<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/3533">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Chronological Perspective on the Studies of Turkisms Conducted in Balkan Languages]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Turkisms in the Balkan languages continue to be an essential research subject since Karadzic published the first Serbian Dictionary in 1818. Turkisms studies have been compared to countries where the studies were published, the researchers&#039; nationalities, and the studies&#039; languages in tables. We have evaluated total of 1392 research in this study. Turkism researchers published the highest number of studies in the Turkish and Bulgarian languages. Turkisms in six Balkan languages were published in 17 languages by researchers from 21 nationalities in 35 different countries. While evaluating the studies, they have been handled in five different periods according to the Balkans&#039; significant political events during the last two centuries. We have classified studies according to 33 subtitles under four categories. These four categories are detection and collecting, classification, evaluation and analysis, and current frequency measurement and revitalization of Turkisms. The method used in this study is the same as the method used by Yücel in his six published bibliography studies. Turkism studies classified are based in this study on Yücel&#039;s six studies given in the bibliography.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/11">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[An Analysis of Gender Differences in the use of Swear Words on Facebook]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Abstract: The question of gender differences in language use has been repeatedly explored and claims about these distinctions that were once considered invariable have been questioned and refuted. One of the less explored areas within this issue, however, is the phenomenon of swearing. This paper aimed to explore how and why men and women swear on one of the most popular social media sites, Facebook, and how the context in which such utterances are produced modulates their frequency and form. The study found that both men and women are more likely to swear when commenting on the content produced by the same gender and also when surrounded by other males and females, respectively. Furthermore, the research confirmed some previous studies in which men were found to swear more out of aggressiveness, while women do so to exaggerate their words.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Melika Muhanović]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Nejla Babić]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Esma Latić]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Journal of Education and Humanities<br />
Volume 1 (2)]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Winter 2018]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Keywords: gender, differences, taboo language, swear words, social media]]></dcterms:type>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[ISSN 2566-4638<br />
DOI 10.14706/JEH2018125]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/3534">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Because Tumblr-Internet-Speak: Four Assumptions of Discourse Analysis Within New Rules of the English Language]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The literature has described linguistic deviations from the conventional use of English in<br />
Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) as distinguishing aspects of language used on<br />
the Internet. (Page, Barton, Unger, Zappavigna, 2014) The purpose of this paper is to analyse<br />
the unique language patterns seen on Tumblr, a popular microblogging platform, and how<br />
these patterns fit into four assumptions of discourse analysis as described by Rodney H. Jones<br />
(2009). Using a textual analysis method on a corpus of 60 texts extracted from Tumblr, this<br />
paper shows how four assumptions of discourse analysis can be found in Tumblr posts. The<br />
four assumptions of discourse analysis are that language is ambiguous, it is always in the<br />
world, it is used to show belonging to social groups, and it is never used alone. The ambiguity<br />
of language is taken advantage of, and Tumblr users use this ambiguity as a way of creating<br />
new vocabulary. New terms on Tumblr are coined and used by different social groups to show<br />
their association or aversion to said groups. Furthermore, textual analysis shows how Tumblr<br />
users mostly use language such as contractions, abbreviated forms, and acronyms in their<br />
blogs, which indicates that the said language is always in the world - the context in which,<br />
when, and for what a language is used determines what it signifies. Lastly, the analysis shows<br />
that the language is never used all by itself: non-standard use of punctuation adds tone to the<br />
text, and it functions as a ranting tone that impersonates rhetorical speech.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/9">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Bilingualism in Kuwait – a linguistic landscape approach]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Abstract: This paper examined the linguistic landscape of the Governorate of Farwaniya, the biggest governorate in the State of Kuwait, by means of public and private signs displayed in the city center and side streets. A corpus of 150 photos of diverse signs, both official and non-official, was collected, categorized, analyzed and discussed. The results point to an undeniable representation of the Arabic language in both public and private spheres of life as well as to a substantial presence of the English language on a wide range of signage therefore confirming the imprint the process of globalization has made on this EFL context. The findings also indicate that some other world languages, namely Bengali, Hindi, and Chinese, are represented in the linguistic landscape of Kuwait but rather poorly.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Amna Brdarević Čeljo]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Sead Zolota]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Journal of Education and Humanities<br />
