock exchange and the use of derivative instruments. However, it’s interesting that this
act was dismissed in 1999 and banks were permitted to transact within the stock exchange and were allowed to
issue derivative instruments (Yıldıray, 2009) .
The crisis of today commenced with the Lehmann Brothers’ September 2007 claim to bankruptcy. The
announcement of the Lehmann Brothers’ bankruptcy, exclaimed exageration, and was the symbol of a company
that went through and failed in an unreal market. After the Lehmann Brothers many investment
companies,insurance companies and corporation giants like GM were left in difficult situations. For example, in
a short time, the value of GM went down from 20 billion US dolars to just 1,8 billion US (Anatolia Agency,
2008).

253

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

For this reason, the crisis of today, is not just a mortgage or investment crisis, but in general a financial
crisis that is affecting the globe. For example, the Foreign Minister of Quwait, in the recent past, has claimed the
loss of 2.5 trillion US dolars in Gulf countries (i.e. Quwait, Dubai, and Katar) exemplifying the magnitude of the
dimensions and spread of the crisis.
5 – Champions and Losers of the Crisis (4 Groups)
Another valuable question, whether or not this crisis arose on its own or if it was knowledgably
controlled? And who are the champions or losers in this crisis? There are three possibilities. The first, is if the
crisis has arisen on its own in an uncontrolled environment? Then the global market has lost as a whole. The
second, the crisis was under control and one of the aforementioned markets won and the other lost, respectively.
The third possibility is that the crisis was controlled and both markets prospered.
In this crisis the winners and losers could go into two groups. The first champions are the ones who
franchised the money press because with the fall of the financial markets came the weakness of the real sector,
the industrial and service sector and other real assests. For example, petroleum at a rate of 150 US$ quickly
falling to 40 US$ stands at a currency rate of 55 US$. At the same rate, a Turkish home valued at 500,000 TL
has fallen to 250,000 TL. For this reason, those who own a money press could benefit from worldly assets, and
can take advantage of offers when costs go down. The second group of winners are those who own a vault and a
desk or those who still use cash. All asset prices fall and when the once valued 20 billion US GM falls to 1,8
billion US, it becomes possible to own.
The first of the losers are factory, corporation, and holding owners. Their losses are in proportion to
their business. In other words, big corporation owners’ losses are greater than those of smaller corporations. For
example, Forbis’s World’s richest people list consisting of Husnu Ozyegin, a rich Turkish Businessman, was no
coincident. Because right before the crisis he was the owner of Finans Bank. Just before the crisis he sold it for
2.7 million US dolars and while he held the money, fresh in his hands, the crisis began. The second group of
losers are those who hold investments. Those who hold shares in American government, corporation or
investment bank stocks would be considered disadvantaged since it is unknown what or whether or not they will
pay or get paid.
6 – What is the duration of the Crisis? Has it hit rock bottom ?
How long the crisis will last and when it will hit rock bottom are important questions to ask. It will end
eventually. When it has hit rock bottom it could bounce back in three ways. Either in a V- shape, a U- shape or a
W- shape with the later two possibilities it could end for good. Three possibilities are in question. The first
option, if the two global market actors have won and they are in gain (have profit), the crisis will last 1-2 years,
hit rock bottom in 2009 and bounce back in a V-shape. The second possibility, if the two global market actors,
one winning and the other losing, the crisis will last 3-4 years hitting rock bottom in 2009-2010 and will come
back in a U-shape. The third option, is if the global market actors are both in the red then the crisis could last 510 years hit rock bottom in 2015 return in a W-shape and possibly cause war.
The world by the end of 2007 and in Turkey since October of 2008 has recorded global economic
information on a a daily basis. With this information we have composed a global crisis journal. If we were to
look at this journal we would see that upto mid April of 2009 we have recieved only negative news reports.
However, with the bad news upto mid April we have recieved few but good reports after this date. In our
opinion, not only in Turkey but in the world the crisis has not ended but has come closer. The bottom of the well
and the end of the tunnel are visible. With positive good news, alongside the wide spread (bad) news like the
bankruptcy of corporations, joining of corporations, and the sale of corporations, we will hit the bottom of the
crisis.

254

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Shape V

1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Figure 1: Shape V

Shape U
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Figure 2: Shape U

255

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Shape W
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Figure 3: Shape W

Consequences of the Crisis
1- Security Problems in the Market
The first consequence of the crisis is the issue of security and trust. With the initiation of the crisis the
entire world suffers from a lack of trust and security. At the moment individuals have a difficult time trusting
each other. For example, banks have no trust corporations they do not give out loans. In the same frame no one
relies on checks. People do not trust each other. As a result trust in global terms is at a loss.
2- Negative expectations
The second consequence of the crisis is the negative affect on expectations. Individuals choice to not
consume products has a negative effect on the economy. As a result prices of goods have gone down. Moreover,
it may be said that we could be faced with a deflation.
3 – Consequences around the globe
The third consequence could arise among countries. Developed countires are foreseen to be more
influenced in comparison to developing or non-developed countries. For example, the US, the UK, France, and
Germany, will be the most influenced countries while Turkey is seen as a country that will be less affected by the
crisis. Thus, Nigeria, Sudan and similar countries will be less influenced. The reason behind this is that their
integration in the world economy is less, compared to the others.
The fourth consequence of the crisis is in countries where export is more than imported products which
would have a negative effect on the economy. Countries where export is greater than import will suffer with the
weakening of global trade. For example, countries like Japan, China, and Germany. The most disadvantaged are
especially Japan and China where their economies are dependant on export. Another effect of the crisis is in
regard to global national profit of 60 trillion US$ has decreased to 30-40 trillion US$.
4 – Effects on Turkey
Because this global financial crisis has its roots in America and Europe the arise of the crisis in our
country should not be the fault of the governement. The responsibility of our government takes place after the
fact. In other words, the government has the responsibility to take care while in crisis. As a result, our
government is not at blame for the crisis however, if the crisis has had negative effects the government should be
questioned. If there are consequences and negative outcomes as a result of the crisis then the government should
be held responsible and could it could be said that they were not capable of directing the country.
This crisis is considered to be a world financial crisis. When global financial sectors crash, banks and
then industrial sectors begin to go bankrupt. This situation did in not take place in Turkey but has taken on an

256

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

interesting twist. In Turkey no bank goes bankrupt, but in 2008 every bank has made a profit and to say that that
there is a financial crisis would be false. However, there is an industrial and real sector crisis. In comparison to
the world crisis, Turkey’s prosperous financial sector demonstrates an awkward turn of events in the industrial
and real sectors.
The reason for this is financial cuts and the existence of foreign banks not giving loans. As a result the
prime minister stated that the crisis would be mild over the country and not allow it to break down, but the crisis
has more than skimmed over the industrial sector. The difference between the world crisis and the one in Turkey
is based on the holding of funds from the financial to the industrial and business sectors. However, because the
industrial sector has lost profit and unemployment has gone up the financial sector will soon negatively be
affected as well.
The low flexibility of essential products such as bread and rice will not be much affected by the crisis.
However, sectors that produce furniture, computers, and automobiles, products with high flexibility, will be
influenced. To say that the crisis will be mild in the industrial and business sectors is an over statement.
The high quantity of foreign banks in Turkey is the internal cause of our crisis. Moreover, the 2001
crisis, in terms of Turkish banking systems, had positive outcomes. However, because of the abnormal number
of foreign banks in Turkey, a normally disadvantageous crisis has become much more.

Solution Suggestions
Solution suggestions could be grouped into 3:
1. what the world needs to do
2. what Turkey needs to do,
3. what corporations need to do,
1- What the world should do
I would like to tell a economic story. First we should accept that the crisis arised because of fictional
money concept, not real cash money. Therefore, fictional money should be eliminated. The USA achieved that in
1933 and 1934 with precautionary measures. However, in 1999, to produce virtual money those precautionary
measures legal acts abolished, thus the crisis was unavoidable. For this reason the development of virtual money
and ties to derivative instruments have been forbidden. Another problematic point is that the world trade is done
in Euros and US funds. The use of specific currencies gives those countries undeserved distinction and authority.
For example, America can press its own currency as it wishes and in return buy goods and services from the
whole world. In the same way, those countries involved in world trade prefer to use US dolars.
For this reason, the system is rotten and has been observed to fail. Therefore, a central world bank
should be established or the United Nations should establish a currency that can be used worldwide.
In other words, there should be an international currency used worldwide. For this to be realized, every
country’s contribution to the world national profit should be considered. For example, the contribution of the US
to the world national profit is 14 trillion US. Turkey’s contribution is 700 million US. Every country does not
contribute equally the currency profit is based on an individual basis. Thus, the whole world’s contribution and
control over one currency would provide a trustworthy monetary system, thus, soon there will be more insight
into this area. There is postive feedback on this topic. For example, the most recent G-20 meeting in Russia
claimed such an offer. In the same concern, China also made similar requests. The first commentary on these
requests was made by the US because it would be hazardous to its own wealth.
2-What Turkey Should Do
In summary Turkey should use precautionary measures. The ending of the crisis should be foreseen. To
reach this goal, consumption must be re-originated because of the reduced demand caused by unemployment and
negative expectations. Reduced consumption and demand causes no sales or production by factories. Therefore,
they dismiss employees. Unemployed individuals induce a reduction on consumption and demand. This is a
vicious circle that should be eliminated. The worldwide economy gets diminished. Economic graphs demonstrate
a decrease of profits. Urgently, Turkey should take precautionary measures. Turkey should convert its own
economic graphics into a V or U-shape.
Turkey must be one of the first countries that should do this. There are three steps; first, the crisis has
ended the campaign by the media. It must furnish a secure enviroment and positive expectations into markets.
Due to negative expectations those who have money do not spend it.
The second is to increase the money supply. It has to be handled with foreign funds or with the pressing
of money by a central bank. With the increase of money supply, real sector must be supported. This will increase
production and investment. Moreover, an increase of money supply would increase demand and consumption.

257

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

A third step is for the government to cut taxes and make compulsory levy cuts or payment should be
delayed. Consequently, money will still be in the market, indirectly, and the money supply will increase. Here
we should be careful about liquid deficit. If, there is no secure environment and positive expectations in markets,
liquid afflux will cause deficiency. If liquidity increases through foreign funds, the Turkish Lira will gain value.
With the central bank pressing money inflation will arise.
To eliminate these risks, national products should be produced and consumed. In other words, importance should
be given to national goods and industry not foreign goods. How we are going to do that.
3- What Corporations Should Do
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

They have to guess the rock botoom of the crisis. And they have to rearrange their budgets.
Their budgets should be based on a six month period not one year.
They have to reduce credit loans. They have to give more importance to their equity capital. It means
they could be lessen.
They have to produce and sell products that are in demand and whose flexibility is less than others.
Expenses should be reduced in a quick manner because earnings and revenue will decrease.
They have to find new customers and markets.
They have to organize campaigns in order to increase demands and consumption of consumers.
They have to increase efficiency of the work place and labour forces.
Functional flexibility should be increased.

References:
Anatolia Agency. (11 Kasım 2008).
Đncekara, A. (2009). Küresel Kriz ve Türkiye Ekonomisi. Đstanbul.
Seyidoğlu, H. (2003). Uluslar arası Đktisat. Gizem Can Yayınları, Đstanbul.
Tahran, V. (2008). Global Kriz ve Türkiye. Tisk Sosyal Politika Toplantıları, Đstanbul, 5 Kasım 2008.
Tuduk, M. ( 2008). Referans Gazetesi, 12 Aralık 2008.
Yıldıray Y. (2009). Mortgage Krizi. Đstanbul.

