<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/2567">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Pride Conceptualization in English and Bosnian Idioms]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The paper analyses the concept of pride in English and Bosnian idioms through the application of cognitive theory: the theory of conceptual metaphor and metonymy. The first part of the paper presents some of the major traditional theories on idioms, which view phraseological units as strings of words whose meaning is not a composition of the meaning of idiom’s component parts, and is, hence, arbitrary. We then introduce cognitive linguistic view on idioms, which brings new perspective to the analysis of their meaning, showing that it is not arbitrary, as traditionally believed, but quite the opposite, motivated by various cognitive mechanisms and our perception of the world surrounding us.    The second part of the paper deals with cognitive mechanisms; conceptual metaphor and metonymy, showing how these function in structuring our thought and language through various mappings from one conceptual domain to another, or in case of metonymy inside one domain. After defining conceptual domain of PRIDE, and various other concepts that the concept of PRIDE involves, such as CONCEIT, SELF-ESTEEM, SELF-ASSURANCE, ARROGANCE, SUPERIORITY, we discuss various metaphors and metonymies for pride proposed by Kövecses (1986), showing that most of these motivate the meaning of idioms, e.g. PRIDE IS A FLUID IN A CONTAINER, CONCEITED PERSON IS BIG, INTERFERENCE WITH NORMAL MENTAL FUNCTIONING FOR PRIDE, FORMS OF WALKING FOR PRIDE, etc.  Finally, we discuss interaction of these cognitive mechanisms in helping us conceptualize the world surrounding us, but also facilitate the understanding of these abstract concepts  ]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2012-05]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[873]]></dcterms:extent>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/317">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[PRIJEVREMENA OTPLATA KREDITA PREMA ZAKONU O ZAŠTITI KORISNIKA FINANSIJSKIH USLUGA FBiH I ZAKONU O BANKAMA REPUBLIKE SRPSKE]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Rad analizira temeljne odrednice i specifičnosti prava korisnika kredita na prijevremenu otplatu kredita, definisane Zakonom o zaštiti korisnika finansijskih usluga FBiH i Zakonom o bankama RS, tj. zakonskim propisima kojima je u nacionalno zakonodavstvo BiH (kroz entitetske propise) implementirana Direktiva 2008/48/EZ o ugovorima o potrošačkom kreditu. Kao rezultat nekonzistentnog i nesistematičnog transponiranja direktiva EU u pravni sistem BiH, pored navedenih propisa, pravo na prijevremenu otplatu kredita regulisano je i Zakonom o zaštiti potrošača BiH kojim su preuzeta vrlo štura rješenja “stare” direktive o potrošačkom kreditu (Direktiva 87/102/EEZ o potrošačkom kreditu). Na taj način, u BiH je stvorena situacija da istovremeno egzistiraju kako stara tako i nova rješenja potrošačkih direktiva (iako je stupanjem na snagu Direktive 2008/48/EZ prestala da važi Direktiva 87/102/EEZ), a time i ona vezana za pravo potrošača, korisnika kredita na prijevremenu otplatu kredita. Kada se tome doda supsidijarna primjena odredaba ZOO o ugovoru o kreditu, onda je jasno da rascjepkanost propisa iz navedene oblasti često dovodi do konfuzije i raznih problema u vezi sa adekvatnim i potpunim korištenjem pomenutog prava. Međutim, u cilju poboljšanja stepena zaštite korisnika kredita kroz institut prijevremene otplate kredita, Zakonom o zaštiti korisnika finansijskih usluga FBiH i Zakonom o bankama Republike Srpske (tj. njegovom izmjenom i dopunom iz 2011.godine) uvedene su značajne novine i načinjeni pomaci u tom pravcu, kao npr. detaljno zakonsko uređenje pomenutog prava korisnika kredita, ograničenje visine naknade banke za prijevremenu otplatu kredita i sl. Imajući u vidu značaj navedenih novina, u radu su iste elaborirane, ukazano je na neke njihove slabosti te ponuđena moguća rješenja za otklanjanje detektiranih nedostataka.     Ključne riječi: kredit, prijevremena otplata kredita, korisnik kredita, Zakon o zaštiti korisnika finansijskih usluga FBiH, Zakon o bankama RS, Zakon o obligacionim odnosima, Direktiva 2008/48/EZ.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Centar za društvena istraživanja Internacionalnog Burč univerziteta]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2015-12-16]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[3178]]></dcterms:extent>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[ISSN 978-9958-834-50-9     ]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/858">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Primjena konvencije o pravima osoba s invaliditetom u Hrvatskoj i Bosni i Hercegovini: Stvarnost ili utopija?