Volume 1 (2)]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Winter 2018]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Keywords: linguistic landscape, monolingual and multilingual signs, official and non-official signs, ethnolinguistic vitality]]></dcterms:type>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[ISSN 2566-4638<br />
DOI 10.14706/JEH2018122]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/3493">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Bosna i Hercegovina - država ili protektorat?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[U ovom radu ćemo, kroz analizu normativnog okvira za djelovanje ovih<br />
institucija, ali i njihov sam aktivitet, te aplikaciju međunarodnih standarda u BiH,<br />
pokušati doći do odgovora na pitanje da li je Bosna i Hercegovina država ili<br />
protektorat. Kroz implementaciju Daytonskog sporazuma se postiglo dosta, ali<br />
većinom je zaslužan bio aktivitet međunarodne zajednice. Taja aktivitet ni, prema<br />
Općem okvirnom sporazumu za mir, ne predviđa protektorat. Ipak, posebno u<br />
prvim godinama funkcioniranja post-Daytonske Bosne i Hercegovine, brojni<br />
ustavno-pravni teoretičari su pokušavali definirati pravnu prirodu odnosa<br />
ovisnosti Bosne i Hercegovine prema međunarodnoj zajednici u određenim<br />
elementima (koja se kasnije sve više ublažavala). Rezultati su pokazali da nema<br />
jednoznačnog odgovora. Ovo pitanje je u posljednjih petnaest godina u domaćoj<br />
ali i regionalnoj ustavno-pravnoj nauci prešlo na periferiju interesiranja. Ali, čini<br />
se da je vrijeme da ga se ponovo postavi, posebno u svjetlu najave promjena<br />
odnosa ključnih subjekata međunarodne zajednice prema Bosni i Hercegovini.<br />
Takođe nas interesuje i pitanje koje je povezano s ovim centralnim istraživačkim,<br />
a to je stepen suvereniteta države Bosne i Hercegovine unutra, ali i prema vani,<br />
imajući u vidu Daytonski konstrukt uključenosti međunarodne zajednice u<br />
ustavno-politički sistem Bosne i Hercegovine. / In this paper, through the analysis of the normative framework for the<br />
operation of these institutions, but also their activity, and the application of<br />
international standards in BiH, we will try to find an answer to the question of<br />
whether Bosnia and Herzegovina is a state or a protectorate. A lot has been<br />
achieved through the implementation of the Dayton Agreement, but most of it was<br />
due to the activity of the international community. According to the General<br />
Framework Agreement for Peace, this activity does not envisage a protectorate.<br />
However, especially in the first years of the functioning of post-Dayton Bosnia and<br />
Herzegovina, many constitutional and legal theorists tried to define the legal<br />
nature of Bosnia and Herzegovina&#039;s dependence on the international community<br />
in certain elements (which later softened). The results showed no unambiguous<br />
answer. In the last fifteen years, this issue has moved to the periphery of interest<br />
in domestic and regional constitutional and legal science. But it seems the time to<br />
re-establish it has come, especially in light of the announcement of changes in the<br />
attitudes of key actors in the international community towards Bosnia and<br />
Herzegovina. We are also interested in the issue related to this central research,<br />
which is the degree of sovereignty of the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina inside<br />
and outside, given the Dayton construct of the international community&#039;s<br />
involvement in the constitutional and political system of Bosnia and Herzegovina.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[2566-4638]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/3492">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Colonizing the Mind: A Dialectic Approach to<br />
Education and Language in Zitkala-Ša’s<br />
American Indian Stories]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Mind colonization has been a burning issue in the last few<br />
decades in the fields of science and humanities. It is argued that mind<br />
colonization of the indigenous populations has been conducted via<br />
education and language in the mission of ‘civilizing’ since education<br />
and language carry culture specific sets of meaning, including<br />
knowledge and truth which condition our perception of the world.<br />
Zitkala-Ša is one of the earliest Native American authors and<br />
activists who sought to subvert the epistemological hierarchy<br />
imposed through mind colonization. Zitkala-Ša’s autobiographical<br />
collection of short stories titled American Indian Stories (1921)<br />
documents her boarding school experience and the acquisition of the<br />
colonizer’s education and language. The present paper seeks to<br />
address mind colonization through language and education on the<br />
example of Zitkala-Ša’s American Indian Stories relying on a<br />
number of theories and approaches. The paper also reflects on the<br />
importance of Zitkala-Ša mastery of the colonizer’s language.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[2566-4638]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/3494">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Conceptualizing News Literacy]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The nascent field of news literacy is often described as a<br />