258

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25797">
                <text>212</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25798">
                <text>Global Crisis: Consequences and Solution Possibilities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25799">
                <text>YAVUZ, Arif</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25800">
                <text>In this paper, the reasons and solutions of the 2008 global economic crisis are  discussed. In the first part, a comparision of 2008 global crisis with 1929 economic crisis, the  effects of each and also the differences are explained. The champions and the losers of the  current crisis are interpretted. Also, the estimated duration and the expected end time of the  crisis are discussed. In the second part, the effects of the crisis to the Global Economy and to  some of the countries are stated. The expected effects can be summarised as, “losing of  confidence in global market”, “having negative prospects”, “decreasing of the foreign trade”,  “shrinking of the national incomes” ,“shrinking of demand and consumption”, “increasing of  unemployment”. In the last part, some solutions for negative effects of global crisis are  offered. A world economic story is stated and suggested a new International Money Currency.  Restrictions for the virtual Money is recommended and also some new rules on international  trade and international finance system are offered.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25801">
                <text>2009-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25802">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>HB Economic Theory</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3219" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3999">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/cd44c60f3dbc6a2c158988dc8c230eb6.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9670d1e52d0115a25dd9da820582dde9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="24722">
                    <text>1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Global Financial Crisis and Economic Sustainability in South East Europe
Nurdan ASLAN
Department of Economics, University of Marmara, Turkey
nuraslan@marmara.edu.tr
Nuray TERZI
Department of Economics, University of Marmara, Turkey
nurayterzi@marmara.edu.tr

Abstract: The global financial system has witnessed rapid growth and substantial
structural change during the last ten years leading to globalization of financial markets.
The integration of financial markets has accentuated the rapid flow of capital across
borders as well as magnified the contagious effects of financial crisis with wide
implications for transmission of financial policies on the domestic economy and
internationally. The global financial crisis has become a major international event and has
spread to developing countries through trade linkages, a reduction of FDI and remittances,
and a collapse in commodity prices. The effect of the global financial crisis was worsened
by rising global energy prices which pushed up inflation. The global financial crisis has
evolved differently from other major crises that have hit the developing world. This paper
analyzes the economic sustainability in South East Europe against global financial crisis.
Keywords: global financial crisis, economic sustainability

Introduction
From 2002 until the end of 2007 world economic growth averaged 4.5 per cent per annum compared to
3 per cent in the 1990s. Growth has been particularly strong and broad-based in the developing world, reaching
some 7.5 per cent, twice the rate of the 1990s. Real commodity prices rose to levels not seen since the 1970s
and developing countries as a whole started to run trade surpluses with advanced countries private capital flows
to developing countries recovered strongly and spreads on emerging-market debt fell to historical lows. Price
stability in the developing world has been unprecedented for many decades, with single-digit inflation rates
being the rule rather than the exception (Akyuz, 2008).
As a result of continued deregulation of financial markets and further opening of national borders to
international capital flows, economic activity in both advanced and developing countries has come to be
increasingly shaped by financial factors. Low interest rates in some other advanced countries, notably in Japan,
encouraged cross-currency flows towards countries with higher interest rates, including in the form of highly
leveraged carry trades. The very same factors have played a major role in the strong recovery of capital flows to
emerging markets, contributing to currency appreciations, asset bubbles and credit expansion, and stimulating
spending and growth in the recipient countries (Akyuz, 2008).
In recent decades, world trade has shown two important characteristics. First of all, it has tended to
expand more rapidly than world production, a process that has been accompanied 2008 by a rapid
diversification in the trade structure. Thus, during the recent boom, in 2003-2006, world trade grew at an annual
rate of 9.3%, more than twice the rate of growth of world output (3.8%). Second, these rates of growth have
been highly elastic to world output through the business cycle and have, therefore, been more volatile than
world production (UNDP, 2009).
These conditions have been replaced since mid-2008, particularly since September 2008, by the effects
of financial turmoil that erupted in mid-2007 in the U.S. which has now become the worst global financial crisis
and the worst recession since the Great Depression (UNDP, 2009). This financial crisis quickly spread to
emerging market and developing economies. Investors have pulled capital from countries, even those with small
levels of perceived risk, and caused values of stocks and domestic currencies to plunge. Also, slumping exports
and commodity prices have added to the woes, pushing economies world wide either into recession or into a
period of slow economic growth (Nanto, 2009).
The current financial crisis has imposed a heavy economic burden on many countries and significantly
increased the incidence of poverty and vulnerability. This paper analyzes the economic sustainability in South
East Europe against global financial crisis. The following section gives the channels of transmission of the crisis

10

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

to developing countries. Third section presents the economic conditions in South East Europe economies. Last
section provides a conclusion.

The Channels of Transmission of the Crisis to Developing Countries
The current economic and financial crisis was driven by the reversal of the three positive shocks that
developing countries experienced during the recent boom period: exceptional financing, high commodity prices
and large flows of remittances. The initial trigger that contributed to the reversals of these trends was the impact
of the bursting of the U.S. housing bubble. The emerging recession in the United States and other developed
countries further multiplied the negative impact of the crisis for developing countries (UNDP, 2009).
The one of the main channel of transmission of the crisis to exporters of manufactures and services is a
decline in trade volumes and exporters of primary goods can be affected by declining prices. Falling energy
prices can benefit energy importing countries but they can also lead to reduced investment and economic
activity in commodity-dependent developing countries (UNDP, 2009).
The deterioration in financing conditions has been most severe for countries with large current account
deficits. These countries showed signs of overheating and unsustainably rapid credit growth prior to the
intensification of the financial crisis. About half of all developing countries have been running current account
deficits of 5 percent of GDP or more, and in some cases the deficits are around 10 percent. Developing
countries will be highly vulnerable to swings in various sources in external financing in coming years
(Lin,2008).
The second channel for transmission of the crisis from developed to developing countries is via capital
flows. The effects take place both through volumes and associated costs of such flows (UNDP, 2009).
According to World Bank, private capital flows to developing countries are likely to fall significantly in 2009,
led by pull-backs in portfolio flows and international bank lending. Large portfolio and foreign bank lending
flows have contributed to rapid growth in credit to the private sector and large private-sector driven current
account deficits in a number of countries. The sudden deceleration of inflows will force a sharp adjustment in
private-sector activity. There is a high probability of balance sheet deterioration and possible banking crises
where banks and non-bank financial institutions have expanded credit to the private sector most rapidly. There
may be an especially direct channel in economies where there has been substantial borrowing from foreign
banks, either through branches in the domestic market or through borrowing by local banks. Central and Eastern
European economies, which have experienced especially rapid credit increases, with foreign banks playing a
dominant role in the domestic market, could be most at risk (World Bank, 2008).
In addition, the current global financial crisis influences firms’ capacity to invest as a result of reduced
availability of finance and their propensity to invest due to gloomy economic and markets prospects. Financial
factors have negatively affected TNCs’ capacity to invest, both internally and externally, as tighter credit
conditions and lower corporate profits curtail TNCs’ financial resources for overseas investment projects. On
the one hand, credit has become less abundant and more expensive. The gloomy evolution of markets, including
the looming sharp economic recession worldwide and a heightened appreciation of risk, has also reduced firms’
propensity to invest for further expansion both domestically and internationally of production capacity.
Companies’ investment plans may also be scaled back due to a high level of perceived risks and uncertainties,
in order to develop resilience to possible “worst-case” scenarios regarding financial and economic conditions
(UNCTAD, 2009).
Investment was the main driving force for developing-country growth over the past 5 years,
contributing almost half of the increase in domestic demand. But the crisis will deal a negative shock to
investment in developing markets. It is expected investment in middle-income countries in 2009 to grow at less
than half the 2007 rate of 13 percent (Lin, 2008). In South East Europe, foreign direct investment is expected to
decline sharply in 2009. The Economist Intelligence Unit predicts a decrease in FDI in some South East Europe
countries.
The last channel of the crisis is remittances. Migrant remittances represent the most direct, immediate
and far reaching benefit to migrants and their countries of origin. They are a more constant source of income to
developing countries than official development assistance, foreign direct investment and other private flows.
Moreover, the emergence of remittances as a new strategy for poverty alleviation in developing countries has
spurred multilateral institutions, international organizations, and national governments, among others, to
seriously study, identify and implement measures on how these inflows could be maximized and then harnessed
for the development of migrants’ countries of origin (Pant, 2008).
As labor markets slacken, foreign workers are likely to suffer disproportionate impacts on their
earnings, which will reduce remittances. Remittances from host countries are expected to be decline in response
to the global slowdown but the impact on flows to recipient countries will depend significantly on exchange
rates. According to World Bank (2008) in 28 countries, remittances to developing countries were larger than
revenues from the most important commodity export, and in 36 countries they were larger than private and

11

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

public capital inflows. They are also a powerful poverty reduction mechanism. For example, in Nicaragua
remittances reduce poverty incidence by four percentage points on average, and five percentage points in urban
areas. In Albania, households with migrants to Italy and Greece have an incidence of poverty that is half the
national rate (i.e., 15 and 19 percent compared to an average of 32 percent). Remittance flows from host to
developing countries, which reached an estimated $295 billion in 2008, began slowing in the second half of
2008 and are projected to slow sharply in 2009.

The Economic Sustainability in South East Europe
Economic sustainability requires that economic benefits exceed or at least balance costs and
conditioned mainly by supply and demand. South East Europe Countries, under the current financial crisis, try
to achieve their economic sustainability. Is it possible to achieve this aim for South East Europe countries next
three years?
Following section tries to answer this question.
Before current financial crisis, the growth in real GDP in South East Europe was pretty good.
Especially, Montenegro has a high growth rate. But most of them started to have a decrease in their GDP in
2007. According to estimates, the SEE countries are expected to suffer a significant drop in GDP: the Albania,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, FYR Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia. Graph 1
provides the developments 2005-2008 and outlook 2009-2011. The most of the countries in SEE may start
growing again in 2010 and 2011. However, Bosnia and Herzegovina may take this process slower than the other
SEE countries (Graph 1).

Source: EBRD Transition Report 2007; wiiw 2009. *2009-2011 forecast.
Graph 1: Growth in real GDP in South East Europe, 2005-2011
The degree of the financial openness shows integration with the rest of the world. Financial openness
has followed a fluctuation during the past decade in the region. Although the financial crises in the end of the
1990s had a negative effect on the capital flows tin SEE countries, the financial openness increased between
2001 and 2005 and the most of the SEE countries experienced an increase in the financial depth in this term.
The amount of M2 as a percentage of GDP increased the most of the SEE countries: Albania, Croatia, Romania,
Macedonia and Bulgaria. The other important thing is an increase in foreign banks in the region. The amount of
foreign banks increased significantly in SEE countries between 1995 and 2006 (Terzi, 2009).
The SEE foreign banks and non-bank financial institutions have over the past decade accounted for
more than half of the corporate lending market and two thirds of the home-loan business. The countries are
strongly dependent on foreign currency lending, which has mainly been provided by foreign banks to their
southeastern subsidiaries. With the credit freeze domestic banks and local companies are finding it increasingly
difficult to refinance their foreign debt holdings. A lack of credit availability from foreign institutions is
particularly dire when it is also affecting successful firms in the region. Export capacity in the region is
dependent on trade finance being by local banks at affordable rates. But local credit availability is currently

12

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

drying up. Moreover, the interest rate on export finance loans to Bulgaria, Serbia or Romania has gone from 1.2
percent above libor to about six percentage point higher (Bastian, 2009).
In addition, global financial crisis affected the external liabilities in the region. Data from the Bank for
International Settlements shows that East, Central and Southeast European Banks accumulated total external
liabilities to banks that report to the BIS of USD 1.657 trillion as of September 2008. USD 1.511 trillion of that
total amounts is owed to euro-zone commercial banks (Bastian, 2009).
Another effect of the current financial crisis is on the consumer prices. Under the impact of the
international crisis, the most of SEE countries have reached a point where high inflation is likely to depress
credit growth in 2008 (EBRD, 2008). The inflation in the region is expected to decline in 2009. The forecasts in
2010-11 show that the inflation may increase again in this area (Graph 2).