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Hrvatska i Bosna i Hercegovina ratificirale su Konvenciju Ujedinjenih naroda o pravima osoba s invaliditetom (u daljnjem tekstu: Konvencija), kojom se mijenja pristup zaštiti i položaju osoba s invaliditetom u međunarodnoj zajednici. U Konvenciji su sadržana načela i smjernice, koje se odnose na punu uključenost osoba s invaliditetom u društvo, njihovu ravnopravnost i nediskriminaciju, zaštitu od svakog oblika nasilja, kao i na zaštitu njihove autonomije volje.    Cilj rada jest analizirati skrbničku zaštitu i položaj osoba s invaliditetom u obiteljskopravnim odnosima te njihovo sudjelovanje u sudskim, upravnim i drugim (nedržavnim) postupcima u kojima se rješava o tim odnosima prema važećem hrvatskom i bosansko-hercegovačkom uređenju, uz upućivanje na osnovne zahtjeve Konvencije te prijedloge novog hrvatskog zakonodavstva na tom području.    U drugom dijelu rada, koji slijedi uvod, razmatraju se i uspoređuju važeća, hrvatska i bosansko-hercegovačka, rješenja u području skrbničke zaštite odraslih osoba, kao i njihov položaj u obiteljskopravnim odnosima. Potom se daje analiza položaja osoba s invaliditetom u sudskim, upravnim i drugim (nedržavnim) postupcima u kojim se raspravlja odnosno odlučuje o pravima i obvezama građanske naravi. Posebno se razmatraju odredbe o postupovnoj sposobnosti te zastupanju tih osoba u postupku.    U četvrtom dijelu ističu se najznačajnije intervencije prema prijedlogu novog hrvatskog zakonodavstva u području skrbničke zaštite odraslih osoba, kao i u njihov položaj u obiteljskopravnim odnosima. Zatim slijedi prikaz novog uređenja postupovnopravnog položaja osoba s invaliditetom u različitim sudskim, upravnim, ali i drugim (nedržavnim) postupcima u kojim se raspravlja odnosno odlučuje o pravima i obvezama građanske naravi. Zaključno, određuju se projekcije de lege ferenda u cilju potpunog usklađivanja hrvatskog zakonodavstva sa zahtjevima Konvencije, kao i moguće smjernice za očekivane reforme u Bosni i Hercegovini.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Bihaću i Centar za društvena istraživanja Internacionalnog Burč univerziteta]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2014]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[3102]]></dcterms:extent>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/948">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[PRIMJENA STANDARDA „NAJBOLJI INTERES DJETETA” U  STARATELJSKOJ ZAŠTITI DJECE BEZ RODITELJSKOG  STARANJA (PRAVNI OKVIR I PRAKSA)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Starateljska zaštita djece bez roditeljskog staranja se aktualizira u  slučajevima taksativno navedenim u odredbama porodičnog zakonodavstva i  zakonodavstva u oblasti socijalne zaštite u Bosni i Hercegovini. Pravnom  analizom tih odredaba očigledno je da se starateljstvo nad maloljetnicima  primjenjuje kao jedan od oblika zaštite djece bez roditeljskog staranja, te da je  primjena standarda „najbolji interes djeteta” u kontekstu zaštite djece bez  roditeljskog staranja samo djelimično zastupljena. U radu se ukazuje na  nedostatna zakonodavna rješenja u pogledu primjene pomenutog standarda, na  praksu izostajanja adekvatnih oblika zaštite djece bez roditeljskog staranja te  potrebu poštivanja pojedinih prava djeteta shodno UN Konvenciji o pravima  djeteta i drugim relevantim dokumetima u zaštiti djece bez roditeljskog staranja.  Ključne riječi: dijete bez roditeljskog staranja, starateljska zaštita i  drugi oblici zaštite, standard najbolji interes djeteta]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Law faculty of University Džemal Bijedić Mostar]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2014]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[3042]]></dcterms:extent>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/494">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Priorities for Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting:  Evidence from Listed Turkish Companies in Istanbul Stock  Exchange]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Abstract: This study is based on “stakeholder theory” in order to explain the concept of corporate social responsibility. To examine the social responsibility areas of business organizations, “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility” model developed by Carroll (1991) was used in this study. According to this model, entire range of business responsibilities can be considered in four groups: economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic. Within the framework of Carroll’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) Pyramid, the aim of this study is to illustrate priorities in Corporate Social Responsibility Report of the leading companies in Turkey. In this context, 48 companies from Borsa Istanbul  (BIST) Corporate Governance Index were selected as the sample of the study. Qualitative research approach was used in the study. The data obtained from the annual reports, sustainability reports and corporate governance compliance reports of these 48 companies were subjected to content analysis. According to the findings, economic and legal responsibilities were found to have priority for shareholders, customers and employees stakeholder groups in terms of corporate social responsibility levels. While philanthropic responsibility was found to have priority for community stakeholder group, economic responsibility is important for suppliers stakeholder group. Legal responsibility, on the other hand, is important for environment stakeholder group. In general, economic and legal responsibilities have priorities in all stakeholder groups other than community stakeholder group.