subset of media literacy. A review of international scholarship with<br />
regard to news literacy conceptualizations confirms that there are<br />
diverse and competing notions of its definition and purpose: while<br />
the civic component of news literacy clearly distinguishes it from<br />
media literacy and other new literacies, there is a noticeable divide<br />
between journalism-driven and media literacy-derived approaches.<br />
Qualitative data analysis was used to identify patterns in a subset of<br />
approximately 120 examples of current English-language<br />
international scholarship. By proposing three preliminary<br />
taxonomic classifications of news literacy – protectionist versus<br />
empowerment; skills versus knowledge; and levels of abstraction –<br />
this conceptual paper provides orientation in the field.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[2566-4638]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/13">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Deontology of Teachers, Socrates Oath or Code of Ethics]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Abstract: Deontology, the science of teaching professional duties refers to the moral obligation of teachers towards students. The principle of ethics: &quot;Age quod agis&quot; or &quot;Do (well) what you&#039;re doing“involves legislation, psychology of communication, behavior and ethics. Overcoming pedagogical ethics as attitude towards professional obligations, community and colleagues, it studies the rights and duties regulated by the code of the profession. The difference between Bentham&#039;s and Kant&#039;s views about duties is the difference between professional oath and school&#039;s code of ethics. Therefore deontology consider duties as base of moral and professionally mature person who swears to success, while code of ethics is based on a mistrustful society that doubt in the identity of moral values, professionals and society as well.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Melisa Zukić]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Journal of Education and Humanities<br />
Volume 1 (2)]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Winter 2018]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Key words: deontology, code of ethics, Socrates oath]]></dcterms:type>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[ISSN 2566-4638<br />
DOI 10.14706/JEH2018126]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/8">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Semantic preference and semantic prosody-a theoretical overview]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Abstract: Semantic preference and semantic prosody are two notions that were carefully analysed in post-Firthian corpus linguistics and in the past few years there has been a growing interest in them. As corpora have become larger in size, and tools for extracting different lexical items for different purposes have been developed, the two terms have been addressed more frequently by linguists1. Throughout history, semantic preference and semantic prosody have sometimes been used for the same phenomenon but at other times the two were considered different but closely related. Previous corpus-based studies on the two terms have shown that they can be attached to many investigated lexical items. Therefore, this paper aims to present a detailed theoretical overview of the two terms in order to emphasise their immense importance for identifying the meaning of all the lexical items.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Mirna Begagić]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Journal of Education and Humanities <br />
Volume 1 (2)]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Winter 2018]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Keywords: semantic preference, semantic prosody, corpus, corpus linguistics.]]></dcterms:type>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[ISSN 2566-4638<br />
DOI 10.14706/JEH2018121]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/items/show/3535">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Attitudes Towards the Use of Anglicisms in the Croatian Language of Medicine]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[In this research paper, we will explore the laypersons&amp;#39; attitudes towards the use of Anglicisms<br />
in medical language. Some communication difficulties may arise between patients and their<br />
doctors because patients&amp;#39; knowledge of medicine and medical terminology is insufficient.<br />
Therefore, they often remain uninformed and misunderstood.<br />
A questionnaire-based study was carried out among 100 laypersons in Rijeka, Croatia. It<br />
aimed to explore understanding, acceptance, use, and need for Croatian equivalents, which<br />
show their attitudes towards using Anglicisms in medical communication. The findings show<br />
some statistically significant differences in terms of understanding and use of Anglicisms with<br />
respect to the age of the respondents and the level of their education. The respondents mainly<br />
justify the use of English medical terms in medicine when there is no adequate Croatian<br />
equivalent. However, a high percentage of them support the need for creating Croatian<br />
equivalents, which should be more understandable and transparent than the English ones. We<br />
can conclude that Anglicisms are widely used in the Croatian medical language, but the<br />
Croatian equivalents should be created in collaboration between doctors and linguists.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[International Burch University]]></dcterms:publisher>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