Graph 2. Consumer Prices in South East Europe, 2005-2011 (change in % against previous year)
Source: EBRD Transition Report 2007; wiiw 2009.*2009-2011 forecast.
Current account deficit is important indicator for the countries to see the effect of the crises. All SEE
countries, the current account deficit in 2008 exceed 10 % of GDP. It ran as high as 27% in Montenegro, 25%
in Bulgaria and 18% in Serbia, while it ranged between 10 and 15 % in Albania, Croatia, Macedonia and
Romania. The current account deficits in the SEE are high in general. As many East Europe Countries run large
current account deficit, they are dependent on foreign capital and loans to continue their operations. The
forecasts show a decrease in their current account deficits in 2010-2011(Graph 3).

Graph 3. Current Account in South East Europe, 2005-2011 (in % of GDP)
Source: EBRD Transition Report 2007; wiiw 2009. *2009-2011 forecast.

13

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

The government deficit in SEE countries will probably increase in both 2009 and 2010. The main
reason will be a combination of lower revenues and overextended expenditures. The increase in expenditures
will mainly stem from the need to support ailing financial and non-financial companies and pay out higher
unemployment benefits. Under such circumstances, the countries in question will hardly be in a position to
enact substantial demand-stimulating fiscal policies over a long period (wiiw, 2009).
In terms of foreign direct investment, the year 2008 marked the end of a growth cycle in international
investment that started in 2004 and saw world foreign direct investment flows reach a historic record of $1.8
trillion in 2007. Due to the impact of the ongoing worldwide financial and economic crisis, FDI flow decline by
more than 20 per cent in 2008. A further decrease in FDI flows can be expected in 2009, as the full
consequences of the crisis on transnational corporations’ investment expenditures will continue to unfold
(UNCTAD, 2009).
Romania is one of the most attractive countries in South East Europe in terms of foreign direct
investment. Croatia and Bulgaria also attract the foreign direct investment. The rest of the region has less
foreign direct investment than the other countries. Until 2007, the flow of foreign direct investment to South
East Europe was pretty good (Tab.1). However, foreign direct investment is expected to decline sharply in
2009. The Economist Intelligence Unit predicts a decrease by 46 percent between 2008 and 2009, with FDI
considerably declining in Romania, Montenegro, Serbia and Bulgaria.
Table 1. Foreign Direct Investment (in US$ million), 2005-2007
2005
2006
2,298
5,016
Bulgaria
1,548
3,516
Croatia
6,587
11,430
Romania
265
300
Albania
667
723
Bosnia and Herzegovina
97
350
FYR, Macedonia
474
550
Montenegro
1,481
4,400
Serbia
Source: EBRD, Transition Report, 2007

2007
3,090
2,363
9,600
400
791
150
161
3000

South East Europe countries experienced a high unemployment rates. The unemployment rate in the
most of the region is more than 10%. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia have a
higher unemployment rate than the others. Moreover, the forecasts show that the unemployment in this region
will continue to stay a high rate in next two years (Graph 4). Especially, the unemployment rates in Bulgaria
and Romania are expected to come up a high level in 2009.

Graph 4. Unemployment, rate in %, annual average, 2007-2011
Source: wiiw, 2009; Labour Force Survey. *2009-2011 forecast.
Migrant workers’ transfers in the Southeastern Europe constitute a major economic factor. In 2007
remittances as a share of GDP reached 17.2 percent in Bosnia &amp; Herzegovina, 10 percent in Albania (Tab. 2).
Remittances slightly increased in 2008. But the economic crisis will leave its mark on migrant workers’
continued ability to transfer such amounts back home. Many of these labors are employed in sectors adversely
affected by the recession in their host countries, in particular in car manufacturing, construction and household

14

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

work. A decline in remittances from relatives working abroad will affect families and their income expectations
during 2009 (Bastian, 2009).
Table 2. Workers’ Remittances in the SEE (US $ Million)
2007
2008
In % of GDP (2007)
1.071
1.071
10.1
Albania
2.520
2.600
17.2
Bosnia&amp;Herzegovina
2.086
2.200
5.7
Bulgaria
267
315
3.6
Macedonia,FYR
8.533
9.000
5.6
Romania
4.910
5.100
13.8
Serbia + Montenegro
Source: World Bank estimates based on the International Monetary Fund's Balance of Payments Statistics
Yearbook 2008 and World Bank, Migration and Remittances Factbook 2008.

Conclusion
The world economy is going through difficult times. The turmoil in the international financial markets
over the last year is having an increasingly adverse effect on the SEE countries. Under the current financial
crisis, the growth in South East Europe will probably decrease and consumer prices will likely go down in 2009.
South East Europe countries have been running current account deficits of 5 percent of GDP or more. These
economies will be highly vulnerable to swings. The crisis will deal a negative shock to investment in South East
Europe. This will lead to a decline foreign direct investment. Unemployment will continue to go up. And as
labor market slacken, foreign workers are likely to suffer negative effects on their earnings, will reduce
remittances. The full impact of the financial turmoil will depend on the behaviour of the countries economy
policies in the next three years.

References
Akyuz, Y. (2008). The Current Global Financial Turmoil and Asian Developing Countries. TWN, Malaysia.
Bastian, J.(2009). Falling Behind Again ? Southeast Europe and The Global Crisis. Eliamep Thesis. March.
EBRD (2008). Transition Report.
Lin, J.Y. (2008). The Impact of the Financial Crisis on Developing Countries. Korea Development Institute.
Nanto, D.K. (2009). The Global Financial Crisis: Analysis and Policy Implications. CRS RL 34742.
Pant, B. (2008). Mobilizing Remittances for Productive Use: A Policy-Oriented Approach. NRB Working Paper 4.
Terzi, N. (2009). Financial Globalization And Development in SEE. Journal of Academic Studies, Vol.11, No. 40. FebruaryApril.
UNCTAD (2009). Assessing the Impact of the Current Financial and Economic Crisis on Global FDI Flows, UNCTAD.
UNDP.(2009). The Financial Crisis and Its Impact on Developing Countries”, Working Paper, UNDP.
Wiiw (2009). wiiw Forecast for Central, “East and Southeast Europe, Kazakhstan and China: Differentiated Impact of the
Global Crisis”.
World Bank (2008). Global Financial Crisis and Implications for Developing Countries. G-20 Finance Ministers’ Meeting
Brazil.

15

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="4000">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/bac7a9752159c374897bd56294632567.doc</src>
        <authentication>c548a96c734e7a52a88c042aa05083cf</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24716">
                <text>127</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24717">
                <text>Global Financial Crisis and Economic Sustainability in South East Europe</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24718">
                <text>ASLAN, Nurdan
TERZI, Nuray</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24719">
                <text>The global financial system has witnessed rapid growth and substantial  structural change during the last ten years leading to globalization of financial markets.  The integration of financial markets has accentuated the rapid flow of capital across  borders as well as magnified the contagious effects of financial crisis with wide  implications for transmission of financial policies on the domestic economy and  internationally. The global financial crisis has become a major international event and has  spread to developing countries through trade linkages, a reduction of FDI and remittances,  and a collapse in commodity prices. The effect of the global financial crisis was worsened  by rising global energy prices which pushed up inflation. The global financial crisis has  evolved differently from other major crises that have hit the developing world. This paper  analyzes the economic sustainability in South East Europe against global financial crisis.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24720">
                <text>2009-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24721">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>HB Economic Theory</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3393" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4185">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/1623a69b95ca04ef9f17f7dd8b2deb70.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e24e0bdad8a3ef387827fbd6d5245501</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="25934">
                    <text>1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

Global Financial Crisis and Its Impact on Balkans
Ergin ĐSMAĐL
President of COFER, Macedonia
e.ismail@coferweb.org
Semi ŞAHĐN
Finance Director of COFER, Macedonia
s.sahin@coferweb.org

Abstract: The aim of writing this paper is to reveal that the implication of the crisis to the
western Balkans has been not of a sort of financial crisis, but an economic turbulence which
has occurred as a result of lack of demand in the world markets to the western Balkan
products and falling sources of finance. Expansionary fiscal policies on top of external trade
deficits growing at record levels, calls into question the ability of the western Balkan
economies to finance the needs, that in turn increases their vulnerability and that may lead to a
possible financial crisis in future if the global financial crisis continues to sustain until 2010.
What is expected to ease the conditions is the seasonally strong increase in construction, food
exports and private transfers during the spring and summer seasons, expected to close the
gaps that are being established through growing external trade deficits. Increase in
construction business, growing food exports and raising remittances may offset vulnerabilities
of the economies and may limit further economic and financial crisis in the region.
Keywords: global financial crisis; Balkans; growth; unemployment; remittances

Financial Crisis in the World, Economic Crisis in the Balkans
What started as a global financial crisis has become an economic crisis. The world financial crisis
emerged from a property bubble and a credit boom. Bad debts soared and banking sector in the developed
economies became insolvent. The implication of the crisis to the western Balkans has been not of a sort of
financial crisis, but an economic turbulence which has occurred as a result of lack of demand in the world
markets to the western Balkan products and falling sources of finance. Investments, remittances, industrial
production, foreign exchange reserves and employment rates have fallen. As a result, growth has slowed down.
Expansionary fiscal policies on top of external trade deficits growing at record levels, calls into question the
ability of the western Balkan economies to finance the needs, that in turn increases their vulnerability and that
may lead to a possible financial crisis in future if the global financial crisis continues to sustain until 2010.
The governments of the region of the western Balkans, when the crisis hit in September 2008, argued
that they were immune to the crisis. However, as their export-oriented economies began to slump in the autumn
of 2008 due to the slid in the world commodity prices, which resulted in tens of thousands of citizens of western
Balkan countries loosing their jobs, the governments of the region became more open about the difficulties of
their economic situation, although continuing to argue that the effects of the financial crisis are least to be felt in
western Balkans in comparison with other regional economies of Europe such as that felt in Iceland, Baltic states
or Ukraine. The culprit many of the governments have now settled on is the world out of Balkans. Even wider
publics took comfort of this argument due to relatively low exposure of the local economies to the world
financial markets.
Although the governments continue to predict that the economies would show growth and small
contraction in 2009, the economic indicators show that the economies are in some degree of trouble at the
moment with industrial output, foreign investment and remittances falling and unemployment rising.1 Growth
forecasts are down across the region from 5 to 3%, investors are slowing projects and governments are drawing
up rescue plans.2 Independent economists think that 3% growth of GDP for 2009 is wildly optimistic. Depending
on the world manufacturing and commodity prices, they could show growth by 2 or even 1% of GDP.
For the small economies of a scale of western Balkans that have boomed for the past seven-eight years,
following the end of conflicts in the region in 2001 - that last one being the conflict of Macedonia in 2001 - with
1
2

The Economist, "The Balkans: A year in the life of Kosovo", 14 February 2009, p. 14.
The Economist, "The western Balkans: A stuck region", 14 February 2009, p. 36.