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2015]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[2945]]></dcterms:extent>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/495">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Priorities for Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting:  Evidence from Listed Turkish Companies in Istanbul Stock  Exchange]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Abstract: This study is based on “stakeholder theory” in order to explain the concept of corporate social responsibility. To examine the social responsibility areas of business organizations, “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility” model developed by Carroll (1991) was used in this study. According to this model, entire range of business responsibilities can be considered in four groups: economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic. Within the framework of Carroll’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) Pyramid, the aim of this study is to illustrate priorities in Corporate Social Responsibility Report of the leading companies in Turkey. In this context, 48 companies from Borsa Istanbul  (BIST) Corporate Governance Index were selected as the sample of the study. Qualitative research approach was used in the study. The data obtained from the annual reports, sustainability reports and corporate governance compliance reports of these 48 companies were subjected to content analysis. According to the findings, economic and legal responsibilities were found to have priority for shareholders, customers and employees stakeholder groups in terms of corporate social responsibility levels. While philanthropic responsibility was found to have priority for community stakeholder group, economic responsibility is important for suppliers stakeholder group. Legal responsibility, on the other hand, is important for environment stakeholder group. In general, economic and legal responsibilities have priorities in all stakeholder groups other than community stakeholder group.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2015]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[2946]]></dcterms:extent>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/496">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Priorities for Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting:  Evidence from Listed Turkish Companies in Istanbul Stock  Exchange]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Abstract: This study is based on “stakeholder theory” in order to explain the concept of corporate social responsibility. To examine the social responsibility areas of business organizations, “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility” model developed by Carroll (1991) was used in this study. According to this model, entire range of business responsibilities can be considered in four groups: economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic. Within the framework of Carroll’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) Pyramid, the aim of this study is to illustrate priorities in Corporate Social Responsibility Report of the leading companies in Turkey. In this context, 48 companies from Borsa Istanbul  (BIST) Corporate Governance Index were selected as the sample of the study. Qualitative research approach was used in the study. The data obtained from the annual reports, sustainability reports and corporate governance compliance reports of these 48 companies were subjected to content analysis. According to the findings, economic and legal responsibilities were found to have priority for shareholders, customers and employees stakeholder groups in terms of corporate social responsibility levels. While philanthropic responsibility was found to have priority for community stakeholder group, economic responsibility is important for suppliers stakeholder group. Legal responsibility, on the other hand, is important for environment stakeholder group. In general, economic and legal responsibilities have priorities in all stakeholder groups other than community stakeholder group.