381

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

annual average GDP growth reaching 5%, economic slowdown and contraction in GDP that has started to be
seen starting from the autumn of 2008 is a particularly harsh blow to western Balkans. The whole region, except
Serbia and Croatia, has escaped the global financial crisis however it has run into economic crisis due to the
recession in its export markets, including EU. As small open economies the western Balkan countries are
uncomfortably exposed to the world crisis and particularly to EU as their trade with the EU member states
comprises their largest trade volume. Since the global financial crisis hit in September 2008 growth has turned to
contraction and unemployment is mounting in the region. Also, any lingering hopes that the western Balkans
might escape relatively unscathed from the global financial storms were dashed when managers of the foreign
banks in the region, mainly those of Austria and Greece, sought support from the international finance
institutions. This shows that, although the economies are small and relatively well protected, they are exposed to
the global financial crisis that has been replicated in the region in the form of economic crisis.
The falling manufacturing and commodity prices in the world markets are causing problems. Depended
on steel and metal exports, the region has been hit hard by the global slump in commodity prices and by the
expensive imported electricity, sending metal prices into a tailspin. The price of the metals has fallen by almost
two-thirds since mid-2008 leading to slowdown in the region's economies. More than a fifth of economic output
and employment are based on exports, making them particularly vulnerable to a fall in global growth and trade.
Manufacturing and exporting economies are grinding to a halt, as demand across the world melts away. The
western Balkan economies contracted further in last quarter of 2008, as a dispute between Russia and Ukraine
over gas prices reduced energy supply to the region and forced the countries' heavy industries to go slow, cutting
production or even halting assembly lines. For example, Silmak, a significant producer of ferro-nickel in
Jegunovce, in the western part of Macedonia, has cut production and has laid 700 workers due to the drastic fall
of the ferro-nickel's price in the world markets.1 The nearby brick factory Kiro Kucuk in Veles, in the central
part of Macedonia, also exemplifies the gravity of the setback. On 1 March 2009 the employees turned up for
their final day's work. The factory will not reopen until the economy recovers.2 A similar story could be told in
many countries of the region. Macedonia is not alone depended on exporting metallurgical industries. Serbia has
suffered far more as global demand for the goods in which its industry specialises has evaporated. For example,
US Steel, one of Serbia's leading exporters, closed one plant.3 These examples are reflection of the data released
for January 2009 that industrial production, which accounts for a fifth of total value added in Macedonia4 and
Serbia has plummeted by 17%, its steepest fall in years.5 The Macedonian State Statistics Office reported that the
local companies have been operating by using 50% of their capacities in the course of January 2009 and their
situation has deteriorated on a monthly basis, which has led to a drop in employment rate as well as a large fall in
production due to the reduced foreign demand for Macedonian products, insufficient domestic demand, uncertain
economic situation and the financial problems. These are hotbeds that might be transferred to other economic
sectors, such as the textile and leather industry and to the construction sector, which comprise large share in the
country's GDP.
The gloom reflects growing worries about underlying weaknesses that make the countries especially
vulnerable to recession happening in the EU and other economies to which Balkan economies are depended.
So companies have announced big lay-offs as demand has fallen and factories have closed.6 The official
unemployment figure of Macedonia already stands at 33% (unofficially it is probably 35% or more) and is set to
rise as the new basic salary estimates will only count employed those who pay social security benefits.
Unemployment rate in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in Kosovo are more than 40%. The unofficial
unemployment rate is, however, much higher and many who say that they have jobs are in fact on indefinite
unpaid leave. The economists forecast that unemployment region-wide will rise. Most of that rise will be the
result of fall in trade (many exporting companies have laid off workers), and due to declining investments.
Coffee streets from Knjez Mihajlova in Belgrade to Kej Vardar in Skopje to Bash Charshija in Sarajevo
are busy during sunlight as young people, forming more than 50% of the unemployed force in the region, sip
their coffees. Unemployment rates are soaring and offices of the Employment Agencies in whole region are full
with people looking for work.
The stock markets have plunged as well. The Zagreb stock exchange index lost 42% during the last
quarter of 2008 and others such as Sarajevo Stock Exchange, dropped by 19% during the same quarter, leading

1

Dnevnik, "Silmak prekina so rabota", 2 Mart 2009, p. 7.
Utrinski, "Rabotnicite od Kucuk izvisija", 3 Mart 2009.
3
European Commission, DG ECFIN, EU Candidate and Pre-Accession Countries Economic Quarterly, 9 January 2009, p.
30.
4
Ibid, p. 10.
5
Utrinski, "Pad na proizvodstvoto za 16.7%", 27 February 2009.
6
International Monetary Fund, "Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Staff Report for the 2008 Article IV
Consultation", Prepared by Staff Representatives for the 2008 Consultation with Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
11 November 2008, p. 11.
2

382

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo
to an annual decrease of 67% in 2008.1 The Belgrade Stock Exchange tumbled and its index lost 75% during
2008.2
An important sector that waits to be affected is the real estate market as the credits have gone down and
the borrowers are unable to pay back their monthly loans. The scale of the bubble in the region is as big as in
troubling EU cities. House prices rose further in Belgrade than they did in Tirana. So did commercial-property
prices. As a result, demand for new homes has dried up although prices have remained stable and over inflated,
with Belgrade topping the prices where average residential square meter is sold at 2000 euros. The housing
boom in the region is among the extreme, measured by real price increases and resulting overvaluations. This is
a bubble which is waiting to burst. Another bubble which is waiting to burst is commercial property where office
blocks and shops are overvalued. Both these booms have been fuelled by debt, another reason why the region
looks particularly vulnerable now.
There is much to suggest that the pain is felt most by small enterprises, labelled as small and medium
sized enterprises (SMEs) that are the backbone of the western Balkan economies. SMEs seem especially
vulnerable to the downturn. Many specialise in textile and these are also the products whose orders are the first
to be cancelled when economies slow and companies trim investment. These firms are finding themselves
chronically short of orders and capital.
The governments in the region have launched actions to stimulate their economies. Montenegrin
government launched a plan with significant capital expenditures and other stimulus to businesses at some 10%
of the projected GDP for 2009.3 In November 2008, the Macedonian government unveiled measures worth 5-6%
of GDP.4 Other governments as well have unveiled packages that include extra billions to finance investment,
infrastructure projects, extra benefits for poorer and tax cuts. The central banks as well have joined in tightening
monetary policies and increasing controls of the credit markets. These measures mean the economy may suffer
only a mild downturn. Tightening of control by the central banks has encouraged banks to drastically decrease
the amount of lending. When there are no loans for companies and consumers, the consumption of domestic and
foreign products decreases, leading towards economic stagnation. So officials are also trying to inject cash and
confidence into the banking system, avoiding confidence crisis that in October 2008 hit Albania, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia where the lack of confidence led to a withdrawal of deposits by
population.5 They have done this in various ways. Croatian central bank has abolished reserve requirements. The
Bank of Albania has limited Banks' exposure towards their foreign parent companies.6 The National Bank of
Serbia has eliminated the tax on savings income to help boost foreign exchange liquidity.7 The Bosnian central
bank has increased the level of guaranteed savings deposits from 3500 to 10.000 euros and the Montenegrin
government has given full guarantee to deposits. The Montenegrin government has also given capital boost to
ailing Prva Banka to allow it to expand landing, especially for small businesses.8
The global crisis has slowed down western Balkans' credit-fuelled boom. Estimates of output have
slumped and currencies have dropped as capital inflows have dried up. The bad debts have raised as local
customers default particularly those that have borrowed in foreign currencies that have since risen relative to
their own. One of the dirty habits from the boom is that as local loan growth outpaced deposit growth.9 There is
likelihood that one or more of the ex-communist Balkan countries will default on its debt. The biggest weakness
lies in a financial system that has combined badly run local banks with loosely overseen subsidiaries of western
ones. Some local banks now depend on their parents' willingness to keep financing them – and those parents
have plenty of problems at home. The Greek government has told its banks to draw back from their lending in
the Balkans. Debt burdens are high today because so much was borrowed in the recent past. This began as a
logical response to declining interest rates, low inflation, rising asset prices and less frequent recessions. Some
countries have an extra problem of big external government debts (in Croatia's case, the gross figure is near 85%
of GDP). For other countries, the strong Euro is a problem; they have pegged their currencies to it.10
Tumbling exchange rates raised the real burden of foreign-currency loans, forced policymakers to keep
interest rates high. However, by boosting exports, a weaker currency can offer a route to recovery. In
Macedonia, by contrast, denar stays strong as the economy slumps, deflation setting in which will lead debts to
grow and possibly banking problems to grow. Possible threat of financial crisis has led the Euro to be seen as a
shelter for western Balkan economies from the storms. The local currencies dinar of Serbia, kuna of Croatia, lek
1

European Commission, DG ECFIN, p. 23.
Ibid, p. 31.
3
Ibid, p. 26.
4
Ibid, p. 10.
5
Ibid, p. 3.
6
Ibid, p. 18.
7
Ibid, p. 31.
8
Ibid, p. 27.
9
The Economist, "Eastern European banks: The ties that band", 21 February 2009, p. 73.
10
The Economist, "Eastern Europe: Argentina on the Danube?", 21 February 2009, p. 14.
2

383

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

of Albania have lost their value against the Euro. Kuna depreciated by 2.9% and lek 1% vis-à-vis the euro in the
last quarter of 2008,1 where as the Serbia's dinar has lost close to 17% of its value against the Euro in the same
period. The central bank of Macedonia has spent over 50 million euros of its reserves in January 2009 alone,
largest since the introduction of denar in early 1990s, to cushion the devaluation of its currency and avoid public
panic.2 Macedonia will suffer damages if the Euro loses its value in relation to the dollar as it would affect the
Macedonian export to EU markets. The increase of the dollar value will also have negative implications for
Macedonia as the country uses this foreign currency to purchase twice as much as it sells. The value of the Euro
in comparison to the dollar has been declining since autumn 2008. The drop of the value of the Euro with this
fixed course of the denar in relation to the Euro currency will damage the Macedonian economy and de-motivate
exporters primarily exporting to EU states.3 The government in Macedonia also has shredded investor
confidence by calling for decreasing the amounts given to private pension funds.
Recovery is possible only through strong demand in the rest of the world (which is to lack for some
time), that would lead exports to soar, allowing quick recovery. However, today demand is falling rapidly across
the globe and most big developed economies buying Balkans products face simultaneous banking crises. With
demand weak everywhere, the familiar route to recovery is blocked.4 For the largest trading partners of western
Balkan economies, the EU countries, figures that came out in February 2009, showed that Euro-area GDP shrank
at an annualised rate of around 5% in the fourth quarter of 2008. The IMF has forecasted that Euro-area GDP
will decline by 2% in 2009 and barely recover in 2010. Countries with huge current-account deficits are most
exposed in a credit drought. So the hope had been that weaker economies of Balkans would be offset by faster
economic recovery in EU economies and support by the local banks mother banks' in EU. Unfortunately, the EU
economies are facing recession and mother banks and mother countries have asked them to lend first to domestic
businesses and households and not to transfer money to their subsidiaries in Balkans. The Greeks publicly
advised banks to be more prudent about transferring bail-out funds to Balkan subsidiaries.5
The western Balkan countries face a current account deficit this year in average of around 14%.
Nevertheless, the crisis for example has not stopped the Macedonian and Kosovar governments from doling out
billions of euros' worth of cultural projects.
Financial crisis is also having effect on remittances, a large share in GDP of the economies of Balkans.
Foreign workers have been first to be laid off in the western economies. Remittances make up more than a tenth
of the GDP of Balkan economies. Although they are likely to fall as a result of the slumping world economy, as
it has been the case with Albania, where remittances' inflows have declined from 13% of GDP in 2007 to 11% of
GDP in the last quarter of 2008,6 they may be less affected by the world economy.7 It is expected that people
keep the cross border payments going even when their incomes fall. Migration from western Balkans to EU
countries is expected to rise as the borders are getting opened through visa facilitation and liberalisation
programmes. However, this rise will be balanced with the recession in the EU economies where it means fewer
jobs for migrants.
In surveys, the economy has leapt to the top of voters' concerns. Overall the public is scared and
uncertain. So far, the Balkans has escaped the civic unrest seen in the Baltic States, Iceland, or elsewhere.8 There
are not yet signs of discontent, except concerns expressed by politicians and economists. Thousands taking to the
streets to protest against crises in Baltic States and Ukraine have not resembled in Balkans. However, pundits
predict unrest in towns that rely entirely on one ailing factory or industry. But so far the signs are limited.
The middle class in the whole region is under a great threat. The middle class flourished during
communist times. As economy goes into reverse they may well be hit harder than the rich or poor. They work in
export industries so their jobs are unsafe. The other part of the middle class, who are employed in the state
administration, and whose jobs are relatively safe, they have started to borrow, so are hurt by the credit crunch.