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2015]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[2947]]></dcterms:extent>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/498">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Priorities for Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Evidence from Listed Turkish Companies in Istanbul Stock Exchange]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Abstract: This study is based on &quot;stakeholder theory&quot; in order to explain the concept of corporate social responsibility. To examine the social responsibility areas of business organizations, “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility” model developed by Carroll (1991) was used in this study. According to this model, entire range of business responsibilities can be considered in four groups: economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic. Within the framework of Carroll’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) Pyramid, the aim of this study is to illustrate priorities in Corporate Social Responsibility Report of the leading companies in Turkey. In this context, 48 companies from Borsa Istanbul (BIST) Corporate Governance Index were selected as the sample of the study. Qualitative research approach was used in the study. The data obtained from the annual reports, sustainability reports and corporate governance compliance reports of these 48 companies were subjected to content analysis. According to the findings, economic and legal responsibilities were found to have priority for shareholders, customers and employees stakeholder groups in terms of corporate social responsibility levels. While philanthropic responsibility was found to have priority for community stakeholder group, economic responsibility is important for suppliers stakeholder group. Legal responsibility, on the other hand, is important for environment stakeholder group. In general, economic and legal responsibilities have priorities in all stakeholder groups other than community stakeholder group.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2015]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[2928]]></dcterms:extent>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/463">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Prison Violence Prevention: a Restorative Approach]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Abstract: “Getting tough on crime” policies often result in increased number of inmates, which, in the situation of insufficient prison capacity leads to the problem of overcrowding. Overcrowding is considered one of the risk factors for the development of conflict and violent behavior as a way of resolving these conflicts. Due to the overcrowding that exists in the Croatian penal system, a survey was conducted to determine the incidence and structure of violent behavior, determining the predictive characteristics, analyzes the existing mechanisms of prevention of violence and proposing improvements for prevention of violence in the penal system. Included are various forms and directions of violence: “prisoner to prisoner” violence (experience of victimization and victimizing other prisoners), “prisoner to staff” violence and use of force against prisoners. Quantitative and qualitative approaches were applied. Sample comprised of 353 prisoners, 154 of warders and 193 employees of other departments. After getting results of quantitative research, focus groups or structured interviews (on the results) were conducted with prisoners and prison staff. This paper brings general descriptive data and discuss the possibilities of preventing violence in the penal system using programs based on the principles of restorative justice.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2015]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[2853]]></dcterms:extent>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[ISSN 2303-5706     ]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/2739">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[PRISONERS OF DREAMS AND DEFEATED DREAMERS: DESIRE  UNDER THE ELMS VS. THE CONSUL, THE TANNER, AND THE  ACTRESS]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The present paper attempts to offer a comparative study between Eugene O‘Neill‘s drama Desire under  the Elms and Diplomatul, tãbãcarul Ģi actriţa (The Consul, the Tanner, and the Actress) by Carol Ardeleanu. I  will undertake to compare two stories about aspiration towards high-class status, beauty, happiness, freedom,  and justice paid for by sacrifice, suffering and extreme passion that dominate the characters‘ lives.  Both in Desire under the Elms and in The Consul, the Tanner, and the Actress the characters are  prisoners of their own passions, vices and dreams. The walls, the ground, the protagonists‘ manner of speaking,  etc. become signs of imprisonment as well. Eugene O‘Neill‘s drama and The Consul, the Tanner, and the  Actress therefore draw their ‗life‘ from what is genuine in the human experience and existence.  In the end, the characters cannot find a way to escape from their houses and environments, and  become prisoners of disillusionment, coffins, or unrealistic aspirations. Both authors share a tragic vision of  existence, and focus on tragic stories about ―prisoners‖ of dreams and defeated romantic dreamers.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2011-05]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[696]]></dcterms:extent>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>