To End with a Negative and a Positive Note
The economies of the Balkan region, except those of Serbia and Croatia, have escaped the financial
crisis. However they are facing the biggest economic crisis since 1991, when they left the communism regime.
Corporate profits have collapsed. Big manufacturers' output is down. Metal producers have halved or halted their

1

European Commission, DG ECFIN, p. 7.
Biljana Krstevska, "Stopeni uste 53 milioni evra", Dnevnik, 27 February 2009; Utrinski, "Samo so dobra plata do kredit",
27 February 2009.
3
Abdulmenaf Bexheti, "Experts on Fixed Course of Denar", Skopjediem, 25 February 2009.
4
The Economist, "America's banking crisis: Worse than Japan?", 14 February 2009, p. 76.
5
The Economist, "Charlemagne: Single-market blues", 7 February 2009, p. 30.
6
European Commission, DG ECFIN, p. 19.
7
The Economist, "Remittances: Trickle-down economics", 21 February 2009, p. 74.
8
The Economist, "The western Balkans: A stuck region", 14 February 2009, p. 36.
2

384

�1. International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo

production. Companies have slashed jobs and investment. Industrial output and employment have fallen at
record levels not seen since 1991.
What is expected to ease the conditions is the seasonally strong increase in construction, food exports
and private transfers (workers remittances) during the spring and summer seasons. These seasonal effects are
expected to close the gaps that are being established through growing external trade deficits. Increase in
construction business, growing food exports and raising remittances may offset vulnerabilities of the economies
and may limit further economic and financial crisis in the region.

385

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25928">
                <text>278</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25929">
                <text>Global Financial Crisis and Its Impact on Balkans</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25930">
                <text>iSMAiL, Ergin
SAHiN, Semi</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25931">
                <text>The aim of writing this paper is to reveal that the implication of the crisis to the  western Balkans has been not of a sort of financial crisis, but an economic turbulence which  has occurred as a result of lack of demand in the world markets to the western Balkan  products and falling sources of finance. Expansionary fiscal policies on top of external trade  deficits growing at record levels, calls into question the ability of the western Balkan  economies to finance the needs, that in turn increases their vulnerability and that may lead to a  possible financial crisis in future if the global financial crisis continues to sustain until 2010.  What is expected to ease the conditions is the seasonally strong increase in construction, food  exports and private transfers during the spring and summer seasons, expected to close the  gaps that are being established through growing external trade deficits. Increase in  construction business, growing food exports and raising remittances may offset vulnerabilities  of the economies and may limit further economic and financial crisis in the region.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25932">
                <text>2009-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="25933">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>HB Economic Theory</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3068" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3836">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/2714c8c9acbd99ce7429aae01f84bd5b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2e1af8003dd9929120ef752f6df24450</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="23665">
                    <text>2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

Global Financial Crisis: Economic Austerity Measures Of Turkey
Merve KILIÇ
Fatih University, Turkey
mervekilic@fatih.edu.tr
Abstract: The global financial crisis has been the worst financial crisis since the one related to the
Great Depression of the 1930s. It contributed to widespread business contraction, increases in
unemployment, shrinking government revenues, declines in consumer wealth, and so a significant
decline in economic activity. Many causes have been cited about the global financial crisis by
leading economists and experts. Both market-based and regulatory solutions have been presented
to lessen the dramatic effects of the crisis.
The collapse of a housing bubble, which peaked in the United States in 2006, erupted in 2007 and
led to a global financial crisis in 2008. This crisis has been triggered by a dramatic rise in
mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures in the U.S. and has caused the values of securities tied to
housing prices. So it has damaged financial institutions all over the world. The financial crisis
which began in industrialized countries quickly spread to emerging and developing economies.
Questions about bank liquidity, declines in credit availability, and damaged investor confidence
had a negative impact on global markets, and caused large losses during 2008.
This global crisis also affected Turkey. But the effects of this crisis on Turkey were limited.
Demand in global and national markets has decreased. So the trade level in both national and
global markets has also decreased. Bank‘s liquidity and profitability seemed healthy during such a
crucial crisis. There were several policies of Turkish Government to diminish the effects of
financial crisis about interest rates, tax rates, exports rediscount credit limit etc.
This study aims to analyze the effects of the global financial crisis and the measures taken by
Turkey to lessen the negative effects of it on Turkish economy.

Introduction
A first glance at Turkey‘s performance in the current global financial crisis shows that it has managed to
weather the global stormy conditions relatively well. Although Turkey has been negatively affected by this crisis, it
has succeeded to avoid collapsing into a currency and financial crisis. Activity in the real sector has contracted
sharply, mainly as a result of both collapsing external demand and strongly declining domestic demand. A financial
crisis similar to those in the 1990s and in 2000/2001 has been avoided before. Experiences of Turkey from those
previous crises have conserved it from the last global financial crisis. However there are still negative signals in the
economy that have occurred because of old vulnerabilities of the Turkish economy. Warning indications that the
Turkish economy include developments related to the timing of the economic slowdown, the fairly large correction
of the exchange rate at the beginning of the crisis, concerns regarding the external indebtedness of the private sector
and the numerous voices calling for policy anchors, such as the introduction of binding fiscal rules or a new IMF
arrangement (Macovei, 2009).
This global financial has affected not only U.S., but also all the countries in the world. 2008-2009 financial
crisis was the deepest one since 1929 Great Depression. Governments have taken several measures to decrease the
effects of this crisis in their countries. Turkish Government also has taken several measures toward global financial
crisis. Although Turkey experienced crises before, this last one was different from others. 1990s and 2000/2001
crises of Turkey were triggered by domestic instability rather than international factors.
The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the economic austerity measures of Turkey to lessen the affects
of the global financial crisis. In this paper general causes and the consequences of the crisis will be also assessed.
The market collapse which started in U.S. now dispersed all over the countries and affected the world economy. As a
developing country, Turkey, has applied several policies. Those policies should be some different than Turkey
applied in prior crisis, because the causes of the last one was so different.
The paper is organized as follows. The second section analyzes the causes and consequences of the Global
Financial Crisis which has occurred in the U.S. The third part explains the effects of this crisis on Turkish Economy.

712

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo
The economic austerity measures which have been taken by Turkish Government have been explained in the fourth
section. The last section gives the conclusions of this study.

Causes and Consequences of the 2008-2009 Global Financial Crises
The turmoil in the U.S. subprime mortgage market, which erupted in the second half of 2007, started to
spillover to the overall markets challenging both financial and economic stability. There are mainly two reasons
underlying the widespread and devastating effects of this crisis. The first one of these is globalization phenomenon
that has gained pace early 1980s reaching peak 2000s. Globalization led to financial and economic systems to be
highly integrated. The second one is that this is a financial crisis and that erupted in many developed economies
simultaneously (www.tcmb.gov.tr).
There were other reasons that had triggered the global financial crisis underlying those two main reasons.
The first one was the bursting of the housing bubble. Falling house prices have a major effect on household wealth,
spending and defaults on loans held by institutions. Events in the U.S. typify a global phenomenon. From 2000 to
2006, house prices in some areas doubled and then subsequently collapsed. While house prices were rising so
strongly, credit was supplied liberally to meet the demand as perceptions of risk fell. The rising wealth boosted
confidence and spending (Mckibbin and Stockel, 2009). Low interest rates and large inflows of foreign funds created
easy credit conditions and encouraged debt-financed consumption. Easy credit, and a belief that house prices would
continue to appreciate, had encouraged many subprime borrowers to obtain adjustable-rate mortgages. This credit
and house price explosion caused a building boom and a surplus of unsold homes. As the number of unsold houses
increased, the U.S. houses prices begin declining in mid-2006. The decline in mortgage payments also reduced the
value of mortgage-backed securities, which eroded the net worth and financial health of banks. This vicious cycle
was at the heart of the crisis (www.wikipedia.org).
The second reason, even though the U.S. had low and sometimes negative savings rates, there was a ―global
savings glut‖ coming from the savings of China, Japan, the Middle East, and Europe. It is widely believed that one of
the driving forces of over lending and reckless investment in the U.S. housing market came from the global
imbalance in savings and investment. The Asian financial crisis occurred in 1997 after some Asian nations suffered
seriously from slumping exchange rates because of a lack of foreign reserve. Many of the emerging countries started
to save their money in foreign reserves, particularly U.S. dollars. This global saving mainly from China, Japan,
Russia, Taiwan, India, Brazil and other oil-exporting countries, was used to buy U.S. Treasury bonds and other U.S.
securities. The global imbalance reflected the chronic shortage of savings relative to investment in the U.S. and other
developed countries, but the substantial savings surplus to investment in emerging countries (Yu et al., 2009).
The third cause was the creative financial intermediation made possible by innovative, but complex,
mortgage securities. These securities were sold globally under a lax financial regulatory system with the promise of
stable and generous long-term returns (Yu et al., 2009). Along with the rise of unregulated lenders came a rise in the
kinds of subprime loans that economists say have sounded an alarm. The large number of adjustable rate mortgages,
interest-only mortgages and ―stated income‖ loans are an example of this thinking. ―Stated income‖ loans, also
called ―no doc‖ loans and, sarcastically, ―liar loans,‖ are a subset of Alt-A loans. The borrower does not have to
provide documentation to substantiate the income stated on the application to finance home purchases. Such loans
should have raised concerns about the quality of the loans if interest rates increased or the borrower became unable
to pay the mortgage (Bianco, 2008).
The causes of global financial crisis are summarized in G-20 Financial Markets and World Economy
Conference Declaration. These developments, together, contributed to excesses and ultimately resulted in severe
market disruption:
During a period of strong global growth, growing capital flows, and prolonged stability earlier this decade,
market participants sought higher yields without an adequate appreciation of the risks and failed to exercise proper
due diligence. At the same time, weak underwriting standards, unsound risk management practices, increasingly
complex and opaque financial products, and consequent excessive leverage combined to create vulnerabilities in the
system. Policy-makers, regulators and supervisors, in some advanced countries, did not adequately appreciate and
address the risks building up in financial markets, keep pace with financial innovation, or take into account the
systemic ramifications of domestic regulatory actions. Major underlying factors to the current situation were, among
others, inconsistent and insufficiently coordinated macroeconomic policies, inadequate structural reforms, which led
to unsustainable global macroeconomic outcomes.
There are long-term and short-term consequences of this global financial crisis. Slower global growth was
one of the dramatic results of the crisis. Global growth stood at 5 percent in 2007, but IMF expects world growth to

713

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo
slow to 3 percent in 2009. Some countries experienced economic contraction after the crisis. In G7 countries except
for the United States and Canada, GDP growth was slower in Q2 of 2008 compared to Q1. Three major European
economies (Italy, France and Germany) experienced negative GDP growth in Q2, and forecasts are for a continued
decline in Q3. The IMF forecasts around 0 percent growth for advanced economies in 2009, and the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco said that the U.S. economy will face a sharp slowdown in the final quarter of 2008 and a
small contraction in the first quarter of 2009. The crisis caused financing challenges for governments. There is some
risk that governments may not be able to guarantee the stability of the financial system, as it has become clear in the
case of Iceland, where the banking sector has assets of around 300% of GDP, something no government could ever
guarantee, at least not on a short-term basis. Other crucial consequence of the crisis was the rising unemployment.
The IMF also predicts that unemployment in the advanced economies will rise from 5.7 percent in 2008 to 6.5
percent in 2009. As economic growth slows, some sectors, including construction and real estate services, are likely
to experience disproportionate employment declines. Significant job losses in the financial sector of the
industrialized nations are also likely. Since its employment peak in December 2006, the U.S. financial industry has
lost 172,000 jobs. In September 2008 alone, the U.S. lost 17,000 financial jobs, representing 10.6% of total
employment losses that month. The financial sector employment in Europe exhibits similar downward trends.
Another result was the decreasing trade volume. According to the IMF, the forecast for world trade volume growth
(in terms of goods and services) has been revised downwards by 1.9 percentage points to reach 4.1% in 2009, with a
likely impact on labor markets in developing and emerging economies. A drop in exports, as well as capital inflow,
may trigger a falloff in investments. Deceleration of growth and deteriorating financing conditions may trigger
further business failures and possibly more banking emergencies – the result being that some countries may slip
toward a balance of payment crisis (Khatiwada and McGirr, 2009).

The Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on Turkish Economy
Turkish economy has high level of integration with world economy through trade and financing channels.
So the contagion of the Turkish economy from the crisis is related with this integration. The problems in global
credit markets have led to loss of consumer confidence, domestic uncertainties and deterioration in risk perceptions,
and so decline in international trade. So, the impact has come mainly through two channels: the collapse in external
demand has affected Turkey‘s key exports while subdued domestic lending and capital inflows have depressed
domestic demand (Macovei, 2009).
The effects of the crisis have been significantly felt after the second quarter of the 2008 when economic
growth rate started to decline in Turkey. As a result, Turkish economy grew by only 0.9 percent in 2008, while the
growth rate was 4.7 percent in 2007. As the global uncertainties intensified at the beginning of 2009, the slowdown
of the economy deepened. The GDP contracted by 14.3 percent in the first quarter of 2009. However, with positive
effects of fiscal stimulus packages the slowdown of the economy moderated in the second quarter. As a result,
Turkish economy contracted by 10.6 in the first half of 2009. The unemployment rate, which was 10.3 percent in
September 2008, increased to 16.1 percent in February 2009. Partly due to the effect of the tax reductions
implemented in certain sectors, the unemployment rate began to fall and realized at 13 percent in June 2009.
Consumer inflation declined to 5.3 percent as of August 2009. It is expected to be around 5 percent at the end of the
year. The Central Bank short-term interest rates decreased to 7.25 percent, down by 10.5 percentage points compared
with the last quarter of 2008. Market interest rates also decreased in line with the interest rate policy of the Central
Bank (www.tbb.org.tr). Both external and internal demand decreased, and so output and income declined. External
financing became limited. The unemployment rate increased. On the other hand, interest and inflation rates have
decreased (Tab. 1).

GDP (YTL/TL)
Real GDP Growth
Inflation
Unemployment
Rate
The Central Bank
Short-Term
Interest Rates

Dec.2002
275.032
6.2
29.7
10.3

Dec.2003
356.680
5.3
18.4
10.5

Dec.2004
430.511
9.4
9.3
10.3

Dec.2005
486.401
8.4
7.7
10.3

Dec.2006
575.784
6.89
9.7
8.8

Dec. 2007
856.387
4.67
8.4
10.6

Dec. 2008
950.144
-1.1
10.1
13.6

Nov. 2009
700.958
-6.5
6.53
13.0

44

26

18.0

13.5

17.5

15.75

15.0

6.5

Table 1: Selected Economic Variables (percentage)
Source: TURKSTAT

714

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

Foreign direct investment came into Turkey has also adversely been affected by this crisis. The liquidity
crunch which has been triggered by the crisis eventually led to a downward trend in foreign direct investments.
According to UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), FDI inflows declined by 15
percent according to preliminary figures of 2008. According to UNCTAD data, investment inflows into developed
countries dropped 32.7 percent, while inflows into developing countries increased by 3.6 percent. In the first ten
months of 2009, FDI inflows to Turkey have reached to 6.622 billion USD. In parallel to the decline in global FDI
inflows in 2008, FDI inflows declined by 18 percent in Turkey and received a total of 18 billion USD. The decline in
FDI inflows to Turkey are reflecting the global downward trend (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: FDI (Foreign Direct Inflows) to Turkey (2002-2009)
Source: www.treasury.gov.tr
The effects of the crisis on Turkish economy can be classified as effects on real economy, effects on
financial markets, and effects on banking sector.
The Impact on Real Economy
Global financial economic crisis has a significant negative impact on the real economy of Turkey. The
negative effects of the global crisis on Turkey‘s real economy have become highly evident in the last quarter of 2008
and in the first quarter 2009. The real sector has been impacted through two main channels: external demand has
shrunk significantly since October 2008, and domestic demand has contracted in tandem with deteriorating business
prospects and lending conditions (Macovei, 2009). The index of industrial production has declined sharply since
August 2008. Industrial capacity in this global financial crisis has decreased more than it decreased in 2001 financial
crisis. Manufacturing industry is an important part of Turkish economy. It creates employment and export
opportunities. More specifically, about 4.5 million work force is employed and about 95% export of export generated
in the manufacturing industry. Due to the economic crisis, the manufacturing production declined (Çiçek and Hatırlı,
2009). Several industries, in particular car industry, were highly sensitive to a drop in external demand, mainly that
originating from the European Union countries. Annual decline in the automotive sector doubled the rate recorded in
the 2001 crisis. In the 2001 crisis, the lowest level attained by the drop in the capacity utilization rate was 68.5% in
April 2001, whereas in the current crisis, the capacity utilization rate sank to 63.8% in both January and February
2009 in the automotive industry. Production in the automotive sector contracted on average by almost 30% annually
in the second half of 2009 (Tab. 2). The machinery and textiles sectors are also contracted by around 24% and 20%,
respectively in 2008 (Tab. 3 and Tab. 4).

715

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2008 (11
months)

2009 (11
months)

Change (%) 20082009

Production
(Thousand)
Export (Thousand)

864

916

1.026

1.133

1.147

1.108

775

-30

519

561

706

830

910

873

560

-35

Exp./Production (%)

60

61

69

73

79

79

72

-

Table 2: Production and Export of Automotive Industry
Source: OSD

Dec.2006
107.8
107.7
100.1
113.8
110.0

Dec.
2007
115.3
114.8
102.9
120.9
126.7

Dec.
2008
114.3
112.7
91.4
115
133.9

Oct.
2009
117.9
116.7
93.2
114.2
109

Total Industry
Manufacturing
Textile
Machinery
Transportation
Equipment
Table 3: Industrial Production Indexes (2005=100.0)

Dec.2006

Dec.
2007
-1.9
-2.6
-10.9
-16
13.6

Dec.
2008
-17.8
-20.1
-22.0
-14.8
-40.0

Oct.
2009
6.5
6.6
4.9
9.4
-4.6

Total Industry 2.6
Manufacturing 1.6
-5.0
Textile
17.8
Machinery
Transportation 10.0
Equipment
Table 4: Percentage Change of Monthly Industrial
Production Index over to the Same Month of the Previous
Year (2005=100.0)

Source: TURKSTAT
World trade contracted 9.8 percent in the last quarter of 2008 and 31.9 percent in the first half of 2009 (Fig.
2). The annual volume of external trade was USD 348 billion as of September 2008 and dropped to USD 258 billion
as of June 2009. Decline in exports has been significant in the current crisis whereas in the previous one they were
less affected. This result is as expected. Because in the last crisis the whole world is in recession.

Figure 2: Export levels of the World and Turkey
Source: http://www.istanbul2009turkey.org/istanbul2009/Turkey/Turkish%20Economy.pdf
Together with the weakening in oil and commodity prices and decline in exports of technology intensive
sectors with higher dependency, imports has also been declining since October 2008 (Fig. 3).

716

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

Figure 3: Exports and Imports
Source: http://www.istanbul2009turkey.org/istanbul2009/Turkey/Turkish%20Economy.pdf

Export (YTL/TL)
Import (YTL/TL)

Dec.2002
54.622
78.390

Dec.2003
70.370
103.425

Dec.2004
90.327
139.677

Dec.2005
99.039
157.381

Dec.2006
123.342
201.078

Dec. 2007
139.340
221.029

Dec. 2008
170.513
258.691

Nov. 2009
130.143
175.654

Table 5: Exports and Import of Turkey
Source: TURKSTAT
As a result, world trade volume and global economic activity has weakened substantially because of the
global financial turmoil especially since the third quarter of 2008. Parallel to this development, Turkey‘s exports has
been declining since October 2008 due to the significant slowdown in her major trading partners, especially in the
European Union (EU). The increase in trade volume with African nations turned out to be a factor that restricted the
further fall in exports (www.istanbul2009turkey.org).
The Impact on Financial Markets
The Turkish currency and financial markets came under significant pressure from the turmoil in global
markets that broke out in July 2007 and subsequent decline in risk appetite for emerging market investments. The
Istanbul Stock Exchange lost about 55% of its value from July 2007 until March 2009, when a rebound started.
Between March and June 2009, the stock exchange regained some ground, but remained around 30% below the July
2007 value (Fig. 4).

Figure 4: Price Indices ISE National-100, According to Closing Price
Source: www.tcmb.gov.tr

717

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo

Turkish Lira has been in a strengthening period after 2002. The Lira became more volatile during the subprime credit crunch, but did not depreciate strongly until October-November 2008- after Lehman Brothers collapsed.
So, international financial crisis put upward pressure on the exchange rate and TL depreciated. From October 2008
until March 2009, the lira lost around 25% of its value against Euro, but has since regained about 10% (Macvoeli,
2009). The Lira also lost about 20% of its value against US Dollar from September 2008 to June 2009.
The Impact on Banking Sector
In Turkey, the financial sector is yet at the stage of growth. It is small and shallow when compared with the
financial sectors of developed countries. It is estimated that the ratio of financial assets, consisting of bank assets,
shares and public and private borrowing instruments, to GDP was 150 percent for Turkey, 246 percent for
developing countries and 421 percent for the world in 2007. The banking system has a major share in the financial
sector (www.tbb.org.tr).
After the 2001 financial crisis, a restructuring program was applied in the banking sector. Bankrupt banks
were closed, taken over or merged with other banks after the 2001 crisis. Risk management systems improved and
public supervision became more effective in this period. Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency fulfilled its
regulation and supervision responsibilities very well in 2000s. The banking sector has showed a rapid growth
performance after this program. The total assets rose from USD 130 billion to USD 465 billion, their ratio to GDP
from 57 percent to 77 percent. In this period, the financial structure of the sector also became stronger. The
shareholders‘ equity of the sector also became stronger. The shareholders‘ equity of the sector increased from USD
16 billion to USD 54 billion and its free equity from USD 3 billion to USD 40 billion (www.tbb.org.tr). As a result
of success of ―Banking Restructuring Program‖ and change in the risk management conception Turkish Banking
Sector seemed well positioned to weather the global financial crisis, the opposite of the situation in the EU and the
US where the crisis was first triggered by the financial turmoil. Financial sector as a whole and banking sector grew
faster than the general economy in 2008. Total assets of Turkish financial sector and banking sector grew 23% and
26%, respectively. Total assets of Turkish financial sector and banking sector reached to 945.4 billion Turkish Liras
(TL) in 2008 (Bastı, 2009).
Performance indicators of the banking sector were also generally positive in 2008. Capital adequacy ratio of
the sector is above the legal limits. There is small deterioration in solvency and leverage ratios, but debt repayment
capacity of the banking sector seems still healthy. Profitability of the banking sector is still very high by the end of
2008 (Bastı, 2009).

The Economic Austerity Measures of Turkey against the Global Financial Crisis
The authorities and organizations adopted a series of measures to lessen the effects of the global financial
crisis on their own countries, and also in Turkey. Those anti-crisis measures adopted by the authorities initially on
the monetary side and subsequently became more pronounced in the fiscal policy area. This was broadly in line with
the crisis response packages adopted internationally, while taking into account the particularities of Turkey‘s
macroeconomic framework in terms of available room for counter-cyclical measures. The Central Bank, Banking
Regulation and Supervision Agency, and Turkish Government have taken some austerity measures against global
financial crisis to protect Turkey from the negative effects of the global financial crisis.
Central Bank Measures against the Global Financial Crisis
Problems in the international credit markets have heightened since the second half of September due to
increased concerns over the credibility of the financial system, thus leading to liquidity problems in many countries.
During this period, the Central Bank adopted the following regulations in order to ensure the efficient functioning of
the foreign exchange market and to strengthen foreign exchange liquidity in the banking system in case of liquidity
problems (www.tcmb.gov.tr ): Central Bank declared that it will resume its activities as an intermediary in the
Foreign Exchange Deposit Market until the removal of uncertainties in international markets since 9 October 2008.
Central Bank increased its transaction limits in the Foreign Exchange Deposit Market by twofold to USD 10.8 billion
since 23October 2008. Central Bank extended lending maturity to one month from one week in the Foreign
Exchange Deposit Market since 21 November 2008. It adopted a strategy to use foreign exchange reserves to
primarily support the foreign exchange liquidity need of the banking system. The reserve requirement ratio was
unchanged at 6 percent in liabilities, but it was lowered to 9 percent from 11 percent in foreign exchange liabilities

718

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo
since 28 November 2008. With this measure, the Central Bank provided an additional liquidity of USD 2.5 billion to
the banking system.
The Central Bank Regulation on the Liquidity Support Facility governing the principles and procedures set
forth for the utilization of credit facilities as stipulated in subparagraph (c) of the (I) of Article 40 of the Central Bank
Law was published. Accordingly, the loans will be available (www.tbb.org.tr):

as advance payments, with one month maturities for a maximum of one year period,

at the lending rate set for the intraday transactions carried out at the Interbank Money Market; bearing in
mind the principle that interest rates applicable to credits of this nature are higher than those applicable to normal
open market transactions of the central banks,

against collaterals accepted at the Interbank Money Market,

being limited to the amount twice as much as the equity capital of the applying bank.
In the last quarter of 2008, global financial conditions have been tighter than required by the stance of
monetary policy, owing mainly to the intensification of the global financial crisis. Turkey has also been undergoing a
similar process. In this context, the Central Bank recently made a measured cut in short-term interest rates, in order
to offset the extra tightening in monetary conditions (www.tcmb.gov.tr).
Because of the fluctuations due to decrease in the depth of foreign exchange market, the Central Bank has
decided to inject foreign exchange liquidity into the market in March 10, 2009 through pre-announced foreign
exchange selling auctions under the basic principles of floating exchange rate regime. Daily amount of foreign
exchange to be sold via auctions has been set as USD 50 million. Until April 2009, when the auctions were
postponed, the amount sold through auctions reached USD 900 million. The Central Bank has started foreign
exchange buying auctions in order to increase foreign exchange reserves and the amount bought through the auctions
reached to 1.3 billion dollar as of September 15 2009 (www.istanbul2009turkey.org). The Central Bank cut its
interest rates and extended the maturity in foreign exchange deposit market in order to prevent a possible foreign
exchange squeeze in the financial market. Accordingly, lending rate was reduced to 5.5 percent from 7.0 percent for
USD, and to 6.5 percent from 9.0 percent for Euro. The maturity of interbank transactions was extended to 3 months
from 1 month (www.tbb.org.tr).
Central Bank increased the exports rediscount credit limit by USD 500 million to USD 1 billion in order to
contain the effects of the global financial crisis on industry sectors. Additionally, the rules and principles applicable
to the exports rediscount loan limit were rearranged for rendering the use of these loans easier. Therefore, the
condition that sets forth assignment of the reserves for letters of credit to the Central Bank was repealed (Erdönmez,
2009).
The Banking Regulation and Supervision (BRSA) Measures against the Global Financial Crisis
The Banking Regulation and Supervision (BRSA) adopted certain measures aimed at preserving the
financial strength of banks and containing the effects of abrupt changes in the financial asset prices on banks‘ capital
adequacies. BRSA required banks to get permission for distribution of the 2008 earnings and to protect the balance
sheets of the banks from the last interest rate increase BRSA made a new arrangement. BRSA allowed banks to
reclassify the securities in their balance sheet from trading portfolio to investment portfolio for once only. BRSA
allowed banks to restructure the loans apparently posing no problems in order to ensure smooth functioning of the
loan relations between banks and non-financial institutions (www.tbb.org.tr).
The Government Measures against the Global Financial Crisis
To mitigate the adverse effects of global financial crisis on the Turkish Economy the Government has taken
various measures. Credit subsidies have been provided to the real sector with special focus on small and medium
enterprises and also exporters, guarantee and credit limits of Eximbank were increased, value added tax and special
consumption tax on many products such as automobile, furniture, home appliances and residential estates were
reduced temporarily, withholding tax on stocks for local investors was removed, the amount of short-term working
allowance was increased and its duration was lengthened, unemployment insurance payments were amplified,
infrastructure expenditures to the Southeastern Anatolia Project were increased, transfer payments to local
governments were increased, incentives on income tax, energy supports, and social security premiums were extended
for one year, a new employment package was prepared, a new incentive system was prepared to support investments
taking sectoral and regional priorities into consideration, loan guarantee application for small and medium
enterprises (SMEs) were enhanced, regulations for reconstructing cumulative credit card debts were put into practice
(www.treasury.gov.tr).

719

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo
The Government sought authorization from the Parliament for increasing and determining for a period of
two years the deposit insurance coverage, which was TL 50,000. This amendment allowed for the Treasury‘s direct
guarantee on the deposits insured as the Savings Deposit Insurance Fund‘s (SDIF) own resources would not be
sufficient to cover an unlimited insurance on deposits for which the SDIF was authorized under the current law.
Additionally, the Finance Ministry introduced tax advantages for sectors. Accordingly, payment of the tax dues
which became payable before 1 September 2008 was decided to be deferred to December 2008 and with 18
installments (www.tbb.org.tr).
With a law, called Asset Peace Law, the real and legal person owing money, foreign exchange, stocks and
other precious assets abroad as of 1 October 2008 allowed to bring them and register those precious assets in Turkey
by paying two percent tax. Similarly, it was also decided that current income and corporate taxpayers should be able
to register their existing securities and real properties inside Turkey which were not registered as of 1 October 2008
through payment of five percent tax (Erdönmez, 2009).
―The Law No. 5834 About Omission of the Past Records for Unpaid Checks and Protested Promissory
Notes, and Credit and Credit Card Debts‖, known as the law for the amnesty records allowed the deletion of the real
and legal persons‘ past records kept at the Central Bank for their unpaid checks, protested promissory notes, and
credit debts ensuring that such sums are totally paid before or within 6 months after its effective date or restructured
and totally paid. The Government introduced a new economic austerity package for companies, employees, and
retired people as a law. With this law, the short term employment fund implemented over Unemployment Fund was
extended to 6 months from 3 months. The amount of compensation was increased by 50 percent. According to this
law the retirement wages could never be seized (Erdönmez, 2009).
The Government also announced other measures in order to ease the effects of the global financial crisis on
13 March 2009. Accordingly, it was adopted that (www.tbb.org.tr):

consumption tax applied to durable goods and automobiles to be lowered for a period of 3 months,

value added tax (VAT) applied to real estates to be lowered to 8 percent from 18 percent for a period of 3
months,

an additional subsidy of TL 75 million to be extended to SMEs,

resource utilization support fund to be cut by 5 percentage points,

capital of Eximbank to be increased,

discounted night tariff for pricing the use off electricity in industry sector that applied to weekdays only to
be extended to cover also weekends and other public holidays,

Special Communication Tax of cable, wireless, and mobile internet service is decreased from 15 percent to
5 percent,

For 1979 and old model of automobiles which will be written off remission of tax is enabled,

To encourage the merger of SMEs the Government adopted a tax measure. SMEs which merge with other
SMEs until 31 December 2009 will be exempted from corporate tax or pay reduced corporate tax down to 7.5%.

To accelerate domestic demand the Government extended the Private Consumption Tax from 15 June 2009
to 30 September 2009.

Conclusion
The world faced a serious crisis for the first time after the ―Great Depression‖ which started in U.S. and has
spread all over the countries in a short time. Turkey has also been affected by this crisis. Foreign direct investment
inflows, export, domestic demand, and industrial production have declined, while the unemployment rate and
inflation rate have increased. Foreign exchange rate has been also affected dramatically. Lira has lost value against
Euro and US Dollar. To mitigate those adverse effects of global financial crisis on the Turkish Economy, the
Government, the Central Bank, and Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency have taken various measures.
Some of the measures taken in order to cushion negative impacts of global crisis to the national economy have been
successful, some of them expected to be effective in the forthcoming periods. A pick up in Turkish economy is
expected parallel to the recovery of the world economy.
In fact, the economical figures show that Turkey is more resilient to both domestic and external shocks than
her previous crisis experiences. The pressures on the exchange rate have not affected banking sector and currency so
much. The banking sector has remained healthy and profitable; despite the main source of the global financial crisis
was financial sector. Foreign direct investment has declined but continued to flow into the country at moderate
levels. Istanbul Stock Exchange has lost value, after a while it has started to regain its value. It can be concluded that
the performance of Turkish economy under such a serious crisis validates the success of Turkey‘s past restructurings.

720

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo
On the other side, the dramatic rise in unemployment rate and the sharper than expected decline in economic activity
show that there are still some vulnerabilities of Turkish economy.
According to many analysts the negative effects of the current crisis will remain awhile because of the weak
external environment, low levels of external and domestic demand, and shrinkage of the foreign capital inflows. The
recession has stroked the bottom in the first quarter of 2009. In the rest of the year the economy has started to rally
by force of tax incentives which have provided increase in domestic demand. At this juncture, policymakers should
aim to sustain the improvement in investor confidence and to decrease the unemployment rate. Structural reforms
boosting the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and so the competitiveness of the business sector would help
improve the performance of the economy in the upturn.
As for the Turkish economy‘s future prospects, the increase in GDP between 2002 and 2007 shows that
Turkey has an apparent growth potential. With her growth potential, young population, diverse and qualified
workforce, entrepreneurial spirit, Turkey is a crucial potential market for global investors. Its strategic location
between Europe and Asia give her an important role in this area and makes it a relatively attractive business location.
The last developments demonstrate that some of the problems of Turkish economy have been solved, but there are
still remaining problems which are waiting to be solved. So, Turkey has to continue to make restructurings and
reforms to achieve its expected growth potential.

References
Ataman Erdönmez, P. (2009). Küresel kriz ve ülkeler tarafından alınan önlemler kronolojisi. Bankacılar Dergisi, 68, 85-101.
Bastı, E. (2009). 2008 Global financial crisis and the Turkish financial system. C.U. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18 (2), 89103.
Bianco, K. M. (2008). The subprime lending crisis: Causes and effects of the mortgage meltdown. CCH Mortgage Compliance
Guide and Bank Digest, 10 Dec 2009. &lt; http://business.cch.com/bankingfinance/focus/news/Subprime_WP_rev.pdf &gt;.
Khatiwada, S., &amp; Emily, M. (2009). Current financial crisis: A review of some of the consequences, policy actions, and recent
trends. International Institute for Labour Studies, 02 Dec 2009. &lt; http://www.scribd.com/doc/7882284/Current-Financial-Crisis-aReview-of-Some-of- &gt;.
Macovei, M. (2009). Growth and economic crises in Turkey: Leaving behind a turbulent past?. European Economy, 1 Dec 2009.
&lt; http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication16004_en.pdf &gt;.
McKibbin, W. J., &amp; Andrew S. (2009). The global financial crisis: Causes and consequences. Working Papers in International
Economics, 05 Dec 2009.
&lt;http://www.melbourneinstitute.com/conf2009/Presentations/Session%205/McKibbin_Stoeckel_Session_5.pdf &gt;.
Uğur, Ç., &amp; Hatırlı S. A. (2009). Küresel ekonomik krizin Türkiye imalat sanayine etkileri. Suleyman Demirel University, 15 Dec
2009. &lt; http://idc.sdu.edu.tr/tammetinler/kalkinma/kalkinma35.pdf &gt;.
Yu, W. C., David, W. K., &amp; Tessema, M. (2009). The great destruction: Causes of the global financial crisis in 2008. Winona
State University, 1Dec 2009. &lt; http://course1.winona.edu/wyu/research/p13.pdf &gt;.
UNCTAD. (2009). Assessing the impact of the current financial and economic crisis on global FDI flows. 01 Dec 2009.
&lt;http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/webdiaeia20091_en.pdf &gt;.
Wikipedia. (2009). Subprime mortgage crisis, 10 Nov 2009. &lt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subprime_mortgage_crisis&gt;.
G20 Declaration. (2008). Summit on financial markets and world economy. 15 Nov 2009.
&lt;http://www.bond.org.uk/data/files/g20_declaration_15_nov_summit.pdf &gt;.
The Banks Association of Turkey. (2009). The Financial System and Banking Sector in Turkey. 1 Dec
2009.&lt;http://www.tbb.org.tr/Dosyalar/Arastirma_ve_Raporlar/The_Financial_System_and_Banking_Sector_in_Turkey.pdf &gt;.
Istanbul2009Turkey. Turkish economy. 10 Dec 2009.
&lt;http://www.istanbul2009turkey.org/istanbul2009/Turkey/Turkish%20Economy.pdf &gt;.

721

�2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8-9 2010, Sarajevo
TCMB. (2008). 2009 Yılında para ve kur politikası. Nov 2009.
&lt;http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/yeni/duyuru/2008/Baskan_ParaPol09.pdf&gt;.
www.osd.org.tr
www.tbb.org.tr
www.treasury.gov.tr
www.turkstat.gov.tr
www.tcmb.gov.tr
www.unctad.org

722

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23659">
                <text>215</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23660">
                <text>Global Financial Crisis: Economic Austerity Measures Of Turkey</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23661">
                <text>KILIÇ, Merve</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23662">
                <text>The global financial crisis has been the worst financial crisis since the one related to the  Great Depression of the 1930s. It contributed to widespread business contraction, increases in  unemployment, shrinking government revenues, declines in consumer wealth, and so a significant  decline in economic activity. Many causes have been cited about the global financial crisis by  leading economists and experts. Both market-based and regulatory solutions have been presented  to lessen the dramatic effects of the crisis.  The collapse of a housing bubble, which peaked in the United States in 2006, erupted in 2007 and  led to a global financial crisis in 2008. This crisis has been triggered by a dramatic rise in  mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures in the U.S. and has caused the values of securities tied to  housing prices. So it has damaged financial institutions all over the world. The financial crisis  which began in industrialized countries quickly spread to emerging and developing economies.  Questions about bank liquidity, declines in credit availability, and damaged investor confidence  had a negative impact on global markets, and caused large losses during 2008.  This global crisis also affected Turkey. But the effects of this crisis on Turkey were limited.  Demand in global and national markets has decreased. So the trade level in both national and  global markets has also decreased. Bank‘s liquidity and profitability seemed healthy during such a  crucial crisis. There were several policies of Turkish Government to diminish the effects of  financial crisis about interest rates, tax rates, exports rediscount credit limit etc.  This study aims to analyze the effects of the global financial crisis and the measures taken by  Turkey to lessen the negative effects of it on Turkish economy.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23663">
                <text>2010-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23664">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>HB Economic Theory</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2600" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20425">
                <text>869</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20426">
                <text>Global Simulation of a Global Understanding Course: Developing language competence and raising cultural awareness</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20427">
                <text>Trajanoska , Ivana 
Jovancevska-Milenkovska , Jovanka 
Klisarovska, Elena </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20428">
                <text>This paper aims at presenting how a Global Understanding course syllabus can be used in an EFL classroom using the Global Simulation Method.   The Global Understanding course has been offered to students from different faculties at the University American College Skopje, Macedonia in collaboration with the East Carolina University, USA and other partner Universities from countries all around the world. The course fosters global understanding and intercultural communication through direct contact with students from different Universities from various countries.  Students communicate with their colleagues through chat session and  conference links, and discuss previously assigned topics dealing with college and family life, educational system in their country, personal plans for their future, traditions, customs, food, holidays, celebrations, religion, the meaning of life. Students write diary entries on their sessions, create joint papers on a chosen subject matter with their partner student, give Power Point presentations, and do quizzes on the partner country facts. The objective is becoming more intercultural, being able to collaborate with people from different culture than your own, shattering prejudice and stereotypes, and diminishing ethnocentrism.     In this paper we would like to suggest ways how to adapt the GU course syllabus for TEFL purposes through the Global Simulation Method developing language skills in an interactive and playful atmosphere. The Global Simulation Method is a communicative approach to language learning which has not been exhaustively explored in the EFL classroom compared to its popularity in the FLE classroom. However, it enables the students to develop language competences in a motivating, true-to-life atmosphere, where they become active participants of the learning process. The global simulation of the GU course gives the students the opportunity to work on their speaking, writing, and listening skills, learn language in context and through practical usage, become more independent learners, and raise their cultural awareness.  </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20429">
                <text>2012-05</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20430">
                <text>Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="32">
        <name>P Philology. Linguistics</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="770" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="870">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/4774009235f838f081b0b522b7de0780.docx</src>
        <authentication>fb81473f592e6cb2a72542b75a21ea25</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="871">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/9c3121deb7c9c1ecc2419c34061d81f7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0d98cc2ac1f7a702133f634fd0b94e55</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6223">
                    <text>Global Water Issues and Changes in Water Resources Management Policies
Ömer Faruk Bilbay
Mustafa Kemal University
Turkey
bilbay1987@hotmail.com
Veysel Eren
Mustafa Kemal University
Turkey
bilbay1987@hotmail.com
Yakup Bulut
Mustafa Kemal University
Turkey
bilbay1987@hotmail.com
Abstract: Water is a very important natural resource for both sustain of universe and whole live
life. Water has maintained its importance throughout history and it had played effective role on
emerging and developing of many civilizations. Today, such a fast growing world population,
global warming, decreasing of water resources, high cost of alternative fresh water,
unconsciously and primitive farming irrigation, wasting urbanization which out of order, water
pollution because of industry waste and another problems has been emerged. This situation has
made water resources management as an international discussion both aspect of politic and
economic.
Deficiencies in the amount and quality of water have been considered to be a threat both people
and live species. . Therefore, nowadays the basis of the sustainability of water resources has
become more important and necessity. In addition to national and international actors nongovernmental organizations take on an important role in this regard the importance of the future
path of the water with carrying out the support of the financial incentive, conferences, decisions,
projects and they have demonstrated that how fresh resources water will be very important for
the future of life. In this study we will examine reason of global water problems, sustainable
water resources management, the transformations and changes in water resources policies and
give advices about solution.
Keywords: Water Resources, Water Politics, Water Problems, Sustainability, Water
Management, Global Warming.

151

�151

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6215">
                <text>2612</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6216">
                <text>Global Water Issues and Changes in Water Resources Management Policies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6217">
                <text>BILBAY, Omer Faruk
EREN, Veysel
BULUT, Yakup</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6218">
                <text>Water is a very important natural resource for both sustain of universe and whole live life. Water has maintained its importance throughout history and it had played effective role on emerging and developing of many civilizations. Today, such a fast growing world population, global warming, decreasing of water resources, high cost of alternative fresh water, unconsciously and primitive farming irrigation, wasting urbanization which out of order, water pollution because of industry waste and another problems has been emerged. This situation has made water resources management as an international discussion both aspect of politic and economic.    Deficiencies in the amount and quality of water have been considered to be a threat both people and live species. . Therefore, nowadays the basis of the sustainability of water resources has become more important and necessity. In addition to national and international actors non-governmental organizations take on an important role in this regard the importance of the future path of the water with carrying out the support of the financial incentive, conferences, decisions, projects and they have demonstrated that how fresh resources water will be very important for the future of life. In this study we will examine reason of global water problems, sustainable water resources management, the transformations and changes in water resources policies and give advices about solution.    Keywords: Water Resources, Water Politics, Water Problems, Sustainability, Water Management, Global Warming.  </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6219">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6220">
                <text>2014-04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6221">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6222">
                <text>ISSN 2303-4564     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="722" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="780">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/375ffb0309ce0b46d869cce280f6d5a8.docx</src>
        <authentication>f0b2e1ba18f5a70837c86af93b537b0c</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="781">
        <src>https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/original/f40f64698fdfae0897bf795534e3690f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f3beb54363748f1486609054a55a2f5f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5798">
                    <text>Globalization and Albanian Civil Society during the Democratic Transition

SalihOzcan
Epoka University
Albania
sozcan@epoka.edu.al
Gilda Hoxha
Epoka University
Albania
gildahoxha@gmail.com

Abstract: This paper is part of a research on Albanian society after 1990. This study will
attempt to explain and analyses the effect of globalization on the democratization process of
Albania. Within this framework this paper will focus mainly on to identify the role of civil
society on political behavior in Albanian case. To achieve this goal, the principal aims are to
examine how civil society in Albania is involved during the „democratic transition‟ after the
fall of communism and the civil movements' influence on political behavior.In order to
analyze the relationship between the concept of “civil society” and “democratization
process” in Albania, it will be studied, among others, from two perspectives: a- in terms of
national, political and social context that formed the movement's goals and strategies in terms
of becoming influential on the decision-making process of government through the protests in
Albania.
Secondly the features of Albanian civil society will be treated in this paper, based on the
debate: “How globalization has influenced the philosophy and organization of civil society?
This debate will compare with the cases in the neighboring countries in the Balkan region. In
theory, one of the main functions of civil society is to play an important and „tutoring‟ role in
the process of building a democratic society. Analyzing civil society in Albania requires
looking at the way how civil society works and interacts with various financial, human and
technical factors.
This paper will be based on qualitative method. For analytic purposes, the discussion is
organized in two main parts. The first part, examines theoretical part and focusing on the key
issues that relate and link the government and NGOs in decision making process and political
behavior of Albanian civil society. The second part examines existing Albanian civil society
and its outcomes during the 'democratic transition' in reference with the first theoretical part.
The paper will conclude with predicting the future of civil society in Albania.
Keywords: Globalization, Civil Society, Protest, Political behavior, Albania.

30

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="79">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5790">
                <text>2460</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5791">
                <text>Globalization and Albanian Civil Society during the Democratic Transition</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="96">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description>Author</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5792">
                <text>OZCAN, Salih
HOXHA, Gilda</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="94">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5793">
                <text>This paper is part of a research on Albanian society after 1990. This study will attempt to explain and analyses the effect of globalization on the democratization process of Albania. Within this framework this paper will focus mainly on to identify the role of civil society on political behavior in Albanian case. To achieve this goal, the principal aims are to examine how civil society in Albania is involved during the ‘democratic transition’ after the fall of communism and the civil movements' influence on political behavior.In order to analyze the  relationship between the concept of “civil society” and “democratization process” in Albania, it will be studied, among others, from two perspectives: a- in terms of national, political and social context that formed the movement's goals and strategies in terms of becoming influential on the decision-making process of government through the protests in Albania.    Secondly the features of Albanian civil society will be treated in this paper, based on the debate: “How globalization has influenced the philosophy and organization of civil society? This debate will compare with the cases in the neighboring countries in the Balkan region. In theory, one of the main functions of civil society is to play an important and ‘tutoring’ role in the process of building a democratic society. Analyzing civil society in Albania requires looking at the way how civil society works and interacts with various financial, human and technical factors.    This paper will be based on qualitative method. For analytic purposes, the discussion is organized in two main parts. The first part, examines theoretical part and focusing on the key issues that relate and link the government and NGOs in decision making process and political behavior of Albanian civil society. The second part examines existing Albanian civil society and its outcomes during the 'democratic transition' in reference with the first theoretical part. The paper will conclude with predicting the future of civil society in Albania.    Keywords: Globalization, Civil Society, Protest, Political behavior, Albania.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5794">
                <text>International Burch University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5795">
                <text>2014-04-24</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="97">
            <name>Keywords</name>
            <description>Keywords.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5796">
                <text>Article
PeerReviewed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5797">
                <text>ISSN 2303-4564     </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>H Social Sciences (General)</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
